Dharma · AI Companion

欲取

kāmopādāna

四取中对五欲境的执取。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In Buddhism's system of liberation, the pivotal mechanism by which life repeatedly falls into anxiety, struggle, and saṃsāra lies in "craving" (愛) and "clinging" (取). "Craving" is the thirst that arises internally, while "clinging" (Upādāna) is the psychological act of grasping, holding fast, and appropriating as one's own.

Among the many types of clinging, "clinging to sensual desires" (kāmupādāna) is the most widespread and the most deeply embedded in worldly life. A one-sentence definition: "Clinging to sensual desires" refers to the stubborn attachment to and pursuit of mundane material desires, sensual enjoyments (the "five sublime sensual pleasures of heaven"), as well as one's own views, driven by concern for reputation and fear of others' criticism. It is the root cause of suffering.

To accurately understand 欲取 (kāmupādāna), one must not simplistically reduce it to "biological urges" or "greed for wealth and sex." In the refined exposition of the *Madhyama-āgama* (《中阿含經》), 欲取 possesses a highly structured and richly delineated architecture:

1. The Twofold Meaning of Clinging to Sensual Desires: Sensual Enjoyments and Reputation

* Grasping at the Sensory and Material: Attachment to and relentless pursuit of the sensual experiences corresponding to the eye, ear, nose, tongue, and body — namely forms, sounds, smells, tastes, and tactile sensations (called in the canon the "five sublime sensual pleasures of heaven" or "five pleasures") — as well as to wealth, fame, and material conditions. * Stubborn Defense of Reputation and Image: In the canon, King Paesi (蜱肆王), confronted by the admonitions of the Venerable Kumāra-Kāśyapa, knows full well that his false views are absurd, yet because he "cares for his reputation, fears being discussed by people of other lands as having been subdued by a śramaṇa and made to abandon his views," he defiantly declares: "I will never abandon this clinging to sensual desires, clinging to aversion, clinging to fear, or clinging to ignorance." This reveals an extremely profound other dimension of 欲取 — for the sake of preserving self-esteem, persona, and reputation, one would rather stubbornly hold onto wrong views and cravings than admit failure or let go of vested interests and face.

2. The Nature of Desire: A Bottomless Pit and "The Suffering of Desire Holds No Pleasure"

The canon hits the mark when it points out: the fatal flaw of mundane material pursuits lies in "insatiability" (無有足). "Though heaven rains down wondrous treasures, and gold accumulates like snow, there is no satisfaction in desire." Even if rare treasures rained from the sky, or wealth piled up like a snow mountain, those driven by greed would never feel content. So-called sensory pleasure is, in essence, merely a temporary alleviation of the suffering of thirst and unease. If one does not see through its illusoriness and clings to it, one mistakes suffering for happiness.

3. Three Great Similes from the Canon: Three Kinds of Foolish Attachment, Their Expressions and Consequences

To shatter King Paesi's stubborn defense of the four kinds of clinging including 欲取, the Venerable Kumāra-Kāśyapa employed three vivid similes, each precisely corresponding to a different pathology of attachment and its harmful results:

* The Simile of Discarding Gold for Hemp (corresponding to "losing the greater for the lesser, forfeiting higher merit"): Two men travel together. One sees cheap hemp and carries a heavy load home; the other repeatedly discards lower-value items along the way, successively exchanging them for silver and gold. The hemp-carrier, saying "I have come from afar, I want to carry this hemp home myself, I will never abandon it," ultimately returns to be scolded by his family — unable to support them or to give alms. This symbolizes how stubbornly clinging to base sensual desires and stale views causes one to lose the opportunity to attain higher wisdom and merit. * The Simile of the Merchants Who Lost Their Water (corresponding to "blindly heeding false words, falling into a desperate situation"): A foolish merchant leader heeds a false claim, and before even seeing new water, recklessly discards his stored water, causing the entire caravan to die of thirst on a barren road, becoming food for man-eating demons. This symbolizes blindly chasing illusory promises of desire, discarding what is truly valuable as a foundation, and ultimately falling into mortal danger. * The Simile of the Pig-Keeper Carrying Dung (corresponding to "coveting a base thing, soiling oneself and inviting disgust"): The pig-keeper covets dung because it can feed his pigs. Even when rain falls mid-journey, causing the dung to liquefy, run over and foul his entire body, he still carries the dung and refuses to let it go. This vividly reveals: stubbornly clinging to 欲取 and false face is like carrying a load of stinking dung one refuses to discard — not only does one endure immeasurable suffering oneself, but one also "endures immeasurable evil and is loathed by the multitude."

4. The Three Levels of "Pursuing Desires" for Householders and the "Wisdom of Renouncing Desire"

For the vast majority of lay practitioners living in the mundane world, the canon does not adopt a one-size-fits-all stance of extreme rejection. Rather, it clearly distinguishes three levels of "pursuing desires" (行欲) — that is, the pursuit and use of wealth and material necessities in everyday life:

1. The Lowest Level of Pursuing Desires (both aspects are evil): Seeking wealth by unlawful means, and once having acquired it, neither supporting one's family nor enjoying it oneself in a reasonable manner, nor giving alms to create merit. This both harms others and fails to nurture any wholesome fruit. 2. The Higher Level of Pursuing Desires (both aspects are virtuous): Seeking wealth through one's own diligence and rightful means (according to Dharma), enabling both family and oneself to live with dignity, while actively supporting others and giving alms to create merit. 3. The Highest Level of Pursuing Desires (attaining the wisdom of renouncing desire): Although living in a lay environment and using worldly wealth, one is able to "attain the wisdom of renunciation, see the calamities and dangers, be content, and use wealth frugally." That is to say, while enjoying life, one clearly sees the harm and limitations behind desire, maintaining contentment and restraint. This wisdom — of not being overwhelmed by worldly desires yet able to awaken and transcend them — is called the "wisdom of renouncing desire" (出欲慧), and it is the highest attainment for lay practitioners.


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

Let us set aside the abstract entry and map the generative mechanism and layers of 欲取 onto scenarios that modern people experience every day:

Scenario One: Late-Night Online Shopping and "Algorithmic Feeding"

* Phenomenon: Working overtime late into the night, feeling exhausted and empty, you open your phone, and the algorithm precisely pushes a stream of exquisite products. You make the purchase on impulse, and for that moment you feel a brief rush and pleasure. But days later, the packages pile up at your doorstep — some you don't even bother to unbox — and the emptiness and anxiety inside you have only deepened. * Canonical Mapping: "Though heaven rains down wondrous treasures, and gold accumulates like snow, there is no satisfaction in desire." The algorithm exploits the brain's dopamine mechanism, endlessly raining "treasures" down on you, but the pocket of desire has no bottom. You think you are buying happiness, but what you are actually experiencing is the temporary numbness manufactured by 欲取. * Common Error: Thinking, "I just like this product." In truth, the product itself is merely "form, sound, smell, taste, touch." The real root of the disease is the "clinging" in the mind — that illusion that "if I possess this, I will be happy" — and the sense of lack that remains even after the purchase.

Scenario Two: Knowing Full Well the Project Direction Is Wrong, Yet Pushing On for the Sake of "Persona"

* Phenomenon: You are leading a project at your company. Midway through, ample data already proves this direction is a dead end. But you fear that admitting the mistake will lead colleagues to say you're "incompetent," and you fear losing the "never fails" persona in front of your superiors. So you decide to keep increasing the budget, force the team to work overtime, and grit your teeth through to the end. The result: the entire department is seething with resentment, and the project fails miserably. * Canonical Mapping: This is exactly the Paesi-king pattern of "caring for reputation, fearing discussion" and stubbornly holding onto one's views. The inviolable "success persona" you carry on your back is the load of dung in the "Simile of the Pig-Keeper Carrying Dung." The "rain has already made the filth run down and foul your body," yet you refuse to let go because "I've already invested so much, I can't admit I was wrong." * Common Error: People tend to rationalize this kind of stubborn persistence as "responsibility" or "perseverance." But from the Dharma's perspective, if one ignores objective facts purely to protect vanity, face, and vested interests, this is a textbook case of 欲取 intertwined with 見取 (clinging to views), and it will inevitably end in "enduring immeasurable evil."

Scenario Three: The Three States of Earning and Consuming in the Modern Workplace

Let us consider how modern people correspond to the three levels of "pursuing desires":

* The Lower Level: Using unscrupulous means to make money (such as online fraud or shady speculation), and once the money is made, being extremely stingy or falling into pathological gambling — neither improving one's own or one's family's life, nor doing any charitable giving for society. This is "seeking wealth unlawfully, both aspects being evil." * The Higher Level: Earning money lawfully through one's professional competence (如法求財), buying proper insurance for one's parents, taking the family on trips, occasionally donating to charity or supporting public welfare. This kind of life is open and upright — it belongs to "both aspects being virtuous," and is a worldly way of living that Buddhism fully affirms and encourages. * The Highest Level (wisdom of renouncing desire): Also striving in the workplace and earning a good income, but with a clear mirror in the mind: knowing that high consumption and a luxurious lifestyle cannot bring true peace of mind (seeing the calamities); not blindly following trends or competing in vanity, consuming with restraint (using wealth frugally); and while amassing wealth, being able at any moment to let go of attachment to material things (being content). This is living out the "wisdom of renouncing desire" right in the midst of worldly life.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary society is an era in which 欲取 has been infinitely amplified and infinitely refined.

We live in a web of "five sublime sensual pleasures" woven together by commercial advertising, social media, and recommendation algorithms. Previously, people's desires were limited by physical space; today, with a single swipe of the finger, the world's consumer stimuli flood into our eyes at once. Yet research in neuroscience and psychology similarly confirms what the canon states — "insatiability": dopamine is responsible only for generating the stimulus of "craving," not for producing sustained "satisfaction." The moment a desire is satisfied, tolerance rises, and the next time a stronger stimulus is needed to produce the same degree of pleasure.

At the same time, contemporary people are enduring an unprecedented "persona anxiety." From the "curated life" of WeChat Moments to the "undefeated résumé" in the workplace, everyone is meticulously crafting their own views and labels. Once these labels face collapse, many people fall into severe psychological breakdown. This is precisely the same psychology as King Paesi's stubborn defense of his wrong views out of fear of being discussed.

In this era, what 欲取 teaches contemporary people is not escapism, but a kind of extremely lucid wisdom of liberation:

1. It deconstructs the "consumerist myth of happiness": It tells you that pleasure is not liberation, and that the accumulation of material goods cannot fill the black hole of the mind. Only by seeing clearly the essence of "the suffering of desire holds no pleasure" can one stop the blind rat race and endless comparison. 2. It provides a highly operable guide for worldly life: It does not force everyone to renounce the world and engage in ascetic practice, but instead offers the path of "wisdom of renouncing desire" — you can still earn money according to Dharma and live with dignity, but you must build within your mind a firewall of "frugality, contentment, and seeing the calamities." 3. It teaches people the art of cutting losses — "discarding hemp for gold": When you realize that some obsession, some interest, some face you have been clinging to has already become worthless "hemp" or even stinking "dung," you have the courage to let go in time and pursue a higher dimension of spiritual freedom and peace.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: Buddhism teaches "cutting off desire," so contemporary people shouldn't even have normal eating, drinking, desires, or career ambitions?

* Clarification: This is the most common confusion between "desire" (欲) and "clinging to desire" (欲取). Normal physiological needs (such as eating when hungry, drinking when thirsty) and legitimate career pursuits are called "desire" or "aspiration" in Buddhism — they are inherently neutral life energies. * The key lies in "clinging": The moment you add to these needs the desperate grasping and stubborn holding of "it must belong to me," "I can never lose it," "if I don't have this, I'm finished" — that is when it becomes 欲取. When the canon discusses lay "pursuing desires," it explicitly affirms the legitimacy of "seeking wealth lawfully, using it for oneself and one's family, and giving alms to create merit."

Misreading Two: Understanding the "wisdom of renouncing desire" — "seeing calamities and being content" — as negative lying flat or giving up.

* Clarification: "Lying flat" (摆烂) is an abandonment tinged with indifference, despair, or resentment (which in essence is often accompanied by clinging to aversion or clinging to ignorance). The "wisdom of renouncing desire" is a proactive choice and inner fulfillment based on profound insight. * A person endowed with the "wisdom of renouncing desire" can still be extremely efficient and professional in their work (seeking wealth according to Dharma), but they do not bind the entire value of their life to performance metrics or external evaluations. They are able to "use wealth frugally" and not be held hostage by consumerism; they are able to "see the calamities," and thus, in the face of gain and loss, maintain extraordinarily strong psychological resilience. This is by no means passivity — it is an extremely advanced form of spiritual freedom.

Misreading Three: Thinking that "views and face" are matters of thought, unrelated to "clinging to sensual desires."

* Clarification: The example of King Paesi in the canon demonstrates with great depth that people's attachment to material desires is often tightly intertwined with attachment to "reputation, image, and wrong views." Many times, we cannot let go of a luxury item, a high-paying but miserable job — not because we truly need the material thing, but because we cannot let go of the social status it represents, the envious gaze of others, and the dignity we have painstakingly cultivated. This psychology of stubbornly holding onto wrong views out of concern for reputation is precisely the most tenacious manifestation of 欲取 on the spiritual level. Learning to discard "dung-like face" is what makes a true courageous person.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义 在佛教经典中,“欲取”(kāmupādāna)是指对世俗物质欲望、感官享受以及自身所持见解的顽固执著。它是众生在世俗生活中产生痛苦与束缚的核心根源。在《中阿含经》中,欲取不仅表现为对物质财富和感官快乐的贪恋,还表现为因顾及名誉、害怕被他人议论而对自身错误见解的死守不放。

二、 主要阐述 《中阿含经》对“欲取”的阐释极为深入,主要通过生动的譬喻、对欲之本质的剖析,以及对在家修行者“行欲”层次的划分来展开。 首先,经中通过蜱肆王与尊者鸠摩罗迦叶的对话,集中展现了“欲取”的顽固性。蜱肆王因执著于自己的见解,并顾及名誉(害怕被他国异人议论自己被沙门降伏、断舍),因而宣告对于“欲取、恚取、怖取、癡取”终不能舍。为了破除这种执著,尊者鸠摩罗迦叶运用了三个生动的譬喻: 1. “舍麻取金喻”:两人行路,一人见麻便重担而归;另一人则在途中不断舍弃低价值的物品,最终舍麻取银、舍银取金。而执著于麻的人因“所來處遠,我要自欲擔此麻歸,終不捨之”,回家后被父母责骂,无法供养家人或布施作福。这说明执著于低劣的“欲取”会失去获得更高福报的机会。 2. “商人失水喻”:愚痴的商人主听信妄言,在未见新水前便舍弃故水,导致全队在饥俭道中渴死,为食人鬼所害。 3. “养猪人负粪喻”:养猪人贪图粪便可以养猪,即使遇雨导致粪液流漫、污染其身,仍执著不舍。这形象地说明,死守“欲取”等执著,就如同负粪不舍,不仅自受痛苦,还会“受無量之惡,亦為眾人之所憎惡”。 其次,经文揭示了欲的本质与断欲之慧。经中明确指出,世俗的物质追求是无法带来真正满足的。即使天雨妙珍宝,或者获得如大雪山般的金积,贪欲之人依然“無有足”。经文强调“欲苦無有樂”,智慧者应当认识到欲的苦本质。即使面对“天妙五欲”,等正觉的弟子也不以此五乐为足,而应当“斷愛不著欲”。 再者,针对在家的世俗生活,经中进一步将“行欲”(追求与使用财物)划分为不同的层次: 1. 最下等行欲:以非法手段求财,且不供养他人、不自己使用,也不布施作福,这种行为“二俱皆有惡”。 2. 较上等行欲:如法求财,通过自身勤劳所得,既能供养他人及自用,又能布施作福,属于“二俱皆有德”。 3. 最上等行欲(出欲慧):虽然行欲并住于在家,但能“得出要慧”,在行欲的过程中“見災患知足,節儉用財物”。这种能够觉察欲之灾患、节俭知足的态度,被称为“得出欲慧”,是在家行欲中的最高境界。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异 在《中阿含经》的论述中,与“欲”相关的独特术语和表述呈现出特定的形式: 1. 执著的并列形式:经中将对欲、恚、怖、痴的执著并列,独特地表述为“欲取、恚取、怖取、癡取”。 2. 感官享受的称呼:经中将世俗的感官享受称为“天妙五欲”与“五樂”。 3. 世俗欲望生活的称呼:将在家的欲望生活及财富追求称为“行欲”。 4. 超越欲望的智慧:将超越或在欲中觉悟的智慧称为“出要慧”与“出欲慧”。

四、 与相关概念的关系 1. 与“恚取、怖取、癡取”的关系:在经中,“欲取”与“恚取、怖取、癡取”并列,共同构成了众生因执著而无法解脱的四种心理束缚。蜱肆王因顾及名誉而对这四取宣告“终不能舍”,展现了这些执著相互交织、难以断除的特征。 2. 与“行欲”及“出欲慧”的关系:“行欲”是在家人的世俗生活常态,而“欲取”则是对这种生活的盲目执著。通过修行,在家众可以从最下等的“非法不供养”行欲,提升到如法的行欲,并最终通过“得出要慧”(或称“出欲慧”),在行欲中“見災患知足”,从而超越“欲取”的束缚。 3. 与“斷愛不著欲”的关系:面对“天妙五欲”,等正觉的弟子不以“五樂”为足,而是通过认识到“欲苦無有樂”的本质,走向“斷愛不著欲”的解脱境界,这正是对“欲取”的彻底否定与超越。

五、 代表性原文引用 1. 蜱肆王对执著的宣告:“我於此欲取、恚取、怖取、癡取,終不能捨。” 2. 舍麻取金喻中关于执著的描述:“所來處遠,我要自欲擔此麻歸,終不捨之。” 3. 养猪人负粪喻的恶果:“受無量之惡,亦為眾人之所憎惡。” 4. 关于欲之无足与本质:“天雨妙珍寶,及積金如雪,於欲無有足,慧者已知苦。天妙五欲中,無有可樂者,正覺弟子眾,斷愛不著欲。” 5. 关于最上等行欲与出欲慧:“得出要慧,見災患知足,節儉用財物,是謂行欲人中第一、最上、最大、最尊、無上。”

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

本經(《中阿含經》)以尊者鳩摩羅迦葉與蜱肆王的往復問答為背景,圍繞「欲取」乃至四取展開論述。

一、本經四取的術語形式 本經列四取為「欲取、恚取、怖取、癡取」。此分類與一般常見之「欲取、見取、戒禁取、我取」之四取名相不同,而以「欲、恚、怖、癡」四煩惱為四取之內容。其中「怖取」一詞尤為獨特,指對名聞利養受人輕賤之怖畏執取;「恚取」指瞋恚之執取;「癡取」即無明之執取;「欲取」則指對五欲境的貪愛執取。

二、欲取的具體展現——執見不捨 蜱肆王自述其執見之因由:「若有他國異人聞之,便作是說:『蜱肆王有見長夜受持,彼為沙門鳩摩羅迦葉之所降伏、所治、斷捨。』迦葉!是故我此見欲取、恚取、怖取、癡取,終不能捨。」 此處蜱肆王所展現的,恰是欲取(愛著己見、護惜名譽)、怖取(畏懼外人譏嫌)交織的執著,故反覆申言「終不能捨」。

三、勸捨四取的多重譬喻 尊者鳩摩羅迦葉以五喻反覆勸化:(一) 負麻不捨喻:二人共行,一人先負麻,途見金銀仍不捨麻,終自受殃。(二) 商人迷途喻:商主輕信前言,不捨故水樵草,致同行商主為食人鬼所殺。(三) 賭博偷食喻:戲者偷食欺人,終自得惡。(四) 負糞遇雨喻:養猪人負糞遇雨,自受污穢,為人所憎。(五) 猪王逢虎喻:大猪遇虎,不知何以脫難。每喻之後皆結以「當知蜱肆亦復如是……汝便當受無量之惡,亦為眾人之所憎惡」之語,藉以說明堅執四取不捨之過患。

四、斷欲離欲的對比 經中亦以正向對比示現離欲之德:「若有沙門、梵志斷絕離欲,趣向離欲,斷絕離恚,趣向離恚,斷絕離癡,趣向離癡,彼以清淨天眼出過於人,見此眾生死時、生時……見其如真。」 此段以「斷絕離欲、離恚、離癡」之次第,與四取中之欲取、恚取、癡取正相對應,顯示「取」之與「離」之關係。

五、獨特側面 本經論欲取的獨特處在於:不僅論欲取對五欲境的執著,更將「欲取」與「恚取、怖取、癡取」並列,揭示凡夫對自己邪見之愛惜護持,其本質實為欲、恚、怖、癡四煩惱交織之執取。此一以「欲、恚、怖、癡」為四取之分法,與一般常見之「欲取、見取、戒禁取、我取」不同,乃本經之特殊用詞,應予記錄。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

一、欲取的構成與體性

本論以「欲取」一名標舉四取之中對欲界五欲境的執取。其體等同於欲軛并欲無明,合三十四物:貪、瞋、慢、無明各五,疑有四,并十纏。「欲取」之「取」名,係據契經「欲貪名取」而立,故於欲等四所起之欲貪即名欲等取。

二、與欲漏、欲瀑流、欲軛之同異

論中明示「四軛與瀑流同,四取應知體同四軛」,又「前欲漏即欲瀑流及欲軛」。但欲取之數為三十四,較欲漏二十九物多出五種欲界無明。蓋以「能取諸有故立取名,然諸無明非能取故」,無明雖不獨立為取,卻以「能為諸有本故」而並入欲取之體。

三、四取之分類與別立之由

四取者,即欲取、我語取、見取、戒禁取。我語取為前有軛并二界無明,計三十八物,謂貪、慢、無明各十,疑有八。見取於見軛中除戒禁取,餘三十物;所除六物別立戒禁取。論釋別立戒禁取之由:「由此獨為聖道怨故,雙誑在家出家眾故」——在家眾由計自餓等為天道而誑惑,出家眾由計捨可愛境為清淨道而誑惑。

四、用語之特點

本論始終用「欲取」「我語取」「見取」「戒禁取」之稱,未見其他異名。欲軛之展開,引經以「欲貪、欲欲、欲親、欲愛、欲樂、欲悶、欲耽、欲嗜、欲喜、欲藏、欲隨、欲著」十二名顯其纏壓於心之相,有軛、見軛應知亦爾。

瑜伽師地論T1579 · 瑜伽部

《瑜伽師地論》對「欲取」的論述涵蓋定義、建立所依、果報差別、相關貪的分類、諸欲的細分、欲求之差別、依止耽嗜諸法的五相等多個層面,分述如下:

一、四取中的定位:欲取與見取、戒禁取、我語取合稱四取,欲取為四取之初。又四取復與四繫、五蓋、三株杌、三不善根、三漏、三匱等諸雜染法並列,欲取之建立即生死流轉繫縛之根本。

二、定義:欲取即「於諸欲所有欲貪」,指對諸欲境所起的貪愛執取。

三、建立所依與品類差別:論中以二品為依建立四取——受用欲諸在家品及惡說法毘奈耶中諸出家品。欲取以欲愛為緣而立,屬於在家品;其餘三取分別依利養恭敬等愛、定愛、有無有愛為緣而立。又約取心所依而論,為得諸欲及為受用故,起初取(即欲取);由貪利養及以恭敬增上力故、或為詰責他所立論、或為免脫他所徵難,起第二取;為欲往趣世間離欲乃至非想非非想處三摩鉢底,起第三取;為欲隨說分別所計作業受果所有士夫之相,起我語取。

四、果報差別:欲取唯能生欲界苦果,見取、戒禁取、我語取則通生三界苦果。

五、相關貪的分類:貪有四種——著諸見、欲、色、無色,其中「欲」一類即對五欲妙欲的貪著,正對應欲取所攝。

六、諸欲的細分與出離:諸欲自性分二種,一事欲,涵穀與財及其依處等助伴受用;二煩惱欲,為於事欲隨逐愛味所起的妄分別貪,能令心沈沒成下劣性。論中亦以毒蛇喻諸欲境,謂愚夫貪著受用如蛇所螫,多聞聖弟子則能調伏斷滅,超度諸欲。

七、欲求之差別:欲求有五種——攝受求、受用求、戲樂求、乏解了求、名聲求。

八、依止耽嗜諸法的五相:由事、因緣、自性、助伴、等起五相建立。事為欲界繫諸五取蘊;因緣為順欲貪五種妙欲;自性為貪嗜者由彼為緣、由彼為境所有欲貪;助伴為不如理作意相應邪願諸欲分別;等起為五種黑品。

Related