Dharma · AI Companion

空解脫門

śūnyatā-vimokṣamukha

观诸法空而趣入解脱的法门。AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

〔声闻〕三三昧之一,观空、非我(1);〔大乘〕正面重释为观诸法无自性空(2)

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In the Buddhist system of the path to liberation, the "emptiness liberation gate" (空解脫門, śūnyatā-vimokṣa-mukha, "the liberation gate of emptiness") is the first of the famed "three liberation gates" (三解脫門, trivimokṣa-mukha: emptiness, signlessness, wishlessness). If nirvāṇa (涅槃, "final liberation") is likened to a city, the liberation gate is the entrance that leads into that city; the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (《大宝积经》) directly calls it the 「涅槃先道」("foremost path to nirvāṇa").

To understand the emptiness liberation gate with precision, one must never reduce it to the everyday sense of "a blank mind" or a passive "utter despair." Its core definition is extremely clear and rigorous: to know that all phenomena (諸法, sarvadharma, "all dharmas") are entirely empty and still, with no self (無我, anātman) and no belonging-to-self (我所, ātmīya), and thereby to depart from all marks (相, nimitta) and clinging (執着, upādāna), as the path that leads to nirvāṇa.

To unpack this concept, the classical treatises and sūtras (such as the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* and the *Mahāvaipulya-mahāsaṃnipāta Sūtra* (《大方等大集经》)) delineate its content and boundaries with great clarity:

1. All phenomena are intrinsically empty and still; no self, no mine

"Emptiness" does not mean that things are empty only after being smashed or annihilated; rather, it means that all phenomena, at the very moment of arising and ceasing, coming and going, are by their very nature "devoid of intrinsic nature" (自性離) and "empty in essence" (體性空).

* Scope: The "all phenomena" here admits no exception. It includes not only the myriad things of the present world — causes and conditions, karmic retribution, the cycle of birth and death — all "conditioned phenomena" (有為法, saṃskṛta-dharma, "conditioned dharmas") — but even nirvāṇa itself, which practitioners long for, is empty in its essence. * No self, no mine: The composition of sentient beings' body and mind — the five aggregates (五陰, pañcaskandha), the twelve sense bases (十二入, dvādaśāyatana), and the eighteen elements (十八界, aṣṭādaśa-dhātu), collectively called in the sūtras "the aggregates and elements" (蘊界, skandha-dhātu) or "the dharmas of the aggregates, sense bases, and elements" (陰入界法) — is like something produced by illusion (幻, māyā): there is fundamentally no fixed, unchanging "self" (我) as a subject, nor a "mine" (我所) belonging to it.

2. In the ultimate sense, there is no agent, no receiver, and even no one liberated

This is the most subtle — and most easily misunderstood — tenet of the emptiness liberation gate:

* Conventional truth vs. ultimate truth: In ordinary experience, karmic action and retribution "never fail" (不失壞) — if you cut down a tree, the tree falls; if you harm a person, you bear the consequences. But in the reality of the ultimate truth (勝義諦, paramārtha-satya — also the "ultimate meaning," 第一義, paramārtha), phenomena are merely the gathering and dispersing of causes and conditions, in which there is neither a substantial "agent of deeds" (造業者, kāraka) nor a substantial "receiver of retribution" (受報者, vedaka). * No one liberated: Even liberation itself, the sūtra penetratingly points out: 「已得解脱门,无有解脱者,烦恼本亦无。」 — "Having attained the liberation gate, there is no one liberated; the afflictions themselves are originally non-existent." There is no fixed "self" that suffers, and no fixed "self" that reaches the far shore.

3. The realm is dreamlike and illusory; no coming, no going

The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* devotes great length to enumerating dreams (dreaming of being chased by ghosts, dreaming of separation from loved ones, dreaming of beautiful women, dreaming of being swept away by great floods, and so on). The fear and joy within dreams feel utterly real, but upon waking and examining them, they are 「毕竟无」("ultimately nothing") and 「都无有实」("altogether without reality"). Ordinary beings create karma and suffer precisely because, within dreamlike and illusory appearances, they 「妄生执着」("falsely give rise to clinging") and are dragged through saṃsāra by the final consciousness and the causal conditions of karma. In fact, 「无有一法从于今世至于后世而有生灭」("there is not a single dharma that passes from this life to the next life with arising and ceasing").

4. The interpenetrating relationship with "signlessness" and "wishlessness"

The three liberation gates are not three unrelated paths, but a single whole that "walks together with emptiness" (與空共行):

* Because one knows that phenomena are originally empty, one does not even cling to the "mark of emptiness" itself — this is the signless liberation gate (無相解脫門, ānimitta-vimokṣa-mukha: "emptiness has no emptiness-mark," 空無空相); * Because one knows that there is not a single dharma to be obtained, one naturally no longer craves or flees outwardly — this is the wishless liberation gate (無願解脫門, apraṇihita-vimokṣa-mukha: "when there is no mark, there is no wish," 無於相則無願求).


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

So that the emptiness liberation gate does not degenerate into an abstract philosophical term, we can take the real bodily and mental experience of a modern person "being stabbed in the back at work" or "scrolling social media late at night" and walk it through step by step within the practical framework of the classical sūtras:

Scenario: Working late at night, you discover that a colleague has taken credit for your project results; your heart rate spikes, and you are filled with rage

* Step One: Contemplate the body and the agent as empty ("the agent has no body; the body has no agent") * The contemporary myth: We usually think: "He stole my credit, and I am trembling with anger right now." * Walking through the sūtra's meaning: According to the *Mahāsaṃnipāta Sūtra* (《大集经》), at this moment one should contemplate 「作者无身、身无作者」("the agent has no body; the body has no agent"). That instant of "trembling, rapid heartbeat, stomach cramping" is merely a chain reaction of physiological nerves and hormones (the form aggregate, 色蘊, rūpa-skandha); that surge of "rage" is merely a gathering of mental feelings and perceptions — feeling, perception, volition, consciousness (受、想、行、識, vedanā, saṃjñā, saṃskāra, vijñāna). Within this, one cannot find a fixed "victim-self," nor a fixed "perpetrator-he." There is only a series of phenomena arising and ceasing through conditions; there is not a single entity "fabricating" this dispute.

* Step Two: Contemplate the mind as without an owner ("there is no one who enters or leaves, nothing that can be distanced, and nothing to be distanced from") * The contemporary myth: Thoughts race through your mind: "How will I get revenge tomorrow? No, I need to calm down. I need to drive this anger away!" * Walking through the sūtra's meaning: Contemplate this angry thought. Where does the thought come from? Where does it go? The sūtra says to contemplate that this mind (心, citta) has no mind-owner, 「无出入者,无能远离也无可远离」("there is no one who enters or leaves; nothing that can be distanced, and nothing to be distanced from"). That "thought of wanting to drive away the anger" and "the anger itself" are both mind-consciousness arising in dependence on conditions. The mind has no fixed owner; you do not need to "distance yourself" from anger, because anger has no substance to begin with — at the very moment it arises, it is already passing away.

* Step Three: Contemplate the aggregates, sense bases, and conditions as empty ("contemplate the five aggregates and the sense bases as without self and mine") * The contemporary myth: Staring at the performance report on the screen, you think: "This is the result of my whole month of hard work (mine)." * Walking through the sūtra's meaning: Contemplate the eye faculty looking at the screen (the eye sense base / eye element, 眼入/眼界), the ears hearing the keyboard sounds, the brain processing data. All of this bodily and mental functioning (the dharmas of aggregates, sense bases, and elements, 陰入界法) is a product of assembled conditions (causes and conditions, 因緣, hetu-pratyaya). The report is a combination of text and pixels; reputation is electrical signals in other people's brains. The "result" does not carry a substantial label reading "belongs to me."

* Step Four: Contemplate the dreamlike and illusory, and "no receiver of retribution" * The contemporary myth: "This is so unfair! Who will repay me for all the grievances I have suffered in this life?" * Walking through the sūtra's meaning: As the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* illustrates, this is like dreaming that the grain you had painfully accumulated is snatched away by an enemy, and you weep bitterly in the dream. Upon waking, where is the grain? Where is the enemy? And where is the person who wept? At the conventional level, one communicates and appeals as appropriate ("karmic deeds and their retribution never fail," 作業果報皆不失壞); but at the ultimate level, deep in your heart you understand: 「无有作业者,无有受报者。」 — "There is no agent of deeds, no receiver of retribution." The mind can then immediately withdraw from resentment and attain great stillness.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Our era is one that "places extreme emphasis on subjectivity and ownership." From childhood we are taught to build a strong "self" (Self), to possess more and more of "my" property, reputation, social influence, and emotional value. Yet this extreme inflation of "I" and "mine" is precisely the root of contemporary anxiety, mental exhaustion, and existential crisis.

1. Breaking the "attachment to illusion" of the algorithmic age

Algorithms and social media have constructed an unprecedented "dreamlike and illusory" world. Online, we fly into rage over a trending topic, feel inferior when our like counts drop, and tear into strangers over virtual identity labels. How similar this is to the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra*'s "dreaming of beautiful women, dreaming of drinking wine and becoming drunk, dreaming of fighting with enemies"! The emptiness liberation gate is like a scalpel, reminding us: these digital signals that shake your emotions are, in essence, 「毕竟无」("ultimately nothing") and 「体性空」("empty in essence"). Step back, and you can wake from the dream woven by algorithms.

2. Deconstructing the pain of "self-efficacy" collapse

Contemporary people, when facing unemployment, illness, the rupture of intimate relationships, or aging, often experience the shattering of the "self." The emptiness liberation gate tells us: the body and mind are originally a dynamic process of "no-self" (the aggregates, sense bases, and elements are empty, 陰入界空). You are not that "failed career person," nor that "abandoned one." Phenomena arise and cease, but within phenomena there has never been a fixed, unchanging "you" that is destroyed.

3. In dialogue with contemporary cognitive science and the limits of AI

* Overlap with cognitive science: Modern brain science and psychology (such as "predictive processing theory" or the brain's "default mode network," DMN) have also found that the brain constructs an illusion of a "self" in order to integrate sensory information. This dovetails with the Buddhist observation of "no-self" (無我) and "the faculties are like illusion" (諸根如幻). * The limits: However, science is merely a "descriptive" tool. It can use MRI to tell you which region of the brain is constructing the self, but it cannot directly grant you the liberating wisdom of "cutting off clinging" (斷除執著). Scientific analogies cannot be equated with the direct realization (實證) of the Dharma. The emptiness liberation gate is not merely a cognitive theory; it is a practical system that requires "recollecting the emptiness gate in walking, standing, sitting, and lying down" (行住坐臥念空門), aimed at severing the chain reaction of suffering.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: Emptiness = nothing at all (annihilationist emptiness / nihilism)

* Clarification: This is the most common misreading. Many people, upon hearing "all is empty," feel that life has no meaning; since there is no self and no person, one might as well give up and commit evil freely. * Correction from the classical sūtras: The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* particularly emphasizes 「作业果报皆不失坏,但随世俗故有,非第一义」 — "karmic deeds and their retribution never fail; they exist only in accordance with the conventional, not in the ultimate sense." The emptiness liberation gate absolutely does not negate the conventional law of cause and effect. Fire burns people, food satisfies hunger, evil brings evil retribution, good deeds bring good rewards — these operate ceaselessly within conventional truth. Emptiness means that phenomena have no independent, eternal intrinsic nature (體性空), not that phenomena do not exist. Confusing the ultimate with the conventional and falling into annihilationist views is regarded in Buddhism as a grave deviation.

Misreading Two: Taking "emptiness" as a brain state or "passive escape"

* Clarification: Some think that cultivating the emptiness liberation gate means emptying the mind, thinking of nothing, or numbing oneself with "it's all empty anyway" when encountering setbacks. * Correction from the classical sūtras: The emptiness-cultivation system shown in the *Mahāsaṃnipāta Sūtra* (such as contemplating the body and the agent as empty, contemplating the aggregates, sense bases, and elements and their conditions as empty, the four emptiness gates, 四空門, and so on) is an extremely refined, active discernment of wisdom (簡擇) — discerning more than twenty kinds of emptiness. It uses extremely clear awareness to see through the nature of phenomena, not the numbness of an anesthetic. Numbness is "delusion" (癡, moha); the emptiness liberation gate is "wisdom" (慧, prajñā).

Misreading Three: Since "there is no one liberated," practice is meaningless

* Clarification: Since there is no "self" being liberated, why should I practice so hard? * Correction from the classical sūtras: The sūtra says, 「已得解脱门,无有解脱者,烦恼本亦无」 — "Having attained the liberation gate, there is no one liberated; the afflictions themselves are originally non-existent." Precisely because "the afflictions are originally non-existent" (煩惱本亦無), practice can succeed! If afflictions and suffering had substance and were eternal, no amount of practice could remove them. It is precisely because suffering, afflictions, and even the clinging to "self" are all produced by conditions and empty in essence that, as soon as one stops supplying them with conditions ("abandoning discrimination," 捨離分別), the bonds naturally loosen. There is no need for a substantial "self" to manufacture a "liberation"; liberation is simply the natural manifestation of originally present stillness after delusion disperses.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

1. 定义与核心要义

「空解脱门」(śūnyatā-vimokṣa-mukha)是佛教三解脱门(空、无相、无愿)的首要门径。根据《大宝积经》,其核心定义为:「一切诸法皆悉空寂。一切诸法空者,是空解脱门」。此法门旨在引导修行者彻底了知诸法自性空寂、无我我所,从而远离一切执着,是通往究竟涅槃的「涅槃先道」。而在《大方等大集经》中,空解脱门被视为简择与修习内外诸法空性的根本工具,修行者依此观照身心、因缘及虚空,能证得寂静与解脱。

2. 主要阐述

综合《大宝积经》与《大方等大集经》的论述,空解脱门的修行与理论阐述主要展开为以下几个维度:

* 诸法体性空寂与无我:诸法在生灭、来去中无所从来、无所至,其本质在于「自性离」与「体性空」。这种空性不仅涵盖世间、业报、生死等有为法,甚至连「涅槃」本身的体性也是空的。众生的身心组成(蕴界)同样无我,如经中所言「蕴界无我犹如幻,决定了知法无性」。 * 无作者与无受者:基于体性空的原理,虽然因缘业报在世俗谛中不失坏,但在胜义谛(第一义)中却无主体。经中强调:「作业果报皆不失坏,无有作业者、无有受报者,但随世俗故有,非第一义」。对于解脱本身亦然,即「已得解脱门,无有解脱者,烦恼本亦无」。 * 如幻如梦的譬喻:为了破除众生对现实的执着,经中大量运用「诸根如幻、境界如梦」的譬喻。凡夫因愚痴而在如幻如梦的境界中妄生执着,造作身口意三业,并在临终时依最后识与业因缘受生五道。实际上,「无有一法从于今世至于后世而有生灭」,一切皆是空寂。 * 具体的观照方法与修行步骤:在实践上,修行者需进行系统的空性观照。包括:观身与作者空(见「作者无身、身无作者」);观心无主(无出入者,无能远离也无可远离);观阴入界与因缘空(观五阴、诸入无我我所);以及观虚空即空以得身心寂静。此外,还有循序渐进的「四空门」修行体系,从观自身骨骼碎灭、观外色坏灭,到断除一切觉观、远离心意识行,逐步深入寂灭。

3. 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同部类与译本中,对于相关概念的译名与表述存在显著差异:

* 身心组成的称呼:唐菩提流志译《大宝积经》中,多使用「蕴界」来统称众生的身心组成;而北凉昙无谶译《大方等大集经》则具有鲜明的早期译经特征,将「五蕴」译为「阴」或「五阴」,将「十二处」中的「处」译为「入」(如「眼入」、「意入」等),并合称为「阴入界法」。 * 空与无相的对应关系:在《大方等大集经》中,对空与无相有独特的内外划分,指出「非内者,无相解脱门;非外者,空解脱门」。 * 空性的分类与简择:《大方等大集经》中列举了内空、外空、内外空、空空、大空、第一义空、有为空、无为空、毕竟空、无始空、散空、性空、自相空、一切法空、不可得空、无法空、有法空、无法有法空等二十多种空性,并强调修行者是「还以空解脱门」来修习和简择这些空性。而《大宝积经》则侧重于列举十种「体性空」的范畴,即「后识体性空、缘体性空、业体性空、死体性空、初识体性空、受(或作『受生』)体性空、世间体性空、涅槃体性空、起体性空、坏体性空」。

4. 与相关概念的关系

* 与无相、无愿解脱门的关系:三解脱门互为贯通。《大宝积经》指出,因「空无空相」而名为「无相解脱门」;若能「无于相」则自然「无愿求」,故名「无愿解脱门」。三者皆是「与空共行」的「涅槃先道」。 * 与魔业、分别的关系:若对诸法进行二分对立的执着即是魔业。唯有通过空解脱门的智慧,「舍离分别则降魔」,在「若有若空无所住」中修习,方能降伏魔怨,证得无生解脱。

5. 代表性原文引用

* 《大宝积经》:「一切诸法皆悉空寂。一切诸法空者,是空解脱门。」 * 《大宝积经》:「作业果报皆不失坏,无有作业者、无有受报者,但随世俗故有,非第一义。」 * 《大宝积经》:「已得解脱门,无有解脱者,烦恼本亦无。」 * 《大方等大集经》:「非内者,无相解脱门;非外者,空解脱门。」 * 《大方等大集经》:「作者无身、身无作者……是名修空解脱门。」

By SutraAI-generated

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》對「空解脫門」的論述,核心在於將其直接等同於「一切諸法空」之觀照。經文明確指出:「一切諸法皆悉空寂,一切諸法空者是空解脫門」,反覆列舉後識、緣、業、死、初識、受、世間、涅槃、起、壞等法皆「體性空」、「自性離故」,故觀此空性即趣入解脫之門,可謂以「空」直名其門。

本經論述之獨特側面,在於將空解脫門置於生死流轉與業報不失之脈絡中展開:後識起滅、業之生滅、死之來去皆「無所從來、無所至」;「作業果報皆不失壞,無有作業者、無有受報者,但隨世俗故有,非第一義」。世俗諦中因果相續不失,第一義中諸法皆空,空解脫門即依此勝義觀而立,亦以夢喻反覆比況凡夫執著之虛妄。

三解脫門之次第與關聯亦為本經要點:「空無空相名無相解脫門,若無於相則無願求名無願解脫門」;「一切法皆具三解脫門,與空共行涅槃先道,遠離於相、遠離願求」,顯示空為先導、無相無願隨之,三門共趣涅槃。

所證之境以「究竟涅槃界,決定如法界,周遍虛空際」形容,並以「諸根如幻、境界如夢」之喻顯其空幻本質。末後偈頌亦云:「行住坐臥念空門,壽者我想皆悉無,一切世間都如幻,眾生愚癡所迷惑」,以日常行住坐臥皆念空門為菩薩之行持,並以「無邊智」、「能求菩提名佛子」讚其功德。

綜觀本經,「空解脫門」非別有一門,即直指一切法空之觀照,以諸法自性離、體性空而得門名;其特色在結合生死因果之世俗見而顯第一義空,並與無相、無願三門共行為涅槃先道。

大方等大集經T0397 · 大集部

《大方等大集經》(北涼曇無讖譯)對「空解脫門」的論述可歸納為下列數端。

一、以「非內非外」定位空解脫門

此經就菩提之體「非作非相」立論,將空解脫門歸於「非外」一極,與「非內」之無相解脫門對舉:「非內者,無相解脫門,非外者,空解脫門」。經中以「內者謂作,外者謂相」區隔兩門,空解脫門側重離「相」以顯空性,與無相解脫門側重無「作」相對待。

二、三解脫門並列中的空解脫門

此經常以空、無相、無願三解脫門並舉。空解脫門界定為:「亦不見作及以作者,作者無身、身無作者,修莊嚴道觀身見身」,觀作者與身皆空。相較無願門觀過去身、無相門觀心不見身,空門更進一步否定「作—作者」之存在;亦有「若觀諸行畢竟盡即無生滅,若無生滅即空因緣」之莊嚴空解脫門之說。觀心一節亦明:「若有比丘觀察是心,無有心主無出入者……是名見於心心得空解脫門」。

三、「空」的具體義涵

此經於解空三昧中分空為五種:陰入界空、諦空、實空、十二因緣空、性空,其釋義為: - 陰空:色乃至識空無我我所; - 入界空:十二入、十八界空; - 諦空:苦集滅道四諦無得無捨; - 實空:一切法中無覺觀我及我所; - 十二因緣空:觀十二支無我我所; - 性空:觀眼乃至意空無我我所。

此經以「陰入界」一詞為說,不同於「蘊處界」之通譯,可視為本經譯語之特色。

四、四空門的修習階位

此經於「空順陀羅尼」之下另設第一至第四空門: - 第一空門:觀自身骨相散壞,「遠離身相,生於空相不見內法」; - 第二空門:觀內外諸色「風力所壞」,於此不念不見; - 第三空門:「一切覺觀悉皆永斷」; - 第四空門:觀識為覺觀因緣,「一切有法體非真實……一切有法性是寂滅」。

五、證得空解脫門之相

此經明言:「若見虛空是空,爾時即得身心寂靜,是則名為空解脫門,取阿羅漢則為不難」;亦云:「彼人若見空即是空,爾時即得身心寂靜,得寂靜已,是則名為空解脫門」。可知「身心寂靜」為證得空解脫門之果相,並由此趣向阿羅漢果。

六、空解脫門作為總攝一切空之門

此經進一步將空解脫門作為入一切空之樞紐:「還以空解脫門,能修簡擇內外等法」,列舉內空、外空、內外空、空空、大空、第一義空、有為空、無為空、畢竟空、無始空、散空、性空、自相空、一切法空、不可得空、無法空、有法空、無法有法空等十八種空,由此可見空解脫門之入處義。

此外,經中提及「空順陀羅尼」,由他方山王如來遣香象菩薩所送;共凡夫、不共凡夫之分別亦見於相關解脫門之說,惟此處僅述原文,不作宗派判釋。

綜觀之,此經之空解脫門兼具「非外之門」的定位義、「作空無作者」的觀行義、「身心寂靜」的證果義與「總攝諸空」的入處義,內涵較一般三解脫門之單列更為豐富。

大智度論T1509 · 釋經論部

《大智度論》以「空解脫門」與「無相解脫門」、「無作解脫門」三門並列論述,視三者為同一法之三種面向,並以「涅槃城三門」為喻說明其義。論中明言:「觀諸法空是名『空』;於空中不可取相,是時空轉名『無相』;無相中不應有所作為三界生,是時無相轉名『無作』」,顯示空解脫門即是觀諸法空、入涅槃之門,三者輾轉相成。論又以「城有三門,一人身不得一時從三門入,若入則從一門」為喻,強調諸法實相即涅槃城,三門各隨行者根性而入。

就所化根機而言,論說應度者有三種:見多者為說空解脫門,因其觀一切法從因緣生、無有自性,自性空故諸見滅;愛多者為說無作解脫門,觀諸法無常、苦而生厭離;愛、見等者為說無相解脫門,以斷男女、一異等相。

論中亦以「自性空、畢竟空、十八空等無量諸空,是空解脫門,不轉、不還」標示其體性,並謂入是三解脫門則捨我、我所心,名為說得解�。又就菩薩法眼所照,論明菩薩能知某眾生以空解脫門入涅槃,某以無相解脫門入涅槃,某以無作解脫門入涅槃,並依行三門,得五根、無間三昧、解脫智,次第證須陀洹乃至辟支佛果。

在菩薩行般若波羅蜜之教授中,論說菩薩以空解脫門入道,亦以此門教化眾生;若入深空法,尚不得法,何況行是法者。又以須菩提空行為對比,顯菩薩空行深廣——二乘得空有分有量,佛、菩薩無分無量,如毛孔之空比十方空不可為喻。

至於性空實踐之告誡,論說菩薩教眾生時,於空解脫門、無相、無作解脫門乃至十八不共法中,「莫念二相、莫念不二相」,因是法性皆空,性空法不應以二相或不二相念。又列空解脫門於四念處、八聖道分等諸修行之中,勸眾生於性空中勤精進,莫起懈怠。

值得注意的是,論中常以「空解脫門」一詞貫通三門,並以「無作」而非「無願」稱第三門;於阿毘曇義中標示「空解脫門緣苦諦�五眾」,於摩訶衍義中則以三門同緣諸法實相,觀世間即是涅槃。

Related