Dharma · AI Companion

捨覺分

upekṣā-saṃbodhyaṅga

七觉分中平等不偏的一支AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In the modern context, "equanimity" (舍, upekṣā) is often misread as a cold severance, a helpless surrender, or a numbness that follows emotional injury. Yet on the Buddhist path of liberation, the equanimity factor of awakening (捨覺分, upekṣā-saṃbodhyaṅga; also called 舍覺支) has an extremely precise and extremely elevated definition.

I. The Position of the Equanimity Factor on the Path of Liberation

The equanimity factor is the final step of the "seven factors of awakening" (七覺支, sapta-saṃbodhyaṅga): mindfulness, dharma-investigation, energy, joy, tranquility, concentration, and equanimity. The cultivation of the path of liberation is not accomplished in a single leap; it follows a strict sequence: the practitioner begins with the "four establishments of mindfulness" (四念處, smṛtyupasthāna), and through unwavering attention (the mindfulness factor, 念覺分, smṛti-saṃbodhyaṅga) discriminates wholesome from unwholesome and sees the true nature of body and mind (the dharma-investigation factor, 擇法覺分, dharma-vicaya-saṃbodhyaṅga); with courageous cultivation (the energy factor, 精進覺分, vīrya-saṃbodhyaṅga) one experiences the dharma-joy of having departed from desire (the joy factor, 喜覺分, prīti-saṃbodhyaṅga); body and mind settle into tranquility and pliancy (the tranquility factor, 輕安覺分/猗覺分, praśrabdhi-saṃbodhyaṅga); and one then attains the one-pointed concentration of "unifying the mind" in absorption (the concentration factor, 定覺分, samādhi-saṃbodhyaṅga).

When concentration reaches its peak, the mind is no longer shaken by craving or remorse — it reaches the state of "the stilling of craving and sorrow" (貪憂滅息). At this point the mind no longer needs deliberate control or forceful maintenance; it naturally enters an exquisite state of impartiality, mental equanimity, and freedom from craving and sorrow — this is the equanimity factor. It is the summit and culmination of the cultivation of all seven factors, one of the "seven jewels of awakening" (七覺分寶) that appear in the world only when a Tathāgata (如來) arises, and it possesses the decisive power of directly "turning toward nirvāṇa" (轉趣涅槃).

II. A Multi-Layered Analysis of the Classical Definition

To accurately grasp the equanimity factor, one must clearly unpack its classical content and not gloss over it with vague translations:

1. "Relinquishing wholesome dharmas" and "relinquishing unwholesome dharmas": The *Saṃyuktāgama* (《雜阿含經》) explicitly states that the equanimity factor comprises two aspects — "relinquishing wholesome dharmas" and "relinquishing unwholesome dharmas". * Relinquishing unwholesome dharmas (捨不善法): thoroughly pacifying the mind's adhesion to unwholesome dharmas such as worldly craving, aversion, and anxiety — no longer stirred into motion by unwholesome states. * Relinquishing wholesome dharmas (捨善法): after the practitioner has reached a higher stage through wholesome dharmas (such as the joy of deep concentration or the fabrications of practice), one sets down even attachment to "wholesome dharmas," "meditative states," and "one's own merit." Even the subtle mind-moment of "wanting to maintain the meditative state" during practice is relinquished. This "double transcendence" is the true "wisdom" and "equal awakening" (智與等覺).

2. The "nutriment" and "non-nutriment" of the equanimity factor: The scriptures use "nutriment" (食, āhāra) as a metaphor for the nourishment that sustains the awakening factors. The nutriment of the equanimity factor is the "three realms" (三界) — namely, the realm of cutting off (斷界, prahāṇa-dhātu), the realm of desirelessness (無欲界, virāga-dhātu), and the realm of cessation (滅界, nirodha-dhātu). When the practitioner properly contemplates "the cutting off of afflictions (the realm of cutting off)," "the fading of desire (the realm of desirelessness)," and "the extinguishing of attachment (the realm of cessation)," the equanimity factor is continuously nourished and augmented. Conversely, if one fails to contemplate properly and loses attention to the principle of cessation, the equanimity factor withers (i.e., "non-nutriment").

3. The timing for countering "agitation" and "sluggishness" (the right time and the wrong time): The Buddha's guidance on employing the equanimity factor reflects extremely refined psychological insight: * Not the time (should not be cultivated): When the mind is "sluggish" (微劣), "drowsy," or "hesitant and indolent," one absolutely must not cultivate the equanimity factor (nor the tranquility factor or the concentration factor). Cultivating "equanimity" in such a depleted state is nothing but an excuse for laziness and drowsiness — it only "increases indolence" (增懈怠), driving the mind deeper into sluggishness. * The right time (should be cultivated): When the mind is "agitated" (掉動) — restless, excitable, thoughts racing — that is precisely the optimal time to cultivate the equanimity factor. The equanimity factor can pacify agitation and cause the mind to "settle inwardly, one-pointed and self-possessed" (內住一心攝持).

4. Distinctions and boundaries: the "equanimous feeling" (舍受) and the "pure equanimity" (清淨舍): In scriptures such as the *Madhyamāgama* (《中阿含經》), "equanimity" appears at different levels, and these must be strictly distinguished rather than conflated: * Equanimous feeling (舍受, upekṣā-vedanā; rendered "舍覺" in the old canon): a neutral set of bodily and mental experiences (neither painful nor pleasant feeling) triggered by "equanimous contact" (舍觸, upekṣā-sparśa; rendered "舍更樂" in the old canon). It arises dependent on contact and ceases when contact ceases; in essence it is an impermanent, conditioned phenomenon. * Pure equanimity (清淨舍) as the meditation of the formless realm: Having abandoned pain, pleasure, joy, and sorrow, with a supremely pure mind, the practitioner may move this equanimous mind into and bind it to the four formless absorptions (四無色定; such as the sphere of infinite space, 空無邊處, and the sphere of infinite consciousness, 識無邊處). The scripture uses the simile of a goldsmith freely fashioning ornaments from refined gold to illustrate the extreme purity and pliancy of this equanimous mind. * The key transcendence of the equanimity factor: The scriptures issue a special warning: even the "supremely pure" equanimous mind realized in the four formless absorptions, as long as it is established in dependence on meditative attainment, is still a conditioned phenomenon (有為法, saṃskṛta-dharma). And "what is conditioned is impermanent; what is impermanent is suffering" (若有為者,則是無常,若無常者,即是苦也). The true equanimity factor must "rely on renunciation, rely on desirelessness, rely on cessation, and turn toward relinquishment" (依遠離、依無欲、依滅、向於舍) — wisely seeing that even the most purified equanimous mind in absorption is conditioned and impermanent, and thus neither actualizing it nor entering it, ultimately reaching the unconditioned final cessation.


A Walkthrough in Everyday Life

To avoid treating the equanimity factor as an abstract scholastic term, let us turn to the everyday scenarios of contemporary people: how the mind moves step by step from agitation and turmoil toward "equanimity" — and where it most easily goes wrong in its mapping.

Scenario: Handling a project crisis late at night (or a violent quarrel in an intimate relationship)

* Step one: The mindfulness factor — noticing the alarm At 11 p.m., the work group chat suddenly explodes — a major vulnerability emerges in a critical project; or, in an intimate relationship, a thoughtless remark triggers an extremely heated verbal conflict between both parties. At this moment, heart rate spikes and the body tenses. The first step of practice is mindfulness — clearly noticing "anxiety has arisen," "anger has arisen," without being dragged along by the emotions.

* Step two: The dharma-investigation factor and the energy factor — discerning and counteracting You begin to rationally discern (dharma-investigation): which of these are facts that can be addressed now, and which are catastrophic consequences fabricated by the mind? Then you invest focused attention (energy) in handling the crisis, or proactively pause the harmful conversation.

* Step three: The joy factor, tranquility factor, and concentration factor — from settling to stability When the crisis has been initially contained, or both parties agree to cool down, bodily tension begins to subside (tranquility), and the mind feels a grounded sense of relief from the chaos (joy). Your attention is no longer scattered; it is focused on the present moment (concentration).

* Step four: The genuine emergence of the equanimity factor — "without further exertion, attaining equanimity" (不勤方便,而得平等) At this point, the real test arrives. After handling the matter, most people find their minds still circling: "Could there still be hidden problems?" "How dare he say that to me?" — this is "agitation" (掉動). If at this moment one can activate the equanimity factor, the mind enters a deep state of impartiality and release: * Relinquishing unwholesome dharmas: You clearly see through those rumination-style anxieties and resentments, refuse to give them energy, and let them arise and cease on their own. * Relinquishing wholesome dharmas (transcending control): Beyond that, you no longer desperately pursue the perfectionism of "I must immediately eliminate every hidden risk," nor do you try to "control" the other person's state of mind. You have done what needed to be done, and the mind rests completely — neither welcoming nor rejecting the outcome, perfectly impartial. This state — "having exerted diligent effort, one-pointedly receiving it rightly," and then "without further exertion, attaining equanimity" (精勤方便已,一心正受…不勤方便,而得平等) — is the equanimity factor's true reflection in daily life.

Where Most People Go Wrong in Their Mapping

1. Mistaking "going slack / switching off / indifference" (擺爛) for the equanimity factor: Faced with pressure, some people choose: "Forget it, whatever happens happens, I'm done caring" — this is by no means the equanimity factor. This state is essentially "feeble mental energy" (心力微劣) or "concealed aversion (avoidance)." The scriptures long ago warned: when the mind is sluggish, cultivating "equanimity" only "increases indolence". The equanimity factor is a calm, wise vision that arises after heightened awareness and the pacification of agitation — not the numbness of a despairing mind that has withdrawn from the world.

2. Mistaking "a neutral, bored feeling" for the equanimity factor: The "neither painful nor pleasant" feeling when scrolling through a phone until everything is dull and the mind goes blank is merely a physiological or psychological "equanimous feeling" (舍受). It is a transient feeling that arises from mechanical stimulation (contact, 觸/更樂) and vanishes when the stimulation disappears; it possesses none of the liberating power of awakening.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary life has been reshaped by intense "algorithmic stimulation" and a "control-freak culture." The spiritual predicament of modern people often lies not in a lack of motivation to pursue, but in not knowing how to close things out — how to let go of a world one cannot control.

1. Deconstructing the "agitated mind" of the algorithm age The contemporary mind is often in a state of extreme "agitation" — endlessly scrolling short videos, work notifications popping up at any moment, a life saturated with performance metrics and anxiety. The Buddha pointed out more than two thousand years ago: when the "agitated mind arises" (掉心起), what is needed is precisely "equanimity" to settle the mind inwardly in one-pointed self-possession. The equanimity factor provides a powerful mental anchoring mechanism; it teaches us, amid a chaotic flood of information, not to be swept away by any single wave.

2. Counteracting "trying too hard" and the "control-freak trap" Contemporary culture encourages us to control everything: health, wealth, parenting, relationships. Yet the nature of life is impermanence and uncertainty. When people try to control the uncontrollable, they fall into endless suffering. The wisdom of the equanimity factor lies in this: after doing one's utmost, turn toward relinquishment. It is not inaction; rather, after making all necessary effort (energy, concentration), one completely relinquishes attachment to the "outcome." This is what the venerable Śāriputra (舍利弗) displayed — "without further exertion, attaining equanimity". This is an extremely high-level psychological freedom.

3. A perspective on scientific and neuroscientific analogies Modern neuroscience often compares this state to the calm that follows suppression of the brain's "default mode network (DMN)," or to the stress-recovery state dominated by the parasympathetic nervous system; in AI reinforcement learning, there are likewise analogies such as the "exploration-exploitation balance" or the convergence of a loss function. These analogies help contemporary people understand the physiological mechanisms of "body-mind settling," but scientific analogies are by no means the Dharma itself. Neuroscience is concerned with the physical processes of neuronal signaling and hormone secretion; it cannot encompass the liberating orientation of "the realm of cutting off, the realm of desirelessness, the realm of cessation" (斷界、無欲界、滅界) embodied in the equanimity factor, still less can it explain the wisdom-transcendence of "relinquishing both wholesome and unwholesome dharmas" that reaches directly into the reality of non-self.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

To thoroughly clarify this concept, we need to dismantle one by one the mistaken views most commonly encountered:

| Misreading | True Classical Meaning | Key Distinction | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Misreading one: "Equanimity" means not caring about anything and giving up effort (going slack). | The equanimity factor must be preceded by "mindfulness, dharma-investigation, energy, joy, tranquility, and concentration". When the mind is feeble and indolent, cultivating equanimity is forbidden — otherwise it "increases indolence". | Going slack is drowsiness and indolence; the equanimity factor is clarity and impartiality after the pacification of agitation. | | Misreading two: "Equanimity" is a kind of neither-painful-nor-pleasant peaceful feeling. | A neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling is merely the "equanimous feeling" (舍受), arisen in dependence on the physiological and environmental "contact" (觸/更樂); it is an impermanent, conditioned feeling aggregate. | The equanimous feeling is a physiological/psychological experience; the equanimity factor is an awakening element whose very core is wisdom. | | Misreading three: Entering the extremely deep and purified "equanimity" state of absorption means complete liberation has been attained. | The *Madhyamāgama* (《中阿含經》) warns: even the "supremely pure" equanimity of the four formless absorptions is still a "conditioned phenomenon" (有為法). "What is conditioned is impermanent; what is impermanent is suffering". | The pure equanimity of absorption is conditioned and impermanent; the true equanimity factor must "see it as conditioned and impermanent, neither actualize it nor enter it," and thus turn toward true cessation. | | Misreading four: "Equanimity" merely means relinquishing bad emotions and unwholesome deeds. | The *Saṃyuktāgama* (《雜阿含經》) explicitly states that the equanimity factor comprises both "relinquishing wholesome dharmas" and "relinquishing unwholesome dharmas". | One must relinquish not only unwholesome dharmas, but also attachment to the merits of practice, to sublime meditative states, and even to the thought "I am practicing." |

Conclusion

The equanimity factor is not a starting point; it is the perfect culmination of a long course of mental training. It is like a ferryboat — before reaching the far shore, we need energy, dharma-investigation, and mindfulness; but once body and mind have crossed the violent waves and come to rest in stillness, even the boat itself — and even the thought of "wanting to arrive" — is set down.

In this stillness of "without further exertion, attaining equanimity," the mind is no longer tethered by any worldly craving or sorrow; it reflects all things as they are, and turns toward true liberation and freedom.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「舍觉分」(梵语:upekṣā-saṃbodhyaṅga),又称「舍觉支」,是佛教修行体系中「七觉支」(或称七觉分)的最后一个阶段。它代表修行者在禅定中达到的一种心行平等、远离贪忧、不偏不倚的觉悟状态。在《杂阿含经》中,舍觉分被视为如来出世时才现于世间的「七觉分宝」之一,包含「舍善法」与「舍不善法」两个侧面,两者皆是「智」、是「等觉」,具有「能转趣涅槃」的决定性作用。在《中阿含经》中,修习舍觉支亦被列为比丘不可毁犯的「七不衰法」之一,若能受持,则「比丘必胜,则法不衰」。

二、主要阐述

1. 渐次生起与修习顺序:舍觉分的成就并非孤立,而是遵循特定的修习顺序。修行者从修习身、受、心、法四念处开始,专心系念,渐次生起念、择法、精进、喜、猗、定等觉分。当「定觉分」满足、达到「一其心」且「贪忧灭息」的状态后,内心行舍,进而修习并逮得「舍觉分」清净满足。 2. 修习的时机(是时与非时):修习舍觉分需注意心境时机。当心力「微劣」或「微劣犹豫」时,不应修习猗、定、舍觉分,否则会「增懈怠」,使心更加微劣。相反,当「掉心起」或「掉心犹豫」时,则是修习舍觉分的合适时机,因为这些法能「令内住一心摄持」,平息掉动。此外,「正思惟」能使未生的舍觉支生起、已生者增广;「不正思惟」则会使其退失。 3. 舍觉分之「食」与「不食」:舍觉分的滋养(食)与退失(不食)取决于思惟的对象。其「食」为「三界」,即「断界、无欲界、灭界」;若对此三界进行思惟,则能使舍觉分生起并重生增广。若不予思惟,则舍觉分退失,此即「不食」。 4. 多法门结合与证得状态:舍觉分可与不净观、随死念、慈心、空入处等无色界定、安那般那念及无常想等二十种想结合修持。在具体修持方向上,必须「依远离、依无欲、依灭、向于舍」。证得此状态者,可达到「不勤方便,而得平等」或「精勤方便……一心正受」的乐住境界。如尊者舍利弗所述,他对舍觉分能「决定而得,不勤而得」,并能随欲正受,清晰了知其起、灭、没的过程。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同经典与译本中,对于「舍」这一概念的术语使用与教义侧重存在显著差异: 1. 译语风格的差异: - 《中阿含经》(东晋译本)展现了独特的译语风格。该经以「更乐」指代「触」(如「舍更乐」);以「觉」指代「受」(如将「舍受」译为「舍觉」,另有「乐觉」等五觉);以「息」指代七觉支中的「轻安」;以「出要」指代「出离/解脱」。 - 《杂阿含经》(刘宋译本)则使用较为常见的术语,主要以「舍觉分」与「舍觉支」交替出现。 2. 「舍」的教义范畴差异: - 《杂阿含经》中的「舍觉分」严格定位于七觉分修行体系,强调其作为「智」与「等觉」的解脱功能。 - 《中阿含经》对「舍」的论述更为广泛。除了作为七觉支之一的「修舍觉支」外,还探讨了作为受觉与识的「舍觉」与「舍识」,以及「清净舍」的修持与超越。

四、与相关概念关系

1. 与「触」(更乐)的因缘关系:在《中阿含经》中,作为受觉的「舍觉」依触而立。经中指出「因舍更乐故生舍觉」,它是「从更乐生,以更乐为首,依更乐行」;若灭除「舍更乐」,则依此生起的舍觉也会「灭息止」。 2. 与「四无色定」的关系:在《中阿含经》中,当比丘不染著于苦、乐、喜、忧而获得「清净舍」时,可将此舍心移入并系缚于无量空处、无量识处、无所有处、非有想非无想处等四无色定中修持,如金师炼金随意制作饰物。 3. 与「有为、无常、苦」的关系:虽然「清净舍」极其清净,但《中阿含经》强调,依于四无色处的清净舍「故是有为」,「若有为者,则是无常,若无常者,即是苦也」。比丘必须对此保持警惕,不成就、不移入,才能达到最终的寂灭。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《中阿含经》:「修舍觉支,依舍离、依无欲、依灭尽,趣向出要。」 2. 《中阿含经》:「因舍更乐故生舍觉……若比丘灭此舍更乐已,因此生舍觉亦灭息止,知已冷也。」 3. 《中阿含经》:「彼作是念:我此清净舍,极清净也……若有为者,则是无常,若无常者,即是苦也。」 4. 《杂阿含经》:「身猗息后心定,修定觉支满足。定觉支满足已,贪忧灭,则舍心生,修习舍觉支。」 5. 《杂阿含经》:「掉心起时,是修猗、定、舍觉分时。何以故?掉心起时,以此诸法,令内住一心摄持故。」 6. 《杂阿含经》:「何等为舍觉分食?有三界。何等为三?谓断界、无欲界、灭界。彼先未生舍觉分令生,已生舍觉分重生令增广,是名舍觉分食。」

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

本部《中阿含經》論及「捨覺分」之處,見於其「七不衰法」之教說中。首先須指出術語形式之異:經文原文用「捨覺支」而非「捨覺分」,正文所見為「修捨覺支」,可知此部經以「覺支」為稱,與今概念標題所用「覺分」之字不同,此即多譯名歸一須記錄之處。

就脈絡而言,「捨覺支」被列為七覺支之最後一支,前六支依次為念覺支、擇法、精進、喜、息、定,與七覺支之標準序列相合。經云:「若比丘修念覺支,依捨離、依無欲、依滅盡,趣向出要,擇法、精進、喜、息、定;修捨覺支,依捨離、依無欲、依滅盡,趣向出要者,比丘必勝,則法不衰。」 由是觀之,本部經對捨覺支之論述有以下數點。

第一,所依之三法:捨覺支之修習必須「依捨離、依無欲、依滅盡」。此三依——捨離、無欲、滅盡——為捨覺支修習之根本所依,亦即以出離、離欲、寂滅為其基礎。此一「三依」結構與同段中念覺支之修行形式完全一致,顯示七覺支共享同一修持原則,而捨覺支作為末支,尤與「捨離」之精神相契。

第二,趣向之目標:經文明言捨覺支之修習乃「趣向出要」。所謂「出要」,即趣向解脫之要、勝義之歸趣。此一表述顯示捨覺支並非僅是靜定之工夫,而是以解脫為其究竟指向。

第三,整體之果效:捨覺支之修習被納入「七不衰法」之架構中,經云受持此七不衰法而不犯者,「比丘必勝,則法不衰」。換言之,捨覺支之修持不僅關乎個人之修證,更與正法之住世相連,成為令正法不衰之因緣。

第四,與其他覺支之並列:經文將捨覺支與前六支並列同述,置於七覺支序列之末,呈現其為七覺支整體中平等不偏、最終歸結之一支的特色,與此概念題旨「七覺分中平等不偏之一支」正相呼應。

綜上,《中阿含經》此段論述捨覺支之獨特側面,在於將其置於「七不衰法」之正法住世框架下,以「依捨離、依無欲、依滅盡」為修習所依,以「趣向出要」為目標指向,並以「比丘必勝,法不衰」為究竟果效。此即本部經對捨覺支此一概念之核心表述。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論捨覺分,乃七覺分之最後一支。經中對此概念所用術語有二種形式:「捨覺分」與「捨覺支」並用,與整體「七覺分/七覺支」之交替一致。

一、漸次修習之位次

經多處明示七覺分依序漸起:修定覺分滿足已,「貪憂滅息,內心行捨,方便修習捨覺分」;又「定覺滿足已,貪憂滅,則捨心生,修捨覺支。修捨覺支已,捨覺支滿足」。可見捨覺分居於七分之末,由前分(定覺分)之力使貪憂止息、內心平等而後方得生起。

二、「平等」與「等覺」之語義——本經之獨特表述

本經論捨覺分之核心,在於明示「平等」之義。尊者優波摩答阿提目多問,說比丘修七覺分善知方便,若不如法,雖精進方便「不得平等」;若得善巧,「不勤方便,而得平等」——捨覺分亦同此說。「平等」即捨覺分平衡不偏之境。此外,經於七覺分說十四之文,於捨覺分處言:「有捨善法,有捨不善法。彼善法捨,即是捨覺分,是智是等覺,能轉趣涅槃」,以「等覺」明捨覺分覺照之性非偏於善、非偏於不善,恰與「平等不偏」相應。

三、修習之時機——「不偏」之具體體現

此經特別揭示捨覺分非任何時機皆修:掉心起、掉心猶豫時應修猗、定、捨三覺分,「此等諸法,能令內住一心攝持」;若心微劣猶豫則不應修此三覺分,「以此諸法增其微劣故」。反之,微劣時應修擇法、精進、喜。捨覺分之施與不施,全繫於行者之心態,正顯其「不偏」之性——專以對治掉舉,不應用於沉沒。經云「念覺分者,一切兼助」,餘五覺分各有所對,捨覺分與猗、定同屬一組而異於擇法等。

四、捨覺分之食(資糧)

經明捨覺分之食為三界:斷界、無欲界、滅界。思惟此三界,「未生捨覺分令起,已生捨覺分重生令增廣」。「斷、無欲、滅」三義,正與捨覺分平等離染之性相應。

五、通則與其他修法之共修

經反覆以「依遠離、依無欲、依滅、向於捨」明修習七覺分之通則。不淨觀、隨死念、慈心、空入處、安那般那念、無常想 等諸修,皆同此軌而修捨覺分。

六、餘義

舍利弗亦說七覺分「決定而得,不勤而得,隨意正受」,捨覺分亦在其列。經復以「覺支經」名此法,視七覺分為「法根、法眼、法依」「七道品法」。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》論及七覺分之修行時,列出七支之目,依序為念覺意、法覺意、精進覺意、喜覺意、猗覺意、定覺意、護覺意。其中第七支,相當於其他經中通稱之「捨覺支」,本經特以「護覺意」名之,可知本經以「護」字譯捨覺支之平等不偏之義,此為本經獨特之用詞,須特別留意。

就本經所述,捨覺分(七覺分之一)並非孤立地單獨說明,而是與其餘六覺分並舉,共同納入斷漏之修行體系之中。經文云:「修念覺意,依無欲、依無污、依滅盡而求出要,修法覺意、精進覺意、喜覺意、猗覺意、定覺意、護覺意,依無欲、依無污、依滅盡而求出要。」可知修行七覺分之共同原則,乃依於無欲、無污、滅盡三法而求出要;捨覺分亦不離此原則,與其他六覺分共依此三法而修。

本經對捨覺分之功用,以「斷有漏」之框架加以論述。經文明言:「若不修此者,則生有漏之患;設能修者,則不生有漏之患。是謂此漏思惟所斷。」故捨覺分之修與不修,直接關係到有漏之患之生與不生;其性質屬於「思惟所斷」之漏,亦即以如理思惟之力可斷除之煩惱。此乃本經對捨覺分作用之核心表述——以思惟之力斷除有漏之患。

此外,本經進一步將漏之斷除,細分為六類:見斷、恭敬斷、親近斷、遠離斷、威儀斷、思惟斷;其中「思惟斷」即指七覺分(含捨覺分在內)所對治之漏。而具足一切威儀、斷結去愛、度四流、漸越苦,正是圓滿修習七覺分(含捨覺分在內)之果效。此亦顯示本經將捨覺分置於整體修行脈絡中,而非作孤立之說明。

總結而言,《增壹阿含經》論捨覺分(以「護覺意」為名)有數項要點:一、以「護覺意」為捨覺分之譯名,此乃本經之獨特用詞,與其他經之「捨覺支」名稱有別;二、此覺分與其他六覺分同依無欲、無污、滅盡之原則修習,非獨立法門;三、其功用在於斷除「思惟所斷」之漏,修則不生有漏之患,不修則生有漏之患;四、與具足威儀、斷結去愛、度四流、漸越苦之究竟果效相連。

Related