Dharma · AI Companion

自在轉

vaśitā-pravṛtti

由转依圆满,于一切法或一切相得自主无碍运转之能。AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span III · nominal designation ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

第三重转依圆满立自在运转之能,究竟即法身离言

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

这个概念在说什么 (What This Concept Is Saying)

In Buddhist soteriology, liberation is often misunderstood as a passive state of cessation—a quiet room where nothing happens. However, the Mahāyāna tradition presents a far more vibrant vision of awakening: the ability to act, create, and respond seamlessly within the world without ever being entangled by it. This dynamic capacity is captured by the term 自在轉 (*zìzài zhuǎn*, Autonomous Operation / Freedom in Motion).

To understand *Zizai Zhuan*, we must break down its two constituent terms according to classical treatises such as the *Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra* (《大乘莊嚴經論》) and Nirviśeṣa’s commentary on the *Mahāyānasaṃgraha* (《攝大乘論釋(無性釋)》):

1. **自在 (*zìzài*, Vaśitā / Autonomous Mastery):** The *Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra* defines *Zizai* succinctly: 「隨自意轉,自然不行諸境界」 (“Operating according to one’s true intent, naturally not roaming among or clinging to external objects/realms”). *Zizai* is not merely the absence of coercion; it is profound spiritual autonomy. When consciousness no longer fixates on external appearances (*xiàng*, 相), it ceases to be bound by them. The scripture states: *"If there are appearances, there is bondage; if there is bondage, there is no liberation. Not roaming among any realms is liberation."*

2. **轉 (*zhuǎn*, Pravṛtti / Dynamic Operation):** *Zhuan* does not mean mere physical change or external mutation. It denotes the unhindered, spontaneous manifestation of enlightened virtues and actions triggered instantly upon intention (*yùlè*, 欲樂 / aspired delight). It is the power of wisdom to operate fluidly within the empirical world.

Together, 自在轉 (*zìzài zhuǎn*) refers to the supreme capacity—achieved by Buddhas and advanced Bodhisattvas—to autonomously and unobstructedly operate, manifest, and work for the benefit of sentient beings across all phenomena, grounded in ultimate liberation.

1. The Foundation: Perfection of Transformation of the Basis (轉依圓滿)

*Zizai Zhuan* does not appear out of thin air. Its ultimate prerequisite is 轉依 (*zhuǎnyī*, *āśraya-parāvṛtti* / Transformation of the Basis). In Yogācāra philosophy, our baseline consciousness (*ālaya-vijñāna*) is loaded with subtle cognitive inversions (*tiāndǎo*, 顛倒) and defiled seeds. "Transformation of the Basis" means uprooting these deluded seeds so that false appearances no longer manifest, leaving only ultimate, pure Reality (*tathatā* / 真如).

The *Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra* explains the ontological secret behind this: 「迷因無體故,無迷自在行;倒因無體故,無倒自在轉。」 (“Because the cause of delusion has no inherent substance, there is autonomous action without delusion; because the cause of inversion has no inherent substance, there is autonomous operation without inversion.”) Because confusion and misperception never had real, permanent substance (*wútǐ*, 無體) in the first place, once they are recognized as empty, spiritual autonomy (*zìzài*) naturally establishes itself.

2. The Fourfold Masteries (四種自在)

How does this freedom manifest in practice? The *Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra* explains that by transforming three fundamental functions of the mind— (intent/mind), (sensation/feeling), and 分別 (conceptual discrimination)—a practitioner fulfills 四種自在 (Fourfold Masteries): * 無分別自在 (Mastery of Non-conceptual Wisdom): Freedom from dualistic, rigid conceptual traps. * 剎土自在 (Mastery of Pure Lands/Realms): Freedom to shape and purify environments for spiritual practice. * 智自在 (Mastery of Wisdom): Unobstructed access to all modes of knowledge and teaching methods. * 業自在 (Mastery of Enlightened Activity): Effortless, unhindered action in serving sentient beings.

3. The Ultimate Paradox and Its Limit

The true hallmark of *Zizai Zhuan* is expressed in a famous line from the *Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra*: 「處處方便起,不動真法界」 (“Arising in all contexts through skillful means, while remaining entirely unmoved in the true Dharma-realm”). A Bodhisattva can manifest countlessly across the realms of birth and death to help others, yet their mind never steps outside ultimate truth.

However, the texts make a vital distinction regarding the boundaries of this mastery. In the *Mahāyānasaṃgraha-bhāṣya*, Nirviśeṣa emphasizes a striking principle: 「諸佛無自在」 (“Buddhas have non-mastery” over certain conditions).

Why would an omniscient Buddha lack mastery? Because enlightenment respects the law of cause and effect (karma). A Buddha cannot forcibly liberate a sentient being who possesses heavy karmic obstructions (煩惱障, 業障, 異熟障), lacks the spiritual potential for Nirvana (無種性), or is under the absolute momentum of fixed karma (作重業決定 / determination of heavy karma and 受異熟決定 / determination of karmic fruition). *Zizai Zhuan* means absolute inner mastery and unhindered responsiveness, not magic omnipotence that violates the moral order of individual agency.


生活里的走查 (Walkthrough in Daily Life)

To bring *Zizai Zhuan* down from abstract metaphysics into concrete experience, let us trace how our everyday mind operates versus how a mind trained in *Zizai Zhuan* operates across three modern scenarios.

``` [External Realm / Signal] ──> [Sensation & Conceptualization] ──> [Reaction / Entanglement or Mastery] │ ┌──────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────┐ ▼ ▼ Ordinary State: 被縛 (Bound) 自在轉 (Autonomous Operation) • Clinging to appearances (行諸境界) • Naturally unattached (自然不行諸境界) • Reactive emotional narrative • Transmuted mind/feeling (意受分別轉) • Caught in cause-and-effect illusion • Responsive yet unmoved (不動真法界) ```

Scenario 1: The Smartphone Feed & Algorithmic Traps (Attention & Realm)

* The Ordinary Experience: A push notification flashes on your phone screen—a sensational headline or a ping from a social app. Instantly, your attention is hijacked. The mind instantly engages with the image (*xiàng*, 相), generating anxiety, outrage, or curiosity. You spend the next two hours doomscrolling. * *The Canonical Diagnosis:* This is 「行諸境界」 (roaming among and clinging to realms) and being bound (「若有相則被縛」). The mind is reactive, driven by external algorithmic conditioning. * **Mapping *Zizai Zhuan*:** * Wrong Mapping: Believing *Zizai Zhuan* means having the willpower to stare at a phone for 12 hours without blinking, or magically controlling what news gets posted online. * Correct Mapping: The notification flashes (*a realm appears*). The mind recognizes the appearance, but because of inner clarity, it naturally refrains from getting pulled into the emotional narrative—「自然不行諸境界」. You swipe the notification away or answer it deliberately if needed, returning instantly to presence. The mind operates autonomously according to intention (*suí zì yì zhuǎn*), rather than being operated upon by the screen.

Scenario 2: Workplace Criticism & High-Stress Demands (Sensation & Feeling)

* The Ordinary Experience: During a meeting, your boss harshly criticizes your project. A surge of unpleasant feeling (, *vedanā*) arises. Your mind instantly turns this sensation into a dramatic mental story (分別, *vikalpa*): *"I am a failure,"* or *"They are out to destroy me."* You either freeze in shame or lash out defensively. * *The Canonical Diagnosis:* You are victimized by the "cause of inversion" (倒因), treating a passing sound and sensation as an absolute attack on an enduring "self." * **Mapping *Zizai Zhuan*:** * Wrong Mapping: Thinking mastery means becoming a cold, emotionless stone, suppressing all feelings, or forcing your boss to praise you. * Correct Mapping: This is where the transformation of feeling and conceptualization (「意受分別轉」) takes place. The sharp words are heard; the bodily tension is felt. But because you recognize that these appearances have no permanent, inherent self-entity (「倒因無體」), the feeling does not solidify into a crisis of identity. You respond to the constructive parts of the feedback with clear action (業自在), while your core awareness remains quiet and unblemished (「不動真法界」).

Scenario 3: Supporting a Loved One in Crisis (Boundaries & Expectations)

* The Ordinary Experience: You try to help a family member struggling with addiction or chronic negativity. You offer advice, but they ignore it and continue down a self-destructive path. You feel helpless, angry, and exhausted, feeling that your effort has been entirely wasted. * **Mapping *Zizai Zhuan*:** * Wrong Mapping: Thinking that if you practice Mahāyāna compassion, you should be able to instantly cure their addiction and force them to be happy. * Correct Mapping: Here, one must understand the boundary: 「諸佛無自在」 (even Buddhas cannot override another’s fixed karma). You offer assistance through diverse, practical means (「處處方便起」), but you recognize that their internal habits, choices, and karmic momentum (二種決定轉) belong to their own trajectory. You help wholeheartedly without falling into codependency or despair, maintaining your inner stability while continuing to be a supportive presence.


当代人为什么需要它 (Why Modern People Need It)

Modern life is characterized by an acute crisis of agency. We live in hyper-connected, algorithmically optimized environments designed specifically to capture our attention, commodify our emotional reactions, and keep us in a perpetual state of reactivity. Many contemporary individuals feel like passengers in their own lives—constantly reacting to emails, news cycles, and social expectations.

1. Beyond Modern Control Theory: Internal Basis vs. External Manipulation

When modern thinkers talk about "gaining control over life," they usually mean external optimization: managing schedules, optimizing productivity tools, or attempting to control external circumstances.

In contrast, *Zizai Zhuan* shifts the focal point entirely. It demonstrates that as long as our underlying cognitive basis remains rooted in grasping (*graha*), changing external circumstances is merely rearranging furniture in a burning house. True agency comes from 轉依 (Transformation of the Basis)—shifting from trying to control outer objects to mastering the mind’s relationship with all objects.

2. Dialogues with AI and Cognitive Science

We can draw a illuminating parallel between *Zizai Zhuan* and contemporary concepts in computer science and neuroscience:

* Algorithms & Automated Processing: An ordinary human mind functions remarkably like an automated, trained neural network: *Input (Sensory Data) → Habitual Weighting (Karmic Seeds) → Automatic Output (Emotional Reaction)*. * Neuroplasticity & Cognitive Flexibility: Neuroscience demonstrates that the brain can rewire its pathways (neuroplasticity), allowing us to break habit loops. This offers a helpful physical analog for how mental training alters behavioral responses.

Crucial Distinction & Scientific Limitation: However, we must avoid equating Buddhist *Zhuanyi* with neural plasticity. Cognitive science operates strictly within empirical, physical paradigms—it studies physical brain states, neural firings, and functional adaptations. Buddhist philosophy, specifically Yogācāra, targets the ultimate root of suffering: the subtle, primal illusion of a real, enduring subject-object dichotomy (能所雙亡). Science describes observed physical correlates; the Buddhadharma offers a path to existential liberation from cognitive delusion. Science does not "prove" Dharma, nor can neuroscientific optimization replace the profound spiritual shift of recognizing that delusion lacks inherent reality (迷因無體).


常见误读与澄清 (Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications)

誤讀一:把「自在轉」等同於外在的「神通主宰」或「隨心所欲」

* Clarification: Many assume "mastery" (*Zizai*) means the egoistic power to do whatever one wants—manipulating external events, bending others to one's will, or exhibiting magic powers. * As the treatises explicitly highlight through the concept of 「諸佛無自在」, spiritual mastery never violates the moral law of cause and effect. *"Operating according to one's true intent"* (隨自意轉) refers not to the self-centered desires of the personal ego, but to the uncorrupted, spontaneous responsiveness of wisdom (*jñāna*) free from self-grasping.

誤讀二:把「自然不行諸境界」理解為冷漠、逃避或麻木

* Clarification: Hearing that mastery involves "not roaming among or engaging with realms" (不行諸境界), some misinterpret this as stoic detachment, emotional suppression, or withdrawing from society into quietism. * In reality, "not roaming among realms" means the mind is not enslaved by the static appearances of those realms. Far from being passive, it enables 業自在 (Mastery of Enlightened Activity). Because a Bodhisattva is not paralyzed by fear, attachment, or mental projections, they can step directly into the messy reality of the world to help others (「廣大轉」 / 「於生死法中得自在」).

誤讀三:認為「自在」可以脫離「轉依」而單獨修得

* Clarification: People often seek quick mental tricks, mindfulness life-hacks, or emotional regulation strategies to feel "in control" without doing the deep work of untangling their fundamental delusions. * Classical Mahāyāna unequivocally asserts that *Zizai Zhuan* is a fruit (*phalāvasta*): 「依此轉依於一切相得大自在」 (“Based on this transformation of the basis, one gains great mastery over all appearances”). Without uprooting the underlying habit-energy of dualistic grasping, any feeling of "control" is temporary, fragile, and easily shattered when severe adversity strikes.

經文的跨文本回響 (Canonical Echoes)

This dynamic interplay between radical non-attachment and spontaneous action is the precise thread running through the most cherished Mahāyāna classics:

* In the *Heart Sūtra* (《般若波羅蜜多心經》), the opening proclamation—*"When Avalokiteśvara Bodhisattva practiced the deep Prajñāpāramitā, he illuminated the five aggregates as empty, transcending all suffering"*—describes the exact prerequisite of *Zizai Zhuan*: recognizing that sensory appearances and cognitive constructs lack inherent substance (迷因無體). * In the *Diamond Sūtra* (《金剛般若波羅蜜經》), the iconic dictum 「應無所住而生其心」 (“One should awaken the mind without abiding in any place”) is the exact operational mechanism of *Zizai Zhuan*. "Without abiding" (*wú suǒ zhù*) corresponds to 「自然不行諸境界」 (naturally not clinging to realms), while "arising the mind" (*ér shēng qí xīn*) corresponds to 「隨自意轉」 (spontaneously operating according to wisdom).

*Zizai Zhuan* reminds us that ultimate freedom is not a distant, static sanctuary. It is the capacity to walk through the bustling, chaotic marketplace of human experience—engaging fully, serving generously, and responding creatively—while remaining completely unmoved in the quiet depth of ultimate truth.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「自在转」(vaśitā-pravṛtti)谓诸佛菩萨由长久串习、转依究竟圆满,于一切法或一切相得自主运转之能;暂时生起欲乐,一切功德皆能圆满现前,无所滞碍。「自在」表自主无碍,「转」表功德、作用随欲乐而现起运转。此概念既指向自证境界之圆满,也体现于依所乐施作利生事业。

二、主要阐述

(一)自在转以转依圆满为基础。《摄大乘论释(无性释)》说「果圆满转」为永断一切障,使一切相不显现,最清净真实显现,因而「于一切相得自在」;并称「依此转依于一切相得大自在」,由此能随其所乐利益、安乐有情。故自在转之得以成立,以转依圆满为根本前提。

(二)如来于一切法自在转。《摄大乘论释(无性释)》明诸如来由长久串习,对一切法获得自主运转之能;只要暂时生起欲乐,一切功德便能圆满现前。此处之「转」非单指变化,而着重功德与作用能随意现起、无所滞碍。

(三)菩萨于生死法中得自在。菩萨兼通达法空无我性,虽断杂染而不弃舍生死;以自身转依为所依止,遂能于生死法中得自在,于一切趣示现各类有情之身,并于最胜生及三乘中,以种种调伏与方便善巧安立所化有情。

(四)自在转有明确界限。《摄大乘论释(无性释)》明佛对某些有情「不得自在」,不能任意令其涅槃。原因是有情或具烦恼障、业障、异熟障,或因无种性而阙少涅槃之因,又有「作重业决定」与「受异熟决定」二种决定转。因此,如来神通无碍与一切法自在,并不等于可越过有情自身之障、因与业果决定,强令一切有情解脱。

(五)自在由迷倒无体而立。《大乘庄严经论》以偈颂云:「迷因无体故,无迷自在行;倒因无体故,无倒自在转。」以颠倒、迷惑之因无实体故,明「无迷」而能自在行、「无倒」而能自在转。

(六)自在之定义——随自意转,不行境界。《大乘庄严经论》界定自在之内涵:「自在者,谓随自意转,自然不行诸境界。」并引经说:「若有相则被缚,若被缚则无解脱,不行一切境界即是解脱。」自在与解脱于此被视为同一层面之表述。

(七)自在为转依、解脱之根本因。偈颂云:「不见见应知,无义有义境,转依及解脱,以得自在故。」转依(转所依)与究竟解脱,皆「以得自在故」而得成就。于无义境界(诸相)不见,于有义境界(真如)见,名为转依;见所执境界无体、见真如有体,名为解脱;其所以如此,皆因得自在故。

(八)四种自在。《大乘庄严经论》说「意受分别转四种自在得者」:若意、若受、若分别三事能转,即得四种自在。次第为:「一得无分别自在、二得刹土自在、三得智自在、四得业自在」。此四种自在摄尽无分别智、佛土、智慧、事业之自在,皆由「转」意、受、分别而得。

(九)自在转之无碍与不动之相。《大乘庄严经论》偈颂云:「诸智所作业,恒时无碍行」;又云:「转法及法没,得道亦涅槃,处处方便起,不动真法界」。明虽于种种处以方便起道、得涅槃、转法轮,而恒不离、不动于真法界,此即自在转于境界中无碍运转之究竟相貌。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

《摄大乘论释(无性释)》以「自在转」与「得自在」为核心用语,正面表述为「于一切法自在转」;又用「于一切相得自在」「得大自在」「于生死法中……得自在」等形式;以「转依」「果圆满转」「广大转」说明自在所依的证成与作用;并特以「诸佛无自在」标示自在之界限。

《大乘庄严经论》则以「自在」一词为核心,配合「转」「行」「转依」展开。「自在转」非另立异名,而是「无倒转」之同义表述;本论更直接以「自在」标示,使用「无迷自在行」「无倒自在转」「随自意转」等表述,凸显「转」之自主无碍之义。

二经相较:《摄大乘论释(无性释)》侧重从转依所依之果位(佛、菩萨)与利他事业展开自在转之运作与界限;《大乘庄严经论》侧重从迷倒无体之哲学基础与境界层面定义自在之体相,并开出四种自在之分类。

四、与相关概念的关系

(一)转依(āśraya-parāvṛtti):自在转以转依圆满为基础;「果圆满转」即自在转所依之证成;「广大转」表菩萨于生死法中之自在运转。

(二)解脱:于《大乘庄严经论》中,自在与解脱被视为同一层面之表述;「不行一切境界即是解脱」;转依与解脱皆以得自在故而得成就。

(三)四种自在:《大乘庄严经论》开为无分别自在、刹土自在、智自在、业自在,由「转」意、受、分别而得。

(四)决定转:《摄大乘论释(无性释)》以「作重业决定」与「受异熟决定」二种决定转,说明佛于具此二种决定之有情不得自在。

五、代表性原文引用

1.《摄大乘论释(无性释)》:如来「于一切法自在转」,由长久串习,暂时生起欲乐,一切功德皆能圆满现前。

2.《摄大乘论释(无性释)》:「依此转依于一切相得大自在」,由此能随其所乐利益、安乐有情。

3.《摄大乘论释(无性释)》:佛对某些有情「不得自在」,不能任意令其涅槃,因具烦恼障、业障、异熟障,无种性阙少涅槃之因,或作重业决定、受异熟决定等二种决定转;故于此等有情「诸佛无自在」。

4.《大乘庄严经论》:「迷因无体故,无迷自在行;倒因无体故,无倒自在转。」

5.《大乘庄严经论》:「自在者,谓随自意转,自然不行诸境界。」并引经:「若有相则被缚,若被缚则无解脱,不行一切境界即是解脱。」

6.《大乘庄严经论》:「不见见应知,无义有义境,转依及解脱,以得自在故。」

7.《大乘庄严经论》:「意受分别转四种自在得者」,次第为无分别自在、刹土自在、智自在、业自在。

8.《大乘庄严经论》:「诸智所作业,恒时无碍行。」

9.《大乘庄严经论》:「转法及法没,得道亦涅槃,处处方便起,不动真法界。」

By SutraAI-generated

攝大乘論釋(無性釋)T1598 · 瑜伽部

《攝大乘論釋(無性釋)》論「自在轉」,核心用語正是「自在轉」與「得自在」,並以如來「於一切法自在轉」為最完整的正面表述。其義是諸如來由長久串習,對一切法獲得自主運轉之能;只要暫時生起欲樂,一切功德便皆能圓滿現前。此處的「轉」不是單指變化,而著重功德與作用能隨意現起、無所滯礙。

一、自在以轉依圓滿為基礎。《攝大乘論釋(無性釋)》說「果圓滿轉」是永斷一切障,使一切相不顯現,最清淨真實顯現,因而「於一切相得自在」。釋文又稱「依此轉依於一切相得大自在」,並說由此能隨其所樂利益、安樂有情。故自在不僅是自證境界,也表現在能依所樂施作利生事業。

二、菩薩的自在亦在「廣大轉」中呈現。菩薩兼通達法空無我性,雖斷雜染,卻不棄捨生死;以自身轉依為所依止,遂能於生死法中得自在,於一切趣示現各類有情之身,並在最勝生及三乘中,以種種調伏與方便善巧安立所化有情。這一表述把自在與不捨生死、示現多身及成熟有情相連。

三、自在有明確界限。《攝大乘論釋(無性釋)》先總說佛於一切法得自在轉,又特別說佛對某些有情「不得自在」,不能任意令其涅槃。其原因是有情或具煩惱障、業障、異熟障,或因無種性而闕少涅槃之因,又有「作重業決定」與「受異熟決定」二種決定轉。因此,如來神通無礙與一切法自在,並不等於可以越過有情自身的障、因與業果決定,強令一切有情解脫。

四、就術語記錄而言,《攝大乘論釋(無性釋)》使用「於一切法自在轉」「於一切相得自在」「得大自在」「於生死法中……得自在」等形式;又以「轉依」「果圓滿轉」「廣大轉」說明自在所依的證成與作用。其中特別值得保留的是「自在轉」這一動態用語:它不只表示具有自在,也表示功德、示現與利生作用能依欲樂圓滿現前;但對具障、闕因及二種決定轉的有情,則明言「諸佛無自在」。

大乘莊嚴經論T1604 · 瑜伽部

《大乘莊嚴經論》對「自在轉」——即於境界中無礙自主地運轉——之論述,以「自在」一詞為核心術語,配合「轉」、「行」、「轉依」等概念展開,茲歸納如次。

一、由迷倒之無體而立自在 論中偈頌云:「迷因無體故,無迷自在行;倒因無體故,無倒自在轉。」()此以顛倒、迷惑之因無實體故,明「無迷」而能自在行、「無倒」而能自在轉。此處以「自在」一詞同時修飾「行」與「轉」,顯示本論用詞之特色——「自在轉」非另立新名,而是「無倒轉」之同義表述。

二、自在之定義——隨自意轉,不行境界 釋文中明確界定自在之內涵:「自在者,謂隨自意轉,自然不行諸境界。」()此為「於境界中無礙自主運轉」之正面定義:自在非僅消極之不被繫縛,而是積極地隨順自己之意而轉,且「自然」不攀緣、不馳求於種種境界之相。論中並引經說:「若有相則被縛,若被縛則無解脫,不行一切境界即是解脫。」()自在與解脫,於此被視為同一層面之表述。

三、自在與轉依、解脫之關係 偈頌云:「不見見應知,無義有義境,轉依及解脫,以得自在故。」()轉依(轉所依)與究竟解脫,皆「以得自在故」而得成就。釋文更進一步闡明:於無義境界(諸相)不見,於有義境界(真如)見,名為轉依;見所執境界無體、見真如有體,名為解脫;其所以如此,皆因「得自在故」()。故「自在」為轉依、解脫得以成立之根本因。

四、四種自在——意、受、分別之轉所成 釋文論及「意受分別轉四種自在得者」:若意、若受、若分別三事能轉,即得四種自在。其次第為:「一得無分別自在、二得剎土自在、三得智自在、四得業自在」()。此四種自在攝盡無分別智之自在、佛土之自在、智慧之自在與事業之自在,皆由「轉」意、受、分別而得。此即本論「自在轉」之具體開展。

五、自在轉之「無礙」與「不動」之相 偈頌中兩度描繪自在轉之運作相狀:「諸智所作業,恒時無礙行」(),明諸智所成之業,恒常無礙而行;「轉法及法沒,得道亦涅槃,處處方便起,不動真法界」(),則明雖於種種處以方便起道、得涅槃、轉法輪,而恆不離、不動於真法界,此即自在轉於境界中無礙運轉之究竟相貌。

綜上,本論以「自在」一詞貫穿全體,配合「轉」、「行」、「轉依」之語,闡述於境界中無礙自主運轉之義:其體由迷倒無體而立,其相為隨自意轉而自然不行境界,其果為轉依與解脫,其類則開為四種自在,其行則恒時無礙、處處方便而於真法界不動。本論之術語特色在於:直接以「自在」標示,並未另立異名,且以「無迷自在行」、「無倒自在轉」、「隨自意轉」等表述,凸顯「轉」之自主無礙之義。

Related