Dharma · AI Companion

斯陀含果

sakṛdāgāmi-phala

一来圣者所证的修行果位AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

通途立于声闻断惑证真之第一重;金刚经以「名一往来而实无往来」作无所得之正面重释,升至第二重。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

Among the four fruits of the śrāvaka path of liberation (the four *sāmañña-phala*: stream-enterer, once-returner, non-returner, and arhat), the once-returner fruit (Sanskrit: *Sakṛdāgāmin-phala*) is the second stage, also translated as "the fruit of one more return" or "the fruit of a single return" [7369, 7827].

To clarify the once-returner fruit, we must precisely reconstruct how the classical canon defines its standard of cutting off defilements and its place in the process of liberation:

1. Core Definition: The Standard of Cutting Off Defilements

The most authoritative definition of the once-returner fruit in the canon is: "The three fetters have been exhausted (cut off); greed, aversion, and delusion are attenuated (lust, anger, and delusion are weakened)" [4700, 7828]. This contains two distinctly different levels that must not be blurred together: * "Cutting off the three fetters": This refers to the complete eradication of self-view (*satkāya-dṛṣṭi* — the view that the five aggregates constitute a real, eternal self), attachment to rites and rituals (*śīlavrata-parāmarśa* — the mistaken view that observances of meaningless taboos or non-Buddhist ascetic practices can lead to liberation), and doubt (*vicikitsā* — hesitation and uncertainty regarding the Buddha, the Dharma, the Saṅgha, and the Four Noble Truths). This portion is the work already completed at the stage of stream-entry (the first fruit). * "Greed, aversion, and delusion are attenuated": This is the core marker distinguishing the once-returner from the stream-enterer. "Attenuated" means that while craving for the five sensual pleasures (form, sound, smell, taste, touch), aversion (anger/resentment) when encountering adversity, and deeply rooted subconscious delusion (ignorance) have not yet been completely eradicated (that being the sphere of the non-returner, the third fruit, and the arhat, the fourth fruit), the intensity of these defilements' impulses and the frequency of their eruption have already been greatly weakened and thinned [4700, 7828].

2. The Process of Liberation: The Trajectory of Life

On the trajectory of *saṃsāra* (birth and death), the stream-enterer is said to have "at most seven more returns between heaven and the human realm" [4700]. At the stage of the once-returner, because the defilements have been greatly weakened, the momentum toward liberation is extremely powerful, and the life trajectory is shortened to "one more return between heaven and the human realm" (or, as the *Saṃyukta-āgama* puts it, "one more coming to this world") [4700, 15595]. This means: one who has attained this fruit, after the present life ends, need only return once more between the heavenly realms and the human realm before completely cutting off the edge of suffering ( "the final end of suffering" ), attaining full liberation [4700, 15595].

3. The Path of Practice: How to Advance from the First Fruit?

The canon clearly states that the once-returner fruit is not obtained by luck out of thin air. For one who has already attained stream-entry, there are several highly practical paths of practice for "advancing" to the once-returner fruit: * Deep contemplation of the "five aggregates of clinging" (the five *upādāna-skandha*): The *Saṃyukta-āgama* states that the stream-enterer should diligently contemplate the five aggregates of clinging (form, feeling, perception, volition, consciousness) as "disease, a boil, a dart, a murder, impermanent, suffering, empty, and not-self" [5702]. * **Cultivating *śamatha-vipaśyanā* and *ānāpāna-sati* (mindfulness of breathing)**: Building meditative concentration through breath meditation (*ānāpāna-sati*), combined with the dual practice of tranquility and insight, to weaken the coarse stickiness of sensual desire and aversion [7859, 8125]. * Advancement in ordinary household life (for lay practitioners): The canon records that a lay practitioner who can observe the precepts on uposatha days, give alms according to one's means, and possess the pure qualities of "superior faith, good moral conduct, much learning, and generosity," along with right view, right intention, and other pure virtues, can — even while afflicted with serious illness (as with the young noble *Cūḷa* cultivating the "six perceptions of clear knowing," or the Śākya Sāra cultivating the "five joyous abodes") — attain the Buddha's confirmation or self-confirmation in this very life ("self-attesting to the once-returner fruit") [2600, 2601, 10520, 10522, 11005].


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

To avoid reducing "the attenuation of greed, aversion, and delusion" to some vague moral cultivation, let us use the most familiar scenarios of modern life — scrolling through one's phone late at night, being slighted at work, arguments in intimate relationships — to conduct a layer-by-layer psychological walkthrough, comparing the subtle differences among the ordinary person, the stream-enterer, and the once-returner (the second fruit):

Scenario One: Scrolling Short Videos / Shopping Apps Late at Night (Facing "Greed")

* The ordinary person: Unconsciously scrolling until two in the morning, the algorithm continuously pushing sensational or consumer content. A strong sense of possessiveness or stimulation (greed) arises in the mind. Behavior is completely taken over by desire. The next day there is regret, but it recurs repeatedly. * The stream-enterer (srotāpanna): View has already been broken (the view of no-self), knowing that "this 'I' scrolling through videos is merely a temporary aggregation of form, feeling, perception, volition, and consciousness." There is deep faith in the Dharma, and no belief that lasting happiness exists in the feeling of pleasure. However, because the inertia of desire (greed) is still present, they may still scroll into the night, all the while clearly seeing themselves suffering. * The once-returner (sakṛdāgāmin): The effect of "attenuated greed" manifests. When the algorithm pushes stimulating images, the "stickiness" in the depths of the mind that gets hooked by desire has become thinner. Desire has just begun to sprout, like water poured onto a Teflon-coated pan — it cannot cling. They may glance at it a couple of times and naturally put down the phone to sleep, without needing a grueling battle of willpower.

Scenario Two: Being Betrayed by a Colleague at Work or Being Publicly Rebuked by a Supervisor (Facing "Aversion/Anger")

* The ordinary person: Anger (aversion) instantly surges to the top of the head, the mind goes blank, falling into a victim narrative of "how dare they treat me like this" (self-view), followed by an outburst of conflict or months of dark vengeful scheming. * The stream-enterer: Does not fall into wrong views, able to immediately recognize that "aversion is suffering, impermanent," but the physiological storm of emotion (racing heartbeat, tight chest) is still intense, requiring considerable time to calm down through rationality or contemplation. * The once-returner: The effect of "attenuated aversion" manifests. In the moment of being rebuked, the physiological reaction still occurs, but the flame is extremely faint — like lighting wet firewood, which smokes briefly and then goes out. They can disengage from the emotion extremely quickly, see the other person's anxiety and limitations, and even generate empathy.

Scenario Three: Facing Illness and Death (As with the Young Noble Cūḷa and the Śākya Sāra in the Classical Sources)

* The most common way people misproject: Thinking that one who has attained the fruit is like a stone with no neurological response, or that one must retreat deep into the mountains to attain the fruit. * The actual projection: In the classical scriptures, the young noble Cūḷa and the Śākya Sāra are both lay practitioners afflicted with serious illness [10520, 10522]. While their bodies endure intense pain, they rely on the "four unbreakable confidences" (firm faith in the truth) and contemplate that "all conditioned things are impermanent, suffering, empty, and not-self" [10520]. The physical suffering of the body (disease, boil, dart) remains, but because of the "attenuated delusion" within the mind, there is no longer any secondary psychological trauma piled on top — no "why does it have to be me who is sick" — and thus, even on the sickbed, one can "self-attest to the once-returner fruit" [10520, 10522].


Why Contemporary People Need It

In contemporary society, people often find themselves caught in the gap between two extremes: On one end is anxious perfectionism — hoping to cut off all defilements overnight, and once one discovers that one still gets angry or still has desires, falling into deep self-condemnation; On the other end is thoroughgoing nihilism — believing that "human beings are merely products of desire," and since it cannot be eradicated, one might as well submit to desire and pursue immediate gratification.

The place of the once-returner fruit on the path of liberation offers contemporary people an extremely stable and pragmatic "ladder perspective":

1. It acknowledges that the weakening of defilements is a gradual process: From the stream-enterer's "seeing the path" (a complete reversal in view, cutting off the three fetters) to the once-returner's "cultivating the path" (grinding greed, aversion, and delusion thin, bit by bit, at the level of habit and emotion), Buddhism displays an extremely rigorous psychological logic of progression. It tells us: there is no need to fantasize about instantly becoming a saint free of all desires. As long as you build on the foundation of correct view, and through tranquility-and-insight meditation and the keeping of precepts and giving in daily life, you cause the "toxicity" and "density" of the defilements to decrease (greed, aversion, and delusion attenuated) — that itself is a tremendous advance in life [4700, 7828, 11005].

2. A mirror for contemporary science and algorithmic life: Contemporary neuroscience has found that the brain's neuroplasticity allows habitual emotional circuits (such as anxiety and rage) to undergo physical changes through long-term mindfulness training (similar to contemplating the five aggregates of clinging and breath meditation) — the excitability of neuronal connections decreases, and the amygdala's response weakens. This has a certain correspondence at the phenomenal level with the description of "greed, aversion, and delusion attenuated." *However, note its limitations*: The goal of contemporary neuroscience or cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is typically "emotional regulation" or "adapting to social life," which essentially remains about improving mental health; whereas the "attenuation of greed, aversion, and delusion" in the once-returner fruit is built upon the precondition of completely cutting off "self-view (the clinging to a self)," and its ultimate aim is to sever birth-and-death and attain complete liberation (*the final end of suffering*) [4700, 15595]. Science can explain changes in neurotransmitters, but it cannot replace the profound direct realization of "impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and not-self" [5702].


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: Equating "the Attenuation of Greed, Aversion, and Delusion" with Ordinary Good Temper or Moral Cultivation

* Clarification: A person with a good temper in the secular world may be so because of a weak character or fear of conflict (which belongs to "delusion" or "fear"), or because they are forcibly repressing emotions out of politeness and cultivation. A repressed volcano always erupts eventually, and the underlying "self-view" (the belief that there is an 'I' being wronged) has not been cut off. The "attenuation of greed, aversion, and delusion" in the once-returner fruit must be premised on "the three fetters having been cut off" [4700, 7828]. It is because one has profoundly seen that the five aggregates are empty and no self is to be found, so desire and anger have lost their foundation for attachment, and naturally become thin — it is absolutely not forced endurance or worldly pretense.

Misreading Two: Thinking "One More Coming to This World" Means Falling Back to the State of an Ordinary Person

* Clarification: Some people see "one more return between heaven and the human realm" and mistakenly think that one who has attained the second fruit will still get lost in the six realms like an ordinary person, or even fall into the three lower destinies. In fact, from the moment one attains the first fruit of stream-entry, one will never again fall into the three evil destinies (hell, hungry ghosts, animals). The "one more return" of the once-returner fruit means that, because of the residual thin greed, aversion, and delusion, their life energy still needs to transition once between the two pure good destinies of heaven and the human realm [4700]. This one return is their final finishing touch of liberation in the world. Once this life ends, they go straight to ultimate nirvāṇa (attaining the end of suffering) [4700, 15595].

Misreading Three: Thinking That Attaining the Fruit Requires Ordination, and Lay Practitioners Cannot Achieve It

* Clarification: The classical canon preserves numerous records of lay practitioners attaining the once-returner fruit. For example, the elder Anāthapiṇḍada possessed superior faith, good moral conduct, much learning, and generosity [2600]; the young noble Cūḷa and the Śākya Sāra practiced while ill [10520, 10522]. The canon clearly records that a lay practitioner who can observe the precepts on uposatha days, give alms and cultivate merit, and diligently contemplate the five aggregates of clinging and cultivate tranquility and insight in daily life, can likewise advance and accomplish the once-returner fruit [5702, 8125, 11005]. This provides clear and powerful support for the confidence of contemporary practitioners living amidst the dust of the world.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义 斯陀含果(sakṛdāgāmin-phala)又称「一往来」或「一来」,是佛教声闻四沙门果中的第二果。其核心特征是修行者在断除「三结」(我见、戒禁取见、疑)的基础上,使贪、嗔、痴(或称婬、怒、痴)等烦恼变得微薄。在解脱进程上,证得此果者只需在天上与人间往返一次(一往来或一来此世),便能彻底断除痛苦,证得究竟解脱。 二、主要阐述 在经典中,斯陀含果的断惑特征被明确界定为「三结断(或三结尽),贪、恚、痴薄」。在解脱进程上,证得此果者被称为「一往来天上人间」或「一来此世」,即在人天之间往返一次之后,便能「得苦边」或「究竟苦边」。 关于通往斯陀含果的修行方法,经典中指出了多条具体的实践路径: 第一,观五受阴。对于已经证得须陀洹果(初果)的修行者,若欲胜进证得斯陀含果,应当精勤思惟「五受阴」法,观其「为病、为痈、为刺、为杀、无常、苦、空、非我」。 第二,修习三十七道品与止观。多修习「四念处」或「七觉分」能证得斯陀含果;行持作为「沙门法」的「八圣道」(正见乃至正定)亦能成就此果;此外,修习「安那般那念」(出入息念)或「止、观」二法,能令修行者达到「三结尽,贪、恚、痴薄」而证果。 第三,居士的清净功德与胜进。在家的须陀洹果修行者,若能在斋日受持斋戒、随力惠施、修诸功德,能令其胜进成就斯陀含果。如舍梨子(舍利弗)指出,给孤独长者因具备「上信」、「善戒」、「多闻」、「惠施」,以及「善慧」、「正见」、「正志」、「正解」、「正脱」、「正智」等清净功德,不仅能灭除病苦,更能在此基础上证得斯陀含果或阿那含果。 第四,具体证果实例与「自记」。经典中记载了在家居士在重病时通过特定修持证果并获得佛陀印证(自记)的实例。例如,长寿童子在身患重病时,依止「四不坏净」(于佛、法、僧不坏净,圣戒成就),并修习「六明分想」(一切行无常想、无常苦想、苦无我想、观食想、一切世间不可乐想、死想),佛陀对其宣说「汝今自记斯陀含果」;释氏沙罗在疾病委笃之际,同样依止「四不坏净」,并修习「五喜处」(如念如来事、自所施法等),佛陀亦赞叹并印证其「自记斯陀含果」。 三、不同部类与译本的表述差异 在不同的经典及译本中,对于斯陀含果的名称、断惑特征及相关修行术语的表述存在细微差异: 首先,在解脱特征的表述上,《中阿含经》将其表述为「一往来天上人间」及「一往来已,便得苦边」;而《杂阿含经》则表述为「一来此世,究竟苦边」。 其次,在断惑特征的用词上,《中阿含经》采用「三结已尽,婬怒癡薄」;而《杂阿含经》则采用「三结断(或三结尽),貪、恚、癡薄」。 再者,在蕴界处的译名上,《杂阿含经》采用了独特的译名「五受阴」,指出应思惟「此五受阴法为病、为痈……」,而非其他经典中常见的「五蕴」或「五取蕴」。 最后,在证果的确认方式上,《杂阿含经》将修行者的自我确认或佛陀的印证表述为「自记」,如「自记斯陀含果」。 四、与相关概念的关系 第一,与须陀洹果(初果)的关系:须陀洹果是斯陀含果的修行基础。在断惑上,须陀洹果仅达到「三结已尽」,而斯陀含果在此基础上进一步达到「贪、恚、痴薄」。在生死流转上,须陀洹果是「极七往来天上人间」,而斯陀含果则缩短为「一往来天上人间」(或「一来此世」)。在修行路径上,已证得须陀洹果者,通过精勤思惟五受阴,或在斋日受持斋戒、随力惠施、修诸功德,即可胜进证得斯陀含果。 第二,与阿那含果(三果)的关系:斯陀含果是通往阿那含果的中间阶段。在居士修持清净功德(如上信、善戒、多闻、惠施及八正道相关法)时,其果报往往并提,即「或得斯陀含果,或得阿那含果」,或在斋戒修福时,能令修行者「得斯陀含果,或阿那含果」,显示了两者在胜进过程中的紧密相承。 五、代表性原文引用 《中阿含经》:「三結已盡,婬怒癡薄,得一往來天上人間,一往來已,便得苦邊。」 《杂阿含经》:「已證須陀洹果者,當復精勤思惟:此五受陰法為病、為癰、為刺、為殺、無常、苦、空、非我。」 《杂阿含经》:「三結斷,貪、恚、癡薄,名斯陀含果。」 《杂阿含经》:「汝今自記斯陀含果。」

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

本經——《中阿含經》——論及斯陀含果之處,出於尊者舍梨子探望病困之給孤獨長者時所說的一段慰問語。經文以「斯陀含果」之名稱此一來聖者所證之果位,並將其與阿那含果、須陀洹並列,三者作為可能達至之修行階位。

此段經文之獨特處,在於以「對比列舉」之方式論述此果位。舍梨子以十組對照——愚癡凡夫之「不信」對長者之「上信」,「惡戒」對「善戒」,「不多聞」對「多聞」,「慳貪」對「惠施」,「惡慧」對「善慧」,「邪見」對「正見」,「邪志」對「正志」,「邪解」對「正解」,「邪脫」對「正脫」,「邪智」對「正智」——逐一說明:凡夫因彼十過患而死後生地獄,長者則因反十功德而「或滅苦痛,生極快樂,因……故,或得斯陀含果,或阿那含果」。每一對照之後,模式皆同,呈高度平行、重複之句式。

值得注意的是,經文每次述及長者之功德時,皆在末句加上「長者本已得須陀洹」一句,指出長者已先證須陀洹果,斯陀含果、阿那含果乃其向上進趣之可能階位。此語法顯示斯陀含果在經中之定位:乃已得須陀洹之後、更高一層之果位。經文三果並列,斯陀含果居中,介於初果須陀洹與三果阿那含之間。

在術語形式上,本經使用「斯陀含果」此一音譯,未見意譯之替換名稱。三聖果之稱呼皆用音譯:須陀洹、斯陀含果、阿那含果。所列十種功德中,「善戒」「善慧」「正見」「正志」「正解」「正脫」「正智」等「正」字為首之語,與「七正」之概念相關;而「上信」「多聞」「惠施」則另有其名。經文未對此十項作進一步科判或定義,僅作為對長者功德之概括性描述。

綜觀此段,斯陀含果並非作為獨立之修行議題被闡述,而是嵌於一段臨終安慰之對話中,與上信、善戒、多聞、惠施、善慧、正見、正志、正解、正脫、正智等十種功德並列,作為長者臨終時可能證得之果位之一。經文重在以功德對照惡患,屢勸長者「莫怖」,故斯陀含果之出現,實為安慰、勉勵語境下之果位指向,而非系統性之果位論述。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論述「斯陀含果」(一來果)時,主要將其置於「四沙門果」或「四果」的框架中呈現,即與須陀洹果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果並列,為聖者所證的四種果位之一。

關於斯陀含果的具體內涵,《雜阿含經》以「三結斷,貪、恚、癡薄」加以界定。「三結」即身見、戒取、疑三種根本煩惱之繫縛,斯陀含果已斷此三結,然對貪、瞋、癡三毒僅「薄」而非永盡,故仍須於人間、天上再來受生一次(一來),方能究竟解脫。此一定義與同經對須陀洹果(僅三結斷)、阿那含果(五下分結盡)、阿羅漢果(貪恚癡永盡、一切煩惱永盡)的界定形成完整的階梯式對照。

關於證得斯陀含果的修行方便,《雜阿含經》提供了多元途徑:

其一,思惟五受陰。舍利弗與摩訶拘絺羅的對答中明確指出,已得須陀洹果證者,欲進求斯陀含果,應當精勤思惟「此五受陰法為病、為癰、為刺、為殺、無常、苦、空、非我」。值得注意的是,本經使用「五受陰」一詞,而非其他經常見之「五蘊」、「五陰」等譯名,此即此經特有的術語形式。

其二,廣修四念處。世尊告諸比丘:「於四念處多修習,當得四果,四種福利」,斯陀含果即為其中之一。

其三,多修七覺分。修習七覺分多修習已,亦得四種果,斯陀含果為其一。

其四,證八聖道。佛以「有沙門法及沙門果」立教,沙門法即八聖道(正見乃至正定),沙門果即四果,斯陀含果為其二。

其五,修安那般那念。經中明言修習安那般那念得大果大福利,能令「三結盡,貪、恚、癡薄,得斯陀含果」。

其六,修習止觀二法。佛告婆蹉:「有二法,修習多修習,所謂止、觀」,修二法故能令三結盡、貪恚癡薄,得斯陀含。

其七,依四不壞淨修習六明分想或五喜處。經中記載長壽童子依四不壞淨修六明分想(一切行無常想、無常苦想、苦無我想、觀食想、一切世間不可樂想、死想),佛即告其「汝今自記斯陀含果」;釋氏沙羅依四不壞淨修五喜處(念如來事乃至自所施法),佛亦言「汝今自記斯陀含果」。此二例顯示,斯陀含果可由在家居士於日常生活中修習而得,並非唯限於出家眾。

此外,於齋日修齋戒乃至八支,亦可成就斯陀含果或阿那含果。

綜合而言,《雜阿含經》對斯陀含果的論述具有以下特色:一、以「沙門果」統攝四果,並以「三結斷,貪、恚、癡薄」作為斯陀含果的簡明定義,於四果中處於過渡階位;二、列舉多種修行方便——從出世間的觀五受陰、修四念處、七覺分、八聖道,到通於世出世間的止觀、安那般那念,乃至居士的持齋修福——顯示其證得法門之多元;三、使用「五受陰」而非「五蘊」、「五陰」等譯名,此為本經的術語特點。

摩訶般若波羅蜜經T0223 · 般若部

《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》對「斯陀含果」的論述,貫穿「果位名號由來」、「世諦與第一義之別」、「般若觀下果皆如化」三個層面。

一、列為聲聞所行而非佛道

經中將斯陀含果與須陀洹果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果並列,統稱之為「聲聞所行」,明示此果「不能至薩婆若」。薩婆若即一切種智,唯有菩薩學般若波羅蜜方能成就。經文遂以「狗不從大家求食反從作務者索」、「欲見大海反求牛跡水」、「欲擬作帝釋勝殿而揆則日月宮殿」等多重譬喻,警誡得深般若波羅蜜者若棄本逐末、取聲聞辟支佛所應行經,當知是菩薩魔事。

二、世諦故說有果報,非第一義

就斯陀含果等是否實有,經採世諦與第一義二分。「世諦故,分別說有果報,非第一義」;於第一義中實無有相、無有分別亦無言說,色乃至有漏無漏法皆「不生不滅相、不垢不淨,畢竟空、無始空」。凡夫人不知二諦,故不當有諸果;唯有聖人知世諦、知第一義,有道有修道,方得「差別有諸果」。須菩提追問修道是否得果,佛答:「修道不得果,不修道亦不得果,亦不離道得果,亦不住道中得果」,顯示果位施設乃為度眾而立的假名,非實有所得。

三、各果具體定義

本經為各果位一一給出名相定義:「三結盡故名須陀洹」、「婬怒癡薄故名斯陀含果」、「五此間結盡故名阿那含果」、「五彼間結盡故名阿羅漢」、「所有集法皆滅散相故名辟支佛道」、「一切煩惱習斷故名阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」。可見斯陀含果之特質,在於婬、怒、癡三毒已轉薄而未斷盡,仍須一來受生,方證涅槃,故名「一來」。

四、以般若觀之,果皆如化

再進一步,須菩提問斷煩惱所證之果(含斯陀含果)是否皆是變化。佛言:若有生滅相皆是變化;不生不滅者非變化,即「不誑相涅槃」。諸法平等,非聲聞、辟支佛、菩薩、諸佛所作;有佛無佛,諸法性常空,性空即是涅槃。為令新發意菩薩不驚怖,故分別說生滅者如化、不生不滅者不如化。意謂以第一義觀之,斯陀含果等諸果位皆屬有為生滅之法,究竟皆如幻化,唯有涅槃真實不虛。

五、用語特點

本經鳩摩羅什譯本一律使用「斯陀含果」一詞,並列諸果位亦以「X果」格式呈現;最高佛果用音譯「阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」,最高智慧用音譯「薩婆若」(即一切智)。這些皆為鳩摩羅什譯場之標準譯名,並無特別異譯。

Related