Dharma · AI Companion

五欲

pañcakāma

对色声香味触的世俗欲求。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

初立第一重:对色声香味触的世俗欲求,属出离与对治所缘的条目(另有作「五欲境」解者偏事相,语料主用法仍在能欲之心);究竟第二重:般若观五欲如幻、性空无实,欲境欲心俱无自性,收于缘生性空一重。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

In the Buddhist path of liberation, the concept of 五欲 (*Wuyu* / The Five Desires, Sanskrit: *pañca-kāmaguṇa*) is not merely a moral warning against indulgence; it is a profound cognitive and psychological diagnosis of the human condition. To understand it is to understand the very mechanics of how we become entangled in suffering and how we can ultimately find our way out.

Let us explore this fundamental concept, peeling back its layers to see how it operates in our daily lives and where it sits in the grand architecture of Buddhist practice.

这个概念在说什么 (What this concept is about)

To understand the Five Desires, we must first look at its strict classical definition. It does not vaguely mean "greed" or "ambition." According to the *Samyukta Agama* (《杂阿含经》) and the *Maharatnakuta Sutra* (《大宝积经》), the Five Desires arise from a highly specific structural interaction between our five sensory organs (五根) and their corresponding external environments (五境):

1. Eye (眼) interacting with Form/Color (色) 2. Ear (耳) interacting with Sound (声) 3. Nose (鼻) interacting with Smell (香) 4. Tongue (舌) interacting with Taste (味) 5. Body (身) interacting with Touch/Tactile sensation (触)

When these sense organs encounter pleasant, agreeable, and thought-provoking objects in the world, an experience of delight is generated. However, the sutras draw a crucial, razor-sharp boundary here: The external objects (forms, sounds, smells, tastes, tangible objects) are NOT the "desire" itself. The true "desire" (*kāma*) lies entirely in the craving, attachment, and discriminatory thoughts (贪著 / 贪欲觉想) that the mind generates toward these objects. As the *Maharatnakuta Sutra* states, "Discriminatory imagination is the root of the Five Desires; if the wise do not discriminate, the Five Desires are extinguished" (忆想妄分别,则是五欲本;智者不分别,五欲则断灭).

Because we fail to see the impermanent, illusory nature of these sensory contacts, we become deeply entangled. The classical texts use intensely visceral metaphors to describe the danger of this entanglement: * The Demon's Hook (魔钩): When the eye clings to a form or the ear to a sound, it is like a demon's hook catching a person by the throat, stripping away their freedom. * The Fire Pit (火坑): A wise practitioner sees the Five Desires not as a warm hearth, but as a raging fire pit that consumes one's peace of mind. * Foreign Territory (他处他境界): Like a bird that flies away from its parents' safe territory into a hunter's net, wandering blindly into the realm of the Five Desires guarantees disaster.

In the grand scheme of the Buddhist path to liberation (解脱道), overcoming the Five Desires is the foundational step. The Buddha taught that these desires are "obstacles to the path" (障道法). You cannot build the high-rise of meditative concentration (禅定 - *Dhyāna*) or the realization of ultimate wisdom on the shifting sands of sensory craving.

生活里的走查 (A Walkthrough in Daily Life)

To see how the "Demon's hook" operates, let us walk through a very modern, familiar scenario: Late-night smartphone doomscrolling and the sudden urge to order takeout.

Imagine it is 11:30 PM. You have had a stressful day at work. You lie in bed, pick up your phone, and open a short-video app.

* Eye and Form (眼与色): You see a beautifully edited video of a bustling night market. The colors are vibrant, the lighting is perfect. The UI of the app is designed to be visually seamless. * Ear and Sound (耳与声): You hear the ASMR sizzle of fried chicken hitting hot oil, accompanied by upbeat, dopamine-triggering background music. * Body and Touch (身与触): You are nestled in your soft bed, feeling the smooth, ergonomic glass of the phone screen under your thumb as you swipe. * Nose and Smell (鼻与香) / Tongue and Taste (舌与味): Though you aren't physically eating, your brain pulls up the memory of the savory, salty, rich taste of fried chicken and its mouth-watering aroma.

At this moment, the Five Desires are fully activated. The mind begins to conceptually proliferate (妄想分别). You feel an overwhelming urge: *I must have this right now to feel better.* You order the food. You eat it. For about ten minutes, there is a spike of pleasure. But as soon as the greasy wrappers are pushed aside, you feel bloated, tired, and a lingering sense of emptiness.

Mapping the Error: The most common mistake contemporary people make is blaming the external objects. We say, "Smartphones are toxic," or "Junk food is evil." But classical Buddhist doctrine corrects this instantly: The screen is just light and glass (色, 触). The sizzle is just sound waves (声). They are innocent. The "Five Desires" do not live in the phone; they live in the mind's grasping at the pleasant sensation, the desperate *thirst* to consume it to alleviate the stress of the day.

The *Maharatnakuta Sutra* brilliantly describes this phenomenon as "drinking water in a dream to quench thirst" (渴梦饮水). In the dream, you gulp down water, but you wake up just as thirsty as before. The pursuit of the Five Desires is inherently insatiable (无有厌足).

当代人为什么需要它 (Why contemporary people need it)

Contemporary people desperately need the concept of the Five Desires because we live in an era where an entire "Attention Economy" is engineered to exploit our sensory organs. Algorithms, targeted advertising, and immersive technologies are hyper-stimulants for the Five Desires. We are exhausted because our senses are constantly being hooked, dragged, and pulled by external stimuli.

Modern neuroscience and behavioral psychology often talk about this in terms of dopamine loops, reward prediction errors, and the brain's hedonic treadmill. We can certainly use this modern knowledge as a parallel: the algorithm provides the stimulus, dopamine provides the craving, and we are stuck in a loop. *However, we must be careful not to equate the two.* Science describes the biological mechanism of our behavior and seeks to optimize our functioning within the world. Buddhism, on the other hand, points to the profound existential tragedy of this loop—that it is the very root of our suffering (苦本)—and offers a path of *complete liberation* from it, not just a temporary "dopamine detox."

Understanding the Five Desires gives contemporary readers a profound sense of agency. You realize that you do not need to fight the entire world or run away to a cave to find peace. The battleground is not the shopping mall or the internet; it is the space between a sensory contact and your mind's reaction to it.

常见误读与澄清 (Common Misreadings and Clarifications)

Misreading 1: "Buddhism hates the physical world and demands extreme asceticism." *Clarification:* This is a gross oversimplification. The *Samyukta Agama* makes it clear that the physical world (the Five Objects) and the mind's craving are separate. The Buddha famously rejected extreme asceticism. The goal is not to blind your eyes or deafen your ears, but to cultivate a mind that can see a beautiful flower (Form) or hear a beautiful song (Sound) without being chained to it by craving. As the sutra illustrates with the "Lute Metaphor" (弹琴喻) given to Srona Kotikarna: practice must be the Middle Way—"neither too loose nor too tight" (不缓不急).

Misreading 2: "Enjoying anything means I am a bad practitioner." *Clarification:* Buddhism acknowledges different stages and capacities of practitioners. The sutras explicitly state that laypeople (Upāsakas and Upāsikās) can live amid the Five Desires ("服习五欲"), and as long as they practice diligently to cut the underlying fetters (三结 / 五下分结), they can still attain noble stages of awakening like Sotāpanna (Stream-Enterer) or Sakadāgāmi (Once-Returner). The path is gradual.

Misreading 3: "True enlightened beings never interact with the Five Desires." *Clarification:* Here we must distinguish between the Śrāvaka (声闻 - hearer) and the Bodhisattva (菩萨) paths. While the Śrāvaka aims to physically and mentally distance themselves from sensory entanglements to ensure personal liberation, the *Avatamsaka Sutra* (《华严经》) and *Maharatnakuta Sutra* describe a magnificent, transcendent state for Bodhisattvas. A Bodhisattva may manifest right in the middle of the world, seemingly partaking in the Five Desires to connect with and save suffering beings (方便法门). Yet, internally, their mind is like a "pure lapis lazuli jewel" (净琉璃宝)—even if they spend hundreds of thousands of eons in the realm of desire, they are completely unstained (不为五欲之所染污). They are in the world, but not of it.

Ultimately, the teaching of the Five Desires is a warm, illuminating lamp on the Buddhist path. It does not scold us for our human frailties. Instead, like a wise friend, it gently points out the hooks we have swallowed, shows us how they are causing us pain, and teaches us how to patiently, mindfully unhook ourselves to taste the true, unshakeable joy of liberation.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

在佛教经典中,“五欲”(梵语:pañca-kāmaguṇa)是一个核心的修行关涉概念。根据《杂阿含经》,五欲常被表述为“五欲功德”,具体是指眼、耳、鼻、舌、身五根所对应的色、声、香、味、触五境,在众生心中生起可爱、可意、可念,从而长养欲乐的现象。然而,经典特别强调,外在的五种境界本身并不是“欲”,真正的“欲”在于众生对这些外境所产生的“贪著”或“贪欲觉想”。在《大宝积经》中,五欲亦被定义为“贪爱”,即对眼识所识之色、耳识所识之声、鼻识所识之香、舌识所识之味、身识所识之触的贪着,这种贪爱会引发执着,进而形成“结”、“缚”与“不实戏论”。

二、 主要阐述

1. 五欲的本质与过患

各经对五欲的虚妄本质与巨大危害进行了多角度的揭示。首先,五欲具有虚妄、无常与欺骗性。《杂阿含经》直斥五欲是“虚妄不实,欺诓之法,犹如幻化,诓于婴儿”,其本质是“虚空”或“虚伪”的。《大宝积经》指出人天五欲皆是“无常变坏之法”,势不久住,须臾磨灭,并将其比喻为“梦中受五欲乐”,醒后了不可得,反而徒增苦恼。《大方广佛华严经》则将五欲定性为“磨灭法”,其本质“虚伪无实如水沫,如幻野马水中月,有为如梦如浮云”,众生因愚痴而“长迷醉五欲,非实兴妄想,永为大苦障”。

其次,五欲具有“无有厌足”的特征。凡夫对五欲“染习……无有厌足”,受五欲乐则为“贪使所使”,若不离贪爱则成“不空欲”。在《大宝积经》中,这被形容为“渴梦饮水”,越饮越渴,终无厌足,众生之身亦是“无厌足贪受五欲”。

再者,五欲是障道与堕落的根源。五欲是“苦本”,是障碍修行的“障道法”,能直接障碍无上菩提。积习、贪著五欲会使人远离诸佛、障碍生天,更是堕入地狱、饿鬼、畜生等恶道苦恼以及世间纷争的根源。众生“长夜在生死中,忆念五欲、贪著五欲、爱乐五欲、心常流转五欲、境界永没五欲”,因而无法出离生死。

为了形象地说明五欲的危险,经典使用了丰富的譬喻: - 火坑喻:多闻圣弟子“见五欲犹如火坑”,对其生起远离之心。 - 魔钩喻:眼著色、耳著声等五境味著,如同“魔钩”钩其咽,使人不得自在。 - 他处他境界喻:以鹰鸟飞离父母境界而被罥捕为喻,将五欲比作“他处他境界”,修行者若游于其中必招灾患。 - 毒害与兵刃喻:五欲被形容为“毒药器”、“毒蛇头”、“利刀剑矟”与“大猛火”,或“五欲屠杀处”、“利刀害”与“斩肉形”,以及具有强烈毒害性的“五欲毒”。

此外,关于五欲的胜劣,经典记载七国王曾争论“五欲之中,何者第一”,佛陀指出五欲功德无有绝对的胜劣,而是“各随意适”,众生对偏爱者执为最胜。魔波旬也常化现劝诱修行者“还服食五欲”,而比丘们则以“非时之欲,少味多苦,少利多难”坚守清净。

2. 修行对治与解脱层次

针对五欲的缠缚,各经提出了不同的对治与转化法门: - 断除妄想:《大宝积经》指出五欲生起的根本在于众生的妄想分别:“忆想妄分别,则是五欲本”;若能做到“智者不分别”,则“五欲则断灭”。 - 禅定与念佛:修行者应“不顾五欲”、“不为五欲缚”,通过修习禅定来“度五欲流”。《大方广佛华严经》提出“毁呰五欲赞诸禅”以息灭爱欲,成就灭爱光;并明确指出“五欲缠心,修念佛三昧,皆悉除灭”。 - 观想与调伏:修习不净观与无常观(如不净想、不乐想、忧恼想、无常想、苦想),从而远离五欲,出家学道;并通过示现老病死苦,令放逸五欲的众生舍离放逸、修习善根,教导众生“厌恶五欲,赞叹惭愧,调伏诸根,修行无上清净梵行”。 - 次第引导与中道:《杂阿含经》中,对于重病的智慧优婆塞或优婆夷,应引导其先舍离“人间五欲”(恶露不净,败坏臭处),志愿“天上五欲”;随后再指出天欲亦是无常变坏之法,进而引导其乐于涅槃寂灭之乐。此外,修行应秉持中道,如二十亿耳比丘修行以弹琴为喻,“不缓不急”,平等修习,最终免于退减而证阿罗汉。 - 在家与出家的区别:《杂阿含经》指出,虽然出家修行要求彻底断除五欲,但在家的优婆塞、优婆夷即使“服习五欲”、“受五欲”,只要能断除三结(或五下分结),亦能证得须陀洹、斯陀含甚至阿那含果。而在《大宝积经》中,在家菩萨需持五戒、不赞五欲、不亲近女人;出家修行更需“不贪五欲”,安住空闲。

3. 声闻与菩萨的超越境界

在对待五欲的态度上,声闻与菩萨展现出不同的境界。《大宝积经》指出,声闻人虽“身离五欲而心不舍”,一旦接触外境或生天,仍会被五欲所缚,如“犬逐块”。而大乘菩萨则能行“方便”法门,虽为化度众生而示现“五欲自娱”或“共相娱乐”,但其内心“不染其心”、“永无恋著”,并能以“一切智咒”断除五欲之缚,不损善根。

《大方广佛华严经》中,菩萨“不求尊贵,不求五欲”,绝不以五欲来修菩萨行。菩萨的境界是“不著五欲,不依三界”,“不服五欲,不为一切诸魔所缚”。菩提心如同“净琉璃宝”,即使在欲界中历经百千劫,也“不为五欲之所染污”。菩萨还以度脱沉溺于五欲的众生为己任,观见众生没于五欲而发起大悲心,在日常生活中愿众生“舍离贪惑,功德具足”,或示现“童子地”令众生远离五欲,并通过放“除爱”光明,令众生“舍离五欲诸渴爱,思乐解脱甘露水”。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典与译本中,关于“五欲”的术语形式和用词存在细微而独特的差异: 1. 《杂阿含经》(阿含部·《雜阿含經》): - 常用“五欲功德”来指代五欲之境。 - 常将五欲与第六意(意法)并提,表述为“世间五欲,意第六”或“色声香味触,及第六诸法”。 - 将五欲因缘所生的念、乐、舍,定义为“有食念”、“有食乐”与“有食舍”。 2. 《大宝积经》(宝积部·《大寶積經》): - 常用“妙五欲”或“五尘”来指代五欲。 - 将对自身及女色的执着特称为“色缚”。 3. 《大方广佛华严经》(华严部·《大方廣佛華嚴經(六十華嚴)》,东晋佛驮跋陀罗译): - 主要使用“五欲”这一术语,并常与“渴爱”、“放逸”、“贪著”等词汇并用。 - 出现独特的表述如“五欲功德”、“不服五欲”、“五欲毒”以及“五欲缠心”。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 与第六意(意法)的关系:五欲(前五识之境)常与第六意并提,构成完整的世间认知与执着对象,如“世间五欲,意第六”。 2. 与有食/无食的关系:由五欲所生的念、乐、舍被称为“有食”境界,而禅定所生者则为“无食”境界,二者存在世俗与超世俗的对立。 3. 与三结/五下分结的关系:在家修行者虽受五欲,但若能断除三结或五下分结,仍可证得须陀洹至阿那含等圣果,说明断结与受五欲在在家修行中有其特定的容受度。 4. 与禅定及念佛三昧的关系:禅定是度脱五欲流的直接手段(“度五欲流”,“毁呰五欲赞诸禅”),而“念佛三昧”亦能悉数除灭“五欲缠心”。 5. 与菩提心的关系:菩提心具有极强的抗染污性,被比喻为“净琉璃宝”,即使历经百千劫亦“不为五欲之所染污”。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《杂阿含经》:“世间五欲,意第六”;多闻圣弟子“见五欲犹如火坑”;五欲是“虚妄不实,欺诓之法,犹如幻化,诓于婴儿”。 2. 《大宝积经》:“忆想妄分别,则是五欲本;智者不分别,五欲则断灭”;受五欲乐如“梦中受五欲乐”;五欲如同“渴梦饮水”,越饮越渴。 3. 《大方广佛华严经》:五欲是“磨灭法”,其本质“虚伪无实如水沫,如幻野马水中月,有为如梦如浮云”;众生“长迷醉五欲,非实兴妄想,永为大苦障”;“若得五欲,当愿众生,舍离贪惑,功功德具足”;“五欲缠心,修念佛三昧,皆悉除灭”。

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》論「五欲」,最明確的界定是「五欲功德」:可愛、可念、可樂、可意所念,與欲相應而使人歡喜;其內容為眼知色、耳知聲、鼻知香、舌知味、身知觸,即色、聲、香、味、觸五種感官境界。經中除「五欲功德」外,也使用「五欲」「五所欲」「五欲愛念歡樂」「人間五欲」「天五欲」及「天五所欲」等形式;故本經歸一記錄時,宜保留其主要術語「五欲功德」,並注意「五所欲」亦是同類異稱。

本經以「欲味、欲患、欲出要」為理解五欲的基本架構。五欲所生之樂與喜,被說為欲味之極,無復過此;但其患甚多。人為求取錢財以滿足欲樂,須忍受寒熱、飢渴、疲勞與蚊虻侵擾;求而不得則憂苦懊惱,求得又須愛惜守護。另一方面,離欲而由善法所得之捨樂與止息,則被譬為不依草木而燃之火,勝於依欲與惡不善法所生的喜樂。

對五欲之樂,本經不只說其短暫,更判明其性質:因五欲功德而生的喜樂,是凡夫樂、非聖樂,為病本、癰本、箭刺之本,「有食有生死」,不可修、不可習、不可廣布;相對的是離欲、離惡不善法乃至第四禪之樂,稱為聖樂、無欲樂、離樂、息樂、正覺之樂。

本經多以譬喻顯示五欲的欺誑與繫縛。欲如夢,醒後一無所有;如假借之物,物主隨時可以奪回;又如樹果雖美,貪著其上者可能隨樹被斫而受傷。因此經文總結其「樂少苦多,多有災患」,應當遠離。 五欲又被稱為獵師之食:沙門、梵志若親近而憍恣放逸,便落入魔王及其眷屬的境界;不近其食、不放逸,方能如第四群鹿脫離獵師。 凡夫若於五欲觸染、貪著、憍慠受入,又不見災患與出要,即為魔網、魔羂所纏;多聞聖弟子則不觸、不染、不貪、不著,見其災患與出要,而得脫魔羂。

在修習上,本經教比丘如實察覺五欲功德及相應欲染在心中生起,對每一欲功德觀無常、衰耗、無欲、斷、滅與斷捨離;欲染滅除後,能自知已斷,名為「正知」。 又說對五欲之習、滅、味、患、出要「見如真」,內息心而行,便不再稱歎或愛樂未離欲者所耽著的欲樂。

本經亦區分人間與天上五欲:天欲被說為較人間欲最上、最妙、最勝,但仍非究竟。頂生王雖具足色、聲、香、味、觸,意仍不滿足而命終;偈頌直言欲者無厭足,縱得天上妙五欲,亦不應著欲,應斷愛。 因此,本經對五欲的要旨不是否認其能生樂喜,而是如實辨明其味甚少、患甚多、能繫縛於魔境,並以見災患、見出要、觀無常與斷愛離欲為超越之道。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「五欲」,最明確的界說是「五欲功德」:眼識明色、耳識聲、鼻識香、舌識味、身識觸,凡可愛、可意、可念而能長養欲樂者,皆攝於其中。經中又特別辨明,外在眾色等境本身「非欲」,對境所起的貪著、貪欲覺想,才是士夫之欲;因此修行所斷的是「心欲」,不是令世間諸色消失。

本經通行的術語以「五欲功德」為主,也稱「五欲」、「五欲境界」,並以「色、聲、香、味、觸」列舉其內容;有些偈頌更把意及諸法列為第六,說「世間五欲德,心法說第六」。這些都是《雜阿含經》自身的用詞形式,不宜只用後設概念取代。

五欲的關鍵問題在於染著。經中說,凡夫於五欲功德不離貪、欲、愛、念與濁,即使年高仍是「成就年少之法」;年少者若能離貪、離欲、離愛、離念、離濁,反而成就「老人法」。又以「空欲」表示於五欲功德離貪、欲、愛、念、渴,以「不空欲」表示愛樂、長養而深染著。

《雜阿含經》多以危險譬喻揭示五欲之患:見五欲當如見火坑;又說五欲功德是「叢林」、是「屠殺處」或「生臭」,並譬如利刀、斬肉之形,指出受樂背後有繫縛、恐怖及苦患。漏盡比丘見五欲如火坑,於欲念、欲受、欲著,心不永住。

經中亦從受說明凡聖差別:無聞凡夫遇五欲所生樂受,便受欲樂而為貪使所使;多聞聖弟子雖遇樂受,卻不染欲樂,故貪使不使。另以「有食念」、「有食樂」、「有食捨」稱五欲因緣所生的念、喜樂與捨,並與諸禪所生的「無食」境界相對。

對治不只是否定欲樂,而是攝護六入、正念觀察與修習離欲。經教比丘守住四念處這一「自處父母境界」,遠離可意色聲香味觸所構成的「他境界」;又教多聞聖弟子於五欲功德善自攝護,令欲心滅,見其集、滅、味、患、離,如實知四聖諦,使貪憂惡不善法不漏其心。

本經也保留在家眾受用五欲的層次差別:有優婆塞、優婆夷居家受習五欲而證得相應果位;臨終教誡則先令捨人間五欲,進而觀天上妙欲亦是無常、苦、空、變壞之法,最後轉向涅槃寂滅之樂。由此可見,本經既直陳五欲的染著與危險,也按修行者處境敘述漸次捨離。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》對「五欲」的基本界定,是眼見可愛之色、耳聞聲、鼻嗅香、舌知味、身知「細滑」而生愛敬、憶念與喜好;其中「細滑」即本經描述身所感受之觸境時常用的譯語。因此,本經列舉五境時多作「色、聲、香、味、細滑」,而非直接以「觸」為第五項,這是本經值得記錄的特定用詞。

本經把五欲置於多種法義架構中說明。論「二見」時,以五欲解釋「欲有見」,並將之納入欲有、色有、無色有的「有見」分類;論「四流」時,則說「欲流」就是五欲,依眼見色乃至身知細滑而起相識,眾生沈沒其中便不能得道。另有譬喻以此岸為身、彼岸為身滅、中沒為欲愛,而以「在岸上」譬喻五欲,顯示五欲是修行途中足以使人停著之處。

就五欲的吸引力而言,本經稱由五欲引生的苦、樂心為「欲味」。五王爭論色、聲、香、味、細滑何者最妙時,佛說各隨人的「性行」與染著而定:著色者以色為最妙,著聲、香、味、細滑者亦復如此;所樂之處,心即染著。經中並逐項說五欲皆有「氣味」、有「過失」、亦有「出要」:因有味而使眾生染著,因有過而可生厭患,因有出要而得出生死之海、至無畏涅槃城。這不是判定某一欲境客觀上最勝,而是指出其「最妙」之感隨貪著而成立。

本經又反覆強調五欲無法帶來厭足。頂生王領四天下、上至三十三天,仍於五欲中無有厭足,且因貪求增盛而欲害天帝;佛由此教誡,愛欲中的厭足應從聖賢智慧中求。五欲也被描述為得後歡喜、旋即「貪欲意不解」的對象,故所得不但不能止貪,反會使欲想倍增。

在修行語境中,五欲屬於繫縛與魔境界。本經稱弊魔具有色、聲、香、味、細滑五力,愚者著於其中便不能度波旬境界;聖弟子憑「無放逸力」不受五欲拘繫,因而能分別生、老、病、死,勝魔五力而至無為。相應的實踐表述包括「閉塞六情,防制五欲」、修「欲不淨想」,以及由認識五陰、五欲、愛法與染著之法,進而不再受胎及生老病死。

此外,本經常用「五欲自娛樂」或「於五欲自相娛樂」描寫人、天享樂與放逸:有人甚至以能得五欲自娛而自誇;三十三天亦被直稱「著於五欲」。這些敘事共同表明,五欲不只是五類感官對象,也特指對其世俗享受、追逐、染著而不能厭足的狀態。

Related