Dharma · AI Companion

遍計所執性

parikalpitasvabhāva

唯识三性中由虚妄分别执成之性。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span III · nominal designationInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

初立层=究竟第三重:作为三性安立的一分,与依他起、圆成实同处第三重。须并记两点分歧:①功能上遍计所执性即「所破的实有执」,单看其对治功能更贴近第一→二重的转折,但作为三性体系中的术语,其完整安立仍在第三重;②〔中观:三性能否被四重二谛收编本身即判教立场〕〔唯识:遍计所执唯无、依他起有,空有分际由此立〕。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Talking About

In Yogācāra (唯識) philosophy, human suffering is not born from the objective world itself, but from how the mind projects, interprets, and clings to that world. To explain this cognitive trap, classical sutras such as the *Lankāvatāra Sūtra* (*楞伽阿跋多羅寶經*) and the *Ghanavyūha Sūtra* (*大乘密嚴經*) establish the framework of the Three Natures (三自性). Among them, 妄想自性 (*parikalpita-svabhāva*—translated as "Imagined Nature" or "Solely Imagined Nature," also known in later translations as *遍計性* or *遍計所執性*, "Everywhere-Conceptualized Nature") represents the fundamental illusion of ordinary beings [8185, 11041].

At its core, 妄想自性 refers to the state wherein ordinary beings, failing to realize that external phenomena are manifestations of their own mind (自心現量), project arbitrary names and concepts onto interdependent phenomena (緣起事相), thereby clinging to a false, self-existent reality of subject and object (能取與所取) [8185, 8586].

To fully grasp this concept, we must understand its place within the broader Buddhist path to liberation, its precise components, and its classical classifications.


1. The Genesis: "Imagined Nature Arises from Appearance" (*妄想自性從相生*)

The *Lankāvatāra Sūtra* famously states: *"Imagined Nature arises from appearance"* (*妄想自性從相生*) [8185], and *"Based on Interdependent Nature (緣起自性), Imagined Nature arises"* (*依緣起自性,起妄想自性*) [8179].

How does this process unfold? * Interdependent Nature (緣起自性 / 依他起性): The actual stream of causal phenomena. Causes and conditions coalesce to produce temporary forms, sensations, and cognitive impressions [8179, 11054]. * The Cognitive Ignorance: Ordinary beings do not realize that these perceptions are mere manifestations of their own Storehouse Consciousness (阿賴耶識 / 藏識) [8179]. * The Projection of Subject and Object (能取/所取): The mind splits reality into the "grasper" (攝受者 / 能取—the illusory "I" or subjective mind) and the "grasped" (攝受 / 所取—the external world, objects, and people) [8586]. * Conceptual Superimposition (名相): The *Ghanavyūha Sūtra* explains: *"Names arise from appearances, appearances arise from dependent origination"* (*名從於相生,相從因緣起*) [10904, 11054]. The mind attaches language, labels, and conceptual structures (名言) to these fluid appearances, mistaking abstract labels for inherently existent entities [10904, 11040].

Through this process, what is merely a passing, condition-dependent appearance is solidified into a rigid, self-existent entity with an intrinsic nature (自性). This solidified, projected reality is precisely 妄想自性 [8185, 11041].


2. The Two Branches and Twelve Dimensions

The *Lankāvatāra Sūtra* systematically breaks down 妄想自性 into precise structures [8185, 8422]:

##### The Two Primary Aspects (二種妄想自性): 1. Attachment to Names and Signs (名相計著相): Deep-seated cognitive clinging to linguistic terms, definitions, and mental labels assigned to internal and external phenomena [8185]. 2. Attachment to Specific and Common Characteristics (事相計著相): Deep-seated cognitive clinging to the concrete or abstract physical/mental attributes (such as impermanence vs. permanence, solidity, form, or boundaries) of inner and outer objects [8185].

##### The Twelve Generic Dimensions of Conceptual Distortions (十二種妄想自性分別通相): The sutra further itemizes twelve specific ways the mind constructs imaginary reality [8422]: 1. Verbal Projection (言說妄想): Clinging to pleasing or displeasing vocal sounds and linguistic expressions [8422]. 2. Referential Projection (所說事妄想): Mistaking the actual realities known by noble wisdom as mere verbal concepts [8422]. 3. Attribute Projection (相妄想): Clinging to sensory characteristics like solidity, fluidity, heat, or motion (the four great elements) as intrinsically real [8422]. 4. Gain/Value Projection (利妄想): Obsessively projecting inherent value onto wealth, gold, or silver [8422]. 5. Self-Nature Projection (自性妄想): Deludedly positing that phenomena possess an unchangeable, independent essence [8422]. 6. Causality Projection (因妄想): Conceptualizing existence or non-existence in terms of rigid causal relationships [8422]. 7. View Projection (見妄想): Clinging to dogmatic philosophical views, such as eternalism, annihilationism, unity, or diversity [8422]. 8. Establishment Projection (成妄想): Deludedly establishing fixed dogmas regarding "Self" (我) and "Mine" (我所) [8422]. 9. Arising Projection (生妄想): Believing that things intrinsically "arise" out of existence or non-existence [8422]. 10. Non-Arising Projection (不生妄想): Nihilistically holding that all things never arise at all without cause [8422]. 11. Continuity Projection (相續妄想): Imagining an unbroken, solid thread connecting past, present, and future selfhood (like a continuous thread of gold) [8422]. 12. Bondage and Liberation Projection (縛不縛妄想): Conceptualizing bondage and enlightenment as external states to be acquired or escaped [8422].


3. Mapping to the Five Dharmas (五法)

To show where 妄想自性 sits in the entire path to liberation, Mahāyāna texts map it alongside the Five Dharmas (五法) [8702, 8705]: * Name (名): Linguistic labels $\rightarrow$ 妄想自性 (Imagined Nature) [11054]. * Appearance (相): Causal phenomena and perceptions $\rightarrow$ 緣起自性 (Interdependent Nature) [8705, 11054]. * Conceptualization (妄想 / 分別): The active mental discrimination that binds Name to Appearance [8702]. * Right Wisdom (正智) & Suchness (如如): Seeing through names and appearances, abiding in reality as it is $\rightarrow$ 成自性 / 圓成實性 / 第一義 (Consummate Nature / Ultimate Reality) [8702, 8705, 11054].

Crucially, the sutras point out: "Imagined Nature exists subjectively, but in Interdependent Reality, it is completely non-existent" (*妄想自性有,於緣起則無*) [8424]. The label and the attached expectation are purely mental projections; they do not exist inside the dependent phenomena themselves [11040, 11041].


4. The Classical Metaphors: Preserving the Exact Mappings

The *Lankāvatāra* and *Ghanavyūha* sutras use vivid, precise analogies to unpack how 妄想自性 tricks consciousness. Each metaphor matches a distinct aspect of delusional projection:

| Metaphor | Canonical Reference | Precise Classical Mapping | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Rabbit Horns vs. Cow Horns (兔角與牛角) | *Lankāvatāra Sūtra* [8176, 8403] | Duality of Existence and Non-Existence (有無二見): Externalists see a cow with horns and deduce that "a rabbit has no horns." Both "having" and "lacking" are conceptual traps built on dualistic contrast. When analyzed down to atomic particles, neither horn possesses inherent existence [8176, 8403]. | | 3D Perception in Flat Paintings (平畫起高下想) | *Lankāvatāra Sūtra* [8394] | Projection of Depth on Flat Reality: Just as an uneducated person looks at a 2D painting and imagines true depth, heights, and valleys, ordinary beings project real selfhood, intrinsic qualities, and hierarchy onto flat, empty phenomena [8394]. | | Floaters / Cataracts in Cataract Eyes (翳目看空中垂髮) | *Lankāvatāra Sūtra* [8394, 8599] | Subjective Projection Taken as External Fact: Someone with cataracts sees hair-like threads floating in empty air and insists they are real objects. Similarly, consciousness mistaking its own internal seeds for external objects [8394, 8599]. | | Water Bubbles Mistaken for Mani Pearls (水泡認作摩尼珠) | *Lankāvatāra Sūtra* [8394] | Chasing Transient Forms for Solid Worth: Fools chase transient water bubbles expecting to grasp indestructible jewels, just as people chase ephemeral mental states for permanent happiness [8394]. | | Silkworm Spinning a Cocoon (蠶作繭自縛) | *Lankāvatāra Sūtra* [8596, 8702] | Self-Entrapment Through Conceptual Weaving: The silkworm spins silk out of its own body until it traps itself inside. Human beings spin threads of concepts, names, and emotional attachments until they lock themselves in the ocean of birth and death (Samsara) [8596, 8702]. | | Illusions, Dreams, Mirages, Moon in Water (幻夢陽焰水中月) | *Ghanavyūha Sūtra* [11040] | Lack of Substantial Being: Phenomena appear vividly, yet when grasped, possess no tangible essence. They exist "according to conceptualization, but have no localized substance or utility" (*隨分別有,體用無所在*) [11041]. |


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life

To see how 妄想自性 operates, let us trace a common modern scenario: Working late, getting a message from a boss or partner, and reading social media while commuting.

``` [1. Interdependent Phase (緣起/依他起性)] Light waves from phone screen -> Photons hit retina -> Neural signals sent -> "相" (Raw Visual/Auditory Appearance)

[2. Conceptual & Naming Phase (妄想/遍計性)] Brain applies label: "Ignored message" / "Unfair criticism" -> "名" (Names & Concept Superimposition)

[3. Duality & Attachment Phase (能取與所取)] "I" (能取) vs "The Hostile World" (所取) -> "事相/名相計著" (Clinging to rigid traits & identities)

[4. Entrapment Phase (蠶作繭自縛)] Ruminating, anxiety, identity crisis -> Silkworm cocooning itself in imaginary danger. ```

Step 1: The Raw Experience (Interdependent Nature / 依他起性)

It is 10:00 PM. You are on the subway train. Your phone vibrates. A push notification appears from your team manager: *"Let's review your deck tomorrow morning at 8 AM. Need major revisions."* * The Classical Mapping: At this exact micro-second, there are only photons hitting your retina, electronic displays, language code, and sensory signals firing in your brain. This is the realm of Interdependent Nature (緣起自性 / 相) [8179, 11054]. It is a temporary flow of causes and conditions [10904].

Step 2: Superimposing Names and Attributes (名相計著相)

Within milliseconds, your mind goes beyond the sensory input: * You attach labels: *"Disaster," "Passive-aggressive tone," "Incompetence," "Threat to my career"* (名相計著相—Attachment to Names/Labels) [8185]. * You assign fixed, intrinsic attributes to your boss and yourself: *"My boss is an unreasonable tyrant"* (assigning a fixed self-nature to another) and *"I am a failure who will never achieve security"* (事相計著相—Attachment to Specific/Common Characteristics) [8185].

Step 3: Splitting Subject and Object (能取與所取)

Your heart begins to race. You feel isolated on the train. * The Trap of Duality: You feel a solid, vulnerable "Me" (能取 / 攝受者—The Grasper) trapped inside your body, facing an aggressive, solid "External Reality" (所取 / 攝受—The Grasped) [8586]. * The Classical Reality: You fail to see 自心現量 (that your current panic, the perceived "hostility" in the text, and the catastrophe playing in your mind are entirely internal cognitive projections constructed by your own Storehouse Consciousness) [8179, 8586].

Step 4: Spin the Cocoon (蠶作繭自縛)

You spend the rest of the commute mentally rehearsing arguments, imagining getting fired, calculating mortgage defaults, and scrolling through social media feeds comparing yourself to successful peers (利妄想—Gain Projection; 相續妄想—Continuity Projection) [8422]. * Like the silkworm spinning a cocoon (*蠶作繭自縛*) [8596], the text message itself was just black pixels on a glowing glass rectangle. But you spun miles of mental silk—fears, identities, past regrets, future catastrophes—until you are physically trembling, trapped inside a cage of your own mental making.

Where People Mis-map This Concept:

* Mis-mapping 1: Thinking the *phone* or the *job* is 妄想自性. * *Correction:* The physical phone, the text, and the workplace are part of Interdependent Nature (緣起自性) [8179]. The 妄想自性 is the superimposed projection that the text has an *inherent, fixed threat-nature* that exists independently outside your mind [8424]. * Mis-mapping 2: Confusing "Conceptual Projection" with "Visual Hallucination." * *Correction:* You genuinely saw real pixels (sensory appearance). But mistaking those pixels for a solid, inherently real threat to a solid, inherently real self is like seeing 3D depth in a flat painting (*平畫起高下想*) [8394].


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary humans live in an era unprecedentedly dominated by engineered 妄想自性.

1. The Algorithmic Reality & Digital Projection

Social media, generative AI, and modern digital ecosystems do not merely present facts; they build personalized echo chambers designed to trigger 名相計著相 (attachment to names and signs) [8185]. * The AI Analogy: Large Language Models (LLMs) operate on token predictions based on statistical patterns. They do not possess a feeling, living self, yet humans constantly anthropomorphize them, projecting emotional intent or consciousness onto code. This is a classic contemporary manifestation of 妄想自性. * The Limits of the Analogy: While an AI model processes external digital data through code, human consciousness (藏識 / 阿賴耶識) projects the very canvas of sensory experience itself [8179]. AI science analyzes functional data processing; Buddhist wisdom directly dismantles the subjective illusion of ownership and inherent existence ("I" and "Mine") [8586]. Neuroscience shows how the brain builds predictive models of reality (predictive processing), which aligns with the Buddhist idea that perception is constructed. However, neuroscience often stops at functional brain mechanics, whereas Buddhist insight uses this understanding to dismantle suffering at its spiritual root.

2. Identity Traps and Mental Burnout

Modern culture urges individuals to solidify their identities—personal brands, social statuses, political affiliations, diagnostic labels. When you treat your job title, your diagnosed anxiety, or your social standing as an unchangeable, intrinsically real essence (自性妄想), any shift in external circumstances feels like existential annihilation [8422]. Recognizing 妄想自性 provides an immediate cognitive release: the label is not the territory; the conceptual construct is not the living flow.


Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications

To maintain the rigorous accuracy of classical Buddhism, we must address several widespread misconceptions:

Misunderstanding 1: "Since it is 妄想自性 (imagined), does it mean external objects don't exist at all, and Buddhism is pure nihilism?"

* Clarification: Buddhism does not deny the existence of causal phenomena (緣起自性 / 依他起性). It denies the inherent, self-existent nature (自性) that the mind projects onto those phenomena [8179, 8424]. The classical text states: *"Imagined Nature exists [as a subjective mental habit], but in Interdependent Reality, it does not exist"* (*妄想自性有,於緣起則無*) [8424]. Fire burns, and water wets (interdependent functionality), but the rigid mental concepts of "good/bad," "mine/yours," or "eternal self" attached to them are imaginary projections [11041].

Misunderstanding 2: "Is 妄想自性 just ordinary 'thinking' or 'having ideas'?"

* Clarification: No. In classical texts, "thinking" as a psychological function is part of the mental factors (心數法 / 心所). 妄想自性 specifically refers to the *fundamental cognitive error* of grasping those mental thoughts as possessing ultimate, independent reality (clinging to 能取/所取 and 我/我所) [8586]. It is not the presence of thought, but the reification (treating an abstract concept as a concrete reality) and deep-seated attachment to that thought [8185].

Misunderstanding 3: "If everything is 妄想自性, then spiritual enlightenment (圓成實性) must also be a delusion?"

* Clarification: The *Ghanavyūha Sūtra* notes that even the concept of ultimate reality can be falsely conceptualized (*究竟圓成性亦被妄所計*) [10904]. If one turns "Enlightenment" or "Nirvana" into a static concept to chase, it degenerates back into 妄想自性 (縛不縛妄想—Bondage/Liberation Projection) [8422]. However, true Consummate Nature (圓成實性 / 第一義) is precisely the complete absence of 妄想自性 on the basis of Interdependent Nature—it is Right Wisdom (正智) directly experiencing Suchness (如如) free from conceptual superimposition [8702, 11054].


Summary: The Path Beyond the Illusion

Understanding 妄想自性 is not an academic exercise in vocabulary; it is the ultimate diagnostic tool for human liberation.

When you realize that your deepest fears, rigid self-concepts, and emotional anguish are like flat paintings mistaken for 3D abysses [8394], or cataract floaters mistaken for real objects in the sky [8599], the grip of compulsion breaks. By applying Right Wisdom (正智), one steps away from rigid names and appearances, rests in Suchness (如如) [8702, 11054], cuts through the self-woven cocoon [8596], and awakens to the untrammeled reality of mind.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义 「妄想自性」(梵语:parikalpita-svabhāva)是唯识学说的核心概念之一。在《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》中,妄想自性与「缘起自性」、「成自性」并称为「三自性」。经中指出「妄想自性从相生」,其核心在于凡夫不能了知「自心现量」(即外境皆是自心显现),执著于「摄受及摄受者」(能取与所取)的境界,堕入有无二见,在心与心数法中生起「我、我所」的执着,这便是妄想自性的生起根源。而在《大乘密严经》中,此概念主要被称为「遍计性」或「遍计之自性」。该经指出,诸法本无生灭、不断亦不常、不一亦不异、不来亦不去,但众生在其中「妄立种种名」,在虚妄之相中产生「妄所取」的执着,即是遍计性。世间万物皆非真实,是「妄情之所执」,只是「随分别有,体用无所在」,诸法「无共无自性,体性皆非有,但是所分别」,这就是遍计之自性的本质。

二、 主要阐述 1. 妄想自性的生起因缘与名言执着 妄想自性与缘起自性有着密切的依托关系。《楞伽经》以幻师依草木瓦石作种种幻术为喻,说明「依缘起自性,起妄想自性」。凡夫在缘起自性的事相上,产生种种妄想心、想行事妄想相,并因计着习气而使妄想自性相续生起。《大乘密严经》则进一步阐明名、相、分别与遍计性的关系,指出「名从于相生,相从因缘起」,由于种种形相,众生起于分别。凡夫对种种形相、名句及文身等产生执着,因而「成于遍计性」。这种遍计性具体表现为「由彼彼名诠,以名彼彼法,于彼不可得」。一切世间法都不离名与色,若离开了能诠,所诠便不可得,这种能诠与所诠的虚妄关系,即是遍计性,经中亦直接将此遍计性称为「世间」。 2. 妄想自性的分类 《楞伽经》对妄想自性进行了多维度的分类: - 二种妄想自性:即「名相计着相」与「事相计着相」。前者指对内外法的名相产生计着;后者指对内外法的自相与共相产生计着。 - 十二种妄想自性分别通相:包括言说妄想、所说事妄想、相妄想、利妄想、自性妄想、因妄想、见妄想、成妄想、生妄想、不生妄想、相续妄想、缚不缚妄想。 3. 经典譬喻 为了说明妄想自性的虚妄无实,经典中使用了丰富的譬喻: - 兔角与牛角:外道因见牛有角而作「兔无角」之想,这种待对而生的有无见即是邪想。实际上,微尘分析推求,牛角与兔角皆无自性,凡夫却在无所有中妄想计着。 - 画像与翳目:愚夫在平面的画像中产生高下(立体)的妄想;又如翳眼之人看见空中垂发,妄执为实有。 - 水泡与摩尼珠:愚人将水泡误认为摩尼宝珠而追逐。 - 蚕作茧:凡夫因妄想自缠,如同蚕作茧自缚,堕入生死海中。 - 幻梦等:诸法犹如幻、梦、干城、阳焰、水中月等,在这些虚妄之相中妄所取。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异 在不同经典及译本中,此概念及其关联术语的表述存在显著差异: 1. 妄想自性与遍计性:在刘宋求那跋陀罗译的《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》中,该概念被译为「妄想自性」;而在唐不空译的《大乘密严经》中,则统一使用「遍计性」或「遍计之自性」。 2. 三自性的译名:求那跋陀罗译本将三自性译为「妄想自性」、「缘起自性」与「成自性」;而不空译本则将圆成实性称为「究竟圆成性」、「具实」以及「第一义」。 3. 五法中的「分别」:在「五法」架构中,《楞伽经》将其表述为「名、相、妄想、正智、如如」,此处的「妄想」在后译中多被译为「分别」,其定义为「施设众名,显示诸相」。 4. 阿赖耶识的译名:两经均使用了「藏识」这一译语,《密严经》中亦同时使用「赖耶」。

四、 与相关概念的关系 1. 与缘起自性的关系:妄想自性依托于缘起自性而生起。修行者需了知「妄想自性有,于缘起则无」。 2. 与五法的结合: - 《楞伽经》指出,「名、相、虚妄想」对应了自性的前两种(即妄想自性与缘起自性),而「正智、如如」则对应了「成自性」(成相)。 - 《密严经》则明确指出:「名」即是「遍计性」,「相」是「依他起」,而「远离于名相」则是「第一义」(圆成实性)。此外,究竟圆成性亦会被「妄所计」。 3. 与藏识的关系:藏识能顿时分别自心所现及身心安立的受用境界。 4. 与解脱的关系:若能通达「自心现妄想之相」,并以「正智」不立名相、住于「如如」,便能「净除妄想,照明诸地」,最终超越外道与二乘,逮得如来常住法身。

五、 代表性原文引用 1. 「妄想自性从相生。」——《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》 2. 「依缘起自性,起妄想自性。」——《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》 3. 「妄想自性有,于缘起则无。」——《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》 4. 「名从于相生,相从因缘起,由彼彼名诠,以名彼彼法,于彼不可得,如是等分别,成于遍计性。」——《大乘密严经》 5. 「无共无自性,体性皆非有,但是所分别,是名遍计之自性。」——《大乘密严经》 6. 「名即遍计性,相是依他起,远离于名相,此即第一义。」——《大乘密严经>」

By SutraAI-generated

楞伽阿跋多羅寶經T0670 · 經集部

本部《楞伽阿跋多羅寶經》不以「遍計所執性」立名,然其三自性之說中所施設之「妄想自性」即對應遍計所執之義。以下依經文歸納本經之論述要點:

一、獨特用語——以「妄想自性」施設:經中明列三自性為「妄想自性、緣起自性、成自性」,其中「妄想自性」即遍計所執之義。此乃本經之特殊用語,與其他經論常用之「遍計所執性」一名有別,讀者宜知其同名異譯之關係。

二、生起之由——從相而生:經云「妄想自性從相生」,又謂「緣起自性事相相,行顯現事相相,計著有二種妄想自性」,顯示遍計所執乃依緣起之事相顯現,於其上計著而成。

三、二種計著相:經中將妄想自性之相開為二種:(一)「名相計著相」——謂於內外法上計著名字與表相;(二)「事相計著相」——謂即於彼內外自共相上計著其事實之相。此二種計著即構成遍計所執之具體內容。

四、依緣起而施設、如幻不實:經云「計著緣起自性,生妄想自性相」,「計著緣起而計著者,種種妄想計著自性」;又云「依緣起自性,起妄想自性」。以幻師依草木瓦石作種種幻為喻,彼種種形色起眾生種種妄想,而「彼諸妄想亦無真實」。此明妄執乃依他施設,體性如幻,非有真實自性。

五、凡聖所見之別:經中區分愚夫與聖智之見:愚夫執「性自性妄想真實」,「以自相境界為境界」;聖智則以「聖知、聖見、聖慧眼」知其不實,故經云「我不說性自性相」、「但我住自得如實空法,離惑亂相見,離自心現性非性見」。

六、修行離著之教誡:經勸菩薩「如幻緣起妄想自性,異不異、有無莫計著」,不應於妄想自性上起種種分別執計;並以「說空法」令眾生離無始以來「性自性相」之計著相見。又前段云菩薩應「善知周遍觀察人法無我,淨除妄想,照明諸地」,以此為入自覺聖智之方便。

大乘密嚴經T0682 · 經集部

本經論述「遍計所執性」時,恆以略稱「遍計性」出之,未見「遍計所執性」之全稱(),此為用詞上一可注意之處。經中將三性之架構扣緊「名」「相」二者而立,明確宣說:「名為遍計性,相是依他起,遠離於名相,是名第一義」();又言「名從於相生,相從因緣起,此二生分別」(),以「名」之施設為遍計性之核心。

就其內容,經文從多面詮釋此性。其一,以「妄立種種名」為遍計性之本質,謂世人依種種名言而施設諸法,名言所指實不可得,故「由彼彼名詮,以名彼彼法,於彼不可得,是為遍計性」()。其二,就所執之境而言,「諸法猶如幻、如夢與乾城、陽焰、水中月、火輪、雲雷等,此中妄所取,是為遍計性」(),以幻化等喻顯所取之虛妄。其三,就體用而言,「體用無所在,是為遍計性」();又謂「但是所分別,遍計之自性」(),將其歸於純然之分別所計度者。其四,結歸世間:「一切世間法,不離於名色,若離於能詮,所詮不可得,如是遍計性,我說為世間」(),將遍計性與世間之成立相繫。其五,強調其為「妄情之所執」之結果,「妄情之所執,遍計無有餘」();又云「如是執著生,成於遍計性」(),指出執著即為此性之成因。

與三性之關聯上,本經特別將「名」配屬遍計性、「相」配屬依他起(「相從因緣起」),而「遠離於名相」者方為第一義(圓成實性)。能遠離此分別者名為正智:「名從於相生,相從因緣起,此二生分別,諸法性如如,於斯善觀察,是名為正智」()。經中亦以「賴耶」「藏識」之詞取代常見之阿賴耶稱呼,如「賴耶與七識,當知亦復然,習氣繩所牽」()、「藏識一切種,習氣所纏覆」(),亦屬本經用詞之特點。

瑜伽師地論T1579 · 瑜伽部

《瑜伽師地論》對遍計所執自性之論述極為詳備,茲依該論所出歸納其要點如下:

一、定義與基本義涵:遍計所執自性指「諸所有名言安立諸法自性,依假名言,數數周遍計度諸法而建立」;又釋為「隨言說、依假名言建立自性」。其本質為虛妄分別所增益,於依他起自性及圓成實自性之上增益為有,故稱「增益邊」。

二、別名異稱:能詮相即遍計所執自性相,該論廣列別名:「亦名遍計所執,亦名和合所成,亦名所增益相,亦名虛妄所執,亦名言說所顯,亦名文字加行,亦名唯有音聲,亦名無有體相」。

三、分類:略分五種——遍計義自性、遍計名自性、遍計雜染自性、遍計清淨自性、遍計非雜染清淨自性;遍計義自性又分四種:遍計自相、遍計差別相、遍計所取相、遍計能取相。依名與義相互涉入另分五種:依名遍計義、依義遍計名、依名遍計名、依義遍計義、依二遍計二。執著分加行執與名施設執二種;加行執復有貪愛、瞋恚、合會、別離、捨隨與五種;名施設執復有非文字所作與文字所作二種;微細執著中亦有「於諸相中遍計所執自性執」。

四、所依止與認知途徑:遍計所執自性依止相、名、分別三事;應「緣於相、名相屬」而了知。

五、與三自性、三無性之關聯:三自性中,遍計所執自性由「相無自性性」說無自性;三解脫門中由遍計所執自性立空解脫門;三種無生忍中由遍計所執自性立本性無生忍。該論又明言遍計所執自性「都非智所行,以無相故」;三自性中遍計所執自性應遍知、應永斷。

六、五種作用(業):一生依他起自性,二於彼得起言說,三生補特伽羅執,四生法執,五攝受二執習氣麁重。

七、了知遍計所執之相:當知「唯有其名、唯遍計執,無相、無性、無生、無滅、無染、無淨,本來寂靜、自性涅槃」;其體微細,以虛空為喻。

八、與法無我之關係:善了知遍計所執自性及世俗言名,能除一切彼所依相,名映一切,用顯法無我。三世三輪清淨,亦依遍計所執自性以如實慧正觀察三世諸法,斷顧戀希望染著。

九、勝用與過患:若無遍計所執自性,依他起自性中應無名言、無名言執,雜染清淨應不可知;然愚夫於依他起、圓成實上增益遍計所執自性,由言說熏習,於當來世長時流轉生死。

Related