Dharma · AI Companion

自利

svārtha

自利(svārtha)指修行者自身功德的圆满、烦恼的断除与解脱、清净法身的证得。AI-generated

Type FrameworkDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

无初立层(自利/利他二分是修行取向与目标的伞概念,见地递进框架不覆盖);无究竟指向——大乘了义「自利即利他、自他不二」系对自利/利他二分之消解,非对「自利」一词之当体深化读法,按「消解对待不算再读」不入跨度。〔声闻教:自利即断惑证解脱之正面功德〕〔大乘贬抑二乘语境:「唯求自利」之贬义〕判摄并列不裁决。〔若立「消解亦算究竟收敛」口径,则 究竟第四重〕

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Talking About

In contemporary discourse, "self-interest" often carries a taint of selfishness or moral compromise. In the Buddhist liberation path, however, Self-Benefit (*svārtha*, 自利) is a precise, profound, and indispensably noble concept. At its core, *svārtha* refers to **a practitioner’s fulfillment of their own merit, the complete eradication of afflictions and cognitive barriers, and the ultimate realization of the unhindered, pure Dharma-body (*dharmakāya*, 清淨法身)** [31261].

Rather than a static, monolithic term, the classical canons delineate *svārtha* across four distinct yet interconnected dimensions:

1. The Causal Practice: Inward Gathering and the Perfection of Virtues

At the stage of a practitioner's cause-level training, self-benefit is not passive self-indulgence, but the active accumulation of spiritual resources. * Perfection of the Paramitās: As Nagarjuna’s *Daśabhūmikāvibhāṣā* (十住毘婆沙論) concisely defines: *"Self-benefit means being able to fulfill all Paramitās"* (自利者,能具諸波羅蜜) [36843]. In the division of the Six Paramitās in Asanga’s *Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra* (大乘莊嚴經論), the latter three—Diligence (*vīrya*, 精進), Meditative Concentration (*dhyāna*, 禪定), and Wisdom (*prajñā*, 智慧/解脫)—specifically constitute the domain of self-benefit, while the first three (Generosity, Precepts, Patience) govern the benefit of others [32365, 32366]. * Dynamic Inward 收攝 ("Entering Four Doors"): Vasubandhu’s *Sukhāvatīvyūhopadeśa* (無量壽經優波提舍) uses spatial metaphors of "entering" and "emerging" to structure practice. Self-benefit is characterized as *"entering the four doors"* (入四種門)—an inward gathering of attention, contemplation, and meditative absorption [30654]. Only after this inward mastery can one "emerge from the fifth door" to carry out the outward work of dedicating merit to benefit others (*pariṇāmanā*, 迴向) [30654]. * Deep Dharma Integration: In the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (大寶積經), self-benefit demands that a Bodhisattva diligently cultivate the deepest, most profound teachings without settling for minor achievements or falling into weariness [11563].

2. The Pragmatic Sequence: Knowing One's Capacity

The Buddhist path rejects sentimental heroism. The *Daśabhūmikāvibhāṣā* highlights a fundamental principle of effective action: *"All things first benefit themselves, and only then can they benefit others"* (凡物皆先自利,後能利人 / 若自成己利,乃能利於彼) [36346, 36347]. Abandoning one's spiritual growth prematurely to rush into helping others often results in personal exhaustion, resentment, and failure on both ends [36347]. To evaluate one's limits truthfully—refusing commitments one cannot sustain—is explicitly recognized in the canon as a crucial manifestation of "skillful means" (*upāya-kauśalya*, 善方便) [36492, 36990].

3. Strict Categorization: Pure Self-Interest vs. Co-Benefiting

The *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra* (瑜伽師地論) meticulously draws the boundary between valid spiritual self-benefit and egoic self-absorption: * Pure Self-Interest (純自利 - To Be Abandoned): Seeking wealth and sensory pleasure for oneself, hoarding the Dharma (*dharma-mātsarya*, 悋法), keeping moral precepts merely to buy a comfortable rebirth in heaven, or becoming addicted to deep meditative states (*dhyāna*) while turning a blind eye to suffering beings [28584]. Bodhisattvas are instructed to cut this off entirely [28584]. * Co-Benefiting Self and Others (自利共他 - To Be Practiced): Driven by compassion (*karuṇā*), one practices generosity and patience dedicated to ultimate awakening, cultivating oneself precisely in order to shelter others [28584].

4. The Ultimate Fruit: Buddha-Virtue and Non-Dual Realization

At its ultimate culmination, self-benefit is synonymous with the highest fruit of Buddhahood: * Eradication of Two Barriers: The *Ratnagotravibhāga* (究竟一乘寶性論) defines ultimate self-benefit as gaining liberation from both Afflictive Barriers (*kleśāvaraṇa*, 煩惱障) and Cognitive/Knowledge Barriers (*jñeyāvaraṇa*, 智障), thereby realizing the unhindered Pure Dharma-body [31261]. Within the eight virtues of the Buddha, the first three—Unconditioned Nature (無為體), Natural Self-Existence (自然), and Self-Realization Independent of Others (不依他知)—belong strictly to self-benefit [31056, 31057]. * **The Enjoyment Body (*Sambhogakāya*)**: In the *Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra*, the Buddha’s "Enjoyment Body" is uniquely translated as the *Shíshēn* (食身 - literally "Nourishment/Enjoyment Body"), which represents the ultimate fruition of self-benefit, whereas the Transformation Body (*Nirmāṇakāya*, 化身) serves as the vehicle for benefiting others [32580]. * The Ultimate Identity: As realization deepens, the boundary between self and other dissolves. As the *Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra* states, when a Bodhisattva achieves "equanimity of self and other" (得他自心平等), the distinction vanishes: benefiting another *is* benefiting oneself [31881, 32435]. In the *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra*, the ultimate state of the Tathāgata is described as *"using the benefit of others as His own self-benefit"* (即用利他以為自義) [30489].


Walkthrough in Daily Life

To understand how *svārtha* functions—and where we usually misinterpret it—let us track its mechanics through the ordinary rhythms of contemporary life:

Scenario A: Morning Commute & Smartphone Scrolling

* The Common Mismapping: You spend forty minutes on the subway scrolling through algorithmic feeds, short videos, and outrage news. You tell yourself, *"This is my personal downtime; I am taking care of my mental space."* * The Canonical Walkthrough: Classical Buddhism would categorize this as passive sensory distraction or a mild form of pure self-interest (純自利) [28584]. It leaves the mind fragmented, reactive, and depleted. Genuine self-benefit in this moment would be the practice of "entering the doors" (入四種門)—withdrawing sensory projection, anchoring awareness on the breath, or reflecting on the impermanence of mind-states [30654]. By stabilizing awareness, you build the Paramitās of Concentration and Wisdom [32365, 32366].

Scenario B: The Workplace and the "People-Pleaser" Burnout

* The Common Mismapping: An exhausted team member takes on extra projects for colleagues out of guilt or fear of conflict, believing this self-sacrifice is noble and altruistic. Meanwhile, their physical health deteriorates and bitterness builds up. * The Canonical Walkthrough: The *Daśabhūmikāvibhāṣā* explicitly warns against this: *"If one abandons self-benefit to rush into benefiting others, one will lose the benefit and later suffer regret"* [36347]. Rushing to "save" others when one's spiritual and emotional strength is entirely ungrounded is a mistake. Recognizing one's current capacity, saying an honest "no," and taking time to restore clarity and stability is not selfish—it is the foundational "skillful means" (善方便) of self-benefit required to sustain long-term service [36492, 36990].

Scenario C: Intimate Relationships & Parenting

* The Common Mismapping: A parent demands strict obedience from a child, framing it as *"I am doing everything for your own good,"* while secretly seeking personal anxiety-reduction and control. Alternatively, a partner codependently demands that their lover fulfill all their emotional voids. * The Canonical Walkthrough: This maps onto "Pure Self-Interest" (純自利)—attachment masked as love [28584]. Real self-benefit in parenting or intimacy requires turning inward to observe one's own underlying fear, possessiveness, and ignorance (*avidyā*, 無明). When you work through your own emotional triggers, you purify your own mind (self-benefit); as an immediate result, your child or partner receives non-reactive, unconditional presence (benefiting others). Here, the boundary begins to blur: *he/she benefiting from your clarity is your own spiritual growth* (他利即自利) [36496].


Why Modern People Need It

Modern culture is locked in an exhausting tug-of-war between two extremes: hyper-individualistic self-indulgence (disguised as "self-care" or consumer gratification) and toxic burnout (driven by hustle culture or codependent hyper-responsibility).

1. Disentangling "Self-Care" from Consumerist Hedonism

Contemporary "self-care" often encourages us to soothe stress with retail therapy, indulgence, or digital retreat. However, modern neuroscience and behavioral psychology show that hedonic pleasure triggers short-term dopamine spikes that frequently lead to habituation, attention fragmentation, and increased baseline anxiety.

Buddhist *svārtha* offers a far deeper framework: true self-benefit is not feeding the ego's appetites, but deconditioning the mind from its addictions. While cognitive science tracks how neuroplasticity changes brain networks through mindfulness, Buddhism points out the ultimate goal: eradicating the root cognitive barriers (*jñeyāvaraṇa*) and afflictive barriers (*kleśāvaraṇa*) that distort our perception of reality [31261].

2. Protecting Altruism from Empathy Fatigue

In an hyper-connected world, we are bombarded by global suffering through news feeds. Many empathetic individuals fall into severe emotional fatigue or cynical numbness.

Here, the classical rule—*"First benefit oneself, then benefit others"* (先自利,後利人)—acts as a vital spiritual circuit breaker [36346, 36495]. It reminds us that compassion without wisdom and inner stability is unsustainable. You cannot pour from an empty cup. Establishing self-benefit—developing deep meditative grounding (*samādhi*) and clear seeing (*vipassanā*)—is the prerequisite for building an unshakeable, non-reactive capacity to help the world.


Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications

Misunderstanding 1: "Self-benefit (*svārtha*) is just a polite word for selfishness."

* Clarification: Selfishness is driven by the false illusion of a concrete "I" (*ātman*) seeking to hoard resources or pleasure at the expense of others. Classical texts explicitly classify this as "Pure Self-Interest" (純自利) and declare that it must be completely abandoned by spiritual practitioners [28584]. Authentic *svārtha* involves the cultivation of the Six Paramitās, the dismantling of greed and anger, and the ultimate realization that the ego is empty of inherently existing self-nature [11563, 36843].

Misunderstanding 2: "In Mahāyāna Buddhism, a true Bodhisattva should completely disregard self-benefit and only care about others."

* Clarification: While the *Yogācārabhūmi-śāstra* notes that Bodhisattvas value benefiting others above all else (unlike the Hearer/Śrāvaka path, which focuses primarily on personal liberation) [28722], the canon repeatedly rejects the total abandonment of self-benefit as foolishness [36495]. The *Daśabhūmikāvibhāṣā* clearly states: *"If one thinks oneself wise and discards personal benefit to benefit others, in the eyes of true wisdom, this is great folly"* [36495]. Self-benefit provides the strength, wisdom, and liberation without which "benefiting others" becomes an empty, ineffective promise.

Misunderstanding 3: "Self-benefit and benefiting others are zero-sum opposites."

* Clarification: This dualistic view only exists at the novice level. At deeper stages of realization, self-benefit and benefiting others become a single, non-dual reality. As the *Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra* emphasizes, when a practitioner achieves "the equanimity of self and other" (得他自心平等), when another person receives spiritual benefit, the Bodhisattva directly experiences it as their own fulfillment [31881, 32435]. Ultimately, as the *Diamond Sūtra* (*Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra*) illustrates, a Bodhisattva liberates all sentient beings while perceiving that, in ultimate truth, no individual self exists to be liberated. At the highest level, *benefiting others is itself the ultimate fulfillment of self-benefit* (即用利他以為自義) [30489].

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「自利」(svārtha)在佛教经典中,主要指修行者自身功德的圆满、烦恼的断除与解脱境界的证得。在世间或修行初阶,自利表现为自身善心的增长、波罗蜜的具足,以及免于生死的勤苦方便;在究竟层面,自利则等同于远离烦恼障与智障、证得无障碍清净法身。大乘佛教强调自利与利他的双运,自利不仅是利他的先行基础,在修行深入至自他平等时,二者更是相即不二、互为依止的辩证统一体。

二、主要阐述

1. 自利之修行内涵与行相

各经论对自利在修行实践中的具体行相有广泛的论述: * 善心与波罗蜜之具足:《十住毘婆沙論》指出,修行者思惟分别,忆念三宝、菩萨众,并修持布施、持戒、忍辱、精进、禅定、智慧而深发善心,即是自利;并明确定义「自利者,能具諸波羅蜜」。此外,在师徒供给的脉络中,若不看重弟子的物质供给而专意于法施,亦属于自利。 * 甚深法门之修持:《大寶積經》将自利的实践与法宝积集相联系,强调菩萨应勤修一切甚深之法,以资粮心哀愍利益求佛之智,不于少法生执著或厌足。 * 动态之收摄(入四门):《無量壽經優波提舍》以空间性的「入」与「出」隐喻修行次第,指出菩萨通过「入四种门」的内向收摄状态,来成就自利行。 * 自体果之功德增长:《大乘莊嚴經論》将自利定义为「自体果」或「大义」,其行相为「功德增长」,且在思度、数数、时节上皆无量,属于毕竟恒行、无有分齐的修行。

2. 自利与利他的辩证关系

自利与利他的关系是各部论典探讨的核心: * 并重双修:《大寶積經》强调菩萨应「住自利及以利他」,并以善精进力坚固无退转,在并修中观察自他之想皆不可得,从而契入诸法无我。 * 先后次第:《十住毘婆沙論》提出世间通则「凡物皆先自利,後能利人」,强调自利是利他的基础,若舍己利而急求利他,反易失利生悔;但若知自身力量不堪任,便不应勉强承受,此亦是自利利他的「善方便」。 * 相即不二:随着修行深入,自利与利他走向融合。《十住毘婆沙論》指出菩萨发菩提心,于他事心意不劣弱,故「他利即自利」;《大乘莊嚴經論》指出,当菩萨「得他自心平等」时,不复分别自利与他利,他得益时即是菩萨自得益;《瑜伽師地論》亦指出,如来「即用利他以為自義」,彰显二者在果位上的圆满不二。

3. 自利之究竟境界与佛德、佛身

自利的究竟完成,直接对应于佛陀的果德与佛身成就: * 究竟解脱与无畏:《大寶積經》描述自利究竟之境为「已度於有海,導師所作辦,亦捨於彼岸,自利得無畏」,即不住生死亦不住涅槃的无畏境界。 * 清净法身之证得:《究竟一乘寶性論》明确将「成就自身利益」定义为远离烦恼障与智障,证得无障碍清净法身;并指出佛宝八德中的前三德(无为体、自然、不依他知)皆属于自利范畴。 * 佛身之显现:《大乘莊嚴經論》指出诸佛的「善满身」由自利究竟而成,并以「食身」为自利成就之相,而「化身」为他利成就之相。 * 如来四无畏:《瑜伽師地論》将如来四无畏的前二处(一切法现等正觉、一切漏尽)归为自利行圆满的体现。

4. 自利之分类与应断应修

《瑜伽師地論》对自利进行了严密的分类,区分了「纯自利」与「自利共他」: * 纯自利(应断):包括为己乐求财受用、吝法、为求生天受乐而持戒、贪图利养、耽著诸定而弃舍利众生事等,菩萨对此皆应断除。 * 自利共他(应修):以悲心为首,或为回向无上菩提而修持施、忍等,于自利中兼行利他,此为菩萨所应勤修。同时,论中指出声闻以「自利为胜、不顾利他」,而菩萨则以「利他为胜」。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的部类与经典中,关于「自利」及相关概念的术语表述存在细微而重要的差异: 1. 自利与己利、自义: * 《大寶積經》、《十住毘婆沙論》、《瑜伽師地論》、《大乘莊嚴經論》等多数经典通用「自利」一词。 * 《十住毘婆沙論》在论述世间先后次第时,亦使用「己利」(如「若自成己利,乃能利於彼」)。 * 《瑜伽師地論》在论述精进之果效时,使用「自義」(指证得离系果与往生善趣之异熟果),并与「他义」、「俱义」对举。 * 《究竟一乘寶性論》则常使用「自利益」或「自身利益」来表达这一概念。 2. 自利行与入四门: * 《無量壽經優波提舍》使用「自利行」一词,并将其具体化为「入四種門」的修行,与「利益他迴向行」(出第五门)相对。 3. 佛身译名的独特表述: * 《大乘莊嚴經論》以「食身」作为自利成就之相,此译名在本论中较为独特,在其他经典或译本中通常被译为「报身」或「应身」。 * 《究竟一乘寶性論》则以「第一義諦身」或「真諦身」代表自利,而以「世諦體」代表利他。

四、与相关概念的关系

* 利他 / 他利 / 利益他迴向行:自利与利他是相辅相成的对立统一体。自利是利他的基础,如《究竟一乘寶性論》中代表利他的「世諦體」必须依止于代表自利的「第一義諦身」;《無量壽經優波提舍》中,入四门的自利行与出第五门的利他迴向行相资,方能速证菩提。在究竟层面,利他即是自利,二者无二无别。 * 波罗蜜多:自利是波罗蜜多的修持与具足。《十住毘婆沙論》直接以「能具諸波羅蜜」释自利;而《大乘莊嚴經論》则对六度进行了分摄,指出后三波罗蜜(精进、禅定、智慧/解脱)摄自利三事,前三波罗蜜(施、不恼、忍恼)摄利他三事。 * 五智:《瑜伽師地論》将五智与自利、利他行相配对,指出「世俗智、勝義智、作究竟智」依于自利行,而「他心智、十力智」则依于利他行。 * :《大乘莊嚴經論》以「賊奴畏主勤作」来比喻自利之人的修行(因怖畏生死而勤修方便),并赞叹「信」能成就自利与他利。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《大寶積經》: > 「菩薩能決定,自利及利他,以善精進力,堅固無退轉。」 2. 《十住毘婆沙論》: > 「若自成己利,乃能利於彼。」 > 「自利者,能具諸波羅蜜;利他者,教化眾生令住三寶。」 3. 《無量壽經優波提舍》: > 「菩薩入四種門,自利行成就應知……菩薩出第五門,利益他迴向行成就應知。」 4. 《究竟一乘寶性論》: > 「成就自身利益者,謂得解脫,遠離煩惱障、遠離智障,得無障礙清淨法身。」

By SutraAI-generated

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》中論及「自利」之概念,主要與「利他」並舉,呈現菩薩行中自利利他雙運之特色,且兼及自利究竟成就之境界。

一、自利與利他並重雙修

經中將「自利」與「利他」並列,作為菩薩行者應當安住之實踐準則。長行文中明確開示修行者「應住自利及以利他」,並須「應善觀察自他之想」,進而「入一切法皆悉無我」,顯示自利並非孤立追求個人解脫,而是於自利利他並行之中,透過觀察自他之想皆不可得,契入諸法無我之深旨。 又以偈頌形式重申此義:「菩薩能決定,自利及利他,以善精進力,堅固無退轉。」此頌以「決定」一詞點出菩薩於自利利他之志願堅定不移,並以「善精進力」與「堅固無退轉」說明其成就自利利他所需之動力與品質。

二、自利究竟完成之境界

在另一偈頌中,經文以導師(佛陀)為例,描述自利究竟完成之境界:「已度於有海,導師所作辦,亦捨於彼岸,自利得無畏。」此中「已度於有海」指已度過生死有海,「所作辦」指佛事已究竟辦畢,「亦捨於彼岸」指不住著於涅槃彼岸,「自利得無畏」則明自利之究竟成就,在於證得無所畏懼之究竟解脫功德。此頌顯示自利之完成,須度已竟、捨亦竟,方得究竟無畏;不住生死,亦不住涅槃,方為自利之極致。

三、自利與法寶積集教之修行實踐

在論述法寶積集教時,經文強調菩薩應「勤修一切甚深之法」,並須「以資糧心哀愍利益求佛之智」,「若稱揚法、若流傳法、若演說法」,同時「不於少法而生執著」、「不於少法而生厭足」、「亦不應以下劣精進希求上智」。此等修行態度與自利之實踐密切相關,顯示菩薩自利之核心,在於不斷精進求證一切智智,廣修甚深法門而不生厭足。

四、術語特色

本經論述自利所用術語為「自利」一詞,與「利他」相對並舉,相關概念尚有「自他之想」、「我清淨」等,皆強調破除自他分別、入於無我清淨之法界。經中未見其他特殊異譯詞,而「自利利他」並舉之語境貫穿於長行與偈頌之中,形成本經論述此概念之一貫特色。

十住毘婆沙論T1521 · 釋經論部

《十住毘婆沙論》直接以「自利」與「利他」對舉。論主造論時,思惟分別,憶念三寶、菩薩眾及布施、持戒、忍辱、精進、禪定、智慧,因而深發善心,稱為「自利」;演說並照明正法,以無比供養供養諸佛,則稱為「利他」。自利在此首先表現為由憶念正法與諸善行而增長自身善心。

本論又提出世間通則:「凡物皆先自利,後能利人」,並以偈說「若自成己利,乃能利於彼」;若捨棄自身利益而急欲利他,反可能既失其利,後生憂悔。因此,自利被視為具備利他能力的先行基礎,而非單純與利他相反之事。 同一意思又以「先自成己利,然後乃利人」重申,並嚴厲指出,自以為智慧而捨己利以利人,在世間尺度中反是大癡。

然而,本論論菩薩行時,又顯示自利與利他可以相即。對於捨自利、勤行他利的疑難,論中答稱:世間為他求利尚且稱善,菩薩之行更超出世間;若能利他,即是自利。發菩提心者於他事心意不劣弱,故說「他利即自利」。這是本論論述自利的鮮明側面:先辨世間層次的自利次第,再以菩薩發心說明利他本身亦成自利。

就具體內涵而言,本論明釋:「自利者,能具諸波羅蜜」;與之相對,「利他者,教化眾生令住三寶」。因此,本論所用的核心術語形式是「自利」「利他」「自利利他」「己利」及「他利即自利」,並以「具諸波羅蜜」概括自利的修行內容,而未在所引文段中另立其他同義名目。

自利亦須與行事能力相應。善人先自住於善利,亦能利益他人;菩薩對今世、後世之事,無論自利或利他,若知能行,必使成立;若知力所不堪,便不承受。這表明自利利他並非徒具意願,尚包含衡量自身是否堪任而如實行持。 若能遍知世間事,兼行自利與利他,即名「善方便」。

在師徒供給與法施的脈絡中,本論更細辨自利:若看重弟子的供給,便失法施功德;若不看重供給,則得法施功德,這便名為自利。利他則在於使受教者因恭敬法、尊重師而獲大利,而非令其誤認教師只為世利而教誨。故不望眾生供給而善加供給、教導眾生,能成就「自利利他」。

無量壽經優波提舍T1524 · 釋經論部

本論《無量壽經優波提舍》以「五門」之架構闡述自利與利他之行相。文中首先標示:「菩薩入四種門,自利行成就應知」,明確指出菩薩以「入」四門之方式,完成自利行之修行;接著又說:「菩薩出第五門,利益他迴向行成就應知」,指出菩薩以「出」第五門之方式,成就利益他迴向行之實踐。最後總結:「菩薩如是修五門行自利利他,速得成就阿耨多羅三藐三菩提故」,強調菩薩依此五門修行自利利他二行,能夠迅速成就無上正等正覺。

本論之獨特側面在於以「入」、「出」二動態概念區隔自利與利他:自利對應於「入」之狀態,利他對應於「出」之狀態。此一「入」、「出」之分別,顯示本論以空間性之移動隱喻詮釋修行之次第——自利為內向之收攝而入,利他則為外向之開展而出。「入四種門」與「出第五門」之表述,將自利利他二行安置於五門之修行體系中,呈現次第階升之結構:前四門攝於自利,第五門屬於利他迴向。

本論所用之核心術語,包括:「自利行」——指入四門以成就自身功德之修行;「利益他迴向行」——指出第五門以迴向成就利他之修行;「五門行」——總攝自利利他之五種修行門;「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」——即無上正等正覺,為自利利他圓滿所趨之果。其中,「迴向」一詞之使用,凸顯利他行非獨自完成,須將自利之功德迴向眾生,方得成就;而「自利行」之表述,則直接對應於本條目所論之「自利」概念,指成就自身解脫與功德之修行。

值得注意者,本論並未孤立地談自利,而是將自利與利他置於同一架構中觀察,強調二行相資、缺一不可:若僅入四門而不出第五門,則自利行雖成而利他迴向未圓;若僅出第五門而不入四門,則利他無以為本。故本論以「如是修五門行自利利他」之語,將二行和合並舉,並以此作為速證阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之因。

從修行之因果觀之,本論以「速得成就」說明自利利他圓滿之果德——非遲緩漸成,而是依五門修行而速疾成就無上正等正覺。此一「速」字,亦點出五門行法之殊勝,顯示自利利他二行圓滿之果並非遙不可及,而是依如法修行即得疾證。

Related