Dharma · AI Companion

放逸

pramāda

疏忽善法而纵任烦恼的心态。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

Here is a deep and accessible exploration of the concept for a contemporary reader.


We often associate the Buddhist path with concepts like emptiness, compassion, or mindfulness. But in the actual, gritty day-to-day work of walking the path to liberation (解脱道), there is a quiet, pervasive enemy that derails more practitioners than anything else. It is not dramatic evil or profound doubt. It is 放逸 (Pramāda)—often translated as heedlessness, recklessness, or negligence.

To understand this concept is to understand where our vital energy leaks away, and why, despite all our reading and good intentions, we often feel spiritually stuck. Let us explore this with the warmth of a good friend and the precision of the classical texts.

这个概念在说什么 (What is this concept saying)

In the context of the Path of Liberation, 放逸 (Pramāda) is defined as a psychological and behavioral state where a practitioner lets their mind loose, becomes lazy, stalls in progress, and fails to diligently practice meditation. This happens because they become attached to their own physical state, greedy for secular desires (wealth, fame), or simply addicted to comfort.

Its direct antidote is 不放逸 (Apramāda)—heedfulness, diligence, and the continuous, unbroken effort toward ultimate liberation. In the Buddhist framework, unless you are a fully awakened Arhat whose leaks of defilement are entirely exhausted (漏尽), you are required to practice Apramāda. To be satisfied with partial progress and "not seek higher" (不上求) is the very definition of heedlessness for a noble disciple.

The classical sutras (specifically the Agamas and the Maharatnakuta Sutra) break down the roots and traps of Pramāda with piercing clarity, using specific metaphors that we must map exactly:

* The Trap of the "Good Life": The *Madhyama Agama* points out that ordinary people generate "arrogant and aristocratic heedlessness" (贡高豪贵放逸) because they are attached to three things: youth (少壮), health (不病), and lifespan (寿). Because we feel invincible, we let our minds wander. * The Bait of the Senses (五欲功德 - The Five Desires): The desire for pleasant sights, sounds, smells, tastes, and touches is the core trigger. The Buddha uses the metaphor of the Hunter Feeding Deer (猎师饲鹿). The Five Desires are the sweet bait (hunter's food), Mara the Demon King is the hunter, and we are the deer. When we indulge in these desires, we become "arrogant and heedless" (憍恣放逸), entirely trapped in the hunter's snare. * The Mud of Stagnation: When one falls into heedlessness—perhaps enjoying soft silk pillows, sleeping until the sun rises (缯纊为枕,四体安卧), or harboring a "dull and intoxicated mind" (迷醉放逸心)—their wisdom becomes obscured. The *Maharatnakuta Sutra* compares this state to an Elephant trapped in deep mud (大象陷入深泥). The more you thrash around in heedless worldly pursuits, the deeper you sink, unable to free yourself. * The Antidote: To practice Apramāda is compared to Drilling Wood to Make Fire (钻木取火). The Buddha stated that his fire is "Apramāda," and this persistent, friction-generating effort is the only thing that can thoroughly burn away both heedlessness and arrogance (贡高我慢).

Particularly fascinating is the *Maharatnakuta Sutra’s* warning to advanced practitioners about the Four Types of Heedlessness (四种放逸). Pramāda doesn't just look like a person binge-watching TV; it can look highly "spiritual": 1. 多闻放逸 (Heedlessness of Erudition): Becoming arrogant because you have read many sutras or learned many theories, substituting intellectual hoarding for actual practice. 2. 利养放逸 (Heedlessness of Material Gain): Using spiritual status to acquire wealth, donations, or a comfortable lifestyle. 3. 亲友放逸 (Heedlessness of Connections): Relying on powerful secular friends or networks rather than your own solitary meditation. 4. 头陀放逸 (Heedlessness of Asceticism): Practicing extreme discipline (like waking up at 4 AM to meditate in the cold), but using it to fuel a massive ego, looking down on and slandering others.

生活里的走查 (A Walkthrough in Daily Life)

Let’s walk through a typical contemporary day and strictly map this classical definition, being careful to spot where we usually map it wrong.

Scenario 1: Commuting and the Trap of Health/Youth You are on the subway. You feel relatively healthy (不病) and young (少壮). The classical texts say this baseline comfort breeds "arrogant heedlessness." Because you don't feel death breathing down your neck, you pull out your phone. This isn't just "passing the time"; in the Buddhist sense, this is the exact moment the mind loses its anchor and scatters into the world of forms and sounds.

Scenario 2: After Work and the Hunter's Bait You finish a stressful day of overtime. You think, "I deserve a reward." You order expensive takeout (taste), put on a 4K streaming show (sight/sound), and sink into a soft sofa (touch). Most people map this as "self-care" or "resting." *The Classical Mapping:* This is the Hunter Feeding the Deer. You are consuming the Five Desires (五欲功德). It is not the food or the sofa that is the primary issue; it is the *mindset*—the "dull and intoxicated mind" (迷醉放逸心). You are seeking refuge in sensory bait rather than finding peace in mental clarity. You are letting Mara catch you because your guard is entirely down.

Scenario 3: The "Spiritual" Heedlessness (The 4 Nuanced Traps) You decide to get serious about mindfulness. You listen to 50 hours of podcasts on neuroscience and meditation. You argue with people on Reddit about Buddhist philosophy. *The Classical Mapping:* This is 多闻放逸 (Heedlessness of Erudition). You are replacing the actual "drilling of the wood" (sitting quietly, facing your own mind) with the dopamine hit of acquiring new information. Or perhaps you do a 10-day silent retreat and return home judging your partner for scrolling on TikTok. That is 头陀放逸 (Heedlessness of Asceticism)—your discipline has simply become food for your ego.

*Where people map it wrong:* People think 放逸 means "taking a break" or "sleeping." But the Buddha wasn't against sleep. True rest, taken with clear awareness to restore the body for practice, is not Pramāda. Pramāda requires a *loss of vigilance*, a voluntary surrender to intoxication, arrogance, or desire.

当代人为什么需要它 (Why do contemporary people need it)

We live in an era heavily defined by the "Attention Economy." In many ways, contemporary society is a highly optimized, algorithmic infrastructure designed to induce and monetize 放逸 (Pramāda).

We can look at this through the lens of modern neuroscience. Algorithms are designed to hijack our dopamine pathways, providing endless, frictionless novelty. This maps perfectly onto the Buddhist concept of being lured by the Five Desires. However, we must be careful: recognizing dopamine loops is helpful, but science is primarily concerned with restoring baseline neurochemical balance for productivity or mental health.

Buddhism’s Apramāda demands much more. It isn't just about doing a "dopamine detox" so you can work harder at your corporate job. It is about existential urgency. In the *Madhyama Agama*, the Buddha speaks of Yama's Messengers (阎王天使)—the sight of a newborn, an old person, a sick person, and a corpse. The algorithm hides these messengers from us, keeping us in a sanitized bubble of eternal youth and consumption. We need the concept of Apramāda to remind us that time is running out. We need the friction of "drilling wood to make fire" to wake up from the algorithmic trance, not just to be more productive, but to free ourselves from the cycle of suffering entirely.

常见误读与澄清 (Common Misreadings and Clarifications)

Misreading 1: "Pramāda means resting, so Apramāda means Hustle Culture." *Clarification:* This is a massive distortion. Hustling night and day to make money or gain status is explicitly categorized in the sutras as a form of Pramāda (specifically, *Heedlessness of material gain / 利养放逸*). The *Samyukta Agama* describes true Apramāda as going to an empty forest or sitting under the open sky, meditating day and night with a calm, joyful mind, seeking ultimate liberation (空闲林中...昼夜禅思,精勤方便). It is profound internal diligence, not capitalist grinding.

Misreading 2: "If I'm not perfectly mindful 24/7, I am committing the sin of Pramāda." *Clarification:* The *Samyukta Agama* offers a very compassionate and structural boundary here. It states that the strict discussion of whether someone is in a state of Pramāda or Apramāda applies primarily to *Noble Disciples (圣弟子)*—those who have already achieved unshakeable faith (四不坏净 - Four Verified Confidences). If a person has not even achieved basic faith or the Five Faculties (五根), they are considered "ordinary beings" (凡夫数). For a beginner, the goal is to build faith and basic morality first. You don't judge a kindergartener by the standards of a PhD defense.

Misreading 3: "Strict physical discipline proves I am not heedless." *Clarification:* As warned in the *Maharatnakuta Sutra*, physical rigor without wisdom is still the "Elephant trapped in deep mud." If your meditation practice, your vegan diet, or your minimalist lifestyle makes you feel superior to the "ignorant masses," the fire of Apramāda has gone out. You are simply practicing 头陀放逸 (Heedlessness of Asceticism). True Apramāda is deeply humble; it is the quiet, unbroken effort of a person who knows the house is on fire and is solely focused on finding the door.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

放逸(pramāda)是指修行者因执着自身状态、贪著世俗五欲、财利或安逸,导致心神放纵、懈怠不前、不精勤修禅的心理与行为状态;其对治为“不放逸”(或称“无逸”),即精勤修习以达成解脱。

二、主要阐述

1. 放逸的根源与表现形式 放逸的产生与凡夫对自身状态的执着及对感官欲望的追求密切相关。在《中阿含经》中,世尊指出愚痴凡夫常因“不病”、“少壮”和“寿”而生起“贡高豪贵放逸”,并因欲望而产生愚痴,不修梵行。追求眼、耳、鼻、舌、身之“五欲功德”是导致放逸的核心诱因,经中以“猎师饲鹿”为喻,将五欲功德比作“猎师之食”,恶魔王比作“猎师”;沙门和梵志若贪图世间信施与五欲,便会陷入“憍恣放逸”,从而落入魔王的掌控之中。《大宝积经》也指出,放逸常与贪著世俗五欲、财色、名利相伴,如部分比丘“放逸受五欲,耕種行販賣”,使其与世俗白衣无异。 在《杂阿含经》中,放逸多因贪著乐境、财利或安逸而起。例如,三十三天因“多著放逸乐”而易产生放逸,或忆先事,或时不忆,甚至对新成的堂观极自放逸。在人间,人们得到“胜妙财利”后,也极易生起放逸,增其贪著,起诸邪行。此外,贪图安逸、懈怠不前也是放逸的表现,如未来世的比丘“恣乐无事,手足柔软,缯纊为枕,四体安卧,日出不起”,这种状态即是“放逸而住”。经中还提到“爱念而放逸,逍遥青树间”、“迷醉放逸心”以及“起家放逸”等心境的放纵。 值得注意的是,《杂阿含经》对圣弟子的“放逸”作出了严格的定义:若圣弟子虽然成就了对佛、法、僧的不坏净及圣戒,但“不上求”,不于空闲林中或露地坐、昼夜禅思,不精勤修习,导致欢喜不生、身不猗息、苦觉生、心不得定,这就称为“放逸”。而对于“五根”或“四不坏净”一切时都不成就者,则属于“凡夫数”,不属于圣弟子讨论放逸与否的范畴。 此外,《大宝积经》特别针对出家修行者,提出了“四种放逸”:一是自恃博学多闻而产生放逸的“多闻放逸”;二是因获得世俗利养而产生放逸的“利养放逸”;三是依恃亲友的势力或关系而产生放逸的“亲友放逸”;四是自恃修持头陀苦行,从而自高自大、毁谤他人的“头陀放逸”。

2. 放逸的严重危害与恶果 放逸是修行的大敌,会导致严重的世间与出世间恶果。 首先,放逸会招致痛苦与恶报。《中阿含经》通过阎王审判的寓言展现了放逸的后果。阎王派遣“天使”(生、老、病、死)来警示世人,而放逸者在见到这些变化后,却未能警醒并思惟修妙身、口、意业,因而被称为“放逸人”。这类人最终“了败坏,长衰永失”,必须自受恶报。偈颂亦警示,被天使诃责却仍旧放逸者,将被“弊欲所覆”,长夜忧戚。《杂阿含经》亦指出,因财放逸、起贪著邪行者是愚痴人,长夜当得不饶益苦,缘于放逸当受大苦报。《大宝积经》则警告,若贪图放逸,不仅无法度脱众生,还会使人堕入恶道或地狱。 其次,放逸会使修行者被魔或怨家得便。在《杂阿含经》中,放逸而住会导致怨家或恶魔波旬伺得其便,随魔自在。 最后,放逸会障碍智慧与解脱。在《大宝积经》中,放逸是菩萨的“四系缚”之一,如“不守自心智慧未成而行放逸”以及“乐入白衣家,常怀于放逸,暗钝无智慧”,会使修行者如同大象陷入深泥般无法自拔。在《杂阿含经》中,处林而放逸者,不能调伏其心,不得三昧定,因而不能度过死魔军的彼岸。

3. 不放逸的修行功德与对治力量 与放逸相对,“不放逸”具有无上的功德,是熄灭烦恼、达成解脱的关键。 在《中阿含经》中,世尊以钻木取火为喻,指出自己所得之火即是“不放逸”,它能够彻底熄灭“放逸及贡高慢”。在具体的修行指导中,世尊对不同阶段的比丘提出了不同要求:对于已证得“俱解脱”和“慧解脱”的比丘,因其已断尽诸漏,本已行无放逸,故无需再特别强调;而对于“身证”、“见到”、“信解脱”、“法行”和“信行”这五类尚未究竟解脱的比丘,世尊则极力劝勉他们必须“行无放逸”,因为这些比丘若能坚持不放逸,便能亲近善知识、随顺修行,最终实现诸漏已尽,于现法中自知自作证。 在《杂阿含经》中,若圣弟子在成就四不坏净的基础上,“其心不起知足想”,在空闲林中、树下露地,昼夜禅思,精勤方便,生起胜妙出离随喜,最终心得到安定,则称为“不放逸”。不放逸的功德包括:防范恶魔与怨家,使其不得其便;证得解脱,修禅不放逸能“逮得证诸漏”、“疾得尽诸漏”;获得现法与后世之利;达到调伏与寂止,身口心离恶。即使圣弟子有所放逸,但因其已得决定,最终仍能“决定向三菩提,七有天人往来,作苦边”。 在《大宝积经》中,业无放逸天子以偈颂赞叹道:“现前无放逸,佛修成菩提,导师于正法,无逸到彼岸。” 这表明不放逸是诸佛成就菩提、到达涅槃彼岸的必经之路。同时,不放逸能够促进一切助道法的生长,从而利益群生并实现自身的解脱。因此,修行者应当在出家修持梵行、安住“八妙道”时,“弃捐诸放逸,于不放逸恒修学”,在面对世俗的王位、富乐与五欲时,坚决拒绝,因为真正的菩提不在于欲乐,而在于寂静处。修行者应当“谨慎莫放逸”,也“莫随顺放逸者”,应当“常自调顺不放逸”,如此才能不久成佛。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同部类及译本中,关于“放逸”与“不放逸”的用词 and 表述存在以下差异: 1. 不放逸的异称:在《大宝积经》(唐菩提流志译)中,“不放逸”有时被表述为“无逸”,如偈颂中的“导师于正法,无逸到彼岸”。而在《中阿含经》与《杂阿含经》中,则普遍使用“不放逸”或“不放逸住”。 2. 放逸的特定复合词: - 《中阿含经》中出现了“贡高豪贵放逸”、“憍恣放逸”、“行无放逸”等表述。 - 《杂阿含经》中使用了“不放逸住”、“放逸而住”、“起家放逸”、“迷醉放逸心”等特定表述。此外,该经还以“放荡”与“禅思”相对,如“远离于放荡,日夜常思禅”,其“放荡”在语境中与“放逸”含义相通。 - 《大宝积经》中则提出了特定的“四种放逸”,即“多闻放逸”、“利养放逸”、“亲友放逸”和“头陀放逸”。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与“五欲功德”的关系:五欲功德是导致放逸的核心诱因。《中阿含经》将其比作“猎师之食”,指出贪图五欲会导致“憍恣放逸”并落入魔掌;《大宝积经》亦指出“放逸受五欲”会使修行者与世俗无异。 2. 与“四不坏净”及“五根”的关系:《杂阿含经》指出,放逸与不放逸的讨论仅限于成就四不坏净的圣弟子;若对“五根”或“四不坏净”一切时都不成就者,则属于“凡夫数”,不属于讨论范畴。 3. 与“贡高我慢”的关系:放逸常与贡高我慢相伴生起。《中阿含经》中,因不病、少壮、寿而生起“贡高豪贵放逸”;而“不放逸”之火则能熄灭“放逸及贡高慢”。 4. 与“禅思”的关系:在《杂阿含经》中,“放荡”与“禅思”相对;圣弟子若不精勤修习、不昼夜禅思即是放逸。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《中阿含经》:“愚癡凡夫因不病、少壯、壽,生貢高豪貴放逸,因欲生愚癡,不修梵行。” 2. 《中阿含经》:“我所得火者,謂不放逸也。此不放逸火能滅放逸及貢高慢。” 3. 《杂阿含经》:“若聖弟子成就於佛不壞淨,不上求,不於空閒林中、若露地坐,晝夜禪思,精勤方便……是名放逸。” 4. 《大宝积经》:“多聞放逸、利養放逸、親友放逸、頭陀放逸……具此四法墮於地獄。” 5. 《大宝积经》:“現前無放逸,佛修成菩提,導師於正法,無逸到彼岸。”

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

《中阿含經》論「放逸」,主要不是作抽象義解,而是藉果報、人生無常、欲樂誘惑與修行脫離等脈絡,顯示其具體作用及後果。其一,閻王以生、老、病、死等「天使」詰問造惡者:既已親見眾生必受生老病死,何不警覺自身亦有此法,進而行妙身、口、意業?經文稱此類未能由所見而自警、反自作惡不善業者為「放逸行、放逸人」,並強調惡業是本人所作,非父母、王、天或沙門、梵志代作,故必須自受其報。此處「放逸」具疏忽警策、未修善業而造不善業之義。

其二,偈頌以「人故放逸」及「弊欲所覆」相連,說明受天使訶責仍然放逸者,長夜憂慼;相反,「真實有上人」聞善說妙聖法後終不復放逸,求生老盡,至「無受滅無餘」,現法得滅度,超越恐怖。此處以「不復放逸」表現修行方向,並將放逸的根源側重於為惡劣欲望所覆。

其三,《中阿含經》又把放逸與「貢高豪貴」及「因欲生癡」並說。凡夫因不病、少壯、壽命而起貢高,遂豪貴放逸,不行梵行;如實觀察自己亦不離病、老等法,則相應的貢高即可自滅。這顯示放逸不僅是一般疏忽,也包括倚恃健康、青春與壽命而縱任欲望、荒廢梵行的心態。

其四,天王釋自述,諸天因未值如來而「行具足五欲功德」,並直稱「我等放逸,行放逸已」;當他看見大威德天子在極妙處命終,便生厭離與憂慼。此段突出即使處於殊勝欲樂之境,放逸仍不能免除命終,對死亡的親見反成為厭離欲樂、尋求寂靜修行的契機。

其五,鹿群譬喻把放逸的發生次第說得尤為鮮明:鹿近食獵師之食,便「憍恣放逸」,繼而隨獵師及其眷屬,不能脫離其境界;經文解釋獵師食為「五欲功德」,獵師為惡魔王,鹿群為沙門、梵志。沙門、梵志近食世間信施食後,若憍恣放逸,便落入魔王境界;唯有不近其食、不憍恣放逸、不隨魔王眷屬,住於魔王所不至處,方能脫離。這裡的固定表述是「憍恣放逸」,凸顯受用欲樂或利養後的驕縱與失守。

此外,經中以「所得不放逸」與「能滅放逸及貢高慢」相配,將「不放逸」說成能對治放逸、貢高與慢的所得,如火能燒除其所對治者。就本經用語而言,應記錄「放逸行」「放逸人」「憍恣放逸」「豪貴放逸」「不放逸」及「所得不放逸」等形式;其中尤其常把放逸與欲、貢高、憍恣、惡不善業及不行梵行相連,而非另立一套專門名相定義。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》對「放逸」的核心界定,主要落在已具善法基礎卻不繼續上求、精勤修習。聖弟子雖成就佛、法、僧不壞淨及聖戒,若因此知足,不往空閑林中、樹下或露地晝夜禪思,不能引生勝妙出離、隨喜、歡喜、身猗息、樂受與心定,即名「放逸」;反之,不起知足想,精勤方便而令心定,則名「不放逸」。經文由修習次第與定心之成敗具體判別放逸,並指出五根或四不壞淨全不成就者屬凡夫,聖弟子才進一步論其放逸與否。

本經亦以「縱樂懈怠」呈現放逸。帝釋自言三十三天多著放逸樂,或能憶念先事,或不能憶;大目揵連見其耽著天界神住、稱歎堂觀,判為「極自放逸」,欲令其心生厭離。此處顯出勝妙享受、遊戲與自滿足以使憶念昏忽、厭離心不生。 比丘若恣樂無事、安臥柔軟、日出不起,便是「放逸而住」,使惡魔波旬得其間便;相對者稱「不放逸住」,其內容是精勤方便、堅固堪能、不捨善法,未得所應得者便不捨精進,常攝其心。

在世俗財利方面,本經反覆使用「於財放逸」一語:人得勝妙財利後,若生貪著、造作邪行,即因放逸而長夜受不饒益苦;偈中又說為貪所迷醉、狂亂不自覺,如捕獵者一般,緣放逸故當受大苦報。放逸在此與貪欲、迷醉、自失覺察及傷害眾生的惡行相連。 另有偈頌將它與愚癡、惡慧、憍慢欲、不能自調伏、不得三昧正受並舉;即使獨居山林,若心仍放逸,也不能度死魔彼岸。禪思不放逸者則能迅速盡諸漏。

本經所用術語形式以「放逸」「不放逸」為主,並見「放逸樂」「極自放逸」「於財放逸」「放逸而住」「不放逸住」「莫放逸慢恣」等表述。 「不令放逸」又與寂止、自調伏、遠離、受持淨戒及身口心離惡相應;「不放逸具足」則能攝持現法利與後世利二義。 經中也以帝釋為不放逸的例證,說其因不放逸而能主忉利天。 此外,經文仍承認聖弟子即使放逸,亦已決定趣向三菩提,於七有天人往來後作苦邊,顯示此處所說放逸不等同於全無聖道根基。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》以「放逸」指向疏於善行、縱任不善而不能及時自警的狀態,並反覆以生死、業報與修道成敗說明其嚴重性。其核心偈語把放逸直接稱為「死徑」:「無憍甘露跡,放逸是死徑」,又以慢與不死、死亡相對,顯示放逸與憍慢相連,背離通向甘露之跡。 另一偈則說「戒為甘露道,放逸為死徑」,並以「失道為自喪」收束;此處以持戒對治放逸,將放逸表述為偏失正道、自致損喪的根由。

經中也從業果說明放逸:貧乏者反省自己曩昔「不造福」、欺誑世人而「行放逸法」,所以今生遭受衣食不充;其後若向修善者懺悔、改往修來,並將餘物與人等分,命終便得生於善處。此段所用術語是「放逸法」,特別著重不布施、不修福等行為所感的苦報。 閻羅王審問罪人時,又稱其應受究治者為「放逸罪行」,並明言惡業既非父母、國王或大臣所造,而是本人「自作罪,今自受報」。放逸因而不是可歸咎他人的過失,而是眾生自身身、口、意不修善行所負的責任。

在修行時限上,《增壹阿含經》對放逸提出極嚴格的警策。比丘思惟死想,若預期尚可存活七日、六日,乃至一日,佛皆斥為「放逸之法」;即使計畫乞食歸來後再修七覺意,也被稱為「放逸之行」。經中認可的是繫意當前、心不移動,在一呼一吸的短促間思惟七覺意。這顯示放逸也包括把修善推延至稍後,真正的不放逸則是念死迫切、當下用功。

經中正面勸誡所用的形式有「無放逸行」:比丘應專一其心、求方便成就「賢聖八品之道」,依此自度生死之海。 另有偈以「如此放逸人」描述再造非行、成就有漏行者,並以「勤加心」「恒在心首」及彼此教誡,對舉其轉成無漏之可能。 又說「百年習放逸,後故入地獄」,以長久習染與難以計量的受罪相連,警示放逸不可貪著。

此外,經中也保留日常警覺義:大臣發現敵王已入城,責本王「極為放逸」,意指疏忽戒備、未能察知危險。 綜合而言,本經使用「放逸」「放逸法」「放逸之法」「放逸之行」「無放逸行」「放逸罪行」「放逸人」等形式;其論述由疏忽警戒,推及不修福善、延宕修行、造有漏業與承受惡報,並以持戒、念死、專心及修賢聖八品之道作為相對的實踐方向。

Related