Dharma · AI Companion

沙門果

śrāmaṇya-phala

修出离道所证得的圣果AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Talking About

In contemporary culture, we are accustomed to clear progress metrics: key performance indicators (KPIs) at work, fitness tracker scores, or language proficiency levels. When people encounter Buddhist meditation, they often ask: *Is there an objective scale for spiritual awakening, or is it merely a vague, subjective feeling?*

The Buddhist concept of Śrāmaṇyaphala (沙門果 — Fruits of Recluseship) provides the definitive answer to this question. It is neither a poetic metaphor nor a mystical rank granted by an institution. Rather, it denotes the precise, verifiable stages of existential liberation achieved by a practitioner (a *śrāmaṇa* / 沙門) who follows the Buddha’s teaching.

To understand Śrāmaṇyaphala, one must first grasp the strict causal pairing established in the early scriptures: * Śrāmaṇya-dharma (沙門法 — The Cause/Path of Recluseship): This refers exclusively to the Noble Eightfold Path (八聖道 — *Ariya-aṭṭhaṅgika-magga*), spanning right view to right concentration. * Śrāmaṇya-phala (沙門果 — The Effect/Fruit of Recluseship): This refers to the four progressive stages of liberation resulting directly from walking that path.

The Buddha asserted with uncompromising clarity in the *Dīgha Nikāya* (*Long Discourses*) that only a path containing the Noble Eightfold Path can produce these four fruits. Where the Noble Eightfold Path is absent, the true fruits of liberation do not exist.

The system categorizes these outcomes into the Four Fruits of Recluseship (四沙門果), defined precisely by the specific mental fetters (*saṃyojana*) or defilements (*kilesa*) that are permanently severed:

1. Sotāpanna-phala (須陀洹果 — Fruit of Stream-Entry / First Fruit) * Diagnostic Criterion: The complete eradication of the Three Fetters (三結斷): * *Identity View* (身見/我見 — *sakkāya-diṭṭhi*): The fundamental delusion that a fixed, independent "self" exists within or owns the body and mind. * *Attachment to Rules and Rites* (戒禁取見 — *sīlabbata-parāmāsa*): The mistaken belief that external rituals, ascetic codes, or superstitious practices alone can lead to ultimate liberation. * *Skeptical Doubt* (疑結 — *vicikicchā*): Chronic, destabilizing uncertainty regarding the truth of reality, the Buddha's realization, the efficacy of the Dhamma, and the capability of the Saṅgha. * *Status*: A Stream-enterer has entered the "stream" leading to Nibbāna and will never fall into lower realms of suffering.

2. Sakadāgāmi-phala (斯陀含果 — Fruit of Once-Returning / Second Fruit) * Diagnostic Criterion: Severance of the Three Fetters, combined with the significant attenuation of greed, ill-will, and delusion (貪、恚、癡薄). * *Status*: Sensory desires and subtle angers still arise, but their intensity and power to enslave the mind are drastically reduced.

3. Anāgāmi-phala (阿那含果 — Fruit of Non-Returning / Third Fruit) * Diagnostic Criterion: The complete destruction of the Five Lower Fetters (五下分結盡): the original Three Fetters plus *Sensual Desire* (欲貪 — *kāmacchanda*) and *Ill-will/Aversion* (恚/瞋恚 — *byāpāda*). * *Status*: The practitioner is entirely free from sensory cravings and reactive anger or frustration. They will not be reborn in the sensory realm (*kāma-loka*).

4. Arahant-phala (阿羅漢果 — Fruit of Worthiness/Arahantship / Fourth Fruit) * Diagnostic Criterion: The absolute eradication of all greed, ill-will, and delusion (貪、恚、癡永盡) and the total destruction of all influxes/defilements (一切煩惱永盡). * *Status*: Complete, irreversible liberation (*Nibbāna*). All subtle conceits, restlessness, and fundamental ignorance are extinguished.

The Methods and Context of Realization

The scriptures do not treat these fruits as accidental epiphanies. They are realized through explicit cognitive and meditative disciplines: * Contemplation of the Five Aggregates of Clinging (五受陰/五蘊): Observing form, feeling, perception, mental formations, and consciousness as *a disease, a carbuncle, a thorn, a killer, impermanent, suffering, empty, and non-self* (病、為痈、為刺、為殺、無常、苦、空、非我). * Systematic Cultivation: Continually practicing the Four Foundations of Mindfulness (四念處 — *satipaṭṭhāna*) and the Seven Factors of Awakening (七覺分 — *bojjhaṅga*). * Hearing the True Dhamma (聽聞正法): Deep, attentive listening to the authentic teaching, which incubates insight and propels the mind from one fruit to the next.

Furthermore, early texts emphasize that Śrāmaṇyaphala carries immediate, visible benefits in this present life (沙門現得報). In ancient times, it elevated a person from societal servitude to dignity; in an existential sense, it grants immediate psychological sovereignty. Because these breakthroughs transform a person's relationship to existence, the classical discourses record that disciples—monastic and lay alike—who realized any of these fruits at a particular spot (whether sitting, standing, walking, or lying down) would hold that location in deep, lifelong recollection (憶念證果處所).


Walkthrough in Daily Life

To understand how Śrāmaṇyaphala functions, let us trace its diagnostic stages through the mundane, high-pressure experiences of modern life: commuting on packed public transit, navigating high-stakes corporate performance reviews, scrolling through targeted social media algorithms, and managing intimate or parenting conflicts.

``` [Unexamined Daily Mind] │ ▼ [ Stream-Entry (須陀洹果) ] ──► Eradicates: Identity View, Ritual Fetters, Doubt │ (Relates to work, metrics, and ego-defense) ▼ [ Once-Returning (斯陀含果) ] ──► Attenuates: Greed, Ill-will, Delusion │ (Relates to phone doomscrolling & impulse reactions) ▼ [ Non-Returning (阿那含果) ] ──► Eradicates: Sensual Craving & Aversion │ (Relates to relationship drama & sensory demands) ▼ [ Arahantship (阿羅漢果) ] ──► Eradicates: All Residual Defilements & Ego-Conceit (Absolute inner freedom in all circumstances) ```

Step 1: Mapping the First Fruit (須陀洹果 — Stream-Entry)

Imagine you are sitting in a modern open-plan office. A colleague publicly criticizes your quarterly project during a meeting, or an algorithm suddenly demotes your content engagement.

* Common Mismapping: Many modern practitioners assume that becoming a Stream-enterer means you feel no emotion, never get upset, and float through the office like a serene ghost. This is incorrect. A Stream-enterer can still feel annoyance or ambition. * The Authentic Mapping: What has permanently collapsed in a Stream-enterer is Identity View (我見), Attachment to Rules/Rites (戒禁取見), and Doubt (疑). * *Identity View*: When the criticism lands, the unexamined mind thinks: *"My worth is being attacked; MY identity is threatened."* The Stream-enterer beholds the sight, sound, feelings, and thoughts purely as impermanent, passing phenomena (the Five Aggregates). They see clearly that there is no solid "I" inside the performance score. * *Attachment to Rules and Rites*: The unexamined mind believes: *"If I just follow this exact morning routine, wear this specific energy crystal, or adopt this trendy lifestyle hack, I will achieve inner perfection."* The Stream-enterer recognizes these as superficial external setups, seeing that liberation comes strictly from seeing cause and effect through the Noble Eightfold Path. * *Doubt*: They no longer wonder helplessly whether peace is real or if the Dhamma works; they have tasted the reality of non-self firsthand.

Step 2: Mapping the Second Fruit (斯陀含果 — Once-Returning)

Now imagine late at night. You are exhausted after overtime, holding your smartphone. An algorithm serves up provocatively styled advertisements, rage-inducing news clips, or luxurious lifestyle flexes designed to trigger envy and impulse shopping.

* The Authentic Mapping: In the Once-Returner, greed, ill-will, and delusion are attenuated (貪、恚、癡薄). * The impulse to click, buy, or post a furious reply still stirs at a subtle level, but it lacks momentum. It is like a fire trying to catch on damp wood. The practitioner sees the surge of sensory desire or annoyance, but the pull is thin and transparent. The mind easily lets go within seconds without painful self-repression.

Step 3: Mapping the Third Fruit (阿那含果 — Non-Returning)

Consider a intense interpersonal drama—a bitter argument with a spouse, or severe noise pollution during an important rest period.

* The Authentic Mapping: The Non-Returner has completely severed the Five Lower Fetters (五下分結盡), which includes all sensual craving and aversion/ill-will. * When harsh words or sensory discomfort occur, the mechanism that turns physical sensation into emotional anger is entirely broken. There is zero surge of resentment, bitterness, or defensive rage. Similarly, sensory temptations (gourmet food, physical comforts) hold no magnetic pull. The mind rests in unshakeable, self-contained tranquility.

Step 4: Mapping the Fourth Fruit (阿羅漢果 — Arahantship)

Finally, picture navigating any extreme contemporary environment—a volatile stock market crash, a terminal diagnosis, or complete public praise and renown.

* The Authentic Mapping: The Arahant lives with all defilements permanently destroyed (貪、恚、癡永盡). * There is no subtle spiritual pride ("I am an enlightened person"), no existential restlessness (*uddhacca*), and no residual trace of fundamental ignorance (*avijjā*). Whether operating an advanced technology, walking through a quiet forest, or facing death, the Arahant’s mind remains perfectly unconditioned, luminous, and free.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Living in the digital age presents unique cognitive and emotional challenges. We are subjected to an unprecedented war for our attention, hyper-individualistic culture, and intense metric-driven anxiety. In this environment, the concept of Śrāmaṇyaphala offers crucial antidotes:

1. A Defense Against "Spiritual Commercialism" and Pseudo-Awakening

Today's wellness marketplace is saturated with vague promises of "mindfulness," "higher consciousness," or instant spiritual awakening sold through weekend retreats. The classical criteria of Śrāmaṇyaphala serve as a clear diagnostic framework. The scriptures warn against two specific types of practitioners: * The Gain-Seeking Recluse (求利沙門): Those who adopt spiritual language solely for wealth, reputation, or clout, lacking any genuine intent for inner renunciation (*renunciation of defilements*). * The Darnel Recluse (稗沙門): Practitioners who resemble real seekers outwardly (like weed grass matching wheat in a field) but violate core ethical precepts and harbor deep hypocrisy.

By anchoring spiritual progress in the definitive abandonment of specific fetters (such as identity view and ill-will) rather than extraordinary visions or charismatic performance, Śrāmaṇyaphala protects seekers from self-deception and predatory spiritual markets.

2. Clarity in the Age of AI and Neuroscience

As artificial intelligence models simulate human conversation and cognitive neuroscience maps the brain correlates of deep meditation (such as the down-regulation of the Default Mode Network during stillness), people often ask: *Can technology replicate or measure enlightenment?*

Here, the distinction is vital: * Neuroscience and AI can measure or simulate physical and behavioral states—heart-rate variability, neural synchronization, or optimized language output. * Śrāmaṇyaphala, however, refers to the radical, permanent unbinding (*visuddhi*) of latent psychological fetters (*saṃyojana*). A brainwave print can show calm focus, but it cannot measure whether the latent delusion of an enduring "self" (*sakkāya-diṭṭhi*) has been eradicated at the root.

Neuroscience offers helpful technical analogies for understanding state changes, but neural state changes are temporary conditioned phenomena. Śrāmaṇyaphala marks the unconditioned realization that transcends state fluctuations. Science tracks the machinery of the mind; Śrāmaṇyaphala defines the permanent liberation from the machine's trap.


Common Misconceptions and Clarifications

Misconception 1: "The Fruits of Recluseship are strictly for monastics living in isolated caves."

* Clarification: While the term *Śrāmaṇa* historically emphasized monastic recluseship, the early Buddhist texts explicitly document that laypersons (men and women) frequently achieved the first three fruits (*Sotāpanna*, *Sakadāgāmi*, and *Anāgāmi*). Furthermore, the directive to remember and honor the physical site of fruit attainment (憶念證果處所) applies equally to all seven categories of disciples: monks, nuns, novice monks, novice nuns, female probationers, laymen, and laywomen. Liberation is a function of understanding reality through the Noble Eightfold Path, not a function of external clothing.

Misconception 2: "All spiritual paths and meditation techniques lead to the same Four Fruits."

* Clarification: Modern syncretism often claims that "all roads lead to the top of the same mountain." However, classical Buddhist texts explicitly record the Buddha stating to Subhadda: *"In whatever teaching the Noble Eightfold Path is not found, there the first, second, third, and fourth fruits of recluseship are not found."* The Four Fruits are specifically defined by the eradication of identity view through the direct insight into the non-self (*anattā*) nature of the Five Aggregates—an insight unique to the Buddhadharma.

Misconception 3: "Attaining a Fruit means you suddenly lose all emotional warmth and become indifferent to the world."

* Clarification: The abandonment of ill-will and selfish attachment does not produce cold indifference. On the contrary, as defilements like anger, fear, and possessiveness dissolve, the mind's natural capacity for unlimited loving-kindness (*mettā*), compassion (*karuṇā*), and sympathetic joy (*muditā*) expands without friction. A practitioner who realizes these fruits becomes vastly more present, gentle, and capable of wise action, precisely because they are no longer consumed by ego-preservation.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

沙門果(梵語:śrāmaṇya-phala)是佛教修行者(沙门)通过修持佛法、断除烦恼所亲自证得的四种阶段性与终极性果位。在经典中,沙门果通常具体指代“四沙门果”,即:须陀洹果(预流果)、斯陀含果(一来果)、阿那含果(不还果)与阿罗汉果(无生果)。沙门果是出家修行者最核心的志求与修证目标,也是佛法不共于外道的独特解脱成就。


二、 主要阐述

1. 四种沙门果的断惑特征

根据经典的系统规范,修行者在证得不同的沙门果位时,其内心烦恼的断除状态有着严格的对应关系: * 须陀洹果:其核心特征为“三结断”(即断除我见、戒禁取见、疑结)。 * 斯陀含果:在“三结断”的基础上,进一步达到“贪、恚、痴薄”(贪嗔痴三种根本烦恼变得微薄)。 * 阿那含果:其特征为“五下分结尽”(或作“五下分结断”,即断除身见、戒取、疑、贪欲、嗔恚五种下界结缚)。 * 阿罗汉果:达到“贪、恚、痴永尽”(或作“贪欲永尽,嗔恚永尽,愚痴永尽”),并且“一切烦恼永尽”的究竟解脱状态。

2. 证得沙门果的修行途径

经典中指出了多种通往沙门果的修行方便与法门: * 八圣道:八圣道(正见乃至正定)是证得沙门果的唯一途径。佛陀强调,唯有持有八圣道的法中才会有四沙门果,因此唯独佛法中有此四果,外道异众则无。 * 思惟五受阴:修行者若欲依次证得四沙门果,应当精勤思惟“五受阴”法,观照其为“病、为痈、为刺、为杀、无常、苦、空、非我”。 * 修习四念处与七觉分:多修习“四念处”与“七觉分”,是获得四沙门果及四种福利的直接途径。 * 听闻正法:众生通过“闻法”得以证得四沙门果;听闻深妙法门不仅能使修行者获沙门果,还能令已得果者“转更增上”。

3. 现实果报、心态与证果障碍

* 现世果报(沙门报):修行不仅指向未来的圣果,出家修道者在当下即可获得免除奴役、受人恭敬迎请等现世利益,此即“现得沙门报”。 * 证果处所的忆念:修行者(无论出家五众或在家二众)若在某一处所证得四果中的任何一果,皆应尽其形寿常常忆念该证果处所。 * 未证果者的修行心态:未得沙门果的凡夫比丘在阿兰若处修行时,若遇虎狼等险境,应思惟已舍身命,修持慈悲,远离惊畏。 * 障碍证果的恶行:阻挠他人听法会使人因“不善心”而堕入恶道,无法证果;而“恶比丘”(心怀谄谀、为烦恼所害)、“求利沙门”(为名利修行而无寂灭离欲之心)以及“稗沙门”(破戒非梵行者),皆永远无法获得沙门果,甚至将堕入地狱。


三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同部类及经典的译本中,关于“沙门果”及相关修行的用词和归类存在以下差异: * 果位称呼:《長阿含經》常依序称其为“第一沙门果、第二、第三、第四沙门果”;而《雜阿含經》与《大寶積經》则多直接并列“须陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿罗汉果”之名。 * 法义归类与术语: * 《長阿含經》将“四沙门果”归纳为“四法”之一,并特别定义其为“四证法”(即通过修行应当亲自证得的四种法);在论述现世利益时,使用“沙门报”或“沙门现得报”。 * 《雜阿含經》将“沙门法”(指八圣道)与“沙门果”(指四果)并提对置;并将四沙门果又称为“四种福利”;在指代五蕴时,该经使用了特定术语“五受阴”。 * 《大寶積經》则常使用“离沙门果”、“未得沙门果”等对比性术语来界定修行者的不同状态。


四、 与相关概念的关系

* 与“八圣道”的关系:八圣道与沙门果是因果关系。八圣道为“因”(沙门法),沙门果为“果”(沙门果)。无八圣道即无沙门果。 * 与“五受阴/四念处/七觉分”的关系:这些法门是证得沙门果的具体修行方便。通过观照五受阴的无常、苦、空、非我,或多修习四念处、七觉分,修行者方能断除诸结,依次证入各沙门果。 * 与“闻法”的关系:闻法是证得沙门果的前提。遮止他人听法不仅断人法身慧命、阻碍其证得沙门果,自身亦会因此恶业堕入恶趣。


五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《長阿含經》: * “若無八聖道,則無第一沙門果,第二、第三、第四沙門果……外道異眾無沙門果。” * “云何四證法?謂四沙門果:須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果。” 2. 《雜阿含經》: * “何等為沙門果?謂須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果。” * “何等為沙門法?謂八聖道……何等為沙門果?謂三結斷,是名須陀洹果……貪、恚、癡永盡,是名阿羅漢果。” 3. 《大寶積經》: * “於正法中以信出家得沙門果,是名為難。……證須陀洹果乃至阿羅漢果,是名沙門果。” * “若有沙門求利……於佛法中無有一念寂滅離欲之心,況得沙門果。若有得者,無有是處。”

By SutraAI-generated

長阿含經T0001 · 阿含部

《長阿含經》論「沙門果」,核心表述集中於四種沙門果的列舉,並與八聖道、現得果報、聞法得果等義理交織呈現。

一、四沙門果的具體名目與分類架構

本經一貫以「四沙門果」並舉四果:須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果。 將「四沙門果」列為「四法」之一;、 將其歸入「四證法」,意謂此四果乃如實證得之法。其他層次的彙整中,亦屢以「五證法」並列「五無學聚」(無學戒聚、無學定聚、慧聚、解脫聚、解脫知見聚)以收攝最高證果。 此外, 提及「漏盡智證」為「如來、至真、等正覺」出世之本,標誌沙門果的究竟歸趣。

二、沙門果與八聖道的依存關係

記載佛陀臨涅槃前答須跋之問,明確指出:「若諸法中,無八聖道者,則無第一沙門果,第二、第三、第四沙門果。」「以諸法中有八聖道故,便有第一沙門果……第四沙門果。」並斷言「今我法中有八聖道,有第一沙門果……第四沙門果,外道異眾無沙門果。」此段確立沙門果以八聖道為前提,獨為佛法所有,外道所無。本經用「八聖道」一詞,未見其他異稱。

三、現法得報——沙門果的現世性

載阿闍世王問:「沙門現在修道,現得報不?」佛以王之舊僕剃髮著袈裟出家為喻,告以「此是現得沙門報也」,強調沙門果並非僅屬後世,亦可於現法親證。此以譬喻顯示沙門果的當下可獲性,將修道與現世果報直接連結。

四、聞法得果與遮法之罪

、 中,佛與露遮反覆討論:有人聞法應得四沙門果,若有人遮令勿聞,則聞者既不得果,亦不得生天;其遮者之心為不善心,當墮惡趣。經中以此層層設問,凸顯聞法對於成就沙門果的關鍵性,以及障礙他人聞法的嚴重過失。

五、獨特側面與用語

本經論沙門果,並非僅作靜態列舉,而是將其嵌入三脈絡:(一)以八聖道為因;(二)以現法證得為時節;(三)以聞法為緣。並透過層層分組(四法、四證法、五證法)反覆標舉,使四沙門果成為法數體系中反覆出現之要項。術語方面,本經用「八聖道」而非「八正道」,用「沙門果」而非其他異譯,四果名稱為須陀洹、斯陀含、阿那含、阿羅漢,皆與常見譯名一致。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》以多則篇幅反覆論說「沙門果」一詞,其論述核心可歸納如下:

一、沙門法與沙門果的對舉:本經數則經文皆以「有沙門法及沙門果」之句式並列二詞。經文明示:「沙門法」即八聖道——正見乃至正定;「沙門果」則為須陀洹果、斯陀含果、阿那含果、阿羅漢果。此一對舉關係顯示,沙門果乃修習沙門法(八聖道)所證得之果位,故「修出離道所證得的聖果」在本經中具體落實為「修八聖道所證之四果」。

二、四沙門果的總稱:另一則經文直接以「有四沙門果」標舉四果之名,亦有經文略去沙門法,徑稱「沙門果」而列四名。本經所列四果之名——須陀洹、斯陀含、阿那含、阿羅漢——皆沿用梵語音譯,未見意譯替換。

三、四果各自的界說:經文對四果各作界定,所用術語十分一致—— (1)須陀洹果:「三結斷」; (2)斯陀含果:「三結斷,貪、恚、癡薄」; (3)阿那含果:「五下分結盡」(一處作「五下分結斷」); (4)阿羅漢果:「貪、恚、癡永盡,一切煩惱永盡」。 值得注意的是,界定阿羅漢果時以「一切煩惱永盡」作總結性補充,明示阿羅漢果為最究竟之解脫。

四、沙門果與修行處所的關聯:本經末一則經文 提出一獨特側面——若比丘於某處經行、住處、坐處、臥處中得四沙門果中任何一果,彼比丘應盡其形壽常念彼處。此記錄將沙門果之證得與具體物理場所聯繫,並推及比丘尼、式叉摩尼、沙彌、沙彌尼、優婆塞、優婆夷各四人,顯示本經亦重視證果之場所因緣及在家出家各眾之普適性。

五、用語記錄:本經所用關鍵術語為「沙門法」、「沙門果」、「四沙門果」、「八聖道」、「三結」、「貪恚癡」、「五下分結」、「一切煩惱永盡」等,皆為當部一貫用語,未見其他異譯或別名。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》論「沙門果」,主要環繞「一法」修行之功用而展開。全文反覆出現一套固定句式作為核心表述:「當修行一法,當廣布一法;……便成神通,去(除)諸(眾)亂想,逮(獲)沙門果,自致涅槃」。「逮沙門果」與「自致涅槃」並列,可見本經將沙門之果與涅槃同列為修行之究竟歸趣。

本經所列「一法」共十項,依次為:念佛、念法、念眾/念僧、念戒、念施、念天、念休息、念安般、念身、念死。每一法門各以「正身正意,結跏趺坐,繫念在前,無有他想,專精念……」起說,段末皆作「便得具足,成大果報……獲沙門果,自致涅槃」,表明任一念門皆能直趣此果。其中短本用「念眾」,廣本用「念僧」,可見本經對同一法門於內部出現了兩種譯稱。

另有以「無放逸行」為一法之說,強調守護心念、不惱害眾生、修習賢聖八道品,可「得沙門果,至泥洹界(處)」。此處本經以「泥洹」譯涅槃,與其它段落所用「涅槃」並見,屬同義異譯。

本經對「沙門果」最為具體的分層,見於。此段先列「四沙門之樂」——二禪、三禪、四禪之定樂,及無苦無樂之護念清淨;接著明確開列沙門四果之階位:一、斷三結網,成須陀洹,不退轉法,必至滅度;二、斷三結,淫、怒、癡薄,成斯陀含,來至此世,必盡苦際;三、斷五下分結,成阿那含,於彼般涅槃,不來此世;四、有漏盡,成無漏心解脫、智慧解脫,現法中身作證。末以「修此先苦之法,後獲沙門四果之樂」作總結,將沙門之果與四禪之樂並提。

綜合而言,《增壹阿含經》之「沙門果」具雙重意涵:一泛指修行究竟所證之聖果,與涅槃同位;二專指須陀洹、斯陀含、阿那含、阿羅漢之四果階位。本經以「逮」「獲」為得果之動詞,以「自致涅槃」「至泥洹界」為得果之歸趣,係以「一法」架構貫穿全篇之獨特側面。

Related