Dharma · AI Companion

dṛṣṭi

对事理所持的见解或观点。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

初立第一重:阿含/阿毘達磨已完整安立「见」之法相(身见、边见、邪见、六十二见等见论税目),非至般若方立;第二重〔般若:诸见即戏论,所破一向〕为中途深化;究竟第四重〔禅:知见立知即无明本,离一切见之无见而见〕。「正见」义属 samyag-drsti 类专条(若词表有则各安其位),不据以另改本条。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

这个概念在说什么 (What This Concept Means)

In early Buddhist thought, "View" (*Jiàn* / 見; Sanskrit: *dṛṣṭi*) is far more than a passive intellectual opinion or a personal taste. It is the underlying cognitive lens, perspective, and orientation toward oneself, the world, and ultimate truth. In the Early Buddhist Texts (such as the *Saṃyukta Āgama* and *Madhyama Āgama*), *Jiàn* is described as the foundational engine of human existence: it directs intention, shapes speech and action, dictates karma (*yè* / 業), and ultimately decides whether one drifts through endless cycles of suffering or arrives at liberation.

To understand *Jiàn* deeply, we must unpack its three primary manifestations in the sūtras:

1. Worldly Views and Wrong Views (*Xié-jiàn* / 邪見 or *È-jiàn* / 惡見)

Unenlightened existence is dominated by skewed views that anchor the mind in friction. These manifest in three major forms: * **Self-Grasping (*Jì-yǒu-shén* / 計有神, *Jì-yǒu-zhòng-shēng* / 計有眾生):** Reifying a solid, enduring entity—conceiving that there is a permanent soul (*shén* / 神), a fixed living being (*zhòng-shēng* / 眾生), a person (*rén* / 人), a soul-life (*shòu* / 壽, *mìng* / 命), or a substantial world (*shì* / 世). * **Nihilism and Denial of Cause (*Wú-yīn wú-yuán* / 無因無緣):** Claiming that suffering, ignorance, or wisdom happen without cause or condition ("無因、無緣眾生無智、無見"), thereby denying moral efficacy, cause and effect, and the possibility of intentional transformation. * **The Illusion of Unhindered Omniscience (*Cháng wú-ài zhī-jiàn* / 常無礙知見):** Non-Buddhist teachers often claimed to possess total, uninterrupted omniscience while walking, standing, sleeping, or awake ("無餘知、無餘見"). The Buddha refuted this by pointing out empirical reality: these teachers still tripped over ditches, encountered wild beasts, and had to ask for directions. The Buddha clarified that no practitioner possesses a state where they "know all things and see all things simultaneously" (*Yǒu yī-shí zhī yī-qiè, yī-shí jiàn yī-qiè* / 有一時知一切,一時見一切).

2. The Twofold Architecture of Right View (*Zhèng-jiàn* / 正見 or *Shàn-jiàn* / 善見)

The sūtras systematically divide Right View into two distinct tiers: * **Mundane Right View (*Shì-sú zhèng-jiàn* / 世俗正見):** Defined as *"worldly, with taints, with clinging, leading toward good realms"* (世、俗,有漏、有取,轉向善趣). This is the functional acceptance of cause and effect: believing in the value of generosity (*shī-shě* / 施捨), ethical discipline (*zhāi-jiè* / 齋戒), teaching (*shuō-fǎ* / 說法), and acknowledging that liberated beings (Arahants / *Ā-luó-hàn*) exist in the world (*zì-zhī bù-shòu hòu-yǒu* / 自知不受後有). * **Supramundane Right View (*Chū-shì-jiān zhèng-jiàn* / 出世間正見):** Defined as *"noble, supramundane, taintless, without clinging, completely ending suffering, leading to the limit of suffering"* (聖、出世間,無漏、不取,正盡苦,轉向苦邊). This is not mere belief, but active, penetrative wisdom (*zhì-huì* / 智慧) reflecting on the Four Noble Truths (*Sì-shèng-dì* / 四聖諦). It operates through distinct cognitive faculties: 1. *Selection and investigation* (*Zě-fǎ, fēn-bié tuī-qiú / fēn-bié qiú-jué* / 選擇、分別推求/分別求覺) 2. *Sharp discernment* (*Jué-zhī xiá-huì / qiǎo-biàn xiá-huì* / 覺知黠慧/巧便𭶑慧) 3. *Penetrative observation* (*Kāi-jué guān-chá* / 開覺觀察).

3. The Metaphor of the Seeds (*Kǔ-zhǒng* vs. *Gān-tián zhǒng-zi*)

The sūtras preserve a precise, unyielding metaphor for how views dictate our lives: * **The Bitter Seed (*Kǔ-zhǒng* / 苦種):** If a person holds Wrong View (*Xié-jiàn*), every act of body, speech, and mind—along with their desires, vows, and pursuits—becomes aligned with that bitter seed. Even when nourished by soil, water, fire, and wind, the fruit it yields will inevitably be unlovely, disagreeable, and bitter. * **The Sweet Seed (*Gān-tián zhǒng-zi* / 甘甜種子):** If a person holds Right View (*Zhèng-jiàn*), like planting sugar cane, rice, wheat, or grapes, all bodily, verbal, and mental actions aligned with it will naturally mature into sweet, delightful, and agreeable fruit.

Position in the Path to Liberation

In the Noble Eightfold Path (*Bā-zhèng-dào* / 八正道), Right View comes first because it acts as the rudder. In the Twelve Links of Dependent Origination (*Shí-èr yīn-yuán* / 十二因緣), *Jiàn* operates alongside mental defilements (*fán-nǎo* / 煩惱), craving (*ài* / 愛), self-conceit (*màn* / 慢), and ignorance (*wú-míng* / 無明) to drive mental formations (*xíng* / 行) and perpetuate cyclic existence.

To completely abandon wrong views, one must practice "Gradual Reduction" (*Jiàn-sǔn* / 漸損)—a systematic path that includes entering meditative absorptions (*jhāna* / 禪定), surpassing form perceptions (*dù yī-qiè sè-xiǎng* / 度一切色想), mastering formless attainments, abandoning mental unwholesomeness, and ultimately realizing the "complete, residual-less cessation of all phenomena" (*zhū-fǎ miè-jìn wú-yú* / 諸法滅盡無餘).


生活里的走查 (Walkthrough in Daily Life)

To see how *Jiàn* operates, let us walk through four common contemporary scenarios, mapping them strictly against canonical definitions and pointing out where we frequently misidentify our experience.

Scenario 1: Late-Night Phone Scrolling & Identity Anxiety

* The Experience: It is 1:00 AM. You are endlessly scrolling through LinkedIn or social media, reading about AI disruptions or peers achieving major career milestones. A deep tightness grips your chest: *"I am falling behind; my future security is collapsing."* * Canonical Mapping: This anxiety is fueled by the core Wrong View of Substantial Self-Grasping (*Jì-yǒu-rén, jì-yǒu-shòu, jì-yǒu-mìng* / 計有人、有壽、有命). You view your career and identity as a permanent asset (*rén* / 人; *shòu* / 壽) that must be preserved against an external world (*shì* / 世). * Common Mis-mapping: Modern culture tells us: *"You just have low self-esteem or poor time management."* We mistake *Jiàn* for a mere emotional mood. In reality, the emotional friction is the direct "bitter fruit" (*kǔ-guǒ* / 苦果) produced by the underlying "bitter seed" (*kǔ-zhǒng* / 苦種)—the unexamined assumption that there is a static "I" whose permanent happiness can be secured through social status.

Scenario 2: Workplace Burnout and Cynicism

* The Experience: After a project fails due to office politics, you throw up your hands: *"Ethics are a joke. Hard work doesn't matter; it's all random luck and kiss-ass politics. Why bother being honest?"* * Canonical Mapping: This is the classical Wrong View of Denying Causality (*Wú-yīn, wú-yuán* / 無因、無緣). By declaring that actions have no intrinsic moral or causal alignment, you plant a bitter seed. Consequently, your daily speech (*xié-yǔ* / 邪語), work conduct (*xié-yè* / 邪業), and career choices (*xié-mìng* / 邪命) align with cynicism. The result is an isolated, paranoia-filled mental state—an "undesirable, disagreeable fruit" (*bù-kě-yì guǒ* / 不可意果). * **Correcting through Mundane Right View (*Shì-sú zhèng-jiàn*):** Realizing that cause and effect are real, even when complex. Recognizing that maintaining personal integrity, generosity (*shī-shě*), and clean livelihood creates internal peace and healthy conditions, regardless of short-term corporate noise.

Scenario 3: The "Life-Hacking" Productivity Obsession

* The Experience: You buy every self-help book, download tracking apps, and attempt to optimize your sleep, diet, and calendar down to the minute, believing that if you just get the right system, you will achieve total control over your life and mind. * Canonical Mapping: This mirrors the mistake of non-Buddhist ascetics claiming "Unhindered Omniscience" (*Cháng wú-ài zhī-jiàn* / 常無礙知見). The Buddha criticized these teachers because, despite claiming total mastery, they still fell into ditches and got lost. When your life-hacking system fails due to an unexpected illness or family emergency, your mental collapse is severe because it was built on the false view that absolute, uninterrupted conscious control is achievable. * Correcting through Wisdom: Accepting the Buddha’s insight that no mind knows or controls everything at once (*bù-cún-zài yī-shí zhī yī-qiè* / 不存在一時知一切). True stability comes not from total control, but from recognizing impermanence.

Scenario 4: Practicing Supramundane Right View in Personal Relationships

* The Experience: During a heated argument with your partner, instead of reflexively reacting, a pause occurs. You notice the sharp sensation of anger rising, the narrative of blame taking root, and the impulse to attack. * Canonical Mapping: This is Supramundane Right View (*Chū-shì-jiān zhèng-jiàn*) at work. You actively engage in *investigation and discernment* (*fēn-bié tuī-qiú* / 分別推求; *kāi-jué guān-chá* / 開覺觀察). You see that the suffering (*kǔ* / 苦) arises from grasping onto a demand (*jí* / 集), and that letting go of the demand brings immediate peace (*miè* / 滅). You are actively practicing "Gradual Reduction" (*Jiàn-sǔn* / 漸損) by stripping away self-importance.


当代人为什么需要它 (Why Contemporary People Need It)

1. The Algorithmic Echo-Chamber and "Divergent Views" (*Yì-jiàn*)

We live in an era where algorithms profit by amplifying our cognitive biases. The sūtras warn that when people hold "Divergent Views, Divergent Desires, and Divergent Intentions" (*Yì-jiàn, yì-yù, yì-yì* / 異見、異欲、異意), they become hopelessly bound in the "web of views" (*zhū-jiàn chán-fù* / 諸見纏縛) and are constantly driven by delusion (*cháng suí mó-yì* / 常隨魔意). Without an intentional framework to audit our underlying views, we do not think our thoughts—our algorithms think us. *Zhèng-jiàn* (Right View) offers contemporary humans a cognitive sanctuary, teaching us to inspect our foundational assumptions rather than blindly reacting to outrage.

2. AI, Neuroscience, and the Architecture of Perception

Modern neuroscience speaks of Predictive Processing—the discovery that the brain does not passively receive reality, but actively generates top-down "models" (views) that project predictions onto sensory data. If the model is flawed, perception is distorted. This offers a compelling parallel to the Buddhist insight that *Jiàn* conditions our entire felt experience.

Furthermore, as Artificial Intelligence models process vast quantities of information, they mimic a form of "omniscience." Yet, AI lacks liberation; it processes data without subjective wisdom (*xiá-huì* / 黠慧) or ethical discernment.

*Crucial Distinction:* While neuroscience maps neural correlates and predictive errors, and AI processes statistical patterns, neither offers a path to unconditioned liberation (*wú-lòu jiě-tuō* / 無漏解脫). Science analyzes the mechanisms of conditioned reality; Buddhist Right View uses direct observation to transcend conditioning altogether, guiding the mind toward the complete cessation of friction (*zhū-fǎ miè-jìn wú-yú*).


常见误读与澄清 (Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications)

Misunderstanding 1: "Having 'Right View' means being passive, having no opinions, or refusing to take a stand."

* Clarification: In early Buddhism, Right View is not a blank slate or passive indifference. The sūtras explicitly define two functional levels. First, Mundane Right View requires an active commitment to ethical causality, recognizing that actions have real consequences. Second, Supramundane Right View is described as a highly active, sharp, analytical wisdom (*fēn-bié qiú-jué* / 分別求覺; *qiǎo-biàn xiá-huì* / 巧便𭶑慧). It does not suppress thinking; it sharpens awareness to dissect suffering and dissolve self-deception.

Misunderstanding 2: "Right View is just a philosophical theory you agree with intellectually."

* Clarification: *Jiàn* is a seed (*zhǒng-zi* / 種子). An intellectual theory that remains in your head while your daily speech (*kǒu-yè* / 口業) and mental habits (*yì-yè* / 意業) remain reactive is not Right View—it is merely what the sūtras call "holding divergent opinions" (*yì-jiàn* / 異見). True Right View (*Zhèng-jiàn*) transforms the entire Eightfold Path; if a perspective does not actively sweeten your intentions, speech, and actions, it has not yet become realized Right View.

Misunderstanding 3: "Enlightenment means instantly achieving an all-knowing, all-seeing cosmic mind."

* Clarification: The Buddha explicitly rejected claims of simultaneous omniscience ("有一時知一切,一時見一切"), calling out non-Buddhist teachers who made such claims while tripping into ditches. Buddhist liberation is not about downloading infinite data about the universe. True Right View is "seeing things as they are" (*rú-shí zhī, rú-shí jiàn* / 如實知、如實見)—specifically, seeing how suffering arises, how it vanishes, and realizing the complete, residual-less peace when clinging stops (*zhū-fǎ miè-jìn wú-yú* / 諸法滅盡無餘).

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在阿含经典中,「见」(dṛṣṭi)是指对自我、世间及真理的见解、观点与知见。它既包含世俗对自我与世界的虚妄执着(如计有神、有众生等邪见或恶见),也包含引导众生走向善趣或彻底解脱的「正见」(或称「善见」)。见解不仅是认知,更是决定众生行为导向与最终业报归宿的关键力量。

二、主要阐述

#### 1. 世俗诸见与邪见的表现 在《中阿含经》中,世俗诸见主要表现为对实体自我的执着,即「计有神,计有众生,有人、有寿、有命、有世」。而在《杂阿含经》中,邪见(恶见)则表现为否定因果与解脱可能性的外道观点,例如「无因、无缘众生无智、无见」等。此外,外道师(如沙门蛮头、不兰迦叶、阿夷哆鸡舍剑婆利等)常自称拥有「无余知、无余见」或「常无碍知见」,宣称在行住坐卧、睡眠或醒觉时皆常有知见。佛陀对此进行了批判,指出这些外道在实际生活中仍会遭遇恶兽、跌入沟壑、迷路问道,证明其宣称存在过失与矛盾。佛陀澄清,不存在「有一时知一切,一时见一切」的沙门或梵志。

2. 正见的分类与内涵

《杂阿含经》将「正见」系统地分为世俗与出世间两个层次: - 世俗正见:表现为「世、俗,有漏、有取,转向善趣」(或「向于善趣」),其具体内涵是相信有施舍、有说法、有斋戒,乃至自知不受后有(即世间有阿罗汉)。 - 出世间正见:表现为「圣、出世间,无漏、不取,正尽苦,转向苦边」,这是圣弟子对苦、集、灭、道四圣谛进行思惟,与无漏思惟相应,并在法上进行「选择、分别推求(或分别求觉)、觉知黠慧(或巧便𭶑慧)、开觉观察」的智慧。

3. 灭除与舍离诸见的修行路径

为了灭除与舍离世俗之见,使其不再相续、不再受持,修行者必须如实知、如实见「诸法灭尽无余」。为达到此境界,修行者应当于圣法律中修学「渐损」。此「渐损」是一套系统的修行路径,包括:证入并成就第四禅;度一切色想,乃至成就「非有想非无想处」;证得「四息解脱」,离色得无色;以及舍离恶欲、害意、杀生、非梵行、疑惑、慢、增慢等种种不善之法。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同经典及译本中,关于「见」的术语和表述存在细微而重要的差异: - 邪见与正见的异称:在《杂阿含经》中,邪见常被对应地称为「恶见」,而正见则被称为「善见」。 - 出世间正见的智慧特征:在描述出世间正见的智慧运作时,不同译本或经文段落有不同的用词。例如,有的表述为「选择、分别推求、觉知黠慧、开觉观察」,有的则表述为「选择、分别求觉、巧便𭶑慧、开觉观察」。 - 世俗正见的趋向:对于世俗正见的果报趋向,经中有的表述为「转向善趣」,有的则表述为「向于善趣」。 - 独特音译与修辞:《杂阿含经》中使用了独特的音译词「萨罗」(意为坚实、精髓),并赞叹「萨罗无过见」,以此意指世间最殊胜的精髓莫过于正确的见解。

四、与相关概念的关系

- 与业报、行为的关系:「见」对个体的行为及果报具有决定性的导向作用。持「邪见(恶见)」者,其身业、口业、心思、欲望、誓愿与作为皆随顺其邪见,因而起邪志、邪语、邪业、邪命、邪方便、邪念、邪定,最终必然收获「不爱、不念、不可意」的苦果。经中以「苦果种子」为喻,说明种下苦种,其果实也全是苦的。相反,持「正见(善见)」者,其身口意业、愿望与作为皆随顺正见,能起正志、正语、正业、正命、正方便、正念、正定,最终收获「可爱、可念、可意」的善果,犹如种下甘蔗、稻、麦、蒲桃等「甜美种子」,其果实自然甜美。 - 与生死流转(十二因缘)的关系:在十二因缘的生成机制中,「见」与业、烦恼、有、爱、慢、无明等共同作用而生起「行」。若能断除烦恼、爱、见、无明,则「行」等流转因缘得以熄灭。 - 与解脱及障碍的关系:「异见」会成为理解佛法的障碍。若众生长夜抱持「异见、异忍、异乐、异欲、异意」,其见解、忍可、喜好、意欲及作意与圣教相异,便无法彻底理解佛陀所说的深妙义理。佛法之外的其余道途,皆被「诸见」所缠缚,常随魔意、不得自在;而善于以法调伏者,则能「不随于诸见」,随时觉悟。

五、代表性原文引用

- 《中阿含经》:「世中诸见,本所未生而生,已生而增广。大周那!此见何因何缘而生?计有神,计有众生,有人、有寿、有命、有世……若有如实知、如实见诸法灭尽无余者,如是此见得灭,如是得舍离。大周那!汝等当于圣法律中修渐损。」 - 《中阿含经》:「优陀夷!汝长夜异见、异忍、异乐、异欲、异意,汝何能知我为弟子说法,令得无漏、心解脱、慧解脱?」 - 《杂阿含经》:「何等为正见?谓正见有二种。有正见,是世、俗,有漏、有取,转向善趣;有正见,是圣、出世间,无漏、不取,正尽苦,转向苦边。」 - 《杂阿含经》:「若人有邪见,作如是说,其人身业、口业、意业,及彼所愿、所欲、所建立、所作,悉皆随顺邪见。彼一切法,皆得不爱、不念、不可意果。所以者何?以其恶见。譬如苦种,植之于地,随其地界、水界、火界、风界,所得之味,悉皆是苦。所以者何?以其种子苦故。」

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》論「見」一詞,主要從兩個層面展開:一為世俗之執見,一為究竟之知見。

關於世俗執見,經中列舉「世中諸見」,具體表現為「計有神,計有眾生,有人、有壽、有命、有世」等種種計著。對於此等諸見如何滅盡,經中教導「漸損」之法,包括離欲得第四禪、超越色想至非有想非無想處、修行四息解脫,以及對種種煩惱(惡欲、念欲、害意瞋、殺生、增伺、瞋結、慢、增慢等)逐一調伏,令其不續不受。此處「見」義側重於對事理的執著性認知,即以特定見解為實的錯計。

關於知見層面,經中多次出現「一切知、一切見」、「無餘知、無餘見」、「一時知一切,一時見一切」等表述。其中沙門蠻頭自稱有「無礙知見」,能在行住坐臥中常無障礙地觀照一切。然而異學箭毛則指出,諸如不蘭迦葉、阿夷哆雞舍劍婆利等人雖自稱「一切知、一切見」,實際面對策慮質問卻不能作答,由此質疑其實有薩云然之說。波斯匿王亦問及此類主張,世尊澄清自己從未說過「若有餘沙門、梵志一切知、一切見者」,但確曾說過「若有餘沙門、梵志一時知一切,一時見一切」是不存在的(「本無,當不有,今現亦無」)。此處的「見」側重於究竟的、如實的觀照能力,與前文「執見」之義形成對照。

特別值得留意的是,《中阿含經》此處以「一切知、一切見」一語標幟外道所自稱的最高知見境界,並透過具體問難(箭毛問事)以及世尊親口辨析(「一時知一切」之否定)來破斥此類主張。經中術語形式可歸納為:以「諸見」、「計有……(神、眾生、人、壽、命、世)」表世俗執見,以「知見」、「一切知、一切見」、「一時見一切」表究竟觀照之見,層次分明。此外,經末記載異學梵志聞阿難說法而「歡喜奉行」,雖未直接展開「見」之義理,卻顯示經中將「見」置於聞法、信受、奉行的整體脈絡中加以考察。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》對於「見」的論述散見於多處,涵蓋正、邪兩面,並將「見」列為緣起流轉的一環。

首先,經中以詩頌形式揭示「見」的危險與解脫之道:「以法善調伏,不隨於諸見,雖復著睡眠,則能隨時悟」,意謂若能以正法調伏自心,便不隨順種種邪見,縱然暫時沉溺,也能隨時覺悟。此處「諸見」明確指向使人執著的外道種種見解,強調「不隨」乃趣向覺悟之要。

其次,經文列舉外道邪見的典型形態:「有沙門、婆羅門作如是見、如是說:『無因、無緣眾生無智、無見,無因、無緣眾生智、見』」,顯示當時外道執著於「無因無緣」之見,將眾生之愚與智皆歸於無因而論,這正是本經所破斥的對象。經中以「作如是見、如是說」的句式,揭示見與說相互依存的關係。

第三,經中將「見」正式列入緣起法的因緣序列:「如是業,煩惱、有、愛、見、慢、無明而生行;若有業而無煩惱、愛、見、無明者,行則滅」,說明「見」與煩惱、愛、慢、無明並列,為生起「行」的助緣之一;若無此等染污之見等因緣和合,行即息滅。這是本經以緣起框架處理「見」的獨特表述——將「見」視為推動輪迴流轉的一支因緣,而非單獨的觀念錯誤。

第四,經中以偈頌提示「見」的過患:「愛無過於己,財無過於穀,光明無過慧,薩羅無過見」,意謂貪愛莫過於自我,財物莫過於稻穀,光明(智慧照耀)莫過於慧,而「薩羅」(意為覆蓋、遮蔽)莫過於「見」。此處以「薩羅」一詞獨特比喻「見」具有遮蔽真實之作用,暗示邪見能覆蓋慧光,此用語為本經論「見」之別具特色的術語形式。

第五,經中以長偈描繪外道被見纏縛的困境,以及由佛陀正法得解脫的過程:「此法外諸道,諸見所纏縛,縛於諸見已,常隨魔自在」,明示外道諸見乃魔所使,被見束縛者常受魔自在支配;唯有稟佛大師之教、得清淨解脫者,方能「伏諸魔怨,不為彼所伏」,「離一切愛喜,捨一切闇冥,寂滅以作證,安住諸漏盡」。

綜合而言,《雜阿含經》對「見」的論述具有以下特色:一、以「見」與「諸見」並用,泛指各種見解;二、明確將「見」與愛、慢、無明並列,視為緣起流轉的因緣;三、以「薩羅」一詞形容「見」的遮蔽性,強調邪見能覆慧光,此為獨特術語;四、反覆指出「不隨諸見」乃趣向覺悟的關鍵。這些表述反映了早期佛教以緣起正觀破斥邪見的基本立場。

大智度論T1509 · 釋經論部

《大智度論》對「見」(對事理所持的見解、觀點)的論述極為詳盡,可從以下幾方面把握:

一、見的性質與作用:見能為種種結使作因,與眾生種種苦密切相關;一切眾生多墮常、斷二見之中。論中強調菩薩應自斷此二見,亦能除一切眾生二見,令處中道,顯示見在中道實踐中的關鍵地位。

二、見的分類體系:論中列舉多層次分類。二種見有常見、斷見;又有有見、無見之別。三種見為一切法忍、一切法不忍、一切法亦忍亦不忍。四種見就世間常、無常、亦常亦無常、亦非常亦非無常而立,此模式亦適用於我及世間有邊無邊、死後去來等十四難類問題。五種見即五見:身見、邊見、邪見、見取、戒取。乃至六十二見,皆須斷除。此經使用「五見」、「六十二見」、「常見」、「斷見」等術語形式。

三、見與其他煩惱的關係:見屬內著煩惱,與婬、瞋等外著煩惱相對,無明則內外共。結有二種——屬愛與屬見;五見、疑、慢等屬內著。纏者,心為煩惱結繞;見、纏、煩惱三者並列,構成菩薩所斷之對象。

四、知與見的差別:論中明確區分二者。有知非見者,盡智、無生智,除世間正見及五見外,餘慧皆名知;見非知者,五見、世間正見、見諦道中八忍;亦知亦見者,其餘無漏慧;離見知之餘法則非知非見。又以定心名為見,定與未定通名為知。

五、見的斷捨與對治:佛法「棄捨一切愛、一切見,一切吾我憍慢悉斷不著」,透過般若波羅蜜的修學,達到對一切法無所取著。菩薩以種種方便自斷諸見,亦以巧說諸法空的方式斷他人諸見、纏、煩惱。如論中所載三人由夢中事悟入諸法皆空之理,詣颺陀婆羅菩薩請問,聞巧說法即得阿鞞跋致,即為斷見之例。

六、見的生起因緣:種種見由種種因緣生,種種智門觀,種種師邊聞。

Related