Dharma · AI Companion

了因

vyañjaka-hetu

显发既有理性或果德之因AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span III · nominal designation ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

了因显发本有理性,于名言假有层正面安立(3);天台三因佛性以了因即般若,究竟处读至离言(4)。〔判教镜头〕涅槃、天台主本有显发;唯识种姓说有本有始有之诤。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What Is the Concept of "Illuminating Cause" (了因)?

In Buddhist philosophy, particularly in the *Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra* (*Dābān Níbián Jīng* 《大般涅槃經》) translated by Dharmakṣema (曇無讖), causal theory is divided into two fundamental operational mechanisms: the producing cause (*shēngyīn* 生因) and the illuminating cause (*liǎoyīn* 了因).

The canonical definition states: "That which produces a dharma is called a producing cause; like a lamp that illuminates objects, that which makes them known is called an illuminating cause" (能生法者,是名生因;燈能了物,故名了因).

``` ┌─── Producing Cause (生因) ──> Creates new, compounded phenomena (Impermanent / 无常) Causal Mechanisms ───┤ └─── Illuminating Cause (了因) ─> Reveals what is inherently present (Permanent / 常) ```

To understand the liberation path (*jiětuō dào* 解脫道) of Mahāyāna Buddhism, one must master this exact distinction:

* **Producing Cause (*shēngyīn* 生因):** Generates, constructs, or brings into existence a *new* conditioned state or entity that previously did not exist. For example, clay and a potter's wheel produce a clay pot; seed, soil, and rain produce a sprout. Anything created by a producing cause is conditioned (*shǒuwèi* / *yīnyuán fǎ* 因緣法), impermanent (*wúcháng* 無常), subject to decay, and ultimately a source of suffering (*kǔ* 苦). * **Illuminating Cause (*liǎoyīn* 了因):** Does not manufacture or create anything new. Like striking a match in a pitch-black room, the light does not manufacture the furniture, books, or walls inside the room; it merely renders visible what was already fully present but concealed by darkness.

1. Why Nirvana and Buddha-Nature Rely on the Illuminating Cause

In the *Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra*, the Buddha raises a profound question: Is Nirvana (*Níbián* 涅槃) or Buddha-nature (*Fóxìng* 佛性) produced by spiritual practice, or merely revealed by it?

The Sūtra explicitly clarifies that Buddha-nature is a cause, not an effect (佛性者,是因非果), and its realization depends entirely on the illuminating cause. Furthermore, Nirvana is attained through the illuminating cause, not through a producing cause.

If Nirvana were produced by a "producing cause" (i.e., manufactured by our meditation or morality), it would be a fabricated, conditioned phenomenon. Anything manufactured can be un-manufactured; anything born must die. If Nirvana were produced by a cause, it would be "impermanent, non-joyous, non-self, and impure" (*wúcháng, wúlé, wúwǒ, wújìng* 無常、無樂、無我、無淨). Because it is revealed through an illuminating cause, Nirvana is verified as "permanence, bliss, true self, and purity" (*cháng, lè, wǒ, jìng* 常樂我淨).

``` ┌─── Ignorance / Afflictions ──> Produces ──> Samsaric Suffering (Born & Dies) Producing Cause ┤ └─── Material Seeds/Parents ──> Produces ──> Physical Form & Crops

┌─── Six Perfections (六波羅蜜) ┐ Illuminating Cause ──┼─── Eightfold Path (八正道) ├─> Illumines ──> Buddha-Nature / Nirvana └─── Wisdom / Meditation ┘ (Already Inherent, Never Dies) ```

2. The Dynamic Taxonomy of Causes

The Sūtra maps out how these causal categories operate across both mundane (*shìjiān* 世間) and supramundane (*chūshìjiān* 出世間) realms:

* In the Mundane Realm: Afflictions (*fánnǎo* 煩惱) and karmic fetters serve as the *producing cause* of rebirth and suffering, while one's parents act as the *illuminating cause* (or auxiliary condition) for the physical body to manifest. Similarly, the seed of a grain is its *producing cause*, whereas soil, water, and fertilizer function as *illuminating/auxiliary causes* that allow the seed's capacity to show forth. * In the Path to Awakening: The Sūtra presents a subtle, non-dogmatic interplay between causes: * The Six Perfections (*liù bōluómì* 六波羅蜜) and Supreme Perfect Enlightenment (*ānòuduōluó sānmiǎosānpútí* 阿耨多羅三藐三菩提) can be viewed as producing causes (in terms of cultivating transient mundane virtues and faculties). * Simultaneously, the Six Perfections, the Noble Eightfold Path (*bā zhèngdào* 八正道), and Wisdom (*zhìhuì* 智慧) function primarily as illuminating causes that shine upon and reveal the inherent Buddha-nature and uncreated Nirvana.

To avoid the misunderstanding that the fruit is literally hidden inside the cause like a pre-assembled toy, the Buddha debated Bodhisattva Lion's Roar (*Shīzǐhǒu Púsà* 師子吼菩薩). Lion's Roar argued that if an illuminating cause simply "reveals" what's there, then milk must already contain finished butter, or clay must already contain a finished pot.

The Buddha corrected this: 1. An Illuminating Cause Cannot Reveal Itself and Others Indiscriminately: An illuminating cause (like a lamp) illuminates an object, but it cannot function as its own object simultaneously. 2. Practice Is Not Pre-Existing: Human beings do not inherently possess fully formed precepts, concentration, or cultivated wisdom (*jiè, dìng, huì* 戒定慧); these grow gradually through instruction and cultivation. 3. No Nature Means Nothing to Reveal: If there is no underlying potential or nature (*xìng* 性), an illuminating cause cannot reveal anything (e.g., lighting a lamp in empty space will not reveal a hidden tree).

Thus, the Mahāyāna framework unifies this into a triad: Direct Cause (*zhèngyīn* 正因, the innate Buddha-nature / ultimate reality), Auxiliary Cause (*yuányīn* 緣因, cumulative good deeds and practices), and Illuminating Cause (*liǎoyīn* 了因, the illuminating wisdom that directly sees reality).


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life (生活里的走查)

To see how the illuminating cause operates in modern life, let us walk through a typical day of an urban professional—looking at commute, phone scrolling, workplace burnout, and intimate relationships.

``` +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | THE THREE CAUSES IN DAILY LIFE | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | | | [ Direct Cause / 正因 ] | | Inherent Clarity & Awareness (Always present, quiet, undamaged by stress) | | | | │ | | ▼ | | [ Auxiliary Cause / 緣因 ] ────────────────────────────────────────┐ | | Constructive actions: Setting down phone, taking deep breaths, │ | | going for a walk, establishing healthy boundaries │ | | │ | | ▼ | | [ Illuminating Cause / 了因 ] | | Direct Insight / Realization | | "I am not the anxiety; I am | | the awareness witnessing it." | | | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ```

Scenario 1: The Commute & Smartphone Overload

* The Scene: You are crammed into a crowded subway during peak morning commute. Your thumb rapidly scrolls through news feeds, social media notifications, and work chat alerts. You feel a sudden surge of tightness in your chest—a mixture of sensory overload, comparison fatigue, and ambient panic. * Mapping the Concept: * *Producing Cause (*shēngyīn* 生因):* The algorithmic notifications, sensory noise, mental projections, and your habitual narrative ("I am running out of time," "Everyone else is succeeding except me") are the *producing causes* that manufacture a new state of anxiety (*fánnǎo* 煩惱). * *The Common Error:* You think you need to *produce* peace by buying a new noise-canceling headphone set or aggressively forcing your mind to "think positive thoughts." This is trying to use another *producing cause* to fix a produced problem, leading to endless spiritual exhaustion. * *Illuminating Cause (*liǎoyīn* 了因):* Suddenly, you take a slow, deliberate breath. You pause your scrolling and simply observe the anxiety as a physical sensation in the chest. That moment of clear, non-judgmental mindfulness (*guānzhào* 觀照) is the illuminating cause. It does not construct a new "calm self"; it lights up the truth that your underlying capacity for basic awareness (*zhèngyīn* 正因) was never damaged by the subway noise or the algorithm. The peace was already there; the light of awareness simply made it apparent.

Scenario 2: Late-Night Overwork & "Imposter Syndrome"

* The Scene: It is 11:00 PM at your desk. You are revising a corporate presentation for the fourth time because a inner voice insists, "If this isn't perfect, they will realize I don't belong here." * Mapping the Concept: * *Producing Cause:* Your conditioned belief that your worth as a human being is strictly manufactured by your quarterly deliverables. * *The Common Error:* Believing that your sense of fundamental safety must be *produced* by external achievement. You treat confidence as a manufactured product of praise. * *Illuminating Cause:* You step away from the laptop, pour a glass of water, and ask: "Who is the one witnessing this fear of inadequacy?" The wisdom (*huì* 慧) that sees through the illusion of self-worth being tied to slides is the illuminating cause. It illumines the inherent, uncreated dignity (*Fóxìng* 佛性) that was present before you took this job and will remain after you leave it.

Scenario 3: Conflict in an Intimate Relationship

* The Scene: An argument erupts over household responsibilities. Words turn sharp. You feel a heavy wall rising between you and your partner. * Mapping the Concept: * *Producing Cause:* Defensive ego, old emotional wounds, and reactionary speech *produce* anger and distance. * *Illuminating Cause:* In the heat of the moment, a flash of insight arises: "This anger is not who I am, nor is it who my partner is. It is an impermanent reaction." This insight acts as the illuminating cause. It turns on the light in a dark room. The room's contents—the underlying goodwill, shared history, and mutual Buddha-nature—were obscured by emotional darkness. The illuminating cause doesn't fabricate love out of thin air; it reveals the ground of connection that was temporarily hidden.


Why Contemporary People Need the "Illuminating Cause"

Modern life is dominated almost entirely by a "producing mindset" (*shēngyīn xīn態*):

1. Freedom from "Self-Improvement" Exhaustion: Contemporary culture treats the human mind as a product to be optimized. We buy productivity tools, track our sleep stages with wearable tech, and attempt to *produce* happiness, self-worth, and enlightenment through sheer willpower. When we view spiritual life through a producing mindset, practice becomes just another high-pressure job. The concept of the illuminating cause gently releases this tension: Awakening is not a manufactured product. You do not need to assemble your true nature; you only need to light the lamp that reveals it. 2. A Counter-Weight to Performance Anxiety: When happiness is seen as something created by producing causes, it is fragile. If you produce it through success, a setback destroys it. But if true peace (*Níbián* 涅槃) is realized through an illuminating cause, it belongs to the realm of unconditioned reality. No market crash, career change, or physical aging can destroy what was never produced in the first place. 3. Analogous Comparison with Contemporary Science & Technology (and Its Limitations): * *Computational Analogy:* Consider an OLED display screen. A "producing cause" is like rendering millions of dynamic video frames across the screen—games, news, movies. The "illuminating cause" is like recognizing the underlying light-emitting capacity of the screen itself, which remains completely unstained whether it displays a tragedy or a comedy. * *Cognitive Science Parallel:* Modern neuroscience speaks of default mode network (DMN) down-regulation and the brain's capacity for metacognition (the ability to monitor one's own cognitive processes). Metacognitive awareness mirrors the function of an illuminating cause—it changes our relationship to thoughts without needing to manually manufacture new ones. * *Crucial Scientific Limitation:* Science views awareness as an emergent phenomenon *produced* by complex neural hardware (a classic producing cause model). Buddhism's concept of illuminating cause points to an unconditioned, non-fabricated reality (*fǎxìng* 法性 / *Fóxìng* 佛性) that transcends physical reductionism. Science investigates observable phenomena (*xīngxiāng* 性相); the illuminating cause points to the direct realization of the ultimate nature of mind itself.


Common Misconceptions & Clarifications (常见误读与澄清)

Misconception 1: "If everything is revealed by an illuminating cause, does that mean I should just sit passively and wait?"

Clarification: No. The *Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra* stresses that an illuminating cause requires auxiliary conditions (*yuányīn* 緣因), such as the Six Perfections, moral discipline, meditation, and study.

Think of a room filled with gold that has been locked in dark mud for centuries. The gold is indeed inherently there (*zhèngyīn* 正因). But if you do not actively pick up a shovel (auxiliary cause / *yuányīn* 緣因) and strike a match (illuminating cause / *liǎoyīn* 了因), you will starve in poverty despite sitting on top of a gold mine. Effort is required, but the *nature* of the effort changes from stressful manufacturing to disciplined clearing and illuminating.

``` +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | MISCONCEPTION VS. CANONICAL TRUTH | +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | MISCONCEPTION: | | "Awakening is already inside me, so I don't need to practice." | | | | CANONICAL REALITY: | | Gold in the ore (Direct Cause) + Digging/Washing (Auxiliary Cause) | | + Light of Wisdom (Illuminating Cause) = Usable Gold (Realization) | +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | MISCONCEPTION: | | "My practice creates/manufactures Buddha-Nature." | | | | CANONICAL REALITY: | | Practice removes darkness; Buddha-Nature is uncreated (Non-fabricated). | +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ```

Misconception 2: "Does 'inherent existence' mean everything in my life is predetermined?"

Clarification: The Buddha explicitly rejected fatalism and pre-determinism during his debate with Bodhisattva Lion's Roar.

The illuminating cause does *not* mean that specific daily events, personal choices, or future outcomes are pre-scripted like a movie. What is inherently present is the empty, luminous capacity for awakening (*Fóxìng* 佛性 / *Dìyīyì kōng* 第一義空)—not concrete material objects or fixed fates. The practice of the illuminating cause allows you to wake up *from* deterministic habits rather than being bound by them.

Misconception 3: "Is the Illuminating Cause just a fancy word for intellect or intellectual understanding?"

Clarification: Intellectual understanding (*fēnbié zhì* 分別智) is still a conditioned mental formation (*xíngyùn* 行蘊)—a producing cause that generates thoughts about Buddhism.

The true illuminating cause (*liǎoyīn* 了因) in Mahāyāna refers to non-conceptual, direct insight (*guānzhào bānruò* 觀照般若 / *chēnglǐ zhìhuì* 稱理智慧) that cuts through mental projections and directly shines upon reality as it is. Intellectual knowledge is like reading a instruction manual for a flashlight; the illuminating cause is turning the flashlight on.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

在《大般涅槃经》中,“了因”与“生因”相对,是佛教因果理论中的重要概念。其核心定义为:“能生法者,是名生因;燈能了物,故名了因”。生因是指能够产生、制造出新事物的因;而了因则如同黑暗中的灯光,其作用不在于创造新事物,而在于照亮、显现原本就存在的事物。 佛陀指出,佛性之所以是“是因非果”,正是因为它是“了因”。此外,涅槃的获得也是通过了因,而非生因。若是从生因得涅槃,则涅槃将会是“無常、無樂、無我、無淨”;而正是因为从了因得涅槃,所以涅槃是“常樂我淨”的。

二、 主要阐述

经中对了因与生因在世间法与修行觉悟中的具体配属进行了多重阐释: 1. 世间与烦恼配属:在世间与烦恼的层面,烦恼诸结为生因,而众生的父母则为了因;同样地,谷子等种子为生因,而地、水、粪等则为了因。 2. 修行与觉悟配属:在修行与觉悟的层面,六波罗蜜和阿耨多羅三藐三菩提可以作为生因,而佛性和阿耨多羅三藐三菩提则可作为了因;同时,六波罗蜜与佛性亦可作为了因;此外,八正道与阿耨多羅三藐三菩提同样作为了因。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《大般涅槃经》(北涼曇無讖譯)中,存在一些独特的译名与术语形式: 1. 五阴与五蕴:本经在论述中,以“五陰”来称呼通常所说的“五蕴”。 2. 阿耨多羅三藐三菩提:经中频繁使用“阿耨多羅三藐三菩提”这一音译来指代无上正等正觉。 3. 特定字形:在探讨因果与泥瓶的关系时,经文将“泥”写作“埿”(如“埿出瓶”)。

四、 与相关概念的关系

在经中,师子吼菩萨与佛陀展开了关于“了因”的辩论。师子吼菩萨试图将“了因”等同于“缘因”,并以此论证“乳中先有酪性”。他认为,泥中先有瓶、尼拘陀子中先有树,因此需要人、水、地、粪等作为“了因”来使其显现。 佛陀对此进行了反驳与澄清,厘清了了因与相关概念的关系: 1. 了因不能自了与了他:佛陀指出,若乳中定有酪性,则不需要了因。且了因作为一法,不能既“自了”又“了他”。 2. 修行非定有果之了因:若认为戒、定、智慧等修行是了因,且因中定有果,那么戒定慧就无法增益。事实上,众生本无戒定慧,是受教后才渐渐增长的。 3. 无性则无所了:若本无其性,了因也无所了。尼拘陀子中若本无树的粗相,即使有了因也无法生出树来。 4. 正因、缘因与了因的统一:最终,佛陀统一了因的分类,指出众生佛性有二因:正因(即众生或佛性)与缘因(即六波罗蜜或发菩提心),通过二因和合,最终得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 关于生因与了因的定义:“能生法者,是名生因;燈能了物,故名了因。” 2. 关于佛性与了因的关系:“佛性者,是因非果……一者生因,二者了因。” 3. 关于涅槃与了因的关系:“從了因得,故名常樂我淨;若從生因得,則無常、無樂、無我、無淨。” 4. 关于因中无果的辩论:“若乳中定有酪性,何須了因?……了因一法,不能自了,亦不能了他。” 5. 关于二因和合:“眾生佛性亦有二因:一者正因,二者緣因。以是二因,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。”

By SutraAI-generated

入中論善顯密意疏B0044 · 藏傳論典部

《入中論善顯密意疏》論「了因」,並非孤立宣說其正面定義,而是從能立之因與所了之宗兩端交涉處入手。疏中先以四句檢擇觀察因果關係:「為生已有之自性果,為生無果,為生亦有亦無之二俱果,為生非有非無之俱非果耶?」 此四句分別皆被遮破:生已有者成「生已復生」之過失,前已遮故;生無果者緣無所用,如兔角非有;後二句以有無俱非定非有故,緣亦無功用。

次以頌義攝其宗要:「因不生果則無果,離果則因應無因」。若因不生果即果無自性;然果之所以安立為果,正由因能生果之功能;若離果亦可安立因,則失安立因之因相,故此非彼所許;由此因果二法皆非有自性。

疏末將此因果無性之觀點,直接施於因明之「了因」「宗」之能立所立:頌曰「若能了因是實有,及所了宗有自性,則可配此合等理,非爾故汝唐劬勞」。意即唯有當能了因真實有、所了宗具自性時,方可配合同喻、異喻等因明比量之規矩以成立宗義;若了因不實、宗無自性,則所作推比徒勞無功。

綜觀本疏論「了因」之特色有三:一、不直顯其「顯發既有理性或果德」之正面定義,而以遮破「自性因不生果」之四句過失為先導,此即將外計自性因之執著予以瓦解。二、以「因待果、果待因」之互相待緣性,論證因果二者皆失自性,為下文施於因明軌則之破斥鋪墊。三、明示能立所作之因明論式,唯有在「了因實有」與「宗有自性」之前提下始能成立;一旦於無自性之前提下觀察,則了因所顯發之宗義與果德皆非實有,故作意比量之功用落空。

由此可記,本疏所謂「了因」之語義內涵,係指能顯示所立宗義之能立因分,與「宗」「果」「自性」等概念緊密相關;其特殊論述側面在於:以無自性理審視,將此因明術語回歸於自性有無之檢擇中考察,而非以正面定義之方式闡明;其用語沿用「了因」「宗」等標準因明名相,未見特殊替名。

大般涅槃經(北本)T0374 · 涅槃部

《大般涅槃經(北本)》對「了因」有相當詳備且多層次的論述,全經一律以「了因」為定稱,未見其他譯名替代。

一、了因與生因的二分架構

經文明確將「因」區分為兩類:「因有二種:一者生因,二者了因」。此一架構於全經反覆出現。生因為「能生法者」,了因則以「燈能了物,故名了因」為喻——燈不造作物體本身,而照顯已有之物。此一「不生而顯發」的特性,正契「顯發既有理性或果德之因」的概念內涵。

二、了因的具體例證

經文列舉多組配對實例以明二因之別:煩惱諸結是生因,眾生父母是了因;穀子等是生因,地水糞等是了因;六波羅蜜與阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之間,有時互為生因、有時互為了因;首楞嚴三昧是菩提之生因,八正道是菩提之了因;信心是六波羅蜜之生因。其後又以尼拘陀子(樹種)為例,說明「以地、水、糞作了因故,令細得麁」——子中本具樹相,然須了因之力方得顯發。

三、了因=緣因的等同性

師子吼菩薩明確提出「緣因者即是了因」,並舉闇中諸物須燈照了、泥中瓶須人水輪繩杖為了因、尼拘陀子須地水糞為了因等例。此觀點後為佛陀認可,並進一步整合為:「正因者名為佛性,緣因者發菩提心。以二因緣,得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提,如石出金」。亦即:正因(佛性)為所依之理性,緣因(了因)為顯發此理性之力用,二者相即。

四、了因與果德性質的對應

在與婆羅門闍提首那的對論中,經文對二因所獲果德作出明確區分:婆羅門先自陳「一者生因、二者了因」,並以「生因者如埿出瓶,了因者如燈照物」為喻;佛陀隨即開顯:「從了因得故,常樂我淨。從生因得故,無常、無樂、無我、無淨。」此一對應關係凸顯了因——於涅槃四德之建立尤為關鍵:了因不產生新法,而是顯發本有之常樂我淨。

五、了因自身能否自了之辨析

師子吼曾以「自了、了他」之義難為了因之自性,佛陀回以「了因一法,云何有二」加以破斥,顯示此經對了因概念的論理嚴密性——了因不具能所二分之自性相,故不能自了,必須依智慧之性方能照顯他法。

術語記錄

此經一律使用「了因」,未見「達因」「顯因」「照因」等其他譯名。與之對舉者為「生因」;在另一層次上,「緣因」被等同於「了因」,「正因」則指佛性本體,三組術語構成完整的二因體系。

大般涅槃經(南本)T0375 · 涅槃部

本經論「了因」,主要以「二因對舉」的架構展開,並以「燈照闇物」之譬喻貫穿全經。

一、「了因」之定義與譬喻 本經明示:「因有二種:一者、生因,二者、了因。能生法者,是名生因;燈能了物,故名了因」。其喻反覆以燈、燭為例:「如燈、燭等照闇中物,是名了因」;「譬如闇中先有諸物,為欲見故,以燈照了」。此喻意在表明:所了之物本已先有,燈不造物而令物顯現,是「了」而非「生」。

二、「了因」與「作因」、「生因」之嚴別 佛先以五因(生因、和合因、住因、增長因、遠因)破執,繼而開「二因」之說:「復有二因:一者、作因,二者、了因。如陶師輪繩,是名作因;如燈、燭等照闇中物,是名了因」,並特別強調「善男子!大涅槃者不從作因而有,唯從了因」。面對婆羅門「因性是一」之問,經中釐清功能之別:「若使生因不作了因、了因不作生因,可得說言是因相不?」

三、涅槃之因唯是「了因」,非「生因」 本經載:「善男子!如世間法,或說生因、或說了因;出世之法亦復如是……三解脫門、三十七品能為一切煩惱作不生生因,亦為涅槃而作了因」「是故涅槃唯有了因,無有生因」。涅槃法體不從五因所成,故言「涅槃之體非是如是五因所成,云何當言是無常因」。又明判其所得:「我法雖從無常獲得涅槃而非無常……從了因得故,常、樂、我、淨;從生因得故,無常、無樂、無我、無淨」。

四、「了因」之具體內涵 本經列舉其法門:「了因者,所謂三十七助道法、六波羅蜜,是名了因」。又指:「近因者,即是三解脫門;遠因者,即無量世所修善法」;「無漏正道能為一切眾生佛性而作了因,不作生因,猶如明燈照了於物」。

五、「了因」與「緣因」、「正因」之關聯 師子吼問中提及:「緣因者,即是了因」,以乳中先有酪性為例,「雖先有性,要假了因然後得見」,顯示「正因」(本性先有)必須待「緣因」(即了因)方得顯了。

六、「了因」對應佛性之各面 經又云:「煩惱諸結是名生因;眾生父母是名了因」;並交互列舉:「復有了因,謂六波羅蜜佛性」「復有生因,謂首楞嚴三昧、阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」「復有了因,謂八正道、阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」,呈現「了因」可隨所顯之法而異其名目。

Related