Dharma · AI Companion

邪定

mithyāsamādhi

与邪见相应且不趣解脱的定。AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

这个概念在说什么 (What This Concept Means)

In the architecture of Buddhist liberation, concentration (*samādhi* / 定) is not inherently wholesome or liberating by itself. Immersion is merely a mental faculty—the capacity of the mind to unify, focus, and sustain attention upon an object (*cittasya ekāgratā* / 心一境性). When this powerful mental engine is ignited by ignorance, guided by distorted views, and fueled by subtle attachment or aversion, it becomes Wrong Concentration (*mithyā-samādhi* / 邪定) [15289].

Within the foundational teachings of the *Samyukta Āgama* (雜阿含經) and the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (大寶積經), *mithyā-samādhi* occupies a precise and dangerous position. It is the final link in the "Eightfold Wrongness" (八邪支) and one of the "Ten Unwholesome Factors" (十邪性, *daśa mithyātvāni*) [15289]. It represents the ultimate consolidation of delusion: a state where the mind is intensely focused, tranquil, or absorbed, yet completely anchored in unwholesome states (*akusaladhammā* / 不善法) [7792].

To understand *mithyā-samādhi* deeply, one must grasp its position in the entire path to liberation (*vimukti-mārga* / 解脱道):

1. The Causality of the Path: How Wrong Concentration Awakens

Concentration does not arise in a vacuum; it is the downstream output of a whole cognitive and ethical pipeline. The sutras explicitly lay down the sequential genesis: > *“He who holds Wrong View gives rise to Wrong Thought; Wrong Thought leads to Wrong Speech, Wrong Action, Wrong Livelihood, Wrong Effort, Wrong Mindfulness, and ultimately Wrong Concentration.”* [7810]

* **The Root (邪見 / *mithyā-dṛṣṭi*)**: A fundamental misapprehension of reality—such as believing in a permanent self, denying cause and effect (*karma*), or viewing meditative absorption as an ultimate refuge. * **The Internal Engine (不正思惟 / *ayoniśo manasikāra*)**: Unwise reflection or inappropriate attention. Improper reflection nurtures unarisen *mithyā-samādhi* and causes existing wrong concentration to multiply and expand [7778]. * **The External Factor (惡知識 / *pāpamitta*)**: Association with harmful companions, toxic teachers, or misguiding influences that reinforce false views [7784].

2. Definition and Structural Contrast: Right vs. Wrong Concentration

*Right Concentration* (*samyag-samādhi* / 正定) is defined as "unshaken, firm, gathered, tranquil, and unified mind" (*住心不亂、堅固、攝持、寂止、三昧、一心*) cultivated on the foundation of Right View and moral discipline, aimed at the severance of greed, hatred, and delusion [7796].

Conversely, *mithyā-samādhi* is defined across canonical texts through stark polarities: * The Stream: Right concentration is the "upstream path" (*逆流道*, against samsaric habituation), "superior path" (*勝道*), and "higher path" (*上道*). Wrong concentration is the "downstream path" (*順流道*), "regressive path" (*退道*), and "inferior path" (*下道*) [7823]. * The Shore: Right concentration leads to the "other shore" (*彼岸*, Nirvāṇa), whereas wrong concentration is "non-other-shore" (*非彼岸*) [7770]. * Nature: It is designated as "unlawful" (*非法*), "non-noble" (*非聖*), "black dharma" (*黑法*), "culpable" (*有罪法*), and "that which must be abandoned" (*應去法*) [7792].

3. The Metaphor of the Bitter Seed

The *Samyukta Āgama* provides an exact canonical metaphor for *mithyā-samādhi*: If a person plants the seed of a bitter melon or poisonous fruit in fertile earth, no matter how much water, sunlight, and fertilizer are supplied, every fruit, leaf, and sprout harvested from it will be undeniably bitter [7810].

Similarly, when an individual engages in deep focus or meditative absorption anchored in Wrong View (*mithyā-dṛṣṭi*), all bodily actions, speech, intentions, desires, and aspirational efforts that flow from that state inevitably yield "unpleasant, disagreeable, and unlovely fruits" (*不愛、不念、不可意果*) [7810]. The power of concentration acts merely as water and fertilizer—it accelerates and amplifies the underlying bitter seed.

4. Advanced Nuances: "Unwholesome Samādhi" and "Inverted Liberation"

In the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra*, the text touches upon deeper, nuanced layers: * Inverted Liberation (倒解脫): When practitioners engage in hyper-conceptual distortions (*邪分別*), preach misguided practices to others, and lack true skillful means (*upāya*), they fall into a state of "inverted liberation"—mistaking a subtle egoic trance or conceptual prison for real freedom [17477]. * Unwholesome Samādhi (不善三昧): The sutra introduces a paradoxical diagnostic term. If one can contemplate and clearly observe that the configurations (*ākāra* / 行相) of afflictions like greed, anger, and delusion are completely empty, illusory, and devoid of intrinsic reality (*虛妄無真實*), this precise discerning contemplation of unwholesome states is called "unwholesome samādhi"—using the term *samādhi* to describe the hyper-lucid insight that penetrates unwholesome phenomena [15091]. * **The Three Categories (*Rāśi* / 三聚)**: Sentient beings are categorized into the *Samyaktva-niyata-rāśi* (正定聚, those destined for ultimate truth), *Aniyata-rāśi* (不定聚, the indeterminate), and *Mithyātva-niyata-rāśi* (邪定聚, those firmly fixed in wrongness) [17425]. The Tathāgata, with omniscience, clearly discerns when a being is "planting the seeds of wrong concentration" (*當殖邪定種*) versus seeds of liberation [15484].


生活里的走查 (Walkthrough in Daily Life)

To see *mithyā-samādhi* clearly, we must dismantle the myth that "concentration" only happens on a meditation cushion in a secluded monastery. In modern life, intense mental single-pointedness (*cittasya ekāgratā*) occurs constantly. When that focus is driven by wrong assumptions and improper attention, *mithyā-samādhi* is operating full-force.

Let us trace how the classical chain—Wrong View $\rightarrow$ Improper Reflection $\rightarrow$ Wrong Effort/Mindfulness $\rightarrow$ Wrong Concentration—plays out in contemporary scenarios, and where modern people misidentify these states.

Scene 1: The Deep "Flow State" of Late-Night Work (Corporate / Tech)

* The Experience: A software engineer or financial analyst sits down at 10:00 PM to fix a bug or polish a deck. By 2:00 AM, hours have flown by in a flash. The world outside has vanished. Physical discomfort (neck pain, dry eyes) is entirely suppressed. The mind is absorbed, highly efficient, and hyper-focused. * The Misconception: Modern productivity culture calls this "Peak Flow" or "Deep Work" and equates it with mental health or mastery. The person thinks: *"My mind is quiet and peaceful; I am in a high-level zen state."* * The Canonical Mapping: * *Root View (邪見)*: The implicit conviction that one's ultimate worth, security, and identity depend on outperforming peers, winning corporate validation, or building an invincible professional ego. * *Internal Cause (不正思惟)*: Focusing single-mindedly on the target while remaining entirely blind to the impermanence (*anitya*) of the task, the bodily stress being ignored, and the underlying fear of failure. * *The Result (邪定)*: This focus is *mithyā-samādhi*. Because the engine driving this single-pointed focus is subtle anxiety and greed, the fruit reaped after weeks of such "flow" is burn-out, emotional numbness, irritability toward family, and deep existential dread. The "bitter seed" yields bitter fruit [7810].

Scene 2: Algorithmic Doomscrolling & Hyper-Focus on "Optimizing"

* The Experience: A person spends three hours in bed immersed in short videos, curated feeds, or online trading charts. The mind enters an uncanny stillness—thoughts of daily chores vanish, external sounds fade into background noise, and attention is locked into a tight feedback loop. * The Misconception: People assume this is just "zoning out" or "relaxing the brain." * The Canonical Mapping: * *External Factor (惡知識 / 惡伴黨)*: The algorithm acts as an automated "harmful companion" (*pāpamitta*), continuously feeding unskillful stimuli that trigger craving, outrage, or envy [7784]. * *Sequential Chain*: Craving for dopamine $\rightarrow$ Wrong Effort (swiping relentlessly) $\rightarrow$ Wrong Mindfulness (hyper-vigilance toward notifications) $\rightarrow$ Wrong Concentration (邪定). * *Why it's Wrong Concentration*: The mind is unified and absorbed, but it is absorbed in *tṛṣṇā* (craving) and *moha* (delusion). When forced out of this state, the practitioner feels agitated, exhausted, and mentally fragmented—the exact opposite of the tranquility (*śatha*) born of Right Concentration [7796].

Scene 3: The "Spiritual" Meditator Chasing Bliss or Blankness

* The Experience: A practitioner sits in meditation, learns to suppress gross thoughts, and enters a quiet, serene state where physical sensations feel floaty and thoughts drop away. They stay in this state for an hour, feeling detached from all worldly troubles. * The Misconception: The practitioner believes: *"I have attained Nirvāṇa; I am enlightened; I have transcended my emotions."* * The Canonical Mapping: * *The Trap*: This is a classic meditative *mithyā-samādhi*—often matching what the sūtras term "Inverted Liberation" (倒解脫) [17477]. * *The Error*: The practitioner has cultivated *samādhi* devoid of *vipassanā* (insight into impermanence, suffering, and non-self). They are using concentration as a psychological bunker to escape difficult relationships or negative feelings. * *The Result*: Because the root of subtle self-attachment (*ātma-dṛṣṭi*) is untouched, the moment they step off the cushion and face a difficult boss or spouse, intense anger (*dveṣa*) flares up immediately. The concentration was merely a tranquilized form of delusion.


当代人为什么需要它 (Why Modern People Need It)

In an age dominated by the attention economy, cognitive overload, and modern wellness trends, understanding *mithyā-samādhi* is a critical safeguard.

1. Decoupling "Focus Power" from "Wisdom and Ethics"

Modern culture treats "focus" as an absolute, neutral good. Apps teach us how to focus; productivity books glorify deep work; biohackers use nootropics to enter intense focus states.

However, Buddhism reminds us that focus is morally ambiguous. A sniper tracking a target, a hacker executing a cyber-heist, a trader fueled by predatory greed, and a person doomscrolling all possess high levels of mental concentration (*samādhi*). Without Right View (*samyag-dṛṣṭi*) and ethical foundation (*śīla*), high-powered focus simply turns a person into an unusually efficient generator of suffering. Recognizing *mithyā-samādhi* prevents us from worshipping raw focus as a spiritual achievement.

2. Evaluating the Limits of AI and Algorithmic Hyper-Engagement

Contemporary life is surrounded by artificial intelligence and algorithmically tailored environments designed to induce focus and immersion. AI platforms provide hyper-personalized "companionship" or endless content streams that capture human attention for hours.

Through the Buddhist lens, these systems function as automated *pāpamitta* (bad companions) that induce collective *mithyā-samādhi* [7784]. They harness human focus not to liberate the mind, but to monetize craving and delusion. Understanding this allows individuals to audit their digital habits: *Is this app bringing me closer to clarity and peace, or is it cultivating an unwholesome, addictive concentration?*

3. A Diagnostic Tool for Wellness Culture & Spiritual Deceptions

The modern explosion of mindfulness, breathwork, and neo-spiritual retreats has brought meditative techniques into the mainstream. However, many contemporary approaches strip meditation of its ethical and philosophical core, marketing it merely as stress reduction, performance optimization, or ego-enhancement.

When meditation is practiced to make one a "more formidable executive," "more emotionally impenetrable," or "blissfully detached from societal pain," it risks degenerating into *mithyā-samādhi*. The concept of *mithyā-samādhi* acts as an uncompromising mirror, forcing practitioners to ask: *What view is guiding my practice? Am I loosening my grip on selfhood, or am I building a quieter, more sophisticated ego fortress?*


常见误读与澄清 (Common Misconceptions & Clarifications)

Misconception 1: "Wrong Concentration means failing to concentrate or having a scattered mind."

* Clarification: A scattered, restless mind is called distraction / agitation (*auddhatya* / 掉舉) or lack of concentration (*samādhi-hāni*), not *mithyā-samādhi*. *Mithyā-samādhi* is *actual* concentration—the mind *is* steady, unified, and absorbed. The "wrongness" (*mithyā*) lies not in the *intensity* or *stability* of the focus, but in its underlying view, motivation, and orientation. A mind that is deeply focused on revenge or intensely absorbed in an illusion of self-permanence is experiencing *mithyā-samādhi*.

Misconception 2: "As long as I feel calm and happy during meditation, it must be Right Concentration."

* Clarification: Tranquility (*praśrabdhi*) and joy (*prīti*) can accompany both wholesome and unwholesome states of concentration. Canonical texts explicitly note that practitioners who enter refined states of absorption (such as the formless realms or deep quietude) can still be trapped in "Inverted Liberation" (倒解脫) if they cling to those peaceful states as a permanent soul or ultimate self [17477]. If peace is accompanied by subtle ignorance or detachment from reality, it is a gilded cage of *mithyā-samādhi*.

Misconception 3: "Any concentration used for secular work (like coding, art, or science) is automatically Wrong Concentration."

* Clarification: The canonical distinction hinges on the underlying cognitive pipeline (Right View vs. Wrong View; Wise Attention vs. Unwise Attention) [7778, 7810]. Engaging in intense focus to solve a medical problem, build infrastructure, or create art with a mind grounded in goodwill, honesty, and an understanding of cause-and-effect is not *mithyā-samādhi*. It becomes *mithyā-samādhi* when the underlying driver is rooted in the "three poisons" (greed, hatred, delusion)—for instance, working with hyper-focus out of malice toward a rival, or out of obsessive, toxic attachment to fame and self-aggrandizement.

Misconception 4: "Scientific studies on brainwaves (like Alpha/Gamma synchronization) prove whether a meditation state is Right or Wrong Concentration."

* Clarification: Modern neuroscience can measure neurological correlates—such as brainwave synchrony, metabolic down-regulation, or default mode network (DMN) suppression. However, science measures the physiological mechanics of focus, not its ethical or liberating orientation. A neural pattern corresponding to deep immersion in a meditator searching for non-self (*anātman*) might look neuro-biologically identical to that of a sniper locking onto a target or a cult leader immersed in a delusion of grandeur. Neuroscience cannot discern between *samyag-samādhi* and *mithyā-samādhi*, because the difference lies in spiritual wisdom (*prajñā*), ethical alignment (*śīla*), and the ultimate eradication of subtle defilements—dimensions that transcend external biometrics.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

邪定(mithyā-samādhi)是佛教修行中与“正定”相对立的错误禅定状态。在经典中,它被定位为“八邪支”的最后一支,亦是“十邪性”之一。邪定本质上属于违背正法的恶不善法,是愚痴凡夫所依止的“邪性决定聚”之一。它由邪见所引导,因不正思维与恶知识而生起、增广,最终导致修行者违背正法、退转于道,并招致不爱、不念、不可意的苦果。

二、 主要阐述

根据相关经典的论述,邪定的性质、成因、危害及本质可以从以下几个维度进行系统阐述: 1. 邪定的性质与多重定性: 在经典中,邪定被赋予了多种负面的属性与定性。首先,邪定属于“邪事”,起邪事者必然不乐正法。其次,邪定被定性为“非彼岸”,而与之相对的正定则是“彼岸”。此外,邪定等同于“非法”与“邪”,并被一系列对立术语界定为“非律”、“非圣”、“不善法”、“非习法”、“非善哉法”、“黑法”、“非义”、“卑法”、“有罪法”以及“应去法”。在修行道路上,邪定被描述为“顺流道”、“退道”与“下道”,而正定则是“逆流道”、“胜道”与“上道”。 2. 邪定的生起与熄灭因缘: 邪定的产生与消亡取决于内因、外缘以及根本见解的引导: - 内因(思惟):在内法中,“不正思惟”是关键。不正思惟能令未生的邪定生起,已生的邪定重生并增广;相反,“正思惟”则能令未生的邪定不生,已生的邪定熄灭。 - 外缘(伴党):在外法中,“恶知识、恶伴党、恶随从”是导致邪定生起与增广的外在因素;而“善知识、善伴党、善随从”则能使未生的邪定不生,已生的邪定熄灭。 - 见解引导:邪见是生起邪定的根本。邪见者会起邪志,乃至起邪定,其身业、口业、思、欲、愿、行为皆随顺邪见。 3. 邪定的危害与断除的必要性: 修行者若不起正定而起邪定,将会带来严重的后果。首先,起邪定等邪事者皆不乐正法,心向邪、向邪者,违背于法,不乐于法。其次,若不离邪定,邪定将会带来“非义不饶益苦”。邪见之人因起邪定,其一切所得皆是“不爱、不念、不可意果”,这如同将苦果种子种在地下,无论如何灌溉,其所得之味悉皆苦涩。 4. 如来对邪定的如实了知: 如来凭借其无上智慧,能够如实了知众生因不同的理解与志向(欲解)而产生的果报。如来能清楚知晓众生是否会因其当下的理解而“当殖邪定種”(种下邪定的种子)。同时,佛陀将众生分类为“正定”、“邪定”与“不定”三聚,对这三聚众生皆能决定了知,对于“邪定”众生所趋向的一切处所,亦能完全悉知。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典部类中,对于邪定及相关概念的表述存在独特的术语和侧重点: 1. 八邪支与十邪性: 《雜阿含經》将邪定置于“八邪支”的框架中,与邪见、邪志、邪语、邪业、邪命、邪方便、邪念并列。而《大寶積經》则将其扩展为“十邪性”之一,在八邪支的基础上,增加了“九者邪解脫”与“十者邪解脫智見”。 2. “不善三昧”的独特表述: 《大寶積經》中提出了一个特殊的术语“不善三昧”。经文指出,若能如实观察并了知贪、瞋、痴等种种诸烦恼的所有行相皆是“虚妄无真实”的,能够进行这样的观察,即被称为“不善三昧”。这一表述将对烦恼虚妄性的观察冠以“三昧”之名,展现了独特的禅定观。 3. “邪定聚”与“邪定种”: 《大寶積經》中,十邪性又被称为“邪性决定聚”。同时,经中将众生分为“正定”、“邪定”与“不定”三聚。在论及因果种子时,经中使用了“当殖邪定種”这一表述,用以形容因错误的理解而种下邪定的种子。 4. 倒解脱与禅定本质的虚假性: 《大寶積經》指出,若众生“行于邪分别”,并为他人宣说“邪行”,其本身迷惑深重且缺乏方便法门,这种状态被佛陀视为“倒解脱”(颠倒的解脱)。此外,该经对禅定与解脱的本质进行了根本性的揭示,指出无论是从禅定、解脱中所升起的“三摩提”(等持/三昧)与“正受”(等至),其背后不论是相应于“烦恼”还是“清净”,在究竟智慧看来,悉皆宣说为“虚假”不实。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 与“正定”的关系: 邪定与正定是完全对立的概念。正定被定义为“住心不乱、坚固、摄持、寂止、三昧、一心”,是“彼岸”、“是法”、“正”、“逆流道”、“胜道”与“上道”。而邪定则是其反面,是修行者必须断除的障碍。 2. 与“邪见”的关系: 邪见是邪定生起的根本导向。邪见者会起邪志,乃至起邪定。邪见之人的身业、口业、思、欲、愿、行为皆随顺邪见,导致其修行所得皆为苦果。 3. 与“不正思惟”与“恶知识”的关系: 不正思惟是邪定生起的内在关键因缘;恶知识、恶伴党、恶随从则是其外在因缘。相反,正思惟与善知识则是熄灭邪定的关键。 4. 与“三聚”的关系: 在众生分类中,邪定众生属于“邪定聚”,与“正定聚”、“不定聚”并列,是佛陀所如实了知并试图引导度脱的对象。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《雜阿含經》:“起邪事者不樂正法,不起邪事者樂正法。何等為邪事?謂邪見,乃至邪定。” 2. 《雜阿含經》:“邪定者是非彼岸,正定者是彼岸。” 3. 《雜阿含經》:“邪定是非法、是邪……正定是法、是正。何等為正定?謂住心不亂、堅固、攝持、寂止、三昧、一心。” 4. 《雜阿含經》:“邪見者起邪志,邪志者起邪語,邪語者起邪業,邪業者起邪命,邪命者起邪方便,邪方便者起邪念,邪念者起邪定。” 5. 《大寶積經》:“世間眾生皆因十種惡邪性故建立邪定。何等為十?一者邪見,二者邪思惟,三者邪語,四者邪業,五者邪命,六者邪精進,七者邪念,八者邪定,九者邪解脫,十者邪解脫智見。” 6. 《大寶積經》:“若能如實觀察了知貪瞋癡等諸煩惱行皆虛妄無真實者,是名不善三昧。” 7. 《大寶積經》:“如來以種種解智力,如實知彼眾生當殖邪定種,當殖正定種,當殖正定解脫種。”

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

本經(即劉宋求那跋陀羅譯《雜阿含經》)以「邪定」一詞表示與邪見相應、不趣解脫之定。邪定在經中並非孤立出現,而是與邪見、邪志、邪語、邪業、邪命、邪方便、邪念並列,合為八項,恰為八正道的「邪」之對應面。

本經對邪定的論述可從七個側面歸納:

第一,邪定屬「邪事」而非「正事」。經說在家出家若起邪事則不樂正法,起正事則樂正法;所謂邪事即「邪見,乃至邪定」,正事即「正見,乃至正定」。

第二,邪定是可斷、可離之法。經以反顯語「邪見不可斷故,我終不說應離」說明邪定亦應離、斷,並應轉修正定。

第三,邪定是「非彼岸」,非解脫所趣之處。婆羅門問及彼岸與非彼岸,佛答「邪見者非彼岸,正見者是彼岸」,乃至「邪定非彼岸,正定是彼岸」。

第四,邪定由內外二緣生起。內在因緣為不正思惟,「於內法中,我不見一法能令未生惡不善法生」,如不正思惟能令邪見乃至邪定生增;外在因緣為惡知識、惡伴黨、惡隨從,能令邪見乃至邪定生已重生。

第五,邪定歸於「非法」一邊。經以「非法、是法」「非律、正律」「非聖、是聖」「黑法、白法」「非義、正義」「卑法、勝法」「有罪、無罪法」等多對範疇並列,邪定皆屬非法。

第六,邪定為「順流道」而非「逆流道」。經明說「邪見乃至邪定」為順流、退、下之道;「正見乃至正定」為逆流、勝、上之道。

第七,邪定者違於法、不樂於法。經以苦種為喻:邪見者能起邪志乃至邪定,其身口諸業皆隨順邪,一切得「不愛、不念、不可意果」;而心向邪者即「邪見,乃至邪定」,違背於法。

由上可知,本經論「邪定」之特色有四:一、始終以「邪見乃至邪定」之連鎖形式出現,與正定形成整體對舉;二、不作正面定義,而是透過「非彼岸」「非法」「順流」「違於法」等否定性、相對性概念加以界定;三、強調邪定可由內(不正思惟)外(惡知識)兩緣生長,亦可由離、斷、修正見而對治;四、所用術語統一為「邪定」,未見其他異名。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》論「邪定」,主要從三個側面展開。

一、十種惡邪性中的邪定。經中佛告長者:「我觀世間一切眾生,皆由十種惡邪性故建立邪定」,十者即邪見、邪思惟、邪語、邪業、邪命、邪精進、邪念、邪定、邪解脫、邪解脫智見。邪定為此十惡性之一,與邪見相應,且為整套染污心行之核心環節;佛為令眾生出離如是諸邪性,以淨信心捨釋氏家趣無上道。 偈頌重宣此義,列舉「邪見、邪思惟境界、邪語、邪業、邪命、邪精進、邪念、邪定、邪解脫、邪解脫智見」十項,並以「邪性決定聚,愚夫之所依」一句統攝此類眾生——意即執著邪性、決定不移之聚類,正是愚夫所依之處;佛為令其「住正性」故趣無上道。此處經文以「邪性決定聚」一語將「邪定」與「決定聚」(確定不移之有情類)相連,揭示邪定者乃定性之邪,並非暫時性之偏差。

二、如來種種解智力所攝知的邪定。在如來十力之「種種解智力」中,經文明言:「若由此解當殖邪定種、若由此解當殖正定種、若由此解當殖正定解脫種者,是亦如來如實了知」。此處以「殖邪定種」為如來所如實知之對象,與「正定種」、「正定解脫種」並列,顯示邪定亦為可由宿解而種之業因,如來悉能了別。此用詞「邪定種」於本經為邪定之異名側面。

三、三聚分類中的邪定。經以偈頌宣說:「正定及邪定,及不定眾生,於此三聚中,佛能決定知」,將一切眾生分為正定、邪定、不定三聚,佛於其中皆能決定了知。 另一偈復云:「非處不定眾,或向於異趣,邪定一切處,大牟尼悉知」,說明不定者或處非處、或趣異趣,而邪定則遍一切處,大牟尼無不了知。 又有偈頌具體描述邪定之相:「行於邪分別,為他說邪行,惑重無方便,佛見倒解脫」——即以邪分別自修、復以邪行化他、惑障深重而無方便者,佛見其所證為「倒解脫」(顛倒之解脫)。此「倒解脫」一詞,於本經作為邪定行者所得之異名,與「邪解脫」互為表裏。

綜觀此經,論「邪定」所用術語包括「邪定」本名、「邪性決定聚」、「邪定種」、「倒解脫」、「邪解脫」等;其論述側重於:邪定為十惡性中與邪見相應之染污定學、邪定為如來種種解智力所如實了知之業因種、邪定與正定、不定共成三聚之一,以及邪定行者「邪分別、邪說、惑重、無方便、倒解脫」之具體行相。本經未為「邪定」另立新譯名,徑用「邪定」二字,並以「邪性」表述其本質屬性、以「決定聚」凸顯其定性之義,此即本經所用之獨特術語形式。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》論「邪定」,並非以「與邪見相應之定」為直接定義,而是將邪定置於「三聚」框架中加以界定。論列三聚:一正性定聚、二邪性定聚、三不定性聚。其中「邪性」明確定義為「諸地獄、傍生、餓鬼」三惡趣;「定」則釋為「無間」,謂造無間業者必墮地獄,故名邪定。正邪定之餘者,名不定性聚,「彼待二緣,可成二故」,即隨緣可轉入正或邪。此處術語形式為「邪性定聚」與「邪定」互用,「邪性」指所趣之果(三惡趣),「定」指決定性(必墮),合稱即「決定趣向邪性」之義。

論中同時以對照方式凸顯邪定之定位:正性定聚以「貪無餘斷、瞋無餘斷、癡無餘斷,一切煩惱皆無餘斷」為正性,以聖道已生、畢竟離繫為定。順解脫分者雖定得涅槃,仍不名正定,原因之一即「彼後或墮邪定聚故」,可見邪定聚在論中是修行退墮之可能歸處。

關於邪定與邪見之關係,論以四句分別「斷善根」與「墮邪定」並非等同:有斷善根而非墮邪定者(布剌拏等外道),有墮邪定而非斷善根者(未生怨即阿闍世王),有二者俱是者(天授即提婆達多),有二者俱非者(除前相)。此四句顯示俱舍論將「邪定」理解為趣向惡道之決定性,與見地上之斷善根屬不同維度,不可混同。

邪見本身之業道相,論頌云:「惡欲他財貪,憎有情瞋恚,撥善惡等見,名邪見業道」,即以撥無善惡因果之見為邪見體性。又云「唯邪見斷善」,所斷者為欲界生得善,撥因果一切,漸斷而二俱捨;續善則以疑有見而頓現,唯除造逆者。此處「造逆者」不得續善,正與邪定之「造無間者必墮地獄」相呼應。

末後,論於造逆之加行位明言:「造逆定加行,無離染得果」,謂已入無間業加行者,決定不得離染、不得證果,此即邪定在修道論上之具體效應——非僅是來世果報之判定,亦障現世聖道之得。

總之,本論「邪定」一詞之核心義為:以三惡趣為邪性、以無間業之決定性為定,合指必墮惡趣之決定聚。其術語形式為「邪性定聚」,與「正性定聚」對舉;論中未以「與邪見相應之定」釋邪定,而是以業果決定性(必墮地獄)立名,此為本論獨特之界定角度。

Related