Dharma · AI Companion

受生

upapattigrahaṇa

依业力于某趣取得新生AI-generated

Type PhenomenaDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

I. What This Concept Is About

In the Buddhist system of the path to liberation, "taking rebirth" (受生, upapatti-grahaṇa; also rendered 受身 "receiving a body," 還生 "returning to birth," 生 "birth") is not an abstract philosophical puzzle, nor a mythologized origin of life. It is the process by which sentient beings, after the dissolution of their old life-body (the continuity of the body, 身相續), are drawn by ignorance, unexhausted karmic forces, and the directional pull of the mind at the moment of death, to take birth in a corresponding destination and acquire a new life-body when causes and conditions are fully assembled.

It is the most crucial "junction point" in the cycle of birth and death (saṃsāra, 生死輪迴). If life is likened to a continuously flowing river, taking rebirth is the moment when the water, after falling off a cliff and passing through a canyon, re-crystallizes and enters a new channel. The ultimate liberation of Buddhism—nirvāṇa (涅槃)—is defined precisely by the complete cessation of taking rebirth, reaching the faultless state of "no further continuation of the body" (餘身不相續, no further production of a new life-subject).

To grasp "taking rebirth" with precision, it must be understood from four dimensions: its physiological conditions, its psychological dynamics, its true nature, and the harsh laws of transmigration through the six destinies (六道).

1. Physiological and Psychological Conditions: The Meeting of Three Conditions and the Summons of Thought

Life never arises from nothing. Taking rebirth requires extremely strict "physiological and psychological conditions" to interweave.

* Physiological conditions (the meeting of three conditions, 三事合會): The *Madhyama Āgama* (《中阿含經》, T26) presents the classic "meeting of three conditions" (三事合會) theory of entering the womb. For a sentient being to enter the womb and take rebirth, three conditions must be simultaneously satisfied: 1. The parents come together (父母合會, the physiological union); 2. The mother is fertile and able to bear (母滿精堪耐, the mother's physiology is healthy and capable of conception); 3. The scent-eater has arrived (香陰已至, the consciousness / intermediate being destined for rebirth has arrived). Only when these three "meet" at an extremely precise juncture in space and time can life enter the mother's womb, pass through nine or ten months, be nourished by mother's milk (called "blood" in the sūtra), and gradually develop all faculties (sense organs and bodily structures) to maturity.

* Psychological conditions (ignorance, the five desires, and the mind at death): The *Saṃyukta Āgama* (《雜阿含經》, T99) analyzes the inner driving force of taking rebirth. The fundamental reason ordinary beings repeatedly take rebirth lies in ignorance and delusion (愚癡無明): conceptually they "experience taking rebirth as pleasure," and in the new life they indulge in the delights of the five desires (五欲) corresponding to the eye, ear, nose, tongue, and body ("born, they enjoy the five desires," 生服受五欲), lacking any sense of disgust toward the cycle of birth and death.

More critically, thoughts and wishes directly summon the destination of rebirth. The sūtra uses the metaphor of the wild fox's call: if a person, at the time of death or in ordinary life, forms the attachment "I wish that in my future rebirth I may obtain such a form and utter such a sound," this thought and wish acts like a powerful magnet, precisely drawing the consciousness to be reborn in a corresponding type of form.

2. The Reality and Invisibility of Taking Rebirth: Breaking Annihilationism

Throughout history, people have often denied the afterlife and taking rebirth on the grounds that "the naked eye cannot see a soul being reborn." In the *Madhyama Āgama*, King Pāyāsi (蜱肆王) conducted "crude experiments"—weighing a condemned criminal before and after death, and even sealing a living person in a closed iron cauldron and burning him to death—and found no visible soul entering or leaving, nor any dramatic change in weight. He therefore concluded: "There is no afterlife; no beings are reborn" (無有後世,無眾生生). *"There is no next world; no beings take rebirth."*

The venerable Kumāra Kāśyapa (鳩摩羅迦葉) broke this with the classic "metaphor of the dream" (夢境之喻): just as a person lying in bed dreams of traveling through the world and playing, while those watching beside him can see no trace of his consciousness entering or leaving, so the taking of rebirth and the coming and going of sentient beings can never be directly captured by the naked eye or by material instruments.

Only a practitioner who, through cultivation, has cut off desires, hatred, and ignorance, and acquired the "pure divine eye" (清淨天眼, divyacakṣus), can see—as clearly as through transparent crystal—the true sight of sentient beings, according to the good and evil karma they have created, passing at death and birth between good destinations (human and heavenly) and bad destinations (hells, hungry ghosts, animals).

3. The Extreme Ratios of Good and Evil Destinies: Dust on a Fingernail and Dust on the Great Earth

Ordinary people often hold a blind optimism that being human is a matter of course. But the *Saṃyukta Āgama* uses the shockingly powerful metaphor of "dust on a fingernail and dust on the great earth" (甲上土與大地土) to reveal the extremely cruel probability distribution of rebirth among the six destinies:

* Observance of precepts or not: Sentient beings who, by keeping the eight precepts or the ten good deeds, are reborn in good destinies are as few as the dust carried in a fingernail's crevice (甲上土); those who do not restrain themselves by precepts are as many as the dust of the entire great earth (大地土). * After dying in evil destinies: Of those who die in the hells, the animal realm, the hungry ghost realm, and other evil destinies, those who can be reborn again in the human or heavenly realms are as few as "dust on a fingernail"; those who continue to fall and be reborn in evil destinies are as many as "dust on the great earth." * After dying in good destinies: Even those who in this life are human or heavenly beings—at death, those who can retain their good-destiny status and be reborn again are as few as "dust on a fingernail"; those who fall into the three evil destinies are as many as "dust on the great earth."

This metaphor reveals with profound force: in the network of karma, for life operating on inertia, falling is the high-probability event, while maintaining rebirth in a good destiny is extremely rare and difficult.

4. Position in the Twelve Links and the Path of Liberation

In the chain of the twelve links of dependent origination (十二因緣: ignorance 無明, volitional formations 行, consciousness 識, name-and-form 名色, six sense bases 六入, contact 觸, feeling 受, craving 愛, clinging 取, existence 有, birth 生, old age and death 老死), "taking rebirth" is the junction between "existence" (有) and "birth, old age, and death" (生、老死).

After sentient beings take rebirth and their faculties are complete, they encounter the objects of the world—forms, sounds, smells, tastes, tangibles, and mental objects—and generate craving and attachment. From craving arises strong clinging (取), which in turn builds a powerful momentum of life in the mind (conditioned by clinging, existence arises, 緣受有有), and this inevitably triggers the next period of rebirth (conditioned by existence, birth arises, 緣有有生), bringing about the great mass of suffering—birth, old age, sickness, death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief, and despair.

Conversely, the core path of cultivation is, through true contemplation, to cut off craving and clinging when facing objects (愛受), so that "when existence ceases, birth ceases; when birth ceases, old age and death cease." Moreover, the sūtra specifically proposes "abandoning the treasure of forms for rebirth; cutting off the treasure of forms for rebirth" (離受生色像寶,斷受生色像寶)—that is, cutting off attachment to material wealth and to desirable forms of rebirth—thereby utterly purifying the mind, and ultimately attaining "no further continuation of the body" (餘身不相續), advancing toward nirvāṇa.


II. A Walk-Through in Daily Life

To avoid understanding "taking rebirth" merely as a distant event after physical death, we can use scenarios extremely familiar to contemporary people—"scrolling short videos late at night" and "changing jobs / switching tracks"—to walk through the complete mechanism of taking rebirth in present psychological activity.

Scenario One: The "Psychological Mini-Rebirth" of Late-Night Video Scrolling

In fact, the taking of rebirth at physical death is merely the amplified version of the taking of rebirth in every moment of thought in daily life.

* Step One: The meeting of three conditions (physiological and psychological readiness) * Mis-mapping: Many people think "the meeting of three conditions" simply means the union of sperm and egg plus an intermediate being. * Correct mapping: In the present psychological scene, your phone screen (external object), your eyes and nervous system (organic physiological conditions), and the restless boredom and craving for stimulation stirring in your mind (the "scent-eater" / the momentum of consciousness)—these three meet precisely at 11 p.m. If any one is missing, this "experiencer of phone-scrolling" is not born. * Step Two: Clinging to the five desires and the summons of thought (the wild fox's call) * When you see a luxury unboxing video or an influencer's vacation clip, a feeling of envy and lack arises, followed by a subtle thought: "If only I could become such a person and live such a life!" * This thought is the "wild fox's call" of the sūtra. The wish you emit instantly pulls and projects your present consciousness into the form of "jealousy and comparison." * Step Three: From craving to clinging; rebirth is accomplished * Next, out of craving for this illusory pleasure, you keep scrolling downward (clinging, 取), your consciousness is completely immersed in the virtual splendor (existence, 有), and a "new self addicted to vanity and anxiety" is thus "reborn." In the next two hours, your peaceful life temporarily dies; you live in the continuity of jealousy and emptiness.

Scenario Two: Career Cliff and the "Near-Death Experience" of Switching Tracks

When a person faces industry layoffs or entrepreneurial failure, and the old identity (e.g., "senior executive at a major company") collapses, the psychological experience is extremely similar to the death and rebirth of a life.

* Breaking annihilationism (the dream metaphor): Outsiders see only that your business card has changed and your office is gone; but the violent panic and the stripping away of identity you experience deep inside—like King Pāyāsi's experiment that could not see a soul entering or leaving—is completely invisible to others. Your tossing and turning in anxiety and desire is exactly like "a person wandering and playing in a dream"—a real taking of rebirth that is only mind-made (唯心所現). * The cruel mapping of dust on a fingernail and dust on the great earth: When the old professional life ends, you need to be "reborn" into the next stage. * If during unemployment you can remain clear-headed, maintain self-discipline and moral integrity (keeping precepts), you can calmly find a more valuable new job that is healthy for body and mind (rebirth in a good destiny). The probability is like dust on a fingernail—extremely difficult to achieve. * Conversely, driven by anxiety and panic, most people fall into desperate remedies, giving up on themselves, sinking into drinking and depression, or being drawn into speculative fraud schemes (falling into evil destinies). The probability of this psychological and life fall is as vast as dust on the great earth. Your final thought at "death" (the moment of being laid off)—whether "hatred and revenge" or "clarity and reason"—directly determines the destination of your next professional life.


III. Why Contemporary People Need It

Although contemporary society is highly advanced in technology, on the spiritual level it is widely trapped in two extreme modes of thinking: one is crude materialist annihilationism, the other is a blind obsession with the infinite extension of the self. The Buddhist teaching of "taking rebirth" provides contemporary people with two extremely crucial antidotes:

1. Breaking the Nihilism of "Death Ends Everything" and Rebuilding Responsibility for Life

Modern technology and consumerism often plunge people into an "annihilationist view" (斷見)—believing that a person is merely a random combination of chemical elements, that death is the brain's power outage, and that after death all is nothing. This view appears free-spirited, but is in fact extremely dangerous. It leads many people, when facing life's difficulties or moral choices, to adopt an extreme mentality of wishful thinking: "As long as I don't get caught—or at worst, I can just die."

The teaching of "taking rebirth" tells us: life continues in the mode of "the continuity of the body" (身相續). The destruction of the physical body by no means equals the extinction of the momentum of consciousness. All the karma of hatred, greed, and harm to others that you create today forms a powerful psychological inertia (the attractive force of the "scent-eater"), which at the dissolution of the body forcibly drags you into the painful circumstances that match it. This law of taking rebirth according to karma makes contemporary people realize anew: every thought and every choice is sketching the picture of your future rebirth; there is no "death ends everything" that allows escape from responsibility.

2. Waking from the Passive Rebirth of "Algorithmic Life" and Regaining Control of Life

Contemporary people's lives have been devoured by powerful commercial algorithms and mechanisms of desire. You think you are the one choosing what to watch, what to buy, what to become—but in reality you have been in a state of passive "taking rebirth" all along: summoned by the stimulation of short videos, reborn into endless consumer desire; summoned by the comparisons of social media, reborn into anxiety and envy.

Understanding the mechanism of "thought-summoning" in rebirth, we can step on the brakes before algorithms and desire. The scientific community, in studying human decision-making and habit formation (such as the "stimulus-response" circuits in neuroscience), has also revealed a similar mechanism: the brain easily establishes automated response pathways based on immediate rewards. But science's limitation is that it largely treats this as a natural result of physiological mechanisms and finds it difficult to provide a value endpoint that transcends such mechanisms; Buddhism, by contrast, clearly points out that this automated "passive rebirth" is precisely the root of suffering, and that only by cutting off craving through awareness can one break the pull of karma and attain true freedom.


IV. Common Misreadings and Clarifications

In everyday discussion of Buddhist concepts, "taking rebirth" (受生) is one of the concepts most easily secularized, mythologized, or misapplied. Here are three of the most typical misreadings:

Misreading One: Equating "Taking Rebirth" with a Fixed "Soul" Moving House

* Clarification: This is the most common mistake, and the typical confusion of Buddhism's "taking rebirth" with the non-Buddhist "permanent self / soul transmigration" (神我 / 靈魂轉世). Buddhism teaches "no-self" (無我). In the process of taking rebirth, there is absolutely no fixed, unchanging soul—like a "little person"—that flies out of the old body and into a new one. The classic "scent-eater" (香陰, the intermediate being) or consciousness is not a fixed, unchanging entity, but a "dynamic momentum" (a continuum, 相續流) maintained by past karma and unsevered ignorance. Just as one candle lights another—the light of the second candle is not the light of the first flying over directly, yet there is a causal continuity between the two flames—taking rebirth is a dynamic continuum that is "not identical (not the same entity) and not annihilated (causality is not interrupted)" (非常亦非斷).

Misreading Two: Believing the Goal of Buddhist Practice Is to Pursue a "Good Rebirth" (Such as Rebirth in Heavenly Realms or Future Wealth)

* Clarification: This drastically narrows the path of liberation. The *Saṃyukta Āgama* states clearly that pursuing a better rebirth (such as seeking rebirth in heavenly realms or future wealth) is still "increasing all forms of existence" (增長諸有) and has not escaped the sea of suffering of saṃsāra. In the sūtra's discussion of the venerable Chanda (闡陀), it is asserted: if after abandoning this body a new life-body continues (餘身相續), then in the Buddha's teaching this still constitutes a "great fault" (大過); only by completely cutting off craving and clinging, attaining "no further continuation of the body" (餘身不相續)—no longer taking rebirth—is the faultless ultimate state of nirvāṇa. Buddhism's ultimate concern is not "changing to a better room in the prison (a good rebirth)" but "completely walking out of the prison (ending rebirth)."

Misreading Three: Misinterpreting the "Scent-Eater" (香陰) in the Conditions for Rebirth as a "Wandering Ghost"

* Clarification: The unique term "scent-eater" (香陰; Sanskrit *Gandharva*, rendered in other translations as 乾闥婆 or 中陰 intermediate existence) found in early scriptures such as the *Madhyama Āgama* is not the "ghost" or "specter" of common speech. "Scent-eater" specifically refers to the subtle mental momentum-body (意生身, mind-made body) that subsists between the end of the previous life and the formation of the next life, sustained by absorbing subtle fragrances. It is the indispensable mental condition in the meeting of the three conditions for taking rebirth. Misinterpreting it as a concretized, vengeful "ghost" in the secular sense is a crude and vulgarizing treatment of a precise scriptural term.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

受生(upapatti-grahaṇa),又称受身、生或还生,是指众生在命终之后,因业力、愚痴及心念的感召,在因缘具足时投生于相应处所,使生命体得以相续的过程。在佛教教义中,受生是生死轮回的核心环节,而彻底终结受生(即「余身不相续」)则是修行的终极解脱境界。

二、 主要阐述

1. 受生的生理与心理因缘 * 生理因缘(三事合会):《中阿含经》提出了独特的「三事合会」入胎说,指出众生入胎受生必须同时满足三个条件:一是「父母聚集一处」(或「父母合会」),二是「母满精堪耐」(或「无满堪耐」),三是「香阴已至」。只有这三者同时具足,才能「入于母胎」。胎儿入胎后,在母胎中度过九月或十月出生,并以母乳(经中称为「血」)长养,诸根逐渐发育成就。 * 心理因缘(愚痴与心念):《杂阿含经》则从心理层面揭示了受生的根源。凡夫众生因愚痴而「觉受生为乐」,并在受生后耽溺于五欲(「生服受五欲」),缺乏对生死的厌离心。此外,众生的心念与愿求直接感召受生去处,如经中以野狐鸣叫为喻,指出若生起「令我受身得如是形类,作如是声」的念头,便会因这种欲求而受生于相应的像类处所(「欲求如是像类处所受生」)。

2. 受生的真实性与不可见性(破除断见) 《中阿含经》中,尊者鸠摩罗迦叶与蜱肆王展开辩论,以破除「无有后世,无众生生」的断见。蜱肆王因肉眼看不见众生受生、往来的过程,且通过称量罪人死活体重、在密闭铁釜中烧死罪人等实验未发现灵魂出入,从而断言「无众生生」。鸠摩罗迦叶则以「梦境」为喻进行反驳:正如人在梦中周旋游戏,身旁的直侍人却完全看不见其神识出入往来一样,众生的受生与往来也绝非肉眼所能见。只有修行者断绝欲、恚、痴,获得「清净天眼」后,才能超越凡人,如实看见众生随其所造之业,在死时、生时往来善处及不善处的真实过程。

3. 受生于善恶道的极端比例 《杂阿含经》通过著名的「甲上土」与「大地土」的比喻,极为形象地说明了众生在六道中受生的极端比例: * 持戒与否的差异:持守八戒或十善而受生善道的众生,其数量微少如「甲上土」;而不持戒者则多如「大地土」。 * 恶道命终后的去处:从地狱、畜生、饿鬼等恶道命终后,能够受生于人道或天道的众生极少(如甲上土);而命终后还生于恶道的众生极多(如大地土)。 * 善道命终后的去处:从人道或天道命终后,能够再度还生于人天善道的众生极少(如甲上土);而堕落生于恶道的众生极多(如大地土)。 这表明在生死轮回中,保持善道受生是极其困难的。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典与译本中,对于「受生」及相关概念的表述存在显著差异: 1. 受生主体的称呼:对于投生的神识,《中阿含经》使用了独特的术语「香阴」,而在其他经典中,这一概念常被译为「乾闼婆」或「中阴」。 2. 受生与受身的互译:《杂阿含经》中,除了直接使用「受生」外,还常使用「受身」来指代获得某种形体,或使用「生/还生」指代在各道中投生。 3. 生命延续的表述:对于死后生命的延续,《杂阿含经》使用了「余身相续」这一表述。 4. 入胎条件的译名分歧:《中阿含经》在描述入胎条件时,存在不同的译法,如「父母聚集一处」与「父母合会」,「母满精堪耐」与「无满堪耐」。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 与十二因缘的关系:受生在十二因缘的流转与还灭中占据核心位置。《中阿含经》指出,众生受生并诸根成就后,若对世间色声香味触法等境产生乐着,就会因爱而生起执取(受),进而「缘受有有,缘有有生,缘生有老死」,导致整个大苦阴的聚集与受生轮回。反之,若能断除爱受,则能达到「有灭则生灭,生灭则老死灭」,从而彻底断绝受生。 2. 与涅槃解脱的关系:佛教修行的终极目的并非追求更好的受生,而是彻底终结受生。《杂阿含经》在讨论尊者阐陀命终后的去处时明确指出,「若有舍此身,余身相续者,我说彼等则有大过」;相反,「若有舍此身已,余身不相续者,我不说彼有大过也」。这表明「余身不相续」(即不再受生)才是无过失的涅槃境界。 3. 与修行净心的关系:《中阿含经》提到了「受生色像宝」这一术语,指出修行者应当「离受生色像宝,断受生色像宝」,以此净除其心。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《中阿含经》:「三事合会,入于母胎。父母聚集一处,母满精堪耐,香阴已至。此三事合会,入于母胎。」 2. 《中阿含经》:「此众生死时、生时,好色、恶色,或妙、不妙,往来善处及不善处,随此众生之所作业,见其如真。」 3. 《杂阿含经》:「若有舍此身,余身相续者,我说彼等则有大过;若有舍此身已,余身不相续者,我不说彼有大过也。」 4. 《杂阿含经》:「欲求如是像类处所受生……当作是学:我当精勤,方便求断诸有,不当增长诸有。」

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

本部經論「受生」之概念,主要見於鳩摩羅迦葉與蜱肆王往復詰辯「有後世、有眾生生」之問答,以及阿私羅仙人破斥諸仙妄說梵志清淨之段落。

就核心表述而言,本經以「受生」指依業力於某趣取得新生之義,與「死時」相對而言「生時」(見 chunk:3064、chunk:3065、chunk:3066)——即眾生身壞命終後,隨其所作業而於善處或不善處重新受生之際。迦葉告蜱肆王言:「若有沙門、梵志斷絕離欲……彼以清淨天眼出過於人,見此眾生死時、生時,好色、惡色,或妙、不妙,往來善處及不善處,隨此眾生之所作業,見其如真」,此即明受生依業而轉、由天眼可如實知見之理。

其次,經中以「身壞命終,必昇善處,乃生天上」正面表述依善業受生於天上之因果;而蜱肆王則執「無有後世,無眾生生」,以為身死即歸斷滅。雙方往復辯論,乃本部經論受生之獨特側面:從王執斷見之經驗觀察(如秤量死後之身、密蓋銅釜觀視出入)出發,以喻(如吹螺、夢中遊行)破其肉眼所見之限,進而以天眼為正知見受生之依據。此一「以天眼所見破肉眼所執」之論證架構,於本經反覆出現,值得留意。

又阿私羅仙人提鞞邏詰問諸仙曰:「頗知受生為男?為女?知所從來?為從剎利族來?梵志、居士、工師族來耶?為從東方、南方、西方、北方來耶?」,此處「受生」側重「如何出生」之義:性別、種姓、方土皆屬受生之事,諸仙不能知,乃為彼等妄稱「梵志種勝」之虛妄所設。

就本部經所用術語而言,與受生相關之詞彙有:「受生」(知所從來、生為男女之受生,見 chunk:4057)、「眾生生」(有無眾生之受生,見 chunk:3057、chunk:3061、chunk:3064)、「死時、生時」並稱(見 chunk:3064、chunk:3065、chunk:3066)、「生天上」(往至天界之受生,見 chunk:3061)、「往來善處及不善處」(流轉諸趣之受生,見 chunk:3064、chunk:3065、chunk:3066)。經中未見「投生」「託生」之詞,而以「生」、「受生」、「眾生生」為主。其中「眾生生」一詞作為有情相續受生之總名,於辯論脈絡中反覆出現,是本部經論受生之特殊用語形式。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

本經對「受生——依業力於某趣取得新生」之論述,主要呈現兩個側面:一是對求受某種形類而受生之愚癡執著之警誡,二是對「捨此身」後是否「餘身相續」之差別判定。

一、求受某形而受生之警誡。佛陀於後夜聞野狐鳴,於大眾前告諸比丘:有一愚癡人作念「令我受身得如是形類,作如是聲」,並欲求於「如是像類處所」受生。經文以此公案指出:愚癡人執著於某種身形而求受生,於輪迴中追逐形色之相,「何足不得」——意謂此等欲求並非難得,恰恰顯示輪迴之易入。本經於此使用「受身」、「形類」、「像類」、「受生」等樸素詞彙,直接描述依業力於某趣取得新生之事實,並未援引「中有」、「投生」等較為專門之名相。佛陀因而教誡:應精勤方便求斷諸有,莫作方便增長諸有——即以「斷諸有」對治「增長諸有」,以「求斷受生」取代「求受某形」。

二、「捨此身」與「餘身相續」之判定。尊者闡陀於那羅聚落好衣菴羅林中以刀自殺,舍利弗問佛:「彼尊者闡陀當至何趣?云何受生?後世云何?」此處「至何趣」詢問投生之處,「受生」即詢問取得新生之果,「後世」即來世之果報。佛陀之答覆以「餘身相續」為關鍵判準:「若有捨此身,餘身相續者,我說彼等則有大過;若有捨此身已,餘身不相續者,我不說彼有大過。」此語直接揭示本經所論「受生」之核心:所謂受生,即「餘身相續」——此身捨棄之後,是否仍有相續之新身體誕生。佛陀以此標準,判定尊者闡陀「無大過」,正是因為其捨此身後並無餘身相續。

三、術語之觀察。本經論「受生」時,圍繞幾組用語:「受身/形類/像類」描述新得之身形;「至何趣/後世」指向新生所歸之處;「餘身相續/不相續」則作為判定受生是否發生之準繩。全經未見「五蘊」、「阿賴耶識」、「中有」等較專門之名相,而以極為淺白之口語呈現輪迴之事實。值得注意的是,本經將「受生」與「諸有」並列:「求受生」屬於「增長諸有」之方便,而真正應作的是「斷諸有」,使無餘身相續——此即本經對「依業力於某趣取得新生」概念之核心教導。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》以「受生」為核心術語,輔以「本有」、「中有」、「四生」(胎卵濕化)、「六受」、「雜修」、「託生」等專有名詞,構成對依業取新之論述。以下分述之。

一、世尊以「善知受生」教示難陀,將「受生」與「受住」、「受衰異壞滅」並列,構成觀察有情一期存在之完整歷程:先受生,次受住,後受衰異壞滅。此處「受」字貫穿四階段,顯示有情對一期果報之承受。

二、論主以頌明「生」之因果本性:「生能生所生,非離因緣合」,明示「生」之功能在於能生起所生之法,而此能生必待因緣和合方得成就,離因緣則無生可言。此係對受生基本機制之原則性界定。

三、論中以「託生入定」明受生與定心之關聯,謂聖者「由託生入定,及離染退時,續善位得心,非先所成故」,意謂依託受生之身而入於定,於離染退時仍相續善位之心而得成就,非由先前所成。此顯示受生之身乃定心所依。

四、論主界定「本有」之時位:「此一業引故,如當本有形;本有謂死前,居生剎那後」,說明「本有」居於生之剎那之後、死前之間,乃同一業所引之相續狀態。此凸顯受生之剎那與後續存在之區隔。

五、就受生之種類差別,論主廣說「四生」:「如是且說胎卵二生,餘隨所應今次當說」。濕生者「染香故生」,謂遠嗅知生處香氣便生愛染往彼受生;化生者「染處故生」,謂遠觀知當所生處便生愛染往彼受生;隨業所應,香與處各有淨穢差別。乃至地獄受生,論主特以「由心倒故起染無失」釋之,謂彼「中有」見冷雨寒風逼切,便見熱地獄火焰熾然,情欣煖觸投身於彼;或見熱風盛火逼害,見寒地獄心欲清涼投身於彼。此即倒見所引之染愛而致受生。

六、論主復就「中有」之行相說明受生之方向:天中有「首正上升如從坐起」;人鬼傍生中有行相還如人等;地獄中有「頭下足上顛墜其中」。中有之行相即隨當所受生之趣而有差異。

七、就受生之結果,論主以「從此生六受,五屬身餘心」明生已即起六受,其中五受屬身、一受屬心,總攝色身與心識之感受。

八、論主亦提及「先雜修第四,成由一念雜,為受生現樂,及遮煩惱退」,明修習第四靜慮之雜修定,可為受生現法之樂,並遮止煩惱退失。此中「受生現樂」特指受生已得現法之樂。

綜上,《阿毘達磨俱舍論》以「受生」一詞貫穿有情一期存在之始,兼攝生之剎那、「本有」之相續、「四生」之差別、「中有」之趣向、生已「六受」之現起,乃至「雜修」所得現法之樂,構成一套對依業受生之完整論述。

Related