Dharma · AI Companion

憍慢

māna

比较自他而生高举之心AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Saying

In Buddhist psychology, Māna (憍慢, translated as pride, conceit, or arrogance) is far more than a simple personality flaw or bad manners. The Sanskrit and Pali root of *māna* literally means "to measure" or "to compare." At its deepest level, *māna* is the mental mechanism that constantly measures the self against others, inflating one's perceived status, grasping at superiorities, and refusing to yield or show genuine respect.

In early canonical literature, *māna* is classified as a fundamental mental defilement (*kilesa*), an underlying latent tendency (*mānānusaya* / 憍慢使), and a underlying "fetter" (*saṃyojana*) that binds sentient beings to the cycle of rebirth (*saṃsāra*). It is termed an "inner foulness" (*abbhantara-pūti* / 內臭穢) that corrupts the mind from within.

To understand *māna* accurately without narrowing its meaning, canonical texts break it down into explicit tiers, forms, and contexts:

1. Secular Forms of Māna: The Five External Anchors

The *Saṃyukta Āgama* (*雜阿含經*) delineates five primary secular anchors through which uninstructed worldlings form conceit: * Birth Conceit (*shēng-jiāo-màn* / 生憍慢): Arrogance based on caste, class, family background, or social status. * Lineage Conceit (*zú-xìng-jiāo-màn* / 族姓憍慢): Pride derived from one's clan name, family prestige, or social heritage. * Appearance Conceit (*róng-sè-jiāo-màn* / 容色憍慢): Conceit anchored in physical beauty, youthful looks, or facial symmetry. * Intelligence Conceit (*cōng-míng-jiāo-màn* / 聰明憍慢): Arrogance based on intellectual sharpness, worldly knowledge, or verbal skill. * Wealth Conceit (*cái-fù-jiāo-màn* / 財富憍慢): Pride rooted in financial capital, property, or material assets.

The direct interpersonal manifestation of these five secular conceits is a breakdown in reverence—specifically, feeling too elevated to show respect to parents, teachers, elders, and spiritual practitioners.

2. Degrees of Arrogance: Māna vs. Atimāna

The *Māhāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*大寶積經*) makes a precise technical distinction between two degrees of pride: * Māna (慢): Observing that one’s family, appearance, wealth, or power is *not inferior* to others ("I am as good as them"), and consequently withholding genuine respect. * Atimāna (大慢 / Great Pride): Observing that one’s qualities *exceed* those of others ("I am clearly superior to them"), generating active condescension and lack of reverence.

3. Spiritual Conceit: Dharma-Māna and Adhimāna

*Māna* does not disappear simply because one enters a monastery, practices meditation, or studies scriptures. It frequently morphs into subtle spiritual forms: * Dharma-Māna (法慢): Arising when a practitioner possesses keen intellect, eloquent teaching abilities, or deep scriptural knowledge, and uses these spiritual accomplishments to look down upon fellow practitioners. * Adhimāna (增上慢 / Overestimation / Exaggerated Conceit): In the *Māhāratnakūṭa Sūtra*, *adhimāna* is defined as a dualistic attachment (*èrbāng zhízhuó* / 二相執著) to spiritual states. It occurs when a meditator fears ignorance while craving liberation, or fears defilements while grasping at the Noble Eightfold Path. This fear-and-craving duality triggers self-elevation (*xīn jí zì gāo* / 心即自高) and idle conceptualizing, leading the practitioner to mistakenly believe they have achieved a higher spiritual realization than they actually have.

4. The Cosmic and Societal Scale: "Conceit Over Appearance" (諍色憍慢)

In the *Dīrgha Āgama* (*長阿含經*), *māna* is elevated to a cosmological principle explaining the degradation of society and the natural environment.

In the early stages of a world cycle, beings were mind-made, luminous, and sustained by joy. When they began consuming the sweet "substance of the earth" (*dì-wèi* / 地味), physical bodies formed, and differences in skin color and physical grace emerged. The moment beings looked at one another and thought, *"My appearance is superior; yours is inferior,"* "Conceit over Appearance" (*zhēng-sè-jiāo-màn* / 諍色憍慢) was born.

The canon notes a profound causality: this collective eruption of conceit and comparative rivalry caused the primordial natural bounty (*dì-wèi*, then *dì-pí*, then *dì-fū*) to vanish entirely. Beings were forced into agriculture, private hoarding, property boundaries, land disputes, theft, and state-sanctioned enforcement. Thus, *māna* is the psychological catalyst that tore humanity away from a harmonious state into a competitive, resource-scarce world.


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life

To see how *māna* operates in our modern environment—without mistaking healthy competence for defilement, or collapsing subtler forms of pride into mere "rudeness"—let us trace a typical day in an urban, algorithm-driven lifestyle.

``` [External Condition / Asset] ──► [The "Measurement" (Māna)] ──► [Interpersonal / Internal Effect] • Corporate Title • "I'm not inferior" (Māna) • Disrespect to service staff • Social Media Metrics • "My look is superior" • Objectification & Isolation • Tech/AI Literacy • "I am far better" (Atimāna) • Dismissal of traditional wisdom • Meditation Retreat Experience • "I am more evolved" (Adhimāna) • Subtle condescension to beginner ```

Scenario 1: The Morning Commute & Social Media Scroll

* The Scene: You sit on the subway checking your phone. An influencer posts about an exotic vacation; a peer posts an award win. * The Māna Mechanism: Your mind instantly begins to "measure" (*māna*). You notice your elite university background or tech job title, thinking: *"My salary and lineage are not inferior to theirs"* (Māna / 慢). Or, looking at someone's outfit, you think: *"My aesthetic sense and physical shape are vastly superior"* (Appearance Conceit / 容色憍慢). * The Trap: You might tell yourself you are just "keeping up with the industry." But internally, your heart has contracted. When an elderly person or cleaner steps onto the train, your mind, bloated with *māna*, barely registers their presence, neglecting natural courtesy (*bù shēng gōngjìng* / 不生恭敬).

Scenario 2: The Tech Workplace & AI Workflow

* The Scene: In a quarterly review, a senior colleague struggles to adapt to new digital tools or AI workflows. * The Māna Mechanism: As a tech-savvy manager, you handle the software effortlessly. A thought arises: *"I possess the intelligence and modern skill that they lack; my capacity is far superior"* (Atimāna / 大慢 & Intelligence Conceit / 聰明憍慢). * The Trap: People often confuse *māna* with actual technical skill. Skill is simply the functional ability to code or automate; *māna* is the secondary ego-puffing (*xīn jí zì gāo*) that uses skill to invalidate another human being's worth. You speak dismissively in the meeting, erecting an invisible wall between you and your team.

Scenario 3: The Mindfulness Retreat & Spiritual Self-Image

* The Scene: You complete a ten-day silent meditation retreat, experiencing a deep state of mental quietness or a glimpse of non-reactivity. * The Māna Mechanism: Returning home, you watch family members get anxious over daily chores. You think: *"I fear worldly ignorance and love equanimity; they are trapped in gross emotional turbulence while I dwell in awareness"* (Adhimāna / 增上慢 & Dharma-Māna / 法慢). * The Trap: This is the most deceptive layer of *māna*. You imagine you are practicing Buddhism, but you have converted the Dharma into an accessory for self-elevation. You listen to others with a subtle, condescending "spiritual smile." As the *Sutra of Great Accumulation* warns, by clinging dualistically to "liberation over ignorance," you have fallen into *adhimāna*.


Why Contemporary People Need This Concept

Modern society is an unprecedented engine of comparison. Social media algorithms, key performance indicators (KPIs), professional networking platforms, and wellness cultures incessantly force human beings to evaluate where they stand on the social ladder.

Contemporary culture often mislabels *māna* as "self-confidence," "personal branding," or "knowing your value." However, ancient Buddhist insight reveals the deep hidden costs of living in constant comparison:

1. Mental Exhaustion and Vulnerability: Because *māna* relies on measuring fluid, changing conditions (wealth, beauty, intelligence, status), it is inherently unstable. If your self-worth is tied to being "superior" (*sheng*) or "not inferior" (*bù liè*), any sudden loss of assets—aging, layoffs, market crashes—triggers catastrophic anxiety, depression, or rage. 2. Erosion of Relational Bonds: *Māna* isolates the individual. When you interact through the lens of comparison, you cannot truly listen, empathize, or love. You see others either as rivals to be outshone or inferiors to be ignored, destroying intimacy in personal relationships and trust in communities. 3. The "Spiritual Ego" Bottleneck: In the contemporary wellness landscape, it is easy to accumulate spiritual knowledge, yoga master certifications, or retreat credits, only to construct a thick "spiritual ego." *Māna* acts as a barrier that prevents true humility, leaving the practitioner unable to receive genuine guidance or see their own blind spots (*bù shàn gèng zēng màn*).


Common Misinterpretations & Clarifications

To apply this concept accurately in meditation and daily life, we must clear up four widespread misinterpretations:

1. Misinterpretation: "Māna is just active arrogance or bragging."

* Clarification: Bragging is merely an overt, verbal symptom. *Māna* is a fundamental mental factor (*cetasika*) that exists long before any word is spoken. Even if you remain silent, modest, and soft-spoken on the outside, if your inner mind is constantly measuring yourself against others—even silently thinking *"I am so much more humble than them"*—*māna* is fully present.

2. Misinterpretation: "Inferiority complex or self-deprecation is the opposite of Māna."

* Clarification: In Buddhist Abhidharma, feeling inferior (*ōnamāna* / 卑慢 - "I am worse than others, I am useless") is still a form of Māna. Why? Because the core disease of *māna* is the act of *measuring and self-referencing* ("How do I stack up?"). Whether the verdict is "I am better," "I am equal," or "I am worse," the mind remains obsessively anchored to an imagined, solid self (*ātman*). True liberation from *māna* is not feeling inferior, but dropping the compulsion to measure altogether.

3. Misinterpretation: "If I eradicate Māna, I will lose all motivation to achieve anything."

* Clarification: Early texts describe a highly unique, temporary pedagogical mechanism called "Relying on Conceit to Break Conceit" (*依慢斷慢 / yī màn duàn màn*). In the *Saṃyukta Āgama*, when a practitioner hears that others have attained full liberation (*arhatship*), a healthy, competitive reflection arises: *"They are human beings, I am a human being; if they can eradicate all defilements, why can't I?"*. This initial wholesome ambition uses the momentum of self-comparison to drive diligent practice. Once the practitioner penetrates truth and cuts off ignorance, this scaffolding of conceit falls away completely. Pure action is then driven by wisdom and compassion, not by ego-driven comparison.

4. Misinterpretation: "Māna can be wiped out through mere willpower or positive thinking."

* Clarification: Because *māna* is rooted in the deep illusion of a permanent self (*ātman* / 我執), willpower alone cannot dissolve it. The scriptures outline explicit, precise antidotes depending on the specific anchor of pride: * For Appearance Conceit (*恃色生憍慢*): Practice the Contemplation of Impurity (*asubha-bhāvanā* / 不淨觀), recognizing the body as a temporary vessel of organic elements (*zhòng huì qì*). * For Secular & Class Conceit: Practice Humility and Reverence (*gōngjìng qiānxià* / 恭敬謙下) toward parents, mentors, and all beings. * For Root Conceit: Contemplate Impermanence (*aniccasaññā* / 無常想) across the Five Aggregates (form, feeling, perception, mental formations, consciousness). When one deeply sees that no component of body or mind is permanent or self-existent, the ground upon which *māna* stands vanishes. * For Deeper Awakening: Contemplate Emptiness (*śūnyatā* / 空法門), Conditioned Arising (*pratītyasamutpāda* / 因緣和合), and the Signless (*animitta* / 無相法). By inquiring into the ultimate nature of mind—*"What is this pride? Whose pride is it? Who receives it?"*—one finds no solid ego, no object of pride, and realizes the primordial equality of all phenomena (*yīqiè fǎ píngděng*).

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

「憍慢」(māna)是指众生因执着于自我,依恃自身的种姓、容色、财富、智慧或修行境界等,产生自高自大、轻慢他人的内心垢染与烦恼。在经典中,憍慢被视为一种严重的“内心垢染”与“烦恼魔”。它不仅是修行者证悟佛法、获得定慧解脱的巨大障碍,也是导致世间堕落、自然资源消灭以及众生流转恶道的关键因缘。

二、 主要阐述

1. 憍慢的表现形式

经典将憍慢的变相分为世俗与修行两个层面: * 世俗层面的憍慢:众生常依恃世俗条件生起傲慢。如《長阿含經》中婆罗门自恃“最为第一,余者卑劣”的种姓憍慢;《雜阿含經》中提到的“生憍慢、族姓憍慢、容色憍慢、聰明憍慢、財富憍慢”等五种世俗憍慢,其直接表现为不敬父母、师长与尊者;以及《大寶積經》中因家庭、姓氏、容色、财富或军队等不劣于人而生的“慢”,或自认为胜于他人而生的“大慢”,以及凡夫因缺乏智慧而“恃色生憍慢”。 * 修行层面的法慢与增上慢:修行者亦会产生憍慢。如《雜阿含經》中因智慧、善于说法而在梵行中轻慢他人的“法慢”;《大寶積經》中对修行境界产生二相执着(如畏无明而喜解脱,或畏贪瞋痴而喜八圣道等)而导致的“增上慢”,这种执着会导致“心即自高”与依妄想生起憍慢。

2. 憍慢的危害与业报

* 阻碍修行与解脱:心存憍慢与欲望,则不能自调伏,不得三昧定与正受,流于放逸而无法度脱彼岸。怀慢求法者“不善更增慢”。贪著诸见、轻慢他人者如“象没深泥”,无法断除诸苦。 * 导致恶道流转与习气残留:以慢心造作诸业,死后会堕入阿修罗道,且投生人间后仍会残留强烈的“憍慢习气”。 * 诱发宇宙演化中的社会与自然退化:在《長阿含經》的宇宙论中,早期众生因食用地味、地皮、地肤而产生分别心,生起“我色胜,汝色不如”的“诤色憍慢”,直接导致了自然资源的相继消灭,最终引发社会冲突与阶级划分。

3. 对治与断除的方法

* 恭敬谦下与不净观:通过对父母、师长等尊重者“善恭敬,谦下而问讯”来对治世俗慢心;通过观察身体为“众秽器”的不净观来破除“恃色生憍慢”。 * 观照无常、无相与空性:修习“无常想”(观察五阴无常)能断除慢心;修持“无相法”与“无相正受”能灭除憍慢使;通过“空法门”或“因缘和合”之理断除慢业;作“无慢”之观照,推求无慢可得、无起慢者,体悟诸法无自性,达至平等真如。 * 依止佛力与善知识:佛陀作为“摧灭憍慢法王”,建立“正法幢”以“摧折憍慢幢”。 * 独特的“依慢断慢”机制:在《雜阿含經》中,修行者因听闻他人证果而生起好胜竞争之“慢”,以此为动力精进修行,最终断尽诸漏,称为“依慢断慢”。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

* 慢的分类与程度表述: * 《長阿含經》中常将“慢”与“增上慢”并列,并使用“吾我憍慢之心”来特指执着于自我的傲慢。 * 《雜阿含經》中将慢形容为极高之物,如“高莫过憍慢”、“慢高于虚空”;并具体细分为“生、族姓、容色、聪明、财富”五种世俗憍慢。 * 《大寶積經》则对“慢”与“大慢”进行了程度上的区分:不劣于人而不敬为“慢”,胜于他人而不敬为“大慢”;同时对“增上慢”赋予了独特的“二相执着”定义。 * 特定情境下的专属术语: * 《長阿含經》在描述世界坏劫时,独创了“諍色憍慢”一词,用以指代众生因比较肤色优劣而生的傲慢与争斗。 * 《雜阿含經》中提出了“依慢斷慢”这一独特的修行机制术语,并使用“憍慢使”来指代憍慢的烦恼随眠。 * 《大寶積經》中将憍慢称为“煩惱魔”,并使用“憍慢幢”来比喻傲慢的自高,将消除慢业的教法称为“除慢業”或“除慢法門”。

四、 与相关概念的关系

* 与“我执”的关系:憍慢源于对自我的执着。《長阿含經》称之为“吾我憍慢之心”;《大寶積經》指出通过“空法门”可以“除慢、除我、得无我解”,说明无我才能真正断除憍慢。 * 与“贪、瞋、痴、嫉妒”等烦恼的关系:憍慢常与这些根本烦恼并列。《長阿含經》将其与“欺妄、嫉妒、贪欲、瞋恚、痴”并列为世间臭秽;《大寶積經》指出对修行境界的“畏与喜”(如畏贪瞋痴、喜三解脱等二相执着)是导致增上慢的根源。 * 与“无常、无相、空”的关系:无常、无相、空是对治憍慢的智慧法门。修习“无常想”能断慢;修“无相”能灭“憍慢使”;观“空”与“因缘和合”能除慢业;观“无慢可得”能悟诸法平等。

五、 代表性原文引用

* 《長阿含經》:“欺妄懷嫉妬,習慢增上慢,貪欲瞋恚癡,此名內臭穢,自恣藏於內,墮惡不生天。” * 《長阿含經》:“若有沙門、婆羅門自恃種姓,懷憍慢心……於我法中終無所得……若能捨離種姓,除憍慢心……於我法中,得成道果。” * 《長阿含經》:“時,彼眾生食地味已……漸生麤細,顏色光澤,其色好者,生憍慢心,言:‘我色勝,汝色不如。’懷彼我慢,諍色憍慢,地味消滅。” * 《雜阿含經》:“高莫過憍慢,重莫過嫉妬。” * 《雜阿含經》:“愚癡懷憍慢,不敬於所尊……若懷憍慢心,而來問法者,不善更增慢,無能為其說。” * 《雜阿含經》:“若比丘於色常觀無常……受、想、行、識常觀無常……能斷一切欲愛、色愛、無色愛、掉、慢、無明。” * 《雜阿含經》:“姊妹!若比丘尼聞:‘某尊者、某弟子,已盡諸有漏……我今何故不盡諸有漏?’……依慢斷慢。” * 《大寶積經》:“若人自念:我父、我母、我姓、我色、我財、我軍不劣他人,不生恭敬,是名為慢。若念:我父、我母、我姓、我色、我財、我軍勝於他人,不生恭敬,是名大慢。” * 《大寶積經》:“若比丘作是思惟:我畏無明,喜於解脫……心即自高,自在攝取,依止妄想,生於憍慢,是名增上慢。” * 《大寶積經》:“何者是慢?是其誰慢?誰受是慢?……如是推求,無慢可得,無起慢者,亦無境界。……達一切法平等。”

By SutraAI-generated

長阿含經T0001 · 阿含部

《長阿含經》論「憍慢」,兼以誦偈、出家教誨、世界緣起三處敷演,術語用「慢」、「增上慢」、「憍慢」並陳,並屢以「彼我」之比較為其生起之因。

一、誦偈中之指歸。偈云:「欺妄懷嫉妬,習慢增上慢,貪欲瞋恚癡,自恣藏於心。此世間臭穢,今說令汝知,此開世間門,墮惡不生天。」()此偈以「慢」與「增上慢」並舉,與貪、瞋、癡並列,言其自恣藏於心,能開世間穢門,令造行者墮於惡趣,不生天上。「慢」泛指自恃高舉,「增上慢」則指過分之我慢,兩者並行以顯此惑之重。

二、出家修道中之教誨。佛對二婆羅門說:「今我無上正真道中不須種姓,不恃吾我憍慢之心,俗法須此,我法不爾。若有沙門、婆羅門,自恃種姓,懷憍慢心,於我法中終不得成無上證也。若能捨離種姓,除憍慢心,則於我法中得成道證,堪受正法。人惡下流,我法不爾。」()此段以「吾我憍慢之心」破斥依種姓而立之自高,明示於無上正真道中不應恃吾我而懷憍慢,必須捨離種姓高下之分別、除去憍慢之心,方得成道、堪受正法。憍慢在此經中明確定義為依自我而起之高舉心,是修道之礙,而種姓非清淨之依據。

三、世界緣起中之起源論。經敘眾生初食地味之時,「其食多者顏色轉麤,其食少者色猶光澤,於是眾生心懷彼我,生憍慢心言:『我色勝,汝色不如。』諍色憍慢故,地味消滅。更生地皮……諍色憍慢故,地皮消滅。」()至於地膚亦然:「更生地膚,轉更麤厚……於是眾生心懷彼我,生憍慢心言:『我色勝,汝色不如。』諍色憍慢故,地膚滅。」()此處之「憍慢」具體表現為以外色之比較而生之我高彼下之心,並以此「諍色憍慢」作為地味、地皮、地膚次第消失之根本動力;由此衍生田宅之分、盜竊之起與首長刑罰之制,最終連結至「生、老、病、死之原,墜墮惡趣」之憂結苦報。

綜合而言,《長阿含經》論「憍慢」,核心表述為「心懷彼我,生憍慢心」,以自我與他人之比較為其生起因緣;所用術語有「慢」、「增上慢」、「憍慢」、「吾我憍慢之心」、「諍色憍慢」等,由一般之慢至執種姓、執色相層層展開。經中以此心為修道之障與世界衰變之因:除之則得成道證、堪受正法,縱之則墮惡趣、開世間穢門。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「憍慢」,以比較自他、高舉自心為其本質。經中具體展示五種生慢所依之事:出生、族姓、容色、聰明、財富。恃此五事而起高慢者,不敬父母、諸尊、師長,故名「憍慢婆羅門」()。此即「以五事生憍慢」之典型表述。世尊見憍慢人來,偈云:「憍慢既來此,不善更增慢,向以義故來,應轉增其義」(),指出我慢來時不善更增,唯當以義轉化。憍慢婆羅門亦自問:「云何不起慢?云何起恭敬?云何善慰諭?云何善供養?」()顯示慢為當時修道者所共面對之病。

關於斷慢之方,經中提出數種進路。第一,無常觀為根本方便。經反覆以「無常想修習多修習,能斷一切欲愛、色愛、無色愛、掉、慢、無明」為教,並以田夫深耕、刈草抖擻、菴羅果落、樓閣攝受、象跡為大、諸河歸海、日出除暗、轉輪聖王最勝等八喻廣為譬喻;若比丘於空露地、林樹間正思惟觀察五蘊無常,即能斷慢()。第二,「依慢斷慢」之善巧。尊者阿難示比丘尼:聖弟子聞某尊者已盡諸有漏,便自念「我今何故不盡諸有漏」,當於爾時即能斷諸有漏——以自他比較之心反轉為精進之緣()。第三,修習無相、滅除「憍慢使」。經云:「修習於無相,滅除憍慢使,得慢無間等,究竟於苦邊」(),「使」字點出慢之繫縛義。又以偈對比未離慢者「心居憍慢欲,不能自調伏,不得三昧定,牟尼之正受……其心常放逸,於彼死魔軍,不得度彼岸」(),與已離慢者「已離於憍慢,心常入正受,明智善分別,解脫一切縛……於彼死魔怨,疾得度彼岸」(),示以正受、禪定為斷慢之定學進路。第四,斷愛及名色、除慢無所繫。經云:「斷愛及名色,除慢無所繫,寂滅息瞋恚,離結絕悕望,不見於人天,此世及他世」(),將慢與愛、名色、瞋恚並列為繫縛之根本。又以「人當莫瞋恚……於惡莫生惡,當破壞憍慢」為入賢聖眾之條件()。第五,智慧自照、以偈自警。尊者婆耆舍自以智慧起於聰明梵行者之慢,便自作厭離偈:「瞿曇莫生慢,斷慢令無餘……斷一切諸慢,起一切明處,正念於三明,神足他心智」(),示人以自覺自斷之範式。

此外,經中以「高莫過憍慢,大士無勝佛」()、「慢高於虛空」()等偈,反顯慢為凡夫最盛之煩惱。亦有「不欲起憍慢,善自調其心,未曾修寂默,亦不入正受,處林而放逸,不度死彼岸」()之誡。

術語方面,《雜阿含經》以「慢」與「憍慢」並用,並出現「憍慢使」一詞,點出慢之繫縛義。所斷之法常以「掉、慢、無明」並列(),或與愛、名色並提()。此經未見獨特異譯,與他經所用術語基本一致。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》論「憍慢」之義,主要循三條線索展開:其一,揭示其過患;其二,列示其類別;其三,明其對治。

一、過患。此經以偈直言「無憍甘露跡,放逸是死徑;無慢則不死,慢者即是死」,將慢置於與生等重的位置,視為趣向甘露之障、趣死之徑。又於舍利弗之教誡中,將「慢、增上慢」與貪、瞋、慳疾並列為「甚重之病」,指出此「二慢」不捨,則諸縛不休息、不至涅槃。佛亦曾說眾生類「恒懷憍慢,不去心首,不去須臾」,設聞正法,亦復承受而不遠離。

二、相狀。本經特別以「羊飽食屎已,還至羊群中便自貢高」之譬,形象刻畫受供養後自讚毀他之憍慢相:得利養之比丘向諸比丘自貢高云「我能得供養,此諸比丘不能得」,恰同此羊。此即概念定義中所謂「比較自他而生高舉之心」之具體寫照。

三、類別。在船筏譬喻長行中,佛明確列舉多項慢名:「依憍慢滅憍慢、慢慢、增上慢、自慢、邪見慢、慢中慢、增上慢,以無慢滅慢慢,滅無慢、正慢,滅邪慢、增上之慢,盡滅四慢」。此為此部罕見之慢之細分,且明標「四慢」之總數。於佛與波旬交戰之敘述中,又以「憍慢者」為怨敵,再列「增上慢、自慢、邪慢、慢中慢、增上慢」,並說此諸慢乃以慈、悲、喜、護、空、無願、無相七三昧之力滅之。此段以「與魔戰」之姿態展示慢之為「怨敵」,亦為此經獨特之表述側面。

四、對治。此經反覆宣說「當思惟無常想,廣布無常想,盡斷欲愛、色愛、無色愛,亦斷無明、盡斷憍慢」,喻如「以火燒草木,永盡無餘」,並以善目辟支佛拔眼示長者女、音響聖王求息等因緣,廣顯其義。

五、術語。此經以「憍慢」與「慢」並用為通名,並細分出「慢慢、增上慢、自慢、邪慢、邪見慢、慢中慢」諸目,並明示「四慢」之數,較之他經多以「我慢」概括者,術語層次尤為豐富。

Related