Dharma · AI Companion

三解脫門

trivimokṣamukha

空、无相、无愿三种解脱法门。AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span II · emptiness ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

初立第二重:空/无相/无愿三门以破自性执趣入解脱,是声闻与般若共行的观门;究竟第四重〔大乘:三三昧缘实相,《大智度论》以三解脱门直入实相,无相无愿即离言之涅槃门〕。kind 取「法门/观行」主用法,其空义内容亦可作见地佐证。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

The path of Buddhist practice is vast, but all its myriad methods eventually converge toward a singular destination: liberation. Yet, how does one actually cross the threshold from suffering into ultimate freedom? The Buddha did not offer a physical gateway, but rather a profound cognitive and existential transformation known as the **Three Doors of Liberation (三解脫門 - *San Jietuo Men*)**.

This is not a list of abstract philosophical terms. It is the core blueprint for attaining Nirvana, utilized by Sravakas (voice-hearers), Pratyekabuddhas (solitary realizers), and Bodhisattvas alike to sever delusions, realize truth, and, in the case of the Mahayana path, mature all sentient beings. Let us walk through this concept step by step, grounding its profound depths in our modern reality.

What This Concept is About (这个概念在说什么)

The Three Doors of Liberation—also referred to in the sutras as the Three Gates of Deliverance (三脫門 - *San Tuo Men*) or Emptiness, Signlessness, and Wishlessness (空無相願 - *Kong Wuxiang Yuan*)—operate both as a sequence of realization and as concurrent truths regarding the nature of reality. To understand them accurately, we must look at how the classical texts define each "door" by examining our fundamental human experience, such as our visual perception (the eye-faculty / 眼入 - *Yan Ru*) and the five aggregates (五陰 - *Wu Yin*, the early translation for the physical and mental components of our existence).

1. **The Door of Emptiness (空解脫門 - *Kong Jietuo Men*)**: The classical definition states that the inherent nature of all phenomena, such as our eye-faculty and its objects, is ultimately silent and empty (體性畢竟空寂). Emptiness here does not mean "nothingness" or a vacuum. It means observing the aggregates and elements (陰入界空) and seeing that they are completely formed by dependent origination (十二因緣空). Because they are dependent on conditions, you can find no independent "creator" or "actor" behind them (作者無身、身無作者). There is no solid, unchanging "self" running the show.

2. **The Door of Signlessness (無相解脫門 - *Wuxiang Jietuo Men*)**: When you realize that the inherent nature of a phenomenon is empty, you naturally see that this emptiness is free from any fixed, permanent characteristics or "signs" (此空遠離眼入之相). We constantly slap conceptual labels (signs) onto reality: "good," "bad," "me," "mine." Signlessness is the realization that these labels are illusions. The practitioner observes the past body and sees only the mind, observing that all conditioned phenomena are ultimately exhausted, neither truly arising nor ceasing (諸行畢竟盡、無生無滅).

3. **The Door of Wishlessness / Aimlessness (無願解脫門 - *Wuyuan Jietuo Men*)**: If a phenomenon is empty, and it has no real, graspable characteristics (signs), then what is there to seek, desire, or wish for? (於相無所求). The practitioner clearly sees that all conditioned things are impermanent, steeped in suffering, and devoid of self. Recognizing that the future is just as empty and signless as the past and present, the practitioner drops all desperate craving and expectation for future outcomes (未來世諸行未出).

The Bodhisattva's Unique Mastery: The Armor and the Vessel While all liberated beings pass through these doors, the Mahayana sutras emphasize a breathtaking difference in how Bodhisattvas handle them. A Bodhisattva achieves a state where they "dwell in the three liberations but do not enter the definitive state of Nirvana" (住三解脫不入正位).

To explain this, the *Mahāvaipulya Mahāsannipāta Sūtra* uses two striking metaphors that perfectly map the concept: * The Metaphor of the Vajra Armor (金剛鎧喻): Emptiness, Signlessness, and Wishlessness act as an indestructible armor. The Bodhisattva wears this armor to walk straight through the raging fires of birth, death, and suffering to save others. Because of this armor, they are not burned by the afflictions of the world, nor do they retreat in fear to prematurely grab the personal escape (Nirvana) of the lesser vehicles. * The Metaphor of the Dyeing Vessel (染器喻): The Three Doors of Liberation are like a single vessel holding a rich dye. Practitioners of the three vehicles (Sravakas, Pratyekabuddhas, Bodhisattvas) are like different fabrics—wool, cotton, and fine silk. They are all dipped into the exact same vessel of liberation (法界性無差別 - no difference in the nature of the Dharma realm), but because of the varying depths of their vows and merit, they absorb the dye differently, resulting in vastly different capacities. The Buddha emerges able to know the minds of all beings and subdue all demons, while the Sravaka merely experiences a limited, personal peace.

A Life Walkthrough (生活里的走查)

To truly grasp these classical definitions, let us walk them through a very familiar contemporary scenario: workplace burnout and the toxic boss.

Imagine you are commuting home after another exhausting overtime shift. Your mind is looping: *"My boss is a tyrant. This job is a dead end. I am miserable. If I can just survive until I get that promotion, or if I can just quit and move to the countryside, I'll finally be happy."*

Let’s apply the Three Doors exactly as defined:

* Step 1: Emptiness (空) Currently, you view "the tyrant boss" and "the miserable you" as solid, independent entities. *Emptiness* asks you to look at the convergence of conditions (the aggregates / *Wu Yin*). The "boss" is a collection of genetic predispositions, their own immense pressures from upper management, and temporary emotional states. Your "misery" is a reaction based on your physical exhaustion and psychological conditioning. There is no independent "creator" of this suffering (作者無身). The inherent nature of this workplace dynamic is silent and conditional (體性畢竟空寂). * *Common Error to Avoid:* People think emptiness means "My job doesn't exist, so I'll just stare at the wall." No. The conditions exist, but their *independent reality* is empty. You still do your work, but without the agonizing weight of a solid "ego" fighting a solid "enemy."

* Step 2: Signlessness (無相) Because the situation is just a fluid convergence of conditions, the label—the "sign" (相)—of "Tyrant Boss" or "Dead-End Job" is a mental construct you are projecting. By observing your mind, you realize these phenomena are constantly shifting; they are "exhausted, neither arising nor ceasing" in their true nature. The boss was in a good mood yesterday, bad today. You are clinging to a frozen snapshot. * *Common Error to Avoid:* Signlessness does not mean you become stupid or unable to distinguish right from wrong in the office. It means you stop being hypnotized by the rigid caricatures your brain creates. You interact with reality as it unfolds, not with the "signs" you've plastered over it.

* Step 3: Wishlessness (無願) Since the solid "self" and the solid "job" are empty, and their fixed labels are illusions, what exactly are you desperately craving? You realize that pinning your entire happiness on a future promotion or a future escape to the countryside is a delusion (於相無所求). You see that all conditioned futures are just as impermanent as the present. * *Common Error to Avoid:* People map this to modern "lying flat" (躺平) or apathy. But remember the Bodhisattva's Vajra Armor! Wishlessness doesn't mean you stop working. It means you stop working *out of desperate craving for a future illusion*. You do your job impeccably right now, fully engaged, but entirely free from the anxiety of the outcome. You are liberated in the midst of the spreadsheet.

Why Contemporary People Need It (当代人为什么需要它)

We live in an era defined by algorithmic capture and the relentless manufacturing of desire. Social media, targeted ads, and consumer culture are meticulously designed to exploit what the *Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra* calls the "continuity of consciousness" (識相續 - *Shi Xiangxu*).

The sutra points out that fools are bound to endless wandering because of Greed, Anger, Ignorance (the Three Poisons), and a craving for the future, which creates an endless loop of consciousness. Today, an algorithm serves you an anger-inducing post (constructing a "sign"), triggering your outrage (solidifying the "self"), and immediately offers a product or a new ideology to soothe you (manufacturing a "wish"). Our attention spans are trapped in a high-speed wheel of grasping at signs and making wishes.

Contemporary neuroscience explains this as dopamine loops and the brain's predictive coding—our constant need to anticipate and control the future. However, while science explains the *mechanism* of our anxiety, the Dharma provides the ultimate *ontological cure*. The Three Doors of Liberation don't just ask you to manage your dopamine; they cut the very root of the illusion. When you use the Three Doors to sever the "three converging conditions" (三和合緣), the algorithmic grip on your mind simply dissolves, because there is no target left for it to grab.

Furthermore, the Mahayana teachings offer a profoundly healing perspective on our modern mental health struggles: **Non-Duality (不二 - *Buer*)**. The sutras state that it is a deception to think the Three Poisons (Greed, Anger, Ignorance) and the Three Doors of Liberation are different. The very true nature of your modern anxiety, anger, and burnout *is* emptiness, signlessness, and wishlessness (貪恚癡的實性即是空無相願). You do not need to violently go to war with your own mind to find peace. By simply recognizing the empty nature of your afflictions, they lose their power to arise (煩惱無從生起).

Common Misreadings and Clarifications (常见误读与澄清)

Even among seasoned practitioners, this concept is often flattened or distorted. Let us use the classical texts to set the boundaries straight:

* Misreading 1: Emptiness means Nihilism. * *Clarification:* When the sutras speak of Emptiness, they specify *Yin-Ru-Jie Kong* (陰入界空 - the emptiness of aggregates, faculties, and elements), *Truth Emptiness*, and *Dependent Origination Emptiness*. It is the denial of *inherent existence*, not the denial of *phenomenal reality*. To say "nothing matters" is a destructive form of grasping at the "sign" of nothingness. True emptiness embraces the vivid, functioning world.

* Misreading 2: Signlessness means becoming numb to the world. * *Clarification:* The *Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra* describes the realization of the Three Liberations as resting in one's own self-realization (緣自覺觀察住), thoroughly abandoning the dualistic views of "existence and non-existence" (離有無事見相). It is the ultimate state of lucid clarity, not the dullness of a stone. You see the world more clearly than ever because you aren't looking through the dirty lens of your own projections.

* Misreading 3: Wishlessness means you can never set a goal. * *Clarification:* If Wishlessness meant never doing anything, the Bodhisattva path would not exist. Remember the core Mahayana doctrine: Bodhisattvas use the Three Doors to *return to the world* and mature sentient beings (以三解脫門而去,故受生而來). They set immense vows (like saving all beings), but these are *pure vows* grounded in reality, not ego-driven *wishes* grounded in craving.

* Misreading 4: The Ultimate Truth is the Three Doors. * *Clarification:* In a beautiful display of Buddhist dialectics, the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* reminds us that while the Buddha teaches the Three Doors as the path to Nirvana, from the standpoint of the absolute Ultimate Truth (第一義諦), there is actually "no emptiness, no signlessness, and no wishlessness" (無空無無相無無願). The doors themselves are medicine for a disease. Once the disease of clinging is cured, you do not carry the medicine bottle around. You simply live, free and awake, like a bird leaving no trace in the sky (如鳥飛空界).

Canonical EntryAI-generated

1. 定义与核心要义

「三解脱门」(梵语:trīṇi vimokṣamukhāni),又称「三脱门」、「三空解脱门」或「空无相愿」,是佛教中通往涅槃解脱的三种核心法门。其具体内涵以「眼入」为例:眼入的体性毕竟空寂即是「空」;此空远离眼入之相即是「无相」;于相无所求即是「无愿」,此三者即是「三空解脱门」。推及一切诸法,一切法皆悉空寂,空即是「空解脱门」;空无空相即是「无相解脱门」;无相则无愿求,即是「无愿解脱门」。一切法皆具此三解脱门,与空共行,是通往涅槃的先导。

在具体修持中,修行者通过观察身心来修习三解脱门: 1. 无愿解脱门:修行者观过去身,观身见身;或观一切行不出不灭、去来无所至;或观未来世诸行未出。若能见一切法无作受者、唯见无常苦无我,亦得无愿解脱门。 2. 无相解脱门:修行者观过去身已,唯见于心而不见身;或观诸行毕竟尽、无生无灭,此毕竟尽非有为亦非无为,即是无相解脱门。 3. 空解脱门:修行者观过去身已,不见作与作者(作者无身、身无作者);或观诸行毕竟尽即空因缘。若能观「阴入界空、谛空、实空、十二因缘空、性空」,即是修空三昧,得空解脱门。

2. 主要阐述

三解脱门在《大宝积经》、《大方等大集经》与《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》中皆有深入阐述,展现出多个修行与实证的维度:

* 菩萨的实践与「住三解脱不入正位」:大乘菩萨在修持三解脱门时,展现出独特的行相。菩萨能以「三脱门」过于四禅,但其自在并非仅在于「证」三解脱,而是在于能「解了」三解脱。菩萨的独特之处在于「住三解脱不入正位」,虽证得三解脱,却「如鸟飞空界」,在未具足一切功德前终不入涅槃。他们能以「三解脱门而去,故受生而来」,借此成熟众生。此外,证得三脱门且不住三界,被定义为真正的「沙门业」。

* 大乘不二法门与烦恼调伏:《大方等大集经》提出,若认为「三毒」(贪瞋痴)与「三解脱门」有异,即是诳惑如来。因为「空、无相、无愿」的本质,即是贪欲、瞋恚、愚痴的实性,两者无二无别。空、无相、无愿能调伏一切诸法,若了知诸法本性空寂、无相、不可愿,则贪瞋痴等烦恼便无从生起。不眴菩萨指出,空无相愿是不可住的,而正是在这「无所住」之处,菩萨得以成就三昧,契入圣解脱。

* 断除心识相续与实证境界:《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》强调「三解脱」是断除生命与心识相续的关键。愚夫因贪、恚、痴及对未来的爱喜而有五趣相续,并因「三和合缘」作方便计着,导致「识相续无间生」。若能断除这「三和合缘识」,便能「见三解脱」,使一切相续不再升起。证得「三解脱」的实证境界,就如同「如实印所印」一般,修行者能在「性自性」中获得「缘自觉观察住」,彻底远离关于「有无事」的见相。在论及「智慧不得」的深奥义理时,佛陀指出,觉知自心现量,了知有无、外性非性,此时智对于外境是不可得的。正因为不可得,智在所知境(尔炎)中不生。在这种「顺三解脱」的状态下,「智亦不得」。

* 声闻与如来解脱的同异:声闻与如来皆有三解脱门,在法界性上实无差别。然而,由于证悟的深浅与功德不同,两者有极大差异:如来处之受无量乐,能降伏魔众、了知众生心念;声闻处之仅受有量乐,且入法界时甚至自不知觉。通达三解脱门的菩萨,能于甚深法不惊不怖,从而超越魔界。

* 经典中的生动比喻:《大方等大集经》中对此有两个生动比喻: 1. 金刚铠喻:将「空无相愿」比作金刚铠甲。菩萨观一切法空无相愿,如同身穿金刚铠穿过生死猛火,既不为诸行之火所烧,亦能不退大乘、不提前证取二乘道果。 2. 染器喻:将「空无相愿」比作盛放染料的同一个器皿。声闻、缘觉、菩萨三乘人如同毳、叠、憍奢耶衣,虽在同一个器皿中受染,但因质地不同而呈现不同的色泽(即证得不同的菩提)。

3. 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在术语使用与法相译名上,各经呈现出明显的差异: * 术语名称的多样性: * 《大宝积经》:使用「三解脱门」、「三脱门」、「三空解脱门」、「空无相愿」及「空无相无愿三解脱门」。 * 《大方等大集经》:使用「三解脱门」、「三脱门」、「三解脱」、直接合称为「空无相愿」,或拆分表述为「一者、修空;二者、无相;三者、无愿」。 * 《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》:统一使用「三解脱」这一术语形式。 * 五蕴/五阴等法相译名: * 《大宝积经》:明确使用「五阴」而非「五蕴」(如「五阴无常」)。 * 《大方等大集经》:多处使用「阴入界」或「阴界入」等术语。 * 《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》:采用「阴」来称呼「蕴」(如「异相诸阴和合积聚」)。

4. 与相关概念的关系

* 与戒律、平等法的关系:若能入三解脱门,如实觉知而不分别思念,即是「受正平等戒」。三解脱门与如、法性、实际一同被称为「白净平等」。 * 与第一义谛的超越性:虽然世尊常说入三解脱门名为涅槃,但在究竟实相的第一义谛中,则是「无空无无相无无愿」。修行者若能于空、无相、无愿中得三解脱,便能降伏魔怨。 * 与五无间业的重新诠释:在重新诠释「五无间业」的内在含意时,将「三解脱」与断除心识相联系。所谓「恶心出佛身血」,是指众生因不能觉知外在的自相与共相,在自心现量的七识身中,以「三解脱无漏恶想」,究竟断除这七种识佛。而对于一般的「外无间」罪行,行持者则会在「三解脱」中,一一都无法获得无间等法。

5. 代表性原文引用

* 《大宝积经》:「眼入体性毕竟空寂即是空;此空远离眼入之相即是无相;于相无所求即是无愿,此三者即是三空解脱门。」 * 《大宝积经》:「一切法皆悉空寂,空即是空解脱门;空无空相即是无相解脱门;无相则无愿求,即是无愿解脱门。」 * 《大方等大集经》:「若能观阴入界空、谛空、实空、十二因缘空、性空,即是修空三昧,得空解脱门。」 * 《楞伽阿跋多罗宝经》:「得三解脱,如如实印所印,于性自性得缘自觉观察住,离有无事见相。」

By SutraAI-generated

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

本經中論及「三解脫門」之段落,見於佛在舍衛國祇樹給孤獨園時對諸比丘之教說。以下就本經對此概念之論述內涵、術語形式與教說特色,加以歸納整理。

一、作為次第法門之一項而施設。經中世尊告諸比丘:「若有一人出現於世,便有一人入道在於世間,亦有二諦、三解脫門、四諦真法、五根、六邪見滅、七覺意、賢聖八道品、九眾生居、如來十力、十一慈心解脫,便出現於世。」此段以「一人出現於世」為前提,隨即以二、三、四、五、六、七、八、九、十、十一之數字次第,依次鋪陳十項法門。三解脫門即居於第二項之位,緊隨二諦之後而施設,顯示本經將其視為如來正法施設中不可缺之法要之一。此種以數字遞進方式羅列法門之形式,為本經「增壹」命名之所由來,亦為該經施設教法之慣用結構特色。

二、與如來出世之因緣關聯。經中所謂「一人」,具體所指為「多薩阿竭、阿羅呵、三耶三佛」——此即如來之異譯名號組合,乃以三號並舉之方式稱歎佛之無上德。本經將三解脫門之施設,與如來出世直接繫屬,強調此法門之出現乃以如來示現世間為其因緣,並非凡夫所能施設之世間法。此種論述方式,凸顯三解脫門在佛教整體修行解脫體系中之根本地位,亦揭示如來出世之本懷即在施設如此次第之正法。

三、術語形式與用詞。本段所用之核心術語為「三解脫門」,並未在本塊原文中具體開列空、無相、無願之三個別名相。本經此處使用「三解脫門」之複合詞形式,與其他阿含部經典中所見之名稱相一致,未見特殊之異譯、別稱或倒置結構。經文雖標示「三解脫門」之概念名目,但於此段中僅以總數之名出之,而不逐一列舉其個別內涵,此一施設方式顯示本段重在總相之列舉,而非別相之詳釋。

四、勸修之意與教說性質。經末世尊勸誡諸比丘:「是故,諸比丘!常興恭敬於如來所,亦當作是學。」此勸誡將三解脫門等法門之施設,與對如來之恭敬心及依法修行之實踐緊密連結,顯示本經不僅在名相上施設此等法門,更強調行者應依之起修,方能與如來出世之因緣相應,不令此等出世正法徒具空名。末云「爾時,諸比丘聞佛所說,歡喜奉行」,可知此段教說乃世尊當時對在座大眾之直接教授,旨在引導比丘對如來所施設之次第法門生起信受恭敬之心,並落實於日常修行之中。

大方廣佛華嚴經(八十華嚴)T0279 · 華嚴部

《八十華嚴》論「三解脫門」,所用術語即「空解脫門、無相解脫門、無願解脫門」,合稱「三解脫門」。本經並非孤立宣說此三門,而是將其置於菩薩觀十二緣起(十二有支)的脈絡中加以闡明。

依所載,菩薩以十種相觀諸緣起,所謂「有支相續故、一心所攝故、自業差別故、不相捨離故、三道不斷故、觀過去現在未來故、三苦聚集故、因緣生滅故、生滅繫縛故、無所有盡觀故」,進而「知無我、無人、無壽命、自性空、無作者、無受者,即得空解脫門現在前」——以了知自性空而入空解脫門;次「觀諸有支皆自性滅,畢竟解脫,無有少法相生,即時得無相解脫門現在前」——以觀諸法畢竟不生而入無相解脫門;後「如是入空、無相已,無有願求,唯除大悲為首,教化眾生,即時得無願解脫門現在前」——以離願求、唯以大悲度生而入無願解脫門。三門次第為空、無相、無願,文中並標各門皆「現在前」。此段結云:「菩薩如是修三解脫門,離彼、我想,離作者、受者想,離有、無想」,明修三門之果在於遠離我、作者、受者及有無之種種執想。

則將三解脫門繫於乘之出生:「知三解脫門出生聲聞乘,證無諍法出生獨覺乘」,明三解脫門為聲聞乘所依之法;同段復載菩薩住兜率天為諸天說法勸發菩提心,與出世解脫法相呼應。

論菩薩住處之功德,特別標明「雖入三解脫門而不取聲聞解脫」,又「雖觀甚深緣起而不住究竟寂滅」、「雖修八聖道而不求永出世間」、「雖超凡夫地而不墮聲聞辟支佛地」,凸顯菩薩雖修三解脫門,卻能不取小乘解脫之果、不滯於究竟寂滅、不墮二乘之地。此即本經論三解脫門之獨特側面——以大乘無住之行貫通三門,與二乘取證有別。

綜合而言,本經論三解脫門之要點有三:一、以觀十二緣起為入三門之所依;二、依次明示三門「現在前」之因及所遣之執(我想、作者受者想、有無想);三、強調菩薩雖入三門而不取聲聞解脫,唯以大悲為首、廣度眾生,凸顯其不共二乘之處。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

大寶積經(唐菩提流志譯)對三解脫門之論述,隨文脈而有不同側重,茲歸納如下。

一、術語形式與定式教說 本經恆以「三解脫門」或略稱「三脫門」標舉此一概念,並與「空、無相、無願」三法並列;卷中亦用「空無相願」之連稱形式。又見「空無相無願三解脫門」全名並舉以明菩薩之行持。經中反覆出現一定之教說公式:「一切諸法空者是空解脫門,空無空相名無相解脫門,若無相者則無願求名無願解脫門」(chunk:17950, 17953, 17955, 17965, 17967, 17969, 17970)。此公式隨六入逐一演繹,每段皆以「一切法皆具三解脫門,與空共行涅槃先道,遠離於相、遠離願求,究竟涅槃界,決定如法界,周遍虛空際」作結。

二、以三解脫遍入一一根塵 經詳明於眼入中三解脫門之建立:「眼入之體性畢竟空寂,前際後際皆不可得」;「此眼入相不可得,是故此眼入體性空寂。此空離於眼入相是名無相,於相無求故名無願」,標此為「於眼入中三空解脫門現在前」。此逐根演繹之法,顯示三解脫門非別有他法,乃一一根塵當體空寂之顯現。

三、菩薩不以證三解脫為究竟——最具本經特色之論述 本經明辨菩薩與二乘之不同,卷中云:「菩薩非以證三解脫故名得自在,菩薩解了三解脫故名為自在」。菩薩不因自證三解脫而入涅槃為究竟,乃以解了此三解脫而能為眾生承擔、攝化故名自在。此與偈頌「雖證三解脫,如鳥飛空界,未具諸功德,終不入涅槃」相呼應,強調大乘菩薩雖遊踐三解脫而不取涅槃之獨特行願。

四、證三解脫而不住三界、不入正位 本經常以三解脫門配言不住之智行:「證三脫門不住三界」、「住三解脫不入正位」;又以「三解脫門而去,故受生而來」明菩薩來去之道——出三界以三解脫為門,入生死以受生為用。

五、三解脫等同正等戒 另有一獨特側面:經以三解脫門為正等戒之本質,謂「空是平等、無相是平等、無願是平等」;「入三解脫門,如實覺知,不分別不思念,於一切法無有退轉」,是名「受正平等戒」。

六、以三解脫為佛語、為境界 如來具「淨三解脫語」,如來神變有「於一味中說三解脫,開示諸法空無相願」。詩句云:「三解脫門為境界,佛十力牙是王子」、「於空無相及無願,得三解脫降魔怨」。復有「以三脫門過於四禪」,以三解脫門超越四禪之定。

至於三解脫門亦列於廣大助菩提法數之中:「四念處、四正勤、四如意足、四禪、五根、五力、七覺意、八聖道、止觀、明、解脫、三解脫門、盡智、無生智,是名為法」。

Related