Dharma · AI Companion

依他起相

paratantralakṣaṇa

依众缘而生起的法相AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span III · nominal designation ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

初立第三重:三性安立本身正属第三重名言施设;究竟第四重:〔唯识:于依他起上遣除遍计所执即圆成实现前,究竟归真如离言〕。〔判教镜头〕〔中观应成:依他起亦无自性、毕竟空,不许「依他起有事」〕〔唯识:依他起有事、不可说无,否则拨无因果〕——两系对其存在性判摄根本对立,跨度只记读法不裁决。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

In Buddhist philosophy—specifically within the Yogācāra (唯识, Consciousness-Only) school—the mind’s engagement with reality is analyzed through the Three Natures (三性, *Trisvabhāva*): 1. Parikalpita-svabhāva (遍计所执相): The imaginary, falsely conceptualized nature. 2. Paratantra-svabhāva (依他起相): The dependent nature. 3. Pariniṣpanna-svabhāva (圆成实相): The thoroughly established, ultimate real nature.

Among these three, Paratantra-svabhāva (依他起相, the *dependent nature* or *dependent aspect*) stands as the operational backbone of existence.

In a single sentence: **Paratantra-svabhāva refers to the intrinsic condition of all phenomena arising through the nexus of causes and conditions (*pratītyasamutpāda*); it is the functional reality upon which conceptual projections (*parikalpita*) are falsely superimposed, and through whose realization the ultimate reality (*pariniṣpanna*) is uncovered.**


What This Concept Is Saying

1. The Core Definition: Arising Through Other Factors

In the *Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra* (《解深密经》), the Buddha defines Paratantra-svabhāva as "the nature of all phenomena as dependently arisen" (一切法缘生自性) [10933]. It is governed by the foundational law of dependent origination: *"When this exists, that comes to be; with the arising of this, that arises"* (此有故彼有,此生故彼生) [10933].

In the experiential sphere of sentient beings, Paratantra manifests as the twelvefold chain of causation (十二有支)—from fundamental ignorance (*avidyā*) driving mental formations (*saṃskāra*), leading down to birth, aging, death, and the accumulation of suffering [10933]. It encompasses all impermanent, conditioned phenomena across the Five Aggregates (五蕴, *pañca-skandha*—form, feeling, perception, volitional formations, consciousness), the Twelve Sense Bases (十二处), the Eighteen Dhatus (十八界), as well as both the afflictive processes of samsara and the temporal practices on the path toward liberation [10969, 10970].

2. The Structural Function: The Ground of Illusion and Liberation

In Yogācāra epistemology, Paratantra is described as "the substrate/underlying aspect upon which conceptual projections operate" (分别所行遍计所执相所依行相) [10969].

Think of Paratantra as the functional, causal matrix of sensory and mental events. On its own, Paratantra is simply the dynamic flow of cause and effect—a sensory input meets mind-consciousness, mental seeds (*bīja*) sprout, and a moment of experience occurs.

However, ignorant beings (*pṛthagjana*) do not experience Paratantra neutrally. Instead, they immediately project onto this dynamic flow a false sense of permanence, solid selves, independent objects, and dualistic grasping ("I" vs. "other"). This false projection is Parikalpita-svabhāva (遍计所执相).

Without Paratantra (the dynamic web of dependent factors), Parikalpita (the false projection) would have no canvas upon which to appear [10966]. Conversely, when an enlightened practitioner looks directly at Paratantra and thoroughly recognizes that the superimposed Parikalpita is completely non-existent (*asat*), the underlying pure nature of that very same reality is revealed as Pariniṣpanna-svabhāva (圆成实相) [10934].

Thus, Paratantra is the neutral field where both delusion and liberation take place: * Delusion/Samsara: Paratantra + Ignorant Projection (Parikalpita) $\rightarrow$ Karmic Seeds $\rightarrow$ Continued Suffering [10963]. * Liberation/Nirvana: Paratantra - Ignorant Projection (Parikalpita) $\rightarrow$ Direct Cognition of Ultimate Nature (Pariniṣpanna) [10934].

3. The Classical Metaphors: A 1-to-1 Mapping

The *Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra* provides three distinct metaphors to explain the nature of Paratantra, each illuminating a specific nuance [10933, 10934, 10962]:

1. The Clear Crystal Metaphor (清净颇胝迦宝喻): * The Crystal (颇胝迦宝) represents *Paratantra-svabhāva*: naturally transparent, reactive, and conditioned by what surrounds it [10933]. * The External Dyes (青、赤、黄、绿等染色) represent the lingering habitual tendencies of conceptual speech and attachment (*parikalpita-svabhāva-vāsanā*) [10934]. * The Manifested Colors in the Crystal (帝青、琥珀、真金等色) represent how Paratantra appears falsely colored as solid, separate entities due to our attachments [10933]. The crystal itself never truly turns into gold or amber, yet while the dye is present, the illusion of color is unmistakably displayed.

2. The Cataract / Diseased Vision Metaphor (眩翳众相喻): * Someone suffering from cataracts or an optical disease (*timira*) sees phantom spots, floating hair, or colorful rings in empty space [10933]. * The *arising of these sensory manifestations* due to the underlying condition (the eye disease + light + visual organ) corresponds to *Paratantra* [10933]. The manifestations appear dynamically, but they do not possess an independent, concrete entity outside the causal conditions of the disease.

3. The Magical Illusion Metaphor (幻像喻): * A magician uses wood, stones, and spells (causes and conditions) to make illusory horses, elephants, or castles appear [10962]. * The illusory appearances themselves represent *Paratantra*—they are "dependently produced" (*saṃskṛta*), meaning they lack intrinsic, self-sustaining existence (Lack of Self-existence in Arising, 生无自性性) [10962, 10969]. Furthermore, because Paratantra is a conditioned, impermanent phenomenon rather than the ultimate unconditioned state, it is categorized as possessing a dimension of ultimate lack of self-existence (一分胜义无自性性) [10962, 10969].


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

To understand Paratantra-svabhāva, we must trace how our minds construct reality in ordinary contemporary moments. Most people mistake their conceptual story (*Parikalpita*) for reality, completely overlooking the dependent causal flow (*Paratantra*).

Scenario: The Late-Night Work Message

Imagine you are at home after a long workday. At 9:30 PM, your smartphone screen lights up. A message from your manager appears: *"We need to discuss your project deliverables first thing tomorrow morning."*

Let's dissect this experience using the Three Natures, highlighting where ordinary thinking makes its fundamental error:

``` [ Raw Causal Flow ] [ Mental Habit / Seed ] [ Superimposed Story ] Light on screen + Latent fear of job security = "My boss hates me, Notification sound Past memories of criticism I'm going to be fired!" Decoded text characters Physical adrenaline spike ----------------------- ------------------------- ---------------------- PARATANTRA PARATANTRA PARIKALPITA (Dependent Causality) (Dependent Causality) (Imaginary Projection) ```

Step 1: The Paratantra Layer (What is actually happening dependently)

* Form Aggregate (色蕴): Photons emitted by the screen; sound waves from the speaker; electrical signals traveling through optical nerves to the visual cortex. * Feeling Aggregate (受蕴): A neutral-to-unpleasant visceral sensation in the pit of your stomach. * Perception Aggregate (想蕴): The mind recognized Chinese/English text characters and decoded their semantic meaning. * Volitional Formations Aggregate (行蕴): A sudden surge of attention; latency seeds (*bīja*) of past anxiety about job stability or performance activated from the storehouse consciousness (*ālayavijñāna*); adrenaline releasing into the bloodstream. * Consciousness Aggregate (识蕴): The moment-to-moment awareness registering the visual image, the thought, and the bodily contraction.

This entire web—the phone, light, brain chemistry, latent memories, language decoding, and physiological reactions—is Paratantra-svabhāva. It is a complex, momentary nexus of causes and conditions. It arises because past conditions existed (*"This having arisen, that arises"*).

Step 2: The Parikalpita Layer (Where we get hooked)

Immediately after the Paratantra process occurs, the uncultivated mind superimposes a solid, unyielding story onto the flow: * *"My boss is an unreasonable tyrant who wants to destroy my weekend!"* (Solidifying the "boss" as an inherently evil entity). * *"I am a failure who always screws up!"* (Solidifying the "self" as inherently flawed). * *"My future is ruined!"* (Treating an unwritten future narrative as a concrete reality existing right now).

Where People Mis-map Reality: Most people believe that their *distress* is directly caused by the boss or the message itself. They treat the boss's text as a fixed, independently existing object containing inherent hostility.

In Buddhist terms, they have confused Paratantra (a momentary, dependently arisen event) with Parikalpita (their exaggerated, conceptually constructed projection of a solid self vs. a hostile other).

Step 3: The Path to Pariniṣpanna (Liberation within the experience)

If you practice mindfulness based on Yogācāra wisdom: 1. You observe the physical tightness in your chest, the light on the screen, and the sudden thought-bubbles as Paratantra—merely conditioned phenomena arising due to prior seeds and current stimuli. 2. You recognize that the story *"I am about to be fired and my life is over"* is Parikalpita—a completely empty, fabricated narrative projected onto the clear "crystal" of awareness. 3. By seeing that Parikalpita has no actual substance inside the Paratantra event, you relax your grasping. The emotional storm dissipates. What remains right in that moment of unattached awareness—free from false duality—is the tranquil, intrinsic reality (Pariniṣpanna-svabhāva).


Why Contemporary People Need It

1. Breaking the Echo Chambers of the Algorithmic Mind

Contemporary life is mediated by algorithms—social media feeds, targeted notifications, and recommendation engines. Modern technology is essentially a massive, externalized Paratantra system: it feeds on your past behavioral seeds (*data history*), processes them through causal rules (*algorithms*), and displays specific pixels on your screen.

However, because most people lack an understanding of Paratantra, they live almost entirely in Parikalpita: * A provocative headline pops up (Paratantra). * The user instantly experiences outrage, constructs a narrative of "us vs. them," and sees the world as collapsing (Parikalpita).

Understanding Paratantra allows a contemporary person to step back and say: *"This outrage is an engineered causal output. Light pixels hit my eyes, triggering neural habit loops. The identity drama in my head is a projection."* This realization creates immediate cognitive space, preventing the algorithm from hijacking one's mental wellbeing.

2. A Bridge to Cognitive Science (And Its Limits)

Modern neuroscience and cognitive psychology describe the brain as a "predictive processing engine." The brain does not passively record the world; it generates a sensory model based on prior expectations, sensory inputs, and statistical predictions.

* Predictive models & neural firing match closely with Paratantra: a complex, physical-mental network of conditioned dependencies. * The perceived solid world & ego-narrative match with Parikalpita: the user-interface constructed by the brain's predictive models.

The Crucial Limitation: While neuroscience explains *how* the brain processes conditioned inputs (Paratantra), it often stops at a materialist framework, viewing consciousness merely as an accidental byproduct of biological hardware.

Yogācāra Buddhism goes further: it places Paratantra within the framework of liberation. It shows that Paratantra is not a cold, mechanical trap of biological determinism, but the very portal through which one can transcend delusion. When the false projections on Paratantra are recognized as empty, Paratantra turns out to be none other than the manifestation of ultimate reality (*Pariniṣpanna*).


Common Misinterpretations and Clarifications

Misinterpretation 1: "Paratantra means everything is totally fake and doesn't exist at all."

Clarification: This is a classic nihilistic mistake (*ucchedadṛṣṭi*). *Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra* explicitly warns against this [10966].

Paratantra is not complete non-existence. The physical sensation, the light signals, the brain activity, and the functioning of cause and effect *do happen*. They exist as dependently arisen phenomena (生无自性性—lacking *independent* self-existence, but existing *dependently*).

What is completely non-existent is Parikalpita—the intrinsic, permanent, independent self or object that you *think* is inside those phenomena.

If Paratantra were completely non-existent, there would be no canvas for illusion, no karma, no cause and effect, and ultimately no path to liberation [10966].

Misinterpretation 2: "Paratantra is just external nature or physical objects."

Clarification: Some readers narrow Paratantra to mean "external causes like environment or society."

In Yogācāra, Paratantra encompasses all conditioned factors—internal and external. It includes your thoughts, emotions, sub-conscious seeds (*bīja*), eye-consciousness, bodily organs, and physical objects [10969]. Every single aspect of the Five Aggregates operating under cause and condition is Paratantra.

Misinterpretation 3: "Paratantra and Pariniṣpanna are two separate, physical realities located in different places."

Clarification: Paratantra and Pariniṣpanna are not two different "things" in different realms; they are two ways of experiencing the exact same reality: * Paratantra + Misunderstanding (Parikalpita) = Samsara (The clear crystal looking stained). * Paratantra - Misunderstanding (Parikalpita) = Pariniṣpanna / Liberation (The clear crystal seen as it truly is) [10934].

When you thoroughly comprehend Paratantra as dependently arisen and empty of inherent selfhood, you do not destroy the dynamic universe—you simply see it clearly for the first time.


Summary: The Place of Paratantra in the Path to Liberation

Within the overall Buddhist path of liberation (解脱道), Paratantra-svabhāva is the central pivot.

If a seeker tries to eliminate suffering by attacking external objects, they fail, because external objects are merely conditioned appearances (Paratantra). If a seeker falls into despair thinking their negative emotions are permanent flaws of their soul, they fail, because they have mistaken a passing Paratantra process for a solid Parikalpita identity.

To achieve liberation, a practitioner stands firmly on the ground of Paratantra: 1. Observation: They observe every experience (thoughts, pain, joy, tech notifications) as a dependently arisen event (*"This has arisen because conditions met"*). 2. Deconstruction: They continuously strip away the false labels, ego-narratives, and dualistic claims (*Parikalpita*) attached to that event. 3. Realization: In the precise moment where Paratantra is stripped of Parikalpita, the luminous, unconditioned nature of reality (*Pariniṣpanna*) shines forth [10934].

By mastering the contemplation of Paratantra, one stops fighting with phantom illusions and learns to walk through the world with the clarity of a crystal—engaged in life's dynamic causes and conditions, yet completely unblemished by them.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

在《解深密经》(唐玄奘译,《解深密經》)中,“依他起相”作为唯识三性(遍计所执相、依他起相、圆成实相)之一,是理解唯识学说因果与现象界的核心概念。经中将“依他起相”明确定义为“一切法缘生自性”。这一自性遵循着佛教最基础的因缘生起规律,即“此有故彼有,此生故彼生”。在具体的流转现象中,它表现为“无明缘行,乃至招集纯大苦蕴”的十二有支因果链条。

在三相的相互关系中,依他起相扮演着承载与依托的关键角色。经中将其表述为“分别所行遍计所执相所依行相”。这意味着,有情在意识中所呈现的种种遍计所执的虚妄相状,必须依托依他起相这一缘生行相才能得以假名安立。经中特别强调,正是因为有依他起相和圆成实相的存在,遍计所执相才得以被设施与显现;若无此二相,遍计所执相则完全无从谈起。

二、 主要阐述

1. 依他起相与无自性性的关系

世尊在《解深密经》中,基于依他起相的特质,设施了两种“无自性性”: - 生无自性性:由于依他起相是“依他缘力故有,非自然有”,它并非自己独立、自然地产生,因此被安立为“生无自性性”。 - 一分胜义无自性性:在胜义的层面上,由于依他起相“非是清净所缘境界”,它不能直接作为清净智慧的所缘,因此它也被说为“胜义无自性性”的一分。

2. 经典比喻

为了让有情更好地理解依他起相的非真实性与依他性,经中使用了三个生动的比喻: - 眩翳众相喻:依他起相就如同患有眩翳眼病的人,其眼中所呈现出来的毛发、轮、蜂蝇,或者青、黄、赤、白等种种错乱的幻相。这些幻相虽有显现,但皆因病态眼力而起,并无真实自实体。 - 清净颇胝迦宝喻:依他起相本身如同清净无瑕的颇胝迦宝(即水晶)。当这块水晶与青、赤、黄、绿等不同的染色相合时,就会相应地显现出帝青、琥珀、真金等色。在这个比喻中,水晶本身比喻“依他起相”,而外在的染色与邪执,则比喻在依他起相上所产生的“遍计所执相言说习气”与执著。 - 幻像喻:生无自性性(即依他起相)以及一分胜义无自性性,其本质就如同魔术师所变现的“幻像”一般,虽有显现却无实质。

3. 杂染、流转与解脱的枢纽

依他起相是有情在生死中流转或走向还灭解脱的关键枢纽: - 杂染与流转:依他起相在性质上代表了“一切杂染相法”。有情因为愚痴,在依他起自性上产生增益,执著于遍计所执自性,从而产生言说熏习与执著。以此为因缘,又会产生当来世的依他起自性,导致有情在生死轮回中长时流转,受诸苦恼。 - 断惑与解脱:相反,如果菩萨能够于依他起相上,如实了知遍计所执相的本质是“无相之法”,就能彻底断灭一切杂染相法,进而证得清净相法,即圆成实相。 - 大乘总空性相:大乘佛教所宣说的“总空性相”,即是指在依他起相和圆成实相之中,毕竟远离一切品类的杂染与清净的遍计所执相,且于其中都无所得。 - 对未熟有情的引导:对于那些尚未种植善根的有情,佛陀依“生无自性性”(即依他起相的缘生特质)为彼宣说诸法,令其了知一切缘生行法皆是无常、变坏之法,从而使其心生厌离,断恶修善。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《解深密经》(《解深密經》)唐译本中,玄奘大师将此概念统一译为“依他起相”或“依他起自性”。在论述其应用范围时,译本采用了高度系统化的唯识与阿毗达磨术语。例如,在阐释依他起相的普遍性时,经文指出其广泛存在于“色蕴”及“余蕴”(即五蕴)、“十二处”、“十二有支”、“四种食”、“六界、十八界”等法中。这些法作为“分别所行遍计所执相所依行相”,其本质即是“依他起相”。此外,这一术语的应用还延伸至“苦谛”等四圣谛,以及“正定”等大乘修持法门中,表明一切缘生之法、修持之法在名言安立的背后,皆以依他起相为其实质依托。

四、 与相关概念的关系

- 与遍计所执相、圆成实相的关系:依他起相是遍计所执相的所依。正是因为有依他起相和圆成实相,遍计所执相才得以被设施。若能于依他起相上如实了知遍计所执相(无相之法),就能断灭杂染,证得圆成实相。 - 与无自性性的关系:依他起相对应“生无自性性”与“一分胜义无自性性”。 - 与空性的关系:大乘的“总空性相”即是在依他起相和圆成实相中,毕竟远离遍计所执相,且于其中都无所得。

五、 代表性原文引用

- “云何诸法依他起相?谓一切法缘生自性。则此有故彼有,此生故彼生,所谓无明缘行,乃至招集纯大苦蕴。” - “依他起相者,此是分别所行遍计所执相所依行相。” - “若诸菩萨于依他起相上,如实了知遍计所执相,即能断灭一切杂染相法,证得圆成实相。”

By SutraAI-generated

解深密經T0676 · 經集部

《解深密經》以「依他起相」為三相(遍計所執相、依他起相、圓成實相)之一,全經始終使用「依他起相」這一完整術語,未見「依他起性」「緣起性」等異稱。其核心定義出自佛告德本菩薩:「謂一切法緣生自性,則此有故彼有,此生故彼生,謂無明緣行,乃至招集純大苦蘊。」 即以十二因緣的流轉門為依他起相的具體內容,將「緣生自性」與「此有故彼有」的緣起公式直接等同於依他起相之體性。

經中以兩組譬喻闡明依他起相與餘二相的關係。其一為眩瞖喻:眩瞖人眼中所現髮毛、蜂蠅、青黃赤白等亂相,喻依他起相;淨眼人所見無亂境界,喻圓成實相。其二為頗胝迦寶(水晶)喻:清淨頗胝迦寶本身喻依他起相;寶上染色喻「依他起相上遍計所執相言說習氣」;於寶上邪執帝青、琥珀、金等相喻「依他起相上遍計所執相執」。此喻明確揭示:依他起相是遍計所執相的所依載體,遍計所執相是附加於依他起相上的言說習氣與妄執。

經文進一步給出三相的認知次第:「相名相應以為緣故,遍計所執相而可了知;依他起相上遍計所執相執以為緣故,依他起相而可了知;依他起相上遍計所執相無執以為緣故,圓成實相而可了知。」 在修證層面,如實了知依他起相即能了知一切雜染相法;於依他起相上了知無相之法,即能斷滅雜染、證得清淨。

本經獨特的理論貢獻在於將依他起相與三無自性性對接:依他起相即「生無自性性」,理由是「此由依他緣力故有,非自然有」;同時依他起相亦屬「一分勝義無自性性」,因為「依他起相非是清淨所緣境界」。這表明依他起相雖是緣生有法,卻非勝智所緣的清淨境,故在勝義層面亦說為無自性。

勝義生菩薩領解佛意後,將依他起相界定為「分別所行遍計所執相所依行相」,即遍計所執相之所依的底層行相,並遍推於五蘊、十二處、十二有支、四種食、六界、十八界、四聖諦、三十七道品等一切法門。經中又嚴厲警告:若撥無依他起相與圓成實相為無相,則遍計所執相亦無從施設,是為「誹撥三相」的無見無相見。

最後,佛告慈氏菩薩大乘「總空性相」:「若於依他起相及圓成實相中,一切品類雜染、清淨遍計所執相,畢竟遠離性,及於此中都無所得。」 空性並非否定依他起相本身,而是於依他起相上遠離一切遍計所執,這構成了本經對依他起相最究竟的定位。

瑜伽師地論T1579 · 瑜伽部

《瑜伽師地論》論「依他起相」,主要透過轉引《解深密經》三相說而展開,並輔以緣生法與因相之定義,構成多層次的說明。

一、核心定義。本論引《解深密經》佛告德本菩薩:諸法相略有三種——遍計所執相、依他起相、圓成實相;其中「諸法依他起相」即「一切法緣生自性」,以「此有故彼有,此生故彼生」為公式,並舉「無明緣行,乃至招集純大苦蘊」為具體內容。又於無自性性處明言:「諸法生無自性性」即「諸法依他起相」,理由是「此由依他緣力故有,非自然有」,故說名生無自性性;且因依他起相「非是清淨所緣境界」,亦兼攝於「勝義無自性性」之一分。

二、作為二相之所依。本論引勝義生菩薩領解:「分別所行遍計所執相所依行相,是名依他起相」,世尊依此施設生無自性性及一分勝義無自性性;即於此所依行相中,由遍計所執不成實故,法無我真如清淨所緣,是名圓成實相。此模式遍用於五蘊、十二處、十二有支、四食、六界、十八界、四聖諦乃至念住、正斷、道支等一切法。本論並於破邪執處強調:「由有依他起相及圓成實相故,遍計所執相方可施設」,若撥依他起、圓成實為無相,即並遍計所執而誹撥三相。

三、譬喻。本論引清淨頗胝迦寶(水晶)之喻:清淨頗胝迦寶本身喻依他起相;其上所有染色相應,喻「依他起相上遍計所執相言說習氣」;於帝青、大青、虎珀、末羅羯多、金等起邪執,喻「依他起相上遍計所執相執」。又說依他起相上由遍計所執相「於常常時、於恒恒時,無有真實,無自性性」,此即圓成實相。另以眩瞖人眼中所現髮毛輪、蜂蠅、苣蕂、青黃赤白等相差別喻依他起相,與遍計所執相之眩瞖過患、淨眼人之無亂境界(圓成實相)對舉。

四、了知次第與修證。本論引經:「相名相應以為緣故,遍計所執相而可了知;依他起相上遍計所執相執以為緣故,依他起相而可了知;依他起相上遍計所執相無執以為緣故,圓成實相而可了知。」菩薩於依他起相上如實了知遍計所執相,即能了知無相之法、斷滅雜染相法、證得清淨相法,齊此名為「於諸法相善巧菩薩」。

五、與緣生法、因相之呼應。本論另處定義「緣生法」:無主宰、無作者、無受者、無自作用、不得自在,「從因而生,託眾緣轉,本無而有,有已散滅」,唯法所顯、唯法能潤、唯法所潤,墮在相續;又說因等相:由此為先、此為建立、此和合故,彼法或生、或得、或成、或辦、或用。此二定義與依他起相「依他緣力故有,非自然有」之義互相發明。

術語方面,本論一律作「依他起相」,與「遍計所執相」「圓成實相」並稱三相;其體性則以「緣生自性」「緣生法」稱之。

成唯識論T1585 · 瑜伽部

《成唯識論》以「依他起」為三自性之一,與遍計所執、圓成實性並列,三者皆依第八識而有,離第八識皆不得有。論中釋名云:「二所依體,實託緣生,此性非無,名依他起,虛妄分別緣所生故」,又總括曰「依他眾緣而得起故」,即以眾緣和合而生為其定義。

關於依他起之體性範圍,論中並存兩說。第一義謂三界有漏心心所由無始虛妄熏習,體一而似見、相二分生,此二分「情有理無」屬遍計所執,其所依託緣生之體方名依他起。第二義則擴而大之,謂一切心心所由熏習力所變二分,從緣生故亦依他起,遍計依斯妄執定實有無、一異等,方名遍計所執;此義引聖教「唯量、唯二、唯種種皆名依他起」及「相等四法、十一識等論皆說為依他起攝」為證,並難前義云:若二分是遍計所執,則應如兔角非所緣緣、不能熏成種,故結歸「眾緣所生心、心所體及相、見分,有漏、無漏皆依他起」。論又調和云:頌言「分別緣所生」且說染分依他,淨分依他亦圓成故;或諸染淨心心所皆名分別,能緣慮故,則一切染淨依他皆攝於依他起中。

依他起與遍計所執之關係,論引《攝大乘》說「依他起是遍計心等所緣緣故」為所遍計;遍計所執雖是彼境而非所緣緣,故非所遍計。依他起與圓成實之關係則為「不即不離」:「於彼依他起上,常遠離前遍計所執,二空所顯真如為性」即圓成實,故二者非異非不異,喻如無常性與諸行法。論又明修證次第:非不證見圓成實而能見依他起性,無分別智證真如已,後得智中方能了達依他起性「如幻事、陽焰、夢境、鏡像、光影、谷響、水月、變化所成,非有似有」。

論依三性立三無性,其中「依次依他立生無性,此如幻事託眾緣生,無如妄執自然性故,假說無性,非性全無」,此為佛密意說一切法無自性之深旨。

於轉依義中,論明「依謂所依,即依他起,與染淨法為所依故」,染即遍計所執,淨即圓成實;菩薩數修無分別智,「轉捨依他起上遍計所執,轉得依他起中圓成實性」,由轉煩惱得大涅槃、轉所知障證無上覺。

末後論辨身土相分云:「相分等依識變現,非如識性依他中實」,然「識相、見等從緣生,俱依他起,虛實如識,唯言遣外,不遮內境」,以此成立唯識中道之旨。

Related