Dharma · AI Companion

受想行識

vedanā-saṃjñā-saṃskāra-vijñāna

受想行識是指五陰(蘊)中除色之外的四種精神要素,即領納、想像、造作與識別作用。

A Contemporary Reading

Whenever we attempt to understand our inner world, we often hit a wall of overwhelming complexity. We feel a tangled mess of emotions, thoughts, urges, and awareness, and we call this entire tangled ball "Me." In Buddhist psychology, the Buddha offered a masterclass in deconstructing this mental knot. He divided the totality of our existence into Five Aggregates (五蘊 / *wǔ yùn*), also known as the Five Skandhas (五陰 / *wǔ yīn*). The first is Form (色 / *sè*), representing the physical world and our material bodies. The remaining four—受想行識 (Feeling, Perception, Volitional Formations, and Consciousness)—encompass the entirety of our mental life.

Understanding these four mental factors is not an exercise in philosophical trivia; it is the very engine of the Buddhist path to liberation (解脫道). To see how these gears turn is to see the machinery of our suffering, and ultimately, how to dismantle it.

Here is a deep dive into the four mental aggregates, written for the contemporary mind.

***

### 這個概念在说什么 (What This Concept is Saying)

In the classical texts, *Shou, Xiang, Xing*, and *Shi* are not vague ideas; they are precise, mechanical definitions of how the mind processes reality in real-time. They arise dependently based on "contact" (觸) and "name-and-form" (名色). Let's define their boundaries strictly according to the sutras:

1. **受 (Feeling / *vedanā*): Defined by the characteristic of "experiencing" (諸覺相). This is not a complex emotion like jealousy or nostalgia. It is the immediate, raw hedonic tone of an experience: pleasant (樂), unpleasant (苦), or neutral (不苦不樂). It arises at the six sense doors (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, mind). 2. 想 (Perception / *saṃjñā*): Defined by the characteristic of "recognizing or grasping marks" (諸想). This is the cognitive function of pattern recognition. It takes the raw data and slaps a label on it: "red," "square," "loud," "my boss's voice." It is not deep philosophical pondering; it is the instantaneous tagging system of the mind. 3. 行 (Volitional Formations / *saṃskāra*): Defined by the characteristic of "constructing or willing" (為作相). This is the realm of intention, urges, and willpower (六思身). It is the psychological reaction to the feeling and perception. It is the karma-generating engine that says, "I want this," "I hate this," or "I must react to this." 4. 識 (Consciousness / *vijñāna*):** Defined by the characteristic of "distinguishing or bare cognizing" (別知相). This is the baseline awareness that an object is present at a sense door. Eye-consciousness simply knows visual data is there; ear-consciousness knows sound is there. It is the background screen upon which the other three play out.

To prevent us from solidifying these processes into a permanent "Self" (我), the Buddha used highly specific, 1:1 metaphors to describe the Five Aggregates. You cannot mash them into one general analogy; each reveals a specific type of emptiness: * 色如聚沫 (Form is like a mass of foam): The physical body is just an accumulation of fragile elements. * 受如水泡 (Feeling is like a water bubble): Sensation arises from the contact of raindrops on a puddle—popping into and out of existence instantly. * 想如野馬/春時焰 (Perception is like a spring mirage): Like shimmering heat on a highway, our recognition tricks us into seeing an oasis (a solid, meaningful object) where there is only vibrating air. * 行如芭蕉 (Volitional formations are like a plantain tree): If you peel a plantain tree trunk layer by layer looking for solid wood, you find nothing. Our "will" and intentions have no solid, enduring core. * 識如幻 (Consciousness is like a magical illusion): It acts as a conjurer, deceiving us into believing there is a unified, continuous "watcher" behind our eyes.

In the path of liberation, a practitioner observes these four mental factors to realize the Three Marks of Existence: they are impermanent (無常), they lead to suffering if clung to (苦), and they are not-self (非我). By realizing this, the 16 subtle views of self (e.g., "I am my feelings," "My feelings are inside me") are shattered.

***

### 生活里的走查 (A Walkthrough in Life)

Let’s map this strictly to a contemporary scenario to see the machinery in action.

Imagine you are commuting home after a long day. You casually pull out your phone and see a Slack notification from your manager: *"Can we talk about your project output tomorrow?"*

Here is how the four mental aggregates fire, in milliseconds:

1. 識 (Consciousness): Your eyes contact the glowing screen. Eye-consciousness ignites. There is simply the bare awareness of visual data—shapes and light. 2. 想 (Perception): Almost instantly, the mind’s pattern-recognition software kicks in. You group the pixels into letters, the letters into words. You recognize the sender’s avatar. You pull from your memory bank and label the message: *"Work. Manager. Questioning my output."* * *Common mistake:* People think *Xiang* is the subsequent anxiety. No, *Xiang* is just the cold, rapid identification of the threat. It’s the mirage taking shape. 3. 受 (Feeling): Based on that contact and recognition, a raw sensation arises. Your stomach drops; your chest tightens. This is unpleasant feeling (苦受). * *Common mistake:* We usually say, "I am angry/scared." But at the level of *Shou*, there is no "I" yet. There is only a popping water bubble of unpleasant physical/mental sensation. 4. 行 (Volitional Formations): Now, the will and urges react to the unpleasant feeling. You feel an urge to defend yourself. You mentally draft a passive-aggressive reply. You feel a surge of resistance: "I don't want to deal with this." This is the karma-producing volition (思). * *Common mistake:* We think *Xing* (action/formation) means typing out the reply. No, *Xing* is the *internal mental urge and intention* shaping your psyche long before your thumbs move.

Throughout this entire cascade, Consciousness (識) continues to illuminate the inner drama, creating a feedback loop. Because we are untrained, we look at this rapid, mechanical sequence and declare: *"I am stressed. This is my life. I am under attack."* We are eaten alive (所食) by our own mental aggregates.

***

### 当代人为什么需要它 (Why Modern People Need It)

Contemporary society suffers from a profound over-identification with the mind. We are taught that "you are what you think" and that our feelings are our deepest, most authentic truth. When anxiety or depression hits, it feels like a monolithic, suffocating block.

The teaching of *Shou, Xiang, Xing, Shi* acts as a cognitive scalpel. It offers us a way to slice the overwhelming monolith of "My Suffering" into bite-sized, mechanical, and highly transient components. You learn to observe: *"Ah, there is a tightness in the chest (Feeling). There is the memory of a past failure (Perception). There is the urge to run away (Volition). And there is the awareness of all this (Consciousness)."* When dismantled this way, the "Self" that is supposedly suffering cannot be found.

We can see fascinating parallels in contemporary neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and AI algorithms. Predictive processing theories suggest our brains don't passively see the world; they actively construct reality by matching sensory inputs to past models (perfectly mirroring *Xiang* / Perception). Algorithms build profiles of us based on our micro-reactions and clicks (mirroring the karma of *Xing* / Volition).

However, we must be careful not to equate the two. Science seeks to map the brain to optimize it or cure clinical pathologies. The Buddha’s mapping of the four mental aggregates aims at total, existential liberation. Neuroscience tells you *how* the mirage works; the Dharma teaches you how to stop dying of thirst while chasing it.

***

### 常见误读与澄清 (Common Misreadings and Clarifications)

To truly grasp this concept, we must clear away several modern dilutions:

1. "Shou (受) means my emotions." *Clarification:* *Shou* is strictly the baseline hedonic tone—pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral. Complex emotions like "nostalgia" or "existential dread" are actually a rapid, messy combination of *Shou* (the pain/pleasure), *Xiang* (the memory/labels), and *Xing* (the narrative/reaction).

2. "Xiang (想) means my thoughts and imagination." *Clarification:* The Chinese character "想" usually means "to think," which misleads modern readers. In the sutras, *Xiang* (*saṃjñā*) is recognition, perception, and conceptual labeling. It is the act of distinguishing "this is a table" from "this is a chair."

3. "Xing (行) means my physical actions." *Clarification:* *Xing* refers to mental formations, specifically volition or intention (*cetanā* / 思). It is the psychological drive and habit-energy. It happens entirely in the mind. Physical action is merely the trailing shadow of *Xing*.

4. "To be liberated, I must destroy my feelings, thoughts, and consciousness." *Clarification:* This is the most dangerous misunderstanding. We often think spiritual progress means becoming a numb, unfeeling zombie. The Mahayana teachings (such as the *Prajnaparamita* and *Maharatnakuta* sutras) explicitly clarify this: the nature of *Shou, Xiang, Xing, Shi* is ultimately empty (畢竟淨). They are like illusions. Because they lack inherent, solid existence, there is nothing to destroy.

As the classical texts state beautifully: "In the true dharma of renunciation, feeling, perception, volition, and consciousness are neither severed nor removed" (真實出家法中,受想行識不斷亦不除).

We do not annihilate the mind; we simply stop being fooled by the magician's trick. We experience the bubbles, mirages, and illusions, but we no longer grasp at them as "Me" or "Mine." This is the space where true wisdom and peace are finally found.

Canonical Entry

### 一、定義與核心要義 受想行識(vedanā-saṃjñā-saṃskāra-vijñāna)是指五陰(或稱五蘊)中除「色」之外的四種精神性要素,分別代表領納(受)、想像(想)、造作(行)與識別(識)四種心智活動[chunk:5020, chunk:5082]。在佛教經典中,這四者被視為構成有情生命精神世界的核心成分。其核心要義在於揭示精神現象的無常、苦、空與非我本質,引導修行者破除對自我的執著,從而達到解脫[chunk:5082, chunk:11467, chunk:16332]。 ### 二、主要闡述 1. 四種精神要素的特徵與定義 根據經典論述,受、想、行、識各有其獨特的特徵與表現形式: - :以「諸覺相」為特徵,即能覺知苦、樂、不苦不樂等感受[chunk:5082]。在具體表現上為「六受身」,即眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意觸生受[chunk:5066, chunk:5123]。 - :以「諸想」為特徵,包括少想、多想、無量想、都無所有作無所有想等認知活動[chunk:5082]。具體表現為「六想身」,即眼觸至意觸所生之想[chunk:5066, chunk:5123]。 - :以「為作相」為特徵,即在色、受、想、行、識中起造作、意志作用[chunk:5082]。具體表現為「六思身」(或稱六思),即眼觸至意觸所生之思,或色思、聲思、香思、味思、所觸思、法思[chunk:5067, chunk:5123, chunk:15303]。 - :以「別知相」為特徵,即能識別色、聲、香、味、觸、法等境界[chunk:5082]。具體表現為「六識身」,即眼識至意識身[chunk:5067, chunk:5123, chunk:15303]。 2. 因緣生滅與生命流轉 受想行識並非孤立存在,而是依因緣而生滅。五受陰皆以「欲」為根、為集、為生、為觸[chunk:5115]。其中,「受、想、行」以「觸」為因緣,觸集則受、想、行集,觸滅則受、想、行滅[chunk:5066, chunk:5067, chunk:5071, chunk:5116, chunk:5119];而「識」則是以「名色」為因緣,名色集則識集,名色滅則識滅[chunk:5067, chunk:5071, chunk:5116, chunk:5119]。 在生命流轉與投生過程中,受想行識扮演著關鍵角色。外道對於「受想行識來入母腹」的機制無法了知,佛陀指出此法甚深寂滅,非思量境界[chunk:17912]。在捨身之際,「識」體雖然無色,但以取色等為因[chunk:19195];臨終時,形骸與識及諸入界分散,識作為所依,會執持「法界受」、法界念及善惡業,遷往中陰並受後報[chunk:19198]。 3. 觀照修行與解脫路徑 為了斷除愛欲與我慢,經典提出了多種針對受想行識的觀照方法: - 三法印與非我觀:修行者應以平等慧如實觀察,無論過去、未來、現在,內外、麁細、好醜、遠近的受想行識,皆是「非我、不異我、不相在」[chunk:5020, chunk:5021],其本質皆是「無常、苦、變易之法」[chunk:5082, chunk:5123, chunk:5127, chunk:16332]。剖析十六種微細我見(即我、異我、我中、中我)[chunk:5344]。 - 五種如實知與所食觀:須對受想行識進行「五種如實知」,即如實知其自體、集、味、患、離[chunk:5066, chunk:5067, chunk:5116]。同時,應觀照自己現在、過去、未來正被受想行識所吞噬(所食),如此便能不顧過去、不著未來,向於當下滅盡[chunk:5082]。在禪修中,若未能直接捨念樂住,則應觀受想行識「如病、如癰、如刺、如殺」以離貪[chunk:7965]。 - 般若空性與無所得:大乘般若教法強調受想行識本性即空,其自相即是空,與「無生」無二無別[chunk:11467, chunk:12554, chunk:13257, chunk:13261, chunk:15635]。其體性如夢、如響、如影、如幻、如聚沫,非曾有、非當有、非今有[chunk:12989, chunk:14140, chunk:18003],因其無數、無量、無邊[chunk:14691],呈現「無縛無脫」的狀態[chunk:12989, chunk:16245]。菩薩修行時應「不行受想行識」[chunk:12554, chunk:14137]、「不念受想行識」[chunk:14140],不執著其常無常、苦樂等[chunk:12086, chunk:12554, chunk:14137],因其「畢竟不可得」[chunk:12086, chunk:13254, chunk:14460]。菩薩不為受想行識而行般若,亦不在有所得中分別受想行識[chunk:15637]。 - 畢竟清淨與不斷不除:受想行識不生不滅、不垢不淨,即是其「畢竟淨」[chunk:14097, chunk:14098, chunk:14142]。在真實出家法中,「受想行識不斷亦不除」,因為心本無生、不可得發,無須在外相上作斷除之想[chunk:19001]。 ### 三、不同部類與譯本的表述差異 在不同部類與經典中,對於受想行識的稱呼與表述存在顯著差異: 1. 陰與蘊的稱呼:《雜阿含經》(阿含部)在術語使用上,一律以「五陰」或「五受陰」來稱呼,並將除「色」之外的四種精神性要素統稱為「受、想、行、識」[chunk:5020, chunk:5066, chunk:5082, chunk:5115]。而《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》(般若部)與《大寶積經》(寶積部)則多使用「五蘊」或直接將「受想行識」作為一個整體的精神性範疇與「色」並置[chunk:11467, chunk:16332]。 2. 以「識」概括四陰:《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》在具體論述空性或不二時,有時會以「識」來代表或概括受想行識這四者,如「空即是識」[chunk:11467]、「受想行識不二是非識」[chunk:13314]。 3. 「名」與「行」的定義分歧:在定義「名色」之「名」時,《大寶積經》將其具體化為「受、想、思、觸、作意」五種要素[chunk:15303];而《雜阿含經》則將「行」定義為「六思身」[chunk:5067, chunk:5123],並在《大寶積經》中同樣將「行」定義為六思(色思至法思)[chunk:15303]。 ### 四、與相關概念的關係 1. 與「色」的關係:受想行識作為精神性要素,與物質性的「色」共同構成有情生命的整體(五陰/五蘊)[chunk:5066, chunk:5115, chunk:16332]。 2. 與「觸」及「名色」的關係:受、想、行是以「觸」為因緣,而識則是以「名色」為因緣,彼此互為依存,因緣和合而生[chunk:5116]。 3. 與「我見」及「我慢」的關係:凡夫因愚癡會對受想行識產生「即我」(如受即是我)、「異我」(如受異我)、「我中」(如我中受)、「受中我」(如受中我)等十六種微細我見[chunk:5116, chunk:5127, chunk:5344]。聖弟子則通過觀照其非我、不異我、不相在而斷除我執[chunk:5020, chunk:5021]。 4. 與「如來」及「解脫」的關係:如來非由受想行識所表示,亦非以受想行識的盡滅而得解脫[chunk:11555]。佛陀宣說甚深般若,並非為了讓眾生執取(受)或斷滅(捨)受想行識,而是為了破除將其執為「我、我所」的顛倒妄想[chunk:14525, chunk:16377]。 ### 五、代表性原文引用 1. 《雜阿含經》:「諸覺相是受受陰……諸想是想受陰……為作相是行受陰……別知相是識受陰。」[chunk:5082] 2. 《雜阿含經》:「觸集則受、想、行集,觸滅則受、想、行滅……名色集則識集,名色滅則識滅。」[chunk:5066, chunk:5067] 3. 《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》:「受想行識即是空,空即是識……離空無識、離識無空。」[chunk:11467, chunk:12554] 4. 《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》:「受想行識不生不滅、不垢不淨,是名受想行識清淨。」[chunk:14142] 5. 《大寶積經》:「受想行識,非曾有、非當有、非今有。」[chunk:18003] 6. 《大寶積經》:「真實出家法中,受想行識不斷亦不除。」[chunk:19001]

By Sutra

T0099 · 阿含部

在《T0099》中,對「受、想、行、識」這四種精神性要素進行了系統且深入的論述。 一、 術語特徵與定義 本經在術語使用上,一律以「五陰」或「五受陰」來稱呼「五蘊」[chunk:5066, chunk:5115],並將除「色」之外的四種精神性要素統稱為「受、想、行、識」[chunk:5020, chunk:5082]。經中對這四者的特徵與定義進行了明確的界定: 1. 受(受受陰):以「諸覺相」為特徵,即能覺知苦、樂、不苦不樂 [chunk:5082]。具體表現為「六受身」,即眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意觸生受 [chunk:5066, chunk:5123]。 2. 想(想受陰):以「諸想」為特徵,包括少想、多想、無量想、都無所有作無所有想 [chunk:5082]。具體表現為「六想身」,即眼觸至意觸所生之想 [chunk:5066, chunk:5123]。 3. 行(行受陰):以「為作相」為特徵,即在色、受、想、行、識中起造作作用 [chunk:5082]。具體表現為「六思身」,即眼觸至意觸所生之思 [chunk:5067, chunk:5123]。 4. 識(識受陰):以「別知相」為特徵,即能識別色、聲、香、味、觸、法等境界 [chunk:5082]。具體表現為「六識身」,即眼識至意識身 [chunk:5067, chunk:5123]。 二、 因緣與集滅關係 本經強調「受、想、行、識」並非孤立存在,而是依因緣而生滅: 1. 因緣根源:五受陰皆以「欲」為根、為集、為生、為觸 [chunk:5115]。 2. 觸與名色:其中,「受、想、行」是以「觸」為因緣 [chunk:5116],因此「觸集」則受、想、行集,「觸滅」則受、想、行滅 [chunk:5066, chunk:5067, chunk:5071, chunk:5119]。而「識」則是以「名色」為因緣 [chunk:5116],因此「名色集」則識集,「名色滅」則識滅 [chunk:5067, chunk:5071, chunk:5119]。 三、 關於「我見」與「我慢」的剖析 凡夫因愚癡無聞,會對「受、想、行、識」產生「我」的執著(我見與我慢)[chunk:5116, chunk:5127]。本經詳細剖析了針對這四種精神要素所產生的微細我見,每陰各有四種表現形式(合為十六種我見)[chunk:5344]: 1. 即我:如認為「受即是我」(我是受)[chunk:5344]。 2. 異我:如認為「受異我」,即執著色或想、行、識是我,而受是我所擁有 [chunk:5344]。 3. 我中:如認為「我中受」,即執著色等是我,而受在其中 [chunk:5344]。 4. 受中我:如認為「受中我」,即執著色等是我,在受中住並周遍四體 [chunk:5344]。 對想、行、識三陰亦有同樣的「即我、異我、我中、中我」的微細執著剖析 [chunk:5344]。 四、 觀照方法與修行解脫 為了斷除愛欲與我慢,本經提出了多種針對「受、想、行、識」的觀照方法: 1. 三法印與非我觀:應當以平等慧如實觀察,無論過去、未來、現在,內外、麁細、好醜、遠近的「受、想、行、識」,皆是「非我、不異我、不相在」[chunk:5020, chunk:5021],且本質皆是「無常、苦、變易之法」[chunk:5082, chunk:5123, chunk:5127]。 2. 五種如實知:修行者須對受、想、行、識進行「五種如實知」,即如實知其自體、集(來源)、味(喜樂因緣)、患(無常苦變易之患)、離(調伏斷越欲貪)[chunk:5066, chunk:5067, chunk:5116]。 3. 「所食」之觀:觀照自己現在正被現在的「受、想、行、識」所吞噬(所食),過去也曾被其吞噬;若樂著未來,未來亦將被其吞噬。如此觀照便能不顧過去、不著未來,向於當下滅盡 [chunk:5082]。 4. 如病如刺之觀:在禪修(如第三禪)中,若未能直接捨念樂住,則應觀「受、想、行、識」法「如病、如癰、如刺、如殺」,以此離貪並向於解脫 [chunk:7965]。 通過上述對「受、想、行、識」的如實知見,修行者能斷除愛欲、超越疑心、斷除三結(身見、戒取、疑),從而證得須陀洹果乃至究竟苦邊、心得解脫 [chunk:5020, chunk:5021, chunk:5067, chunk:5123]。

T0223 · 般若部

在《T0223》(《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》)中,“受想行識”作為五蘊中除色蘊之外的四種精神性要素,是般若空性論述的核心對象。本經通過與“色”並列,反復闡明“受想行識”的空性、不可得性以及在菩薩修行中應有的觀照方式。其論述要點如下: 一、 受想行識與空性、無生的不二關係 本經指出,受想行識本性即空。“受想行識即是空,空即是識”[chunk:11467],“受想行識空為非識,離空無識、離識無空”[chunk:12554]。這種空性意味著受想行識與“無生”(畢竟不生)無二無別[chunk:13261],其自相即是空[chunk:13257, chunk:15635]。因此,受想行識在法性中並無分別,其本身即是法性[chunk:16306],其“如”(真如)與如來之“如”亦是一如、無二無別[chunk:14526]。 二、 無縛無脫與如幻的本質 經中強調,受想行識本無所有,故“無縛無脫”[chunk:12989, chunk:16245]。無論是過去、未來、現在,還是善、不善、無記,受想行識皆因“無所有、離、寂滅、不生”而呈現無縛無脫的狀態[chunk:12989]。本經常用夢、響、影、幻、焰、化等比喻來形容受想行識的非真實性[chunk:12989, chunk:14140],並指出其“前際、後際、中際皆不可得”[chunk:13463, chunk:13464],因而是無數、無量、無邊的[chunk:14691]。 三、 菩薩修行中的“不行”、“不念”與“無所得” 在修行實踐上,本經提出菩薩行般若波羅蜜時,應當“不行受想行識”[chunk:12554, chunk:14137]。這意味著不執著於受想行識的常與無常、苦與樂、我與無我、淨與不淨[chunk:12086, chunk:12554, chunk:14137]。菩薩應當“不念色、不念是色...受想行識亦如是”[chunk:14140],即不產生關於受想行識的憶想與執著。因為受想行識“畢竟不可得”[chunk:12086, chunk:13254, chunk:14460],所以般若波羅蜜亦被稱為“無名波羅蜜”[chunk:14181]。菩薩不為受想行識而行般若,亦不在有所得中分別受想行識[chunk:15637]。 四、 畢竟清淨與不可思議 受想行識的自性空即是其“畢竟淨”[chunk:14097, chunk:14098]。經中指出,“受想行識不生不滅、不垢不淨,是名受想行識清淨”[chunk:14142],且其清淨與般若波羅蜜的清淨、我淨、眾生淨無二無別[chunk:14053, chunk:14097]。此外,受想行識被描述為“不可思議、不可稱、無有量、無等等”[chunk:14332]。佛陀宣說甚深般若,並非為了讓眾生“受”(執取)或“捨”(斷滅)受想行識,而是為了破除眾生將受想行識執為“我、我所”的顛倒妄想[chunk:14525, chunk:16377]。 在術語使用上,本經始終將“受想行識”作為一個整體的精神性範疇與“色”並置,有時在具體論述空性或不二時,會以“識”來代表或概括這四者(如“空即是識”[chunk:11467]、“受想行識不二是非識”[chunk:13314])。

T0310 · 寶積部

在《T0310》中,五蘊中除色蘊之外的四種精神性要素被統稱為「受想行識」。本經對此概念進行了多維度的深入論述: 首先,在修行解脫的層面上,本經強調「受想行識」的無常、苦與非我本質。經中指出,受想行識皆是「無常」與「苦」,屬於「變壞法」。多聞聖弟子不應計執受等是我、我有受等、受等屬我或我在受等中。無論是過去、未來、現在,內外、麁細、勝劣、遠近的受想行識,皆非是我。以此正念正慧審觀察,能使弟子對受想行識產生「厭患」,進而「不染著」並獲得「解脫」[chunk:16332]。 其次,從大乘空義與法性來看,受想行識的體性是超越三世與虛妄不實的。經中以多種譬喻(如鏡中像、響聲、陽焰、聚沫、夢境)來闡明,受想行識的體性「非曾有、非當有、非今有」,本無堅實自性 [chunk:18003]。文殊師利菩薩更進一步指出,在真實的出家法中,「受想行識不斷亦不除」,因為心本無生、不可得發,無須在外相上作斷除之想 [chunk:19001]。此外,如來亦非由受想行識所表示,亦非以受想行識的盡滅而得解脫,展現了如來超過諸表示法的甚深境界 [chunk:11555]。 再者,本經對受、想、行、識的具體內涵與運作進行了微觀的定義與剖析: 1. 在「名色」的定義中,將「名」具體化為「受、想、思、觸、作意」五種要素 [chunk:15303]。 2. 將「行」定義為六思,即「色思、聲思、香思、味思、所觸思、法思」 [chunk:15303]。 3. 將「識」定義為六識,即「眼識、耳識、鼻識、舌識、身識、意識」 [chunk:15303]。 最後,關於生命流轉與投生,本經探討了受想行識在入胎與捨身時的作用。外道對於「受想行識來入母腹」的機制無法了知,佛陀指出此法甚深寂滅、非思量境界 [chunk:17912]。在捨身之際,「識」體雖無色,但以取色等為因 [chunk:19195];臨終時,形骸與識及諸入界分散,識作為所依,會執持「法界受」、法界念及善惡業,遷往中陰並受後報 [chunk:19198]。

Related