Dharma · AI Companion

四識住

catasro vijñāna-sthitayaḥ

识依色受想行四蕴而住。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

四识住明识依四蕴而住,属缘起分析,借性空遮破升2。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Talking About

(这个概念在说什么)

The Four Abodes of Consciousness (*catur-vijñānasthiti*, 四識住) describes the four physical and psychological territories where consciousness (*vijñāna*, 識) anchors itself, feeds, and proliferates.

In short: Consciousness does not exist as a floating, self-sustained entity. It must cling to, inhabit, and feed upon four specific non-consciousness domains—Form, Sensation, Perception, and Volitional Formations—in order to sustain its continuous cycle of birth, growth, and rebirth.

To understand this concept deeply, we must first map the components with exact canonical precision, avoiding the common temptation to oversimplify or translate them into vague modern terms:

1. **Consciousness (*vijñāna*, 識): The capacity for discriminative awareness ("了別"). It is the cognitive feature that discerns, knows, and categorizes objects (such as discerning sights, sounds, or mental ideas). 2. Form (*rūpa*, 色): All four great elements (earth, water, fire, wind) and the physical matter derived from them. Precision check**: Form is *not* merely your physical body (*肉身*); it includes all outer material phenomena, physical objects, light, sound, and spatial environments. 3. **Sensation / Feeling (*vedanā*, 受): The immediate affective tone or sensory charge—pleasant, painful, or neutral. Precision check: Sensation is not complex thoughts or emotional stories; it is the raw, visceral feeling tone. 4. Perception / Cognition (*saṃjñā*, 想): The mental function of recognizing, identifying, and taking marks ("取相識別"). Precision check**: Perception is not just "having an idea" (*想法*); it is the cognitive labeling mechanism that says, "This is a laptop," "This is an insult," or "This is safe." 5. **Volitional Formations (*saṃskāra*, 行): The internal impulses, intentions, mental drives, and volitional momentum ("意志造作"). Precision check**: Formations refer to internal volitional impulses and psychological driving forces, *not* external physical actions or movements (*外在行動*).

The Dynamic Mechanism: Seeds, Soil, and Water

In the *Saṃyuktāgama* (*雜阿含經*), the Buddha explains that consciousness operates through a precise ecosystem:

* **The Seeds (*五種子*)**: Consciousness bound with grasping (*取陰俱識*). * **The Soil / Earth Element (*地界*)**: The Four Abodes—Form, Sensation, Perception, and Volitional Formations. * **The Water / Moisture (*水界*)**: Craving, delight, and attachment (*貪喜 / 愛樂*).

Just as a seed cannot sprout in empty space and requires fertile soil (*地界*) combined with moisture (*水界*) to grow, consciousness cannot survive in a vacuum. It relies on one or more of the four abodes (soil) and is fueled by craving and attachment (water). Under these conditions, consciousness experiences arrival, departure, residence, growth, and proliferation ("若來、若去、若住、若起、生長增廣").

The classical scriptures emphasize an absolute boundary: Consciousness cannot move, stay, or grow outside these four domains. To claim that consciousness can abide in some "other realm" apart from Form, Sensation, Perception, and Formations is declared in the Agamas to be pure fantasy—"mere words" (*但有言數*) that yield only confusion.

The Frontier City Metaphor (*邊國城門喻*)

To help practitioners visualize the mechanics of mind and liberation, the *Saṃyuktāgama* provides a vivid spatial metaphor: * **The City (*城*)**: The psychophysical human organism. * **The Lord of the City (*城主*)**: Consciousness (*識受陰*). * **The Four City Gates (*四城門*)**: The Four Abodes of Consciousness (*四識住*). * **The Four Gatekeepers (*四守門者*)**: The Four Foundations of Mindfulness (*四念處*—mindfulness of body, feeling, mind, and mental phenomena). * **The Messengers (*使者*)**: Tranquility and Insight (*止、觀* / *Śamatha* and *Vipaśyanā*).

In this metaphor, the Four Abodes are the four primary gateways through which consciousness interacts with and gets trapped by external and internal worlds.

The Nature of the Aggregates: Classical Similes

When examining why consciousness becomes trapped in these four abodes, the scriptures remind us of the illusory nature of the five aggregates (*五陰譬喻經* / *Saṃyuktāgama* 265): * **Form (*色*) is like a cluster of foam (*聚沫*)**: Hollow, fragile, and devoid of solid essence. * **Sensation (*受*) is like a water bubble (*水泡*)**: Popping as soon as it arises, inherently unstable. * **Perception (*想*) is like a mirage / shimmering heat (*野馬 / 陽焰*)**: Deceptive, tricking the eye into seeing water where there is none. * **Volitional Formations (*行*) are like a plantain trunk (*芭蕉*)**: Peeled layer by layer, revealing no hard core inside. * **Consciousness (*識*) is like a magic trick / illusion (*幻*)**: Creating a show of solid realities out of fleeting, interdependent conditions.

Liberation: From Consciousness (*識*) to Wisdom (*智*)

If consciousness grows through craving and residence, liberation consists of removing the "water" (craving). When craving for Form, Sensation, Perception, and Formations is abandoned, the mental bondage (*意生縛*) snaps. Consciousness becomes "non-abiding" (*無所住*). Devoid of a landing place to take root, consciousness no longer proliferates or creates future karmic momentum.

In Mahāyāna texts like the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*大寶積經*), this principle matures into the paradigm of **"Relying on Wisdom, Not Consciousness" (*依智不依識*). While consciousness is characterized by discriminative grasping within the four abodes, Wisdom (*智*)** is characterized by non-abiding (*不安住*). Wisdom understands the true nature (*法性*) of consciousness, remaining quiet, unattached, and free from discursive conceptualization.


Walkthrough in Daily Life

(生活里的走查)

To see how the Four Abodes of Consciousness operate, let us walk through a familiar contemporary scene: It is 11:00 PM, you are lying in bed, and you open a work communication app or social media on your smartphone.

``` [ Outer Stimulus / Screen ] │ ▼ 1. Form Abode (色識住) ──► Light, glass, text layout, room ambient noise │ ▼ 2. Sensation Abode (受識住) ──► Unpleasant tightness in chest / sting of anxiety │ ▼ 3. Perception Abode (想識住) ──► Labeling: "Urgent email," "Incompetent manager," "Threat" │ ▼ 4. Formations Abode (行識住) ──► Volitional urge: "I must reply immediately and defend myself!" │ ▲ └────── Lubricated by Craving/Fear (水界) ──► Consciousness proliferates & gets trapped ```

Step 1: The Abode of Form (*色識住*)

* The Scenario: Blue light emits from the screen; your eyes register high-contrast typography; your body sits propped against pillows in a quiet bedroom. * How Consciousness Abides: Consciousness lands on the material environment—the visual input of the phone, the physical sensation of holding the cold glass, and the surrounding space. * Common Mis-mapping: People often think "Form" means only "my physical body." In reality, Form includes the smartphone screen, the room's temperature, the sound of street traffic, and the physical eye organs. Consciousness uses all of these physical phenomena as its initial anchor.

Step 2: The Abode of Sensation (*受識住*)

* The Scenario: You read a critical message from a manager or client. Instantly, an uncomfortable, unpleasant sensory charge (*苦受*) ripples through your nervous system—a knot in the pit of your stomach, a spike in heart rate. * How Consciousness Abides: Consciousness immediately pivots from the physical screen to this unpleasant feeling tone. It clings to the discomfort, obsessing over the bad feeling itself. * Common Mis-mapping: Conflating "Sensation" (*受*) with analytical thoughts or emotional storylines. Sensation is purely the raw affective value: *pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral*.

Step 3: The Abode of Perception (*想識住*)

* The Scenario: Within milliseconds, your cognitive system categorizes the raw input: "This is an attack," "This email threatens my job security," "This person is unfair." * How Consciousness Abides: Consciousness enters the domain of conceptual labeling (*取相識別*). It takes the fleeting words on the screen and constructs a rigid mental model of "Me vs. Threatening Other." * Common Mis-mapping: mistaking "Perception" (*想*) for general, deliberate thinking. Perception is specifically the automatic feature that recognizes patterns, assigns labels, and carves up reality into distinct concepts based on past memory.

Step 4: The Abode of Formations (*行識住*)

* The Scenario: An intense internal impulse ignites: "I need to type a furious response right now! I need to prove I am right!" * How Consciousness Abides: Consciousness anchors itself in this volitional urge (*意志造作*). Driven by fear and defense mechanisms, consciousness churns violently within this internal pressure to act. * Common Mis-mapping: Thinking "Formations" (*行*) refers to the actual physical movement of your fingers tapping on the keyboard. Formations are the *internal volitional drives and intentions*, not the physical actions themselves.

The Proliferation of Consciousness

Notice what happens when moisture (*水界*—craving, fear, aversion) waters these four abodes: Consciousness bounces frantically between the phone screen (Form), the tightness in your stomach (Sensation), the label of "Unfair Attack" (Perception), and the urge to strike back (Formations).

Instead of remaining a simple, transient event, consciousness becomes heavy, solid, and entangled. You lose sleep, rumination builds, and mental distress expands ("長增廣").


Why Contemporary People Need It

(当代人为什么需要它)

Contemporary life can be described as an engine specifically engineered to capture and farm human consciousness through the Four Abodes.

1. The Algorithmic Capture of the Abodes

Modern digital feeds are optimized around the four abodes: * They use visual and auditory Form (vivid video, bright red notification badges). * They target Sensation by deliberately provoking micro-hits of pleasure (dopamine) or outrage (cortisol). * They manipulate Perception by reinforcing echo chambers and binary labels ("Us vs. Them"). * They trigger Formations by prompting instant interactions (like, comment, retweet, buy now).

Without an understanding of the Four Abodes, we live on cognitive auto-pilot. Our consciousness gets dragged through these four gates hundreds of times a day, leaving us exhausted, anxious, and perpetually dissatisfied.

2. Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue: AI, Cognitive Science, and Their Limitations

Modern neurobiology and cognitive science offer fascinating parallels to this ancient framework: * Predictive Processing & Perception: Cognitive science shows that the brain does not passively receive reality; it actively projects top-down predictions and labels based on past experience—strikingly close to the Buddhist definition of **Perception (*想*)** as pattern-recognition and feature-selection. * Reinforcement Learning & Formations: AI algorithms utilize reward signals to build policy networks that drive action selection, mirroring how **Volitional Formations (*行*) are fueled by emotional sensory charges (Sensation**) to produce habit loops.

Important Distinction & Limitation: While cognitive science and neuroscience map the neural correlates and computational mechanisms of perception and behavior, they do so largely from a functional, descriptive perspective. Science describes *how* the apparatus functions; Buddhism provides an existential diagnostic and a practical path of liberation. Neuroscience observes how attention gets captured; Buddhism shows how to untie the knot of craving (*貪喜*) so consciousness can rest unmoored and free.


Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications

(常见误读与澄清)

Misunderstanding 1: "Consciousness can exist independently outside the physical body and mental states."

* Clarification: Some modern spiritual narratives claim that pure consciousness exists as an independent entity totally detached from physical or mental conditions. However, the *Agamas* explicitly reject this. The scriptures state that trying to demonstrate a consciousness that comes, goes, or grows entirely separate from Form, Sensation, Perception, and Formations is impossible—it is "mere verbal speculation" (*但有言數*). In early Buddhist thought, consciousness is fundamentally relational: it only arises in dependence on conditions.

Misunderstanding 2: "Un-abiding consciousness (*無所住*) means stopping all thoughts or becoming braindead."

* Clarification: "Non-abiding" (*無所住*) does not mean inducing a state of mental blankness or suppressing sensory experience. It means removing the *attachment and craving* (*貪喜 / 水界*) that glue consciousness to its objects. A liberated mind still sees physical forms, experiences sensory feelings, recognizes concepts, and forms intentions, but consciousness no longer takes up residence in them or builds a rigid self-narrative around them.

Misunderstanding 3: Confusing the components of the Four Abodes.

* Clarification: * *Form is not just the physical body*: It includes all external physical objects, light waves, sound waves, and environments. * *Sensation is not complex emotion or thought*: It is strictly the raw valence (pleasant / unpleasant / neutral). * *Perception is not random thinking*: It is the cognitive mechanism of marking, identifying, and categorizing concepts. * *Formations are not outer actions*: They are inner volitional momentum, drives, and intentions.

Misunderstanding 4: "Consciousness and Wisdom (*智*) are basically the same thing."

* Clarification: As emphasized in the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra*, Consciousness (*識*) operates through discriminative, dualistic grasping that gets stuck in the four abodes. Wisdom (*智*), on the other hand, is the clear, non-grasping realization that penetrates the empty, transient nature of all five aggregates. Consciousness constructs and clings; Wisdom sees through the construction and remains serenely at peace.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

1. 定义与核心要义

「四识住」(梵语:catur-vijñānasthiti)是佛教中关于“识”之运作与系缚的核心概念。简单而言,四识住是指“识”在色、受、想、行这四种非识的阴(或蕴)中驻留、攀缘、执著并得以生长增广的四种状态。

在佛教经典中,识的活动并非孤立存在,它必须以色、受、想、行为所依缘。当识对这四者产生喜贪与爱乐时,便会安住其中,从而产生来去、驻留、生长、增广等生命流转的现象。若能断除对这四种境界的贪爱,使识无所依住,便能实现解脱与涅槃。

2. 主要阐述

不同部类的经典从各自的修行框架出发,对四识住的运作机制、修行实践进行了深入阐述:

(1)《杂阿含经》的系统论述:运作、譬喻与解脱

在《杂阿含经》中,四识住(或称“攀缘四识住”)被视为众生生死流转的根本机制。 * 运作机制:识在色、受、想、行四受阴中的活动,表现为“若来、若去、若住、若没(或作‘起’)、若生(或作‘灭’)长增广”。识的生长必须依赖对这四受阴的攀缘与贪喜润泽。经中强调,识的活动空间仅限于此四者,若有人声称存在色、受、想、行之外的“异法”能让识来去、驻留或生长,那纯属虚妄的言说(“但有言数”或“但有言说”),非其境界,强行追问只会增加愚痴。 * 经典譬喻: 1. *种子与地界喻*:经中将“取阴俱识”比喻为“五种子”(根、茎、节、自落、实种子),将“四识住”比喻为“地界”(土壤),将“贪喜四取攀缘”比喻为“水界”(水分)。正如种子必须同时获得地界与水界的滋润才能生长增广,识也必须安住在四识住(地界)中,并受到贪喜(水界)的润泽,才能不断生长增广。 2. *边国城门喻*:经中将人身比喻为“城”,将“识受阴”比喻为“城主”,而将“四识住”比喻为“四城门”(即四门),将“四念处”比喻为“四守门者”,将“止、观”比喻为“使者”。在这个比喻中,四识住作为“城门”,是识与外界沟通、出入的关键通道。 * 断除与解脱:修行者若能对色、受、想、行界离贪,就能断除对这些境界的“意生缚”(或称“封滞意生缚”)。一旦意生缚断除,识的“攀缘”亦随之断除。失去攀缘后,识便“无住处”(或“无所住”),不再生长增广,亦不再造作(“不作行”或“无所为作”)。识因无所住、不增长、不造作而得以安住、知足并获得解脱,对世间无所取著,最终自觉涅槃,证得“我生已尽,梵行已立,所作已作,自知不受后有”。

(2)《大宝积经》的独特阐述:依智不依识

在大乘经典《大宝积经》中,四识住的论述被置于“依智不依识”的修行框架中,用以指导菩萨的修行取向。 * 运作机制:经中指出,所谓“四识住”,是指识所依止而驻留、生长的四种状态。其具体运作机制表现为识与色、受、想、行四蕴的相互作用。包括:以色为缘、住于色中的“色识住”(或称“色趣识所依止”);以受为缘、住于受中的“受识住”(或称“受趣识所依止”);以想为缘、住于想中的“想识住”(或称“想趣识所依止”);以及以行为缘、住于行中的“行识住”(或称“行趣识所依止”)。识在这些状态中,皆因生起喜著而转加增长、坚固与广大。 * 依智不依识的修行抉择:本经论述“四识住”的独特之处,在于将其置于“依智不依识”的修行框架中进行对比。首先,识的局限(不应依趣)在于上述四识住即是“识”的相状。因为识会依附于四蕴而产生执著与增广,所以菩萨摩诃萨在修行般若波罗蜜多时,明确“不应依趣”此四识住。此外,识的本质在于“了别”,如了别地水火风四大界,以及了别眼所知色至意所知法等六境。相反,智的超越(应当依趣)在于其特征为“不住五受蕴中、了达识蕴”,或者“于五取蕴识不安住。诸蕴遍智”。经中强调,若能做到“四种识住识不安住”,这便契入了“识之法性”;而对此法性不杂乱的智慧,才是应当依趣的“智”。智的表现是内心寂静、外在寻伺不行,不对任何一法产生分别与种种分别。

3. 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同部类及同经的不同译本中,对于“四识住”及相关概念的用词存在明显的差异: * 五蕴的称呼: * 《杂阿含经》中,译者使用“五受阴”来指代通常所说的“五蕴”,具体包括“色受阴,受、想、行、识受阴”。 * 《大宝积经》中,则交替使用了“五受蕴”与“五取蕴”这两种称呼,并将“识”单独抽离出来称为“识蕴”。 * 四识住的异名: * 《杂阿含经》中称为“四识住”或“攀缘四识住”。 * 《大宝积经》中,除了直接使用“色识住”、“受识住”、“想识住”、“行识住”外,还使用了“色趣识所依止”、“受趣识所依止”、“想趣识所依止”、“行趣识所依止”这一套较为特殊的表述形式。 * 运作机制的用词差异: * 《杂阿含经》中描述识的活动为“若来、若去、若住、若没(或作‘起’)、若生(或作‘灭’)长增广”。 * 《大宝积经》中则描述为“生喜住著,转加增长、坚固与广大”。 * 解脱状态的用词差异: * 《杂阿含经》中,断除贪爱后,识“无住处”(或“无所住”),不再生长增广,亦不再造作(“不作行”或“无所为作”)。 * 《大宝积经》中,则表述为“四种识住识不安住”、“不住五受蕴中、了达识蕴”。

4. 与相关概念的关系

* 四识住与五受阴(五取蕴):四识住是识(识受阴/识蕴)与前四阴(色、受、想、行)之间的互动关系。识是能住、能攀缘的主体,而色、受、想、行则是识所安住、攀缘的客体。 * 四识住与四念处、止观:在《杂阿含经》的“边国城门喻”中,四识住作为“四城门”,是识出入的通道;而“四念处”则是“四守门者”,负责防守城门;“止、观”则是“使者”,通过防守城门(四识住)和修习止观,能够引导识走向解脱。 * 识与智:在《大宝积经》中,四识住是“识”的相状,表现为对四蕴的执著与了别;而“智”则是对四识住“不安住”,能够了达识蕴、通达“识之法性”,表现为内心寂静、无分别。

5. 代表性原文引用

* 《杂阿含经》:“有四识住。何等为四?谓色识住、受识住、想识住、行识住。于此四处,识来、去、住、起、生,长增广。” 又云:“譬如五种子……地界者,如四识住;水界者,如贪喜四取攀缘。” * 《大宝积经》:“何等为四?所谓色识住、受识住、想识住、行识住。色识住者,识以色为缘,住于色中,生喜住著,转加增长坚固广大……菩萨摩诃萨行般若波罗蜜多时,于此四识住不应依趣。”

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

本部《雜阿含經》論「四識住」散見於三段,層次互補而側重不同。

一、以種子為喻,明四識住之體性。本經以五種子為譬,說取陰俱識之生長須待「地、水界」具足。經云:「地界者,譬四識住;水界者,譬貪喜四取攀緣識住」,明確界定四識住為識所依止之四境——色、受、想、行——而貪喜潤澤則為令識增長之助緣。此處「四取攀緣識住」之詞,凸顯四識住非僅靜態住處,而是與「取」相應之攀緣所依。

二、四識住之具體相貌。經文明列:「於色中識住,攀緣色,喜貪潤澤,生長增廣;於受、想、行中識住,攀緣受、想、行,貪喜潤澤,生長增廣。」 措辭略異,稱「色識住,色攀緣、色愛樂、增進廣大生長」,「色識住」以「識」置於所依之後,與「色中識住」之語序微別。又此處特出「於色意生縛」之詞——意指對四識住所生之繫縛,非僅外境之執,乃意根之繫著。

三、斷四識住之次第。本經詳述離貪之次第:於色界離貪已,「於色封滯意生縛斷」 或「於色意生縛斷」;縛斷已,攀緣斷;攀緣斷已,識無住處、不復生長增廣。不生長故不作行,住已知足,知足已解脫,自覺涅槃:「我生已盡,梵行已立,所作已作,自知不受後有。」此中「封滯」一詞為 獨有, 則無此二字,可見同經內部譯語之微差。

四、城喻別釋四識住。此段以「四交道頭」之城為喻:四城門為「四識住」,四守門者為「四念處」,城主為「識受陰」,使者為「止、觀」。此喻將四識住配於「四門」,強調其為識出入所依之門戶,與前段「地界」之依止義及「意生縛」之繫著義形成另一側面——四識住乃識往來之通道,非僅一境。

術語記要:本經對「四識住」之指稱甚為統一,唯 偶用「色識住」之簡稱;輔助術語則有「四取攀緣識住」「意生縛」「封滯」「色封滯意生縛」等,皆於本經中具體出現,可作為歸一條目下之本經譯名標記。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《寶積部·大寶積經》(唐菩提流志譯)論「四識住」時,先直接標舉其名相與結構,再以「識」與「智」的對比反覆展開其義涵。

經中明言:「有四識住識,依此住故名識住。何者為四?所謂色識住、受識住、想識住、行識住。」 四者分別以色、受、想、行四蘊為所依,「識緣於色、識住色中,由如此故生喜住著,轉加增長堅固廣大」,餘三亦復如是。此即四識住之核心結構。值得注意的是,本經只列色受想行四蘊為識之所住,不以識蘊為所住——識本身即是能住者,非所住。

在術語上,本經另以「色趣識所依止、受趣識所依止、想趣識所依止、行趣識所依止」來表述四識住,「趣」即趣向、所依之義。四識住被定性為「識」而非「智」:「如是識住,是名為識不應依趣」,意謂菩薩依般若波羅蜜多修行時應依趣於智而不應依趣此識。

本經最突出的特色是大量以「識/智」對舉來辨別凡聖染淨。三個層次反覆出現:

第一層,於五蘊辨:「識」者住於五受蘊中,「智」者不住五受蘊而能了達識蘊;同段亦以「五取蘊」一詞並用,二者同指五蘊,僅取名角度略異。

第二層,於四大辨:「識」者能了別地水火風界;「智」者不住四大界而能善通達識之法性。本經更進一步云:「若有說言四種識住識不安住,此則名為識之法性。若於法性不雜亂智,是名為智則可依趣」,將「不住四識住」安立為智之所行。

第三層,於六塵辨:「識」者能了別眼所識色乃至意所識法;「智者於內寂靜、不行於外,唯依於智,不於一法而生分別及種種分別」。

另有一段雖未正面提出「四識住」之名,卻從另一側面談識:識能知善與不善業並隨業而行,捨身時作「名此念識」之念;並以取色、欲取、見取、戒取四取配合地水火風四大論身之成壞。其云「所有知者,彼名聲香味觸等界;所念知者,故名為識」,以「所知」屬前五境、以「所念知」屬於識,再次強調識之能緣能了別之義,與四識住之結構可相映照。

綜合而言,本經論四識住的核心表述為:識依色、受、想、行四蘊而住,由緣著而生喜住著、增長堅固。其獨特側面在於反覆以「識」與「智」對比,將四識住定性為應離、應不依趣之識,而以不住四蘊、不雜亂之智為所應依趣;又以「五受蘊」「五取蘊」「色趣識所依止」等異名同義之詞並陳,凸顯其術語形式的多樣性。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》以頌標舉云:「四識住當知,四蘊唯自地,說獨識非住,有漏四句攝。」 隨即以長行釋義。

論中所引契經原文為「識隨色住,識隨受住,識隨想住,識隨行住,是名四種」。 論釋此四之體性,謂「隨次第有漏四蘊」,明四識住即色、受、想、行四蘊——而非識蘊——所攝;且此四唯於自地,識不於異地之色等蘊中依著。

論中以多重譬喻辨「識非識住」之理。其一以能所分別為喻:「由離能住立所住故。非能住識可名所住,如非即王可名王座」,王與座不可等同,故獨識非識住。 其二以田種為喻:「此四識住猶如良田,總說一切有取諸識猶如種子,不可種子立為良田。」 由此可知:四識住為田,有取之識為種子,體性各別,不可互易。又如人船之理,法與識俱時生者可立為識之良田,識蘊自身不能作田,故非識住。

論中進一步辨析四識住與七識住之攝屬關係,明示二者「非遍相攝」,於是施設四句分別:第一句——七攝非四攝,謂七中識;第二句——四攝非七攝,謂諸惡處、第四靜慮及有頂中除識餘蘊;第三句——四攝七攝,謂七中四蘊;第四句——俱非,謂除前三相之類。

論復指明,契經乃以密意言說,諸如別經所說「置地界中」即是別名說四識住,「有取識」即五種子之異名。阿毘達磨依法相說,故以「置地界中」表田、「有取識」喻種,分別其體;此乃經論說法層次之不同,非相違也。

於五蘊次第建立之因緣中,論亦引田種之喻:「此即識住,識住其中顯似世間田種次第,是故諸蘊次第如是。」 蓋色如器、受類飲食、想同助味、行似廚人、識喻食者,識依四蘊而住,如種子依田。五蘊之次第即隨此染污、田喻、麁細等因緣而立。

綜上,本論以「識住」一語貫攝全文,兼用「能住」、「所住」、「依著」、「乘御」、「有取識」剖析其義;以「有漏四蘊」定其體,以「自地」限定其分限;以「非即王可名王座」、「良田與種子」二喻破「識為識住」之執;並以四句門攝辨其與七識住之寬陿相攝關係。所用語如「蘊」、「界」、「地」、「有漏」,皆承毘曇部阿毘達磨之慣用語法。

Related