Dharma · AI Companion

現在

pratyutpanna

当下已生而尚未灭的时际AI-generated

Type PhenomenaDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

三世实有(有部)与现在假有、时不可得(经部、中观)之诤为宗派分歧,属背景议题;时际名相本身不升跨度。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

這個概念在說什麼 (What Is "The Present" Talking About?)

In modern culture, "living in the moment" or "mindfulness" is often popularized as a simple wellness technique—an invitation to slow down, savor a cup of coffee, or feel the warmth of the sun. However, in classical Buddhist thought, the concept of the Present (*pratyutpanna*, 現在) occupies a far more radical and precise position in the path to liberation (*mokṣa*, 解脫).

In early canonical texts such as the *Madhyama Āgama* (*Mādhya-āgama*, 中阿含經) and Mahāyāna scriptures like the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*Dābǎojī Jīng*, 大寶積經), the Present (*pratyutpanna*) is defined not merely as a tick on a clock, but as the immediate, dynamic arising of phenomena and states of consciousness right now. Specifically, it refers to the moment-by-moment interaction of the six sense bases (*ṣaḍāyatana*, 六入處: eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and mind, along with their respective objects), present consciousness (*xiànzài shí*, 現在識), and the five aggregates (*pañca-skandha*, 五陰/五蘊: form, feeling/sensation, perception, mental formations, and consciousness).

To understand "the Present" through the Buddhist lens, we must break it down into three foundational levels defined in the canons:

1. The Dynamic Mechanics: Six Sense Bases and Present Consciousness

When eye meets form, or mind meets thought, a specific instance of awareness—"present consciousness" (*pratyutpanna-vijñāna*, 現在識)—arises. The *Madhyama Āgama* categorizes our interaction with this present moment into two distinct paths: * Clinging to the present (*受現在法*, *shòu xiànzài fǎ*): When contact occurs at the six sense bases, if the practitioner experiences delight, craving, and entanglement toward these momentary sensory presentations and present consciousness, they are trapped in "receiving/clinging to the present." * Non-clinging to the present (*不受現在法*, *bù shòu xiànzài fǎ*): When contact occurs, if the practitioner remains aware without generating craving, aversion, or attachment, they practice "non-clinging to the present."

2. The Micro-Process: The Five Aggregates (*Pañca-skandha*)

The *Madhyama Āgama* (in the dialogue with Venerable Luyi Qiangji / Lu-i Qiang-ji) uses a distinct translation for the five aggregates: Form (*rūpa*, 色), Sensation/Feeling (*vedanā*, translated in this text specifically as *jué*, 覺), Perception (*saṃjñā*, 想), Mental Formations/Volition (*saṃskāra*, 行), and Consciousness (*vijñāna*, 識). * Form (色): Physical objects and body senses present right now. * Sensation/Feeling (覺/受): The immediate raw tone of experience—pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral. * Perception (想): The cognitive tagging, naming, and recognition of the object. * Mental Formations (行): The volitional impulse, reaction, or intention toward the experience. * Consciousness (識): The primary cognitive awareness of the scene.

"Clinging to the present" means becoming attached to, abiding in, and desiring any of these five aggregates as they manifest right now (*生樂著、欲、著、住*). "Non-clinging" means observing them without attachment or lingering (*不樂、不欲、不著、不住*).

3. Ontological Reality: Lacking Solidity and Three Classic Metaphors

In the *Bhaddekaratta-gāthā* (跋地羅帝偈) of the *Madhyama Āgama*, the Buddha explicitly cautions: > "Regarding present phenomena, one should reflect upon them as they are; know that they have no solidity (*念無有堅強*), the wise awaken thus."

The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* elevates this insight to the ultimate truth of the "equality of the three times" (*三世悉平等*, past, present, and future), declaring that all three temporal dimensions are "ultimately unfindable/empty" (*究竟無所有*). To prevent practitioners from solidifying the present into a real, permanent refuge, the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* provides three precise classical metaphors for the non-solidity (*無堅牢*) of time: * **Like a Phantom (*如幻*)**: Like a magician's illusion, the present moment appears vividly to sense perception, yet possesses no underlying substance or independent reality. * **Like a Mirage (*如焰*)**: Like heat shimmer on a hot highway that lures a thirsty traveler toward illusory water, the present moment tricks the mind into grasping for solid satisfaction where none exists. * **Like an Echo (*猶如響*)**: Like a voice rebounding off a canyon wall, the present moment arises purely due to past conditions and disappears immediately, devoid of an internal controller.

Thus, the Buddhist "Present" is not a safe harbor to lock oneself into, but a fleeting, conditional stage where illusions arise—and where liberation must be realized through precise observation.


生活裡的走查 (Walkthrough in Daily Life)

To see how the classical definitions operate, let us map a common contemporary scenario—doomscrolling on a smartphone late at night after an exhausting work session—directly onto the canonical framework of the Present.

``` [Late Night Scenario: Doomscrolling on Social Media] ├─ Six Sense Bases Contact: Eye contacts screen light; Ear hears video audio; Mind processes news. ├─ Present Consciousness (現在識) arises. └─ The Five Aggregates (色、覺/受、想、行、識) deploy in real-time: ├─ Form (色): Blue light, thumbs touching glass, weary spine. ├─ Sensation/Feeling (覺): A prickle of anxiety or temporary spike of entertainment. ├─ Perception (想): "This news is terrible," "That post is ridiculous," "I am out of the loop." ├─ Mental Formations (行): Volition to flick the thumb upward again; urge to comment or refresh. └─ Consciousness (識): Primary awareness synthesizing the digital feed. ```

Mapping "Clinging to the Present" (*受現在法*) vs. "Non-Clinging" (*不受現在法*)

1. Where Mismapping Occurs (The Common Trap): Modern self-help often advises: *"Just focus on the smartphone screen right now! Feel your thumb touching the glass! Enjoy the present moment of reading this video!"* * The Error: This mistakes sensory engagement/indulgence for Buddhist presence. In canonical terms, immersing oneself in the current sensation, enjoying the emotional rush, and staying hooked (*樂著、欲、著、住*) is precisely the definition of Clinging to the Present (*受現在法*). You are trapped in the current aggregate of feeling (*覺/受*) and mental formation (*行*).

2. The Classical Path of Observational Clarity: * **Observing the Non-Solidity (*念無有堅強*)**: Instead of getting sucked into the outrage of an online video, you notice the three characteristics in real-time: * *Like a Phantom (*如幻*)*: The digital outrage looks terrifyingly solid, but it is just light patterns and pixel triggers flickering on a screen. * *Like a Mirage (*如焰*)*: The promise that "one more swipe will give me rest or closure" is a mirage lure. * *Like an Echo (*猶如響*)*: The urge to scroll (mental formation / *行*) is merely an automatic echo of fatigue and past stress habits bouncing off the mind. * **Observing Faults in the Present (*現前見身過*)**: The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* highlights that the present moment is used to gain the "wisdom eye" (*智慧眼*) by recognizing one's own underlying operational faults (*現前見身過*)—for instance, noticing how greed (*rāga*) for stimulation or fear (*dveṣa*) of missing out drives the thumb to keep swiping. * **Executing Non-Clinging (*不受現在法*)**: Seeing form as form, sensation as sensation, and impulse as impulse, the mind refrains from building a narrative around them. There is no desire (*不欲*), no attachment (*不著*), and no lingering (*不住*). The thumb pauses; the phone is put down.


當代人為什麼需要它 (Why Modern People Need It)

Contemporary life in the digital age suffers from a unique temporal illness. We are caught between two distinct psychological traps: anticipatory anxiety driven by predictive algorithms and a hyper-commodified "mindfulness industry."

1. Beyond the Trap of Algorithmic Trajectory

Modern algorithmic architectures (feed recommendations, generative AI predictions, continuous notifications) are designed to hijack human attention by constantly linking the present moment to the *next* instant. We are perpetually pushed out of the present into future expectations or past regrets.

By applying the canon's insight—"knowing the three types of karma in present, future, and past" (*能知三種業,現未及過去*)—we regain autonomy. We realize that our present attention is the only locus where karmic cause-and-effect can be re-directed. The past is already gone; the future is unformed. The Present is the precise operational nexus where habit patterns (*saṃskāra*) can be intercepted.

2. De-solidifying "The Now"

Modern pop-psychology often turns "the now" into a solid, sacred object: *"The past doesn't exist, the future doesn't exist, only the present is real!"* This leads to subtle despair when the "now" happens to be full of physical pain, grief, or boredom.

The Buddhist insight that the present is **"ultimately unfindable" (*究竟無所有*) and "lacking in solidity" (*無有堅強*)** brings immense emotional relief. If the current moment of panic, sadness, or stress is *like a phantom, a mirage, and an echo*, you do not need to fight it, nor do you need to grasp and preserve it. It arrives due to prior causes, flickers momentarily, and dissolves naturally. Understanding its unfindable nature prevents us from turning "living in the moment" into another stressful performance goal.

3. Dialogue with Contemporary Cognitive Science and AI

In cognitive neuroscience, theories such as *predictive processing* suggest that the brain constantly generates top-down predictions about sensory inputs, creating a constructed model of "now." Similarly, AI generative models predict the next most likely token based on prior sequences.

These scientific models parallel the Buddhist insight into how the five aggregates construct our subjective world moment-by-moment. However, a critical distinction remains: * Scientific Limit: Neuroscience and AI describe the *functional mechanism* of cognitive construction. Science analyzes *how* sensory data is synthesized, but it does not inherently offer an ethical or spiritual path to eradicate suffering (*duḥkha*). Furthermore, whether neuroscientific models fully explain consciousness remains an unresolved debate. * Buddhist Scope: Buddhist teachings on *pratyutpanna* are explicitly soteriological—focused entirely on liberation. Canonical texts do not analyze the present to build a cognitive theory for its own sake, but to cultivate the "wisdom eye" (*智慧眼*), cut through self-deception, and end craving and attachment (*tanhā*).


常見誤讀與澄清 (Common Misconceptions and Clarifications)

誤讀一:把「不著現在」看作「麻木不仁」或「逃避當下」

*Misconception 1: Mistaking "Non-Clinging to the Present" for Apathy or Avoidance.* * Clarification: Some assume that if the present is "unsolidd" (*無有堅強*) and "unfindable" (*究竟無所有*), one should ignore present responsibilities or turn off emotional responsiveness. * Canonical Correction: Non-clinging (*不受現在法*) does not mean sensory numbness or ignoring real-world tasks. The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* explicitly links wisdom to **"seeing one's own faults right now" (*現前見身過*)**. True presence requires acute, hyper-clear observation of sensory contact and mental motives. You are fully aware of what is happening, but you do not allow the mind to construct craving (*樂著*), aversion, or sticky ownership (*住*) over the experience.

誤讀二:把「現在」當作永恆固定的避難所

*Misconception 2: Treating "The Present" as an Eternal, Solid Sanctuary.* * Clarification: A widespread misinterpretation claims that while past and future are illusions, the "Now" is an absolute, solid reality where one can hide. * Canonical Correction: The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* reminds us that **"the three times are equal, ultimately unfindable" (*三世悉平等,究竟無所有*)**. The present moment is just as impermanent, conditioned, and empty of inherent existence (*svabhāva*) as the past and future. If you cling to "the present moment" as a solid anchor, you are still practicing "clinging to the present" (*受現在法*). The ultimate goal is **"non-attachment to all three times" (*不著三世*)**.

誤讀三:混淆「當下身心現象」與「主觀妄念」

*Misconception 3: Equating "The Present" with Any Random Thought that Pops Up.* * Clarification: People often say, *"My thought right now is that I hate my job, so I am just honoring my authentic present."* * Canonical Correction: In early canons, a spontaneous thought is a mental object (*dharmāyata*) triggering mental consciousness (*manovijñāna*). If you blindly follow that thought without discernment, you are reacting to mental projections (*想* and *行*). The canonical instruction for the present—"regarding present phenomena, reflect upon them as they are" (*現在所有法,彼亦當為思*)—requires stepping back to observe that thought as a conditioned, impermanent event (*念無有堅強*), rather than confusing a subjective emotional reaction with objective truth.

誤讀四:忽視當下與「迴向」及「願力」的連結

*Misconception 4: Severing the Present from Ethical Aspiration and Dedication.* * Clarification: Seeing the present as fleeting can lead to nihilism—asking, *"If the present is like a phantom or an echo, why do good deeds right now?"* * Canonical Correction: The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* integrates present action with Mahāyāna practice through **Dedication (*Parīṇāmanā*, 迴向)**: > "As past, future, and present Buddhas performed dedications, so do I dedicate." (*如過去未來現在諸佛所作迴向,我亦如是迴向*) The present moment is precisely where ethical actions are undertaken and dedicated toward universal awakening. Far from leading to passive nihilism, the impermanent nature of the present makes every current action a vital opportunity to emulate the wisdom and compassion of all Buddhas across time.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

在佛教经典中,「现在」(pratyutpanna)是一个核心的时间与修行概念。它不仅指代与过去、未来相对的当下时间维度,更特指在当下这一瞬间,修行者所面临的六入处、心识及五阴等一切现象的呈现。

综合《中阿含经》与《大宝积经》的论述,「现在」的核心要义在于其「非坚固性」与「究竟无所有」的本质。修行者对待「现在」的正确态度,并非去追逐或停留于当下的感官体验,而是应当以智慧进行如实观照,体悟当下诸法的虚妄不实,从而在当下不生染着、不求、不着、不住,以此达到「不受现在法」与「不着三世」的解脱境界。

二、 主要阐述

对于「现在」这一概念,经典从观照其本质、修行实践、业报认知等多个维度展开了深入的阐述:

1. 观照现在诸法的虚妄与非坚固性

经典强调,修行者首先必须洞察当下呈现之法的本质。《中阿含经》著名的「跋地罗帝偈」指出,对于当下所呈现的一切现象,修行者应当进行如实的思惟与观察,并体悟到这些念头与现象皆是脆弱、不实且无有坚固性的。有智慧的人应当如此觉悟,认识到当下之法「无有坚强」的真相。

《大宝积经》则将这种非坚固性提升至「三世平等」的高度。经中指出,从根本实相来看,现在与过去、未来是完全平等的,世尊以正智慧观察,得出「三世悉平等,究竟无所有」的结论。为了具体说明现在等三世时间段的虚妄不实,经中使用了多个经典的比喻,宣说「三世皆悉无坚牢」,它们就像幻术(「如幻」)、像阳焰(「如焰」),也像空谷回音(「犹如响」)。这种「究竟无所有」与「无坚牢」的本质,是凡夫智慧难以理解的,因而容易令凡夫产生迷惑。

2. 「受现在法」与「不受现在法」的修行抉择

在具体的修行实践中,如何对待当下的「现在」是区分凡夫与圣者的关键。《中阿含经》从两个维度对此进行了剖析: - 六入处与识的维度:当下的眼、色、眼识(以及耳、鼻、舌、身、意、法、意识)呈现时,如果修行者对这些「现在识」产生了欲求与染着,并因此产生乐着,这就称为「受现在法」。反之,若能在当下不产生染着与乐着,则是不受现在法。 - 五阴的维度:在与尊者卢夷强耆的对话中,佛陀指出,如果比丘对现在的「色」以及「觉、想、行、识」产生乐着、欲求、执着并停留其中(欲、着、住),即属于「受现在法」;若能做到不乐、不欲、不着、不住,则是「不受现在法」。

3. 当下的现前观察与业报明了

《大宝积经》进一步强调了在当下进行自我检视的重要性。经中提到「现前见身过,是得智慧眼」,这意味着在当下(现前)能够如实观察并见到自身的过失,即是获得了智慧之眼。此外,具有智慧者还能「能知三种业,现未及过去」,通过对现在、未来及过去三世业力的明晰觉知,来破除众生的迷惑。

4. 效法诸佛的当下回向

在修行功德的处置上,修行者应当将当下的修行与三世诸佛紧密相连。《大宝积经》中,修行者发愿:「如过去未来现在诸佛所作回向,我亦如是回向。」 这表明现在的修行实践应当与过去、未来及现在的所有佛陀保持一致。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典及译本中,对于「现在」及相关概念的术语呈现出独特的译词特征与多样的表述方式:

1. 五阴与五蕴的译词差异: 在论述五蕴这一概念时,《中阿含经》具有独特的译词特征。该经并未使用常见的「色、受、想、行、识」,而是将「受蕴」译为「觉」,整体表述为「色、觉、想、行、识」。这一独特的术语形式是理解该经对「现在」体验(如对当下感受的执着与否)的关键所在。

2. 「现在」与「三世」的术语配搭: - 《中阿含经》多使用「现在所有法」、「现在识」 及「受现在法」 等词,侧重于当下心识与境界的互动。 - 《大宝积经》(唐菩提流志译)则呈现出更多样的配搭:直接使用「三世」作为过去、现在、未来的合称;在论及业报时,采用了「现未及过去」的独特顺序与称法,其中「现」即指代现在;在提及诸佛时,则使用了「过去未来现在」的顺序;在描述当下当前的观察时,则使用了「现前」一词(如「现前见身过」)。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 与「过去、未来(三世)」的关系: 现在与过去、未来共同构成「三世」的时间框架。在《大宝积经》中,现在并非孤立存在,而是与过去、未来平等,皆具有「究竟无所有」 和「无坚牢」 的虚妄本质。修行者应当达到「不着三世」的境界,脱离对时间相状的缚着。

2. 与「六入处、识、五阴」的关系: 在《中阿含经》中,「现在」是通过当下的眼、色、眼识等六入处与现在识,以及色、觉、想、行、识等五阴的呈现来具体化的。修行者对这些对象是否产生欲、着、住,直接决定了其是「受现在法」还是「不受现在法」。

3. 与「智慧眼」的关系: 在当下(现前)如实观察并见到自身的过失,是获得「智慧眼」的标志,此智慧眼能依凭佛慧悉照「三有」。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《中阿含经》: - 「现在所有法,彼亦当为思,念无有坚强,慧者觉如是。」 - 「若有比丘于现在色、觉、想、行、识,生乐着、欲、着、住,如是比丘受现在法。若有比丘于现在色、觉、想、行、识,不生乐着、欲、着、住,如是比丘不受现在法。」

2. 《大宝积经》: - 「三世悉平等,究竟无所有,此是凡夫智,所不能了知。」 - 「三世皆悉无坚牢,如幻如焰犹如响。」 - 「如过去未来现在诸佛所作回向,我亦如是回向。」

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》論「現在」,集中見於經中反覆誦出的「跋地羅帝偈」。偈以三世對舉為基本框架:「慎莫念過去,亦勿願未來,過去事已滅,未來復未至」——過去已滅、未來未至,二者皆非當下用功之處;緊接以「現在所有法,彼亦當為思」正面點出:現在諸法正是應當思惟觀察的對象。此偈於經中多次重出,文句大體相同,僅個別字略有異寫。

經中對「現在」的論述可析為數層。其一,以遮詮界定現在:過去「已滅」、未來「未至」,遮去二者之後所餘即是「現在所有法」;現在並非獨立自存的實體,而是於已滅與未至之間、正可被思惟的那一段法。其二,對現在法取正面態度:「彼亦當為思」——不是迴避或壓抑,而是如實思察;此與前二句之「莫念」「勿願」形成對照:對過去、未來是止息攀緣,對現在則是起觀。其三,現在法之性為「念無有堅強」:即便對現在法起思惟,亦不可執以為堅實;「無有堅強」即無常、不堅固、不可把捉。故對現在的正確姿態並非抓取,而是「慧者覺如是」——以慧覺知其剎那遷流。其四,偈末歸於修行:能如是行者「孰知愁於死」,不復憂懼死喪;「行精勤,晝夜無懈怠」,以大苦災患之終為究竟。「現在」在此遂非貪著對象,而是正念思惟與智慧觀照的場域。

經中自標此偈之名曰「跋地羅帝偈」,並令「常當說」,顯示其作為獨立教說單元而被反覆傳誦。各處引文於個別字句略有異同:或作「若作聖人行」,或作「若學聖人行」,或作「為作聖人行」;又「行精勤」 與「行精進」 之異。此皆傳寫異文,義理無別。全偈用語一致:以「過去、現在、未來」說三世,以「所有法」稱現在諸法,以「無有堅強」狀其性,未見以其他名相稱說現在者。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》(唐菩提流志譯,寶積部)在所見原文塊中,對「現在」一詞的使用極為簡要,且並非以獨立論題的方式加以界定或分析,而是將之置於「三世」框架中作為限定語使用。

一、三世並舉的固定語式。經文出現「過去未來現在諸佛」的表述,將「現在」與「過去」「未來」並列,構成完整的三世時際序列。此處「現在」所修飾的對象是「諸佛」,即「現在諸佛」——當下已成正覺、尚未示現涅槃的世尊。經文並未對「現在」本身的時間邊界(如何謂「已生」、何謂「尚未滅」)作出進一步的界定或論述,而是直接以之為讀者共許的時際指稱,用以標定迴向所效法的對象範圍。

二、語用脈絡:迴向文。該「現在」出現於迴向語境:「如過去未來現在諸佛所作迴向,我亦如是迴向。」 其功能在於將行者所修功德,與三世一切諸佛的迴向行持對齊、等同,強調的是效法對象的周遍性——不僅限於過去佛、未來佛,亦包含「現在」住世說法之佛。在此,「現在」承擔的語義角色是「三世周遍」中不可或缺的一環,使迴向的所緣境達至圓滿。

三、術語形式。本經直接使用「現在」二字,未見以「今世」「現時」「當今」等異稱替代,亦未見以梵文音譯(如「阿達磨」之類)稱之。與「過去」「未來」合用時,語序固定為「過去未來現在」,而非「過去現在未來」。此語序將「現在」置於三者之末,或與漢譯行文節奏及偈頌韻律有關,但經文本身未就此語序給出解釋。

四、另一處含「現」字之文。另有「舍摩他現前天子以偈讚曰」一句,其中「現前」為天子名號的組成部分(舍摩他現前),義為「止(奢摩他)現前」,指禪定境界的當下顯發,屬於專名而非對「現在」時際概念的論述。此處「現前」與「現在」雖同含「現」字,但語義指向不同:「現前」側重「顯現於前」,「現在」側重「處於當此時際」,不宜混同。

總括而言,在所見原文塊範圍內,《大寶積經》並未對「現在」作為獨立時間概念進行定義式論述(如「已生未滅」之界定),而是將之作為三世框架中的共許成分,用於標定諸佛的時際歸屬,服務於迴向文的周遍義。此為本經在現有材料中對「現在」一詞的全部使用方式。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》論「現在」,首先追問其成立根據:法於現在時「生用已謝」——引生之力已畢,則憑何相狀安立為現在?論主因此要求「應說現在相」,即現在不能僅以「已生未滅」消極界定,須有積極的相狀說明。

由此引出住、異、滅三相同屬現在之難題:若住等三用俱在一剎那,則一法體同時有安住、衰異、壞滅,此法究竟名住、名異、名滅?若謂三用不同時,又違剎那滅義——一剎那中法即生即滅,不容前後分位。論主層層詰難:住相若力強先用,何以後時轉劣,與本法俱遭異滅所衰壞?若謂住用已起不復再起,則住用應常起——蓋住之功能為「安所住令不衰滅」,已住者正須永安住,不同生用之「引所生令入現在」一引即畢、已入不應復引。又問:誰障住用令暫有還無?若言異滅能障,異滅力應強,何不於先用?住用既息,本法自然不住,異滅二相更無所為。

論主最終傾向:由住攝持,諸法生已暫時不滅;住用既捨,法定不住即自然滅。異非別有一法——「異謂前後性相轉變,非即此法可言異此」,只是同一法前後性相轉變之假名,非離此法別有異體。

在業論脈絡中,論以「成」字安立三世分位:無表業初剎那「但成現在」,而「現在世處過未中,故以成中說成現在」——現在之所以為現在,正因其處於過去與未來之間,以「成中」得名。初剎那後未捨以來,則恒成過現二世無表。 頌文更明言:表業「正作成中,後成過非未」;有覆、無覆無記法「唯成就現在」——此二類法不通過去未來,唯於現在一剎那成就。

術語方面,本論以「現在相」標舉現在之積極相狀,以「成現在」「成中」安立現在之分位,以「剎那」為最小時間單位,以「住用」「生用」稱說有為法諸相之功能,皆為毘曇部阿毘達磨特有之分析語彙。

Related