Dharma · AI Companion

俱解脫

ubhayatobhāga-vimukta

定慧俱足而得解脱的圣者。AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In the liberating path of the Dharma, 俱解脫 (ubhayatobhāga-vimukta, "liberation in both ways") represents an extremely rare and supremely complete state of liberation. In a single sentence: it is an arhat who simultaneously possesses both the meditative realization of the eight liberations through direct bodily witness and the wisdom of completely extinguishing all outflows — with concentration and wisdom both perfected, the mind well liberated.

To understand 俱解脫, one must first clarify the word 「俱」 ("both") — it refers to the absolute co-presence and perfection of two powers: 定 (samādhi, meditative concentration) and 慧 (prajñā, wisdom).

In the early scriptures, 阿羅漢 (arhat, "worthy one") — sages who have completely eradicated all defilements and transcended the cycle of birth and death — are not of a single type. Based on each practitioner's relative achievement on the axes of meditative concentration and wisdom, the scriptures make an extremely rigorous classification of sages. And 俱解脫 stands at the very summit.

To explain this concept with precision, we must dismantle its two core supporting pillars:

1. The Concentration Side: The Eight Liberations and "Bodily Witness"

The criterion for a both-sided liberator on the side of concentration is attaining 「身作證成就遊」 (also rendered 「身觸成就遊」 or 「身作證具足住」, "dwelling in the attainment of bodily witness") with respect to the 八解脫 (aṣṭa-vimokṣa, the eight liberations). The 「八解脫」 is a sequence of extremely profound meditative attainments and mental-spiritual transformation: * First Liberation (色觀色, "perceiving forms, contemplating forms"): With perceptions of material form within the mind, one contemplates external forms (such as contemplating corpses or impurity), thereby overcoming attachment to material things. * Second Liberation (內無色想外觀色, "internally without perceptions of form, contemplating forms externally"): Internally free of perceptions of form, pure and unobstructed, yet still contemplating external forms to further consolidate transcendence of the material world. * Third Liberation (淨解脫身作證成就遊, "the pure liberation, dwelling in bodily witness"): Focusing on pure, beautiful light or colors (e.g., the pure vision), reaching the ultimate of concentration, experiencing in body and mind an extreme purity and detachment from defilement. * Fourth Liberation (無量空處, the sphere of infinite space): Transcending all material form and entering the boundless, vast samādhi of infinite space. * Fifth Liberation (無量識處, the sphere of infinite consciousness): Abandoning the concept of space, turning instead to the infinitely expanding awareness and consciousness itself. * Sixth Liberation (無所有處, the sphere of nothingness): Transcending the expansion of consciousness, entering the supremely tranquil concentration of "nothing whatsoever" where neither consciousness nor its objects have any basis. * Seventh Liberation (非有想非無想處, the sphere of neither perception nor non-perception): Entering the highest mundane meditational state, where mental and physical activities are extremely subtle, seemingly present yet absent. * Eighth Liberation (想知滅解脫 / 滅盡定, the liberation of the cessation of perception and feeling / the attainment of cessation): Completely extinguishing all coarse and subtle mental activities, feelings (受, vedanā) and perceptions (想, saṃjñā), reaching ultimate stillness.

What requires special clarification is the meaning of 「身作證」 (kāya-sākṣin, "bodily witness"; also rendered 身觸, "bodily contact"): The 「身」 ("body") here by no means refers only to this physical body composed of the four great elements, but rather to the practitioner's wholehearted, personally experienced, extremely concrete bodily-and-mental realization — personally penetrating and undergoing the entire sequence from the first concentration to the eighth cessation attainment. This is an experience that penetrates to the very bone and marrow — by no means a matter of imagination or logical inference.

2. The Wisdom Side: Seeing with Wisdom that All Outflows Are Exhausted

Mere possession of the eight liberations in concentration, without wisdom, amounts at best to extremely deep mundane meditative concentration (e.g., the 身證 "bodily witness" practitioner, who can enter the eight liberations but has not yet seen the exhaustion of outflows and still needs to 行无放逸, "practice without negligence," in continued cultivation). A both-sided liberator must simultaneously possess the ultimate vision of wisdom — correctly contemplating that the five aggregates 色、受、想、行、識 (rūpa, vedanā, saṃjñā, saṃskāra, vijñāna — form, feeling, perception, volition, consciousness) are all impermanent, suffering, empty, and without self, thereby completely uprooting all craving and attachment to the world, reaching the state of 「慧觀諸漏盡知」 ("seeing with wisdom that all outflows are exhausted"; also known as 「知見有漏斷」, "knowledge and vision whereby the defiled outflows are cut off").

3. The Extremely Precise "Threefold Classification of Sages"

To guard against posterity blurring concepts, the scriptures (e.g., 《中阿含經》 *Madhyama-āgama*, 《雜阿含經》 *Saṃyukta-āgama*) establish a strict coordinate system, dividing sages who possess either deep concentration or high wisdom into three classes: * 慧解脫阿羅漢 (prajñā-vimukta arhat, "wisdom-liberated arhat"): Wisdom perfected, defilements completely exhausted (有漏斷知), but unable to fully attain the eight liberations through 「身作證」 (unable to enter the attainment of cessation). * 身證聖者 (kāya-sākṣin sage, "bodily-witness sage"): Able to fully attain the eight liberations through 「身作證」, even entering the attainment of cessation, but wisdom not yet completely perfected and defilements not yet exhausted (still requiring 行无放逸). * 俱解脫阿羅漢 (ubhayatobhāga-vimukta arhat, "both-sided liberated arhat"): Simultaneously possessing both the bodily witness of the eight liberations and the wisdom that exhausts all outflows.

In a gathering of five hundred arhats in the Buddha's time, the proportions of these three categories are clearly recorded: 「九十比丘得三明,九十比丘得俱解脫,餘者慧解脫」 ("Ninety monks attained the three knowledges, ninety monks attained both-sided liberation, the rest attained wisdom liberation"). This shows that even among already-liberated sages, the both-sided liberator is extremely rare — an exceptionally eminent master of both concentration and wisdom. Because they can never again produce defilements, the Buddha explicitly stated that for both-sided liberators there is no need to proclaim 行无放逸 — for it is absolutely impossible for them to act negligently again.


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

To prevent 「俱解脫」 from becoming a vague mythological term, we can use the most familiar life scenarios of contemporary people, tracing along the operations of the 五陰 (pañcaskandha, the five aggregates) — 「色、受、想、行、識」 — and of 「定、慧」 (concentration and wisdom), and conduct an extremely rigorous practical walkthrough.

Scenario: Late-Night Overtime and Rage at Being Rejected

Suppose you work at a high-pressure internet company. At 2 a.m., the project proposal you revised seven times gets torn apart by your manager in a group chat, with your competence questioned.

1. Common Misprojections and the Entangled State: * 色蘊 (rūpa-skandha, the form aggregate — matter and body): By no means just "your physical body." It includes your racing heartbeat, rising blood pressure, tightening stomach, as well as the glowing text on the phone screen, the cold office environment in the dead of night (all forms composed of the four great elements and what is derived from them). * 受蘊 (vedanā-skandha, the feeling aggregate — receiving and experiencing): The moment you see the group message, the extreme physical discomfort and psychological suffering (pain, humiliation, agitation) that arise. * 想蘊 (saṃjñā-skandha, the perception aggregate — grasping marks and labeling): Not vaguely "thoughts," but "grasping marks and labeling." Your brain rapidly captures "the manager's name," "the critical words," and immediately applies labels — "He's targeting me," "This is an insult to me." * 行蘊 (saṃskāra-skandha, the volition aggregate — mental formation): Not external actions, but the inner motivations and volitional drives. The impulse to fight back surging wildly in your heart, the intention to quit and throw things, or the impulse to sink into self-doubt. * 識蘊 (vijñāna-skandha, the consciousness aggregate — discriminative awareness): Integrating the above form, feeling, perception, and volition into a unified conscious experience — "I am being harmed, I am furious."

2. The Ordinary Person's Quagmire and "Pseudo-Liberation": * 凡夫 (pṛthagjana, the ordinary person): Enslaved by the mark-grasping of the perception aggregate, lashing out under the drive of the volition aggregate, breaking down at 3 a.m., thoroughly kidnapped by the five aggregates. * Pseudo-"concentration" practitioner (contemporary escapism): Attempting to numb oneself by scrolling short videos, drinking, or forcibly suppressing emotions and "sitting in meditation to calm down." This is only temporary anesthesia; it does not cut off the root of affliction. * Pseudo-"wisdom" practitioner (contemporary cognitive therapy / intellectualization): Muttering "it's just work, not worth getting angry about," understanding many principles intellectually, yet when the next message comes a second later, the body (form aggregate) and emotions (feeling aggregate) still churn violently. This is what is called 「理通文脊,遇境依然迷」 ("the principle flows through the text, yet face-to-face with a situation one is still lost").

3. Mapping and Contrast with 「俱解脫」: If we map the state of a both-sided liberator onto a contemporary scene: * On the wisdom side (the foundation of wisdom-liberation): When an extremely adverse circumstance (form aggregate) and painful feeling (feeling aggregate) strike, his wisdom pierces through in an instant like a sharp sword: all the stimuli before his eyes, the physiological reactions in his body, the conceptual labels in his brain (perception aggregate), the volitional tendencies in his heart (volition aggregate) — all are phenomena of instantaneous arising and ceasing, impermanent, selfless, flowing and changing. There is no fixed "I" being insulted, nor a fixed "manager" inflicting harm. Craving and aversion are completely evaporated at the very moment of their sprouting. 「諸漏盡知」 ("all outflows are known to be exhausted") — not a grain of afflictive poison remains. * On the concentration side (the ultimate of bodily witness): Not only does he see through selflessness intellectually, his mind possesses an extremely formidable freedom of control. If he so wishes, he can in an instant withdraw his consciousness completely from the extremely chaotic material realm (the realm of form, the formless realm), traveling freely through the sphere of infinite space, the sphere of infinite consciousness, and even entering the 「想知滅解脫」 (the liberation of the cessation of perception and feeling, the attainment of cessation) where feeling and perception are completely extinguished. In his eyes, the clamor and pressure of the world are nothing but a wisp of dust drifting through empty space.

Through this walkthrough, the point where most people misproject becomes clear: Never mistake 「俱解脫」 for a "psychotherapist skilled in meditation techniques," and never think that "understanding the principle of no-self" is both-sided liberation. The former has only shallow concentration; the latter has only weak dry wisdom (乾智慧, intellectual understanding not nourished by deep meditative absorption).


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary life is an era of being intensely kidnapped by "algorithms and anxiety." In contemporary experience, we can readily find reference points to contrast with 「俱解脫」 — for example, AI and brain science.

1. Breaking Through the Contemporary "One-Dimensional Predicament"

Contemporary people easily fall into two extremes: * Extreme one (technological coldness / extreme rationality): Like a rational algorithm, mastering all worldly logic and knowledge (resembling only a certain arid cognition), yet utterly lacking deep settling of body-mind experience; at the first major setback, body and mind collapse completely. * Extreme two (experiential escapism / meditation fervor): Contemporary culture is full of Soundbaths, mindfulness-based stress reduction, and deep meditation. Many people indulge in the brief calm brought by meditation (resembling shallow experiences of concentration), yet once they return to complex real-world relationships, afflictions and attachments remain exactly as before.

The concept of 「俱解脫」 sets an extraordinarily lofty benchmark for contemporary people: true freedom of body and mind can be achieved neither by cold intellectual analysis nor by numbed experiential avoidance. It demands that we achieve a perfect unity between extremely deep mastery of body and mind (concentration) and extremely acute penetration of truth (wisdom).

2. Comparison and Limitations with Contemporary Science (Brain Science / AI)

Contemporary brain science, through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) research, has found that long-term meditators show significantly reduced activity in the brain's default mode network (DMN), and markedly reduced amygdala activation related to depression and anxiety; artificial intelligence (AI), meanwhile, demonstrates pure logical processing and information analysis capabilities that surpass human beings.

However, scientific analogy is by no means equivalent to Buddhist truth, and its limitations are extremely obvious: * Limitations of brain science: Brain science can currently only observe changes in neuronal electrical signals and blood oxygen concentration (at the level of material form, the form aggregate) during meditation or emotional shifts. As for the 「無量識處」 (sphere of infinite consciousness), 「無所有處」 (sphere of nothingness), and even the 「滅盡定」 (attainment of cessation) in which perception and feeling are completely extinguished — brain science can neither fully define them with physical instrumental metrics, nor explain the radical subjective liberation of "completely extinguishing all ignorance and defiled outflows." Brain science can record a "calm brain," but cannot manufacture "a sage in whom hatred never arises." * Limitations of AI: AI possesses powerful data retrieval and logical reasoning, appearing to possess a very high-dimensional "wisdom." But AI has no "feeling (受蘊)" or "subjective awareness (識蘊)" at all, let alone "bodily witnessing" its way through the suffering and impermanence of life. AI's freedom from affliction is because it has no mind; the both-sided liberator's freedom from affliction is because 心善解脫 ("his mind is well liberated").

Understanding 「俱解脫」 allows contemporary people, while embracing technology and brain science, to clearly recognize that deep within the human mind there remains an extremely vast dimension of liberation that physics has not yet fully covered.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Regarding this advanced concept of 「俱解脫」, contemporary readers and practitioners easily fall into several deep misreadings that must be thoroughly clarified:

Misreading One: Equating 「俱解脫」 with "a master who plays with supernormal powers and can fool people"

Clarification: Although scriptures record that some both-sided liberators possess supernormal powers such as 「他心智」 (paracitta-jñāna, knowledge of others' minds) (e.g., the novice in the 《雜阿含經》 who displayed miraculous transformations and knew the king's mind), supernormal powers are by no means the essence of both-sided liberation. The core definition of both-sided liberation is always two points: bodily witness of the eight liberations and the exhaustion of defiled outflows. The scriptures record numerous wisdom-liberated arhats who likewise lack elaborate supernormal powers, yet like the both-sided liberators, they are the highest sages who have completely exhausted defilements and will not be reborn again. If one pursues exotic abilities apart from "exhausting craving and attachment," one merely falls into the wrong concentration of worldly non-Buddhist paths, entirely unrelated to both-sided liberation.

Misreading Two: Thinking that 「慧解脫」 is inferior to 「俱解脫」, or that "wisdom-liberated ones have not exhausted defilements"

Clarification: This is a severe narrowing of the sages' attainments. On the fundamental goal of liberating from birth and death and eradicating defilements (「漏盡」, āsravakṣaya, exhaustion of outflows), the wisdom-liberated arhat and the both-sided liberated arhat are completely equal. Both have thoroughly "seen with wisdom that all outflows are exhausted," both can never again act negligently, and both have permanently cut off birth and death. The only difference between the two lies in their past karmic connections with meditative concentration and their differing cultivation paths: the both-sided liberator additionally cultivated the extremely deep eight liberations (including the attainment of cessation), while the wisdom-liberated one, relying on basic concentration such as 未到地定 (anāgamya-samādhi, access concentration) or 初禪 (prathama-dhyāna, the first meditative absorption), directly pierced through the five aggregates with extremely acute wisdom to attain liberation.

Misreading Three: Thinking that 「身證」 is a transitional state toward 「俱解脫」, and that sufficiently deep concentration automatically becomes both-sided liberation

Clarification: The scriptures (e.g., the 《中阿含經》) rigorously distinguish 「身證」 from 「俱解脫」. A bodily-witness sage can enter the eight liberations through 「身作證」, and even enter the attainment of cessation, but he has not yet completely exhausted all defiled outflows through wisdom. If a bodily-witness practitioner indulges in the bliss of deep concentration and fails to contemplate and break attachment with the wisdom of the impermanence of the five aggregates, he still cannot become a both-sided liberator, and may even need to be admonished to "practice without negligence" (行无放逸). Concentration itself is merely a tool; only when combined with the contemplative wisdom that completely cuts off ignorance and attachment can deep concentration be transformed into genuine 「俱解脫」.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

「俱解脱」是指在禅定力与智慧力两方面皆获得圆满成就的阿罗汉境界。其核心特征在于「定慧俱圆」:一方面,修行者必须以「身作证」或「身触」的方式,具足成就并游于「八解脱」之中;另一方面,修行者必须以智慧观照,彻底断尽一切烦恼,达到「慧观诸漏尽知」或「以智慧见,有漏断知」的漏尽状态。这种双重成就使其超越了单一侧重禅定或智慧的修行果位,是解脱道中的最高果位之一。

二、 主要阐述

根据《中阿含经》与《杂阿含经》的论述,俱解脱者的修行实践、特质及在僧团中的状态主要表现在以下几个方面:

1. 八解脱的具体内容与身作证: 在修行实践中,俱解脱者能以「顺逆」方向在「八解脱」中「身作证成就游」。八解脱的具体名相包括:第一「色观色」、第二「内无色想外观色」、第三「净解脱身作证成就游」、第四「无量空处成就游」、第五「无量识处成就游」、第六「无所有处成就游」、第七「非有想非无想处成就游」、第八「想知灭解脱身作证成就游,及慧观诸漏尽知」。修行者必须对「七识住」及「二处」如实知之且心无染着,方能圆满此定力。

2. 止观双修与五阴正观: 要达到俱解脱,修行者需经历「止观俱修」的过程。如《杂阿含经》所述,修习「止」能成「观」,修习「观」亦能成「止」,通过止观双修,能证得断界、无欲界、灭界等「诸解脱界」。同时,修行者必须正观「色、受、想、行、识」等五阴皆是无常,由此除灭爱欲,实现「心善解脱」。

3. 修行状态与神变特质: 俱解脱者已彻底完成修行,因此佛陀指出,对于俱解脱比丘,不需再对其宣说「行无放逸」,因为他们已绝不可能再行放逸。此外,俱解脱者对佛陀的教导具有绝对的敬顺心,如佛陀以「汝来入泥」为喻,俱解脱者会立即遵命而绝不避开。在神通方面,部分俱解脱者具足「他心智」等神通,能直接了知他人的心念并示现神变。

4. 在僧团中的比例: 俱解脱在阿罗汉群体中占有特定比例。在佛陀的五百阿罗汉弟子集会中,皆是诸漏已尽、心善解脱的圣者,但其中「九十比丘得三明,九十比丘得俱解脱,余者慧解脱」。这表明在圆满解脱的圣者中,俱解脱者属于定慧双圆的特定群体。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同经典及译本中,对于俱解脱及相关修行要素的术语表述存在细微差异: 1. 阿罗汉的称呼: 《中阿含经》(东晋译本)中常以「阿罗诃」指代阿罗汉;而《杂阿含经》(求那跋陀罗译本)则直接使用「阿罗汉」或「阿罗汉俱解脱」。 2. 身体亲证的表述: 《中阿含经》使用「身作证成就游」或「身触成就游」;《杂阿含经》则表述为「身作证具足住」或「身作证具足」。 3. 物质与精神要素的称呼: 《中阿含经》在论述八解脱时,第四至第七阶段使用「无量空处」、「无量识处」等名相,第八解脱称为「想知灭解脱」;而《杂阿含经》在论及心善解脱的观照对象时,使用「五阴」(色、受、想、行、识)这一术语。 4. 智慧断惑的表述: 《中阿含经》表述为「慧观诸漏尽知」或「已慧见诸漏已尽已知」;《杂阿含经》则表述为「以智慧见,有漏断知」或「知见有漏断」。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 与「慧解脱」的区别: 两者在智慧成就上相同,皆已「慧见诸漏已尽已知」或「知见有漏断」。其区别在于定力成就:俱解脱者能「八解脱身触成就游」或「八解脱具足身作证」;而慧解脱者则是「八解脱身不触成就游」或「不得八解脱身作证具足住」。 2. 与「身证」的区别: 「身证」者在定力上与俱解脱者相似,皆能「八解脱身触成就游」或「八解脱身作证具足住」;但身证者尚未达到智慧的圆满,未能「以慧见诸漏已尽已知」或「不见有漏断」。因此,身证者仍需「行无放逸」以求漏尽,而俱解脱者则不需再行无放逸。 3. 与「见到、信解脱、法行、信行」的关系: 这些果位属于尚未圆满的修行阶段。在定与慧的成就上,皆未达到俱解脱「身证八解脱」与「慧观漏尽」双重圆满的境界。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《中阿含经》卷二十四:「若有比丘彼七识住及二处知如真……于中彼彼身作证成就游,及慧观诸漏尽知,是谓比丘得俱解脱。」 2. 《中阿含经》卷三十一:「云何人俱解脱?多闻圣弟子八解脱身触成就游,以慧见诸漏已尽已知,是谓人俱解脱。」 3. 《杂阿含经》卷三十三:「若复有弟子,八解脱具足身作证,以智慧见,有漏断知,是名阿罗汉俱解脱。」 4. 《杂阿含经》卷四十五:「五百阿罗汉……九十比丘得三明,九十比丘得俱解脱,余者慧解脱。」

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》對「俱解脫」之論述,以八解脫與慧觀漏盡二者之兼具為核心定義。經中佛告阿難:八解脫自「色觀色」之第一解脫起,經內無色想外觀色、淨解脫身作證成就遊,依次度越色想而入無量空處、無量識處、無所有處、非有想非無想處,至第八「想知滅解脫身作證成就遊,及慧觀諸漏盡知」。若比丘於七識住及二處知如真、心不染著得解脫,復於此八解脫「順逆身作證成就遊,亦慧觀諸漏盡者」,即名阿羅訶、名俱解脫。由此可見,本經以「八解脫順逆身作證」與「慧觀諸漏盡」兩條件並舉,定慧俱足方稱俱解脫。

經中復以具體人數呈現俱解脫之定位。尊者舍梨子問佛:五百比丘中幾得三明達、幾得俱解脫、幾得慧解脫?佛答:九十比丘得三明達,九十比丘得俱解脫,餘比丘得慧解脫。此處俱解脫與三明達、慧解脫三者並列,為阿羅漢眾中各自獨立之成就類別,非互相含攝。

於跋陀和利段落中,經文列出七階位之序列:俱解脫、慧解脫、身證、見到、信解脫、法行、信行。佛言:若有比丘俱解脫者,語之「汝來入泥」,彼亦不會住而移避;自慧解脫以下各階位亦復如是。此段以俱解脫居七階之首,明其為最上成就;同時佛問跋陀和利:「汝於爾時得信行、法行、信解脫、見到、身證、慧解脫、俱解脫耶?」答言不得,佛遂呵其「如空屋」,可知此七階乃本經判定修行者證量之完整框架。

關於無放逸之教說,經中明確區分「我說不行無放逸」與「我說行無放逸」二類。俱解脫者,「八解脫身觸成就遊,已慧見諸漏已盡已知」;慧解脫者,「八解脫身不觸成就遊,以慧見諸漏已盡已知」。此二類比丘,佛不更說行無放逸,以其「本已行無放逸,若此賢者本有放逸者,終無是處」。反之,身證者雖八解脫身觸成就遊而「不以慧見諸漏已盡已知」,見到、信解脫、法行、信行各階則唯依決定信佛法眾及慧觀忍而住,此等比丘佛皆為說行無放逸,以其尚有待證之果。

術語方面,本經稱「八解脫」而非「八背捨」;身作證之表述用「身觸成就遊」與「身作證成就遊」二式;慧觀漏盡之表述用「已慧見諸漏已盡已知」及「慧觀諸漏盡知」;最高果位稱「阿羅訶」而非「阿羅漢」;俱解脫之定義句式固定為「八解脫身觸成就遊,已慧見諸漏已盡已知,如是比丘有俱解脫」。此等用詞即本經記錄該概念時之特有術語形式。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「俱解脫」,兼具敘事用例與教理定義兩個層面,術語形式穩定而明確。

一、教理定義:經中以「八解脫具足身作證,以智慧見,有漏斷知」作為俱解脫的完整界定。佛告摩訶男:聖弟子於佛、法、僧一向淨信,於法利智、出智、決定智,「八解脫具足身作證,以智慧見,有漏斷知」,如是聖弟子不趣地獄、畜生、餓鬼,不墮惡趣,「說阿羅漢俱解脫」。此處「俱」之義涵,由經文對舉自明:定學方面須「八解脫具足身作證」,慧學方面須「以智慧見,有漏斷知」,二者兼備方名俱解脫。

二、與慧解脫、身證之對簡:經中緊接俱解脫之後,以「復次」層層遞降,列出二種較低階位。其一,「不得八解脫身作證具足住,然彼知見有漏斷」,名為「慧解脫」——有慧而缺定。其二,「八解脫身作證具足住,而不見有漏斷」,名為「身證」——有定而缺慧。三者並列,俱解脫居首,顯示本經以定慧是否雙具作為判分聖者解脫類別的核心標準。

三、敘事用例與術語形式:經中敘事段落徑稱「俱解脫阿羅漢」。阿育王供養僧眾時,見二沙彌以食團、歡喜丸互相拋擲,笑為小兒戲。上座耶舍告王:「彼二沙彌是俱解脫阿羅漢,更相奉食。」其後二沙彌以他心智知王心念,王乃稽首敬禮。此處「俱解脫阿羅漢」為完整稱謂,表明俱解脫必是阿羅漢,而非有學階位。

四、僧團統計中的分類:佛告舍利弗,五百比丘中「九十比丘得三明,九十比丘得俱解脫,餘者慧解脫」。此處俱解脫與三明、慧解脫三類並舉,以「得俱解脫」為動賓結構,與「得三明」句法一致,視俱解脫為一種所證之德。經又總評此諸比丘「離諸飄轉,無有皮膚,真實堅固」,肯定俱解脫者之究竟穩固。

五、術語特徵:本經一律用「八解脫」而非「八背捨」;用「有漏斷知」「知見有漏斷」表述煩惱永盡,而非「漏盡」之簡說(敘事段則用「諸漏已盡」);「身作證」為本經固定用語,指以身心親證八解脫之定境,非僅知解。全經「俱解脫」一詞凡三見,皆指阿羅漢果位之定慧雙具者,無一處用於有學或外道。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》將「俱解脫」置於學無學位七聖者的分類架構中加以界定。論中先總標七聖者之名:一隨信行、二隨法行、三信解、四見至、五身證、六慧解脫、七俱解脫,並謂「一切聖者皆此中攝」。七者之建立各有依據:初二種依加行異(先時隨他及法修加行),次二種依根不同(鈍利信慧根增),身證依得滅盡定,後二種則依「解脫異」而立——「依唯慧離煩惱障者立慧解脫,依兼得定離解脫障者立俱解脫」。此處術語形式值得注意:本論以「煩惱障」與「解脫障」二障對舉,作為區分慧解脫與俱解脫的判準;慧解脫僅以慧力離煩惱障,俱解脫則兼以定力離解脫障。

頌文以極簡形式給出定義:「俱由得滅定,餘名慧解脫」。所謂「俱」,即兼得滅盡定之義;未得滅定者則但名慧解脫。長行進一步闡釋:「諸阿羅漢得滅定者名俱解脫,由慧定力解脫煩惱解脫障故。所餘未得滅盡定者名慧解脫,但由慧力於煩惱障得解脫故」。由此可知,本論以「是否得滅盡定」為俱解脫與慧解脫的唯一分界,而俱解脫之所以稱「俱」,正在於定(滅盡定)與慧二者俱足,雙離煩惱障與解脫障二障。

此外,論中於七聖者之建立後指出「此名雖七事別唯六」,蓋見道位之隨信行、隨法行至修道位別立信解、見至之名,至無學位復立時解脫、不時解脫之名,名七而體六。俱解脫既屬無學位阿羅漢所攝,其定位即在無學聖者之中。論末又述瑜伽師修解脫等之二緣:一為諸惑已斷更遠,二為於定得勝自在,故能引起無諍等德及聖神通。此雖非專論俱解脫,然「於定得勝自在」一語正與俱解脫「兼得定離解脫障」之義相呼應,顯示本論視定之自在為解脫圓滿不可或缺的面向。

總之,《俱舍論》以阿毘達磨分析法,將俱解脫嚴格界定為無學位阿羅漢中兼得滅盡定、以慧定二力雙離煩惱障與解脫障之聖者,與唯以慧力離煩惱障之慧解脫形成對稱二分。

Related