Dharma · AI Companion

擇法

dharmapravicaya

以智慧辨别善恶与真伪诸法。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

择法觉支初以善恶真伪为简择对象(第一重);般若系正面升为抉择诸法实相(第二重)。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In the Buddhist path to liberation, 擇法 (dharma-pravicaya, "discrimination of phenomena"—Pali *dharma-pravicaya*, Sanskrit *dharma-pravicaya*) is the second factor among the seven factors of awakening (七覺支, sapta bodhyaṅga, also called 七覺分), which are themselves part of the thirty-seven aids to awakening (三十七道品, saptatriṃśad bodhipakṣyā dharma). In brief, 擇法 is the sharp discrimination, selection, and decisive discernment—through wisdom—of all phenomena (諸法, sarvadharma) within and without body and mind.

Many people are prone to narrowing 擇法 down to the mundane sense of "making choices" or "picking and choosing." But the classical scriptures and treatises define the content and boundaries of 擇法 very strictly:

1. Core function: discerning the opposites of dharma and vinaya 擇法 is not merely choosing a practice; it is a precise discernment of the nature of the phenomenal world and of the causality of actions. In the *Saṃyukta-āgama* (雜阿含經), what 擇法 distinguishes are highly oppositional categories: * Right and wrong, dharma and non-dharma: e.g., discerning that "wrong view is non-dharma; right view is dharma"; * Vinaya and non-vinaya: e.g., discerning that "killing is non-vinaya; not killing is right vinaya"; * Wholesome and unwholesome, black and white, inferior and superior, blameworthy and blameless: at the arising of every thought, every word, every action, one can see through to whether the underlying psychological motivation is defiled (black phenomena, inferior phenomena, blameworthy phenomena) or pure (white phenomena, superior phenomena, blameless phenomena).

2. Internal and external conditions: right thought and good spiritual friends The awakening factor of 擇法 does not arise out of nowhere; its arising and growth depend on two decisive conditions: * Internal condition (正思惟, "right thought"): if the practitioner engages in "wrong thought" (不正思惟)—falling into irrational mental attention or scattered fantasies—the unarisen awakening factor of 擇法 will not arise, and what has already arisen will decline. Conversely, maintaining "right thought" (attention in accordance with reality, observation consistent with the true nature of things) allows the wisdom of 擇法 to be reborn and to grow. * External condition (善知識, kalyāṇamitra, "good spiritual friend"): through associating with "evil companions and evil associates" (惡知識、惡伴黨), the awakening factor of 擇法 will decline; while associating with "good spiritual friends, good companions, and good followers" (善知識、善伴黨、善隨從) directly promotes the sprouting and consolidation of the awakening factor of 擇法.

3. Ultimate orientation: grounded in detachment, grounded in desirelessness, grounded in cessation, tending toward relinquishment This is the most fundamental difference between 擇法 and mundane "logical analysis" or "critical thinking." Mundane analysis tends toward more clinging and stronger desire the more one analyzes; the awakening factor of 擇法 in cultivation, by contrast, must be strictly "grounded in detachment, grounded in desirelessness, grounded in cessation, tending toward relinquishment" (依遠離、依無欲、依滅、向於舍). Its purpose is not to build a stubborn "fortress of views," but to penetrate phenomena, release clinging, and point toward the final liberation of the mind (涅槃, nirvāṇa).

4. Position within the seven factors of awakening and its state of practice In the progressive relationship of the seven factors of awakening, the mindfulness factor (念覺支, sati-sambojjhaṅga, "mindfulness") first establishes awareness of present body-and-mind phenomena; immediately thereafter, the awakening factor of 擇法 (擇法覺支) observes and discriminates these phenomena with wisdom, thereby giving rise to the energy factor of awakening (精進覺支, virya-sambojjhaṅga). The scriptures emphasize that the practice of 擇法 is not a blind, forceful "straining of thought." The Venerables Upama (優波摩), Adhimutta (阿提目多), and Aniruddha (阿那律) all point out that when cultivating the awakening factors such as 擇法, if one skillfully applies thought and taming—so that the "mind is well liberated, rightly destroying sleep, taming restlessness and remorse" (心善解脫、正害睡眠、調伏掉悔)—body and mind can reach a state where "the body is calmed and stilled, not agitated, the mind unified in proper reception" (身猗息不動亂、一心正受), thereby experiencing "dwelling in ease" (樂住) and stillness without needing excessive exertion.


A Walk-Through in Daily Life

To keep 擇法 from becoming an abstract doctrine, we can bring this concept into scenes utterly familiar to contemporary people—scrolling through phone feeds and workplace overtime—and see what difference there is between a mind without 擇法 wisdom and a mind in which the awakening factor of 擇法 has been activated.

Scenario One: Late-Night Phone Scrolling and Algorithmic Recommendations

* Where people most easily mis-map the concept: Many people think that choosing which blogger to follow, which product to buy, or which article to read on their phone is 擇法. This is utterly wrong. Such picking is merely a mundane desire-driven choice governed by greed, aversion, and delusion—not only is it not 擇法, it is often precisely "wrong thought."

* The actual walk-through of 擇法 wisdom: 1. Mindful awareness (the mindfulness factor): At midnight, you lie in bed scrolling through short videos. A push notification about "all your peers are earning millions a year" triggers your anxiety, and your heart suddenly tightens. 2. Wisdom discrimination (the arising of the 擇法 awakening factor): At this moment, the awakening factor of 擇法 activates. Like a sharp observer, it discriminates the present psychological phenomena: * Discerning wholesome and unwholesome, black and white: "The thoughts arising in me now are envy and unease—this is 'black phenomena, inferior phenomena, blameworthy phenomena' (unwholesome dharmas that produce affliction); the peace that was originally in my mind is 'white phenomena, superior phenomena.'" * Discerning causality and right thought: "The algorithmic feed exploits the fear in human nature (wrong thought). If I keep scrolling along with it, unarisen afflictions will arise, and the peace I had will decline." 3. Resorting to the orientation (grounded in detachment, tending toward relinquishment): 擇法 wisdom clearly indicates the direction—this moment's grasping at phone information is non-dharma, a cause of suffering; one should be "grounded in detachment, grounded in desirelessness, tending toward relinquishment." Accordingly, the hand naturally puts down the phone, the light goes off, and one sleeps; the mind quickly tames restlessness and remorse and dwells joyfully in stillness.

Scenario Two: Workplace Rat Race and Verbal Conflict

* Where people most easily mis-map the concept: In the workplace, shrewdly calculating benefits, picking out flaws in a colleague's proposal, and turning crises into advantages—people take this to be 擇法. In fact, this is merely mundane calculation (wrong thought); what it increases is competitiveness and self-clinging.

* The actual walk-through of 擇法 wisdom: 1. Discerning right and wrong, vinaya and non-vinaya: In a meeting, a colleague publicly and snidely puts you down. A surge of anger (hatred) flares up instantly, and you want to fire back hard. At this moment the awakening factor of 擇法 is present: killing and harsh speech are non-vinaya; not using harsh speech is right vinaya. If you choose to say something hurtful, that is "blameworthy phenomena"; if you can maintain mindfulness and respond with a pure mind, that is "blameless phenomena." 2. Discerning companions and environment: The awakening factor of 擇法 examines the current circle and colleagues, realizing that if one day after day mingles with those who love to gossip and stir up trouble (evil companions, evil associates), the unarisen wisdom of 擇法 within will vanish; conversely, one should spend more time with people of bright character and solid practicality (good spiritual friends). 3. Mind well liberated and dwelling in ease: Through 擇法, you see through the delusion behind the other's harsh words; your mind is no longer kidnapped by the other's emotions (destroying sleep, taming restlessness and remorse). You need not exhaust yourself in "slanging matches" or anxious rumination; body and mind immediately feel a lightness and composure—this is the contemporary expression of "dwelling in ease with proper reception" (樂住正受).


Why Contemporary People Need It

In a contemporary society of information explosion and algorithmic hunting, people today have fallen into an unprecedented "perceptual overload" and "mental attrition." We appear to make thousands of choices every day (which takeout to order, what show to watch, which stocks to buy), but in reality, the vast majority of these choices are led by the nose by emotion, collective anxiety, and commercial algorithms.

1. Breaking the "algorithmic enslavement" and reclaiming the initiative of volitional attention Modern technology (such as AI recommendations and information feeds) essentially sustains user retention by capturing humanity's "wrong thought" (greed, sensation-seeking, anger, anxiety). Without the awakening factor of 擇法, the human brain becomes an unscrupulous testing ground for algorithms. 擇法 wisdom gives contemporary people a "scalpel," enabling us to dissect, within a second, the nature of the present mind-moment: Is this black phenomena or white phenomena? Is this a wrong view that triggers affliction, or a right view that brings liberation? With 擇法, we can reclaim control over our own attention and our lives.

2. Comparison with, and transcendence of, contemporary cognitive psychology Contemporary cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) also emphasize identifying "automatic thoughts" and "cognitive distortions" in the mind. This resonates deeply with the way the awakening factor of 擇法 uses "right thought" to discern "wrong views from right views." * The limitation of science: Psychology typically stops at "improving mood" or "adapting to society"; its goal is often to help people function better within the mundane system. * The transcendence of Buddhism: The ultimate goal of the awakening factor of 擇法 is not merely psychological health, but being "grounded in detachment, grounded in desirelessness, grounded in cessation, tending toward relinquishment"—it points directly to the final liberation of a mind without any hindrance.

3. From "excessive exertion" to "natural dwelling in ease" Contemporary people often overexert themselves in practice or psychological adjustment, falling into another kind of anxiety—"Did I have enough mindfulness today?" "Why did anger arise in me again?" The dialogues of the venerables in the classics offer contemporary people a soothing prescription: 擇法 is not forceful suppression, but "skillful knowing and thinking" (善知思惟). When you can precisely discern your mind-moments, so that the mind is well liberated and restlessness and remorse are tamed, you no longer need "excessive exertion through expedient means" (過度勤苦方便); naturally you can "give rise to dwelling in ease" (生樂住), obtaining an unhurried equanimity and stillness amid the complexity of life.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

* Misreading One: 擇法 is mundane "pickiness" or "logical reasoning" * Clarification: Mundane logical reasoning is centered on self-clinging (我執, ātma-grāha); the more one reasons, the more stubborn one's views become and the more easily disputes arise (black phenomena, inferior phenomena). The awakening factor of 擇法, by contrast, is a wisdom grounded in "right thought" and oriented toward "detachment, desirelessness, cessation, and relinquishment." Any thinking that makes you more anxious the more you analyze, and more arrogant the more you criticize, belongs to "wrong thought"—it is by no means the awakening factor of 擇法.

* Misreading Two: One can arouse the awakening factor of 擇法 through solitary brooding alone * Clarification: The classics clearly state that the arising of 擇法 requires not only the internal "right thought" but also the external "good spiritual friends, good companions, and good followers." If a person remains long in circles full of utilitarianism, restlessness, and wrong views (evil companions), one's own awakening factor of 擇法 easily declines. Acknowledging the importance of an external pure environment and the guidance of good friends is a very realistic and crucial part of practice.

* Misreading Three: 擇法 is simply dividing the world into "good and bad," thereby producing a judgmental mind * Clarification: Although 擇法 discriminates between "good and evil, black and white, inferior and superior," its purpose is not to condemn the external world or punish oneself, but to "know the danger and depart" (知患而離). The ultimate orientation of 擇法 is "tending toward relinquishment" (向於舍)—inner equanimity without clinging. It is a liberating wisdom that arises after clearly seeing the true nature of phenomena, free from attachment—not a lofty sense of moral judgment.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

定义与核心要义 择法(dharma-pravicaya),又称择法觉支或择法觉分,是佛教修行核心“七觉支”(或“七觉分”)之一。其核心要义在于通过智慧对诸法进行甄别、选择与抉择。在修行过程中,择法不仅是迈向觉悟的关键环节,也是修行者在面对各种法与律时,区分正邪、善恶、黑白、卑胜、有罪无罪的决定性智慧。通过正思惟与亲近善知识,修行者能够生起并增广择法觉支,从而依止远离、无欲、灭、向于舍,最终达到心善解脱、乐住正受的修行境界。 主要阐述 在《雜阿含經》中,择法作为七觉支之一,其修持、生起因缘及具体实践得到了详尽的阐述。 首先,关于择法觉支的生起与退失,经中从内因与外因两个维度进行了深入探讨: 其一,内在因缘在于修行者的作意方式,即“思惟”的性质。经中指出,若比丘“不正思惟”,则未起的择法觉支便不会升起,而已起者亦会随之退失;相反,若能保持“正思惟”,则能令未起的择法觉支顺利升起,已起者亦能重生并得以增广。这表明修行者内在的作意方向是择法智慧能否现前并保持的关键。 其二,外在因缘在于修行者所处的伴侣与导师环境,即“知识”的善恶。若修行者亲近“恶知识、恶伴党”,未生的择法觉分便无法升起,已生者亦会退失;若能亲近“善知识、善伴党、善随从”,则能令未生的择法觉分升起,已生者重生增广。这强调了外部清净环境与良师益友对择法修持的决定性辅助作用。 其次,经中探讨了修习择法觉分的具体方便与修行体验: 在方便修习与乐住方面,尊者优波摩与尊者阿提目多指出,修习择法等七觉分时,修行者需要善于思惟自己的心念,观察心是否善解脱、是否害睡眠、是否调伏掉悔。若能达到“心善解脱,正害睡眠,调伏掉悔”的状态,则不需过度勤苦方便,即可获得平等,乐住正受。尊者阿那律也对此进行了强调,认为在方便修习择法等七觉分时,若能善知思惟,使心善解脱、善害睡眠、善调伏掉悔,并精勤方便、心不懈怠、身猗息不动乱、系心令住、一心正受,便能“生乐住”。这表明择法的修习并非盲目用力,而是伴随着对心境的精细调控与寂静乐住的体验。 在依止方向上,修习择法觉分有着明确的导向。经中指出,修习择法觉分时,必须“依远离、依无欲、依灭、向于舍”。这一导向确保了择法修行不会走向世俗的执着,而是直接指向涅槃与解脱。 此外,择法觉分还可以与具体的禅修方法相结合。例如,比丘在修习不净观时,应当与择法觉分等协同修习,同样要“依远离、依无欲、依灭、向于舍”,如此多修习能得大果大福利。这展示了择法作为一种普遍的智慧观察,能够渗透并指导其他的具体修行法门。 不同部类与译本的表述差异 在《雜阿含經》中,对于“择法”这一概念,存在着不同的术语表述形式。 经文在论述这一觉支时,交替使用了“择法觉支”与“择法觉分”这两种术语形式。例如,在阐述因正思惟或不正思惟而导致其升起或退失时,经文使用的是“择法觉支”;而在阐述因亲近善知识或恶知识而导致其升起或退失,以及尊者们讨论方便修习时,经文则多使用“择法觉分”。此外,在偈颂的表述中,择法亦被列为“七觉分”之一,并被称为微妙之善说。这些不同的用词反映了在经典结集或翻译过程中,对于同一概念在不同语境下的多样化呈现。 与相关概念的关系 择法作为七觉支之一,与其他修行概念有着密切的联系: 第一,与“七觉支/七觉分”的关系。择法是七觉支(或七觉分)的核心组成部分。在偈颂中,择法与其余觉支共同构成了走向觉悟的完整通路,被赞叹为微妙之善说。 第二,与“正思惟”与“善知识”的关系。正思惟是择法觉支生起的内在因缘,善知识则是其生起的外在因缘。没有正思惟与善知识的引导,择法便无法生起或保持。 第三,与“不净观”的关系。择法觉分可以与不净观协同修习。在修习不净观时,引入择法觉分,并同样“依远离、依无欲、依灭、向于舍”,能够使修行获得极大的果报与福利。 第四,与“法”与“律”的甄别关系。虽然“择法”常在七觉支的框架下讨论,本义却是对“法”与“律”的甄别和选择。经中广泛论述了需要被择法智慧所甄别的对立概念,如“邪见非法、正见是法”,“杀生非律、不杀正律”,以及“不善法与善法”、“黑法与白法”、“卑法与胜法”、“有罪法与无罪法”等。择法正是对这些正邪、善恶进行明辨并选择正法、正律的智慧过程。 代表性原文引用 1. 关于正思惟与择法觉支的生起:“不正思惟,未起择法觉支令不起,已起择法觉支令退;……正思惟,未起择法觉支令起,已起择法觉支重起,令增广。” 2. 关于善恶知识与择法觉分:“恶知识、恶伴党、恶随从,未生择法觉分令不生,已生择法觉分令退失;……善知识、善伴党、善随从,未生择法觉分令生,已生择法觉分重起,令增广。” 3. 尊者优波摩与阿提目多关于方便修习的论述:“若比丘于择法等七觉分方便修习,善知思惟,心善解脱,正害睡眠,调伏掉悔。若能如是,则不须过度勤苦方便,即可获得平等,乐住正受。” 4. 尊者阿那律关于乐住的论述:“方便修习择法等七觉分时,若能善知思惟,使心善解脱、善害睡眠、善调伏掉悔,并精勤方便、心不懈怠、身猗息不动乱、系心令住、一心正受,便能‘生乐住’。” 5. 关于修习的依止方向:“修习择法觉分,依远离、依无欲、依灭、向于舍。” 6. 关于不净观与择法觉分的协同:“比丘在修习不净观时,应与择法觉分等协同修习,同样要‘依远离、依无欲、依灭、向于舍’,如此多修习能得大果大福利。” 7. 关于法与非法的甄别:“邪见非法、正见是法……不善法与善法、黑法与白法、卑法与胜法、有罪法与无罪法。” 8. 关于律与非律的甄别:“杀生非律、不杀正律。”

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「擇法」,主要將其列為七覺支(七覺分)之一,與念覺支、精進、猗、喜、定、捨覺支並舉,反覆說明其生起、增長、退失的因緣與具體修習方法。

一、擇法作為七覺支之一定位

經中多次以「念覺支乃至擇法、精進、喜、猗、定、捨覺支」之並列格式,將擇法與其餘六支共同列出,視為一完整修行門類中不可分割的一支。偈頌中亦載:「念、擇法、精進、喜、猗、定、捨覺,此則七覺分,微妙之善說」,以詩頌確認擇法於七覺分中的次第。在本經現存諸譯文中,擇法鮮少獨立討論,皆附麗於七覺支整體的脈絡中陳述。

二、擇法生起與退失的因緣

經以對比方式說明擇法的成敗。正思惟者能使「未起擇法覺支則起,已起者重生令增廣」;不正思惟者則「未起擇法覺支不起,已起……則退」。同樣,惡知識、惡伴黨能使「未生擇法覺分令不生,已生者令退」;善知識、善伴黨、善隨從者則能使「未生擇法覺分令生,已生者重生令增廣」。此處須注意:本經對同一概念兼用「覺支」與「覺分」二種譯名,於不同段落交替出現,屬本經譯語上的特色。

三、擇法修習的具體方便

尊者優波摩以對答方式說明比丘如何「善知方便修七覺分」,明列念覺分乃至擇法、精進、喜、猗、定、捨覺分皆以「思惟——精進方便——得平等」之相同結構修習。尊者阿那律亦以相同格式開示「方便修七覺分時生樂住」,強調念覺分乃至擇法、精進、喜、猗、定、捨覺分皆須「精勤方便,心不懈怠,繫心令住,不起亂念,一心正受」。二人所說皆顯示擇法之修習與餘六支共用同一方便,即以思惟、精進、攝心、正受為其運作方式。

四、擇法修習之所依

世尊直接教示:「若比丘修念覺分,依遠離、依無欲、依滅、向於捨。如是修擇法、精進、喜、猗、定、捨覺分,依遠離、依無欲、依滅、向於捨」,明定擇法等七支皆依此四依而修。此修法亦運用於不淨觀中:「修擇法、精進、喜、猗、定、捨覺分,依遠離、依無欲、依滅、向於捨」,顯示擇法的所依在多種行法中皆可共通運作,呈現出本經以「依遠離、依無欲、依滅、向於捨」為七覺支共通修法的固定表述。

綜觀本經,擇法雖作為七覺支之一而屢與餘支合說,然經文每次列舉時皆將其完整納入,並具體指出其生起因緣(正思惟、善知識、善伴黨)、修習方便(思惟、精進、正受)以及所依(遠離、無欲、滅、捨),使此一支並非空懸之名,而是有明確因緣與方法可循的修行項目。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》對「擇法」的論述,主要從「慧即是擇法」的等同性出發,並由此說明「阿毘達磨」(對法)一名得以施設的因緣。

一、擇法即慧——核心表述

論中明確指出「慧謂擇法」,將「擇法」直接等同於「慧」。此處的「慧」涵蓋有漏與無漏二類:就勝義阿毘達磨而言,淨(無漏)慧及其眷屬(隨行)總攝為無漏五蘊,即為對法;就世俗阿毘達磨而言,則攝有漏修慧、由思惟與聞法所生之慧、生得慧,以及與之相應的隨行。無論勝義、世俗,慧的本質即是對諸法之簡擇,故稱「擇法」。

二、離擇法無勝方便——對法的施設因緣

論中以頌及長行反覆強調:「若離擇法定無餘,能滅諸惑勝方便」,「若離擇法,無勝方便能滅諸惑」。意謂除了擇法之外,更無其他殊勝方便能滅除諸惑。由諸惑令世間眾生漂轉於生死大海,故佛陀傳說對法,正是為了使世間得成於擇法。可見「對法」之施設,其根本目的即在於成就眾生之擇法慧。

三、擇法的具體作用——如理簡擇法相

論中進一步指出:「離說對法,弟子不能於諸法相如理簡擇」。可知擇法的作用,即是於諸法之相,能如理(契合真理)地加以簡別揀擇。換言之,若無對法的教說,弟子便無法正確辨別諸法之自相、善惡與真偽。

四、「法」字的兩種所指

論中釋「法」字云:「能持自相故名為法」,即凡能保持其自體之相者皆名為法。復次,法有二義:若就勝義(究竟真實義)而言,法唯是涅槃;若就法相(諸法之事相)而言,法則通於四聖諦。對法之「對」,則是「能對向或能對觀」之義,即以此智慧趣向或觀照上述諸法。

五、本論術語形式

本論以「擇法」一詞為主,用以表示「以智慧辨別善惡與真偽諸法」之義。與之相關的異名尚有「慧」、「淨慧」、「對法」、「阿毘達磨」、「簡擇」等。其中「擇法」與「簡擇」義近,前者作為慧的自性之名,後者作為慧之功用的描述。論中亦以「對法藏」總稱此論,顯示本論自身即是成就擇法之阿毘達磨藏。

綜合而言,《阿毘達磨俱舍論》以「慧即是擇法」為核心判攝,主張離擇法則無方便能滅諸惑,佛說對法的本懷即在令眾生得擇法、於諸法相能如理簡擇,而本論自身即為對法之藏。

瑜伽師地論T1579 · 瑜伽部

《瑜伽師地論》論「擇法」,並非僅用一詞,而是以「擇法」「思擇」「簡擇」「最極簡擇」「極簡擇法」「黠了」「通達」等多個術語交織呈現其義涵。

首先,本論將擇法置於「四依」的框架中加以界定:一、法是依,非補特伽羅;二、義是依,非文;三、了義經是依,非不了義;四、智是依,非識。論中明示非唯由現威儀即可證正智,須「與彼論分別決擇」方可,並須「於義思惟、籌量、審觀察」,非但聞即為究竟。

其次,本論廣說「思擇」所應觀察之內容:自有色無色、有見無見、有漏無漏、有為無為,乃至四緣、四依、四無量、四念住等無量法門,皆「應當思擇」。又定義「思擇所知」為「善思擇所觀察義」,所觀察義為「於有法了知有相,於非有法了知無相」,有法更分自相、共相、假相、因相、果相五種。思擇諸法復分「思擇素呾纜義」與「思擇伽他義」二種。

再者,「多諸思擇」被定義為「勝善慧」,由此慧於晝夜分如實了知善、不善法之增長與衰退,並以此為依止,驅擯不善、勤修善法。

在菩薩行方面,論以「淨信為先、擇法為先」描述菩薩增上意樂,擇法為菩薩勝解印決定之先導。另有「簡擇法、極簡擇、遍尋求、遍伺察」等名相並列問答。

最值得留意者,本論對擇法內部層次有極細密之區分。以「已得無漏真作意故,緣聖諦境,一切無漏作意相應」界定擇法總相,並進而分三階:「簡擇」為總取一切苦法種類為苦聖諦;「最極簡擇」為各別分別取諸苦(生苦、老苦等);「極簡擇法」為依此處所簡擇契經等法。又以「審定解了」「審定等解了」「審定近解了」分別對應,並標明「前是尋求道,今是決定道」之深淺。此外尚有「黠了」為了知自相、分別體;「通達」為通達所知事;「解了」為於所知事作意發悟;「等解了」為方便尋求;「近解了」為求已決定。

末後,論以「念為所依,擇法能依」明二者相依之關係。

綜觀本論,擇法貫通聞思修證、聲聞與菩薩道:上承淨信與勝善慧,旁接四依簡別,下開三階差別與五相觀察,乃以智慧辨別善惡真偽之總樞紐。

Related