Dharma · AI Companion

有為空

saṃskṛtaśūnyatā

观有为诸法皆无自性AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span II · emptiness ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

有为空为空义之一支,究竟读法同归离言空性(比照空锚 2→4)。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Saying

In the Buddhist path of liberation, 有為空 (saṃskṛta-śūnyatā, "emptiness of the conditioned") is a sharp blade that cuts through ordinary beings' attachment to substantial existence. To understand it precisely, we must first break it into its two core words: 有為法 (saṃskṛta-dharma, "conditioned phenomena") and 空 (śūnyatā, "emptiness").

1. What Are "Conditioned Phenomena"?

"為" (conditioning) means fabrication and the coming together of causes and conditions. Whatever phenomena gather, arise, change, and cease in dependence on the aggregation of causes and conditions are collectively called "conditioned phenomena." Classical treatises strictly divide all conditioned phenomena into two great categories, which must not be narrowed down to mere matter or the physical body: * 色法 (rūpa-dharma, material phenomena): refers to all material phenomena, defined in the scriptures as the material world constituted by the four great elements 地、水、火、风 ("earth, water, fire, wind"). It includes both our bodily experience (inner matter, 内色) and the external physical world seen by the eyes and heard by the ears (outer matter, 外色). * 非色法(心心数法)(non-material phenomena; citta-caitta-dharma, mental phenomena): refers to all mental phenomena. "心" (citta) means the mind-king (the dominant perceiving consciousness), and "心数法" (caitta-dharma — rendered in later translations as 心所法, "mental factors") refers to the various mental activities and emotional fabrications that accompany the mind-king (such as greed, anger, delusion, thought, intention, etc.).

2. The True Meaning of "Emptiness of the Conditioned": Moment-to-Moment Arising and Ceasing, and Lack of Self-Nature

Ordinary beings often mistakenly believe that there exists, within the mental or material world, some "permanent, unchanging entity" (自性, svabhāva, "self-nature"). "Emptiness of the conditioned" reveals the true characteristics of conditioned phenomena on two levels:

* Dependent origination through causes and conditions; no self-nature: No conditioned phenomenon exists in isolation; each is a combination of multiple causes and conditions. The scriptures use the arising of 识 (vijñāna, "consciousness/perception") as an example: for a single act of perception to arise, it must depend on the coming together of the eye faculty (眼根), a visible object (色尘), light, attention (心念), and mental engagement (作意, manasikāra), among other conditions. If we dissect these conditions, we find that this "consciousness" is not located in the eye faculty, not in the visible object, not in the light, and not even in the gaps between these factors. It has no independent, autonomous "self-nature" (an indivisible, independently existing entity). Because it arises in dependence on conditions, it is called "self-natureless" (无自性). * Clinging and succession; moment-to-moment arising and ceasing: Take the "mind" (心), which is most easily mistaken for a "self," as an example. The mind's nature is the "characteristic of clinging to objects" (攀缘相). Eye-consciousness, mind-consciousness, visible objects, and mental objects arise and cease in extremely subtle instants (刹那, kṣaṇa). The mind of one moment and the mind of the next moment are entirely different. Yet because the psychological experiences of successive moments are extremely similar — like frames of a continuously playing film — ordinary beings see this illusion of "similar continuity" and mistakenly believe that a permanent, unchanging "mind" or "self" exists within it.

The classical scriptures sum up this state in one sentence: "本有今无,本无今有。三世有法,无有是处。" *"What was present before is now absent; what was absent before is now present. To hold that any dharma truly exists across the three times — past, present, and future — is utterly impossible."*

3. Manifesting the Middle-Way Reality of "Neither Existent nor Non-Existent"

"Emptiness" is by no means annihilationism (negating the existence of phenomena and falling into nothingness). The 《大般涅槃经》 (Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra) presents an extremely precise middle-way view: * Because it arises from conditions, it is called "existent": Because causes and conditions function, phenomena do appear, illusory as they are; their phenomenal existence (provisional existence, 假有) cannot be denied. * Because it lacks self-nature, it is called "non-existent": Because analysis to the very bottom reveals no independent, permanent entity, it is said to lack self-nature (empty of nature, 性空).

Therefore, the essence of conditioned phenomena is the middle way of "neither existent nor non-existent" (非有非无).

4. A Crucial Boundary: The Strict Separation of "Emptiness of the Conditioned" from "Buddha-Nature / Unconditioned Dharma"

In the complete teaching of the 《大般涅槃经》, establishing "emptiness of the conditioned" has a crucial soteriological positioning: it strictly separates "conditioned phenomena" from "unconditioned dharma (Buddha-nature / nirvāṇa)". All conditioned, fabricated phenomena — the 五阴 (pañcaskandha, five aggregates), the 十八界 (aṣṭādaśa-dhātu, eighteen elements), the 十二入 (dvādaśa-āyatana, twelve sense bases), and so forth — are all impermanent, self-natureless, and empty. But the "Buddha-nature / emptiness of the ultimate truth" (佛性/第一义空, buddhadhātu / paramārtha-śūnyatā), which transcends conditioned arising and ceasing and is permanent and undying, does not fall within the scope of "emptiness of the conditioned." This separation draws a clear line between "the impermanent emptiness of the phenomenal world" and "the permanence, bliss, self, and purity (常乐我净) of the liberated realm," preventing practitioners from mistaking the "emptiness" that cuts through attachment for the "annihilating nothingness" in which everything is nonexistent.


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

To avoid leaving "emptiness of the conditioned" as an abstract noun, we can walk through the concept completely, according to the classical definition, using the most familiar contemporary scenario — scrolling short videos / social media on one's phone:

Scenario: Emotional Fluctuations While Scrolling Late at Night

1. Walkthrough of material phenomena (色法, rūpa-dharma, made of the four elements): * Phenomenon: Your hand holds the cold phone screen, your eyes receive light emitted by light-emitting diodes, your eardrums vibrate with sound waves. * Mapping: This is "material phenomena" (earth, water, fire, wind). The phone hardware, the light, the sound waves, and your eyeballs and palms are all temporary gatherings of material elements. They wear down, dissipate heat, and age every second, without a single moment of pause in arising and ceasing. 2. Walkthrough of mental phenomena (非色法, citta-caitta-dharma) and the arising of "consciousness": * Phenomenon: You scroll to a trending topic that makes you angry or anxious. In an instant your chest tightens, and a strong emotion and an urge to comment arise. * Mapping: How did this "anxious/angry consciousness" come about? It arose in an instant from the coming together of conditions: the eye faculty (eyes), the visible object (screen images), light, the cognitive views you have formed in the past (mind-states), and attention (作意). Does this "anger" exist in the phone? No. Does it exist in your eyes? No. It is entirely a product of interwoven conditions. 3. Breaking "similar continuity mistaken for permanence": * Phenomenon: You feel, "My mood tonight is terrible; I am an anxious person." * Mapping: This is where ordinary beings most easily mis-map (mistaking continuity for permanence). In fact, your mind clings to different images: a second ago a funny video brought slight joy; this second the news brings anger; the next second an ad brings numbness. Every single "mind and mental factor" is arising and ceasing moment by moment — "what was absent is now present; what was present is now absent." But because these emotions succeed one another continuously and the sensory experiences are extremely similar, the brain affixes a label, producing the illusion that "there exists a continuously anxious 'me.'" 4. The middle way and the practical landing of "emptiness of the conditioned": * Phenomenon: How should one view this moment of anxiety? * Mapping: * If you think "this anxiety is false; it doesn't really exist," you fall into annihilationism (ignoring that "because it arises from conditions, it is called existent" — the tight chest and racing heart are real physiological and psychological phenomena). * If you think "I am just an anxious person; this anxiety won't go away," you fall into substantialism (ignoring that "because it lacks self-nature, it is called non-existent"). * Middle-way insight: See this emotion as merely a product of gathered causes and conditions (conditioned phenomena), arising and ceasing moment by moment, with no fixed entity (empty). When conditions gather, it arises; when conditions disperse, it ceases. Let go of calculating and clinging to it, and the anxiety naturally dissolves along with the conditions.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary life is highly digitized and algorithmized, and the human mind faces an unprecedented "overload of conditioned phenomena":

1. Deconstructing the mental exhaustion caused by "information and emotional inflation" Algorithmic recommendation mechanisms exploit precisely the innate nature of human "mind and mental factors" (心心数法) to continually cling to external objects. A contemporary person receives tens of thousands of pieces of information daily, triggering countless tiny emotional fluctuations. Without the wisdom of "emptiness of the conditioned," we take every conditionally arisen emotion (anxiety, comparison, inferiority) as a substantial "self" and are led by the nose by a flood of impermanent phenomena. "Emptiness of the conditioned" reminds us: every emotion and thought stimulated by algorithms, screens, and information is nothing but a bubble of gathered causes and conditions, arising and ceasing moment by moment, with no real substance — we need not pay the full price for them.

2. Using "AI and algorithmic life" as a mirror of unreality We can use contemporary AI and brain science as analogical tools for experiencing "emptiness of the conditioned": the generative mechanism of AI large language models is an excellent demonstration of "lack of self-nature" — no single parameter possesses "thought"; only when massive data, computing power, and prompts (causes and conditions) come together does an apparently intelligent answer emerge. Once the power is cut or the input is removed (conditions dispersed), the so-called "intelligence" vanishes without a trace. * *Note on limitations and open questions*: It should be made clear that AI's emergent computational power is only a material and logical analogy for "dependent arising through causes and conditions." Science and neuroscience still have no definitive answer to the "hard problem of consciousness" — how consciousness (识) actually arises from neuronal firing. A scientific analogy in no way proves the extremely subtle Buddhist account of "mind and mental factors" and the meaning of self-nature emptiness.

3. Breaking the illusion of "permanent stability" and gaining steadiness in the face of impermanence Modern people desperately seek certainty — stable jobs, eternal relationships, unchanging body and mind. Yet "三世有法,无有是处" — "that any dharma truly exists across the three times is impossible." All conditioned phenomena are fundamentally impermanent and subject to arising and ceasing. Understanding "emptiness of the conditioned" does not lead one to passive resignation; rather, it allows one, when facing the storms of impermanence — unemployment, aging, changing relationships — to no longer feel that the world is collapsing. Because you know that change itself is the very nature of conditioned phenomena. In the midst of impermanent phenomena, remaining unattached reveals the deep, inner peace that is not turned by circumstances.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

* Misreading 1: Understanding "emptiness of the conditioned" as "conditioned phenomena fundamentally do not exist; everything is nothingness" * Clarification: This is a classic fall into "annihilating emptiness" (断灭空). The scriptures explicitly state "because it arises from conditions, it is called existent." In the phenomenal world, conditioned phenomena genuinely function in terms of cause and effect (eating poison makes you sick; doing evil brings suffering). "Emptiness" means it lacks an independent, permanent self-nature — it does not deny the existence of phenomena and the law of cause and effect.

* Misreading 2: Treating the "mind" as a fixed, unchanging spiritual soul * Clarification: Many people think the body (material phenomena) is impermanent, but that within the mind (non-material phenomena) there is a permanent "soul" or "true self." The classical entries explicitly classify "mind and mental factors" (心心数法) under conditioned phenomena, stating that "the mind is impermanent, since its self-nature belongs to the characteristic of clinging to objects." The mind is a succession of mental activities arising and ceasing moment by moment; ordinary beings merely "reckon it as permanent" because of the similarity of the successive moments.

* Misreading 3: If "everything is empty," then are Buddha-nature and nirvāṇa also conditioned, impermanent bubbles? * Clarification: This is a boundary that Mahāyāna scriptures — especially the 《大般涅槃经》 — emphasize extremely strongly. The text strictly distinguishes "conditioned phenomena" from "Buddha-nature / unconditioned dharma." Conditioned phenomena arise from causes and conditions, hence "emptiness of the conditioned"; but Buddha-nature is a permanent dharma not produced by causes and conditions, transcending the scope of emptiness of the conditioned. If emptiness were applied without limit to every dimension, one would fall into nihilism and obliterate the ultimate support for cultivating and realizing liberation.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在佛学体系中,“有为空”(saṃskṛta-śūnyatā)是一个至关重要的概念。根据《大般涅槃经》(北凉昙无谶译)的系统论述,“有为空”是指一切因缘和合而生的有为之法,其自性悉皆是空。有为法由于是因缘所生,因而具有无常、念念生灭的本质,没有任何恒常不变的实体可得。理解“有为空”的核心要义,在于通过对有为法无自性的观察,破除凡夫对于三世实有、常恒不变的错误执著,从而显现非有非无的中道实相。这一概念不仅厘清了物质与精神现象的虚妄性,更通过将“佛性”等无为法与有为法进行严格区隔,确立了涅槃部经典独特的空乐不二与中道思想。

二、主要阐述

《大般涅槃经》对有为空的阐述,主要从有为法的分类、无常生灭的本质、因缘和合的机制以及中道实相四个维度展开:

首先,关于有为法的分类及其无常本质。经中将一切有为法清晰地划分为“色法”与“非色法”两大类。其中,“色法”具体指代地、水、火、风四大物质元素;而“非色法”则被称为“心心数法”,即心王与心所等精神现象。经文强调,凡是属于有为范畴的法,皆是无常的,因为凡是从因缘生起的法,都绝不能称之为“常”。以凡夫最易执着为常的“心”为例,经中详细剖析了心的无常性:心之所以是无常的,是因为其自性属于攀缘相,且眼识、意识、色境界、法境界等在每一刹那都是各不相同的。然而,由于这些法在极其迅速的生灭过程中,前相与后相高度相似,凡夫在见到这种相似的相续之后,便会产生错觉,错误地计执其为常恒不变的实体。

其次,经文通过因缘和合的机制,深入论证了有为法的“无自性”特征。经中以精神现象中“识”的产生作为典型例证,指出“识”并不是孤立存在的,而是必须依凭眼根、色尘、明光明、心念、作意等多种因缘和合才能生起。然而,如果仔细剖析这些因缘,就会发现这个所谓的“识”,决定不存在于眼根之中,也不存在于色尘、光明、心念等任何单一的要素之中,甚至也不存在于这些要素的中间。这表明,有为法并没有独立自主的自性。

再者,基于无自性的观察,诸佛菩萨为众生显示了“非有非无”的中道实相。经中指出,诸法“从缘生故,名之为有;无自性故,名之为无”,因此,有为法的真实相状是非有、非无的。这种中道观直接否定了断灭空与执着实有的两边偏见。

最后,为了彻底破除众生对三世实有及时间常恒性的执著,经中反复运用特定的偈颂进行开示,即“本有今无,本无今有。三世有法,无有是处”(或作“本无今有,本有今无”)。这一论述表明,过去、现在、未来三世之中,并没有一个恒常存在的“法”可以被执取,一切有为法皆是在因缘中生灭,本无自性。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《大般涅槃经》(北凉昙无谶译)中,论述有为法空时展现出了非常独特的译词特征与表述习惯,这些术语与后译本或其他大乘经典存在明显的差异:

1. 阴界入:在统称构成众生身心的基本要素时,本译本习惯使用“阴界入”这一术语,即指代五阴(在其他译本中多译为“五蕴”)、十八界与十二入(在其他译本中多译为“十二处”)。这种译词保留了早期汉译佛经的古朴风格。 2. 心心数法:在指代精神现象时,本译本使用“心心数法”来统称心王与心所。而在后期的唯识等部类经典中,则更倾向于使用“心、心所法”或“心及心所有法”。 3. 偈颂的异译与交替使用:在破除三世实有的论述中,经中对于核心偈颂的表述存在微细的词序调整。在某些品中,译为“本有今无,本无今有。三世有法,無有是處”;而在另一些品中,则作“本無今有,本有今無。三世有法,無有是處”。这种词序的交替使用,反映了译者在传译过程中对梵文原意不同侧重点的表达。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与“佛性”的关系: 这是《大般涅槃经》中关于有为空论述中最具特色的一点。经文明确将“佛性”与有为法进行了严格的区隔。虽然一切有为法皆是空(即有为空),但“佛性”并非有为法,它是超越因缘生灭的常住之法,因此佛性不属于有为法空的范畴。这一区分避免了将空义推向虚无主义,确保了如来藏、佛性常住思想的建立。 2. 与“空”的分类关系: 有为空并不是孤立的,它与内空、外空、内外空、常乐我净空,以及众生空、寿命空、如来空、法空、僧空、第一义空等共同构成了大乘佛教广阔的空义体系。有为空主要针对的是因缘所生的一切现象,而第一义空等则指向更深层次的实相。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 关于有为法分类与无常之阐述: “一切有為法皆是無常。凡是因緣所生之法,皆不得名之為常。色法與非色法,非色法名心心數法,色法名地水火風。心是無常,以其自性屬攀緣相,眼識、意識、色境界、法境界等各不相同。相似相續,凡夫見已,計之為常。” 2. 关于因缘和合与中道之阐述: “識依眼、色、明、心、念等因緣和合而生,此識不在此等因緣之中,亦不在其中間。諸佛菩薩顯示中道:從緣生故,名之為有;無自性故,名之為無。故說諸法非有、非無。” 3. 破除三世实有之偈颂: “本有今無,本無今有。三世有法,無有是處。” “本無今有,本有今無。三世有法,無有是處。”

By SutraAI-generated

入中論善顯密意疏B0044 · 藏傳論典部

《入中論善顯密意疏》以「三界從緣生」作為說明有為法的直接起點:三界諸法由因緣而生,正因具有從緣而生的性質,故被稱為「有為」。本論並非先作繁複分類,而是以緣生總攝三界有為諸法,明確建立「從緣生」與「有為」之間的名稱關係。

在此基礎上,本論緊接著說「彼由彼性空,說名有為空」。其中「彼」指前述三界;三界雖因從緣而生而名為有為,但即彼三界由其自性空,故名「有為空」。因此,本論所說的有為空,不是離開有為諸法另立一種空,而是就從緣所生的三界本身,指出其自性為空。

本論的核心術語形式是「有為空」,其釋語則是「由彼自性空」。原頌使用較凝練的「彼由彼性空」,隨後釋文改以「即彼三界由彼自性空」加以明示,使所空之法與所空的意義皆更清楚:所論者是三界有為法,所說之空是其自性空。

本論又以無為作對照:沒有生、住、異、滅之法,名為「無為」;即彼無為由其自性空,名為「無為空」。此段顯示本論在術語安排上,分別依有為與無為而說「有為空」及「無為空」,兩者都以「由彼自性空」為釋義;但有為法的命名特徵,仍專在其從緣而生。

進一步說到「自相空」時,本論同時提出「有為自相」與「無為自相」,並說彼等自相由其自性空,故名「自相空」。這從另一側面補充了有為空的表述:不僅三界有為法由自性空,其有為法之自相亦由自性空;原文採用的術語正是「自相」與「自相空」。

就多譯名歸一而言,本論在這組原文中明確使用「三界」、「有為」、「有為空」、「自性空」、「有為自相」及「自相空」等詞;核心句式為「從緣生,故說名有為」與「由彼自性空,說名有為空」。原文沒有另以其他名稱替代「有為空」,亦未在此處另行展開有為諸法的細目。

大般涅槃經(北本)T0374 · 涅槃部

《大般涅槃經(北本)》於菩薩摩訶薩諸空觀之序列中安立「有為空」一名,其核心表述為:「有為空者,有為之法悉皆是空。」經文以總括句先定其義,再以「所謂」列舉所攝諸空:內空、外空、內外空、常樂我淨空、眾生壽命如來法僧第一義空。由此可見,本經將有為空視為統攝性的空觀範疇,舉凡內法、外法、內外法,乃至常樂我淨、眾生壽命、如來法僧、第一義等諸空相,皆攝入有為法之空中,顯示有為法涵蓋菩薩所觀一切空相之總聚。

本經論有為空最獨特之處,在於劃定一條明確界限:「是中佛性,非有為法,是故佛性非有為法空。」佛性雖在內法中為經文所提及,卻不被有為法之空所攝。經文於前段論內空時已鋪陳此義:「是內法中,雖有佛性,而是佛性,非內非外。所以者何?佛性常住,無變易故。」佛性以「常住」「無變易」之體性故,超出有為法之範域,不隨有為法而空。此即本經有為空論述之關鍵限定:有為法悉空,而佛性不空——非謂佛性另不空,乃因其根本不屬有為法,故不在有為空之所觀。

有為空之後,經文接以「無為空」,二者構成對舉。無為法亦「悉皆是空」,其所空者為無常、苦、不淨、無我、陰界入、眾生壽命相、有為、有漏、內法、外法等。然而「無為法中,佛等四法,非有為,非無為。性是善故,非無為;性常住故,非有為。」如來、法、僧、佛性此四法既不入有為空,亦不入無為空,以其性善、常住故,超然於有為與無為二邊之外。有為空與無為空合觀,則見本經以佛性四法為不空之歸趣,其餘一切有為、無為法則皆歸於空寂。

術語方面,本經用「陰界入」而非「陰界處」,以「入」攝十二入(處);用「眾生壽命」表達人我之空,而非「補特伽羅」或「人我」;以「常樂我淨」為固定四字連用,既用以描述佛性四法之不空德性,亦用以標舉所空之對象(常樂我淨空)。有為空之定義句式為「有為之法悉皆是空」,以「悉皆」表周遍義,再以「所謂」引出細目,形成先總後分、以佛性為例外之論述結構。

大智度論T1509 · 釋經論部

《大智度論》釋「有為空」,先立有為法之定義:「有為法名因緣和合生,所謂五眾、十二入、十八界等」,即以因緣和合為有為法之根本特徵,所列舉者為五眾、十二入、十八界三科。此處用「五眾」而非「五蘊」,乃羅什譯本之慣用術語;又用「十二入」而非「十二處」,同屬本論譯語特色。

有為法所以為空,本論提出「二因緣」:一者、「無我、無我所及常相不變異不可得故空」;二者、「有為法、有為法相空,不生不滅,無所有故」。第一重從眾生不可得說空,第二重則進一步謂有為法自身及其法相皆空。論中設問:常相不可得,究竟是眾生空還是法空?乃引三家之說——或謂計我為常乃心顛倒,常空即入眾生空;或謂執心為常(如梵天王說四大無常而心意識常),常空即入法空;或謂五眾即常、色眾雖變化而不滅,五眾空即是法空。三家歸趣雖異,皆明常空終歸於法空。

本論復從行者觀行角度釋有為空:「行者觀有為法、無為法實相,無有作者,因緣和合故有,皆是虛妄,從憶想分別生;不在內,不在外,不在兩中間。」凡夫以顛倒見故見有為法有,智者則「於有為法不得其相,知但假名,以此假名導引凡夫,知其虛誑無實,無生無作,心無所著」。又明聖人「不緣有為法而得道果,以觀有為法空故,於有為法心不繫著故」——有為空非僅是理論辨析,乃是解脫實踐之觀門。

本論論有為空最獨特之側面,在於有為與無為之相待關係:「離有為則無無為」,「有為法實相即是無為」。有為相謂生、滅、住、異,無為相謂不生、不滅、不住、不異;若無為法有相則成有為。論中明言有為、無為二空所以合說,乃因「有為、無為法相待而有,若除有為則無無為,若除無為則無有為。是二法攝一切法」。行者觀有為法無常、苦、空等過患,知無為法所益處廣,故二事合說。而無為法所以亦空,一則以有為實相即無為、二事不異故;二則恐人「聞有為法過罪而著無為法,以著故生諸結使」,論引阿毘曇「八十九有為法緣,六無為法緣」之說,明無為法緣之疑、邪見、無明等結使能起不善業、墮三惡道,故須說無為法空。

在十八空(本論所列為內空、外空、內外空、空空、大空、第一義空、有為空、無為空、畢竟空、無始空、散空、性空、自相空、諸法空、不可得空、無法空、有法空、無法有法空)之次第中,有為空與無為空居第六、第七位,而「畢竟空」正是「以有為空、無為空破諸法,令無有遺餘」之總結——「內空、外空、內外空、十方空、第一義空、有為空、無為空,更無有餘不空法,是名畢竟空」。本論又指出空本身亦須遣除:「如有為空破有為法,是有為空即復為患;復以無為空破無為法」,空亦不可執。

本論另有一處以三界釋有為空,與上引以三科(五眾、十二入、十八界)釋者角度不同:「有為法名欲界、色界、無色界。欲界,欲界空;色界,色界空;無色界,無色界空,非常非滅故。何以故?性自爾。是名有為空。」此處以「非常非滅故,性自爾」為一切空之通式,謂有為法之空非由外力使之斷滅,乃其本性自爾。

Related