Dharma · AI Companion

vijñāna

识指对色声香味触法等境界的了别作用,是因缘所生、无常非我的五蕴之一与生命流转核心。

A Contemporary Reading

Here is a deep, accessible exploration of the Buddhist concept of consciousness, tailored for a contemporary reader.

***

In the Buddhist path of liberation, if we view our suffering and existential wandering as a grand, intricate mechanism, then (*vijñāna*, consciousness) is the central processor. It is the fifth and final of the Five Aggregates (五蕴, *pañca-skandha*), the ultimate boss in our illusion of a solid "self," and the vehicle of our continuous journey through life and death.

To understand *vijñāna* is to finally see the wizard behind the curtain of our daily experience.

### 这个概念在说什么

In the classical texts, the core definition of *識* (*vijñāna*) is crystal clear: 了别 (vivid discernment or cognition).

The sutras state, "Because it discerns, it is called consciousness" (识识是故说识). What does it discern? It discerns the six domains of reality (六尘, *ṣaḍ-viṣaya*): visual forms, sounds, smells, tastes, tactile sensations, and mental phenomena. It does this via the six sensory faculties, giving rise to the Six Consciousnesses (六识, *ṣaḍ-vijñāna*)—eye-consciousness, ear-consciousness, up to mind-consciousness. Think of it as the spotlight of awareness that illuminates an object on the stage of your mind.

However, the Buddha was extremely strict about what this consciousness is *not*. It is not a permanent, unchanging soul. In the *Madhyama Āgama* (中阿含经), a monk named Sāti held the view that "this very same consciousness wanders through cyclic existence unchanged." The Buddha fiercely rebuked him, explaining that consciousness strictly arises from conditions (因缘故起). Just as fire is named by its fuel—a wood fire, a grass fire—consciousness is named by its conditions: eye and form give rise to eye-consciousness. "When there are conditions, it arises; when there are no conditions, it ceases" (有缘则生,无缘则灭).

To explain the Five Aggregates, the early teachings use a precise, strictly mapped set of metaphors. They do not blur them together into one vague poetic image. The sutras state: * *Form* (色) is like foam on a river (色如聚沫) — porous and easily broken. * *Sensation* (受) is like a water bubble (受如水泡) — popping in an instant. * *Perception* (想) is like a mirage/wild horse (想如野馬) — a trick of the heat creating false images. * *Volition* (行) is like a banana tree trunk (行如芭蕉) — peel away its layers, and there is no solid core inside. * **And *Consciousness* (識) is like an illusion/magic trick (識如幻).**

A magician’s trick feels entirely real to the audience, yet it is "nothing there, not firm, not real, not solid" (无所有、无牢、无实、无有坚固). Consciousness tricks us into believing there is a unified, continuous "I" experiencing the world. In reality, it changes incredibly fast—the sutras compare it to a monkey swinging through a forest, letting go of one branch to immediately grasp another (如猕猴在林间放一取一).

Furthermore, consciousness cannot exist in a vacuum. The teachings describe the Four Stations of Consciousness (四识住). *Vijñāna* must land on the "soil" of the other four aggregates (Form, Sensation, Perception, Volition). Watered by the moisture of craving and joy (贪喜为水界), it takes root, climbs, and proliferates.

In the grand scheme of birth and death, this consciousness intertwines with Name-and-Form (名色, *nāma-rūpa*, the psychophysical complex) like sheaves of reeds leaning against each other in an empty field (三芦立于空地,展转相依). Pull one away, and the other falls. At death, it acts as the "Spiritual Consciousness" (神识) or "Karma-beckoned Consciousness" (业招识). Like a "Consciousness King" (识王) abandoning a ruined city, the final consciousness of this life perishes, and conditioned by past karma, a birth-moment consciousness (生分识) arises in the next—a fluid process with "nowhere it comes from, and nowhere it goes" (无所从来,亦无所至), transferring like fragrance on the wind.

### 生活里的走查

Let’s walk this concept through a very familiar contemporary scenario: scrolling through short videos on your phone late at night.

1. The Trigger (因缘故起): The glowing pixels of the screen meet your eye. Bam. Eye-consciousness (眼识) arises. It purely *discerns* the visual data. 2. The Landing (四识住): This consciousness doesn't just float; it immediately lands on the other aggregates. It lands on *Form* (the physical sensation of the phone), it experiences a *Sensation* (a quick hit of pleasure/amusement), it triggers *Perception* (recognizing "Oh, a funny cat!"), and ignites *Volition* (the physical and mental urge to swipe to the next video). 3. The Watering (贪喜润泽): Because you crave dopamine, this craving acts as water. Your consciousness takes root here, clinging and proliferating. 4. The Monkey Mind (如猕猴在林间放一取一): Notice how fast it shifts. In one second, your eye-consciousness is on the cat. The next second, a notification pops up, and your mind-consciousness jumps to work anxiety. Then a food ad appears, and it jumps to hunger. Your consciousness is swinging from branch to branch, arising and perishing in milliseconds.

The common mapping error we make here: Most of us feel deeply that there is a static, unified "Me"—a continuous observer sitting comfortably inside our heads, looking out through our eyes like windows, consuming the TikTok feed. Buddhism maps this differently, and fiercely points out the error: There is no "continuous observer." There is only the *illusion (幻)* of an observer created by millions of discrete moments of *discernment (了别)* flashing on and off at lightning speed, conditioned by the changing videos. Believing in this inner homunculus is what binds us to suffering.

### 当代人为什么需要它

We are living in an era defined by the "Attention Economy." Never before in human history has our *vijñāna* been so aggressively hunted, harvested, and monetized. Algorithms are essentially highly optimized condition-generators, designed specifically to capture our consciousness, force it to land in the "Four Stations" of our emotions and impulses, and water it heavily with craving (fear, outrage, desire).

Contemporary people are exhausted because we allow our "Consciousness King" to be dragged behind the chariot of endless external stimuli.

Understanding *識* offers a profound psychological rescue. When we observe that consciousness is just an arising phenomenon—a magic trick (*识如幻*)—we can stop taking its contents so seriously. The Buddhist path urges us to shift from relying on consciousness to relying on wisdom: 依趣于智不依趣识 (Rely on wisdom, not on consciousness).

Consciousness grasps, divides, and gets stuck (住与分别). Wisdom (智, *jñāna*), however, observes the aggregates without attaching (无取无执). We can draw a loose analogy to Artificial Intelligence: AI functions remarkably like *vijñāna*—it takes inputs, discerns patterns, and categorizes (了别) with blinding speed based on conditioned data. But AI has no *wisdom*; it cannot see the emptiness of its own processing. While science and algorithms deal in the mechanics of processing, Buddhism offers the liberation *from* compulsive processing. By observing our consciousness with wisdom, we slowly starve it of craving. Eventually, like the liberated sages of old, our mind "does not dwell" (不住识神), finding true peace and Nirvana.

### 常见误读与澄清

* Misinterpretation 1: "Consciousness" (识) is just the Buddhist word for a permanent "Soul" (灵魂). * Clarification: This is the exact error the Buddha scolded the monk Sāti for. An eternal soul implies something that packs its bags and moves intact from body to body. *Vijñāna* is an ever-flowing stream of cause and effect. The sutras explicitly state that at death, the "final consciousness" (最后识) extinguishes, and conditioned by karma, a *new* "birth-moment consciousness" (生分识) arises. It is like lighting a new candle with the flame of a dying one; the flame is neither exactly the same, nor entirely different. It is a process of conditioning, not an immortal entity. * Misinterpretation 2: We can achieve a state where our Consciousness exists purely on its own, floating free of the body and mind in this life. * Clarification: The Buddha called this a foolish delusion. Consciousness and Name-and-Form (the body/mind complex) are entirely interdependent (展转相依), like bundled reeds. Without Form, Sensation, Perception, and Volition acting as its station (四识住), consciousness cannot grow or sustain itself in samsaric existence. * Misinterpretation 3: Liberation means destroying all consciousness and becoming a numb rock. * Clarification: The goal is not brain death. The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (大宝积经) reminds us that "consciousness and wisdom are not apart, working in harmony" (识智不相离,和合我常说). You still see, hear, and interact with the world. However, the *thirst, clinging, and grasping* that usually fuel consciousness are cut off. The magic trick is seen through. You can enjoy the magic show of reality with perfect clarity, without ever being fooled into thinking it is real.

Canonical Entry

一、 定义与核心要义 在佛教经典中,“识”(vijñāna)的核心定义在于“了别”与“识别”。如《中阿含经》所载,“识识是故说识”,即识的作用在于识别、了别色、声、香、味、触、法等诸尘境界[chunk:4849]。《大宝积经》亦指出,识能了别地、水、火、风四大界及眼所知色乃至意所知法等六尘境界[chunk:15458, chunk:16114]。识并非孤立、常恒的实体,而是随因缘而生灭、无常非我的有为法。 二、 主要阐述 1. 因缘生灭与无常非我:经典极力破除将“识”视为常恒不变之轮回主体的邪见。如《中阿含经》中,佛陀严厉呵斥了𠻬帝比丘认为“今此识,往生不更异”的恶见,明确指出“今此识,因缘故起……有缘则生,无缘则灭”[chunk:4711, chunk:4712]。识随所缘而生并依之得名,如眼色共生眼识,意法共生意识,犹如火随所烧之物而得名[chunk:4712, chunk:4713]。在《中阿含经》与《杂阿含经》中,识被描述为无常、苦、变易、生灭与坏法[chunk:2847, chunk:2859, chunk:4971, chunk:5092, chunk:5095],其转变极其迅速,“日夜时刻,须臾转变,异生、异灭”,犹如猕猴在林间放一取一[chunk:5833]。经中以“幻”来譬喻识,指出其“无所有、无牢、无实、无有坚固”[chunk:5731, chunk:5732]。若对过去、未来、现在的识产生乐著、欲、住,即是念过去、愿未来、受现在法[chunk:4307, chunk:4317];若不离对识的染、欲、爱、渴,执著“识即是我,识是我有”,当识发生变易时,就会产生恐怖、烦劳,反之若离识染则不受恐怖[chunk:4269]。因此,圣弟子不应在识中见我、异我或相在[chunk:5037, chunk:5117]。 2. 四识住与攀缘机制:识的生长与增广必须依赖于其他因缘。《杂阿含经》与《大宝积经》均详细阐述了“四识住”的心理机制。识不能孤立存在,必须以色、受、想、行这四受阴(或五受蕴中的前四蕴)为驻留的温床(地界),以贪喜为润泽(水界),在其中攀缘、爱乐,方能生长增广[chunk:5062, chunk:5135, chunk:15458, chunk:16114]。若企图脱离色、受、想、行而宣称识有来、去、住、生,纯属虚妄[chunk:5062, chunk:5135]。 3. 神识的去来与生死流转:在生命流转与投生机制中,“识”扮演着关键角色。《中阿含经》指出,若识不入母胎,名色便不能成此身[chunk:3409]。而在《大宝积经》中,这一过程被更详细地描述为“神识”的运作:受胎时,识被称为“业招识”,入胎后如药草依大地般渐得增长[chunk:17914];临终时,前生的“最后识”灭,因过去业力,在生分之中“初识”或“生分识”初起,相续不断,此去来过程“无所从来,亦无所至”[chunk:17954, chunk:17959, chunk:17973]。神识无形无质,死时舍身不从咽喉或诸孔出,亦不破坏身体,犹如香气移徙,唯取法界与善恶业力随业受报[chunk:19190, chunk:19191, chunk:19192, chunk:19196, chunk:19198]。经中将识喻为“识王”住于“身城”,身坏时识王便弃城而走,别住他国[chunk:19530]。 4. 修行观照与断除解脱:修行者应当对识进行如实观察,了知识的集、灭、味、患、离[chunk:5070, chunk:5073]。通过对识生厌、离欲、断除欲贪,使识无所住、不复增长,便能心得解脱、自觉涅槃[chunk:4973, chunk:5062, chunk:5135]。对于长夜修善的凡夫,命终时其“神识上昇”向安乐处[chunk:8074];而对于彻底漏尽解脱的圣者,其命终时“不住识神”,恶魔波旬即使在尸体周匝黑闇烟起中四处寻觅其“识神”当生何处,也终不可得[chunk:10678, chunk:10679, chunk:16702]。 三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异 1. 五蕴的称呼:《中阿含经》常称五蕴为“阴”(如“色阴”、“识阴”)[chunk:3916],或直接并列为“觉、想、行、识”[chunk:2845](其中“觉”对应“受”);《杂阿含经》则使用“五受阴”或“五阴”[chunk:5105, chunk:5127];而《大宝积经》中,“五受蕴”[chunk:15458]、“五取蕴”[chunk:16114]与“阴”[chunk:18996, chunk:19188, chunk:19193]等词交替出现。 2. 识的分类与特称:《中阿含经》将识分为眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意“六识”[chunk:2629],并提到在特定解脱状态下,心不染五界而解脱者,唯有“余识”(乐识、苦识、喜识、忧识、捨识)[chunk:4242];《杂阿含经》则称之为“六识身”[chunk:5067, chunk:5071];《大宝积经》除了“六识”[chunk:15303]外,还广泛使用“神识”[chunk:19187, chunk:19188]、“业招识”[chunk:17914]、“最后识”[chunk:17954]、“生分识”[chunk:17954]、“受生分识”[chunk:17959]、“识王”[chunk:19530]等特有称呼。 3. 其他术语差异:对于“触”,《中阿含经》译为“更乐”[chunk:3409, chunk:4242];对于执著于识的动作,《中阿含经》称为“识捫摸识”[chunk:4269]。对于生命流转的主体,《杂阿含经》使用了“神识”[chunk:8074]与“识神”[chunk:10678, chunk:16702]等词。 四、 与相关概念的关系 1. 识与名色:两者具有展转相依、共俱不离的关系。《中阿含经》指出“因行便有识”[chunk:2629],“因识便有名色”[chunk:2628, chunk:3409],“缘名色有识”[chunk:3409]。在十二因缘中,行灭则识灭,识灭则名色灭[chunk:4715, chunk:4717, chunk:4718]。《杂阿含经》亦指出“齐识而还,不能过彼”,名色的集与灭决定了识的集与灭[chunk:5071, chunk:5825, chunk:5842],并以“三芦立于空地,展转相依”来生动比喻两者的互依性[chunk:5829]。《大宝积经》则概括为“识若是有有假名色,识若是无无假名色”[chunk:15303]。 2. 识与智慧:两者既有联系又有区别。《中阿含经》指出“智慧及识”二法“合不别”,因为“智慧所知,即是识所识”,但功能上“知者我以智慧知”[chunk:4850]。《大宝积经》强调菩萨修行应“依趣于智不依趣识”[chunk:16114, chunk:16115],因为识住于四识住并生分别,而智则不住五受蕴、无取无执、不生分别[chunk:15458, chunk:15459, chunk:16114, chunk:16115];但同时指出“识智不相离,和合我常说”,两者和合能产生增上作用[chunk:19531, chunk:19532]。 3. 识与寿、暖:《中阿含经》指出,识是维持肉体生命的关键要素,身死是因为失去了“寿、暖、识”三法;而在灭尽定中,虽想及知灭,但“寿不灭讫,暖亦不去”,诸根不坏,故与死有别[chunk:4853]。 4. 心、意、识:《杂阿含经》常将“心、意、识”三者并提,用以描述众生日常心识的流转与转变[chunk:5053, chunk:5833, chunk:11229]。 五、 代表性原文引用 1. 《中阿含经》:“识识是故说识。识何等?识色,识声、香、味、触、法。”[chunk:4849] 2. 《中阿含经》:“今此识,因缘故起……有缘则生,无缘则灭。”[chunk:4711, chunk:4712] 3. 《杂阿含经》:“譬如三芦立于空地,展转相依,而得竪立。若去其一,二亦不立。”[chunk:5829] 4. 《杂阿含经》:“攀缘色、受、想、行,在其中攀缘、爱乐,方能生长增广。”[chunk:5062, chunk:5135] 5. 《大宝积经》:“识若是有有假名色,识若是无无假名色。”[chunk:15303] 6. 《大宝积经》:“前识灭而生分识生,相续不断……无所从来,亦无所至。”[chunk:17954, chunk:17973]

By Sutra

T0026 · 阿含部

《T0026》中对“识”的论述极为丰富,主要围绕识的定义、分类、因缘生灭性、在缘起中的核心作用、无常非我的特质,以及它与智慧、生命维持的关系展开。 一、 识的定义与基本分类 经中通过尊者大拘絺罗之口对“识”进行了直白的定义:“识识是故说识”,即识的作用在于识别、了别,具体表现为“识色,识声、香、味、触、法”[chunk:4849]。在分类上,经中将“识”主要分为六识,即眼识、耳识、鼻识、舌识、身识、意识[chunk:2629]。此外,经中还提到在特定解脱状态下,心不染五界而解脱者,唯有“余识”,即:乐识、苦识、喜识、忧识、捨识[chunk:4242]。 二、 识的因缘生灭性(破除常恒之见) 针对𠻬帝比丘生起的恶见——认为“今此识,往生不更异”(即认为识是常恒不变、在轮回中流转并承受报应的实体)[chunk:4711, chunk:4712],佛陀予以严厉呵斥。佛陀与诸比丘共同阐明:“今此识,因缘故起……有缘则生,无缘则灭”[chunk:4711, chunk:4712]。经中强调,识是随所缘而生,并依所缘得名的。如缘眼与色生识,称为眼识;缘意与法生识,称为意识。这犹如火随所烧之物而得名(如缘木生火称为木火,缘草粪生火称为草粪火)[chunk:4712, chunk:4713]。 三、 识与名色的互依关系及缘起流转 经中详细论述了识与名色互为因缘、共俱不离的关系。一方面,“因行便有识”[chunk:2629],“因识便有名色”[chunk:2628, chunk:3409];另一方面,“缘名色有识”[chunk:3409]。这种互依性在生命投生与维持中至关重要:若识不入母胎,名色便不能成此身;若识入胎即出,名色便不会和合;若识初断坏,名色便不能增长。反之,若识不得、不立、不依于名色,则识也不会有生、老、病、死、苦。因此,识与名色是“共俱”的[chunk:3409]。在十二因缘的顺逆观中,行灭则识灭,识灭则名色灭[chunk:4715, chunk:4717, chunk:4718]。 四、 识的无常、苦、非我特质与修行观照 作为五阴(五蕴)之一,经中常以“识阴”或“觉、想、行、识”并提[chunk:2845, chunk:3916]。经中强调,没有任何识是常住不变、一向乐、恒久存的[chunk:2845],识是无常、苦、变易之法[chunk:2847, chunk:2859]。因此,多闻圣弟子应当以慧观如实知:“识非是我,我无有识”(或“识非是我,识非我有”)[chunk:3916, chunk:4269]。若对过去、未来、现在的识产生乐著、欲、住,即是念过去、愿未来、受现在法[chunk:4307, chunk:4317]。若不离对识的染、欲、爱、渴,执著“识即是我,识是我有”,当识发生变易时,就会产生恐怖、烦劳[chunk:4269]。反之,若离识染,则不受恐怖[chunk:4269]。 五、 识与其他法(智慧、寿暖)的关系 1. 智慧与识:经中指出“智慧及识”二法“合不别”,不可别设施。因为“智慧所知,即是识所识”[chunk:4850]。但二者亦有功能上的侧重,如“知者我以智慧知”[chunk:4850]。 2. 寿、暖、识:识是维持肉体生命的关键要素之一。身死弃于塚间,是因为失去了“寿、暖、识”这三法[chunk:4853]。在灭尽定中,虽然想及知灭,但“寿不灭讫,暖亦不去”,诸根不败坏,这与死有别[chunk:4853]。 六、 独特用词与术语形式 在这部经中,五蕴常被称为“阴”(如“色阴”、“识阴”)[chunk:3916]或直接并列为“觉、想、行、识”[chunk:2845](其中“觉”对应“受”,“想”对应“想”,“行”对应“行”,“识”对应“识”)。此外,触被称为“更乐”[chunk:3409, chunk:4242];执著于识的动作被称为“识捫摸识”[chunk:4269]。

T0099 · 阿含部

在《T0099》经中,“识”是佛教核心修行与缘起理论的关键概念。该经对“识”的论述呈现出系统而独特的面貌: 一、 术语形式与用词特点 该经在翻译上具有鲜明的时代特征。经中将“识”作为“五受阴”(或“五阴”)之一进行论述,而非后世常见的“五蕴”[chunk:5105, 5127]。在分类上,经中定义了“六识身”,即眼识、耳识、鼻识、舌识、身识和意识身[chunk:5067, 5071]。此外,经中常将“心、意、识”三者并提[chunk:5053, 5833, 11229],并在论及众生生命流转与解脱归宿时,使用了“神识”[chunk:8074]与“识神”[chunk:10678, 16702]等特定术语。 二、 识的本质:无常、苦、非我与如幻 经中强调,识是无常、苦、变易、生灭与坏法[chunk:4971, 5092, 5095]。识的转变极其迅速,“日夜时刻,须臾转变,异生、异灭”,犹如猕猴在林间放一取一[chunk:5833]。经中以“幻”来譬喻识,指出谛观思惟识时,会发现其“无所有、无牢、无实、无有坚固”,本质上“如病、如癰、如刺、如杀”[chunk:5731, 5732]。因此,圣弟子不应在识中见我、异我或相在[chunk:5037, 5117]。 三、 四识住与攀缘机制 经中详细阐述了“四识住”的心理机制。识不能孤立存在,必须以色、受、想、行这四受阴为驻留的温床(譬喻为“地界”),以贪喜为润泽(譬喻为“水界”),在其中攀缘、爱乐,方能生长增广[chunk:5062, 5135]。若企图脱离色、受、想、行而宣称识有来、去、住、生,则纯属无意义的虚妄“言数”,因为那超出了识的实际境界[chunk:5062, 5135]。 四、 识与名色的展转相依 在缘起链条中,经中指出“齐识而还,不能过彼”,即识与名色互为因缘[chunk:5825]。二者的关系被生动地比喻为“三芦立于空地,展转相依,而得竪立”,若去其一,余二亦不立[chunk:5829]。具体而言,名色的集与灭,直接决定了识的集与灭[chunk:5071, 5842]。 五、 识的断除、解脱与“不住识神” 修行者应当对识进行如实观察,了知识的集、灭、味、患、离[chunk:5070, 5073]。通过对识生厌、离欲、断除欲贪,使识无所住、不复增长,便能心得解脱、自觉涅槃[chunk:4973, 5062, 5135]。对于长夜修善的凡夫,命终时其“神识上昇”向安乐处[chunk:8074];而对于彻底漏尽解脱的圣者,其命终时“不住识神”,恶魔波旬即使在尸体周匝黑闇烟起中四处寻觅其“识神”当生何处,也终不可得[chunk:10678, 10679, 16702]。

T0310 · 寶積部

在《T0310》(大宝积经)中,对“识”这一概念进行了极为详尽且多角度的论述,涵盖了识的定义、识与智的辨析、神识在生死流转中的去来机制,以及丰富的譬喻。 一、 识的定义与基本特征 经中指出,识是名色的重要组成部分,“识若是有有假名色,识若是无无假名色”[chunk:15303]。识的具体分类为眼识、耳识、鼻识、舌识、身识、意识[chunk:15303]。其核心作用在于“了别”,即能了别地、水、火、风四大界,以及眼所知色乃至意所知法等六尘境界[chunk:15458, chunk:16114]。识的产生依赖于因缘,即“从境界生”、“从作意生”、“从分别生”[chunk:15459, chunk:16115]。在性质上,识属于有为法,在无为法中不能行,且具有“有生有灭有住”的生灭特征[chunk:15459, chunk:16115]。 二、 识与智的辨析(依智不依识) 经中强调菩萨修行应“依趣于智不依趣识”[chunk:16114, chunk:16115]。两者的区别在于: 1. 住与不住:识依止于色、受、想、行“四识住”中,因缘于此而生喜乐著,转加增长[chunk:15458, chunk:16114];而智则“不住五受蕴中、了达识蕴”[chunk:15458, chunk:16114]。 2. 分别与无分别:识对六尘生起种种分别,而智则“于内寂静不行于外”,不于一法生分别[chunk:15458, chunk:16114],具有“无取无执、无有所缘、无所了别”的特征[chunk:15459, chunk:16115]。 3. 有为与无为:识住于有为生灭,而智则能了达无为、不生不灭[chunk:15459, chunk:16115]。 然而,识与智并非完全割裂,经中亦指出“识智不相离,和合我常说”[chunk:19532]。识能分别,智能了知,两者和合方能产生增上作用[chunk:19531]。经中以“车”为喻,说明身车由诸界和合,而“由识能牵挽”[chunk:19532]。 三、 神识的去来与生死流转机制 本经的一大独特侧面是详细阐释了“神识”在生死投胎中的运作: 1. 受胎与增长:在受胎时,识被称为“业招识”,以母腹为依处,入胎后如药草依大地般渐得增长[chunk:17914]。 2. 临终与受生:临终时,前生的“最后识”灭,因过去所造业力,在生分之中“初识”或“生分识”初起,前识灭而生分识生,相续不断[chunk:17954, chunk:17959, chunk:17973]。此去来过程“无所从来,亦无所至”[chunk:17954, chunk:17973]。 3. 无形与转移:神识无形无质,在体内无固定倚住之处[chunk:19192]。死时神识舍身,不从咽喉或诸孔出[chunk:19190],亦不破坏卵壳(如鸡卵),犹如香气移徙[chunk:19191]。识舍身时唯取法界与善恶业力,随业受报[chunk:19196, chunk:19198]。 4. 识王与身城:经中将识喻为“识王”住于“身城”,当无常军来袭、身城灭坏时,识王便弃城而走,别住他国(即转世)[chunk:19530]。 四、 识的譬喻与术语特色 经中使用了大量生动的譬喻来描绘识的自性与作用。如将识蕴喻为“幻事”,本无我及有情[chunk:16103];将识的无形任持大身喻为“风大”[chunk:19188, chunk:19202];将识自作自受喻为“蚕虫出丝作茧自缠”[chunk:19194];将识的坚固与身体的危脆对比喻为“如意宝”与虚假资具[chunk:19205]。 在术语上,本经除了使用“识”外,还广泛使用“神识”[chunk:19187, chunk:19188]、“业招识”[chunk:17914]、“最后识”[chunk:17954]、“生分识”[chunk:17954]、“受生分识”[chunk:17959]、“识王”[chunk:19530]等特有称呼。此外,在指代五蕴时,经中的“五受蕴”[chunk:15458]、“五取蕴”[chunk:16114]与“阴”[chunk:18996, chunk:19188, chunk:19193]等词交替出现。

Related