Dharma · AI Companion

saṃskāra

「行」是五蕴之一与十二因缘第二支,指一切有为造作、迁流变化之法,其核心为「思」。

A Contemporary Reading

Here is a deep exploration of the Buddhist concept of 行 (Saṃskāra), written for a contemporary audience, combining relatable life scenarios with profound philosophical insights.

***

### 这个概念在说什么 (What This Concept is Saying)

To understand Buddhism's path to liberation, we must understand the engine that keeps us trapped in suffering. That engine is 行 (Saṃskāra)—often translated into English as "volitional formations," "mental formations," or simply "activities."

In the classical teachings, 行 (Saṃskāra) holds two monumental positions: it is the fourth of the Five Aggregates (五蕴 - Wǔ Yùn, the components that make up our body and mind) and the second link in the Twelve Links of Dependent Origination (十二因缘 - Shí'èr Yīnyuán, the chain of cause and effect that drives the cycle of rebirth).

But what does it actually mean? At its absolute core, the sutras define "行" as 思 (Sī)—volition, intention, or the active will to construct and do. It is the psychological momentum that responds to the world. It encompasses all conditioned, fabricated, and constantly changing phenomena (有为造作、迁流变化之法).

The Buddha categorized these formations into three avenues of expression: 身行 (bodily formations), 口行 (verbal formations), and 意行 (mental formations). Furthermore, he mapped their psychological mechanism as the 六思身 (the six classes of volition)—the urges that arise when our six senses (eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind) make contact with the external world.

To illustrate the profound emptiness of these urges, the *Saṃyukta Āgama* (杂阿含经) provides a striking, specific metaphor: 行如芭蕉 (Formations are like a plantain/banana tree). If you have ever seen a banana tree, you know it doesn't have solid wood inside. It is just tightly packed layers of sheaths. If you were to take a knife and peel away the layers of a banana tree trunk, hoping to find a solid, hard core (heartwood), you would eventually peel away the whole tree and be left with nothing.

This is the exact 1:1 structural mapping the Buddha intended for our willpower and urges: * The peeling process: When a practitioner meditates and meticulously observes their own urges, motivations, and mental constructions layer by layer. * The lack of a solid core: Upon deep inspection, there is no permanent "Self" (无我 - Anātman), no "author," and no solid soul directing these urges. They are simply temporary reactions born of conditions (和合故生), entirely hollow and without substance.

In the grand architecture of the path of liberation (解脱道), is the bridge between ignorance and our continued suffering. Because we misunderstand reality (无明 - Avidyā, ignorance), we generate these blind urges (无明缘行 - ignorance conditions formations). These urges then plant the karmic seeds that shape our consciousness (行缘识 - formations condition consciousness), dragging us through endless cycles of existence. To the unawakened, these formations are a "heavy burden" (重担) and a "demonic bondage" (魔缚). The ultimate goal of the practitioner is to see through their impermanent, hollow nature, leading to detachment, tranquility, and the ultimate stillness where all formations cease (一切行尽 - the exhaustion of all formations, which is Nirvana).

### 生活里的走查 (A Walkthrough in Daily Life)

To truly grasp 行 (Saṃskāra), we cannot leave it in ancient texts. We must watch it operate in real-time. Let’s do a walkthrough of a highly relatable contemporary scenario: receiving a late-night work message on your phone.

Imagine it's 10:30 PM. You are relaxing. Suddenly, your phone screen lights up with a message from your boss asking for a project update.

1. Contact (触 - Chù): Your eyes see the glowing pixels on the screen, and your mind registers the words. 2. Feeling (受 - Shòu): A sudden tightness in your chest arises, a flash of unpleasant sensation. 3. The Arising of Formations (行 - Saṃskāra): Immediately, the engine roars to life. Your mind begins to race. *“If I don’t reply, I’ll look bad.” “I hate this job.” “Let me quickly draft a polite response.”* You might physically sit up, mentally compose a sentence, and feel the intense, driving urge to tap the screen.

This urge, this psychological momentum and active construction of a response, is precisely "行" (Saṃskāra).

Where people map it wrong: We are deeply conditioned to think, *"I am angry, therefore I am choosing to reply."* We falsely attribute the urge to a solid, unified "Self" inside our heads. We think the banana tree has a solid core.

But the Buddhist walkthrough asks you to look closer. There is no solid "you" deciding to be stressed. There is only a chain of conditions: Sight met screen (Contact), tension arose (Feeling), and past habits of work-anxiety combined with the current stimulus to produce an urge to type (Volition/Saṃskāra). By recognizing the urge merely as a temporary, conditioned "formation" rather than "me" or "mine," you suddenly create a space. You don't have to act on it. You can watch the urge arise, peak, and pass away, just like peeling away a hollow sheath of a banana tree.

### 当代人为什么需要它 (Why Contemporary People Need It)

Contemporary people desperately need the wisdom of 行 (Saṃskāra) because we live in an era where our "formations" are being actively harvested.

The modern attention economy, driven by sophisticated algorithms on social media and e-commerce platforms, is essentially a machinery designed to trigger our 六思身 (six classes of volition). An infinite scroll is designed to continuously provide visual and auditory contact (), engineer micro-dopamine feelings (), and reliably trigger the urge to keep scrolling, clicking, and buying (). When we do not understand the hollow, conditioned nature of our urges, we become predictable data points, enslaved by external stimuli.

Interestingly, contemporary neuroscience and artificial intelligence offer a fascinating parallel through the concept of "Predictive Processing." Neuroscientists suggest that our brain is not a passive camera but an active "prediction machine," constantly constructing our reality based on past data to anticipate the next moment. This strongly echoes the sutra's assertion that our current experience is 本行所作 (created by past formations).

*A necessary caveat:* While it is tempting to say science is "proving" Buddhism, we must be careful. Neuroscience maps the biological mechanics of how the brain constructs reality, but it remains a descriptive science. It does not resolve the hard problem of subjective consciousness, nor does it offer a moral or existential escape route from suffering. The Buddha’s teaching of goes beyond mechanics; it is deeply ethical and soteriological. It doesn’t just explain the engine; it teaches us how to turn the engine off.

Understanding gives contemporary people their agency back. When you realize that your anxieties, compulsions, and frantic thoughts are just impermanent "formations" lacking a solid core, they lose their terrifying grip over you. You stop being a slave to every notification and every internal impulse.

### 常见误读与澄清 (Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications)

Misunderstanding 1: Narrowing "行" to physical walking or external actions. Because the modern Chinese word "行动" means physical action, many beginners think "行" just refers to moving the body. *Clarification:* The classical definition explicitly places the core of "行" in 思 (volition/intention). You can be sitting perfectly still in a silent room, but if your mind is violently plotting an argument or craving a slice of pizza, you are drowning in "行". It is the *will* and the *psychological construction*, which may or may not manifest as bodily or verbal action.

Misunderstanding 2: Confusing "行" (Saṃskāra) with "想" (Saṃjñā). People often lump all mental activity into "thoughts" and confuse the Aggregate of Perception () with the Aggregate of Formations (). *Clarification:* The classical texts strictly maintain their independence (as the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* states, they do not mix). 想 (Perception) is the cognitive act of recognizing and labeling a target ("Ah, this is an apple" or "This is my boss's face"). 行 (Formations) is the subsequent active, volitional response to it ("I want to eat that apple" or "I need to impress my boss"). Perception takes the photograph; Volition directs the movie.

Misunderstanding 3: Believing that because "行" is empty and causes suffering, Buddhism asks us to become emotionless stones immediately. Some read that all formations are impermanent (一切行无常) and should be extinguished, leading them to a nihilistic, passive paralysis. *Clarification:* The path of liberation is gradual and practical. While the ultimate reality is unconditioned and still, the Bodhisattva path embraces the skillful use of formations. This is why the texts speak of 六度万行 (the myriad practices of the Six Perfections)—generosity, ethics, patience, joyous effort, concentration, and wisdom. The Eightfold Path itself is a fabricated "formation" used as a raft. We use wholesome formations (good habits, ethical intentions, meditative focus) to counteract unwholesome formations (greed, anger, ignorance). We build a strong, reliable raft of good karma to cross the river of suffering. It is only when we reach the other shore of Nirvana that we finally leave the raft behind, realizing the profound silence where all formations find their ultimate rest (一切皆寂静).

Canonical Entry

### 一、 定义与核心要义 「行(saṃskāra)」是佛教的核心概念之一。它既是构成众生身心的五蕴(或五阴)之一,也是十二因缘中的第二支。其核心内涵在于「思」(即意志、意向与造作活动),泛指一切有为法的迁流、造作与变易。在本质上,诸行具有无常、苦、空、非我的特质,是推动生命流转的动力,亦是修行者需要如实观察并予以断除、超越的对象。 ### 二、 主要阐述 1. 行的定义与分类 在经典中,「行」的定义主要从造作途径与心理机制两个层面展开。从造作途径来看,《中阿含经》将「行」明确分类为三种,即「身行、口行、意行」,如实了知这三种行即是「知行如真」[chunk:2629]。从心理机制来看,「行」的核心在于「思」。《杂阿含经》在「七处善」的教示中指出:「云何行如实知?谓六思身——眼触生思,耳、鼻、舌、身、意触生思,是名为行」[chunk:5067, 5071]。这表明「行」是由六种感官接触(触)而引发的六种意念造作。同样,《大宝积经》在阐释十二因缘时,亦将「行」定义为「六思」,即「色思、声思、香思、味思、所触思、法思」[chunk:15303]。此外,《杂阿含经》指出,现前的五受阴是「本行所作、本所思愿」[chunk:5706],说明众生当下的生命状态是由过去的造作与愿力所决定的。 2. 行的本质属性与生动比喻 经典通过多种比喻与论述,深刻揭示了「行」的无常、虚妄与无我本质: - 芭蕉之喻与无我性:在《杂阿含经》中,佛陀将「行」比作芭蕉树(「诸行如芭蕉」)[chunk:5731, 5732]。芭蕉树层层剥落,最终并无坚实的树心;同样,「行」在「谛观思惟分别时,无所有、无牢、无实、无有坚固」[chunk:5731]。《大宝积经》亦使用此喻,指出芭蕉之性即是行之自性,其本质「本无有我」,亦无有情、命者、作者、受者等[chunk:16103]。 - 无常、苦与变易:《中阿含经》强调,世间没有任何「行」是常住不变、一向乐、恒久存的[chunk:2845]。无论是过去、未来还是现在的「行」,皆是无常、苦、变易之法[chunk:2847]。《杂阿含经》中著名的偈颂也总结道:「一切行无常,斯皆生灭法,虽生寻以灭,斯寂灭为乐」[chunk:13071]。 - 虚妄与和合实相:《大宝积经》进一步指出,「诸行悉无常」,且「都无有坚实,皆为虚伪妄失法」,犹如空花般虚妄[chunk:15866],其本质如幻[chunk:17869]。一切诸行「和合故生,彼不和合应知坏灭」[chunk:11553]。然而从实相而言,诸行「来无所从、去无所至」,因无来去故无生灭[chunk:16390],其自性「无有积集,一切皆寂静」[chunk:15095]。 3. 针对「行」的修行与解脱实践 针对「行」的执著与断除,直接关系到修行者的生死流转与涅槃解脱: - 执著带来的恐怖与魔缚:《中阿含经》指出,若比丘对「行」不离染、欲、爱、渴,欲得、求、著、住于「行」,并视「行」为我或我所有,当「行」发生变易时,其心便会产生恐怖、怖惧与烦劳[chunk:4269]。《杂阿含经》则将「行」斥为「结所系法」[chunk:5012]、「动摇」之魔缚[chunk:5016]、沉重的「重担」[chunk:5164]、乃至「无常盛火」[chunk:5485]、死法与断法[chunk:5391, 5393]。 - 不念、不愿、不受:修行者不应乐、欲、著、住于过去之行(不念过去)、未来之行(不愿未来)以及现在之行(不受现在法)[chunk:4307, 4317]。 - 七处善观察与离欲:《杂阿含经》详述了对「行」的「七处善」观察法,即如实知「行、行集、行灭、行灭道跡、行味、行患、行离」[chunk:5070, 5071]。其中,「行集」源于「触集」,「行灭」源于「触灭」,「行灭道跡」即是八圣道;「行味」是因行而生的喜乐,「行患」是行之无常、苦、变易,而「行离」则是对行的欲贪之调伏与断除[chunk:5067, 5071]。 - 厌离与寂灭解脱:多闻圣弟子应当破除对「行」的四种我见(不视「行」为我、不视「行」异我、不视「行」在我中、不视「我」在行中)[chunk:5343, 5344, 6604],将「行」思惟观察为「如病、如痈、如刺、如杀、无常、苦、空、非我」[chunk:7963, 7966]。通过修习四念处、八圣道、止观等方便,彻底断除对「行」的欲贪,对「行」产生厌离,因厌离而离欲,因离欲而得解脱,最终达到「一切行尽」、心善解脱的寂灭涅槃境界[chunk:2848, 2859, 5164, 5507, 5760]。 4. 菩萨之行与如来遍知 除了作为五蕴与因缘支的「行」外,《大宝积经》还探讨了实践意义上的「行」(行为与修行)。菩萨具足的「行」是指亲近善知识,以及修行布施、持戒、忍辱、精进、禅定、智慧方便等六度万行[chunk:18125]。同时,如来具有不可思议的「遍教行智力」,能如实了知众生种种不同的行相,如「苦乐二行」的迟速、由「简择力」或「修习力」所满之行、与贪瞋痴相应的「广惑相应行」,以及身语意业清净与否的流转及寂灭[chunk:15494, 15495]。 ### 三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异 在不同的经典和译本中,对于「行」及其所处的五蕴框架,存在着明显的术语和译名差异: 1. 五蕴与五阴的译名分歧: - 《中阿含经》在表述五蕴时,呈现出独特的译名形式,将「受」译为「觉」,因而将五蕴并列表述为「色、觉、想、行、识」[chunk:2640, 2845, 2847]。 - 《杂阿含经》则具有鲜明的时代特征,通常以「五阴」或「五受阴」来称呼「五蕴」[chunk:5105, 5127]。 - 《大宝积经》在论述时则较为兼容,既使用了「蕴」(如「蕴法善巧」、「蕴性」)[chunk:16103],也使用了「阴」(如「阴界诸入」)[chunk:18996]的表述。 2. 「行」在因缘与定义上的用词差异: - 在定义「行」的心理本质时,《杂阿含经》将其表述为「六思身」(眼触生思至意触生思)[chunk:5067, 5071];而《大宝积经》则直接表述为「六思」(色思至法思)[chunk:15303]。 - 在因缘链条中,《中阿含经》常用「因无明便有行」(或「缘无明有行」)及「因行便有识」(或「缘行有识」)[chunk:2629, 4715, 4717, 4718];《杂阿含经》则多用经典的「无明缘行,行缘识」[chunk:5842, 5861, 6010];《大宝积经》则表述为「无明若有则有假行」、「行若是有则有假识」[chunk:15303]。 ### 四、 与相关概念的关系 1. 与无明、识的因缘关系:行在十二因缘中扮演承前启后的核心角色。行是以无明为因、为习而生起的,即「无明缘行」;当无明熄灭时,行也随之熄灭[chunk:2629, 4475, 4715, 4718, 5842, 5861, 6010]。同时,行又是识生起的条件,即「行缘识」;若行熄灭,则识也随之熄灭[chunk:2629, 4715, 4717, 5842, 6024]。此外,业、烦恼、有、爱、见、慢、无明等是生起「行」的温床;若断除这些烦恼,则「行」亦随之熄灭[chunk:8008]。对于凡夫而言,由于无明触生爱,缘爱而生起「见色是我」等执着,这种执着本身即是「行」[chunk:5110]。 2. 与触的关系:行的集起与消灭直接依持于触。如《杂阿含经》指出,「行集」源于「触集」,「行灭」源于「触灭」[chunk:5067, 5071]。 3. 与想、识等其他蕴的独立性与关联性:《大宝积经》指出,在诸法无超转的实相中,各蕴性各异,「想于行中不得转入,行于想中不得转入」,体现了诸法不相混淆的独立性[chunk:18996]。同时,行与受、觉、想、思等同为「识之作用」,且若没有身体,则「识受想行皆悉不现」,显示了其对色身与心识的依持关系[chunk:19206]。 ### 五、 代表性原文引用 1. 《中阿含经》:「行有三种,身行、口行、意行。」[chunk:2629] 2. 《杂阿含经》:「一切行无常,斯皆生灭法,虽生寻以灭,斯寂灭为乐。」[chunk:13071] 3. 《大宝积经》:「诸行悉无常,都无有坚实,皆为虚伪妄失法。」[chunk:15866]

By Sutra

T0026 · 阿含部

在《T0026》中,对五蕴之一的“行”进行了系统而深刻的论述。该经在术语使用、因缘关系、无常本质以及解脱实践等方面,对“行”做出了解释。 ### 一、 独特的术语形式与五蕴表述 在本经中,通常所说的五蕴(色、受、想、行、识)呈现出独特的译名形式。经中将“受”译为“觉”,因而将五蕴并列表述为“色、觉、想、行、识”[chunk:2640, chunk:2845, chunk:2847]。在论述“行”的无常与非我时,皆是在“色、觉、想、行、识”这一特定的五蕴框架下展开的[chunk:2847, chunk:2859]。 ### 二、 “行”的定义与分类 经中对“行”的内涵进行了明确的分类。当尊者大拘絺罗回答舍梨子的提问时,指出“行”有三种,即:“身行、口行、意行”,如实了知这三种行即是“知行如真”[chunk:2629]。 ### 三、 “行”在因缘法中的核心位置 本经详细阐明了“行”在十二因缘链条中的前后因果关系: 1. 行与无明的关系(行的集与灭):行是以无明为因、为习而生起的。经中指出“因无明便有行”(或“缘无明有行”);当无明熄灭时,行也随之熄灭,即“无明灭行便灭”(或“无明灭则行灭”)[chunk:2629, chunk:4475, chunk:4715, chunk:4718]。 2. 行与识的关系:行是识生起的条件。经中表述为“因行便有识”(或“缘行有识”);若行熄灭,则识也随之熄灭,即“行灭识便灭”(或“行灭则识灭”)[chunk:2629, chunk:4715, chunk:4717]。 3. 行的四谛观:比丘若能如实知行、知行习(因无明)、知行灭(无明灭)、知行灭道(即八支圣道:正见乃至正定),便能成就正见,于法得不坏净,入正法中[chunk:2629]。 ### 四、 “行”的无常、苦、非我特质 经文通过佛陀与比丘、国王的问答,反复强调了“行”的本质属性: 1. 无常与变易:世间没有任何“行”是常住不变、一向乐、恒久存的[chunk:2845]。无论是过去、未来还是现在的“行”,皆是无常、苦、变易之法[chunk:2847]。 2. 非我与慧观:对于一切“行”(无论是过去、未来、现在,内、外,粗、细,好、恶,近、远),多闻圣弟子都应当以智慧如实观察:“彼一切非我,非我所,我非彼所”[chunk:2847, chunk:2859]。 ### 五、 针对“行”的修行与解脱 针对“行”的执著与厌离,直接关系到修行者的解脱: 1. 执著带来的恐怖:若比丘对“行”不离染、欲、爱、渴,欲得、求、著、住于“行”,并视“行”为我或我所有,那么当“行”发生变易时,其心便会产生恐怖、怖惧与烦劳[chunk:4269]。 2. 不念、不愿、不受:修行者不应乐、欲、著、住于过去之行(不念过去)、未来之行(不愿未来)以及现在之行(不受现在法)[chunk:4307, chunk:4317]。 3. 厌离与解脱:多闻圣弟子若能如实观察,便会对“行”产生厌离;因厌离而离欲,因离欲而得解脱,最终证得阿罗汉,不受后有[chunk:2848, chunk:2859]。

T0099 · 阿含部

在本经(《T0099》)中,“行”作为五阴之一,得到了系统而深刻的阐述。本经在译词上具有鲜明的时代特征,通常以“五阴”或“五受阴”来称呼“五蕴”[chunk:5105, 5127]。 首先,本经对“行”作出了明确的定义。在“七处善”的教示中,佛陀指出:“云何行如实知?谓六思身——眼触生思,耳、鼻、舌、身、意触生思,是名为行”[chunk:5067, 5071]。这表明“行”的核心在于“思”(意向、造作、意志),即由六种感官接触(触)而引发的六种意念活动。此外,本经也指出五受阴是“本行所作、本所思愿”[chunk:5706],说明现前的生命状态是由过去的造作与愿力所决定的。 其次,本经通过生动的比喻揭示了“行”的本质。佛陀将“行”比作芭蕉树(“诸行如芭蕉”)[chunk:5731, 5732]。芭蕉树层层剥落,最终并无坚实的树心;同样,“行”在“谛观思惟分别时,无所有、无牢、无实、无有坚固”[chunk:5731]。经中著名的偈颂也总结道:“一切行无常,斯皆生灭法,虽生寻以灭,斯寂灭为乐”[chunk:13071],强调了“行”作为有为法,具有瞬息生灭、无常变易的特征。 在缘起(因缘法)的框架下,“行”扮演着承前启后的关键角色。本经反复申明“无明缘行,行缘识”的经典链条[chunk:5842, 5861, 6010]。无明是“行”的因与集,而“行”又是“识”的因与集[chunk:5842, 6024]。对于凡夫而言,由于无明触生爱,缘爱而生起“见色是我”等执着,这种执着本身即是“行”[chunk:5110]。此外,本经还指出,业、烦恼、有、爱、见、慢、无明等是生起“行”的温床;若断除这些烦恼,则“行”亦随之熄灭[chunk:8008]。 为了引导弟子走向解脱,本经详细阐述了对“行”的“七处善”观察法,即如实知“行、行集、行灭、行灭道跡、行味、行患、行离”[chunk:5070, 5071]。其中,“行集”源于“触集”,“行灭”源于“触灭”,“行灭道跡”即是八圣道;“行味”是因行而生的喜乐,“行患”是行之无常、苦、变易,而“行离”则是对行的欲贪之调伏与断除[chunk:5067, 5071]。 在修持实践中,圣弟子应当破除对“行”的四种我见,即:不视“行”为我、不视“行”异我(我拥有行)、不视“行”在我中、不视“我”在行中[chunk:5343, 5344, 6604]。本经将“行”斥为“非我所应”之法,劝诫弟子“宜速断除”[chunk:5008];又将其视为“结所系法”[chunk:5012]、“动摇”之魔缚[chunk:5016]、沉重的“重担”[chunk:5164]、乃至“无常盛火”[chunk:5485]、死法与断法[chunk:5391, 5393]。修行者应当将“行”思惟观察为“如病、如痈、如刺、如杀、无常、苦、空、非我”[chunk:7963, 7966],通过修习四念处、八圣道、止观等方便,彻底断除对“行”的欲贪,从而达到“一切行尽”、心善解脱的寂灭涅槃境界[chunk:5164, 5507, 5760]。

T0310 · 寶積部

在《T0310》中,“行”这一概念呈现出多维度的义理,既指代作为五蕴(或五阴)之一的造作与迁流,也指代十二因缘中的“行”支,以及众生与菩萨的种种行为、修行。 首先,在五蕴/五阴的框架下,本经对“行”的特质进行了深入剖析: 1. 芭蕉之喻与无我性:世尊将“行”比喻为“芭蕉”,指出芭蕉之性即是行之自性,其本质“本无有我”,亦无有情、命者、作者、受者等 [chunk:16103]。 2. 互不转入的独立性:在诸法无超转的实相中,各蕴性各异,其中“想于行中不得转入,行于想中不得转入”,体现了诸法不相混淆的特质 [chunk:18996]。 3. 依身而显与识之作用:经中指出,若没有身体,则“识受想行皆悉不现”;同时,“行”与受、觉、想、思等同为“识之作用” [chunk:19206]。 4. 译名术语:本经在论述五蕴时,既使用了“蕴”(如“蕴法善巧”、“蕴性”) [chunk:16103],也使用了“阴”(如“阴界诸入”) [chunk:18996] 的表述。 其次,作为十二因缘之一,“行”被赋予了具体的心理学定义: 1. 定义为“六思”:经中明确指出,“云何为行?所谓色思声思香思味思所触思法思,是名为行” [chunk:15303]。 2. 因缘依持:行是虚假建立的,依无明而起(“无明若有则有假行”),同时又是识的依持(“行若是有则有假识”) [chunk:15303]。 第三,关于一切有为之“行”的迁流与实相: 1. 无常与虚妄:经中强调“诸行悉无常”,且“都无有坚实,皆为虚伪妄失法”,犹如空花般虚妄 [chunk:15866],其本质如幻 [chunk:17869]。 2. 和合生灭与无来去:一切诸行“和合故生,彼不和合应知坏灭” [chunk:11553]。然而从实相而言,诸行“来无所从、去无所至”,因无来去故无生灭 [chunk:16390]。 3. 寂静无积集:诸行的自性“无有积集,一切皆寂静”,了知此理被称为“有为三昧” [chunk:15095]。 最后,经中还探讨了众生与菩萨的“行”(行为与修行): 1. 菩萨之行:菩萨具足的“行”是指亲近善知识,以及修行布施、持戒、忍辱、精进、禅定、智慧方便等六度万行 [chunk:18125]。 2. 如来对众生诸行的遍知:如来具有不可思议的“遍教行智力”,能如实了知众生种种不同的行相,如“苦乐二行”的迟速、由“简择力”或“修习力”所满之行、与贪瞋痴相应的“广惑相应行”,以及身语意业清净与否的流转及寂灭 [chunk:15494, chunk:15495]。

Related