Dharma · AI Companion

外空

bahirdhā-śūnyatā

观外在诸法无自性AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span II · emptiness ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

十八空之一,般若以观外法无自性为遣执方便(2),智论终归毕竟空、离言不可得(4)

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

Here is an in-depth, accessible interpretation of External Emptiness (*Bahirdhā-śūnyatā* / 外空), written for the contemporary reader.


Deconstructing the Illusion of the "External World": Understanding External Emptiness (*Bahirdhā-śūnyatā*)

One-Sentence Definition

**External Emptiness (*Bahirdhā-śūnyatā*)** refers to the profound realization that the external objective phenomena we perceive—forms, sounds, odors, tastes, tactile objects, and mental objects (*rūpa, śabda, gandha, rasa, spraṣṭavya, dharma*)—are fundamentally void of inherent, self-sufficient existence (*svabhāva*) and cannot be grasped or possessed at their core.


What Is This Concept Talking About?

In our daily lives, we operate under a default assumption: *I* am inside this skull looking out, and *there* is a very real, solid, independent world existing "out there." This external world seems to exist whether I am looking at it or not—a rigid stage filled with objects, people, noises, and natural laws.

In Buddhist psychology and epistemology, this outward reality is categorized as the Six External Sense Objects (*bahirdhā-āyatana* / 外六入, 外六處): 1. Forms/Colors (*rūpa* / 色): Visible matter, shapes, light, and physical structures. 2. Sounds (*śabda* / 聲): Acoustic vibrations, voices, noise, and music. 3. Odors (*gandha* / 香): Fragrances, scents, and smells. 4. Tastes (*rasa* / 味): Flavors experienced through taste. 5. Tactile Objects (*spraṣṭavya* / 觸): Temperature, texture, hardness, and pressure. 6. Mental Objects (*dharma* / 法): Concepts, ideas, memory traces, and phenomena perceived by the mental consciousness.

When Mahāyāna Prajñāpāramitā literature introduces **External Emptiness (*bahirdhā-śūnyatā*), it does not mean that external things are physically nonexistent or that hitting a brick wall won't hurt. Rather, it dismantles our psychological projection of an "inherently real, permanently fixed, independent external realm"** [13033, 17955].

The classical canonical sutras define External Emptiness along specific, rigorous analytical dimensions:

1. Neither Eternal nor Extinguished, Nature as It Is (*非常非滅, 性自爾*)

As stated in the *Maha Prajnaparamita Sutra* (*T0223*): *"External phenomena are form, sound, odor, taste, touch, and mental objects. Form is empty of form, because it is neither eternal nor extinguished. Why? Its nature is naturally so (*性自爾*). The same applies to sound through mental objects."* [13033] * **Not Eternal (*非常*)**: External objects do not possess a permanent, unchanging core. They are constant processes of transformation. * **Not Extinguished (*非滅*)**: Emptiness is not annihilation. External forms do not disappear into nothingness; rather, they lack a solid starting or ending substance to begin with [13033]. * **Nature as It Is (*性自爾*)**: The emptiness of the external world is not a state you force upon objects through mental willpower; it is their inherent, intrinsic mode of being [13033].

2. Not Accumulated, Indestructible, Unclaspable (*非積聚、不可壞、不可取*)

The *Mahāsaṁnipāta Sūtra* (*T0397*) provides three precise descriptions of external objects [15764, 15765]: * **Not an Ultimate Aggregation (*非積聚*)**: An object (like a car or a mountain) appears as a single, unified entity, but under deep observation, it is merely a temporary configuration of causes and conditions without an ultimate "core entity." * **Indestructible (*不可壞*)**: Counterintuitively, because external things have no inherent, independent substance to begin with, there is no real, underlying "essence" that can be destroyed. What changes is merely form and relation. * **Unclaspable / Unattainable (*不可取*)**: Because external objects lack fixed inherent reality, no mind can truly "hold onto," possess, or freeze an external object or moment [15764].

3. Outer Elements and Outer Space (*外風界, 外虛空界*)

The *Maha Ratnakuta Sutra* (*T0310*) expands External Emptiness to macro-cosmic scale: * **External Wind/Motion (*身外風界*)**: The movement of air, weather, and physical kinetics outside our bodies. The sutra notes that when atmospheric winds rise or abate, they "come from nowhere and go nowhere" (*無所從來, 無所去*) [17946]. Their birth and cessation are empty; their nature is inherently free [17946]. * **External Space (*外虛空界*)**: Spatial distance and emptiness itself are not "substances." Space is described as "motionless, without change, empty, yet not an existing entity (*非是有法*)" [17947]. * **Objects as Dreams (*境界如夢*)**: Just as objects inside a night dream appear vividly real while sleeping but possess no physical reality when examined, external objective phenomena appear vividly to our senses, yet are void of intrinsic reality (*svabhāva*) [17955, 17974].


A Walk Through Daily Life

To understand how External Emptiness functions in reality, let us map a common contemporary scenario—a stressful workday—against the six external sense fields (*bahirdhā-āyatana*) and observe how we mistakenly solidifying the external world, vs. how "External Emptiness" breaks the spell.

Scenario: The Crowded Subway & An Urgent Email

Imagine you are commuting home on a packed evening train. You are holding your phone, reading a blunt, critical email from your supervisor regarding a missed deadline.

1. Form (*色*) — The Phone Screen & The Train Carriage

* The Error: You stare at the cold glass screen and the grim faces of commuters around you, viewing them as a hostile, heavy, suffocating environment that is out to crush your mood. * Reflecting on External Emptiness: The glass screen, the photons of light forming letters, and the physical bodies on the train are temporary configurations of atomic particles, light, and space (*rūpa*). The physical screen possesses no inherent hostility. The light particles hit your retina and dissolve instant by instant. They are *neither eternal nor extinguished*—they are fluid physical processes [13033].

2. Sound (*聲*) — The Train Noise & Squealing Brakes

* The Error: The screeching metal of the train wheels and the loud phone conversations of nearby passengers feel like an aggressive assault directly targeted at your peace of mind. * Reflecting on External Emptiness: Sound waves are air pressure fluctuations colliding with your eardrum. The screech of the train wheels comes from nowhere and disappears into nowhere (*無來無去*) [17946]. The sound wave itself does not contain "annoyance" inside it; annoyance is created internally when your mind grasps at the sound [13999].

3 & 4. Odor & Taste (*香, 味*) — Stale Air & Cold Coffee

* The Error: The stale, humid smell of the crowded carriage and the bitter, cold taste of leftover coffee in your mouth feel like objective proof that "today is a terrible day." * Reflecting on External Emptiness: Chemical molecules interacting with olfactory and gustatory receptors are brief, compound phenomena (*非積聚*) [15764]. They are transient interactions of conditions, devoid of a static essence called "a bad day."

5. Tactile Objects (*觸*) — Heat & Humidity

* The Error: The stickiness of the muggy train car feels like a heavy blanket trapping you in discomfort. * Reflecting on External Emptiness: Temperature and humidity are thermal exchanges between external matter and body skin. The external thermal condition (*外四大*) is inherently changing and empty of self-nature [17946, 17947].

6. Mental Objects (*法*) — The Meaning of the Supervisor’s Email

* The Error: The text of the email—*"We need to talk about your performance tomorrow morning"*—is converted by your mind into an external, looming monster. You treat this conceptual thought-object as a solid, inescapable reality that dictates your future. * Reflecting on External Emptiness: A mental object (*dharma*) is a concept or image projected before the mind. The words on the screen are symbols; the disaster scenario in your head is a projected mental image. It has no physical solidity, no fixed substance (*不可取*) [15764]. It is as transient and ungraspable as a dream landscape (*境界如夢*) [17955].

When you walk through this scene with the lens of External Emptiness, you realize: The "miserable, hostile world" you were reacting to was a mental solidification of constantly changing, empty external inputs [13999, 17955]. The objects were real as impermanent displays, but empty of the solid, objective reality you attributed to them [13033].


Why Do Contemporary People Need It?

1. Liberation from "Objective" Stress and Anxiety

Modern humans live in an age dominated by external inputs: endless notification feeds, stock market charts, news headlines, and social media metrics. We tend to view these digital and physical environments as absolute, unyielding realities that possess power over us. Contemplating External Emptiness acts as a cognitive circuit-breaker. When you realize that the external digital display or urban noise is "empty of fixed self-nature" (*性自爾*), its power to intimidate, hypnotize, or paralyze you vanishes [13033, 13999].

2. A Bridge with Modern Science (and Its Boundaries)

In modern cognitive neuroscience and predictive processing models (e.g., Donald Hoffman’s *User Interface Theory of Perception* or Karl Friston’s *Free Energy Principle*), science confirms that what we perceive as "the external world" is a simplified, reconstructed neural rendering constructed by our brain, not the "raw objective reality in-itself." Quantum field theory similarly reveals that physical matter is not made of solid, indivisible bricks, but of fluid, relational fields of probability.

* The Parallel: Both perspectives agree that the naive realisms of everyday perception—assuming things are solid, fixed, and objectively existing exactly as we see them—are inaccurate representations of nature. * The Critical Difference & Boundary: Cognitive science and physics operate primarily within the realm of empirical observation, mathematical modeling, and functional utility (how the brain constructs models to survive). **External Emptiness (*Bahirdhā-śūnyatā*) in Buddhism is an experiential, meditative wisdom (*prajñā*)** designed specifically to sever craving (*tṛṣṇā*), clinging (*upādāna*), and existential suffering (*duḥkha*) [13999, 15764]. Science provides models of the physical world; Buddhist emptiness provides absolute spiritual liberation from attachment to that world [13428, 15144].

3. Transforming Generosity and Action (The *Bodhisattva* Path)

In the *Maha Ratnakuta Sutra*, External Emptiness is listed as part of the **"Four Legal Seals of Giving" (*四施以法見印*)**: *Internal Emptiness, External Emptiness, Person Emptiness, Path Emptiness* [19448]. When a contemporary person does charity or engages in social work, they often fall into burnout or arrogance because they treat the given items, money, or external world as solid badges of achievement. By grounding action in External Emptiness, one gives freely without clinging to the material gift, the external reward, or the social applause [19448].


Common Misunderstandings & Clarifications

Misunderstanding 1: "External Emptiness means the outside world doesn't exist at all (Nihilism/Idealism)."

* Clarification: External Emptiness is not Solipsism (the belief that only my mind exists) nor is it Nihilism (the belief that nothing exists). The sutras explicitly state that external objects are "neither eternal nor extinguished" (*非常非滅*) [13033]. Forms, sounds, and physical forces exist conventionally (*samvṛti-satya*) as dependent arisings. What is empty (*śūnya*) is their **inherent, independent existence (*svabhāva*)**. They exist like a dream (*如夢*) [17955]—the dream display is experienced, but the solid objects within it lack independent reality.

Misunderstanding 2: "External Emptiness means I should ignore environmental issues, climate, or society."

* Clarification: In the Mahāyāna tradition, understanding External Emptiness is the very foundation for compassionate intervention [15764]. As the *Mahāsaṁnipāta Sūtra* emphasizes, only a practitioner who understands the empty, unfixable nature of external phenomena (*非積聚, 不可壞*) can skillfully navigate the chaotic world to rescue sentient beings without getting caught in despair or dogmatism [15764].

Misunderstanding 3: "Internal Emptiness is real mind, External Emptiness is fake matter (Creating a Dualism)."

* Clarification: The *Maha Prajnaparamita Sutra* warns against creating a dualistic boundary between internal and external [12217]. The ultimate realization requires **"not seeing external emptiness within internal emptiness, nor seeing internal emptiness within external emptiness" (*內空中不見外空、外空中不見內空*)** [12217]. The inner observer (senses/mind) and the outer observed (objects/world) arise together dependently. To cling to "External Emptiness" as a fixed concept or state (*取外空相*) is itself an obstacle (*礙法*) to true liberation [14099].


Summary in the Liberation Path

Within the broader Buddhist path to liberation, External Emptiness serves as the crucial counterpart to **Internal Emptiness (*ādhyātma-śūnyatā*)** [15524].

If you only realize Internal Emptiness (that the "self" or "internal sense organs" are empty), you might still treat the external world as a real, terrifying, or tempting monster. You might seek escape into a private inner sanctuary.

By realizing External Emptiness, the "outer world" ceases to be a prison wall or a site of obsession [13999, 14330]. The boundary between inner and outer dissolves [11679]. Free from clinging to external forms, sounds, and objects, the heart abides in unshakeable clarity, serenity, and boundless action [13428, 15144].

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义 外空(bahirdhā-śūnyatā)是佛教大乘般若学说中的重要空义之一,指一切外在客观现象(即外法)皆空无自性、不可得的本质。在经典论述中,「外法」主要指色、声、香、味、触、法等六种外界客观对境。外空的本质在于这些外在现象「非常非灭」且「性自尔」(自性本来如此),或者表现为「非积聚、不可坏、不可取」。此外,外空亦涵盖了身外风界、外虚空界等物质与空间现象的空寂性,其体性自空,无去无来。

二、主要阐述 各大乘经典从不同角度对「外空」进行了深入的阐释,主要包括以下三个维度: 1. 外在现象的空性本质:经典指出,外在的色境等客观现象本质上是空无自性的。《摩诃般若波罗蜜经》强调外法(色、声、香、味、触、法)皆空,其空性在于「非常非灭」,且其「性自尔」。《大方等大集经》则指出,外法之空在于其「非积聚、不可坏、不可取」。《大宝积经》进一步将外空具体化,剖析了「外风界」与「外虚空界」的空性。其中,「身外风界」在兴起与摧毁世界时无来无去,生灭皆空,体性自空,且与内风界「二俱皆空」;「外虚空界」则具有「不动,性无变易」的特征,其空非是有法。同时,该经以「境界如梦」为喻,说明外在客观对境虽有显现,但实则空无实体。 2. 禅修实践中的观照方式:在修行实践中,外空是不可或缺的观照对象。《大方等大集经》记载,比丘在禅修中修习止观、观照呼吸时,若能达到「不见我所及外色相」的状态,即是「外空」的实践。这种观照能产生强大的「空力」,坏灭一切内外色相,使修行者断除觉观、远离心意识,进而证得果位或陀罗尼。《摩诃般若波罗蜜经》则对菩萨的般若实践提出了更高要求:菩萨应达到「内空中不见外空、外空中不见内空」的无分别境界,并以方便力对外空等诸空「无诸忆想分别」。若修行者执著于外空的相状(即「取外空相」)并以此回向,则会流于「碍法」,无法无碍地修行般若波罗蜜。 3. 菩萨行与度化众生的应用:外空不仅是自利的禅修,更是菩萨度化众生的基石。《摩诃般若波罗蜜经》将外空视为「菩萨等法」之一,菩萨应修学并安住其中以成就无上菩提。《大方等大集经》指出,能够简择并修习外空等诸空法门,是菩萨堪能拔济众生、将其安置于三乘无为界的前提。《大宝积经》则将外空纳入「四施以法见印」(内空、外空、人空、道空),作为引导菩萨行布施时不执著于外在施物与果报的智慧印证。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异 在不同的经典和译本中,关于外空及相关法相的术语使用存在明显的差异: 1. 关于「五蕴」的译语:《摩诃般若波罗蜜经》(《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》)与《大方等大集经》(《大方等大集經》)均习惯使用「五阴」或「五荫」这一早期译语。 2. 关于「处」的译语:《摩诃般若波罗蜜经》使用「内六入、外六入」或「十二入」来指代六处与十二处;《大方等大集经》亦使用「内六入」与「外六入」。 3. 独特术语与程式化表述:《大宝积经》(《大寶積經》)使用了「外空性」、「身外风界/外风界」、「外虚空界」等特定名相,并在布施章节中独创了「四施以法见印」;而《大方等大集经》在阐释外空时,则统一采用了「非积聚、不可坏、不可取」及「何以故?诸法性尔」的程式化因果问答表述。

四、与相关概念的关系 外空与多个核心佛教概念紧密相连,构成了有机的理论体系: 1. 与「内空」及「内外空」的关系:外空与内空(内在感官之空)相对且相辅相成。《大宝积经》将「观眼等内空」与「色等外空性」并提;《大方等大集经》指出如来悉知一切,正是基于对内空、外空、内外空的彻证;《摩诃般若波罗蜜经》则强调「内空中不见外空、外空中不见内空」的非对立性。 2. 与「众生不可得」的关系:《摩诃般若波罗蜜经》强调,正因为「众生不可得」,故当知外空、内空等十八空皆成立,将外空与无我教理紧密结合。 3. 与「三乘」及「世间空」的关系:在《摩诃般若波罗蜜经》中,因外空等诸空,三乘皆不可得,以此不可得能护持菩萨;同时,般若波罗蜜能「示外空世间空」,显示世间一切外在现象的空寂本质。

五、代表性原文引用 1. 《摩诃般若波罗蜜经》:「外法名色、声、香、味、触、法。色色空,非常非灭故。何以故?性自尔。声、香、味、触、法法空,非常非灭故。何以故?性自尔。是名外空。」 2. 《大方等大集经》:「比丘观出入息,不见我所及外色相,是名外空。」 3. 《大方等大集经》:「云何名外空?外法者,谓色、声、香、味、触、法。色色空,乃至法法空。非积聚、不可坏、不可取。何以故?诸法性尔。是名外空。」 4. 《大宝积经》:「观眼等内空,色等外空性」 5. 《大宝积经》:「身外风界者,身外所有,身所不取不受者……生时亦空、灭时亦空,体性自空。」

By SutraAI-generated

入中論善顯密意疏B0044 · 藏傳論典部

《入中論善顯密意疏》對「外空——觀外在諸法無自性」之論述,以觀察外在六境皆無自性為核心要義。本疏為藏傳論典部中宗喀巴所造、法尊所譯之作,以下分數端說明其論述脈絡。

一、外空之核心定義與偈頌。本疏以頌文明確界定外空:「由本性爾故,色由色性空,聲香味及觸,并諸法亦爾,色等無自性,是名為外空。」 此即說明色法由色之自性而空,聲、香、味、觸及諸法亦復如是;正因色等諸法皆無自性,故立名為外空。

二、外空之釋義——「相續不攝之色等六境」。疏文進一步解釋:「相續不攝之色等六境,由自性空之無自性,名為外空。」 此處所用術語值得留意:疏以「相續不攝」標示「外」之範圍,即不攝歸心識相續之六境(色聲香味觸法),由自性空故而說為無自性。又云「外色由色自性空,即彼色之本性故」,顯明色之空性即是色之本來面目;聲、香、味、觸、法之性空之理亦當如是了知。此中所用「色等六境」「自性空」等詞,與內空相對而立。

三、空性之體性——「非常非壞」。疏文指出:「此空及餘空,經說:『非常非壞。』」 說明外空及諸空之體性並非常住不變,亦非可壞之法;此與前說內空時所論一致,應當如是了知其本性。

四、總標觀察無自性之根本前提。疏中亦總示:「設若觀察此諸法,離真實性無可得,是故不應妄觀察,世間所有名言諦。」 此明一切諸法離真實性皆不可得,然於世俗名言諦中不應作虛妄之觀察,此為論述外空所依之根本前提。

五、外空與空空之關連。疏文繼外空而論及空空:「內外諸法,如前所說是無自性。善巧真理之智者,說名空性本性。」 內外諸法之本性空性,更由空性之自性或實有而空,是為遣除執空性為實有之妄執,故般若經宣說空空;又引「出世讚」云:「為除諸分別,故說甘露空,若復執著空,佛說極可呵。」 顯示外空之觀察不僅遣除外在諸法之執,亦遮破對空性之執著。

六、本疏術語特點。綜觀全文,本疏以「外空」一詞專指對外在六境無自性之觀察,以「相續不攝之色等六境」界定「外」之範圍並與內空區隔;表述重心在「色等無自性」「自性空」之互文。

摩訶般若波羅蜜經T0223 · 般若部

《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》對「外空」之論述,以佛自答須菩提之問為核心定義:「何等為外空?外法名色聲香味觸法。色,色空,非常非滅故。何以故?性自爾。聲,聲空;香,香空;味,味空;觸,觸空;法,法空,非常非滅故。何以故?性自爾。是名外空。」 此處「外法」專指六外處(六塵),即色、聲、香、味、觸、法,與「內法」之六內處(眼耳鼻舌身意)對舉。每一外法各各自空——「色,色空」「聲,聲空」——其空之理由統歸「非常非滅故,性自爾」,既非因壞滅而空,亦非常住之空,乃法性本然如此。此「非常非滅」「性自爾」之表述為本經論十八空之固定句式,貫穿內空、內外空、空空、大空、第一義空等一切空目。

本經論外空之獨特結構,在於「互不見」之展轉否定:須菩提言菩薩行般若波羅蜜時,「內空中不見外空、外空中不見內空,外空中不見內外空、內外空中不見外空」,如是展轉乃至「無法有法空中不見有法空」。 此非謂外空不存在,而是諸空各住自相、不相含攝、不相障礙,菩薩於一一空中不取餘空之相,方得「入菩薩位」。此互不見之次第排列,亦即本經十八空之固定序列,外空恆居第二,緊接內空之後。

在修行論上,本經以「方便力」說外空之作用:菩薩行般若波羅蜜,以方便力故不作「我施與彼人」「我持戒」「我修忍」等憶想分別,其所以能無分別,正以「內空、外空、內外空、空空、大空、第一義空、有為空、無為空、畢竟空、無始空、散空、性空、諸法空、自相空故」,是名「無所礙」。 外空於此非觀境之理論概念,而是令菩薩於六度萬行中不取能所、不執我相之實踐根據。

然而本經同時嚴厲警告:若「取外空相」,即執外空為一可得之相,則反成「礙法」。須菩提告釋提桓因:求菩薩道者若「取內空相、外空、內外空乃至無法有法空相」,以取相故迴向菩提,即不能無礙行般若波羅蜜,「是色相不可迴向,受想行識相不可迴向,乃至一切種智相不可迴向」。 空本身亦不可取相,此與「空空」之義相呼應。

在教理功能上,須菩提答舍利弗:般若波羅蜜中廣說三乘而不可得,其因緣即「以內空故」乃至「外空乃至無法有法空故」;護持菩薩、得捷疾辯乃至一切世間最上辯,亦以「外空乃至無法有法空故,不可得故」。 外空與諸空共為三乘不可得之理據。

最後,佛以「等法」攝外空:「內空是菩薩等法;外空乃至無法有法空,是菩薩等法。」住是等法,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。 外空非偏空、非斷滅,與色空乃至一切種智空平等無二,菩薩住此平等法而證無上菩提。

綜觀本經,「外空」一詞之術語形式固定為「外空」,所空之境固定為「色聲香味觸法」六外處,空之理據固定為「非常非滅故,性自爾」,未見以「外法空」「六塵空」等異名替代。本經不另立外空之體性議論,而將外空置於十八空序列與菩薩行證之脈絡中反覆運用。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》論「外空」,見於兩處語境,一為佛果所證,一為菩薩修行,術語形式與歸類方式各有不同。

一、佛所證菩提中之外空性。經以偈頌述諸佛證菩提之境界:「諸佛證菩提,寂靜極寂靜,觀眼等內空,色等外空性。」 此處「外空」以「外空性」之名出現,與「內空」對舉。其分界甚明:內空所觀為「眼等」,即眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意諸內處;外空所觀為「色等」,即色、聲、香、味、觸、法諸外處。經文以「性」字綴於外空之後,作「外空性」,強調此非僅為觀照之動作,乃所觀諸法之本然實性。此觀照屬佛果位上之自證,偈中繼言「有情不覺悟,寂靜極寂靜,如來知句義,於彼起大悲」,謂眾生不了此內外空性之寂靜,如來由是興大悲心。 是故外空性在此非單純之析法歸空,而與菩提之「無根無所住」「無去來取捨」「無相無境界」同為一寂靜實相之異名,眾生迷此而佛悲之。

二、菩薩布施中四法印之一。經於散說菩薩施度無極時,列「四施以法見印」:「一曰內空,二曰外空,三曰人空,四曰道空。」 此處徑稱「外空」,不帶「性」字,且置於四空之第二,與內空、人空、道空並列。此四空為菩薩行布施時以正法之見印可其施,令施不墮有為果報。經文上文方明布施當離常想、安想、淨想、我想四種思想,又當捨非法、捨聲聞意、捨緣覺法、遠諸倚著,四空即承此離執之脈絡而立。 此處四空之分法——內、外、人、道——乃《大寶積經》此會特有之略說形式,與廣列十八空、二十空之經不同。

三、術語形式之異。同一經中,偈頌用「外空性」,散文用「外空」,前者側重所證之理體,後者側重能觀之行目。又偈中以「色等」界定外空之所觀範圍,散文則未另加釋,直列名目而已。兩處皆以「內空」與「外空」對舉,內屬根身、外屬塵境之基本分判一致。

綜而觀之,《大寶積經》論外空,一在果上顯其為菩提寂靜實相之一面,一在因上攝其為菩薩法施之正見印可;用語有「外空性」與「外空」之別,歸類有內、外、人、道四空並列之略式,皆此經之特徵。

Related