Dharma · AI Companion

ghrāṇa

能觉知香气的鼻根。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

六根法数于蕴处界(第一重实有→缘生)完整教授,般若读为性空(第二重)。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

鼻 (ghrāṇa) is one of the six inner sense bases (六內入處, ṣaḍ āyatana) or the five sense faculties (五根, pañcendriya) in Buddhism—the olfactory sense organ that perceives fragrance and stench, and that bears directly on the round of birth and death and on cultivation toward liberation.


What This Concept Is Saying

Within the liberative framework of Buddhism, the "nose" (鼻, ghrāṇa) is by no means merely a physiological organ for breathing or smelling. It is one of the pivotal junctures through which sentient beings construct worldly experience, fall into the round of birth and death, and—conversely—attain final liberation.

Within the classical architecture, the nose is one of the six inner sense bases (eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, mind) and one of the five sense faculties at the sensory level. Its basic mechanism of operation is this: the nose-faculty (鼻根), functioning as the inner sense base, contacts the odor-object (香塵, gandha-viṣaya, the objective field of smell), which is the corresponding outer sense base, and thereby arouses olfactory consciousness (鼻識, ghrāṇa-vijñāna). When these three converge, the sentient being generates perception and experience of odor.

Yet Buddhism attends to the nose-faculty because it is the "battlefield" of birth-and-death and liberation:

1. The Nature of the Nose: Impermanence, Suffering, Non-Self, and Arising-and-Ceasing

The 《杂阿含经》 (Saṃyuktāgama) points out that the nature of the nose-faculty is impermanence (無常, anitya) and suffering (苦, duḥkha) [5918, 5920]. Precisely because it is impermanent and subject to causes and conditions, sentient beings have no mastery over it whatsoever—hence the text's statement: 「不得于鼻欲令如是、不令如是」 [5920, 5922]—you cannot command your own nose to smell only fine fragrances and never foul stench.

The nose's "arising, abiding, and turning outward" (生、住、转出) is, at the deepest level of doctrine, bound up with the birth, aging, sickness, and death of sentient beings [5918]. The arising of the nose-faculty means the arising of suffering and the existence of aging, sickness, and death. Conversely, if one can cause the nose sense-base to "cease, subside, and vanish"—even reaching the state where 「鼻入处灭,则名色、诸识灭尽令无余」—only then does the suffering of birth, aging, sickness, and death come to a complete end [5918, 12381].

2. The Seduction of Odors and the Demon Net of Birth and Death

The scriptures employ three extremely profound similes to reveal how the nose-faculty binds sentient beings to birth and death:

* The simile of the great ocean and its waves: The scriptures liken sense organs such as the nose to a vast "great ocean," and the odor-object corresponding to the nose to the surging "waves" on the sea's surface [5576]. Only if a cultivator can withstand the impact of the waves of the odor-field can he cross the ocean of the nose and escape being devoured by venomous creatures and rākṣasī demonesses [5576]. * The simile of the māra hook: The scriptures put forward the "six māra hooks," among which 「鼻味著香,是则魔钩」 [5625]. When a sentient being develops "delighting in" (味著, savoring attachment) toward the fragrance smelled by the nose, it is like a fish that has swallowed the Māra King's iron hook: the throat is caught, and one falls into Māra's hands, no longer free [5625, 5627, 5650]. * The simile of cutting off the tāla-tree crown: Once the crown of a tāla tree (palm tree) is cut off, it can never sprout or grow again. The scriptures use this as a simile: if one can cut off desire-and-craving toward the nose-faculty, it is like 「截多罗树头」—thoroughly severing the root from which the fruit of suffering could arise in future lives [5916, 8013].

3. The Subtle Karmic Causes of Odor and "Pervading Birth and Death"

In the 《大方等大集经》 (Mahāvaipulya-mahāsaṃnipāta-sūtra), the exposition of the nose-faculty reveals an extremely subtle pattern of karmic retribution:

* Classification of fragrances and the five aggregates: The object-field faced by the nose is subdivided into three kinds: "fine fragrance" (好香), "neutral fragrance" (中香, plain odor), and "foul stench" (恶臭) [16514]. The text states that within all three of these spheres lurk the sentient being's five aggregates (五陰, pañcaskandha) and latent tendencies (習, vāsanā, habitual propensities)—this is called 「贯生死」 [16514]. * Arising, turning, then ceasing, and the 108 karmic causes: Odors are, at the sensory level, usually momentary—「生转便灭」 (arising and immediately vanishing). But what ordinary people most easily overlook is that within this momentarily vanishing process of "ceasing" there lurks 「百八业因」 (one hundred eight types of subtle karmic offense-patterns, i.e., the "one hundred eight courses of the nose's primal offense," 鼻本罪百八行) [16515, 16588]. If one does not guard against this (不止守, failing to maintain restraint), this subtle tendency toward craving and aversion will lead to 「后世当复生受不灭」—the karmic offenses of birth and death continuing without interruption [16515, 16588]. * Distinguishing the five sense-pleasures from clinging: Fragrances that are lovable, agreeable, and memorable belong to the world's "five sense-pleasures as attributes" (五欲功德, pañca-kāma-guṇa) [7733]. The text emphatically stresses: the external odor-field itself is not "desire"; rather, the "clinging" (貪著) that sentient beings generate toward the fragrance smelled by the nose is the real desire [7733].

4. The Gate of Practice: Keeping the Gate Immovable

Facing the operation of the nose-faculty, the scriptures set forth extremely clear rules of practice:

* Recognizing, knowing, cutting off, and becoming free from desire: If one cannot recognize, clearly know, cut off, and become free from desire toward the nose-faculty, one cannot transcend birth, aging, sickness, and death. If one can recognize, know, cut off, and become free from desire, liberating the mind, only then can one "properly exhaust suffering" [5519, 5521, 5523]. * Not generating joy or delight: If one generates joy and delight at the place where the nose smells fragrance (鼻香喜, delight in nose-fragrance), this is "generating joy toward suffering" and is very far from nirvāṇa. If one can remain un-delighted and unattached, one gradually approaches nirvāṇa [5527, 5896, 5956]. * Keeping the gate immovable: With respect to fine fragrance, neutral fragrance, and foul stench, if a cultivator can "hold the gate" and keep it from wavering (「关令不动则堕道,不关则堕罪」), one will incline toward the path of liberation. Conversely, if one lets it go as it will, one falls into karmic offense [16514].


A Walkthrough in Everyday Life

To keep the "nose" from degenerating into an abstract piece of Buddhist terminology, let us use an extremely representative everyday scene from modern life to reconstruct, in full, the process by which the nose-faculty "pervades birth and death" at the subtle level:

Scene: A Specialty Coffee Shop and Scent Marketing

You are walking down a commercial street. A specialty coffee shop has just finished roasting a batch of coffee beans, and the rich aroma of caramel and nuts wafts out onto the street.

* Step One: The inner sense base and the outer sense base make contact Your nose-faculty (the inner sense base) makes contact with the fragrance in the air (the outer sense base; here, belonging to the "fine fragrance" category). * Step Two: Olfactory consciousness and the arising of "feeling" With the convergence of the three, olfactory consciousness (鼻識) arises in an instant. You identify the odor and immediately experience an extremely pleasant "pleasant feeling" (鼻香喜, delight in nose-fragrance) [5956]. * Step Three: "Perception"'s grasping of marks and "volition"'s fabrication Your mind immediately grasps a mark and classifies it (perception aggregate): "This is premium Geisha coffee—it can bring me the enjoyment of a refined life." Immediately afterward, clinging (貪著) in your mental activity (volition aggregate) is triggered—this is precisely what the scriptures call the 「魔钩」 seizing your throat [5625]. You feel a strong impulse, and your feet unconsciously turn into the shop. * Step Four: The retention of subtle karmic causes (arising, turning, then ceasing, and the 108 karmic causes) That wisp of coffee fragrance actually lingers in the air for only a few seconds—this is 「生转便灭」 [16588]. But this is precisely where ordinary people most easily map it wrong—people tend to think: "I only smelled it once, and the odor has already dissipated—what possible effect could that have?" Yet from the Buddhist standpoint, in the very moment you generate "delight, praise, and attachment" toward that wisp of fragrance, the latent tendency (習, vāsanā) has already taken root [16514, 5896]. You have developed a dependency on a certain olfactory stimulus, and this leaves the subtle seed of the 百八业因 [16588]. In the future, whenever anxiety or emptiness arises, you will frantically seek out this odor to "heal" yourself.

Reverse Scene: Foul Stench in a Crowded Subway

On the subway during the evening rush hour, a pungent smell of sweat comes from beside you (恶臭, foul stench).

* The mapping process: The nose-faculty contacts the foul stench and gives rise to a "neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling" or a "painful feeling" (鼻香忧, distress at nose-fragrance) [5958]. * Where one falls: You immediately generate intense disgust and aversion ("How can this person be so unhygienic!"). * What Buddhism points out: Whether it is the craving generated toward "fine fragrance" or the aversion generated toward "foul stench," if you fail to 「关令不动」 and allow your mind to rise and fall with the odor, this is "failing to maintain restraint" (不止守)—and it is the beginning of 「堕罪」 and of sinking into the "one hundred eight courses of the nose's primal offense" [16514, 16515].

The true walkthrough of liberation: When fragrance or foul stench assails you again, the cultivator who guards the nose-faculty maintains clear awareness (recognizing, knowing) at the very instant olfactory consciousness arises: the odor is just an odor (the odor-field); it is impermanent, arising and ceasing. The mind is neither lured away by fine fragrance (not delighting in fragrance) nor provoked to anger by foul stench. Seeing clearly the nature of odors as "arising, turning, then ceasing" and guarding the mind's gate—this is 「关令不动则堕道」 [16514].


Why Contemporary People Need It

In contemporary society, we are living in an era of unprecedented "olfactory reshaping":

1. The scent economy and the upgrading of the "māra hook" From scented candles and niche perfumes to bespoke signature fragrances in luxury hotels and "scent marketing" in commercial real estate, contemporary business logic exploits the physiological properties of olfaction with precision. Neuroscience tells us that olfactory signals do not require the rational filtering of the thalamus; they can pass directly into the brain's limbic system (the amygdala and hippocampus, which govern emotion and memory). This allows odors to trigger emotion and purchasing desire at the fastest possible speed. From the Buddhist standpoint, this is precisely the most refined contemporary disguise of the "魔钩" [5625]. Modern people often believe they are "enjoying life" or "improving their quality of life," when in essence they have become slaves to olfactory stimulation, led around by the nose by subtle clinging.

2. Emotional anxiety and "odor-dependence" Contemporary people labor under enormous mental stress, and "aromatherapy," sleep fragrances, and the like are all the rage. People try to rely on specific odors to calm their nerves and relieve anxiety. Yet if one lacks insight into the nature of the nose-faculty, this kind of "healing" all too easily becomes a new attachment—unable to fall asleep without a certain fragrance, emotionally collapsing at a bad smell. People hand over the control of their inner peace to external odors.

3. Neuroscience comparison and the Buddhist insight * The neuroscience perspective: It reveals how odor molecules bind to olfactory receptors, generating bioelectrical signals that stimulate neural circuits in the brain and trigger the release of dopamine or serotonin. Neuroscience can explain "how odors affect emotion," but it reduces all of this to matter and chemical reactions. * What is distinctive about Buddhism: Buddhism does not deny the physiological responses that odors bring, but it strikes directly at the core of the problem—the construction of subject and object, and the continuity of karma. Buddhism points out that the external odor (the odor-field) is only an objective existence; what actually causes people to suffer or to be liberated is the mind's clinging (貪著, desire) and latent tendencies (習氣) toward the odor [7733, 16514]. Buddhism offers a set of awareness-training methods for "keeping the gate immovable," teaching you to sever the continuity of desire in the very instant the neurochemical reaction occurs [16514]. * The limitation of science: Neuroscience can invent ever more alluring fragrance compounds to stimulate dopamine, but it cannot teach people how to completely free themselves from dependence on stimulation, let alone resolve the subtle suffering and the round of birth and death brought by the "百八业因" [16588].


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: Does Buddhism consider "fragrance" itself to be evil or sinful?

Clarification: This is a typical misreading that "makes the object the culprit." The scriptures state clearly: lovable, agreeable fragrances belong to the world's "five sense-pleasures as attributes"; the external odor-field itself is "not desire" (非欲) [7733]. Fragrance is merely an objective material phenomenon (色法, rūpa-dharma / 香塵, odor-dust). The real "desire" and danger lie in the 「贪著」 and 「味著」 that sentient beings generate toward fragrance in their own minds [5625, 7733]. What practice must cut off is the inner craving-desire, not the elimination of external flower-scents or coffee aromas.

Misreading Two: Odors "arise, turn, then cease"—once smelled, they're gone. It can't possibly create much karma, can it?

Clarification: This is ignorance of the subtle pattern of karmic retribution. The 《大方等大集经》 (Mahāvaipulya-mahāsaṃnipāta-sūtra) especially emphasizes the relationship between 「生转便灭」 and 「百八业因」 [16588]. Although the odor vanishes in an instant, when you generate delight, praise, craving, and attachment upon smelling a fragrance—or generate disgust and aversion upon smelling a stench—your mind-consciousness has already been defiled, and a subtle seed of latent tendency (贯生死) has been planted [16514]. These seemingly insignificant reactions of like and dislike, accumulating, are precisely the "108 karmic causes" that drive the continuity of suffering in future lives [16588].

Misreading Three: Confusing the "nose-faculty" as a sense organ with the "five faculties" of the cultivation path.

Clarification: In Buddhist terminology, "faculty" (根, indriya) has different domains. * The "nose-faculty" as a sense organ, along with eye, ear, tongue, and body, is called the "five sense faculties" or "six sense bases"; it is a physiological/psychological faculty that receives worldly signals, and is an object to be guarded and transcended. * In the cultivation path, by contrast, the "five faculties" (五根) commonly mentioned refer to faith, vigor, mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom (信、精进、念、定、慧) [7511, 7515]. These are five core spiritual powers that give rise to wholesome dharmas and incline toward liberation. The two concepts are entirely different and must not be conflated merely because the Chinese translation happens to be identical [7511, 7515].

Misreading Four: Does "keeping the gate immovable" mean wearing a mask, holding one's breath, or forcibly suppressing the sense of smell?

Clarification: The "gate-keeping" of practice is by no means physiological self-harm or forced numbing. 「不得于鼻欲令如是、不令如是」 shows that physiological olfaction is conditioned by causes and conditions—you cannot forcibly shut it off [5920]. The real 「关令不动」 is the guarding of wisdom—when the nose-faculty smells fine fragrance or foul stench, the olfactory function operates as it truly is, but the mind does not waver [16514]. Not being lured away by fine fragrance (not falling into craving), not being provoked to anger by foul stench (not falling into aversion), and in the very present moment of the arising and ceasing of odors, recognizing, knowing, and becoming free from desire—this is the "keeping the gate immovable" that leads to liberation [5519, 16514].

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义 在佛教经典中,「鼻」(ghrāṇa)是六入处(或内六入处)与五根之一,指众生的嗅觉感官。鼻根通过与外在的香尘(香境)接触而产生鼻识,是众生参与世间认识、产生执著与造作罪业的重要媒介。其本质具有无常、苦、非我所能主宰的特征。在修行解脱的脉络中,鼻根既是魔网与欲贪束缚众生的通道,也是修行者通过守护、断欲、离欲以达到涅槃的关键枢纽。

二、主要阐述 1. 鼻的本质:无常、苦与生灭 根据经典论述,鼻的本质是无常与苦的。由于其无常与苦,众生对其无法主宰,即「不得于鼻欲令如是、不令如是」。鼻的「生、住、转出」与众生的生老病死紧密相连,鼻的生起即意味着苦的生起、病的维持与老死的出现;反之,若能使鼻「灭、息、没」,则生老病死之苦亦随之止息。在最终的解脱境界中,鼻入处与名色、诸识皆当「灭尽令无余」。

2. 鼻与魔网、欲贪及罪业的束缚 经典通过多种比喻与论述阐明了鼻根在生死流转中的束缚作用: - 大海与涛波之喻:将「鼻」等感官比喻为「大海」,而将鼻所对应的「香」境比喻为「涛波」。若修行者能堪忍香境的涛波,便能度过鼻的大海,免受恶虫与罗刹女鬼的侵害。 - 魔钩之喻:提出「六魔钩」的概念,其中「鼻味著香」即是魔钩。若修行者对鼻所闻之香产生味著、习近,就会被魔钩钩住咽喉,落入魔手,不得自在。 - 五欲功德:鼻识所接触的可爱、可意、可念、长养欲乐之香,属于「五欲功德」。外在的香境本身并非「欲」,众生对鼻闻香境所产生的「贪著」才是真正的欲。 - 贯生死与百八罪行:鼻根在与境界接触时,所关联的「好香」、「中香」与「恶臭」中,皆含有「五阴」与「习」(习气),这被称为「贯生死」。若修行者「不止守」(未能止息妄念、守护鼻根),就会产生「鼻本罪百八行」,即鼻根根本罪业的一百零八种行相。此外,鼻所闻之香虽然在感官上是「生转便灭」,但在「灭」的过程中却隐含着「百八」业因,导致「后世当复生受不灭」,使罪业相续。

3. 鼻的修行与解脱 对于鼻根的修行态度,直接决定了修行者能否解脱: - 识、知、断、离欲:若对鼻不能识、不知、不断、不离欲,则不堪任正尽苦;反之,若能对鼻进行识、知、断、离欲,且心得到解脱,则堪任正尽苦,超越生老病死。 - 不生喜乐:若于鼻生起喜乐,即是于苦生喜,无法解脱;若不生喜,则能解脱于苦。 - 关令不动:针对鼻根对好香、中香、恶臭的反应,修行者若能「关令不动」(把关并使其不动摇),则能「堕道」(趋向道法、解脱);反之,若不能把关,则会「堕罪」。 - 远近涅槃:当鼻闻到可爱、可意之香时,若产生欣悦、赞叹、系著、贪爱等,则去涅槃甚远;若能不欣悦、不系著,则渐近涅槃。 - 关断根本:修行者应当断除对鼻的欲贪。一旦断除鼻欲,就如同「截多罗树头」一般,彻底断绝了其在未来世生起的根本。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异 1. 「五阴」与「五蕴」:在《大方等大集经》中,描述鼻根与境界接触时,使用的是「五阴」这一术语,指代众生的生死五阴,而在其他经典中通常表述为「五蕴」。 2. 境界分类的详略:《大方等大集经》将鼻根所对应的香尘细分为「好香」、「中香」与「恶臭」三类;而《杂阿含经》则多以「香」或「可爱、可意、可念、长养欲乐之香」来统称鼻之对境。 3. 罪业与解脱的独特术语:《大方等大集经》使用了「关令不动」、「不止守」、「堕道」、「堕罪」以及「鼻本罪百八行」等独特术语;而《杂阿含经》则多使用「断欲贪」、「离欲」、「识、知、断」等阿含经典的常见解脱术语。 4. 「五根」的歧义:在《杂阿含经》中,虽有「五根」(信、精进、念、定、慧)的说法,但该「五根」属于修行法门,与作为感官的「鼻根」无关,需注意区分。

四、与相关概念的关系 1. 鼻与香、鼻识:鼻为内入处,香为外入处。鼻根与香尘接触,产生鼻识。如《杂阿含经》中「鼻味著香」即是魔钩;《大方等大集经》中鼻所贯的好香、中香、恶臭皆含有五阴与习。 2. 鼻与六入处、名色、识:鼻与眼、耳、舌、身、意并列为「六入处」或「内六入处」。在最终解脱中,鼻入处与名色、诸识皆当「灭尽令无余」。 3. 鼻与喜、忧(六喜行、六忧行):鼻闻香而生起喜或忧,并于该处行,称为「鼻香喜」与「鼻香忧」,属于「六喜行」与「六忧行」的范畴。

五、代表性原文引用 1. 《杂阿含经》:「不得于鼻欲令如是、不令如是」;「鼻入处灭,则名色、诸识灭尽令无余」。 2. 《杂阿含经》:「鼻味著香,是则魔钩」;「若于鼻生喜乐者,则于苦生喜乐」。 3. 《大方等大集经》:「鼻所贯好香、中香、恶臭,是三处中皆有五阴及习,是名贯生死。关令不动则堕道,不关则堕罪。」 4. 《大方等大集经》:「鼻多去嗅好香、中香及以恶臭,不止守者,则有鼻本罪百八行。」

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》中對「鼻」——作為能覺知香氣的鼻根——的論述,主要在六入處的架構下展開,將鼻與眼、耳、舌、身、意並列,視其為同一系列修行所對治的對象。

一、鼻與其他五根的平行結構

經中大量經文以「眼……耳、鼻、舌、身、意亦復如是」或類似句式呈現,將鼻置於與其他五根完全平行的地位。所論及的修行內涵包括:識知與斷離(chunk:5519、5521)、離欲與心解脫、生喜與不生喜、味著與魔繫(chunk:5625、5627)、習近與繫著、欣悅與貪愛的連鎖、斷欲與根本斷除(chunk:5916、8013)、生住轉出與滅息沒、無常、苦等,鼻在此皆與其他五根同樣承受或同樣被對治。

二、鼻與香的配對

鼻所對之境,經中明確標示為「香」。具體可見:大海喻中,「耳、鼻、舌、身、意是人大海,聲、香、味、觸、法為濤波」,鼻與香直接相對;「鼻味著香,是則魔鈎」,將鼻與香的味著並列為魔之鈎;六喜行中列「鼻香」,六憂行中亦列「鼻香」,明顯以「鼻香」作為鼻根所緣境的複合表述(chunk:5956、5958);五欲功德中以「耳、鼻、舌、身識觸,可愛、可意、可念,長養欲樂」概括鼻等所貪著之境。

三、香的修行意涵

偈頌中以「非根莖華香,能逆風而熏」開展對香的討論,比較世間栴檀、優鉢羅、末利等花香與持戒清淨之香,結論是「戒香最為上」,「唯有戒德香,流熏上昇天」。此段雖非專論鼻根,卻承接經中對「香」的重視,將覺香之鼻所緣的對象,從世間芬芳引向戒德之香。

四、術語形式

本經論鼻時,常用複合詞「鼻香」(如「鼻香……於彼香處行」),或以「鼻」與「香」分別對舉(如「鼻味著香」),未見以「鼻根」獨立成詞的用法,而以「入處」(六入處)作為其分類框架。

大方等大集經T0397 · 大集部

《大方等大集經》中對「鼻」之論述,置於菩薩觀察六根(眼、耳、鼻、口、身、意)罪行之脈絡中,並非單獨施設,而是與其餘五根並舉而說,呈現高度整齊、循環往復之結構。

一、鼻為覺知香氣之根。本經明言鼻之功能在於「聞」香與臭,並分為三類:好香、中香、惡臭。此處用「鼻本多所聞」「鼻所聞」之語,與同段中眼之「所見」、耳之「所聞」、口之「所得」、身之「所得」對應,以「聞」字統攝鼻根對氣味之感知。

二、鼻與「百八罪」之關聯——此為本經獨特之框架。經中提出「百八本罪」之概念:鼻每遇好香、中香、惡臭三境,「不止守故」便各起「鼻本罪百八行」,故鼻一根合計有三百六十四種罪行。所謂「不止守」,即心念攀緣不止、不守護根門,由此生罪。

三、生滅流轉之相。本經進一步討論罪之生滅:鼻每遇香境「生轉便滅」,然「滅中有百八後世當復生受不滅」。罪雖現生即滅,其餘勢仍於後世再起受報,究竟滅盡須賴菩薩主動「校計百八本罪滅不滅」。

四、好—中—惡三分之固定格式。鼻之三境與眼之三色、耳之三聲、口之三味、身之三觸一致,皆以「好」「中」「惡」三分並列,並各配以「本」字強調此乃該根本具之罪性,此為本經論諸根罪行之定式。

五、術語特色。本經以「鼻本」稱鼻根、以「多所聞」「所聞」描述鼻之作用,措辭口語而質樸;「不止守」「百八罪行」「百八本罪」「生轉便滅」「後世當復生受不滅」等用語為本經所特有,與他經常見之「鼻根」「香處」「阿黎耶識」等術語風格不同,宜留意其用詞之異。

瑜伽師地論T1579 · 瑜伽部

《瑜伽師地論》論「鼻」之要義,可自鼻根自性、鼻之分類與鼻之名義三方面歸納之。

一、鼻根自性 本論並非獨立討論「鼻」,而係於「鼻識自性」一段中帶出鼻根之界定。據其所明,鼻為「四大種所造鼻識所依淨色」,性質「無見有對」,即不可目睹而具有質礙。鼻作為鼻識之俱有依,與意(等無間依)及阿賴耶識(種子依)共為鼻識生起之所依。鼻識之所緣者為「香」,亦屬無見有對;香有多種差別:好香、惡香、平等香,以及鼻所嗅知之根、莖、華、葉、果、實之香等。論中復以「鼻所聞、鼻所取、鼻所嗅」等名稱表述其行相,標示香為鼻所行、鼻境界、鼻識所緣、意識所緣。

二、鼻之分類 本論對諸根施設多項分類,鼻與耳等並列而說。鼻可立三種:光淨、不光淨、被損;又可立四種:恒相續、不恒相續、有識、無識。此乃就鼻之形相、狀況與機能之差別而立品類。

三、鼻之名義與執著 論以功能釋名而立鼻之名義:「數由此故能嗅諸香,故名為鼻」——鼻因能數數嗅聞諸香而得其名。同段又云:愚夫長夜「瑩飾藏護,執為己有,計為我所我及我所」,並依此等諸根假立種種名想,稱之為有情、人、命者、生者、意生、儒童等。此顯示本論對諸根所持之染執觀察。

四、術語說明 本論以「鼻」直接指稱能嗅香之根(與一般所稱「鼻根」同義),以「淨色」指其細色之構成;「鼻識」即依鼻而起了別香之識;所緣之境稱「香」,屬無見有對。分類中「恒相續/不恒相續」就鼻根相續與否而立,與眼耳鼻舌身意諸根共用此一框架。本論所用之名相,如「俱有依」「等無間依」「種子依」「淨色」「無見有對」「光淨」「恒相續」等,乃該論立說之標準術語形式。

Related