Dharma · AI Companion

嫉妬

īrṣyā

不喜他人获得利益荣誉的烦恼。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

An depth-interpretation of the Buddhist concept of Jealousy/Envy (*īrṣyā* / 嫉妬) written for a contemporary audience:


What Is This Concept Truly Saying?

In everyday language, we often mix up jealousy and envy, treating them as petty emotional flare-ups—a fleeting pang of bitterness when a coworker gets promoted, or a quiet resentment when an acquaintance posts about a luxury vacation. However, in Buddhist psychology (*Abhidharma*), **Jealousy (*Īrṣyā* / 嫉妬)** is recognized as a profound, toxic mental affliction (*kleśa*).

The canonical definition is precise: Īrṣyā is an unwholesome mental factor characterized by displeasure, resentment, and hostility arising specifically because another person has obtained benefits, honor, respect, or favorable treatment.

To fully comprehend *īrṣyā*, we must break down its classic scriptural mechanics, its boundary markers, and how it differs from adjacent mental states:

1. The Anomy of the Mind: How *Īrṣyā* Arises

According to the *Dīrgha Āgama* (*T0001*), jealousy does not happen in a vacuum. It sits along a strict causal chain of dependent origination (*pratītyasamutpāda*): > **Perception / Concept (*saṃjñā* / 想) $\rightarrow$ Desire (*chanda* / 欲) $\rightarrow$ Attraction & Aversion (*priya-apriya* / 愛憎) $\rightarrow$ Jealousy & Greed (*īrṣyā-mātsarya* / 貪嫉) $\rightarrow$ Conflict & Violence**

1. **Perception (*saṃjñā*): The mind recognizes and labels a situation (e.g., "They received praise, I did not"). 2. Desire (*chanda*): The mind forms a craving for exclusive ownership over approval or resource. 3. Attraction & Aversion (*priya-apriya*): Emotional polarization occurs—holding onto what pleases the self, rejecting what threatens it. 4. Jealousy (*īrṣyā*)**: When the desired object or honor goes to *another*, the mind revolts. It feels an internal burning, a hostility rooted in non-acceptance of reality. 5. Conflict: *Īrṣyā* drives outward speech and action, weaponizing relationship ties and instigating hostility.

2. The Triad of Defilements: Greed, Hostility, and Stinginess

In classical texts like the *Mādhyama Āgama* (*T0026*) and the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*T0310*), *īrṣyā* rarely operates alone. It is intricately bound with three other mental factors: * **Greed (*rāga* / 貪)**: The baseline demand to possess honor or material gain. In scriptural terms, this is often called *tān-jí* (貪嫉), highlighting that greed provides the fuel for jealousy. * **Hostility / Ill-Will (*dveṣa* / 瞋)**: *Īrṣyā* is fundamentally a subset or manifestation of *dveṣa*. When someone else prospers, the jealous mind experiences it as a personal insult or injury, reacting with resentment (*心生惡* - "arising of evil intent"). * **Stinginess (*mātsarya* / 慳)**: In the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra*, texts repeatedly pair these as *qiān-jí* (慳嫉 - Stinginess and Jealousy). *Mātsarya* is the inability to share what one has; *īrṣyā* is the inability to tolerate what *others* have. The sūtra specifically highlights *Mātsarya for Patrons/Abodes* (*他家慳 / 住家慳*)—the fear that if another monastics gains favor with a donor, one's own livelihood is compromised.

3. Root Cause: "The Fear of Not Surviving" (*Abhaya / 不活畏*)

Why does the mind react so violently to another's success? The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* exposes a profound psychological root: **Fear of Not Surviving (*不活畏*)**. At its core, jealousy is an evolutionary survival reflex misapplied to ego-identity. The delusion of a permanent "Self" (*ātman*) feels perpetually scarce and threatened. It operates on a zero-sum illusion: *If you gain, I lose; your success diminishes my existence.*

4. The Structural Marks of Jealous Behavior (*Xíng-xiàng* / 行相)

When *īrṣyā* matures into external action, the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* categorizes its dark expressions into specific operational markers: * Exclusion & Marginalization: Claiming prior ownership over relationships or spaces, accusing newcomers of "encroaching" (*侵奪*). * **The Three Faults (*三重過*)**: Out of anger, declaring one will leave a community (*住處過*), calculating and withholding kindness from close associates, and falsely attributing guilt to third parties. * **The Three Evil Words (*三惡言*)**: 1. *Slandering the Place/Donor*: Inventing dark stories about a place or patron to prevent others from going there. 2. *Inverting Truth*: Distorting the honest words of competitors into lies. 3. *Hypocritical Malice (*詐現善相*)`: Feigning friendliness on the surface while secretly hunting for tiny flaws (*尋伺破綻*) to publicly punish or expel the victim.

5. Its Location in the Path to Liberation (*Mokṣa*)

In the broader framework of the Dharma, *īrṣyā* is labeled an **"Impurity of the Practitioner" (*行苦行者穢*) and a "Foul Stench of the World" (*世間臭穢*)**.

Why is it viewed with such severity? Because *īrṣyā* acts as a instant destructive agent to spiritual growth. The scriptures state: *"Those who harbor stinginess and jealousy toward donors swiftly destroy all wholesome mental factors (*白法*), leaving nothing remaining."* It completely blocks Anumodanā (Altruistic Joy / 隨喜)—the ability to rejoice in others' goodness, which is one of the Four Immeasurables (*Brahmavihāra*). Without *Anumodanā*, the heart remains tight, defensive, and completely isolated from liberation.


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life

To see how *īrṣyā* operates today, we must look past ancient monastic halls and examine the modern landscapes of corporate offices, social media, and personal relationships.

Let us map out a standard contemporary scenario across the classical Buddhist steps of *īrṣyā*:

Scenario: The Office Promotion & Algorithmic Feeds

**Step 1: Perception (*Saṃjñā* / 想) and Desire (*Chanda* / 欲)** You have been working overtime for months on a high-stakes project. Suddenly, a colleague who joined the company after you presents a sleek deck and receives a public shout-out from executive leadership. * *Cognitive Mapping*: Your mind perceives the event (*saṃjñā*). Immediately, an underlying desire (*chanda*) for status, validation, and financial security awakens.

**Step 2: Fear of Non-Survival (*不活畏*) & Greed (*Rāga*)** A sudden wave of panic hits you. You think: *"If leadership favors them, my budget will be cut. I won't get promoted. My career is stalling."* * *Mismapping Warning*: People often think this is just "healthy career ambition" or "stress." But canonically, this is the activation of *Abhaya* (Fear of Not Surviving) mixed with *Mātsarya* (Stinginess over corporate resources/favor). You treat executive recognition as a strictly finite commodity.

**Step 3: Hostility & Resentment (*Dveṣa* / 瞋 $\rightarrow$ *Īrṣyā* / 嫉妬)** Looking at your colleague smiling in the company Slack channel, an unpleasant, burning sensation fills your chest. You feel a surge of bitterness and disgust toward their happiness. * *Canonical Definition*: This exact moment—where another’s gain directly triggers an internal sensation of displeasure and hostility (*心生惡*)—is the precise arising of Īrṣyā.

**Step 4: Expressing the Three Evil Words (*三惡言*)** Instead of observing this mental defilement, you act upon it: 1. *Slandering the Source*: In a private lunch with a coworker, you whisper, "You know executive management only likes them because they kiss up, right? That team’s culture is toxic anyway" (*说住处过* - slandering the environment/patron). 2. *Inverting Truth*: When someone praises your colleague’s data analysis, you dismiss it: "Their numbers are padded, it’s all vanity metrics" (*turning true into false*). 3. *Hypocritical Malice (*詐現善相*)*: You reply to the Slack thread with a "Congrats! 🎉" emoji, but during the next cross-functional meeting, you passively bring up a minor formatting error in their deck to undermine their credibility in front of leadership.

Common Contemporary Mismappings

1. **Confusing Jealousy (*Īrṣyā*) with Envy/Aspiration**: People often say, "I'm so jealous of your vacation!" meaning "I wish I could go too." Pure aspiration (*chanda*) to travel or improve oneself is not *īrṣyā*. *Īrṣyā* requires the element of aversion and malice toward the other person's happiness. 2. Mistaking Jealousy for "A Sense of Justice": In office politics or academia, a jealous mind frequently disguises itself as a champion of fairness: "I'm not mad they got the grant; I just care about integrity!" Sūtras highlight how *īrṣyā* selectively hunts for minor flaws (*求人短*) under the guise of righteousness to justify punishment.


Why Contemporary People Need This Concept

Modern life is engineered to be an īrṣyā-amplification machine.

1. The Algorithmic Panopticon and Comparative Anxiety

In traditional societies, you compared yourself to a few dozen peers in your village. Today, social media algorithms algorithmically curates and serves the top 1% of highlight reels—promotions, luxury travels, perfect families, aesthetic bodies—directly to your screen 24/7.

When exposed to an infinite feed of others' achievements, the untrained mind defaults to *saṃjñā* (perception) $\rightarrow$ *priya-apriya* (comparison/aversion). Because modern culture links self-worth directly to hyper-individualistic success, the underlying *fear of non-survival* (*不活畏*) is constantly triggered. We live in a state of chronic, low-grade *īrṣyā*, leaving us exhausted, irritable, and disconnected.

2. AI, Automation, and Structural Precarity

As artificial intelligence and economic shifts disrupt industries, professional survival feels increasingly fragile. When resources feel scarce, the mind naturally tilts toward *Stinginess and Jealousy* (*慳嫉*). We begin viewing collaborators as threats. Understanding *īrṣyā* allows us to recognize when our professional anxiety is devolving into toxic hostility, helping us preserve ethical boundaries even in competitive environments.

3. Neuroscience and Evolutionary Psychology: Connections and Limitations

Modern Neuroscience offers fascinating parallels to *īrṣyā*. Neuroimaging studies show that observing a rival’s success activates the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC)—the same brain region that registers physical pain. Conversely, seeing a envied rival fail activates the ventral striatum, the brain's reward center (the neural basis for *schadenfreude*).

* The Parallel: Science confirms what the Buddha taught over 2,500 years ago—jealousy literally hurts. It is a state of psychological friction and stress. * The Limitation & Difference: Evolutionary psychology frames jealousy as a fixed, hardwired mechanism for genetic and resource competition. Buddhism, however, does not treat *īrṣyā* as an unalterable trait. It views *īrṣyā* as a **conditioned, impermanent mental factor (*caitta*)** born from ignorance (*avidyā*). Because it is causally constructed, it can be systematically deconstructed and completely eradicated through wisdom (*prajñā*) and mental cultivation.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading 1: "Jealousy is just a natural human emotion; suppressing it or feeling guilty about it is unhealthy."

* Clarification: Buddhist practice never advocates for suppression or guilt. Suppressing *īrṣyā* simply buries hostility into the subconscious, where it manifests as passive-aggression (*詐現善相*). * However, "accepting that it exists" does not mean indulging or rationalizing it. The Dharma asks us to clearly discern (*vipassanā*) *īrṣyā* the moment it arises: observe its tight, painful sensation in the body, recognize it as an unwholesome state (*不善*), and see that it is burning *your own* peace of mind long before it hurts anyone else.

Misreading 2: "To avoid jealousy, I should just isolate myself or stop caring about achievement."

* Clarification: *Īrṣyā* is not caused by external achievements or other people's good fortune; it is caused by the *internal ego-grasping* that reacts to them. Running away from competitive environments without transforming the mind only transfers jealousy to smaller, niche arenas (as the sūtras note regarding monastics getting jealous over simple robes or quiet rooms).

Misreading 3: "If someone is jealous of me, it’s my fault for showing off." Or conversely: "If I am jealous, I am a bad person."

* Clarification: Buddhism separates the mental factor from the person. *Īrṣyā* is an impersonal, conditioned mental state. Having a jealous thought arise does not make a person inherently evil; it simply indicates that the seeds of self-grasping and fear are active.

Similarly, the antidote to another person's jealousy is not self-effacement, but broad, unconditioned compassion. As noted in the *Dīrgha Āgama* regarding great acts of giving: even when recipients come with minds full of jealousy and ill-will, the practitioner responds with **non-discriminatory compassion (*無分別慈悲心*)**, treating all beings with equal warmth.

The Ultimate Antidote: Rejoicing (*Anumodanā* / 隨喜)

The canonical antidote to *īrṣyā* is Anumodanā (Altruistic Joy). The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* gives a clear instruction: > "Harbor no jealous mind toward the superior qualities of others; always rejoice when others attain fame and honor." (*於人勝法無妬心,他獲名譽常歡喜*)

*Anumodanā* is the ultimate psychological hack in the Dharma. *Īrṣyā* demands: "Because they have it, I am deprived." *Anumodanā* reverses the logic: "Because they have attained happiness, virtue, or success, good exists in the world, and I can share in that joy."

By consciously practicing delight in others' success, the heart breaks out of the zero-sum illusion of the ego, clears away the "foul stench" of bitterness, and smoothly aligns itself with the boundless, unshakeable freedom of liberation.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「嫉妬」(梵语:īrṣyā)在佛教经典中被定义为一种因他人获得利益、敬重、名誉或优待,而内心产生不悦、愤恨与不平的恶劣心理状态。它被视为严重的内心垢染(「世间臭秽」)与修行者的「秽」(污垢),是阻碍众生生天、障碍解脱及法义吸收的严重烦恼。在社会伦理层面,嫉妬更是引发众生彼此结怨、冲突乃至暴力相向的根本心理源头之一。

二、主要阐述

1. 因缘起因与心理机制: 经典详细剖析了嫉妬的发生链条。在《长阿含经》中,佛陀指出「贪嫉」源于「爱憎」,爱憎源于「欲」,欲则由「想」所生。这表明嫉妬处于一个从主观认知(想)到欲望(欲)、再到情感偏好(爱憎),最终导向冲突的因缘链条中。在《大宝积经》中,嫉妬的生起被归结为「十恼」(在自我与亲友间造成三世恼害)以及对自身生存与生计的恐惧(「不活畏」)。此外,在僧团生活中,对施主供养的悭贪(「他家悭」或「住家悭」)也是引发嫉妬的核心诱因。

2. 具体表现与行相: 嫉妬的行相在僧团与日常生活中表现得极为具体。当修行者生起独占名誉或物质供养的欲望,而看见其他比丘获得这些利益时,便会「心生恶」。在《大宝积经》中,这种因「悭嫉」而产生的恶行被细化为: - 言语排挤:对来到施主家的其他比丘口出恶言,指责其「侵夺」自己的关系。 - 三重过失:包括「起住处过」(愤恨宣称要离开)、对亲近者的给予产生计较、以及对不固定施主妄加罪过。 - 三恶言:用恶事抹黑施主家(说住处过)以阻止他人居住、诬蔑他人的真话为假话、以及表面「诈现善相」暗中寻伺破绽进行治罚。 - 寻短治罚:常怀慢心与瞋恚者,会刻意寻找忍辱比丘的短处并加以驱逐或治罚。

3. 危害与恶果: 嫉妬具有极大的破坏性。在个人修行上,它能「速灭一切所有白法,永尽无遗」,使人「去法远」并障碍菩提资粮的积累。在业报上,怀有嫉妬等恶念是「世间臭秽」,会使众生「堕恶不生天」,甚至「坠三涂」(堕入三恶道),在猛火中具受极苦。在自他关系上,它会不断生长怨憎之苦,造成自、亲、非亲之间三世的恼害。

4. 对治与无妬境界: 与嫉妬相对的是「无妬」与「随喜」。修行者若能做到「无嫉妬」,其心便能如饥渴者得饮食般安立于善法中。具体修行上,应当「于人胜法无妬心」,当看见他人获得名誉时「常欢喜」随喜。同时,应通过观察嫉妬等过失会带来怨憎苦,从而生起厌患心,选择出家修行以彻底对治之。此外,在行大施舍时,应当平等对待怀有嫉妬等恶行而来的人,以无分别的慈悲心予以对待。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同经典及译本中,对于这一概念的术语表述各有侧重: - 《长阿含经》(《長阿含經》):主要使用「嫉妬」与「贪嫉」。其中「贪嫉」将贪婪与嫉妒并称,用以强调两者在引发众生暴力冲突时的协同作用。 - 《中阿含经》(《中阿含經》):主要使用「嫉妬」。经中常用动态的描述性语言「因[他人如何]故,心便生恶」来具体刻画嫉妬的心理特征。此外,针对苦行者的嫉妬,经中特称其为「行苦行者秽」。 - 《大宝积经》(《大寶積經》,唐译本):使用了更为丰富的复合词,如「憎嫉」、「悭嫉」、「嫉妬」及「妬心」。该经特别将嫉妒与对施主的悭贪结合,提出了「悭他家」或「住家悭」等特有表述,用以描绘僧团内部的利益争夺。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与「贪」和「瞋」的关系: 嫉妬常与贪、瞋交织。如「贪嫉」并称,显示贪婪是嫉妒的基础;而嫉妬本质上是一种「心生恶」与「愤恨」的表现,与瞋恚、慢心、欺妄等同属内心垢染与恶行。 2. 与「爱憎」、「欲」、「想」的关系: 在因缘链条中,嫉妬(贪嫉)是「爱憎」的直接后果,而爱憎又依附于「欲」,欲则源于「想」。 3. 与「悭」的关系: 在《大宝积经》中,嫉妬与悭惜(尤其是对施主、住处的悭贪)密不可分,合称为「悭嫉」,两者共同作用导致修行者排挤同修、毁灭善法。 4. 与其他恶法的并列: 在伦理规范中,嫉妬常与偷盗、邪婬、妄言、两舌、恶口、绮语、贪取、邪见等十恶业并列;在修行障碍中,则与谀谄、欺诳、无信、懈怠等并列,被视为非沙门的狂惑之法。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《长阿含经》:「世尊!诸天、世人、阿须罗、乾闼婆、迦楼罗及余众生,……以何怨结,使互相伤害,以刀杖相向?……佛言:『天帝!皆由贪嫉。』」 2. 《长阿含经》:「欺妄嫉妬慢,增上慢贪欲,瞋恚及与痴,是名世间臭。」 3. 《中阿含经》:「若有比丘作是念:『我当得第一座、第一食、为居士说法……』彼因余比丘得第一座、第一食、为居士说法故,心便生恶。若心生欲、心生恶,此二法俱是不善。」 4. 《中阿含经》:「彼见余沙门、梵志他人敬重、供养、礼事,见已起嫉妬,作是说:『彼何因何缘得敬重、供养、礼事?我行此苦行,何因何缘不得敬重、供养、礼事?』是谓行苦行者秽。」 5. 《大宝积经》:「众生共相憎嫉,皆由十恼之所产生,于我及我亲,作三世恼害。」 6. 《大宝积经》:「于施主家生悭嫉者,速灭一切所有白法,永尽无遗。」 7. 《大宝积经》:「于人胜法无妬心,他获名誉常欢喜。」

By SutraAI-generated

長阿含經T0001 · 阿含部

《長阿含經》論「嫉妬」見於兩處語境,一為偈頌總說煩惱,一為祭祀布施中列舉惡行,兩處皆以「嫉妬」為詞形(妬,非妒),屬後秦佛陀耶舍共竺佛念譯本之用字。

其一,偈頌將嫉妬與欺妄、慢、增上慢、貪欲、瞋恚、癡並列,統稱為「世間臭穢」。原文云「欺妄懷嫉妬,習慢增上慢,貪欲瞋恚癡,自恣藏於心」,謂此諸煩惱乃恣意藏伏於心者,非偶然外顯之過失,而是深蓄於內的染污。偈末斷以「此世間臭穢,今說令汝知,此開世間門,墮惡不生天」,明言嫉妬等煩惱之果報為開啟世間流轉之門、墮落惡趣而不得生天。此處嫉妬並非獨立展開論述,而是作為一組「臭穢」煩惱之一被提出,其定性側重在「藏於心」的隱伏性與「墮惡不生天」的果報嚴重性。

其二,在究羅檀頭經敘祀法之段落中,大臣勸王行大祀時論及布施對象,將嫉妬置於十惡業道之中:殺生、偷盜、邪婬、兩舌、惡口、妄言、綺語、貪取、嫉妬、邪見。此處之要旨非在剖析嫉妬之體性,而在論布施之平等心——經云「若有……嫉妬……邪見來在會者,亦施與,彼自當知」,又云「若有不盜,乃至正見來者,亦施與,為是故施,如是心施」。意謂行施之時,不因來者懷嫉妬等惡業而拒施,亦不因來者持正見而特施;施者之心平等無揀擇,受者之業「彼自當知」。嫉妬在此作為十惡之一,是布施所應超越的分別對象,而非被對治的所觀境。

綜觀本經兩處,嫉妬皆以列舉方式出現,未設專段釋其體相。偈頌側重其為心所藏之臭穢、感墮惡趣之因;祀法段則側重其為十惡業道之一,於布施平等義中作為不應揀擇之標記。術語形式固定作「嫉妬」,與十惡業道之「貪取」「邪見」等並行,未見異稱。

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》論嫉妬,散見於數處,各有側重,而術語形式亦不完全一致。

一、嫉妬為障道之煩惱列。經中以「諛諂、欺誑、嫉妬、無信、懈怠、無正念正智、無定無慧、其心狂惑、不護諸根、不修沙門、無所分別」為一組不善法,謂具此諸法者不堪受法;反之,「不諛諂、不欺誑、無嫉妬、有信、精進而無懈怠」者聞法,「猶飢欲得食,渴欲得飲」,又以端正女子受華鬘嚴首為喻,形容善根具足者納法之歡喜。此處嫉妬與諛諂、欺誑並列,屬聞法之障。

二、苦行者之嫉妬相。經中佛為異學無恚說「行苦行者穢」,其中一穢極具體:苦行者「若見沙門、梵志為他所敬重、供養、禮事者,便起嫉妬言:『何為敬重、供養、禮事彼沙門、梵志?應敬重、供養、禮事於我。所以者何?我行苦行。』」此即嫉妬之典型情境——見他得利養恭敬,心不甘而謂應歸於己。經中將此歸為苦行之「穢」,與自貢高、自貴賤他、往家家自稱說等同類。

三、嫉為二結之一,通一切眾生。經中天王釋問天、人、阿修羅、揵沓惒、羅剎及餘種種身各有幾結,佛答:「各各有二結,慳及嫉也。」彼等雖念「令我無杖、無結、無怨、無恚、無諍、無鬪、無苦,安樂遊行」,然以慳、嫉故,仍有刀杖鬪諍諸苦。此處用單字「嫉」而非「嫉妬」,與「慳」對舉,合稱「二結」,是《中阿含經》獨特之歸攝。

四、嫉之因緣與滅盡。天王釋追問慳、嫉從何而生,佛答:「因愛、不愛,緣愛、不愛,從愛、不愛生,由愛、不愛有。」更展轉上溯:思→念→欲→愛不愛→慳嫉→刀杖、鬪諍、憎嫉、諛諂、欺誑、妄言、兩舌,「心中生無量惡不善之法,如是此純大苦陰生」。滅則逆觀:無思則無念,無念則無欲,乃至無慳嫉則純大苦陰滅。滅戲道跡即八支聖道,正見乃至正定。此處經文用「純大苦陰」而非「純大苦蘊」,是阿含譯語之舊稱。

五、術語形式小結。本經「嫉妬」與「嫉」二形並用:列舉煩惱時作「嫉妬」,與「慳」對舉為二結時作「嫉」;因果鏈中亦作「慳、嫉」。又經中用「陰」(五陰、苦陰)而非「蘊」,用「結」而非「縛」,用「戲」(滅戲道跡)指紛爭戲論,皆為《中阿含經》東晉譯本之用語特徵。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》論「嫉妬」,散見數處短經,皆以佛在舍衛國祇樹給孤獨園告諸比丘之形式宣說,用語一律作「嫉妬」,不作「嫉妒」或「嫉忌」。

一、嫉妬為纏縛心意、牽人入惡趣之惡法。經以春時天雨大雹為喻,謂如來不出世則眾生入地獄亦復如是,而眾生入三惡趣之因,在於貪欲、睡眠、調戲三事「纏著心意」。經中更將嫉妬置於一日三時之修行警誡中:晨朝以嫉妬心而自纏縛,日中以睡眠結而自纏裹,向暮以貪欲心而自纏縛,三者令人身壞命終生三惡趣。偈頌直稱「嫉妬睡眠調,貪欲是惡法,牽人至地獄,至竟無解脫」,以「牽」字狀其業力之不可自止,復以「至竟無解脫」極言其害。此處嫉妬與睡眠、調戲、貪欲並列,屬「纏」類煩惱,經文用「纏縛」「纏裹」形容其束心之態,是其獨特用語。

二、對治之道為「去離嫉妬」與「正意」。經教比丘「當念去離嫉妬,無慳悋心,常行惠施,不著睡眠,當行不染,不著貪欲」。此處將嫉妬與慳悋對舉,以惠施為正行,顯示嫉妬在《增壹阿含經》中與慳吝同屬不欲他得之煩惱,而對治不在觀空,乃在積極行施。另一經則教「常當學正意,除去嫉妬」,以「正意」為根本,配合修行威儀、所說如法、知恩報恩、不自譽毀他等行門,構成一组完整之對治次第。

三、嫉妬之人列為「不可療治」之五種人之一。經謂諛諂、姦邪、惡口、嫉妬、無反復五者不可療治。此處嫉妬非僅一時之煩惱,而是已成人格定性者,與諂曲、惡口同列,語氣極重。「不可療治」一詞表明經中視深重嫉妬為近乎斷善根之狀態。

四、嫉妬與瞋恚、妄語並稱心不正之相。偈云「臭處不淨行,瞋恚好妄語,嫉妬心不正,如來之所說」,以「心不正」三字直接界定嫉妬之體性,並與瞋恚、妄語同歸「不淨行」,為如來所訶。

總而觀之,《增壹阿含經》論嫉妬,不作繁複之心理分析,而以譬喻(大雹)、時序(晨朝日中向暮)、人格判定(不可療治)三種方式極言其過患,對治則歸於正意、惠施、離欲,用語質直,始終作「嫉妬」,此即本經之術語形式。

Related