Dharma · AI Companion

無相解脫門

ānimitta-vimokṣamukha

离一切相而趣入解脱的法门。AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span II · emptiness ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

三解脱门之无相门须空性见地立足(2);般若「离一切诸相即名诸佛」「实相无相」为其离言层读法(4),对齐锚点三昧无→4;部派无相心三昧于第一重别立,属同名异指不并入

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Saying

In the Buddhist path to liberation, the Door of Signlessness Liberation (*animitta-vimokṣa-mukha*, 無相解脫門) is one of the "Three Doors of Liberation" (*trivimokṣa-dvāra*, 三解脫門), alongside the Door of Emptiness (*śūnyatā*, 空) and the Door of Wishlessness (*apaṇihita*, 無願). If liberation is likened to passing through a gateway to absolute peace, these three doors represent three distinct yet deeply interwoven contemplative breakthroughs.

To understand the Door of Signlessness, one must first understand what a "sign" (*nimitta*, 相) means in early and Mahāyāna Buddhist epistemology: 1. The Classical Definition of "Name" and "Sign": As formally defined in the *Māhāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*Dābǎojī Jīng*, 大寶積經), "Signs refer to all forms created by the four great elements (*caturdhātu*, 四大: earth, water, fire, wind); Name refers to all non-form aggregates (*skandha*, 蘊)". In short, "sign" encompasses all physical, sensory, and perceptual features—colors, shapes, sounds, genders, and boundaries—that our mind grips onto to categorize the world. "Name" refers to the psychological constructs (feeling, perception, volitional formations, consciousness) attached to them. 2. The Essence of Signlessness: The Door of Signlessness is the practice and realization that all internal and external phenomena (*dharma*, 法) are intrinsically empty of permanent, self-existing characteristics. Because all things are dependently originated, they have no intrinsic, fixed "sign" that can be truly grasped. It contemplates that all phenomena are fundamentally unproduced and unceasing (*anutpādāniruddha*, 無生無滅).

The Progression of the Three Doors: Overcoming the Concept of Emptiness

A central contribution of the *Māhāratnakūṭa Sūtra* is its articulation of the precise, progressive relationship among the Three Doors: > *"That all phenomena are empty is the Door of Emptiness; that emptiness itself has no sign of emptiness is called the Door of Signlessness; when there are no signs, there is no conceptual grasping or seeking, which is called the Door of Wishlessness."*

Many practitioners fall into a subtle spiritual trap: after recognizing that all things are empty of a self (*anātman*, 無我), they mentally solidify "emptiness" into a conceptual object—a void, a grand nothingness, or a rigid philosophy. They swap a material attachment for a spiritual one.

The Door of Signlessness functions as the ultimate deconstructive tool: it abolishes even the "sign of emptiness" (*空無空相*). It prevents emptiness from becoming another concept to hold onto. When even the sign of emptiness dissolves into non-conceptual reality, the mind naturally stops projecting desires or future attachments onto reality—entering the Door of Wishlessness (*無願解脫門*).

The Anatomy of the Door: Non-Fabrication and Deconstruction of Identity

The *Mahāsaṁnipāta Sūtra* (*Dàfāngděng Dàjí Jīng*, 大方等大集經) grounds the Door of Signlessness in the fundamental nature of Enlightenment (*bodhi*): * **Non-Internal (*非內*) & Non-Fabricated (*無所造作*)**: The sūtra states that the Door of Signlessness corresponds to "non-internality," defined as being completely devoid of mental/physical fabrication (*無所造作*) and unconditioned by karma of body, speech, or mind (*非身口意業*). * Transcending Gender and the Mara-Realm: In the *Māhāratnakūṭa Sūtra*, Signlessness is illustrated through contemplating the sense bases (e.g., the eye-element or *yatanas*, 「眼入」). Because the eye's intrinsic nature is completely ungraspable across past, present, and future, there is no real "male" or "female" nature to be found within it. Clinging to fixed signs like male/female or "I" and "Mine" (*ātma-ātmiya*, 我、我所) is explicitly categorized as the Realm of Māra (the demonic realm of delusion). Conversely, relinquishing conceptual discrimination (*捨離分別*) and abiding in signlessness is the Realm of the Buddhas.

The Ten Dream Analogies: Seeing Through Sensory Constructs

To shatter our deep-seated illusion that sensory signs are solid realities, the *Māhāratnakūṭa Sūtra* employs ten vivid dream analogies: 1. Fighting an enemy in a dream. 2. Seeing a ghost/demon. 3. Experiencing painful separation from loved ones. 4. Seeing a decaying corpse. 5. Seeing one's own nose or tongue destroyed. 6. Seeing an extraordinarily beautiful woman. 7. Seeing one's physical body broken. 8. Seeing an illusionist perform sensory delights (*五欲*). 9. Being swept away by a raging flood. 10. Drinking wine and becoming intoxicated.

In all ten scenarios, the fear, desire, grief, or pleasure felt during the dream is hyper-real to the sleeper. Yet, upon waking, not a single physical "sign" or event truly occurred. The canonical texts stress that our six sense faculties (*indriya*, 六根) and their objects are precisely like this: "The faculties are like illusions; the sensory realms are like dreams" (*諸根如幻、境界如夢*). Recognizing this allows the practitioner to let go of sign-based craving (*遠離於相、遠離願求*) and realize ultimate Peace (*nirvāṇa*).


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life

To understand how Signlessness applies today, let us trace a common modern scenario step-by-step through the precise classical framework.

Scenario: The Social Media Notification & Performance Review

Imagine you are sitting at your desk. An email pops up with your annual performance review score, or you post a piece of personal work online and watch the metrics (likes, comments, critiques) roll in.

Let us map this experience against the classical definitions:

1. **Grasping the "Sign" (*相*)**: * *Classical definition*: "Sign refers to all forms created by the four great elements." * *Contemporary mapping*: The glowing pixels on your phone, the numerical metric ("4/5 rating", "1,200 likes"), the text glyphs forming a critical comment. Your brain instantly abstracts these sensory inputs into concrete, rigid signs: "Success," "Failure," "Attraction," or "Insult." 2. **Attaching the "Name" (*名*)**: * *Classical definition*: "Name refers to all non-form aggregates" (feeling, perception, volitions, mental consciousness). * *Contemporary mapping*: The physical pixel-data (sign) triggers an instant cascade of internal mental activity (name). *Feeling*: a sudden surge of anxiety or pride. *Perception*: labeling yourself as "incompetent" or "a genius." *Volition*: the immediate urge to type a defense or boast.

3. **Falling into the "Realm of Māra" (*魔境界*)**: * *Classical definition*: "That which possesses 'I' and 'Mine' is the realm of Māra." * *Contemporary mapping*: You fully identify with the notification. The metric becomes "My value," "My status," "My reputation." You feel personally attacked or inflated. You are now fully entrapped by conceptual signs.

4. **Applying the Walkthrough of Signlessness (*無相解脫門*)**: * Step 1: Contemplating the Sense Faculty as Empty: You look at the eye reading the screen ("eye-element" / *眼入*). As the sūtras state, the eye's intrinsic nature is completely empty and ungraspable across past, present, and future. The eye is merely light-sensitive cells receiving electromagnetic waves. * Step 2: Seeing Through the Dream Analogy: Remember the dream of "seeing an illusionist perform sensory delights" or "fighting an enemy". The comment on your screen has no more concrete, self-existing reality than an enemy shouted at you inside a dream last night. The pixel arrangement possesses no inherent power to harm or exalt your actual nature. * **Step 3: Contemplating Unproduced and Unceasing (*無生無滅*)**: The status of "success" or "failure" was never genuinely born as a fixed entity; it is a temporary, dependently co-arisen blip of data, context, and subjective interpretation. * **Step 4: Dissolving the Sign of Emptiness (*空無空相*)**: You do not retreat into a cynical void ("Nothing matters, life is fake"). That would be clinging to the *sign of emptiness*. Instead, you simply engage the work, address the email, or put down the phone without carrying the mental weight of a fixed identity.

Where Modern People Commonly Misapply This Mapping:

* The Error of Numbness / Nihilism: Modern people often mistake "signlessness" for ignoring sensory reality or acting detached and cold. They think "If physical forms are signs, I should pretend I don't see them." Classical Buddhism emphasizes that Signlessness is not blindness or sensory deprivation; it is seeing the signs clearly with wisdom without letting the mind create conceptual hooks (*無所造作*).


Why Contemporary People Need It

Modern society is an unprecedented "Sign-Factory." Never in human history have human beings been bombarded with so many engineered, high-density perceptual signs: algorithmically curated feeds, corporate branding, political identity labels, notifications, and artificial avatars.

1. Liberation from "Hyper-Signification" & Algorithmic Anxiety

Algorithmic life thrives on turning everything into a sign: human worth is signed as follower counts; complex opinions are reduced to binary tags; physical appearance is filtered into narrow aesthetic templates. * The AI / Digital Mirror: Generative AI and algorithms curate "signs" perfectly designed to trigger your mental aggregates (*名*). If you do not understand Signlessness, your mind will be constantly manipulated by these artificial projections—reacting with outrage, envy, or despair to what the sūtras call "mirror images" (*如鏡像*) or "dream states". * The Signless Shield: Contemplating Signlessness acts as a cognitive circuit-breaker. It allows a modern individual to operate within high-tech environments without letting sensory inputs anchor into toxic self-concepts.

2. Healing Identity Wars and Gender/Status Obsessions

In the *Māhāratnakūṭa Sūtra*, the Buddha specifically targets gender and identity signs: *"In the emptiness of sense-bases, there is neither male nor female nature to be found."* Contemporary culture is locked in intense battles over external identity markers—age, net worth, gender, career title, social rank. While these classifications have conventional social functions, making them the absolute foundation of human identity leads directly to suffering. Signlessness liberates the individual from defining their core human dignity through transient, constructed categories.

3. Cognitive Science & Neuroscience: A Productive Dialogue

Modern cognitive science and neuroscience offer fascinating parallels to the Buddhist analysis of "signs": * Predictive Processing Models: Neuroscience increasingly views the brain as a "prediction engine." The brain does not passively record objective reality; it projects constructed mental models (top-down concepts or "names/signs") onto raw sensory input (bottom-up data). What we perceive as "reality" is largely a controlled hallucination created by past conditioning. * The Parallel: This aligns closely with the Buddhist insight that the sensory realms are constructed like "dreams and illusions" (*境界如夢*). * The Critical Distinction & Scientific Limitation: Science *describes* the neuro-computational mechanism of sensory construction. However, neuroscience alone cannot deliver spiritual liberation (*vimukti*). Recognizing that the brain constructs reality does not automatically free a person from existential suffering or greed, because cognitive science lacks the contemplative path of ethical purity (*śīla*), meditative absorption (*samādhi*), and the ultimate cessation of unwholesome root causes (greed, anger, delusion). Science explains the machinery; Signlessness extinguishes the attachment to the machine.


Common Misinterpretations and Clarifications

Misinterpretation 1: "Signlessness means suppressing thoughts, eliminating senses, or entering a trance where you see nothing."

* Clarification: The *Mahāsaṁnipāta Sūtra* explicitly clarifies that true Signlessness is achieved not by shutting off sensory awareness, but by contemplating that all phenomena are natively unproduced and unceasing (*觀一切法無生無滅*). Furthermore, the text notes that in true Signlessness, one "contemplates without a mind seeking absorption" (*觀無有入定之心*), thereby allowing afflictions to drop away naturally without forcing a rigid state of trance. You see colors and hear sounds, but your mind no longer fabricates false, permanent identities out of them (*無所造作*).

Misinterpretation 2: "Signlessness is just another word for Emptiness (Śūnyatā)."

* Clarification: While deeply connected, they represent subtle, progressive stages of realization. As stated in the classical text: *"That all phenomena are empty is the Door of Emptiness; that emptiness itself has no sign of emptiness is called the Door of Signlessness."* Emptiness deconstructs the illusion of a solid self or substantial world. Signlessness deconstructs our lingering conceptual attachment to "emptiness" itself, ensuring the practitioner does not fall into intellectualized dogma.

Misinterpretation 3: "If everything is signless and dream-like, then moral actions and daily responsibilities don't matter."

* Clarification: Classical scriptures explicitly guard against this dangerous trap (often called the "evil void view"). The *Mahāsaṁnipāta Sūtra* records that one who truly realizes the Door of Signlessness "severs all afflictions... yet continuously takes birth in human and heavenly realms without being polluted by desires" (*雖在欲界不為欲污*). Signlessness does not destroy worldly action; it purifies it. When you realize that worldly signs are non-foundational, you act out of selfless compassion (*karuṇā*) and wisdom (*prajñā*), free from ego-driven motives, fear, or territorialism. You live fully in the conventional world while remaining entirely unsoiled by it.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

无相解脱门(animitta-vimokṣa-mukha)是佛教核心修行法门「三解脱门」或「三空解脱门」之一。其核心要义在于通过观照诸法空无相状、无生无灭,从而破除对一切名相与「空」本身的执着,最终证得究竟解脱。在《大宝积经》中,无相解脱门被阐释为对「空」的进一步超越,即「空无空相」;而在《大方等大集经》中,其本质被界定为「非内」、「无所造作」与「非身口意业」,是远离烦恼、证入无漏解脱的重要途径。

二、主要阐述

1. 观诸法无相与破除我执

根据《大宝积经》的论述,修行者可通过观照诸根(如「眼入」等)来证入无相。经中指出,眼入等诸根的体性毕竟空寂,其前际、后际、现在皆不可得。既然诸法体性不可得,则在其中「亦无男女性可得」。若能了悟无男女等相,便能破除「我」与「我所」的执着。经中强调,「有我我所者是魔境界,无我我所者是名诸佛如来境界」。修行者如实了知眼入自性空,远离眼入之相,即是「无相」,以此于相无求,便能使三空解脱门现在前。

2. 梦境譬喻与名相虚妄

《大宝积经》对「名」与「相」进行了明确的术语界定:「相谓四大所造诸色,名谓一切非色之蕴」。经中指出,名与色皆是虚妄不实、如幻如梦的坏法。为了引导众生了悟诸法空寂、远离名相,经中广泛运用了十种梦境譬喻,包括梦中与冤共斗、梦见鬼、梦见亲爱别离、梦见死尸、梦见鼻根或舌根坏、梦见最胜之女、梦见身根坏、梦见幻师作五欲、梦见大水漂荡、以及梦见饮酒等。这些譬喻旨在揭示「诸根如幻、境界如梦」的真相,引导修行者「远离于相、远离愿求」,究竟趣向涅槃。

3. 多维度的修持观法

《大方等大集经》则从多个维度详细阐述了证得无相解脱门的具体观照方法: - 观身与心:比丘在修持时,若「观过去身已,唯见于心而不见身」,并修庄严观身见身,即是修无相解脱门。 - 观诸行毕竟尽:若观照诸行「毕竟尽」即无生灭。经中解释,先有后无才称为「空」,若本无则无后无。这种「毕竟尽者非是有为亦非无为,空亦非行亦非无行」,不为有为或无为所摄的境界,被称为「庄严无相解脱门」。 - 观无入定之心:在观察心心之时,若能「观无有入定之心,而得远离一切烦恼」,因无因缘故烦恼不生,此「远离见于心心」之观即得无相解脱门。 - 观一切法无生无灭:经中以最直接的表述指出:「观一切法无生无灭,是名得无相解脱门」。

4. 功德利益与降魔证忍

修行无相解脱门具有殊胜的功德利益。在《大宝积经》中,修行者通过「于空无相及无愿」得三解脱,能够有效降伏魔怨,并在无生无灭的法性中,了知「有为无为无二相」,证得无生忍。经中强调「舍离分别则降魔」,修行者应当智慧与方便双行,不执著于有或空,方能修习此法门。而在《大方等大集经》中,若能受持、读诵、书写「莲华陀罗尼」,便能得无相解脱门,从而「断诸烦恼,七返常受人天之身,虽在欲界不为欲污」,并能「远离有漏之心,得无漏解脱」。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同经卷与译本中,对于相关佛教术语的翻译与表述存在明显差异: 1. 三解脱门的合称:《大宝积经》(唐菩提流志译)中,将此三者合称为「三解脱门」或「三空解脱门」。 2. 五蕴与阴入界:对于「五蕴」这一概念,《大宝积经》将非色部分称为「非色之蕴」或「四蕴」;而《大方等大集经》则采用「五阴」之译名(如「观于六根五阴犹如镜像」,「五阴生灭」),并使用「阴入界法」来统称五阴、十二处、十八界等法。 3. 处入的称呼:《大宝积经》将十二处中的眼处、耳处、身处等,译为「眼入」、「耳入界」、「身入」。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与「空」、「无愿」的递进关系

《大宝积经》详细阐明了三解脱门之间的递进与超越关系。经中指出:「一切诸法空者,是空解脱门;空无空相,名无相解脱门;若无相者,则无愿求,名无愿解脱门」。这表明「无相」是对「空」的进一步深化,不仅了知诸法皆空,更不执著于「空」的相状(即空无空相),由此才能达到对相无所求的「无愿」状态。

2. 与「非内、非外」的对应关系

《大方等大集经》将无相解脱门与「非内」相对应。经中指出,菩提之体非作非相,非内非外。其中「非内」指「无所造作」与「非身口意业」,对应「无相解脱门」;而「非外」指「无所觉知」与「非三业缘」,对应「空解脱门」。

3. 与「魔境界」与「佛境界」的关系

《大宝积经》指出,执著于「我、我所」即是魔境界,而通过无相解脱门了知自性空、远离男女等相,达到「无我我所」的状态,则是诸佛如来的境界。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《大宝积经》论三解脱门之关系: 「一切诸法空者,是空解脱门;空无空相,名无相解脱门;若无相者,则无愿求,名无愿解脱门。」 2. 《大方等大集经》论「非内」与无相之关系: 「非内者,无所造作,非身口意业,是名无相解脱门;非外者,无所觉知,非三业缘,是名空解脱门。」 3. 《大方等大集经》论无相解脱门之直接观法: 「观一切法无生无灭,是名得无相解脱门。」

By SutraAI-generated

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《寶積部·大寶積經》菩提流志譯本對「無相解脫門」的論述,集中體現於一段反覆出現的固定法義框架中,可從以下數端加以歸納。

一、三解脫門的遞進界說 此經以「空→無相→無願」的次第界定三解脫門:「一切諸法空者,是空解脫門。空無空相,名無相解脫門。若無於相則無願求,名無願解脫門」。此一表述在本段經文中反覆出現十餘次,構成論述無相解脫門的核心架構。其要點在於:空解脫門以諸法空寂為所觀,無相解脫門則進而離「空」之相亦不立,故名無相。

二、功能定位為「涅槃先道」 經文明言「一切法皆具三解脫門,與空共行涅槃先道,遠離於相、遠離願求,究竟涅槃界,決定如法界,周遍虛空際」,將無相解脫門定性為趣向究竟涅槃的前行法道,且遍具於一切法中。

三、以「自性離」「體性空」會通空義 此經以「自性離」「體性空」作為空性的具體表述,列舉後識、緣、業、死、初識、受、受生、世間、涅槃、起、壞等法皆「自性離故」「體性空」,由此成立「一切諸法皆悉空寂」之總相,此即「空無空相」之所以可能的根據。

四、在破除業報主體執著上的具體運用 此段經文環繞「後識滅→初識生」的生死流轉而展開,以種種夢喻(夢中共鬪、夢鬼所嬈、夢見捨色、夢聞惡聲、夢聞捨聲、夢舌根壞、夢身根壞、夢飢得食、夢鼻根壞、夢幻師幻作五欲、夢大水漂蕩、夢飲酒惛醉等) 類比凡夫對業報的執著,繼而宣說:「作業果報皆不失壞,無有作業者、無有受報者,但隨世俗故有,非第一義」。在世俗諦中業果不失,在第一義中能作所作皆空、無相可立——此正是無相解脫門在破除業報主體執著上的落實。

五、證悟境界的點示 另有「已得解脫門,無有解脫者,煩惱本亦無,佛見真實性」一偈,從行者所證之境指出:雖入解脫門而實無「得解脫者」之相可得,煩惱本來即空,此與「空無空相」之理前後呼應。

術語方面,本經以「解脫門」為標準用詞(而非單用「解脫」),以「空、無相、無願」為三解脫門之次第名稱;用「體性空」「自性離」表述空性;以「世俗」與「第一義」區分二諦層次;以「涅槃先道」標明三解脫門趣向涅槃之功能。這些術語組合構成本經論述無相解脫門的獨特表述形式。

大方等大集經T0397 · 大集部

《大方等大集經》(北涼曇無讖譯)對「無相解脫門」之論述,主要有以下幾個層面:

一、與「非內非外」之配對:本經釋菩提之體為「非內非外」,並以解脫門配之——「非內者,無相解脫門;非外者,空解脫門」。即以「無所造作」為非內,配無相解脫門;以「無所覺知」為非外,配空解脫門。此獨特之配對方式為本經所特有。

二、術語用詞:本經以「陰」代「蘊」(如「五陰」、「陰入界法」),以「入」代「處」(如「眼界、色界、眼識界,乃至意界、法界、意識界」);三解脫門之名稱為「無願解脫門」、「無相解脫門」、「空解脫門」,且經云比丘能攝心者「得八十諸三昧門」。

三、三解脫門之觀行次第:經以「修莊嚴」之觀法貫穿三門之解說。觀過去身見身者為無願解脫門;「觀過去身已,唯見於心而不見身」者為無相解脫門;「亦不見作及以作者」者為空解脫門;觀受心法亦如是。

四、以「無生無滅」為無相之核心:經云「觀一切法無生無滅,是名得無相解脫門」。

五、由心觀而入無相:「若觀無有入定之心,而得遠離一切煩惱,無因緣故煩惱不生,是名遠離見於心心得無相解脫門」——以心無主、無入、無能遠離之觀察而立無相。其前行為空解脫門(觀察是心,無有心主無出入者),故此處三門於心觀中亦成次第。

六、與涅槃之關聯:經以「若一切行畢竟盡者即是涅槃,非過去未來現在」之文,配合「是名莊嚴無相解脫門」,顯示無相解脫門之觀成即契合涅槃之見,須陀洹乃至阿羅漢皆同見此涅槃。

七、修得無相之功德:阿若憍陳如問蓮華陀羅尼時,佛言「得無相解脫門者,皆能斷諸煩惱,七返常受人天之身,雖在欲界不為欲污,諸天世人常所恭敬」。

綜觀本經,無相解脫門之詮釋兼具三個側面:其一,於體性上與「非內」之無所造作相配;其二,於觀法上以「唯見於心而不見身」、「觀一切法無生無滅」、「心無入定」而立;其三,於果德上與斷煩惱、超欲界相應。

大智度論T1509 · 釋經論部

《大智度論》論述「無相解脫門」,主要將其置於空、無相、無作三解脫門的體系中加以闡明。第一,三門的轉進與一體關係。論以涅槃城三門為喻:觀諸法空是「空」;於空中不可取相,是時空轉名「無相」;無相中不應有所作為三界生,是時無相轉名「無作」。若人入空門取相得空,此門對其已塞;若除空相,則從無相門入;若於無相復生戲論,則轉入無作門。論中亦由修觀空而起取空相之過,指出應轉學無相門以滅取空相;若於無相中生戲論,復應思惟隨空、無相行而入無作解脫門。 第二,攝受的根機。論明言:見多者為說空解脫門,愛多者為說無作解脫門,愛、見等者為說無相解脫門,顯示三門施設乃應眾生煩惱偏重而立。 第三,與聲聞法的差別。論並列阿毘曇義與摩訶衍義:阿毘曇中,空緣苦諦攝五眾,無相解脫門緣一法(所謂數緣盡),無作緣三諦攝五眾;摩訶衍中,三解脫門同緣諸法實相,以此觀世間即是涅槃。又說菩薩唯住三解脫門,不以餘法為要,三解脫門是實法,餘四念處等雖實皆方便說,三解脫門近涅槃,能攝一切實善法。 第四,實性之標舉。論云:「十方諸佛皆說無相解脫門,諸法無相相是為實」,強調無相之究竟性。又以「離一切相三昧」直指為無相解脫門相應之三昧,與「離一切著三昧」相連,明其定學面相。 第五,以「不生不滅」詮無相。論明言「不生不滅,是無相解脫門」,並以此為學不增不減之因緣。 第六,證入之相。須菩提「住無相門中入道」,故於斷煩惱得道時,於五眾乃至道果皆無所取、亦無所得。 另,佛以法眼知某眾生隨空、某隨無相、某隨無作解脫門入涅槃,亦見此門於聖道階位之施設。 術語方面:此論始終以「無相解脫門」為正稱,三門合稱「三解脫門」,未見其他異譯名;第三門此論用「無作」,而非部分經論所用之「無願」;於阿毘曇義中以「數緣盡」對應此門;又以「離一切相三昧」明其定相。

Related