Dharma · AI Companion

邪語

mithyā-vāc

不合正法且能损害众生之语。AI-generated

Type PhenomenaDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What Is Wrong Speech (Mithyā-vāc)?

If we look at human civilization today, language is no longer just a tool for sharing information; it is the primary interface through which we construct reality. Every day, thousands of words pass through our keyboards, microphones, and vocal cords. Yet, how much of this endless stream of speech actually leads to peace, clarity, or freedom?

In early Buddhist thought, Wrong Speech (*mithyā-vāc* / 邪語) is far more than a simple infraction against social etiquette or moral politeness. It is identified as one of the "Eight Wrongfold Paths" (*Aṣṭāṅga-mithyā-mārga* / 八邪支) and one of the "Ten Evil Wrong Natures" (*十種惡邪性*). It constitutes a core engine of samsara—a destructive habitual pattern that binds the mind to suffering and obstructs liberation.


What Wrong Speech Really Is: The Fourfold Structure and Its Roots

In the classical scriptures—such as the *Saṃyukta Āgama* (*雜阿含經*) and the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*大寶積經*)—Wrong Speech is defined functionally: it is any expression that yields "unbeneficial suffering" (*非義不饒益苦*). Rather than being a vague, blanket term, Wrong Speech is mapped into four distinct behavioral categories (*語業惡行*), driven by specific inner and outer causes.

1. The Fourfold Classification of Wrong Speech

1. **Lying / False Speech (*Mṛṣā-vāda* / 妄語)** * Classical Definition: Speaking contrary to truth; deceiving oneself and others. The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* singles out lying as the "root of all evils" (*諸惡本*), as it breaks the foundation of pure moral discipline (*清淨戒*) and fundamentally distorts the mind's capacity to recognize reality. * Scope & Boundaries: Lying is not merely telling a bold-faced untruth; it includes misrepresenting facts, pretending to possess unearned virtues or spiritual attainments, and actively misleading others for personal gain or self-protection.

2. **Slanderous / Divisive Speech (*Paiśunya-vāc* / 兩舌 or 離間語)** * Classical Definition: "Carrying tales from here to there, and from there to here, bringing about mutual destruction" (*傳此向彼,傳彼向此,共相破壞*). * Scope & Boundaries: It is speech motivated by malice, envy, or tribalism that splits unified groups, destroys friendships, and pits people against one another. Its essence is the intentional sabotage of harmony.

3. **Harsh / Abusive Speech (*Pāruṣya-vāc* / 惡口 or 麁言)** * Classical Definition: Words that are coarse, sharp, aggressive, "disliked by the majority, unpleasing, disagreeable, and unsupportive of meditative composure (*不順三昧*)." * Scope & Boundaries: This goes beyond profanity. It refers to speech driven by anger, contempt, or malicious intent—words meant to wound, demean, humiliate, or provoke emotional distress.

4. **Idle / Frivolous Talk (*Sambhina-pralāpa* / 綺語, 壞語, or 世話)** * Classical Definition: Speech that is untimely, untrue, meaningless, contrary to the Dhamma, and unconsidered (*不時言、不實言、无義言、非法言、不思言*). The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* uses the distinct term *shìhuà* (*世話*, mundane/idle chatter) to denote non-beneficial, frivolous discourse. * Scope & Boundaries: Idle talk is often mistaken for innocent banter. However, in the Buddhist framework, it specifically refers to mindless chatter, gossip, sensory-seeking banter, and political or social argument that agitates the mind, squanders precious mental energy, and reinforces underlying defilements (*kleśas*).

2. The Internal and External Arising of Wrong Speech

Wrong Speech does not occur in a vacuum. Classical texts outline its precise causal conditions: * **The Internal Cause (*Unwise Attention* / 不正思惟):** When the mind engages in unskillful reflection—rooted in greed, aversion, or ignorance—unexpressed Wrong Speech is triggered, and already existing habits of evil speech grow and proliferate. Conversely, Wise Attention (*正思惟*) starves Wrong Speech of its momentum. * **The External Cause (*Evil Companionship* / 惡知識、惡隨從):** Surrounding oneself with bad influences, malicious peers, or toxic media environments fosters Wrong Speech. In contrast, associating with noble friends (*Kalyāṇa-mitta* / 善知識) causes unarisen Wrong Speech to stay dormant and existing patterns to fade away.

3. Classical Metaphors: The Axe in the Mouth and the Sugarcane

To emphasize the severe karmic consequences (*惡報*) and the subtler traps of Wrong Speech, the sutras offer two classical metaphors:

* **The Axe in the Mouth (*口中生斧*):** > *"When a person is born into the world, an axe is born inside their mouth. With it, they cut themselves down—all because of their own evil speech."* This vivid imagery from the *Saṃyukta Āgama* highlights that verbal violence is ultimately an act of self-destruction. The karmic fallout—mental agitation, bad reputation, lost trust, and lower-realm rebirths—falls heaviest on the speaker.

* **The Sugarcane Metaphor (*甘蔗之喻*):** > *"Mundane idle talk (*世話*) is like the skin and joints of a sugarcane; true spiritual meaning (*實義*) is like its sweet flavor. The skin and joints hold the juice, but they themselves have no fine taste. Thus, the wise Bodhisattva abandons hollow words and reflects on true meaning."* This allegory from the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* illustrates that while social language and everyday communication may serve as a preliminary wrapper, getting addicted to the chatter itself is like chewing on tough sugarcane husk while missing the sweet juice of liberation.


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life

To understand how Wrong Speech operates today, we must look past ancient terminology and track its manifestation across our daily routines—from work channels to personal relationships and algorithmic feeds.

``` [ Unwise Attention / Toxic Influence ] │ ▼ ┌─────────────────┐ │ WRONG SPEECH │ └────────┬────────┘ │ ┌───────────────┼───────────────┬───────────────┐ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ [ False Speech ] [ Divisive ] [ Harsh ] [ Idle Talk ] (Fake news, (Tribalism, (Cyberbull- (Doomscrolling, exaggeration) slack gossip) ying, rage) endless hot takes) ```

Scenario 1: The Office Slack Channel (Divisive & Harsh Speech)

* The Scene: A project deadline is missed. In a private group chat, a team member writes, *"Did you see how incompetent Sam was in the client meeting? He completely blew it again. I bet he’s trying to throw our team under the bus."* * Classical Mapping: * This is **Divisive Speech (*離間語*) and Harsh Speech (*麁言*)**. It builds tribalism within the workplace, ruins professional camaraderie, and stems directly from an aggressive, self-protective mindset. * Common Mismapping: People often excuse this as "venting" or "team bonding." In the Buddhist framework, venting that deliberately undermines another's character to solidify one's own standing is a direct manifestation of divisive speech.

Scenario 2: Social Media Feeds and "Hot Takes" (Idle Talk & False Speech)

* The Scene: An algorithmic platform pushes a sensational, unverified piece of celebrity or political drama. Without checking the source, a user reshares it with an inflammatory commentary to gain likes and retweets. * Classical Mapping: * This combines **False Speech (*妄語*) (spreading unverified claims) and Idle Talk (*綺語/世話*)** (frivolous, unconsidered speech designed to trigger outrage). * The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* warns that indulging in idle chatter leads to loss of mindfulness (*失念*), lack of inner tranquility (*身心不寂靜*), and diminished wisdom (*智慧退失*). * Common Mismapping: People often think, *"I’m just staying informed and participating in the public discourse."* However, if the speech is unconsidered, unseasonable, and driven by the desire for social validation, it falls squarely under *Sambhina-pralāpa* (idle talk).

Scenario 3: Casual Exaggeration in Daily Conversation (Lying)

* The Scene: Telling a partner or friend, *"I’ve been working 18 hours straight every day this week, I’m literally dying,"* when in reality, one spent half the day browsing e-commerce sites. * Classical Mapping: * While seemingly harmless, systematic exaggeration to manufacture sympathy or project an image of martyrdom is a subtle form of **False Speech (*妄語*)**. * Common Mismapping: Society labels this "harmless hyperbole." Yet, habitually warping the truth habituates the mind to subtle deception, eroding the foundation of **Right Speech (*Samyak-vāc* / 正語)**, which demands precision and truthfulness (*審谛實說*).


Why Contemporary People Need This Insight

Modern technology has exponentially amplified human vocal capacity. In the past, an angry outburst reached a few people in a room; today, a single tweet or short-form video can broadcast verbal harm to millions instantly.

1. The Trap of the "Attention Economy": Modern digital platforms are explicitly engineered to monetize Wrong Speech. Outrage (Harsh Speech), gossip (Divisive Speech), clickbait (False Speech), and doomscrolling (Idle Talk) generate high engagement. Recognizing Wrong Speech gives us a mental shield against algorithmic manipulation. 2. Cognitive Load and Mental Pollution: Neuroscientific and psychological research shows that constant exposure to hostility, sensationalism, and fragmented information raises cortisol levels, degrades attention spans, and fosters chronic anxiety. This mirrors the Buddhist insight that *shìhuà* (idle chatter) leads to "restlessness of body and mind" (*身心不寂靜*). 3. The Illusory Liberation of "Venting": Modern culture often encourages expressing every raw emotion under the guise of authenticity. While emotional awareness is crucial, unbridled verbal aggression does not release anger—it reinforces neural pathways of hostility. The Buddha’s insight that "an axe grows in the mouth" points to the fact that expressing malice deepens the internal habit of suffering.

*Note on Modern Parallels:* While concepts from cognitive science or media ecology help illustrate the mechanics of speech habits today, they focus primarily on stress reduction and mental performance. The Buddhist critique of Wrong Speech goes far deeper: it targets the root of self-clinging (*ātma-grāha*) and cuts off the karmic momentum that drives samsaric rebirth.


Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications

Misunderstanding 1: "Wrong Speech just means using bad words or curse words."

* Clarification: Profanity is only a small sub-category of Harsh Speech. Speech can be grammatically polite, soft-spoken, and free of profanity, yet still constitute severe Wrong Speech—such as passive-aggressive manipulation, cold divisive gossip, or polished, institutional lies. The morality of speech is determined by its underlying intent (*cetanā*) and its fruit (*義饒益* vs *非義不饒益苦*).

Misunderstanding 2: "Idle Talk (绮語) means I can never make jokes, have fun, or engage in small talk."

* Clarification: The goal is not forced silence or cold austerity. Early texts emphasize that Right Speech includes words that are "pleasing to the ear, affectionate, entering the heart, and welcomed by many" (*多人樂其所說*). Friendly, lighthearted communication that eases tensions and fosters genuine connection is not *綺語*. Idle talk specifically refers to speech that is mindless, unseasonable, aimless, and driven by defilements that scatter the mind.

Misunderstanding 3: "As long as what I say is true, it cannot be Wrong Speech."

* Clarification: Truth is necessary for Right Speech, but it is not sufficient. In the *Abhaya Sūtra*, the Buddha outlines that even if a statement is true and factual, if it is unbeneficial (*無義*), harsh, unpleasing to others, and spoken at an inappropriate time (*不時*), the Buddha will not speak it. Truth wielded like a weapon to destroy others is still a form of bad verbal action.


Summary: The Path to Right Speech

In the complete architecture of Buddhist liberation, speech acts as a direct bridge between internal intention (*思惟*) and external action (*業*). To transform Wrong Speech into Right Speech (*Samyak-vāc*), the classical texts prescribe a clear practice:

* Replace Falsehood with Truth: Speak with precision and honesty (*審諦實說*). * Replace Division with Harmony: Reconcile those who are divided and rejoice in unity (*離者令和,和者隨喜*). * Replace Harshness with Kindness: Use gentle, soothing language that enters the heart (*柔和愛語*). * Replace Idle Chatter with Meaningful Practice: Speak at the right time, grounded in truth, Dhamma, and liberation (*時說、實說、義說、法說*).

By stepping back from the chaotic noise of everyday language, we begin to see our words for what they are—not mere sounds in the air, but seeds of karma that shape our mind and our world.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义 邪语(mithyā-vāc)是佛教修行中与\"正语\"相对立的概念,属于八邪支之一,也是\"邪道\"的重要组成部分。在经典中,邪语被定义为能带来\"非义不饶益苦\"的恶劣言语。它不仅是众生堕入恶趣的根源之一,在《大寶積經》中更被列为\"十种恶邪性\"之一,属于\"邪性决定聚\",是愚夫之所依。

二、主要阐述 1. 邪语的产生与消灭因缘: - 内在因缘:以\"不正思惟\"为源头,不正思惟能令未起的邪语升起,已起者重生增广;而\"正思惟\"则能令未生的邪语不生,已生的邪语消灭。 - 外在因缘:受到\"恶知识、恶伴党、恶随从\"的影响,会使未生的邪语产生、已生的邪语增广;反之,若亲近\"善知识、善伴党、善随从\",则能使未生的邪语不生,已生的邪语消灭。 2. 邪语的具体表现与分类: 邪语主要表现为四种语业恶行:妄语、两舌(离间语)、恶口(麁言)与绮语(坏语或世話)。 - 恶口(麁言):表现为\"不离恶口骂\"、\"刚强\"、\"多人所恶,不爱、不适意、不顺三昧说\",其言语粗涩,被称为\"恶心\"。 - 两舌(离间语):表现为\"传此向彼,传彼向此,共相破坏\"。 - 妄语:与真实之言相对,被视为\"诸恶本\",能毁坏清净戒,欺狂自身及天龙、摩睺罗等众生。经中提到妄语有其特定的恶劣去向(所趣)。 - 绮语(坏语/世話):表现为\"不时言、不实言、无义言、非法言、不思言\",或指世俗无益的言论。 3. 邪语的严重过患与恶报: - 自残与不顺:经中以\"士夫生世间,斧在口中生,还自斩其身,斯由其恶言\"来比喻恶言对自身的伤害。 - 颠倒毁誉:邪语者\"应毁者称誉,应誉而反毁\",导致\"恶口增其过,所生无安乐\"。 - 谤圣重罪:特别是\"毁佛及声闻\"或\"谤圣\",被视为极大的罪过,其口意恶愿会导致死后堕入尼罗浮、阿浮陀等百千地狱之中。 - 堕落恶趣:四种语业恶行能牵引众生快速堕入地狱及恶道之中。妄语者现世\"口气常臭\",来世\"入苦恶道\"、\"死入三途\"。 - 世話(绮语)的过失:耽著于世話的人会产生诸多过失,如憍傲于多闻、执着诤论、失念不正知、身心不寂静、退失法忍与辩才、不尊敬师长、爱乐世论、常行邪道、智慧退失、常与烦恼俱等,并会受到圣者呵责、龙神不敬,最终命终生忧苦。 4. 远离邪语的清净修行: 与邪语相对,修行者应当通过\"正语\"来实现清净。具体而言,应当:离妄语(做到\"审谛实说\");离两舌(不挑拨离间,而是\"离者令和,和者随喜\");离恶口(言语不刚强,做到\"多人乐其所说\");离坏语(做到\"谛说、时说、实说、义说、法说、见说\")。菩萨应舍弃虚言(世話),思惟实义,欣乐法味、义味与解脱味,弃舍无利的言话。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异 1. 绮语的异称:在《雜阿含經》(阿含部)中,通常所说的\"绮语\"被特别称为\"坏语\"或\"绮饰坏语\";而在《大寶積經》(寶積部)中,则使用\"世話\"这一独特术语来指代世俗无益的言语或绮语。 2. 恶口的异称:在《雜阿含經》中称为\"恶口\";而在《大寶積經》中则被称为\"麁言\"。 3. 两舌的异称:在《雜阿含經》中称为\"两舌\";而在《大寶積經》中则被称为\"离间语\"。

四、与相关概念的关系 1. 与\"正语\"的关系:邪语是正语的对立面。修行正语能带来\"义饶益,常得安乐\",而邪语则带来\"非义不饶益苦\"。 2. 与\"八邪支\"及\"十恶邪性\"的关系:在《雜阿含經》中,邪语与邪见、邪志等并列,属于八邪支和邪道;在《大寶積經》中,邪语与邪见、邪思惟、邪业、邪命、邪精进、邪念、邪定、邪解脱、邪解脱智见并列,构成\"十种恶邪性\",共同建立\"邪定\"与\"邪性决定聚\"。 3. 与\"不正思惟\"与\"恶知识\"的关系:不正思惟是邪语产生的内在源头;恶知识、恶伴党、恶随从则是邪语产生与增广的外在因缘。 4. 与\"实义\"的关系(甘蔗之喻):《大寶積經》以甘蔗为喻,说明\"世話\"(邪语之一)与\"实义\"的关系。甘蔗的美味不离皮与节,但皮节本身无胜味;\"世話\"就如同甘蔗的\"皮节\",而\"义理\"则如同甘蔗的\"胜味\"。修行者应舍皮节(世話)而取胜味(实义)。

五、代表性原文引用 1. 《雜阿含經》:\"不离邪语,得非义不饶益苦……离邪语,得义饶益,常得安乐。\" 2. 《雜阿含經》:\"邪道者,谓妄语、两舌、恶口、绮语。\" 3. 《雜阿含經》:\"士夫生世间,斧在口中生,还自斩其身,斯由其恶言。\" 4. 《大寶積經》:\"一切眾生皆依邪見、邪思惟、邪語、邪業、邪命、邪精進、邪念、邪定、邪解脫、邪解脫智見,建立邪定,是名邪性決定聚,愚夫之所依。\" 5. 《大寶積經》:\"妄語是諸惡本,能毀壞清淨戒……現世口氣常臭,來世入苦惡道。\" 6. 《大寶積經》:\"世話如皮節,義理如勝味。是故有智菩薩,應當捨虛言,思惟實義。\"

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》對於「邪語」的論述,主要將其定位為八項邪道之一,與「邪見、邪志、邪業、邪命、邪方便、邪念、邪定」並列,作為八正道(正見、正志、正語、正業、正命、正方便、正念、正定)的反面,強調應當遠離、修斷,並修習其正向對治。此經所用術語為「邪語」二字,未對邪語的語言內容作具體分類(如妄語、綺語、兩舌、惡口等),而是採取列舉式的簡略說明。

一、邪語作為應斷應離之法 經中佛告諸比丘:「應離邪見,應斷邪見……如是邪志、邪語、邪業、邪命、邪方便、邪念、邪定亦如是說。」此處的論述模式為「如……亦如是說」,即在說明應離、應斷邪見之後,將同樣的道理直接套用於邪語等其他七項邪法之上。經文指出,若不離邪語,將導致「非義不饒益苦」——即無義、無利而招致苦惱;反之,若能離邪語而修正語,則「以義饒益,常得安樂」。此一因果架構是邪語在此經中的核心表述:邪語不離則招苦,離邪語修正語則得安樂。

二、邪語作為不正思惟之果 此經進一步從內法(內在因緣)的角度,論述邪語生起的根源。經云:「於內法中,我不見一法能令未生惡不善法生,已生者重生令增廣,如說不正思惟者。諸比丘!不正思惟者,未起邪見令起,已起重生令增廣。如是邪志、邪語、邪業……亦如是說。」也就是說,邪語被視為「不正思惟」的連帶果報——內心起了不正思惟,便會引發邪語等八項邪法;反之,若行「正思惟」,則能使邪語等「未生者令不生,已生者令滅」。在此脈絡中,邪語屬於「未生令生、已生令增廣」的惡不善法,其正對治是「正思惟」,而非直接從語言行為本身著手。

三、邪語作為外緣感召之法 此經又從外法(外在因緣)的角度,補充邪語生起的助緣。經云:「於外法中,我不見一法令未生惡不善法生,已生惡不善法重生令增廣,如說惡知識、惡伴黨、惡隨從。」經文指出,惡知識、惡伴黨、惡隨從這些外在惡緣,能「令未生邪語令生,已生邪語重生令增廣」;而善知識、善伴黨、善隨從則能使「未生邪語不生,已生邪語令滅」。可見邪語在此經中既受內在的不正思惟推動,也受外在的惡友惡緣影響;對治同樣有內外兩途:內以正思惟為本,外以善知識、善伴黨、善隨從為助緣。

四、術語與結構特徵 《雜阿含經》所用術語為「邪語」二字,與常見的「惡語」、「妄語」、「綺語」、「兩舌」、「惡口」等細分概念有別。此經將邪語嚴格定位為「八邪」之第三項(在邪見、邪志之後),僅作列舉式的簡略說明,未對邪語的具體語相作定義,而是採取「亦如是說」的套語格式,將論述重心置於「離邪修正」的因果關係與「生、滅」的因緣上,呈現出從內法、外法雙重因緣觀察邪語生滅的獨特側面。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

本經《大寶積經》中對「邪語」之論述,主要見於佛陀為長者開示「邪定」之建立因緣時所列之十種惡邪性之中。茲依正文條述其要點如下。

一、邪語列於十惡邪性之第三位。佛告長者:「我觀世間一切眾生,皆由十種惡邪性故建立邪定。何等為十?一者邪見,二者邪思惟,三者邪語,四者邪業,五者邪命,六者邪精進,七者邪念,八者邪定,九者邪解脫,十者邪解脫智見。」此中「邪語」為十項之一,與邪見、邪思惟並列,意、語之根本染污同為邪性所攝。

二、十邪性為邪定之因。經文明示,邪語等十種惡邪性乃「建立邪定」之因緣。換言之,邪語並非孤立之過患,而是與邪定相連繫——凡夫以邪語攝屬於邪定之聚,由是執為究竟之方便,而墮於邪性決定之聚。

三、佛陀以此為出離之對境。經文載,佛陀自述:「我觀眾生由如是等十邪性故建立邪定,為欲證得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,出離如是諸邪性故,以淨信心捨釋氏家趣無上道。」可見邪語等十邪性,正是菩薩發心出家、修無上菩提所應出離之對象,並非僅為消極之禁戒,而是趣向正覺之方便所破。

四、偈頌以「宣說」二字點出邪語之相。世尊以頌重宣其義:「懷邪見眾生,邪思惟境界,宣說於邪語,及行諸邪業,邪命邪精進,邪念與邪定,成就邪解脫,及趣邪智見。邪性決定聚,愚夫之所依,為令住正性,故趣無上道。」此頌以「宣說」點出邪語之口業特質——以口宣說不正之語;而「邪性決定聚,愚夫之所依,為令住正性」一句,明示邪語等十法乃愚夫所依止之決定邪聚,與正性相對而立,菩薩為令眾生安住正性故趣無上道。

五、本經之術語特色。本經直稱「邪語」,未用其他異名,且於此段未對邪語之具體內容(如綺語、妄語、兩舌、惡口等四種語過)作細項分別,僅將其作為十惡邪性之一項而總括列舉。足見本經係從「邪定聚」之總相上施設此名,視邪語為邪定之構成要素,而非對語業本身作獨立深入之剖析。此乃本經論述邪語之獨特側面。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》論「邪語」,主要從業道分類及生因兩方面展開。

一、邪語於八邪支中之位置 本論述及,契經說八邪支中分色業為三,謂邪語、邪業、邪命。邪語與邪業、邪命同屬於身語二業中之染污色業,於八聖道分正語、正業、正命相違而立。

二、邪語之生因 論中明示:瞋癡所生語身二業,如次名為邪語邪業;從貪所生身語二業,以難除故別立邪命。即從瞋、癡二煩惱所發之語業,名為邪語;從貪所發之身語業,以貪能奪諸有情心、所起業難可禁護故,為令殷重修於正命,別立為邪命。此乃本論區分邪語與邪命之關鍵所在。

三、邪語所涵蓋之四語業道 本論依業道分類詳說邪語之具體內容。頌文先列四種染語:虛誑語、離間語、麁惡語、雜穢語。頌云「以開虛誑語,便越諸學處」,「染異想發言,解義虛誑語」,「染心壞他語,說名離間語;非愛麁惡語;諸染雜穢語」。

論釋中進一步闡釋:若染污心發壞他語,不論對方已壞未壞,皆成離間語,解義不誤之句流至此中;若以染心發非愛語毀呰於他,名麁惡語,前染心語流至此故,解義不誤亦與前同,謂本期心所欲罵者,解所說義業道方成;一切染心所發諸語名雜穢語,以染所發言皆雜穢故,唯前「語」字流至此中。

四、雜穢語之範圍及有餘師異說 有餘師說:異虛誑等前三種語,所有一切染心發言名雜穢語,此謂佞歌及邪論等。佞謂諂佞,歌謂歌詠,邪論謂廣辯說諸不正見所執言詞,「等」攝染心所發悲嘆及諸世俗戲論言詞,但異前三染心所發者,一切皆是雜穢語收。論中並設難云:輪王現時亦有歌詠,如何不是雜穢語收?答:由彼語從出離心發,能引出離,非預染心。又有餘師言:爾時亦有成嫁娶等所發染言,由過輕故不成業道。

五、邪語之罪相 頌云「邪行最可訶,易離得不作」,「說曲穢濁業,依諂瞋貪生」,皆明邪語屬邪行,罪可訶責,依諂瞋貪煩惱而生,能令所受學處毀犯。

本論之獨特處在於:以瞋、癡與貪之別,區分邪語與邪命;以染心為主軸,詳分四種語業道;於雜穢語中並兼採有餘師之廣狹異說,呈現學派之別。

Related