Dharma · AI Companion

實性

bhūtatā

诸法离虚妄分别的真实体性。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

初立层=究竟第四重;〔中观:遮诠读,离戏空性〕〔如来藏:表诠读,离言实性〕两镜头进路异而归趣同,皆落离言究竟——v1 已裁定无冲突,v2 镜头记法使其定型。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

这个概念在说什么

In Mahāyāna Buddhism, particularly within the framework of the *Śūraṅgama Sūtra* (*大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經*), **"True Nature" (真性, *zhēnxìng*)** refers to the inherently pure, unchanging, and universally pervasive nature of all phenomena, which transcends the dualism of the real (*zhēn*) and the false (*wàng*).

To understand where *zhēnxìng* sits on the path of liberation (解脫道, *jiětuōdào*), we must begin with the Buddha’s famous diagnosis in the sūtra regarding why sentient beings remain trapped in cyclic existence (輪迴, *lúnhuí*). The Buddha points out that practitioners fail to attain supreme enlightenment because they confuse **"Two Fundamentals" (二種根本, *èrzhǒng gēnběn*)**:

1. The Root of Samsāra: mistaking the transient, conditioned thinking mind—termed **"conditioned phantom images of front dust" (前塵虛妄相想, *qiánchén xūwàng xiāngxiǎng*)**—for one’s actual self. This is described as "mistaking a thief for one's son" (認賊為子, *rèn zéi wéi zǐ*). 2. The Root of Liberation: the unoriginated, eternal, inherently pure body of Bodhi and Nirvāṇa (無始菩提涅槃元清淨體, *wúshǐ pútí nièpán yuán qīngjìng tǐ*). In sentient beings, this is expressed as the **"essence of consciousness originally luminous" (識精元明, *shíjīng yuánmíng*) or the "Original Mind" (本心, *běnxīn*)**. This luminosity produces all conditioned experiences without ever being lost or corrupted by them, yet beings forget it—"losing one's True Nature" (遺失真性, *yíshī zhēnxìng*)—and live in delusion.

To help us recognize this elusive reality, the sūtra uses the act of seeing—**"Seeing-Nature" (見性, *jiànxìng*)**—as a direct entryway to illuminate the essential characteristics of *zhēnxìng*:

* **Unmoving (不動, *búdòng*)**: Outer sights, shadows, emotions, and even the physical body constantly age, shift, and flicker. Yet, the essential capacity of awareness that registers these changes does not alter or shake. * **Pervasive (周遍, *zhōubiàn*)**: Awareness is not a physical object located "inside" the skull, nor does it shrink when enclosed in a tiny room or expand when standing atop a mountain. The spatial constraints belong to the environment ("dust"), not to the awareness itself.

However, the ultimate teaching of *zhēnxìng* goes a step further: it dismantles dualism itself. The sūtra states: > *"True Nature as conditioned is empty, arisen through conditions, hence like an illusion; as unconditioned it has no arising or ceasing, non-substantial, like a sky-flower."* > (真性有為空,緣生故如幻;無為無起滅,不實如空花。)

And further warns: > *"To speak of the false is to reveal the true; yet both false and true are together two falsities."* > (言妄顯諸真,妄真同二妄。)

We use the word "false" (*wàng*) merely to point out the "true" (*zhēn*). If one clings to a conceptual "True Nature" as a solid, sacred object opposed to a bad, illusory world, one has simply fallen into a new layer of conceptual duality.

Even the subtlest seed-consciousness—the **Ādāna consciousness (阿陀那微細識, *ātuónà wēixì shí*)**, whose habitual currents rush like a torrent (習氣成暴流)—lies at the knife-edge between delusion and awakening. Because beings easily confuse this subtle stream with the ultimate True Nature ("真非真恐迷"), the Buddha refrained from casually preaching it to novices. *Zhēnxìng* is neither a subtle mental state nor an object of thought; it is the non-dual, unconditioned reality underlying all experience.


生活里的走查

To understand how we misplace *zhēnxìng* in everyday life, let us walk through three familiar contemporary scenarios and trace where our minds go astray.

``` [ External Stimulus / Event ] │ ▼ [ Sensory Inputs / Signals ] <── "Front Dust" (前塵) │ ▼ [ Psychological Reaction / ] <── "Phantom Thoughts" (虛妄相想) [ Conceptualizing Ego ] (Mistaken for "Me" / 認賊為子) │ │ (Illuminated & Known by) ▼ [ Pure Unmoving Awareness ] <── "True Nature / Seeing-Nature" (真性 / 見性) (Intact, uncreated, non-dual) ```

Scenario 1: Doomscrolling on the Subway

* The Scene: You are riding the subway home after a long day, mindlessly scrolling through news feeds and social media. You hit an infuriating headline or a post comparing someone else's career success to yours. Anxiety and envy surge in your chest. * Mapping the Classical Terms: * The glowing screen, the text, the news content, and the physical fatigue are "front dust" (前塵)—external objects that temporarily pass before your senses. * The immediate cascade of thoughts ("My life is slipping away," "Why are they so lucky?"), along with the physiological feeling of anxiety, is "conditioned phantom images of front dust" (前塵虛妄相想). * Where We Map It Wrong: You say to yourself, "I am an anxious, bitter person." You take the transient wave of mental commentary and emotion to be your actual identity. This is **"losing oneself to objects" (迷己為物, *mí jǐ wéi wù*) and "mistaking a thief for one's son" (認賊為子)**. * Where True Nature Is: Notice the silent, background awareness that *knows* the screen is glowing, *knows* the body is sitting on the subway, and *knows* anxiety has arisen. That background knowing is neither anxious nor envious. The noise on the screen comes and goes; the emotion rises and falls; but the awareness registering them has not moved by a single millimeter (**無所動, *wú suǒ dòng***).

Scenario 2: The High-Stakes Work Crunch

* The Scene: An urgent notification pops up from your supervisor demanding a complete rewrite of a project deck within two hours. Your heart races, your brain kicks into overdrive, and you enter a state of hyper-focused problem-solving. * Mapping the Classical Terms: * The mental processor analyzing data, synthesizing arguments, and drafting slides is the **"evaluating/seeking mind" (能推者, *néng tuī zhě*)**. * Where We Map It Wrong: When Ānanda (阿難) in the *Śūraṅgama Sūtra* tried to locate his mind, he pointed to this exact cognitive function—the ability to think, infer, and analyze. The Buddha sternly corrected him: *This analytical processor is not your mind; it is merely conditioned phantom thought masking your True Nature.* Contemporary professionals frequently mistake their cognitive output and executive function for their "authentic self." * Where True Nature Is: The analytical processor is a sophisticated instrument (like a high-performance computer), but it is an *object* of awareness, not awareness itself. *Zhēnxìng* is that which remains contextually aware of the stress, the analytical thinking, and the relief when the job is finished, without ever becoming consumed by any of them.

Scenario 3: An Argument in an Intimate Relationship

* The Scene: During a heated argument with your partner, they criticize a flaw in your character. Instantly, your ego feels bruised. A wave of defensiveness rises, and you prepare a sharp rebuttal. * Mapping the Classical Terms: * The felt identity being attacked ("my pride," "my reputation") is an internal object—a compound of past memories and self-concepts. It belongs entirely to the realm of "dust" (塵). * Where We Map It Wrong: You believe that defending this conceptual ego is a matter of self-preservation. In the sūtra's words, you have **"mistaken external things for the self" (認物為己, *rèn wù wéi jǐ*)**. * Where True Nature Is: If you pause for a single breath, you can observe the bruised pride as a temporary phenomenon arising in the field of mind. The *True Nature* is the space in which that hurt feeling appears. It cannot be insulted, threatened, or destroyed, because it is inherently unconditioned (**無為, *wúwéi***).


当代人为什么需要它

We live in an age dominated by the "attention economy" and computational algorithms designed to capture, manipulate, and monetize our conditioned phantom thoughts (前塵虛妄相想). Contemporary culture urges us to construct elaborate digital identities, endlessly curate our internal moods, and over-identify with our intellectual productivity. As a result, chronic mental exhaustion, existential disorientation, and alienation are widespread.

The concept of *zhēnxìng* offers a radical recalibration for the modern mind:

1. Freedom from Mental Content: Modern psychology often focuses on *editing* the content of thoughts (e.g., replacing negative thoughts with positive ones). While useful, this remains at the level of managing "dust." *Zhēnxìng* shifts the focus from the *content* of experience to the *nature of the awareness observing it*. You do not need to fix every transient wave in the ocean if you recognize you are the ocean itself. 2. De-escalation of Identity Anxiety: When we realize that our emotions, achievements, and social standing are conditioned objects, the urge to constantly defend or burnish the ego dissolves.

Dialogue with Contemporary Science and AI

It is insightful to contrast *zhēnxìng* with modern neurobiology and Artificial Intelligence, provided we recognize the clear boundaries between them.

``` ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Phenomenal Reality │ ├───────────────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Conditioned Realm ("Dust" / 塵) │ Unconditioned Basis (True Nature) │ ├───────────────────────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────┤ │ • Brain States / Neural Signals │ │ │ • Cognitive Processing / LLMs │ • Pure Unmoving Awareness │ │ • Emotions, Ego-Models, Thoughts │ • Non-dual, Uncreated Knowing │ │ (Studied by Empirical Science) │ (Realized via Direct Insight) │ └───────────────────────────────────┴────────────────────────────────────┘ ```

* Neuroscience: Modern neuroscience maps brain networks—such as the Default Mode Network (DMN), associated with self-referential thought—and tracks how neurochemistry correlates with emotions. However, neuroscience operates strictly within the empirical realm of observable phenomena—what Buddhism calls "front dust" (前塵). Science examines the physical mechanisms of cognition; it does not measure or isolate the unconditioned, non-dual awareness (真性) that transcends physical causality. Observing neural firing patterns is like studying the electronics inside a television set; it explains how the picture is displayed, but not the ultimate nature of conscious experience itself. * Artificial Intelligence: Large Language Models and AI agents excel at pattern recognition, logical deduction, and complex synthesis. In the language of the *Śūraṅgama Sūtra*, AI simulates the "evaluating processor" (能推者) to an extraordinary degree. Yet, an AI possesses no *zhēnxìng* awareness; it processes syntax and associations without intrinsic luminosity (識精元明).

A Necessary Caveat: Empirical science has *not* "proven" or "validated" the Buddhist concept of *zhēnxìng*. Science studies conditioned, measurable, objectified phenomena (**有為法, *yǒuwéi fǎ***). *Zhēnxìng* is inherently unconditioned (**無為法, *wúwéi fǎ***) and non-dual, inaccessible to objective instruments. Using scientific findings as a proxy or "proof" for spiritual insight conflates the physical object of knowledge with the unconditioned nature of awareness itself.


常见误读与澄清

Because *zhēnxìng* utilizes words like "True" (*zhēn*) and "Nature" (*xìng*), it is easily misunderstood—both by beginners and by experienced practitioners.

Misunderstanding 1: Treating True Nature as an Inherent "Soul" or "Substance" (Atman / 大我)

* The Error: Viewing *zhēnxìng* as a glowing, permanent core or spiritual entity sitting inside the body, akin to a Western concept of a soul or a Hindu *Ātman*. * Clarification: *Zhēnxìng* is not a "thing." The *Śūraṅgama Sūtra* explicitly cautions that *zhēnxìng* is empty of inherent substance (真性有為空; 無為...不實如空花). To objectify *zhēnxìng* as a substance is to turn it into another mental concept—another piece of "dust." It refers to the nature of non-dual awareness, which lacks any fixed, independent solidity.

Misunderstanding 2: Confusing True Nature with a Calm, Serene State of Mind (入定 / 心静)

* The Error: Believing that *zhēnxìng* is only present when you are meditating peacefully in a quiet room, and that it disappears when you are angry, stressed, or confused. * Clarification: Calmness (*jìng*) and agitation (*dòng*) are dualistic conditions of the mental environment (塵境). *Zhēnxìng* is the unmoving context that encompasses both. The awareness that perceives a chaotic, noisy mind is just as complete as the awareness that perceives a quiet mind. If *zhēnxìng* could be lost during moments of stress, it would be a created, temporary state (有為法), not the eternal, original nature.

Misunderstanding 3: Equating True Nature with "Authentic Personality" or "True Feelings" (真性情)

* The Error: Using the term *zhēnxìng* colloquially to mean acting on raw impulses, gut feelings, or "being authentic" to one's emotional moods. * Clarification: Emotional impulses—whether raw, authentic, or suppressed—are conditioned psychological phenomena (前塵虛妄相想). *Zhēnxìng* is not an emotional state; it is the luminous awareness in which all emotional states arise and pass away.

Misunderstanding 4: Falling into the Trap of "Rejecting the False to Chase the True"

* The Error: Engaging in a spiritual struggle to suppress all daily thoughts, emotions, and worldly interactions in a desperate search to grasp an elusive "True Nature." * Clarification: The sūtra explicitly warns against this subtle dualistic trap: > *"To speak of the false is to reveal the true; yet both false and true are together two falsities."* > (言妄顯諸真,妄真同二妄。)

Attempting to eliminate "false thoughts" in order to grab hold of "true nature" simply creates a new conflict within the mind. When you realize that phantom thoughts have no independent reality of their own—that they are like waves on the water—there is no need to destroy the waves to find the water. The moment you stop identifying with the passing phantoms, *zhēnxìng* reveals itself as fully present, inherently complete, and eternally undisturbed.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义 在《大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經》中,“真性”是指诸法真实不变的本性。它是众生本自具足、元自清净的体性,具有不动、周遍、非真非妄等超越性特征。众生因迷失此本性而流转诸趣,修行之要在于否定前尘妄想,认清并回归自身的真性。

二、主要阐述 经文从多个维度对“真性”展开了深入论述: 首先,真性是众生本有的清净实体。经中指出,众生因“不知二種根本錯亂修習”而流转,其一便是“無始菩提、涅槃元清淨體”,此体在众生位即表现为“識精元明”,能生诸缘而不被诸缘所遗失,但众生遗失了这一“本明”,虽终日行持却不自知。此外,经中也常用“本心”来指代这一真实本性,指出众生“迷己為物,失於本心”。 其次,真性与妄想、前尘有着严格的区别。阿难曾将能推求寻逐的“能推者”误认为心,佛陀则直斥其非,指出这只是“前塵虛妄相想,惑汝真性”。众生在念念生灭中“遺失真性”,导致“性心失真,認物為己”,从而在轮回中自取流转。 第三,经文通过“見性”的具体特征来阐释真性。见性即是“精妙明”之体。与会生灭、摇动的尘境和身体不同,见性本身是“無所動”的;且见性具有“周遍”的特征,不因器物的大小或墙宇的阻隔而产生舒缩。佛陀强调,见性是众生自己而非他人,众生不应当怀疑自己的“真性”,误以为其不真实而向外求实。 最后,真性具有超越真妄二分的本质。经中指出:“真性有為空,緣生故、如幻;無為無起滅,不實、如空花。” 言说“妄”是为了显现“真”,但实际上“妄、真同二妄”,若落入真与非真的执着,则依然是迷妄。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异 在阐释众生本源清净体时,经文交替使用不同的术语。例如,在指出众生流转根源时,使用“真際”与“無始菩提、涅槃元清淨體”;在描述其在众生身上的具体表现时,使用“識精元明”与“本明”;在描述众生因执着外物而迷失时,则使用“本心”与“真性”。此外,在探讨微细识与真性的关系时,提及了“陀那微細識”,并指出因“真非真恐迷”而未便轻宣。这些不同的用词反映了经文在不同论述侧重点上的表述差异。

四、与相关概念的关系 1. 与“真际”、“本心”、“本明”的关系:这些概念与“真性”同体异名,皆指代众生无始以来的清净本位。众生因“不知真際所詣”、“失於本心”而流转。 2. 与“前尘妄想”的关系:前尘妄想是生灭、虚妄的幻相,会迷惑众生的真性(“前塵虛妄相想,惑汝真性”),导致众生“性心失真”。 3. 与“见性”的关系:见性是真性在视觉层面的具体显现,具有“無所動”与“周遍”的特征,是认识真性的关键途径。 4. 与“陀那微细识”的关系:陀那微细识的习气如暴流般汹涌,因其处于真与非真的迷悟关节点,佛陀因“真非真恐迷”而未常用其说明真性。

五、代表性原文引用 1. “不知真際所詣,旋汝往返……二者、無始菩提涅槃元清淨體,則汝今者識精元明,能生諸緣,遺失元妙。諸修行人,不能得成無上菩提……皆由不知二種根本錯亂修習。” 2. “此非汝心。此是前塵虛妄相想,惑汝真性。由汝無始至于今生,認賊為子,失汝元常,故受輪轉。” 3. “一切眾生,從無始來,迷己為物,失於本心,為物所轉,故於是中觀大觀小。若能轉物,則同如來,身心圓明,不動道場,於一毛端遍能含受十方國土。” 4. “真性有為空,緣生故、如幻;無為無起滅,不實、如空花。言妄顯諸真,妄真同二妄。猶非真非真,云何見所見?中間無實性,是故若交蘆。阿陀那微細,習氣成暴流,真非真恐迷,我常不開演。”

By SutraAI-generated

菩提道次第略論B0065 · 藏傳論典部

《菩提道次第略論》以緣起無自性說明「實性」:一切諸法皆由因緣和合而幻有,緣會則生,緣散則滅;既不可因諸法本無實性而執為實有,也不可因其僅是假名安立便撥為全無。生死依妄執假有為實有而成立,涅槃亦依斷障安立,故對二者皆不應落入實有之相執。

本論又以「真實性」「真實」「法性」「勝義諦」等語表述此義。其判別要點是:正理所破的是諸法實有、自性所成之自體,並非破壞諸法的名言假有。說諸法無實,與因了知空性過患而墮入斷空之見並不相同;生死與涅槃俱無自性,涅槃乃依所了知的三有無性而安立。空性確有,但不是諦實;其所遮除者,是對實有的計執。

論中釋「勝義」為既是義又是最勝,並說「此即是真實,名勝義諦」。勝義諦的不錯亂,在於法性如其所住、如其所現而被照見;然而勝義諦本身仍僅隨世俗名言安立為有。稱量真實性的無漏智所得,並不是另一個實有自性;所謂見如所有,是如眼翳消除後空中毛輪全不顯現,以無明障翳與習氣滅盡之智,於所緣諸法上不見可成立的自性,此種所見即稱勝義諦。

「不見」並非對任何境界全無照見,而是對本來被假定為實有的真實性全無所見,並由此照見諸法真實;故論中說「無所見,即是勝見」。又以虛空為喻:見虛空即是不見障礙,同樣地,見真實性即是不見五蘊的自性。所謂能所雙亡,是現證真實時遠離分別所行之境,並非佛不通達勝義,也非全無心與心所。

本論同時明言勝義諦並非斷滅之無:它不是新作,不待他緣,而是淨離無明障翳之智所證的法性;若勝義全無,菩薩修道、究竟清淨涅槃以及如來出世皆成無義。所謂證真實,是從假立而說;實性並非可被分割為少分少分而知,因能知與所知皆自性無生。

在修證方法上,本論使用「真實性」「實性」「法性」「如所有性」等詞,主張須先得無我正見,再以智慧別別觀擇而修,令觀察修與安立修相互配合;若未得無我見,所修便不能住於真實性。 清淨分別能引生聖者智慧,如鑽木生火後反燒其木;若不以智慧觀察諸法自性,只求全斷作意,便不能滅除分別妄想,也不能證得其無自性的虛妄。故本論所說離虛妄分別,並非一開始排斥一切分別,而是由清淨觀擇生起如所有見,進而超越能所分別。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》論「實性」,兼用「實性」與「真實性」二種術語形式,且將二者統攝於「真如」之下,構成明確的等義關係。

一、真如即實性:本經最核心的界定見於佛告舍利子一段:「夫真如者即是實性、即是如性,是非不如性、是不遠離性、是無發動性、是無嬈亂性、是不相違性、是無違諍性。」 此處以七重謂語界定實性,皆取否定式(無發動、無嬈亂、不相違、無違諍)與不離式(不遠離、非不如),將實性刻画為離一切動亂違諍的寂靜體性。經文又強調「無違無諍說名如來」,如來之所以為如來,正在於徹底無違諍,而菩薩為度生故「常現一切違諍」,此即實性在果位與因位上的不同顯用。

二、三時真如與諸法真如不一不異:本經以大量排比鋪陳過去、未來、現在三世真如互不相違,進而謂「去來現在真如即蘊界處真如」「蘊界處真如即染污清淨真如」「染污清淨真如即流轉寂滅真如」「流轉寂滅真如即加行真如」「加行真如即一切行真如」,最終結歸「一切行即是真如,而此真如即一切行」。此段將實性(真如)從抽象理體展開為貫穿三世、染淨、流轉寂滅的普遍法則,且以「即」字表示非離諸法別有實性。

三、證實性得菩提:偈頌部分以固定句式反覆宣說「了貪盡邊常空寂,證其實性得菩提」,並依次替換為貪之生邊、邊際、寂靜、流轉、無有、無生、寂滅,凡八種面向。此處「實性」指貪等煩惱當體空寂之性,了達此空寂即為「證實性」,而證實性即得菩提——實性並非離煩惱別有一物,正是煩惱之空寂邊際。此為本經論實性最具特色的修行論表述。

四、佛見真實性:偈頌中另以「佛見真實性」「佛知真實性」為結句,描述如來所見之境:「諸法無垢染,佛見真實性」、「已得解脫門,無有解脫者,煩惱本亦無,佛見真實性」、「如來念諸受,由受苦世間,眾生煩惱縛,佛知真實性」。此數偈顯示真實性並非離垢染、離解脫、離苦受而獨存在,而是即於垢染本無、解脫者不可得、苦受流轉之中,佛以如實智見其真實。

五、住法界而見真實性:「世尊住法界,見法真實性,不依亦不離,不取復不捨」,以「不依不離、不取不捨」四句描述如來住於法界時見真實性的姿態,與前文「無發動性、無嬈亂性」相呼應。「諸法真實性,世尊皆悉知」 則總括佛智於一切法真實性無不遍知。

術語小結:本經以「實性」與「真實性」並用,且明文以「真如」釋「實性」(真如者即是實性),三者在本經語境中構成等義鏈。偈頌部分多用「真實性」,散文部分(舍利子段)則用「實性」並賦予七重界定,此為本經用語的內部分佈。

大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經T0945 · 密教部

《大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經》論述諸法真實體性時,並不以「實性」為主要術語,而慣用「真性」「本明」「識精元明」「見性」「真際」等詞,構成該經獨特的概念表達。

一、二種根本之對舉。經中佛告阿難,一切眾生不能成無上菩提,乃至別成聲聞、緣覺、外道、天魔,「皆由不知二種根本錯亂修習」。其一為「無始生死根本」,即「與諸眾生用攀緣心為自性者」;其二為「無始菩提、涅槃元清淨體」,即「識精元明,能生諸緣緣所遺者」。此第二根本即是真實體性在該經中的核心表述:以「識精元明」指稱本具之明覺,謂其能生起諸緣,卻為諸緣所遺忘。經云「由諸眾生遺此本明,雖終日行而不自覺,枉入諸趣」,強調真性非從外得,乃眾生終日運用而不自知之本來面目。

二、以「前塵虛妄相想」為遮蔽真性之妄。阿難以「能推者」為心,佛直斥「此非汝心」,判定其為「前塵虛妄相想,惑汝真性」。此處「真性」與「虛妄相想」構成該經特有的真妄對立框架:真性本自具足,所惑者唯是前塵影事,非有實體。

三、以見性之不動顯真性之常住。佛令阿難觀頭動而見不動、手開合而見無舒卷,由此結示:「以搖動者名之為塵,以不住者名之為客」,動者屬客屬塵,不動者方為主為真。經文直指眾生「從始洎終念念生滅遺失真性,顛倒行事,性心失真,認物為己;輪迴是中,自取流轉」。此處「遺失真性」「性心失真」為該經論述真實體性之直接用語,而「認物為己」則點出迷失之機制。

四、見性周遍、無舒無縮。經中進一步以「見精清淨」「見性無殊」說明真性之體:萬物差殊,而能見之性無別,「此精妙明,誠汝見性」。針對阿難疑見性入室則縮、出室則大,佛以方器中虛空為喻:「空體無方,不應說言更除虛空方相所在」,見性本無大小內外之變,所謂舒縮唯屬前塵。經末結云「一切眾生從無始來迷己為物,失於本心,為物所轉」,與前文「認物為己」互為表裏。

五、術語特徵。該經論真實體性時,用「真性」而非「實性」,用「識精元明」「本明」而非「如來藏」「佛性」,用「見性」「見精」作為現量可證之切入,用「真際」指稱真性之所歸(阿難請佛開示「真際所詣」)。整體論述以「真—妄」「主—客」「動—不動」三組對立為骨架,不立名相體系,而從當下能見之性直顯本具清淨,是該經有別於他經的獨特進路。

Related