Dharma · AI Companion

upādāna

由爱而生的执取与依附AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

初立第一重(十二缘起支中爱增上而成的执取发动位,说流转因果);究竟第二重〔般若/中观:能取所取俱无自性,无所得故无可取,五取蕴亦如幻〕。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

这个概念在说什么

In the Buddhist understanding of existence, “取” (*Upādāna* / Clinging or Grasping) occupies a pivotal position in the Twelve Links of Dependent Origination (*十二因缘*, *dvādaśāṅga-pratītyasamutpāda*). It is defined in one line as: **The persistent mental grasping and attachment that arises from craving (*爱*, *taṇhā*), serving as the critical bridge in the cycle of birth and death that turns transient craving into conditioned becoming (*有*, *bhava*).**

To truly grasp *Upādāna*, one must look beyond popular, superficial translations like "possessiveness" or "greed." Etymologically and metaphorically in classical Pali and Sanskrit, *Upādāna* carries a dual meaning: it signifies both “grasping tightly with the mind” and “fuel”—just as a flame relies on wood or oil (*upādāna*) to sustain its burn, the fire of samsaric existence (*生死流转*) continuously burns because it is fed by the fuel of our mental grasping.

1. The Position of *Upādāna* in the Liberative Path

In the chain of Dependent Origination, the progression moves from contact to feeling, feeling to craving, and craving to grasping: $$\text{Contact (*触*)} \rightarrow \text{Feeling (*受*)} \rightarrow \text{Craving (*爱*)} \rightarrow \text{Clinging (*取*)} \rightarrow \text{Becoming (*有*)} \rightarrow \text{Birth (*生*)}$$

While craving (*爱*, *taṇhā*) is the initial spark of thirst, delight, or aversion when encountering pleasant or unpleasant experiences, **clinging (*取*, *Upādāna*) is the solidification of that spark into an entrenched mental pattern**. It is where a fleeting impulse turns into a totalizing psychological commitment. As the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*《大宝积经》*) states: *"If there is craving, there is the provisional establishment of clinging... If there is clinging, there is the provisional establishment of becoming."* [15302]

Without *Upādāna*, transient desires would flash and vanish without leaving the heavy psychological residue that drives karma (*业*, *karma*) and creates future rebirth (*有*, *bhava*).

2. Grasping Process vs. Objects of Grasping: Non-Entity Nature

In the *Saṁyuktāgama* (*《杂阿含经》*), a crucial distinction is made between: * **The Process/Mentality of Grasping (*取法*): Defined specifically as sensual desire and greed (*欲贪*, *kāma-rāga*)**. * **The Objects of Grasping (*所取法*)**: The six sense bases and their corresponding domains (*六入处*, *ṣaḍāyatana*—eye/forms, ear/sounds, nose/odors, tongue/tastes, body/touches, mind/mental phenomena) [5618].

Crucially, the sūtras emphasize that **there is no concrete, permanent "grasper" (*执取者*) behind the action**. In response to questions about who performs the grasping, the Buddha explicitly rejected the idea of a central controller or soul, stating: *"I do not say there is one who grasps."* [6060] *Upādāna* is not an agent; it is an impersonal, conditionally arisen psychological event. External objects do not possess an inherent magnetism that drags us in; rather, grasping arises because deceptive mental projections (*妄想起*) overlay those objects with distorted values [17627].

3. The Fourfold Classification of Clinging (*四取*, *Catur-upādāna*)

Early canonical texts such as the *Dīrghāgama* (*《长阿含经》*), *Saṁyuktāgama* (*《杂阿含经》*), and *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*《大宝积经》*) systematically categorize *Upādāna* into four distinct, exhaustive modes [9285, 6356, 15302]:

1. **Sensual Clinging (*欲取*, *Kāmupādāna*)**: The compulsive grasping onto the pleasures of the five senses (sight, sound, smell, taste, touch) and emotional experiences. It is the relentless pursuit of agreeable sensory inputs and the desperate attempt to freeze pleasant states of feeling (*受*).

2. **Clinging to Views (*见取*, *Diṭṭhupādāna*)**: The rigid adherence to dogmas, speculative theories, ideologies, and personal opinions. It occurs when the mind mistakes its own conceptual constructs, mental models, or intellectual positions for absolute reality, fiercely defending them against contradiction.

3. **Clinging to Rules and Rituals (*戒取* / *戒禁取*, *Sīlabbatupādāna*)**: The superstitious or dogmatic belief that external ascetic practices, rigid moral codes, compulsive routines, or formal rituals—devoid of genuine inner insight and wisdom—can, in and of themselves, bring about spiritual purity, liberation, or ultimate safety.

4. **Clinging to Self-Doctrine (*我取*, *Attavādupādāna*)**: The fundamental, deep-seated illusion that treats the Five Aggregates (*五阴/五蕴*, *pañca-skandha*—form, feeling, perception, mental formations, consciousness) as a permanent, solid "I" or "Mine" (*我、我所*). It is the root underlying all other clingings [5076].

4. Canonical Metaphors: Expansion, Contamination, and Rebirth

The scriptures use vivid metaphors to convey the operational nature of *Upādāna*: * **The Sprouting Seed (*从子生牙*)**: The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* compares *Upādāna* to a seed taking root and sprouting: *"That which causes the sprout to grow takes grasping-and-receiving as its root; through clinging in that realm, conception occurs."* [19193] It is the fuel that draws consciousness (*识*) to bind with feeling (*受*) and volition (*行*) to generate a physical body in rebirth. * **The Spreading Filth (*众秽恶聚,风吹恶流演*)**: The *Dīrghāgama* depicts the cumulative dynamics of grasping with a verse: *"Grasping this and grasping that, becoming continuously increases... Like a heap of filth spreading as the wind blows its foul streams, such is the causal nature of grasping, broad and pervasive due to craving."* [8340] Grasping is self-reinforcing; each act of clinging contaminates the mental field and expands the psychological territory of bondage.


生活里的走查 (A Walkthrough in Daily Life)

To see *Upādāna* clearly, we do not need to look at ancient ascetic traditions; we can observe it in the micro-moments of our contemporary daily routines—on our commutes, while scrolling on our smartphones, during overtime work, and in intimate relationships.

``` [Sense Contact: Six Bases] → [Feeling: Pleasant/Unpleasant] → [Craving: Wanting More/Removal] │ ▼ [UPĀDĀNA / 四取] ┌────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┐ ▼ ▼ ▼ Sensual Clinging Clinging to Views Clinging to Rules Self-Clinging (欲取) (见取) (戒禁取) (我取) ```

Scene 1: The Commute & Smartphone Scrolling

* **Sensual Clinging (*欲取*)**: You sit on the subway feeling a slight pang of boredom or fatigue (an unpleasant feeling, *苦受*). You pull out your phone and open a short-video app. A hit of dopamine hits as a funny or flashy video plays (a pleasant feeling, *乐受*). Craving (*爱*) wants this sensory stimulation to continue. *Sensual Clinging* occurs when your thumb compulsively swipes for two hours straight. The mind has latched onto the sensory stream of the screen as fuel to escape dullness, binding itself to the phone. * **Clinging to Views (*见取*)**: While scrolling, you stumble upon a political commentary or social news thread. You read a comment that directly contradicts your worldview. Instantly, heat rises in your chest. You spend twenty minutes typing an angry, elaborate reply to prove the stranger wrong. This is *Diṭṭhupādāna*—your identity has fused with a mental concept. You are no longer merely holding an opinion; the opinion is holding *you*.

Scene 2: Late-Night Overtime & Productivity Hacks

* **Clinging to Rules and Rituals (*戒禁取*)**: You are burnt out from working overtime, yet you follow a hyper-strict, 10-step biohacking morning routine, an unyielding 80-hour work week regimen, or a hyper-controlled system of task management. You believe that if you just strictly adhere to this exact ritual, rule, or technique, you will achieve complete security, mastery, and immunity from life's uncertainty. When an unexpected interruption disrupts your routine, you experience acute panic and rage. Here, the technique or rule has been elevated from a useful tool into an idol of liberation—a classic manifestation of *Sīlabbatupādāna*.

Scene 3: Intimate Relationships & Parenting

* **Clinging to Self-Doctrine (*我取*)**: Your romantic partner or child behaves in a way that violates your expectations. You feel deep distress, thinking, *"How could they do this to ME? They are ruining MY life / MY reputation!"* You view your child’s academic scores or your partner’s emotional state as an extension of "Self" and "Mine" (*我、我所*). When the child’s impermanent feelings, choices, or behaviors inevitably fluctuate (change in the Aggregates), your mind experiences terror, disturbance, and confusion (*恐怖、障碍、心乱*) [5076]. This suffering arises because you have mapped a static "Self" onto dynamic, impermanent phenomena.

Common Daily Mapping Errors

1. **Mismapping *戒禁取* (Clinging to Rules) as mere "self-discipline"**: * *Error*: Thinking that having a daily schedule or maintaining good habits is *Sīlabbatupādāna*. * *Correction*: Healthy discipline uses rules flexibly as practical instruments. *Sīlabbatupādāna* occurs when one superstitiously attributes inherent salvific power or absolute security to the rule itself, becoming neurotic and hostile when the rule cannot be kept. 2. **Mismapping *我取* (Self-Clinging) as mere "selfishness/egoism"**: * *Error*: Equating *Attavādupādāna* only with overt arrogance or self-centered behavior. * *Correction*: Self-clinging is much subtler. Even deep self-loathing, severe anxiety, or martyrdom (*"I am the most unfortunate person in the world"*) is pure *Attavādupādāna*, because it relies on the deeply held illusion of a solid, enduring "I" residing within the Five Aggregates.


当代人为什么需要它

Contemporary society is arguably an unprecedented **engine of *Upādāna***. We live in an era engineered by feedback loops, algorithmic reinforcement, and extreme cognitive specialization. Understanding the mechanism of *Upādāna* provides modern individuals with an essential mental surgical tool.

1. Breaking the Algorithmic "Craving-to-Clinging" Loop

Modern digital technology operates precisely on the junction between *Taṇhā* (Craving) and *Upādāna* (Clinging). * An algorithm detects a subtle, micro-second lingering of your attention (*Craving*). * It immediately serves you more of the same content, encouraging you to save, bookmark, defend, or binge-watch (*Clinging*). * Over time, this solidifies into an online subculture identity or an addictive behavioral pattern (*Becoming* / *有*).

By understanding *Upādāna*, one learns to insert a wedge of mindful awareness right after craving arises. You recognize: *"A sensation of craving was triggered, but I do not have to escalate it into mental grasping (*取*)."*

2. De-escalating Ideological Polarization

Social platforms thrive on *Diṭṭhupādāna* (Clinging to Views). In contemporary public discourse, nuanced dialogue is frequently replaced by tribal identity battles. When we realize that our views are merely impermanent mental constructs (*所取法*) rather than our fundamental identity, we gain the room to entertain differing perspectives without feeling that our core existence is under mortal attack.

3. Modern Analogies & Their Boundaries

* The AI / Machine Learning Analogy: We can compare *Upādāna* to an AI system that takes a single user prompt or preference (*Craving*) and continuously overfits its neural weights around that data point until its entire world-model is distorted (*Becoming*). * *Boundary & Limitation*: An AI's "overfitting" is an objective mathematical process of data weights. Buddhist *Upādāna*, however, is an inner, subjective, karmically potent link deeply intertwined with ignorance (*无明*, *avidyā*) and subjectivized suffering (*苦*, *dukkha*). Algorithms process statistics; mind experiences liberation or bondage.


常见误读与澄清

误读一:执取(取)意味着存在一个“能执取的本体/主体”

* Misconception: "If there is grasping happening, there must be an underlying soul, ego, or 'I' doing the grabbing." * Clarification: Classical Buddhadharma explicitly rejects this reification. In the *Saṁyuktāgama*, when asked who performs the grasping, the Buddha firmly denied the existence of a permanent "grasper" (*我不说言有取者*) [6060]. *Upādāna* is an interactive, conditionally sustained process—like fire consuming fuel. Fire is not a static object that "holds" wood; fire *is* the process of combustion occurring when fuel, oxygen, and heat coincide. Similarly, grasping is simply the temporary convergence of craving, illusion, and sense objects.

误读二:断除“取”就是彻底放弃一切目标、规则与行动

* Misconception: "If I eliminate *Upādāna*, I can no longer pursue a career, follow health guidelines, hold ethical boundaries, or make plans, because that would be 'clinging'." * Clarification: The sūtras explicitly state that the path to severing the Four Clingings is the **Noble Eightfold Path (*八正道*)** [6356]. Practicing Right Action, Right Livelihood, or Right Effort is not *Upādāna*. The crucial boundary lies in **mental attachment (*心顾念、心缚着*) versus functional engagement**. Wisdom acts decisively, sets boundaries, and pursues wholesome goals without constructing a false "I/Mine" around the outcomes, and without falling into superstitious dogmatism (*戒禁取*). Action without clinging is clear, compassionate, and flexible.

误读三:混淆“爱”(Craving)与“取”(Clinging)

* Misconception: "Craving (*爱*) and Clinging (*取*) are basically the same thing; dividing them is just hair-splitting." * Clarification: In the classical framework, *Taṇhā* (*爱*) is the initial emotional or sensory thirst—a momentary movement of leaning toward or pushing away from a feeling (*受*). *Upādāna* (*取*) is the secondary, consolidated phase where the mind adopts, internalizes, and turns that thirst into a fixed stance or identity. *Taṇhā* is like an itch; *Upādāna* is the relentless, destructive scratching that creates a chronic wound. In the reverse contemplation of Dependent Origination (*逆观十二因缘*), when craving is extinguished through insight into impermanence (*无常*), grasping naturally collapses (*爱灭则取灭*) [5820], halting the accumulation of existential suffering (*纯大苦聚灭*) [5582].

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

“取”(upādāna)在佛教经典中是十二因缘的核心环节之一。它以“爱”为缘而生起,同时又是“有”生起的因缘,即“爱缘取,取缘有”。在本质上,“取”代表了众生对世间万物及自我的强烈执取、贪著与妄想。经典明确指出,“取”并非一个实体性的“执取者”,而是因缘生起的心理现象,其本质为“欲贪”。它是导致众生堕入生死大苦、产生“纯大苦聚”的必经之路。

二、主要阐述

1. “取”的分类

在《長阿含經》、《雜阿含經》与《大寶積經》中,均对“取”进行了明确的分类。通常将其细分为四种,即“欲取、见取、戒取(或戒禁取)、我取”。这四种执取涵盖了对感官欲望的追求(欲取)、对各种邪见与妄想的执着(见取)、对无益戒条与禁忌的执守(戒取/戒禁取),以及对自我实体的虚妄执着(我取)。

2. “取”的生起机制与运作

“取”的生起根源于“爱”与愚痴。众生因不能了知生灭流转的实相(“转无转”),在贪心中产生取著。对于眼色、耳声等“所取法”(六入处),众生因“味著、顾念、心缚著”而生起爱,进而增长了“取”。这种执取并非外在事物本身具有吸引力,而是由于众生内心的“妄想起”,才产生不实的欲望。

《長阿含經》以偈颂生动描绘了“取”的运作:“取彼取彼已,展转更增有”,揭示了执取行为的循环累积。经中更以“众秽恶聚,风吹恶流演”为喻,将因爱而广布的执取比喻为污秽恶臭之物的聚集与流溢,形象地说明了其染污性与扩张性。

3. “取”在生命投生与流转中的作用

“取”是生命延续和投生的根本动力。《大寶積經》以“从子生牙”(种子发芽)为喻,指出“所生子牙者以取受为本,彼处取故即便受胎”。此身的成就,正是“因识有受有取有识有诸行思念成就身体”。当生命终结、此识舍弃现有的身形后,会因“取”而前往他处“复受余诸阴”。

4. “取”的过患与解脱之道

“取”是痛苦与执着的根源。愚痴凡夫对于五阴,执取为“我、我所”,一旦这些法发生变异,其心便随之转变,产生取著,从而生起“恐怖、障碍、心乱”。《雜阿含經》强调“取故生著,不取不著”。

若要断除生死流转,必须灭除“取”。在逆观十二因缘中,“爱灭则取灭,取灭则有灭……如是纯大苦聚灭”。修行者若能对“所取法”观察其“无常、生灭、离欲、灭尽、舍离”,做到“心不顾念,心不缚著”,则爱灭而取灭。

断除四取的具体路径是修习“八正道”。修行者必须对“取”以及“取集、取灭、取灭道迹”如实知,超度“取”,并成就“取智、取集智、取灭智、取灭道迹智”。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同部类及译本中,关于“取”及相关概念的术语使用存在鲜明的译经特色:

1. “取”的分类名称: - 《長阿含經》(后秦佛陀耶舍、竺佛念译)与《雜阿含經》(刘宋求那跋陀罗译)中,四取表述为“欲取、见取、戒取、我取”。 - 《大寶積經》(唐菩提流志等译)中,则表述为“欲取、见取、戒禁取、我取”,将“戒取”译为“戒禁取”。

2. “五蕴”的译名: - 《長阿含經》将“五蕴”译为“苦阴”、“大苦阴”或“苦盛阴”。 - 《雜阿含經》使用“五阴”或“阴”。 - 《大寶積經》则混用“诸蕴”(如“诸蕴出现”、“诸蕴散坏”)与“阴”(如“复受余诸阴”)。

3. “六处”与“无明”的译名: - 《長阿含經》将“无明”译为“痴”;将“六处”译为“六入”或“六入身”。 - 《雜阿含經》中则使用“六入处”。

4. 独有术语: - 《雜阿含經》中将执取对象与执取心理分别定义为“所取法”(六入处)与“取法”(欲贪);使用“使”指代随眠(烦恼),如“随使使、随使死者,则为取所缚”;并在偈颂中使用“取受世”来表达世间的执取与维系。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与“爱”的关系: “取”直接依“爱”而建立。如《大寶積經》云:“若有于爱则有假立于取,若无于爱则无假立于取”。众生被“爱”所吞噬,追逐欲望,从而产生“定执”与“取著”。

2. 与“有”的关系: “取”是“有”(生存的束缚与业报)生起的直接因缘。若无四取,则不会产生欲有、色无色有。“取彼取彼已,展转更增有”,若取永灭,则有永灭。

3. 与“随眠(使)”的关系: 《雜阿含經》指出,修行者若随顺随眠(使),就会被随眠所役使,进而“为取所缚”;若不随顺随眠,则能从“取”中得解脱。

4. 与“触”、“受”及“识”的关系: 在十二因缘的流转中,由六入身生触,触生受,受生爱,爱生取。而在生命投生过程中,“取”与“受”、“识”共同作用,因“识有受有取有识有诸行思念”而成就身体。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《長阿含經》:“有从取起,有是生缘;有从取起,取是有缘;取从爱起,爱是取缘。” 2. 《長阿含經》:“取彼取彼已,展转更增有;是故如来说,取是有因缘。如众秽恶聚,风吹恶流演;如是取相因,因爱而广普。” 3. 《雜阿含經》:“取法者,谓欲贪;所取法者,谓眼色、耳声、鼻香、舌味、身触、意法。” 4. 《雜阿含經》:“愚痴无闻凡夫于色见是我、异我、相在。整理彼色,言:‘是我、我所。’……心随转变,取著摄受心住。取著摄受心住已,得恐怖、障碍、心乱。” 5. 《大寶積經》:“若有于爱则有假立于取,若无于爱则无假立于取。若有于取则有假立于有,若无于取则无假立于有。” 6. 《大寶積經》:“所生子牙者以取受为本,彼处取故即便受胎……因识有受有取有识有诸行思念成就身体。”

By SutraAI-generated

長阿含經T0001 · 阿含部

《長阿含經》以「取」一詞貫穿十二因緣之說,將其定位為由「愛」所生、復生於「有」的環節。經文明言「取從愛起,愛是取緣」,又以逆推方式說「愛無故取無」,確立「愛緣取、取緣有」之因果必然。

關於「取」之內涵,經中將其析為四種:「欲取、見取、戒取、我取」,並以此為觀察對象,反問「若使一切眾生無有欲取、見取、戒取、我取者,寧有有不?」,藉此論證「取」是「有」(存在、再有)之直接因緣。

此經復將「取」置於完整的緣起鏈條中說明:「緣癡有行……緣受有愛,緣愛有取,緣取有有,緣有有生,緣生有老、病、死、憂、悲、苦惱,此苦盛陰,緣生而有」,並以同樣的順序反觀滅:「愛滅故取滅,取滅故有滅……生滅故老死滅」。此種順逆雙向的論述,是本經闡釋「取」之因緣結構的獨特表述。

值得注意者,「取」之生起非無因,而是緊隨「愛」而起。經中將「愛」分為「欲愛、有愛、無有愛」三類,與「取」之四類形成對應;此外,愛更衍生「求、利、用、欲、著、嫉、守、護」等連鎖,由此可見本經視「取」為「愛」之延伸與具體化——愛是內心之染著,取是染著之執持與佔有。

從經文脈絡觀之,「取」之論述出現於三種場合:一是菩薩因觀老病死苦而推求緣起;二是阿難於靜處思惟十二因緣「甚深難解」,世尊為其詳細解說每一支之因緣關係;三是在破斥外道邪見(「此世間自造」等)時,以緣起正見加以對治。其中以阿難請問一段最為詳備,對每一緣之「何義」「寧有不」的反覆問答,是本經獨具的教說形式。

在術語方面,《長阿含經》通篇以「取」一字表示執取、攀緣之義,未見「執取」「執著」等異稱;以「愛」表示貪染、渴愛,亦未用「貪愛」「渴愛」等詞。此一簡約用詞,反映北傳早期阿含經典之術語風格,亦為本經在概念表達上之特色。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》對「取」的論述,以緣起脈絡為骨幹,將「取」定位為由愛而生的執取與繫縛。其核心表述為「取故生著,不取則不著」,明確指出取與著之間的因果關係。

此經界定「取」的內涵時,先從認識論入手:愚癡無聞凡夫於「色、受、想、行、識」見我、異我、相在,視之為「我、我所」而取;所取之物若變異,心即隨轉,遂生取著攝受,進而引發恐怖、障礙、心亂。多聞聖弟子則於色等不見我、不見我所而不取;心不隨轉,便無恐怖障礙心亂,此即「不取不著」之相。此處經文以「取著」、「攝受」描述執取的具體心理狀態。

「取」與「愛」的因果關係是本經反覆強調的重點。在十二支緣起中,「緣愛取,取緣有」,取直接由愛推動,並進一步推動「有」,構成純大苦聚的環節;經中亦直言「取所取故」,強調取之對象性。對治方面,「愛滅則取滅」——觀察所取法無常、生滅、離欲、滅盡,心不顧念、不縛著,愛即止息,取亦隨滅。本經以「油炷燈」與「積薪火聚」為譬喻:若不增油治炷、不添薪草,火焰自然熄滅。

「取」也被界定為繫縛之因。經云「隨使使、隨使死者,則為取所縛;不隨使使、不隨使死者,則於取解脫」,此處以「取」與「使」(煩惱驅使者)相對應,揭示取即繫縛本身;取若斷,則於取解脫。舍利弗與閻浮車的對論中,則將「取」分為四類:「欲取、我取、見取、戒取」,並明示斷此四取之道為八正道(正見乃至正定)。本經亦將「取」列為「四十四種智」之一,謂「取智、取集智、取滅智、取滅道跡智」,標誌其為如實觀察的對象。

值得留意的是,此經亦出現「取受世」之用語:「六法起世間,六法世和合,六法取受世,六法世損滅」,顯示「取」亦被理解為世間對六法的執取承受,與個人緣起層面的取有所不同。

關於術語,此經以「色、受、想、行、識」五項作為所取對象;對於「取」之分類,使用「欲取、我取、見取、戒取」四取之名;其觀察所取之法的對治語為「無常、生滅、離欲、滅盡、捨離」,強調離欲與捨離的心態。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

本經對「取」之論述,主要從緣起次第、染著流轉及受胎過程三方面交織展開,顯示「取」乃依「愛」而生之執取與依附。

一、明取之體相。於十二因緣中,本經明確界定取為四種:欲取(對五欲之執取)、見取(執持種種邪見以為正見)、戒禁取(執著種種戒禁之行以為可得解脫)、我取(執著自我之見以為真實)。經云:「云何為取?所謂欲取、見取、戒禁取、我取,故名為取。」

二、明取之所由生與「假立」之性。本經以「假立」一語貫穿緣起各支,云:「若有於愛則有假立於取,若無於愛則無假立於取」,直顯取乃依愛為因緣而施設。所謂愛者,經云:「色愛、聲愛、香愛、味愛、觸愛、法愛,是名為愛」,即對六塵境界之貪戀染著。愛若無則取不施設,顯示取乃依他而立之施設法,而非自有自生之實法。

三、明愛生取之內在機轉與過患。經云:「愛所吞眾生,尋逐於諸欲,得利興我所,從此生定執,我當作所作。」眾生為愛所吞,馳逐諸欲;於所獲利養而起「我所」之想,由「我所」堅生「我當作、我當為」之定執,欲貪之縛因而增長,慳悋守護相續而起,遂起爭競、刀仗相加、造諸不善業、招致眾苦。經末云:「觀愛因緣已,眾苦則不生,無根無住覺,諸覺中最上」,以觀察愛之因緣為離苦之要。

四、明取愛於受胎輪轉中之共同運作。經以「譬如從子生牙,所生子牙者以取受為本」為喻,明示新生命之受胎以取受為根本。又云此身「因識有受有取有識有諸行思念成就身體」,並描述識流轉之際「以受和合,以愛相縛以念相執,善攀緣和合、或非善攀緣和合」,顯示於生命延續之際,愛為縛繫之力、念為執持之力、取為取著之力,三者和合成就新陰之身。

五、本經特殊用語之辨識。其一,以「假立」標示緣起各支——如「假立於取」、「假立於有」、「假立於生」——此語強調諸支乃因緣和合之施設,非實有自性,此乃本經論述緣起之獨特表述。其二,於識之流轉採用「神識」與「情識」之語,如釋老為「情識惛耄」、釋死為「喪滅轉世」,語彙兼具通俗之詮與深義之表。

Related