Dharma · AI Companion

duḥkha

身心受逼迫而不自在的状态。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

初立第一重 逼迫不自在之苦谛,破实有安乐执、导入无常缘生;究竟第四重 天台四种四谛推至无作四谛「阴入皆如,无苦可舍」〔天台圆教〕〔声闻:唯生灭四谛之苦,不通此读〕。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

Here is a deep, comprehensive, and accessible interpretation of the Buddhist concept of "Suffering" (苦), tailored for the contemporary reader.


We often hear that Buddhism teaches "life is suffering," and immediately, a defensive wall goes up. We think of our cozy weekends, a good cup of coffee, or the laughter of our children, and we instinctively reply: *“Life isn't all bad. Isn't this a bit pessimistic?”*

This reaction stems from a fundamental translation problem. When the Buddha spoke of 苦 (Duḥkha), he wasn't just talking about weeping, physical pain, or tragedy. In the context of the Path of Liberation (解脱道), understanding *Duḥkha* is not a mandate to be miserable; it is the ultimate medical diagnosis of the human condition. It is the very first step of awakening. If you do not understand how the trap works, you can never step out of it.

Let us explore this concept not as a dictionary entry, but as a living reality.

这个概念在说什么 (What is this concept talking about?)

In the classical scriptures like the *Madhyama Agama* (《中阿含经》) and the *Samyukta Agama* (《杂阿含经》), 苦 (Duḥkha) is defined as the state of oppression (逼迫), feverish affliction (热恼), and fundamental lack of autonomy (不自在) arising from impermanence, desire, and conditional bondage.

The sutras summarize its essence with surgical precision: *"Whatever is felt and done is suffering"* (所觉所为,即皆是苦) and *"Whatever is impermanent is suffering"* (无常法即是苦).

To unpack this, the Buddha categorized *Duḥkha* into the famous Eight Kinds of Suffering (八苦): 1. The Biological Reality: The suffering of Birth (生苦), Aging (老苦), Sickness (病苦), and Death (死苦). 2. The Social and Psychological Reality: * Separation from what we love (爱别离苦): The pain of parting with dear ones, youth, or cherished possessions. * Encountering what we hate (怨憎会苦): Being forced to endure environments, people, or situations we despise. * Not getting what we want (求不得苦): The frustration of unfulfilled desires, or the futile wish to make fleeting pleasures last forever.

But the Buddha didn't stop at these easily recognizable pains. He introduced the eighth, the most profound and encompassing category, which ties the previous seven together: 3. The Suffering of the Five Clinging-Aggregates (略五盛阴苦 / 五取蕴苦): This is the core of Buddhist psychology. A human being is not a solid "self," but a temporary collection of five aggregates (五蕴 - *Wuyun* or 五受阴 - *Wushouyin*): * Form (色 - Rūpa): All physical matter. *Crucial note: This is not just your "flesh and blood." It includes your body, but also the external environment—the screen you are looking at, the chair you sit on, the sound waves hitting your ear.* * Feeling (受 - Vedanā): The immediate sensation of an experience as pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral. * Perception (想 - Saṃjñā): The mental function of taking in features and recognizing/labeling them (e.g., "This is an apple," "This is a threat"). It is *not* just "having a thought." * Volition / Mental Formations (行 - Saṃskāra): Willpower, urges, and mental construction. It is the inner psychological drive, not external physical actions. * Consciousness (识 - Vijñāna): The base awareness that cognizes the presence of an object.

Because these five aggregates and the six sense faculties (eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, mind) are constantly shifting and entirely out of our ultimate control, they are inherently oppressive. To warn his disciples, the Buddha used chilling, 1-to-1 metaphors. He likened the body and the five aggregates to an illness (病), a carbuncle (痈), a thorn or poisonous arrow (刺/箭), a murderer (杀), a venomous snake (蛇), and an enemy (怨家). We cling to these aggregates thinking they are our refuge, only to realize we are embracing an assassin.

Furthermore, the *Maharatnakuta Sutra* (《大宝积经》) offers a brilliant observation: The Four Postures are all suffering (四威仪皆苦). Walking, standing, sitting, and lying down are all fundamentally *Duḥkha*. Why? Because if you walk for too long, it becomes agonizing. You stop and stand, and you feel a rush of "pleasure." But the sutra points out that this is an illusion—you are merely *"exchanging suffering for suffering"* (舍苦求苦). The standing eventually becomes painful, so you sit. You sit too long, you must lie down. What we call "pleasure" is often just the temporary relief from a preceding pain.

生活里的走查 (A Walkthrough in Daily Life)

Let’s step out of the ancient texts and into a modern Tuesday evening.

Imagine you are commuting home after a grueling day of overtime. The subway is packed. You pull out your smartphone to scroll through short videos. Let’s map the Suffering of the Five Clinging-Aggregates right here, strictly according to the classical definition:

* Form (色): The physical tension in your cervical spine from looking down, the stale air in the subway car, the blinding light of the OLED screen. (Remember: Form is *both* your physical body and the material environment). * Feeling (受): A brief, pleasant sensation (乐受) when a funny video plays, immediately followed by an unpleasant sensation (苦受) when your phone displays a "Low Battery" warning. * Perception (想): Your mind recognizes the battery icon, associates it with past experiences of being disconnected, and labels it: "Disaster / Anxiety." * Volition (行): The immediate, panicked urge to search your bag for a power bank. The willpower exerted to keep your eyes open even though you are exhausted. * Consciousness (识): The underlying awareness that is frantically jumping between the screen, the battery icon, and the subway station announcements.

You finally arrive home and collapse onto the sofa. *"Ah, this is happiness!"* you think. But remember the *Maharatnakuta Sutra’s* "Four Postures." Are you truly experiencing absolute joy? No. You are just experiencing the cessation of the suffering of standing on the subway. Give it three hours of lying on that sofa without moving, and you will develop back pain and bedsores. You are merely *exchanging the suffering of standing for the suffering of lying down*.

Where we get it wrong: We think *Duḥkha* only happens when we are crying over a breakup (Separation from what we love / 爱别离) or dealing with a toxic boss (Encountering what we hate / 怨憎会). But the deepest *Duḥkha* is that even the funniest TikTok video, the most delicious meal, and the warmest embrace are all governed by impermanence (无常). Because they will end, and because you will crave them again, your mind is held hostage. You are *not free* (不自在).

当代人为什么需要它 (Why do contemporary people need it?)

We need the concept of *Duḥkha* now more than ever because we live in an era where Desire/Craving (爱欲)—the root cause of suffering, as the *Samyukta Agama* points out—is algorithmically weaponized.

The sutras state: *"All suffering of sentient beings is rooted in desire"* (众生所有苦生,彼一切皆以欲为本). Today, tech platforms employ brilliant engineers to study human behavior, creating infinite scrolls and variable rewards to keep us hooked. We are trapped in a high-speed cycle of *Not getting what we want* (the FOMO of missing a trend) and *Separation from what we love* (the fleeting high of a purchase fading the moment it arrives).

We can look at this through the lens of contemporary neuroscience. When we encounter a stimulus we desire, our brain releases dopamine. However, after the peak, dopamine levels drop *below* the baseline, creating a neurological deficit—a literal craving. We scroll again not to feel good, but to stop feeling bad. *A necessary caveat: Neuroscience brilliantly maps the biological mechanisms of craving, but it does not equate to the Dharma. Science describes the exact dimensions of the cage; the Buddha’s teachings offer the blueprint to dismantle it. Science aims to optimize our existence within the cycle; Buddhism aims for total liberation from it.*

Understanding *Duḥkha* gives contemporary people radical clarity. When you realize that your anxiety, burnout, and dissatisfaction are not necessarily personal failures, but the objective, mechanical nature of a conditioned world, you stop blaming yourself. You stop demanding permanent perfection from a world designed to decay.

常见误读与澄清 (Common Misreadings and Clarifications)

Misreading 1: "If everything is suffering, Buddhism is just dark, pessimistic nihilism." *Clarification:* Acknowledging *Duḥkha* is not pessimism; it is medical realism. If you have an arrow in your chest, ignoring it is foolish. The Buddha explicitly rejected the idea of wallowing in misery. The goal of recognizing suffering is the Cessation of Suffering (苦灭). By cultivating the Eightfold Path, attaining an unmoving mind, and seeing reality clearly (真实正观), one extinguishes craving. When desire ends, suffering ends—a state the sutras joyfully call "reaching the end of suffering" (作苦边).

Misreading 2: "If I practice harsh discipline and punish myself, I can pay off my karmic debt and end suffering." *Clarification:* This is a very common trap, even today (think of extreme hustle culture or punishing diet regimens). In the *Madhyama Agama*, the Buddha fiercely criticized the Niganthas (尼乾子, the Jains) for this exact view. The Buddha used the metaphor of a poisoned arrow: cutting open the wound to pull out the arrow hurts terribly, but the pain leads to healing. However, blind self-mortification without wisdom is just inflicting pointless agony upon oneself in the present life. True liberation requires the Middle Way, relying on wisdom, not self-torture.

Misreading 3: "Suffering is an absolute, solid reality." *Clarification:* For the beginner, suffering feels terribly real. But as the practitioner deepens their insight into emptiness, the perspective shifts. In the *Maharatnakuta Sutra*, standing at the ultimate vantage point of the Dharma Realm (究竟法界), the Buddha reveals a breathtaking truth: Because there is no inherent, independent "self" (无众生), there is ultimately no one who suffers. The Four Noble Truths are provisional teachings. Ultimately, *"all sufferings are like a dream"* (诸苦犹如梦).

The concept of *Duḥkha* is the ultimate wake-up call. It is a warm, firm hand on your shoulder, gently telling you: *Stop trying to build a permanent mansion on a frozen lake. The ice is melting. It is time to step onto the solid ground of awakening.*

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

苦(duḥkha)是佛陀阐释的核心概念之一,指众生身心因无常变坏、爱欲执取及因缘束缚而产生的逼迫、热恼与不自在状态。在《中阿含经》中,苦的本质被概括为“所觉所为,即皆是苦”,“无常法即是苦”。而在《杂阿含经》中,色、受、想、行、识等五受阴及六入处皆是无常之法,因为无常,所以必然带来“逼迫苦”。在《大宝积经》中,则进一步指出六根、六境、五蕴及六界等“自性是苦”,并强调“若无常即是苦”。

二、主要阐述

1. 苦的分类与具体表现 各经对苦的分类进行了多维度的细致描绘。最经典的是“八苦”,即生苦、老苦、病苦、死苦、怨憎会苦(或恩爱别离苦)、爱别离苦、所求不得苦、略五盛阴(或五取蕴、五受阴)苦。其中,生、老、病、死等苦表现为众生身心经历苦受、热受及壮热烦恼忧慼受;所求不得苦是指对生、老、死、忧慼之法欲令不生、不忧慼而不可得,或欲令可爱的生乐常恒久住而不可得。 《大宝积经》还提出了“十苦事逼迫”,包括生、老、病、死、愁、怨恨逼迫、苦受逼迫、忧受逼迫、痛恼逼迫,以及生死流转大苦。此外,该经还生动描述了胎儿在母腹中受到的“胎狱之苦”,以及人身常受的“四百四病”等病苦。特别地,《大宝积经》提出了“四威仪皆苦”的独特观点,指出五阴身在行、住、坐、卧四种威仪中,若长时行而不息即是苦,其余威仪亦然,众生因长时行而暂住、长时坐而暂卧,便“妄生乐想”,实际上“实无有乐”,只是“舍苦求苦”。

2. 苦的因缘与集起 苦并非凭空产生,而是由因缘合会而生,无因缘则灭。苦的根本在于“爱欲”。如《中阿含经》指出“此爱当受未来有,与喜欲俱,愿彼彼有”;《杂阿含经》亦云“众生所有苦生,彼一切皆以欲为本”。在因缘流转中,苦的集起遵循“此有故彼有,此起故彼起”的缘起法则,由无明缘行,乃至纯大苦聚集。此外,《中阿含经》描述了“苦为信之习,老死为苦之习……爱为受之习,觉为爱之习,更乐为觉之习”的流转过程。若对法有所受取、取著,则会生起怖畏与苦恼。

3. 轮回之苦 《杂阿含经》以宏大的时空视角描绘了众生在“无始生死”中的长夜之苦。众生因“无明所盖,爱系其颈(首)”,在五趣中常转不息,不知“苦之本际”。众生在漫长轮回中因身体破损所流的血、因丧失亲人所流的泪,多于恒河水与四大海水,累劫积聚的身骨高如大山。此外,因造作恶业而堕入恶趣(如地狱、饿鬼、傍生或阎罗界),或在人间承受各种极度痛苦折磨,皆是惨烈的果报。

4. 苦的息灭与超越 修行者应当通过修习禅定,得不动心,如实知苦、知苦习、知苦灭、知苦灭道(即八正道或八支圣道),方能断欲解脱。修行者需对五受阴及六入处进行“真实正观”,了知其无常、苦、空、非我、非我所,从而生起厌离,因厌离而喜贪尽,因喜贪尽而心得解脱。当爱欲灭尽时,苦即灭尽,这被称为“作苦边”。 《大宝积经》则从究竟法界的高度指出,因为“无众生”,所以“苦谛亦无”,四圣谛皆是“分别虚妄非有”,诸苦自性本无生,犹如梦境。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典和译本中,对于“苦”及相关概念的术语使用存在显著的差异: 1. 五蕴的称呼: - 《中阿含经》译为“五阴”或“盛阴”(如“兴起五阴”、“略五盛阴苦”),并具体列为“色盛阴,觉、想、行、识盛阴”。 - 《杂阿含经》系统地使用“五受阴”(色、受、想、行、识受阴)。 - 《大宝积经》则使用“五阴”或“五阴身”,并将除色蕴之外的其余四蕴合称为“四阴”。 2. 受与触的译词: - 《中阿含经》以“觉”代指“受”;以“更乐”或“更触”代指“触”(如“因更乐则便有欲”、“更乐为习”)。 3. 无我的译词: - 《中阿含经》以“非神”代指“无我”(如“无常则苦,苦则非神”、“是空、是非神”)。 4. 十二处的译词: - 《杂阿含经》以“入处”或“六触入处”指代“十二处”。 5. 苦的尽头: - 《中阿含经》与《杂阿含经》皆提及“苦边”,分别表述为“是说苦边” 与“作苦边”。 6. 流转受苦处所: - 《大宝积经》提及流转受苦的处所为“阎罗界”。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 苦与无常、无我(非神): 无常是苦的必然结果。各经反复强调“无常即苦”,“若无常即是苦”。因为无常,所以必然带来逼迫。而苦又与无我紧密相连,如“无常则苦,苦则非神”,“无常苦空非身”。经中常将身或五受阴比喻为“病、痈、是箭、是蛇、是无常、是苦、是空、是非神” 或“病、痈、刺、杀”、“怨家”。 2. 苦与爱欲、执取: 爱欲是苦的集起因缘。众生因爱欲、贪求而生定执,进而造作不善业,由此产生众苦。凡是对五受阴或入处生起爱喜、贪著的人,就是对苦生起爱喜,因而无法解脱。 3. 世间苦与圣法苦的类比: 《中阿含经》以世间贫穷、举贷、长息、被债主索债和收缚为“大苦”,类比在圣法中无信、无戒、无闻、无施、无慧为“不善贫穷”,身口意恶行为“不善举贷”,覆藏恶行为“不善长息”,其恶业最终导致地狱之缚,此为“最甚苦”。 4. 在家与出家的苦乐辩证: 《中阿含经》指出,在家者以“不自在”(钱财不增)为苦,以“自在”为乐;出家学道者则以“自在”(行随欲、恚、痴)为苦,以“不自在”(行不随欲、恚、痴)为乐。 5. 对邪见苦行的批判: 《中阿含经》批判了尼乾子认为通过苦行受苦可以灭除故业以达苦尽的邪见。佛陀以“身被毒箭”开疮拔箭虽极苦但最终平复的譬喻,指出尼乾子自无净智,其上中下苦行只是在现世自作极重之苦,并不能真正息苦。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《中阿含经》:“无常则苦,苦则非神”;“所觉所为,即皆是苦”。 2. 《杂阿含经》:“苦者,谓生苦、老苦、病苦、死苦、恩爱别离苦、怨憎会苦、所求不得苦。略说五受阴苦,是名为苦。”;“众生所有苦生,彼一切皆以欲为本,欲生、欲集、欲起、欲因、欲缘而苦生。” 3. 《大宝积经》:“若无常即是苦”;“观爱因缘已,众苦则不生”;“诸苦犹如梦”。

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

本經論「苦」之核心表述見於佛告生聞梵志一節:在家者以「不自在」為苦,出家學道者以「自在」為苦——在家若錢財不增則憂苦愁慼,出家若行隨欲恚癡亦憂苦愁慼。此正契「苦為身心受逼迫而不自在之狀態」之義。又說「所覺所為即皆是苦」,直言一切所覺所為皆是逼迫之相。

本經沿用佛教傳統七苦之列舉:生苦、老苦、病苦、死苦、怨憎會苦、愛別離苦、所求不得苦,並總說「略五盛陰苦」。值得留意者,本經以「五盛陰」稱之,而非「五陰」或「五蘊」,是此經獨特用詞。又以「苦惱、極憂慼」形容身心逼迫之相,以「苦邊」表苦之究竟斷處,以「淳大苦陰」總稱苦聚。

於三覺中,本經以「苦覺」與「樂覺、不苦不樂覺」並列,說「三覺無常法、苦法、滅法,無常法即是苦」。又從無常以釋苦:色、覺、想、行、識皆無常,「無常則苦,苦則變易」。凡夫「見我是我而著於我」,唯有以正見觀「無常、苦、空、非我」方得解脫。

就四聖諦結構而言,本經反覆以「知苦如真、知苦習、知苦滅、知苦滅道如真」為完整教說,並明言「苦、苦習、苦滅、苦滅道跡」是世尊一向所說之法,八支聖道為苦滅道。

於緣起法中,本經以「信為習……苦為習」上溯:苦習為老死,老死習為生,乃至愛習為覺、覺習為更樂;「愛滅苦便滅」。可知苦在十二緣起中由愛所生。

本經亦破尼乾等苦行斷苦之執,以毒箭喻:箭醫以利刀開瘡、拔金、纏裹,步步皆生極苦,喻示其說「即於現世作苦」。又說「欲者無常、虛偽、妄言」「欲一向無樂,無量苦患」,以欲為苦之淵藪。

於斷苦之方,本經云:心若出外灑散、不住內則恐怖;若心住內、不出不散、不受不恐怖,則「不復生、老、病、死,是說苦邊」。證四禪已便「知此苦如真」,「欲漏、有漏、無明漏心解脫」,「生已盡,梵行已立,所作已辦,不更受有」,即是苦之究竟解脫,稱為「已得脫一切苦」。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

在劉宋求那跋陀羅譯的《雜阿含經》(屬於阿含部)中,「苦」被闡釋為有情身心受逼迫而不自在的狀態。本經對「苦」的論述極為系統且深刻,涵蓋了苦的本質、表現、因緣、輪迴中的慘烈程度,以及徹底解脫苦的方法。

一、 獨特術語與概念界定 《雜阿含經》在論述「苦」時,使用了其獨特的術語體系。例如,本經普遍以「五受陰」(或「五陰」)來稱呼「五蘊」;以「六觸入處」或「六入處」來稱呼「六處」;並以「究竟苦邊」或「作苦邊」來指稱痛苦的徹底邊際與解脫。此外,本經將五受陰的「無常、苦、變易法」定義為「世間世間法」。

二、 苦的本質與表現 1. 無常即苦與受逼迫性:本經強調「無常即苦」。色、受、想、行、識這五受陰,以及眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意等入處皆是無常的。正因為其無常,所以必然會帶來「受逼迫苦」。若五受陰是常,則不應有病、有苦生,正因其無常,才有病與苦的逼迫。 2. 苦的具體範疇:本經具體定義「苦」為:生苦、老苦、病苦、死苦、恩愛別離苦、怨憎會苦、所求不得苦,並將其歸納為「略說五受陰苦」。 3. 一切皆苦與受悉是苦:本經指出「受有者苦」,將受生、存在(受有)比喻為糞屎,不論多少皆是臭穢,因此不讚歎任何存在。凡是無常、有為、思願緣生之法,其生、住、滅及數數出生「一切皆苦」,「其生則苦生,住亦即苦住」。因為諸行無常、是變易法,故說「受悉苦」。甚至連轉輪聖王之位,本質上亦是無常、苦、空、非我。 4. 聖凡對苦樂的顛倒認知:世間凡夫以五欲及意入處為樂,但當其變易滅盡時便產生大苦;唯有賢聖能觀察世間所樂皆是怨家,視其滅為樂。愚者以生子為樂,實則生子常得苦。

三、 苦的因緣(苦因) 1. 以愛欲為根本:本經反覆強調,眾生種種苦生,皆以「欲」或「愛欲」為根本,因欲而生、而集、而起。對五受陰或六入處產生愛喜,即是對苦愛喜,便無法脫離痛苦。 2. 億波提與動搖:苦的生起是由於「億波提」(依恃/取)與「愛」。此外,「動搖」(不穩定)與「愛」也是病、癰、刺,是苦的來源。 3. 緣起中道:本經明確拒絕了苦是「自作」、「他作」、「自他共作」或「無因作」的邪見,而以「中道緣起」來解釋苦的集聚,即「此有故彼有,此起故彼起」,由無明緣行,乃至純大苦聚集。

四、 無始生死與輪迴之苦 眾生在無始生死中長夜輪轉,不知「苦之本際」。本經以極具震撼力的譬喻描述輪迴之苦:眾生因身體破壞所流的血,以及因喪失親人所流的淚,皆遠多於四大海水;一人在一劫中所積聚的遺骨,高如大山;眾生在五趣輪中常轉不息,若因惡業墮入地獄或畜生、餓鬼,則要承受如無皮肉段、火燒其體、鐵磨轉頂等無量慘烈的劇苦。

五、 斷苦與究竟苦邊的途徑 1. 如實觀察五受陰:多聞聖弟子應當精勤思惟,觀察五受陰「如病、如癰、如刺、如殺,無常、苦、空、非我、非我所」。 2. 斷除愛欲與知苦:對色等五受陰及六入處若能「若知、若明、若斷、若離欲」,則能斷苦。愛盡則苦盡,即能「作苦邊」。 3. 修習八正道:修習八正道是斷除痛苦、究竟得解脫的唯一道跡。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》論「苦」之要點

一、四諦框架之特殊用語

此經以四聖諦貫通全經,但用詞獨特。四諦或作「苦、習、盡、道」——以「習」代「集」,以「盡」代「滅」;或展開為「苦、苦習、苦盡、苦出要」,以「出要」表示出離苦之要道;又或作「知苦、知習、知盡、知道」。此與他經通稱之「苦、集、滅、道」用字有別。

二、「五盛陰」之特殊名稱

此經以「五盛陰」作為五蘊之通稱(間亦用「五陰」「五受陰」「盛陰」),此乃本經之用語特色。其核心公式為:「色者無常,無常者即是苦,苦者即是無我,無我者即是空;痛、想、行、識亦復如是」,並言五盛陰「無常、為苦、為惱、為多痛畏」。

三、苦之多重內涵

(一)色、痛之患:此經反覆申說「色為大患」「痛為大患」,列種種不淨觀境與「痛者無常、變易之法」之理。

(二)愛別離、怨憎會之苦:經中波斯匿王與摩利夫人往復論議,明言「恩愛別離、怨憎合會,無歡樂心」「恩愛別離,此皆是苦」。

(三)懈惰、無福為苦之根本:佛告諸比丘「懈惰為苦,作諸惡行,於事有損」;又言「無福」即「苦之原本,愁憂苦惱不可稱記,無有愛樂」。

(四)生為苦:佛告舍利弗:「一生、二生猶尚苦難,何況流轉終始而可甘處?由有有生,由生有老,由老有病,有死、愁、憂、苦、惱,何可貪樂,便成五盛陰身」。

(五)地獄楚毒之苦:經文詳述地獄種種酷刑,「苦痛難計,求死不得」;又述提婆達兜受苦之狀。

(六)恩愛無明為苦惱之因:偈云「恩愛無明本,興諸苦惱患,彼滅而無餘,便無復有苦」。

(七)病苦之逼惱:尊者須菩提「身得苦患,甚為沈重」,思惟「我此苦痛為從何生,復從何滅,為至何所」。

四、斷苦之歸趨

此經以「盡於苦際」「便盡除苦,後無有憂」「盡生死,無有苦原本」「當盡於苦本,長離去八難」「漸盡苦原」「便無復有苦」等語標示出離苦之目標,並頌「彼能施安隱,除去諸苦惱」。

五、其他相關論述

此經亦明「一切諸行苦」為四法本末之一;六十二見皆「無常、苦、空」。

總結:《增壹阿含經》以「苦、習、盡、道」之四諦用詞、「五盛陰」之五蘊異名,及「色者無常,無常者即是苦」之標準公式為其術語特色;其「苦」之內涵涵蓋色痛之患、愛別離怨憎會、懈惰無福、生死流轉、地獄楚毒、恩愛無明、病患逼惱等多重面向,並以「漸盡苦原」為究竟目標。

Related