Dharma · AI Companion

綺語

saṃbhinnapralāpa

无义而杂秽惑人的言语AI-generated

Type PhenomenaDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

An in-depth exploration of the Buddhist canonical concept of Sambhinnapralāpa (绮语 / 綺語 — commonly translated as *frivolous speech*, *idle chatter*, or *flattering, decorated talk*).


这个概念在说什么 (What This Concept Really Means)

In everyday parlance, people often mistake *Sambhinnapralāpa* (绮语) for harmless casual small talk, romantic prose, or polite social banter. However, in the classical Buddhist path of liberation (解脱道, *vimukti-mārga*), *sambhinnapralāpa* represents one of the Four Unwholesome Deeds of Speech (口四恶业, alongside lying/false speech, slandering/divisive speech, and harsh speech). It is far more insidious than an outright lie because it imperceptibly pollutes the mind, dissipates mental energy, and degrades trust.

To understand its full depth, we must examine its classical definitions across the early Agama scriptures (阿含经), where it is precisely broken down rather than treated as a vague moral admonition.

1. Classical Definitions & Structural Dimensions

In the *Madhyama Āgama* (*Mājjhima Nikāya* parallel, 中阿含经), *sambhinnapralāpa* is defined through eight negative traits: * 非时说 (*A-kāla-vādī* / Untimely speech): Speaking at an inappropriate moment. * 不真实说 (*A-bhūta-vādī* / Untruthful speech): Statements lacking factual grounding. * 无义说 (*A-nartha-saṁhitā-vādī* / Meaningless speech): Speech devoid of genuine benefit, spiritual utility, or purpose. * 非法说 (*A-dhamma-vādī* / Non-dhamma speech): Words that contradict or fail to align with the core principles of truth and reality (Dharma). * 不止息说 (*A-vinaya-vādī* / Speech that does not lead to cessation): Words that do not calm the mind, but instead stir up craving, aversion, or distraction. * 称叹不止息事 (Praising non-cessation): Glorifying pursuits, habits, or mental states that trap beings in samsaric agitation (e.g., romanticizing greed, vengeance, or mindless indulgence). * 违背于时而不善教,亦不善诃 (Untimely and failing to instruct or admonish skillfully): Speaking out of turn in ways that fail to offer constructive guidance or necessary, compassionate correction.

In the *Saṁyukta Āgama* (*Saṁyutta Nikāya* parallel, 杂阿含经), the term is rendered as 绮饰坏语 (*Qǐshì huàiyǔ*) or simply 坏语 (*Huàiyǔ* — "corrupted/destructive speech"). Its five defining characteristics are: * 不时言 (Untimely) * 不实言 (Unreal) * 无义言 (Meaningless) * 非法言 (Non-Dharma) * 不思言 (Unthoughtful / Unconsidered speech): Words uttered impulsively without reflection, awareness, or consideration of consequences.

Rather than translating *sambhinnapralāpa* merely as "gossip" or "ornate language," early Buddhism defines it as speech that is loose, untimely, decorated, unreflective, and contrary to the peace of mind. It is speech that scatters mindfulness and fuels defilements (*kleśas*).

2. The Positive Standard: The Path of Pure Speech

The Buddhadharma never stops at mere prohibition; it establishes an affirmative discipline. To abstain from frivolous speech (*离绮语 / 断绮语*) is to cultivate a specific, disciplined mode of communication.

The *Madhyama Āgama* outlines the positive criteria: * 时说 (*Kāla-vādī*): Speaking at the right time. * 真说 (*Bhūta-vādī*): Speaking what is true and real. * 法说 (*Dhamma-vādī*): Speaking in accord with reality/Dharma. * 义说 (*Attha-vādī*): Speaking what is beneficial and purposeful. * 止息说、乐止息说 (*Vinaya-vādī*): Speaking words that bring tranquility and inspiring delight in the cessation of mental turmoil. * 事顺时得宜,善教善诃: Ensuring that speech fits the context, offering clear instruction and timely admonition with skill and wisdom.

The *Saṁyukta Āgama* echoes this with: 諦說 (truthful), 時說 (timely), 實說 (factual), 義說 (beneficial), 法說 (accordant with Dharma), and 見說 (*Dhi-vādī* / grounded in right view).

3. Its Role in the Path of Liberation and Karmic Retribution

Why is idle chatter treated so severely in early Buddhism? * Impurity of Ascetic Practice (行苦行者秽): The *Madhyama Āgama* points out that even if a practitioner undergoes intense physical austerities, indulging in false, divisive, harsh, or frivolous speech makes their practice impure—a "stain on asceticism." External discipline means nothing if internal agitation spills out through uncontrolled speech. * The Loss of Credibility (言无信用): The *Saṁyukta Āgama* frames speech in terms of light/dark karma (*黑白业报*). Habitual indulgence in *sambhinnapralāpa* creates dark karma leading to lower realms; if born as a human, one’s words are naturally disbelieved and stripped of authority (*言无信用*). Conversely, practicing pure speech causes one’s words to be trusted, respected, and weighted with integrity (*言见信用*). * Cosmic and Social Impact: The scriptures even state that widespread indulgence in unwholesome speech causes the collective lifespan and physical vitality of human society to diminish, whereas collective restraint restores societal well-being and life quality.


生活里的走查 (A Walkthrough in Modern Life)

To see how *sambhinnapralāpa* works in practice, let us map the classical canonical criteria directly onto familiar modern scenarios.

``` [ Classical Criterion ] [ Modern Counterpart ] 1. 不思言 (Unthoughtful speech) ───> Impulsive social media comments / reflex posting 2. 非时说 (Untimely speech) ───> Venting work stress to a tired partner late at night 3. 无义说 (Meaningless speech) ───> Endless celebrity gossip & doomscrolling commentary 4. 不止息说 / 称叹不止息事 ───> Hype culture, flexing wealth, validating FOMO (Speech provoking turmoil) ```

Scenario 1: The Infinite Chatroom & Social Media Doomscrolling

* The Scene: You are in a group chat or scrolling through social feeds. A trending scandal breaks. Without verifying the facts, you quickly type: *"I knew this person was trash! Everyone like this deserves to burn!"* * Mapping the Canon: * 不思言 (Unthoughtful): The comment was typed in two seconds driven by a sudden surge of dopamine or outrage, without a second of silent reflection. * 不实言 / 非时说 (Unreal / Untimely): You do not know the full context or truth of the situation, yet you broadcast judgment into the public square at an arbitrary moment. * 无义言 (Meaningless): Adding another drop of indignation to the internet noise yields zero practical benefit (*无义*) to your life or anyone else's. * 称叹不止息事 (Praising non-cessation): By stoking collective anger, you actively amplify mental agitation rather than encouraging stillness (*止息*).

Scenario 2: Late-Night Venting in Intimate Relationships

* The Scene: It is 11:30 PM. Your partner is exhausted after a long workday and preparing for sleep. You suddenly remember an old frustration regarding how your in-laws treated you three months ago. You launch into a 40-minute rant: *"I just can't stop thinking about how unfair they were! Why didn't you stand up for me back then?"* * Mapping the Canon: * 非时说 (Untimely): Bringing up complex emotional grievances when the other person lacks the energy or bandwidth to process them effectively is a textbook example of "untimely speech." * 违背于时而不善教 (Untimely and unskillful): It does not resolve the past; it merely forces two tired minds into helpless exhaustion. * 误区澄清 (Common Mistake): Many modern people say, *"I'm just being authentic and communicating!"* But canonical Dharma distinguishes between *wise expression* and *sambhinnapralāpa*. Expressing grievances without regard to timing (*非时*), emotional capacity, or constructive purpose (*无义*) turns genuine communication into unwholesome vocal spillover.

Scenario 3: Corporate "Hype" and Flex Culture

* The Scene: At a team dinner or networking event, someone brags about working 80-hour weeks, making quick crypto profits, or buying luxury items to signal status. Others join in, glorifying the anxiety-driven rat race: *"If you're sleeping 8 hours, you're not grinding hard enough!"* * Mapping the Canon: * 称叹不止息事 (Praising non-cessation): Validating and romanticizing endless craving (*taṇhā*), hustle-culture burnouts, and superficial flexes directly instigates internal fever in oneself and others. * 非法说 (Non-Dharma): It reinforces the illusion that material possession and status bring ultimate security, obscuring the true nature of impermanence (*anicca*) and suffering (*dukkha*).


当代人为什么需要它 (Why Modern People Need This Principle Today)

We live in an age of hyper-amplified *sambhinnapralāpa*. Never in human history has communication been so cheap, frictionless, and ubiquitous.

1. The Economy of Attention and "Unthoughtful Speech" (不思言)

Modern algorithmic platforms (X, TikTok, Reddit, messaging apps) are engineered specifically to monetize 不思言 (unthoughtful speech). Algorithms reward immediate, emotional, unreflective reactions.

When early Buddhism highlighted "unthoughtful speech" (*不思言*) and "meaningless speech" (*无义言*), it identified a deep vulnerability in human cognition: the human mind naturally leaks energy when speaking without mindfulness. Modern neuroscience confirms that impulsive typing and endless micro-interactions keep our nervous system in a state of hyper-arousal (sympathetic overdrive), fragmenting our attention span and eroding our capacity for deep contemplation.

2. The Crisis of Trust (*言无信用*)

The *Saṁyukta Āgama* explicitly states that the karmic result of habitual *sambhinnapralāpa* in the human realm is that one's words lose credibility (言无信用).

Look at modern society: we are overwhelmed by hyperbole, clickbait, marketing fluff, corporate jargon, and political spin. When speech becomes excessively decorated (*绮饰*), overly dramatic, and detached from intention or timing, society suffers a catastrophic collapse of trust. The ancient Buddhist insight holds strikingly true today: When individuals lose restraint over their words, their collective authority and weight of character evaporate.

3. Speech as Mental Hygiene

In Buddhism, speech is not merely an external social tool; it is the **bridge between thought (*manas*) and physical action (*kāya*)**. Loose, frivolous talk continuously drains Samādhi (concentration) and destabilizes Prajñā (wisdom). Restraining *sambhinnapralāpa* is not about imposing puritanical silence; it is about preserving mental energy so the mind remains bright, calm, and capable of insight.


常见误读与澄清 (Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications)

误读一:“绮语就是指说脏话或造谣”

* Clarification: * Saying dirty words or insults falls under 粗言 / 恶口 (*harsh speech*). * Spreading false rumors deliberately falls under 妄言 (*falsehood / lying*). * **绮语 (*Sambhinnapralāpa*)** is distinct and far broader. A sentence can be grammatically polite, factually true in a superficial sense, and elegantly spoken, yet still be *sambhinnapralāpa* if it is untimely (*非时*), serves no meaningful purpose (*无义*), triggers unnecessary mental turmoil (*不止息*), or is blurted out without mindfulness (*不思*).

误读二:“佛教禁止绮语,意味着人不能有幽默感,不能开玩笑,生活必须死板沉闷”

* Clarification: Early Buddhist scriptures do not advocate for cold, stony silence or the elimination of warmth and joy. The key lies in mindfulness, timing, and intent (*事顺时得宜*, *时说*). * A warm, gentle joke that puts an anxious friend at ease, breaks awkward tension, or fosters wholesome harmony is 义说 (beneficial speech) and 时说 (timely speech). * Conversely, humor that mocks others, feeds cynicism, spreads salacious gossip, or is blurted out compulsively to cover up one's own inner anxiety falls squarely under *sambhinnapralāpa*. The difference is not whether speech brings a smile, but whether it springs from awareness and brings peace, or springs from delusion and causes agitation.

误读三:“只要我说的是真话,什么时候说、怎么说都不算绮语”

* Clarification: This is one of the most widespread errors among modern practitioners. The *Madhyama Āgama* emphasizes that speech must meet multiple simultaneous criteria: it must be true (*真说*), timely (*时说*), beneficial (*义说*), and accordant with Dharma (*法说*). * If you blurt out a brutal truth purely to vent your feelings, at a time when the listener cannot absorb it, without any constructive path forward, your speech fails the test of *时说* (timeliness) and *善教* (skillful instruction). Truth bludgeoned without wisdom and timing degrades into a subtle form of unwholesome speech.


总结:将言语还给清净与力量

In the framework of the Buddhist Noble Eightfold Path, Right Speech (正语, *Sammā-vācā*) is not a trivial set of etiquette rules—it is an indispensable pillar of spiritual liberation.

To abandon *sambhinnapralāpa* (绮语) is to reclaim mastery over one's own mind. Every time we catch an impulsive comment before typing it, every time we choose silence over empty gossip, and every time we pause to ensure our words are timely, true, beneficial, and calming (*时说、真说、义说、止息说*), we are actively clearing away the noise of samsara and cultivating a mind of immovable clarity and deep human dignity.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义 绮语(sambhinnapralāpa)是佛教经典中定义的口业不善之一,属于能招致苦果、令人受苦报的恶行。在《中阿含经》中,绮语被归为“口故作四业”之一。该经对绮语的具体表现给出了清晰的界定,即:“非时说,不真实说,无义说,非法说,不止息说,又复称叹不止息事,违背于时而不善教,亦不善诃”。这表明绮语不仅是不合时宜、不真实、无意义、不符合佛法的言论,还包括对不知止息之事的赞叹,以及违背时机、不能起到良好教导与呵责作用的言语。而在《杂阿含经》中,这一概念除了直接被称为“绮语”外,还被表述为“绮饰坏语”或“坏语”。该经将“坏语”的具体表现定义为:“不时言、不实言、无义言、非法言、不思言”,强调了其杂乱无章、不合时宜、不真实、无实际意义、不符合正法以及未经深思熟虑的特征。 ### 二、主要阐述 1. 远离绮语的修行标准与正面言语规范:与绮语相对的是“离绮语、断绮语”的修行。在《中阿含经》中,清净修行者(如难提波罗陶师或成就清净心的比丘)应当“离绮语,断绮语”以“于绮语净除其心”。断除绮语后的正面言语规范被统一表述为:“时说、真说、法说、义说、止息说、乐止息说,事顺时得宜(或作‘事随时得宜’),善教善诃”。这套术语系统地规定了佛教徒的说话原则。而在《杂阿含经》中,与“坏语”相对的是“离于坏语”的修行标准,修行者在言语上应当做到:“谛说、时说、实说、义说、法说、见说”,即言语应当是真实、合时、有义理、符合正法且具足正见的。 2. 绮语的业报与修行地位:在因果业报方面,两部经典都强调了绮语的严重危害。《杂阿含经》从黑白业报的角度指出,若人对“坏语”等恶行不作舍离,则属于“黑、黑报,不净、不净果”;具体而言,“若绮语人多习多行,生地狱中;若生人中,言无信用”。相反,“离于坏语”属于“白、白报,净有、净果”,若能对“不绮语”进行修习与多修习,则“得生天上;若生人中,言见信用”。在《中阿含经》中,绮语是导致人类社会寿命 and 形色衰退的恶行之一,当人们决定“离绮语、断绮语”并共行此善法时,人类的寿命便会转而增长,形色也会变得更好。此外,该经指出,即使有人在进行清苦的苦行,但如果造作“妄言、两舌、粗言、绮语”等恶戒,这种行为就被称为“行苦行者秽”,是修行中的污秽与杂染。 ### 三、不同部类与译本的表述差异 1. 核心术语的差异:在《中阿含经》中,该概念常与“妄言”、“两舌”、“粗言”并列,统一使用“绮语”一词,其对应的正面修持为“离绮语,断绮语”。而在《杂阿含经》中,除了直接使用“绮语”外,还使用了“绮饰坏语”和“坏语”等独特术语来表述这一概念。 2. 负面表现的定义差异:《中阿含经》将其定义为“非时说,不真实说,无义说,非法说,不止息说,又复称叹不止息事,违背于时而不善教,亦不善诃”;而《杂阿含经》则将其定义为“不时言、不实言、无义言、非法言、不思言”。 3. 正面规范的用词差异:《中阿含经》使用的正面规范为“时说、真说、法说、义说、止息说、乐止息说,事顺时得宜(或作‘事随时得宜’),善教善诃”,其中“止息说、乐止息说”等词汇构成了该经独特的术语表达;而《杂阿含经》则表述为“谛说、时说、实说、义说、法说、见说”。 ### 四、与相关概念的关系 1. 与口四恶业的关系:在两经中,“绮语”(或“坏语”)均与“妄言”(或“不实言”)、“两舌”、“粗言”(或“恶口”)并列,共同构成口业不善的代表。 2. 与苦行及戒律的关系:在《中阿含经》中,绮语被视为“行苦行者秽”,即使外在行持清苦,若口造绮语等恶戒,仍属杂染。 3. 与信用的关系:在《杂阿含经》中,绮语直接关联到言语的信用度,造绮语者“言无信用”,离绮语者“言见信用”。 ### 五、代表性原文引用 1. 《中阿含经》关于绮语定义的描述:“非时说,不真实说,无义说,非法说,不止息说,又复称叹不止息事,违背于时而不善教,亦不善诃”。 2. 《中阿含经》关于不绮语修行的描述:“离绮语,断绮语,时说、真说、法说、义说、止息说、乐止息说,事顺时得宜,善教善诃”。 3. 《杂阿含经》关于坏语定义的描述:“不时言、不实言、无义言、非法言、不思言”。 4. 《杂阿含经》关于绮语业报的描述:“若绮语人多习多行,生地狱中;若生人中,言无信用……离于坏语……得生天上;若生人中,言见信用”。

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》論綺語,置於「口故作四業」之框架中,與妄言、兩舌、麤言並列,屬十不善業之一,明言其「不善與苦果受於苦報」,且須「故作」(故意造作)方必受報,不故作則不必受報。

本經對綺語之正面界定,以五「非」與一「違」構成:「非時說,不真實說,無義說,非法說,不止息說,又復稱歎不止息事,違背於時而不善教,亦不善訶。」 此定義之獨特處在於:綺語之過失不僅在內容虛妄(不真實、無義、非法),更在「時」與「用」之失當——非時而說、違背於時,且既不能善教、亦不能善訶,即於教化功能上全然無益。又「稱歎不止息事」一句,顯示綺語包含對紛亂、散動之事的讚揚渲染,令人心不止息。

相對地,本經以六項正面表述界定離綺語後之正語:「時說、真說、法說、義說、止息說、樂止息說,事順時得宜,善教善訶。」 此六項與前述五非一一翻轉:非時說轉為時說,不真實說轉為真說,非法說轉為法說,無義說轉為義說,不止息說轉為止息說、樂止息說;末以「事順時得宜,善教善訶」收束,強調言語須契時宜、具教化與訶責之正用。此正語公式在本經中反覆出現於難提波羅陶師之持戒敘述(分別對阿難與大王二眾宣說)、比丘自述淨戒、及一般修行者離欲修梵行之段落,措辭高度一致,顯示為本經固定之術語格式。

本經另有一獨特敘事角度:於描述人世壽量遞增之過程中,眾生依次離殺、離不與取、離邪婬、離妄言、離兩舌、離麤言,而後方「離綺語、斷綺語」,綺語居口四業之末、十不善業之第七位方被斷除。 此敘事暗示綺語雖列於口業之末,然其斷除在修行次第上亦居較後,須先離粗重之妄言、兩舌、麤言,方能進斷綺語。

術語形式方面,本經一律用「綺語」,未見「雜穢語」「無義語」等異稱;口業總稱用「口故作四業」,強調「故作」之意志性;離斷之表述固定為「離綺語,斷綺語」,淨化之表述為「彼(我)於綺語淨除其心」,皆為本經之慣用句式。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論綺語,置於十惡業之序列中,與殺生、不與取、邪婬、妄語、兩舌、惡口並列,復接貪欲、瞋恚、邪見,合為身口意三業之十不善道。經文以「多習多行」一語統攝諸惡業之造作相,謂反覆串習、數數行之,非偶一為之。

就綺語之果報,本經所說極為簡要而對稱:「綺語多習多行,生地獄中;若生人中,言無信用。」 其結構為二重果報——重者墮地獄,輕者生人中猶受餘報。綺語在人間之特定餘報為「言無信用」,即所言不為他人所信受。此與妄語之「多被譏論」、兩舌之「親友乖離」、惡口之「常聞醜聲」各有所屬:四種口業之果報皆落在言語交際之不同面向,綺語獨當「信用」一面,謂其言雖出而人不予採信。

相對地,經文亦說離綺語之善果:「不綺語修習多修習,得生天上;若生人中,言見信用。」 此處用「修習多修習」以別於惡業之「多習多行」,語氣由放逸轉為對治。「言見信用」與「言無信用」恰成鏡像,「見」字表被動,謂其言為人所信。本經論綺語之核心旨趣,即在「信用」之得喪:綺語之害不在內容之虛妄(那是妄語),不在離間(那是兩舌),不在粗厲(那是惡口),而在令言者喪失整體之可信度。

本經所用術語即「綺語」,與後世論書及他經所見一致,未見異稱。經文不另立綺語之定義或細相,僅以果報顯其過患,此為《雜阿含經》說業報之通例:不繁釋名相,逕以「多習多行→地獄→人中餘報」之三段式呈現。

另有一偈以譬喻說姦狡之人與言說信用之關係:「蠅脚污素帛,明者小過現,如墨點珂貝,雖小悉皆現。」 謂皎潔之物上纖毫之污即昭然可見,喻有德者之小過為人察覺;而「袈裟污不現,黑衣墨不污」,喻兇惡姦狡之人積惡已深,不復為人所覺。其結語「姦狡兇惡人,世間不與語」,與綺語果報「言無信用」相通——皆指向言說者喪失交際資格,世人不復與其言語往還。此偈雖未逕用「綺語」之名,然其所論「世間不與語」之社會性果報,正為「言無信用」之具體寫照。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》論綺語,始終將之置於「口四過」(又稱「口四行」)的整體框架中,與妄語(妄言)、惡口、鬪亂彼此(鬪亂是非)並列,視為口業四種過惡之一,而非孤立地單論綺語一法。經中用語作「綺語」,與「妄言」「惡口」「鬪亂彼此」合稱,此即本經對口業過惡的固定術語組合。

其一,綺語與妄語同攝惡趣之因。佛告諸比丘,眾中不見一法修行已、多修行已,能成地獄行、餓鬼行、畜生行,若生人中則口氣臭惡、為人所憎,如妄語者;緊接著明言:「若有人妄言、綺語、鬪亂是非,便墮畜生、餓鬼中。所以者何?以其妄語故也。」 此處綺語與妄言、鬪亂是非三者並舉,共以「妄語」為總因而招感畜生、餓鬼之報。值得注意的是,本經將綺語的果報歸結於「妄語」這一總名之下,意謂綺語在性質上攝屬妄語之流類,同為不實不誠之語業。

其二,綺語為愚者之相。經說愚人有「三相三法」:不可思惟而思惟、不可論說而論說、不可行者而修習。其中「不可論說而論說」一項,即謂「愚者造口四過」,具體展開為:「愚者恒喜妄言、綺語、惡口、鬪亂彼此。」 此處以「恒喜」二字刻畫愚者於綺語等口過的態度——非偶爾失言,而是恆常樂著、習以為性。綺語在此被界定為愚癡之人「不可論說而論說」的表現,屬於愚者三相中口業一環。

其三,智者護口,遠離綺語且兼護他人。經於愚者三相之後,翻出智者三事:應思惟者思惟之、應論說者論說之、應行善者修行善。智者「成就口四行」的具體內容為:「不行綺語、惡口、鬪亂彼此,亦不教人使行綺語、惡口、鬪亂。」 此處本經對智者的要求不止於自身不行綺語,更延伸至「不教人使行」,即不教導、不唆使他人造作綺語等口過。連同前文論妄語時所說「不行妄語,亦不教人妄語,見人妄語者意不喜樂」,可知本經論護口的完整標準有三層:自不行、不教人行、見人行而心不喜樂。綺語雖未逐字重複「見人綺語意不喜樂」,但依經文「亦不教人使行綺語、惡口、鬪亂」的句式,綺語與惡口、鬪亂同攝於智者所護之口業,標準一致。

其四,本經論綺語的語境特色。兩處經文皆以「口四過」或「口四行」為綺語的所屬範疇,不另立綺語的獨立定義或細分別相,而是透過愚者與智者的對比結構,將綺語定位為「不可論說而論說」的愚行、智者所當護的口業。果報方面,本經明言綺語與妄言、鬪亂是非共招畜生、餓鬼之報,未別說綺語獨有之異熟,而是以「妄語」為總攝。術語上,本經用「綺語」一名,與「妄言」(妄語)、「惡口」、「鬪亂彼此」(又作「鬪亂是非」)並稱,未見以他名替代綺語之例。

Related