Dharma · AI Companion

自在

vaśitā

不受障碍而能任运自主。AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

Here is a deep dive into the Buddhist concept of Ease and Mastery (*Zìzài* 自在 / Sanskrit: *vaśitā*).


What This Concept Is Actually Saying

In contemporary parlance, the word *Zìzài* (自在) is often diluted into a vague, romanticized state of feeling relaxed, living casually, or "just being oneself." In classical Buddhist text, however, *Zìzài*—translating the Sanskrit term vaśitā—refers to a precise, robust state of existential sovereignty and unhindered mastery. It describes a mind, a level of meditative absorption (*dhyāna*), a range of spiritual powers (*ṛddhi*), and a final liberation (*mokṣa*) that is totally unconditioned, unconfined, and unmoved by mental afflictions (*kleśa*) or external environments.

To understand *Zìzài* within the overall Path of Liberation (解脫道, *mokṣa-mārga*), we must examine its distinct layers across the textual traditions, from early Agama discourses to Mahayana Bodhisattva literature:

1. Liberation and Meditative Mastery (*Dhyāna* & *Nirvāṇa*)

*Zìzài* is the absolute freedom of the mind that has severed all unwholesome states. In the *Madhyama Āgama* (*Zhong Ahan Jing* 中阿含經), this is described vividly: a practitioner breaking through mental hindrances is like a "bird breaking through a net and flying freely" (*T0026*). Furthermore, true liberation is not a state realized only while sitting silently in a cave; it permeates all bodily postures—walking, standing, sitting, and lying down (*zìzài xíng, zìzài zhù, zìzài zuò, zìzài wò* 自在行、自在住、自在坐、自在臥). This physical and mental unhinderedness across all four postures is explicitly equated with "Liberation without Remainder" (*wúyú jiětuō* 無餘解脫) and "Unsurpassed Ultimate Peace/Nirvāṇa" (*wúbìng wúshàng ānyǐn nièpán* 無病無上安隱涅槃). It also means reaching the state of "not following the mastery of Māra" (*bù suí mó zìzài* 不隨魔自在)—no longer being pulled by mental afflictions or external distractions.

2. Transcending Desire, Gain, and Loss

In the *Samyukta Āgama* (*Za Ahan Jing* 雜阿含經), the Buddha addresses the human obsession with gain and loss. If a mind calculates profit and loss (*xīn jì yú déshī* 心計於得失), that mind is inherently enslaved (*qí xīn bù zìzài* 其心不自在). True *Zìzài* means: *"Whether lost or regained, my mind remains undisturbed"*. Crucially, the scriptures dismantle the worldly myth of pleasure. Worldly mindsets define "Great Powerful Joy of Mastery" (*dàlì zìzài lè* 大力自在樂) as "obtaining whatever one seeks" (*suǒ qiú wú bù dé* 所求無不得). The Buddha corrects this: **The true Great Powerful Joy of Mastery is actually "having no cravings/seeking" (*wú suǒ qiú* 無所求)**. Seeking itself is inherently bound up with suffering; only when one transcends the itch of seeking is true, unshakeable mastery attained.

3. The Dialectic of Householders vs. Renunciants

The *Madhyama Āgama* outlines a striking inverted dialectic regarding what constitutes joy (*lè* 樂) and suffering (*kǔ* 苦) through *Zìzài*: * For the Householder (Secular Life): They view the accumulation and growth of wealth, status, and possessions as "Joy in Mastery" (*yǐ zìzài wéi lè* 以自在為樂), and the stagnation or loss of wealth as "Suffering in Lack of Mastery" (*yǐ bù zìzài wéi kǔ* 以不自在為苦). * For the Renunciant (Path of Practice): This logic is entirely reversed. If a practitioner follows their own personal whims, anger, and ignorance (*xíng suí qí yù, xíng suí huì, chī* 行隨其欲,行隨恚、癡), this indulge-yourself "freedom" actually produces sorrow and mental bondage; this is called **"Suffering in (Indulgent) Mastery" (*yǐ zìzài wéi kǔ*)**. Conversely, when a practitioner restrains their desires and does not indulge in anger or delusion (*xíng bù suí yù, xíng bù suí huì, chī* 行不隨欲,行不隨恚、癡), this self-discipline—which looks like "lack of personal freedom" to outsiders—is the real source of unshakeable joy: **"Joy in Non-Indulgence/Restraint" (*yǐ bù zìzài wéi lè*)**.

4. Bodhisattva & Tathāgata Ultimate Mastery

In Mahayana scriptures like the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*Dà Bǎojī Jīng* 大寶積經), *Zìzài* expands from an individual’s internal liberation into compassionate, transcendent responsiveness: * **The Five Masteries (*Wǔzhǒng Zìzài* 五種自在):** Gained via deep meditative absorption (*Samādhi* 三昧), a Bodhisattva achieves mastery over: 1. *Lifespan* (*shòumìng zìzài* 壽命自在): Control over life duration for the sake of teaching. 2. *Rebirth* (*shēng zìzài* 生自在): Choosing where and how to manifest. 3. *Karma* (*yè zìzài* 業自在): Unbound by karmic momentum while acting in the world. 4. *Discursive Thought/Volition* (*juéguān zìzài* 覺觀自在): Complete control over thoughts and mental focus. 5. *Requisites and Material Fruits* (*zhòngjù guǒbào zìzài* 眾具果報自在): The effortless manifestation of resources needed to alleviate suffering. * **Mastery of Un-arising (*Bùshēng Zìzài* 不生自在): The Bodhisattva remains in the world without being tainted by worldliness—refusing to enter final Nirvāṇa prematurely purely out of vow-driven compassion for sentient beings. They achieve Mastery of Body and Speech** (*shēn kǒu zìzài* 身口自在) to adapt their forms and expressions seamlessly to reach any audience.


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life

To see how *Zìzài* functions versus where we get it wrong, let us run a modern individual through a typical workday:

Scenario A: The Notification Trajectory (Contrasting *Sìyù* 肆慾 vs. *Bù suí mó zìzài* 不隨魔自在)

* The Reality: You sit down at your desk to focus on an important report. A phone screen lights up with a social media notification or a sensational news ping. Your hand reflexively reaches for the device, spends 40 minutes doom-scrolling, and leaves you feeling drained, anxious, and behind schedule. * The Common Misconception: People often think, *"I picked up my phone because I felt like it. Doing whatever I want is freedom/Zìzài."* * The Classical Buddhist Critique: This is precisely what the *Madhyama Āgama* terms **"Suffering in Indulgent Mastery" (*yǐ zìzài wéi kǔ*)**. You didn't exercise freedom; you succumbed to compulsive mental habit-loops (*kleśa* / Māra's pull). When you "follow your whims" (*xíng suí qí yù* 行隨其欲), you become a passive puppet to neurochemical reward loops. * **The Real *Zìzài* Moment:** True *Zìzài* is the capacity to notice the impulse, remain unswayed, and put the phone back down. In classical terms, exercising discipline over impulsive desires (*xíng bù suí yù* 行不隨欲) is the gateway to **"Joy in Self-Restraint" (*yǐ bù zìzài wéi lè*)**—granting you the genuine freedom to keep your mental energy centered where you choose.

Scenario B: The Performance Review (Contrasting *Jì yú déshī* 計於得失 vs. *Wú suǒ qiú* 無所求)

* The Reality: During a corporate restructuring or quarterly review, news arrives that your project did not get the budget allocation you hoped for, or a colleague received a promotion you wanted. * The Entrapment: Your mind loops endlessly: *"Why them and not me? What does this mean for my status?"* This state of calculating gain and loss (*xīn jì yú déshī* 心計於得失) leaves the mind utterly un-free (*qí xīn bù zìzài* 其心不自在). * **The Classical *Zìzài* Response:** *Zìzài* does not mean being passive or unmotivated. It means performing actions with excellence while maintaining zero psychological addiction to the outcome: *"Whether lost or regained, my mind remains undisturbed"* (*ruò shī ruò fù dé, yú wǒ xīn bù luàn* 若失若復得,於我心不亂). When you stop equating your self-worth with external validation, you discover the **"Great Powerful Joy of Having Nothing to Crave" (*dàlì zìzài lè, wéi yǒu wú suǒ qiú* 大力自在樂,唯有無所求)**.

Scenario C: Safe Boundaries vs. Overreaching (The Quail Analogy)

* The Reality: A professional tries to master five totally unrelated fields at once, or gets drawn into toxic workplace gossip outside their responsibilities, feeling utterly overwhelmed. * The Analogy: The *Samyukta Āgama* uses the fable of the Quail (*Luóbā niǎo* 羅婆鳥). When the quail stays within its home territory—the safety of the plowed furrow—it easily outsmarts the hunting falcon. But when it wanders off into unfamiliar, open ground, it gets captured by the falcon and laments its loss of *Zìzài*. * The Takeaway: *Zìzài* requires knowing one's grounded domain (*tián gēng lǒng zhōng* 田耕壠中)—anchoring yourself in mindfulness, ethical boundaries, and present awareness—rather than letting your attention wander unprotected into hostile environments.


Why Modern People Need It Desperately

In the contemporary world, we live in an era of hyper-engineered craving. Algorithms, targeted advertising, and notification systems are explicitly built to trigger dopamine hits, capturing human attention and turning impulse into habit.

1. The Fallacy of "Choice-Abundance": Modern society equates "freedom" with having limitless choices—what restaurant to order from, what video to stream, what opinion to post. Yet, never have people felt more exhausted, anxious, and helplessly reactive. Buddhism points out that endless external choices without internal mental sovereignty is simply an illusion of choice inside a golden cage. 2. The Tyranny of Status and Power: The scripture notes how ancient kings sat on thrones crying out, *"Sitting on this throne, I no longer have any true freedom (*bù fù dé zìzài* 不複得自在)!"* while someone holding half an amla fruit in their hand could experience true internal autonomy (*yúshì dé zìyóu* 於是得自由). Today’s hyper-connected, high-pressure environments reproduce this exact dynamic: the more external power or digital footprint one accumulates, the more enslaved one often becomes to public opinion, market fluctuations, and endless maintenance.

*Zìzài* offers contemporary people a radically different definition of agency: Sovereignty is not the power to dominate the external world or indulge every desire; sovereignty is the unshakeable capacity of the mind to remain clear, free, and unenslaved by its own reactions.


Common Misconceptions and Clarifications

1. Misconception: "*Zìzài* means doing whatever I feel like doing."

* Clarification: Following every impulse is not freedom; it is mechanical reactivity. Buddhism terms this "following desire and ill-will" (*xíng suí qí yù, huì, chī* 行隨其欲、恚、癡), which leads directly to mental bondage and distress (*yǐ zìzài wéi kǔ* 以自在為樂/苦). True *Zìzài* is the ability not to be pulled around by your reactive impulses (*bù suí mó zìzài* 不隨魔自在).

2. Misconception: "*Zìzài* means total detachment to the point of being cold, passive, or indifferent."

* Clarification: While *Zìzài* transcends selfish craving (*wú suǒ qiú* 無所求), in the Mahayana tradition it culminates in dynamic, active compassion. The Bodhisattva’s "Mastery of Un-arising" (*bùshēng zìzài* 不生自在) explicitly involves not abandoning sentient beings (*bù fàng shě yīqiè zhòngshēng* 不放捨一切眾生) and intentionally delaying entry into static Nirvāṇa to assist others (*wèi zhòngshēng gù bù rù nièpán* 為眾生故不入涅槃). It is unhindered engagement, not cold withdrawal.

3. Misconception: "Does modern Neuroscience prove *Zìzài*?"

* Clarification: Modern cognitive neuroscience and behavioral psychology study mechanisms like executive control, neuroplasticity, and default mode network (DMN) down-regulation during meditation. While these scientific models provide fascinating parallels for how mindfulness reduces automatic reactivity, **science does not "prove" or fully encompass *Zìzài*.** Empirical science operates strictly within quantifiable, third-person physical measurements. *Zìzài* in Buddhism includes existential, ethical, and metaphysical dimensions—such as the total eradication of subtle delusion (*avidyā*), complete karmic liberation, and transcendent meditative realization—that lie beyond empirical measurement. Cognitive science remains an insightful tool for observing brain states, but *Zìzài* is a transformative state of existential liberation.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义 「自在」(vaśitā)在佛教经典中指修行者、菩萨及如来在心灵、禅定、神通与解脱中所展现的通达无碍、不受束缚、不随烦恼与外境所动的主宰状态。它既是断尽恶法后的终极解脱境界,也是菩萨度化众生时所展现的无碍能力。

二、 主要阐述 1. 禅定与解脱之自在:在修行实践中,「自在」是禅定成就与涅槃解脱的直接体现。修行者借由禅定的力量,能如「鸟破网出」般「得禅自在游」。当修行者断尽一切恶不善法,便能在行、住、坐、卧等一切威仪中通达无碍,即「自在行、自在住、自在坐、自在卧」,此状态被等同于「无余解脱」与「无病无上安隐涅槃」。此外,解脱之自在还表现为不被魔罗(烦恼或外在干扰)所控制,修行者通过防护与不放逸,达到「不随魔自在」的境界,最终证得涅槃。 2. 心理、欲望与得失的超越:若心念计较于利益的得失,则「其心不自在」;若能做到「若失若复得,于我心不乱」,便能保持心灵的自在。世俗常将满足一切欲望的「所求无不得」视为「大力自在乐」,但经中纠正指出,真正的「大力自在乐」实际上是「无所求」,因为有求皆是苦,唯有超越追求才能获得真正的自在。 3. 在家与出家的辩证定义:对于「自在」与「不自在」的苦乐属性,在家者与出家修行者有着相反的定义。在家者以物质财富的增长为「以自在为乐」,以财物不增长为「以不自在为苦」。相反,出家者若顺从自身的欲望、瞋恚与愚痴(「行随其欲,行随恚、痴」),反而会带来忧苦,这被称为「以自在为苦」;而出家者克制、不放纵烦恼(「行不随欲,行不随恚、痴」),才是快乐的源泉,被称为「以不自在为乐」。 4. 菩萨与如来的究竟自在:如来得「三昧自在」与「最胜自在」,知见无碍,身心诸根无有增减,被尊称为「大雄解自在」。菩萨则通过断诸戏论、心善解脱,成就「不生自在」,其行相表现为不与结使烦恼同住、不味禅乐、降伏魔业、不为世法所污、为众生故不入涅槃等。此外,菩萨因成就「一切法乐善取三昧」而获得「五种自在」(寿命、生、业、觉观、众具果报自在);并能以神足行成就「身口自在」(随类现形)、「于法而得自在」(随俗变化、无碍说法)以及「建立其心使得由已」之自在。 5. 处境安全与世俗权力的对比:如罗婆鸟之喻所示,个体必须在安全、合适的自身境界(「田耕垅中」)活动才能「得自在」,若偏离正确范畴则会「不得自在」而受制于外敌。同时,世俗的权位与富贵往往是心灵的束缚,如君王感叹「我今坐王位,不复得自在」;相反,对微小财物的自主(如手握半个阿摩勒果)却能让人「于是得自由」。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异 1. 《中阿含经》的表述特征:该经偏重于禅定威仪与戒律实践,使用「得禅自在游」与「自在行、自在住、自在坐、自在卧」来具体化解脱状态。同时,该经独特地采用了「以自在为乐/苦」与「以不自在为乐/苦」的对比,来界定在家与出家修行者在对待欲望时的相反态度。 2. 《杂阿含经》的表述特征:该经的表述更具世俗与心理色彩。它提及世俗对造物主的妄执为「大梵自在」;将修行防护表述为「不随魔自在」;将超越欲望的快乐表述为「大力自在乐」。特别的是,该经在同一偈颂中同时使用了「自在」与「自由」两个术语,以「不复得自在」对比「于是得自由」,用以说明世俗权位与个体自主的差别。 3. 《大宝积经》的表述特征:该经发展出高度系统化的菩萨与如来境界术语。如来境界被表述为「三昧自在」、「最胜自在」与「大雄解自在」。菩萨修行境界则有「不生自在」;因三昧而得的「五种自在」(寿命自在、生自在、业自在、觉观自在、众具果报自在);以及神足行中的「身口自在」、「于法而得自在」与「建立其心使得由已」之自在。

四、 与相关概念的关系 1. 与「禅定」与「涅槃」:自在是禅定成就与涅槃解脱的直接体现。如「得禅自在游」与四威仪自在即是「无余解脱」与「无病无上安隐涅槃」;如来亦是得「三昧自在」到于彼岸。 2. 与「魔」:自在意味着摆脱魔的控制。修行者通过防护与不放逸达到「不随魔自在」;菩萨的「不生自在」亦包含「降伏魔业」,且不为众魔所动坏。 3. 与「自由」:在《杂阿含经》中,「自在」与「自由」形成对比。身处王位者「不复得自在」,而拥有微小自物者却能「于是得自由」,显示出「自由」在此处更偏向于免受世俗权位束缚的个体自主。 4. 与「大梵天」:世俗众生将大梵天视为具有主宰、造作能力的「大梵自在」,而佛法对此进行诘问,将其视为一种妄执,与佛法内心无求、无碍的真正自在有本质区别。

五、 代表性原文引用 1. 《中阿含经》:「得禅自在游,如鸟破网出。」;「自在行、自在住、自在坐、自在卧……是谓无余解脱……无病无上安隐涅槃。」;出家者「行随其欲,行随恚、痴,是谓以自在为苦……行不随欲,行不随恚、痴,是谓以不自在为乐。」 2. 《杂阿含经》:众生言:「此大梵自在,造作自然,为众生父。」;罗婆鸟言:「我于父母境界田耕垅中得自在。」;君王言:「我今坐王位,不复得自在……于是得自由。」;「心计于得失,其心不自在……若失若复得,于我心不乱。」;「时得不放逸,不随魔自在……得涅槃。」;「大力自在乐,非谓多欲求……大力自在乐,唯有无所求。」 3. 《大宝积经》:如来「得三昧自在到于彼岸,于一切法得最胜自在。」;「大雄解自在,知法中无事,无缚亦无解。」;菩萨「不生自在……不共嫉妒、犯戒、无明瞋恚、痴、瞋恼诤讼等结使与烦恼同住……于诸圣中得名自在。」;「五种自在:一者寿命自在,二者生自在,三者业自在,四者觉观自在,五者众具果报自在。」;菩萨神足行成就「身口自在」、「于法而得自在」与「建立其心使得由已」之自在。

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

本經《中阿含經》以生聞梵志與世尊的問答形式,圍繞「自在」與「不自在」展開論述,呈現出獨特的對比結構與世間意涵。

一、核心表述:以自在、不自在為苦樂之因

世尊開宗明義指出,在家者「以不自在為苦」,而出家學道者「以自在為苦」;在家者「以自在為樂」,而出家學道者「以不自在為樂」。本經將「自在」與「不自在」直接作為苦、樂生起的因緣來陳述,形成一組顛倒常人認知的判斷。

二、獨特側面:自在的世俗意涵

本經對「自在」的闡釋別具世俗取向,分就兩種身分界定:

(一)在家之自在,專指錢財、穀米、奴婢等物質資具的任運增長。世尊言:若在家者錢得增長,金、銀、真珠、琉璃、水精皆得增長,畜牧、穀米及奴婢使亦得增長,爾時在家快樂歡喜;若資具不增長,則憂苦愁慼。故在家之自在,乃資生物質層面的豐足無缺。

(二)出家之自在,則指行隨其欲、行隨恚、癡,即隨順欲、恚、癡而任意縱行、不加制抑。世尊判此種自在為苦,因為隨欲、恚、癡而行者憂苦愁慼。反之,出家學道者行不隨欲、不隨恚、癡,於欲、恚、癡不隨轉時,即得快樂歡喜,是為「以不自在為樂」。

三、術語形式

本經所用核心術語即「自在」與「不自在」二詞,未使用其他異名或同義替換。其固定句式為「以自在為苦/樂」與「以不自在為苦/樂」,以「以……為……」的結構將自在與苦樂直接連繫為因果。

四、對照性結構的翻轉意義

全段以「在家/出家」、「苦/樂」、「自在/不自在」三組對比反覆辯證,揭示同一「自在」之名在不同身分處境中價值指向截然相反:在家以物資豐衍為自在而得快樂,此自在之樂繫於物資之增減;出家以欲、恚、癡得縱行為自在而反招憂苦。本經以此打破對「自在」一詞的單一嚮往,顯示其詞雖同,而內涵隨身分與所緣而有天壤之別。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》中論及「自在」一詞,貫穿多處經文,呈現出多層次的意涵。所採用的術語即為「自在」二字,未見其他異譯名稱。

首先,經中以「大梵自在」之名破斥外道邪見。佛陀質問比丘:「何所有故,何所起?何所繫著,何所見我,令諸眾生作如是見、如是說:『此大梵自在,造作自然,為眾生父』?」此處的「自在」是外道所執以為宇宙主宰之神性,其意為自然而有、造作一切之自在主。經中以此為眾生錯見所繫著之處,揭示執此為真我之過失。

其次,「自在」亦出現於羅婆鳥與鷹的譬喻中。羅婆鳥為鷹所捉,於虛空中哀鳴云:「如何今日為他所困,不得自在。」鷹問:「汝當何處自有境界而得自在?」羅婆答言:「我於田耕壠中自有境界,足免諸難,是為我家父母境界。」此處「自在」與「境界」並提,意指各各有其本分活動之範域,能於其內免於逼惱、任運無礙,即為自在。

再者,經中以偈頌展示「自在」與外在境遇之關係。偈云:「汝等護我心,何假虛妄語,我今坐王位,不復得自在。阿摩勒半果,今在於我手,此即是我物,於是得自由。」坐於王位卻「不復得自在」,反觀手執半果之微物即得「自由」,顯示「自在」非繫於尊位富貴,而在於實際擁有可自主之物,繼之又以恒河駛流喻富貴逝者不還,點示自在之難久。

又有一偈揭示心境之「自在」:「若失若復得,於我心不亂。婆羅門當知,莫謂彼如我,心計於得失,其心不自在。」若人於得失之間計較籌量,則其心「不自在」;反之,得失不亂、其心寂然,方為心之自在。

此外,經中亦以「大力自在樂,所求無不得」形容一種具大威力、無求不獲之境界。此「自在」與「大力」「樂」並舉,呈現一種圓滿無缺的福樂狀態。

綜觀上述,《雜阿含經》中之「自在」並非單一義涵:既指外道所執之造物主(為破斥之對象),亦指有情於自身境界中之任運無礙;既關乎外在擁有之物能否自主,亦關乎內心對得失是否擾亂;又指具大威力、所欲無缺之圓滿福樂。經中各處隨機設教,從不同側面闡發此詞之意趣。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》論「自在」一詞,散見於以下兩處內文,其內涵可歸納為兩類:

一、一般行為意義之自在 本經以「自在」表述行為主體依自身業力而自主活動之義。原文云:「我終無此心,使彼在他方,彼自當造行,便自在他所。」此中「自在」指人依自身所造之業行,而於其所處之地得自主任運,不受他人外力之拘繫。此為世間法層面之自在,含自作自受、自主活動之義,顯示本經亦將「自在」用於描述凡夫依業自處之狀態。

二、禪定神通意義之自在 本經最詳之「自在」論述,出於舍利弗與目連神足優劣之公案。佛對目連說明:目連非神足退失,而是舍利弗所入之神足三昧之法目連所不解;「舍利弗比丘智慧無有量,心得自在」,「舍利弗心神足得自在」,「若舍利弗比丘心所念法,即得自在」。此處「自在」乃心深入三昧後之圓滿境界——心若得自在,則所念即得自在,神足亦隨心得自在。此中「自在」與神足、三昧並舉,顯示其為禪定神通中之高階成就,須以三昧為所依方能證得。

就術語形式而言,本經直接使用「自在」二字,未以其他異名替代。搭配形式有「心得自在」、「心神足得自在」、「心所念法,即得自在」三種,皆以「心」為主語或所依,強調自在以心為根本。此點值得留意:本經並未如部分經典以「如意」、「無礙」等詞替代「自在」,始終保持「自在」一詞之使用。

本經論「自在」之獨特側面,在於以「心—神足—三昧」三層關係凸顯自在之深淺差別:目連雖被佛授記為「聲聞中神足第一」,然其於三昧之自在不及舍利弗;舍利弗之勝處不在神通表相,而在於心深入三昧後之根本自在——「心所念法,即得自在」。此即本經判釋弟子神足優劣之內在標準,亦為本經對「自在」一詞最具體之詮釋:自在不等於神通之展現,而為心於三昧中之究竟解脫。

又此公案中,阿耨達龍王因見舍利弗神力而「歡喜踊躍,不能自勝」,雖語涉喜悅失態之凡夫情狀,但亦從側面顯示:本經以「得自在」對應修行成就之圓滿,以「不能自勝」對應凡夫情識之難制,二者形成鮮明對比,凸顯「自在」於本經中具備出世間之義涵。

整體而言,《增壹阿含經》論「自在」以「心得自在」為核心表述,以三昧為所依,強調心之自在為神通自在之根本,此為本經對「自在」一詞之主要詮釋方向。

Related