Dharma · AI Companion

paryavasthāna

现行烦恼对心的缠缚。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Saying

In the modern frame of mind, "being trapped" is almost always accompanied by a clearly identifiable culprit: the crowded morning rush hour, the endless stack of PPTs, an unreasonable boss, a terrible mortgage rate, or a painful romantic relationship. We habitually cast our gaze outward, believing that as long as we can rid ourselves of these external objects, the mind will regain its freedom.

Yet the definition of 纏 (paryavasthāna, "entanglement") in the Buddhist canon offers a radically opposite perspective.

The literal meaning of 纏 is to be entangled, coiled around, and tightly bound. In the 《杂阿含经》 (Saṃyuktāgama, *Connected Discourses*), it is precisely defined as the internal affliction that binds the minds of sentient beings and prevents their liberation—specifically the three poisons of greed, hatred, and delusion (貪瞋痴, rāga-dveṣa-moha).

To understand 纏, one must first clarify the extremely rigorous and multi-layered analysis of "internal versus external bondage" found in the canon:

1. Distinguishing Internal and External Bondage: The True Shackles Are in the Mind, Not in Things

The 《杂阿含经》 states categorically: "外缠结非缠,内缠缠众生" ("External tangles are not the bondage; it is the internal entanglement that binds sentient beings") [0]; and again: "外身萦髻者,是但名萦髻;内心萦髻者,是结缚众生" ("One whose external body wears a coiled hair-knot is merely *called* 'knot-haired'; one whose mind is internally coiled is one bound and fettered") [0].

Here, "萦髻" (coiled hair-knot) is a metaphor for hair that is tangled, interwoven, and difficult to undo. If it is only the external body that is bound by ropes, or the hair that is tangled, that is merely nominal bondage; what truly binds a person fast in the sea of birth-and-death is the internal tangling and interweaving of the mind.

The canon even overturns common sense by pointing out: the visible shackles of the world (such as "绳鏁杻械"—ropes, chains, and fetters) are not really firm bonds; what is truly enduring, solid, and difficult to escape is the mind's deep clinging, through a defiled mind (染污心, kliṣṭa-citta), to "钱财宝妻子" (wealth, treasures, wife, and children) and its heavy attachment to the "世间五欲乐" (the five sensual pleasures of the world) [0]. The demonic hordes may indeed lay snares like "长绳羂" (long-rope nooses), but if the mind has no internal entanglement for them to hook onto, external traps cannot take effect at all [0].

2. The Substance and Harm of Entanglement: A Self-Generated, Self-Destroying Internal Toxin

The substance of 纏 is precisely greed, hatred, and delusion [0]. The canon compares them to two things of great penetrating power: * "内发还自伤,犹如竹芦实" ("What arises within turns back to harm itself, like the fruit of bamboo and reed"): once bamboo and reeds bear fruit (blossom and set seed), that very fruiting means the withering and death of their own lives [0]. Greed, hatred, and delusion—this internal entanglement—work the same way: they sprout from the depths of the mind, require no external weaponry, and their inherent toxicity dismantles and destroys a person's spirituality and peace from within [0]. * "非世间尘土"的内尘 ("inner dust" that is not the dust of the world): the canon calls greed, hatred, and delusion "dust" or "defiling dust" (塵垢) [0]. The dust of the world merely falls on skin or furniture and can be wiped away; but the "dust" of the three poisons causes the mind's consciousness to "随外缘,乱想而流驰" (follow external conditions, letting scattered thoughts race and stream), completely robbing awareness of self-mastery and sending it running wild with every gust of the external world [0].

3. The Position of 纏 on the Path to Liberation

Within the Buddhist taxonomy of afflictions (煩惱, kleśa), 纏 is mutually expressive with 結 (saṃyojana, "fetters") and 縛 (bandhana, "bonds") [0]. They are core obstacles on the mind's road to nirvāṇa (涅槃) and liberation (解脫, vimokṣa). If this internal entanglement is not untied, then no matter where one flees, one runs in shackles; but once "烦恼悉断坏" (all afflictions are severed and destroyed), one can "度生死淤泥,著缠悉散落" (cross the mud of birth-and-death, and all clinging entanglements scatter and fall away), experiencing the complete removal of hindrances and the lightness of ease [0].


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

To keep 纏 from becoming an abstract noun-to-noun translation, we can walk through its operative mechanism step by step using the most familiar contemporary scenario—scrolling through one's phone late at night and social-media anxiety—strictly mapping each level of the classical definition:

Step One: The External "Five Desires" and Misjudgment

At 11 p.m., you get home after overtime, exhausted. You lie in bed and open your phone. The screen is filled with influencers in elaborate outfits checking in at resort destinations, peers showing off high-paying job offers at big tech companies, or luxury consumer goods. * Where most people mis-map: We tend to think that the pain and anxiety come from "the phone itself," "the algorithm's recommendations," or "other people showing off." We feel that "if I didn't have this phone, or if I switched to a job that doesn't demand overtime, I would be free." This is projecting bondage onto external things. * Accurate mapping to the classical definition: The phone, the luxury cars and horses in your social feed, wealth, and pleasure are only external "世间五欲" (the five sensual desires of the world) [0]. The canon explicitly states that these external things are "非坚缚" (not firm bonds) [0]—a phone is just a piece of glass and silicon; a social feed is just a collection of pixels. What truly binds you is not the phone, and not other people's lives.

Step Two: The Mind's "Defiled-Mind Grasping" (Activation of 纏)

As you look at the screen, a subtle thought arises in your mind: "Why does she get to go to Santorini while I have to work overtime?" (hatred/envy); then: "I too must buy that bag / get that house, so that I can count as successful" (greed); and finally: "As long as I have these things, I will be happy forever" (delusion—ignorance of impermanence). * Accurate mapping to the classical definition: At this moment, your mind, with a defiled mind (染污心), "顾念" (grasps after) these external objects [0]. The greed, hatred, and delusion that were dormant in the subconscious are activated; like vines, they rapidly sprout and branch through your awareness. This is precisely "内缠缠众生" (the internal entanglement binds the being) [0]. Your breathing becomes shallow, your heart rate quickens; your body is exhausted, yet your brain is intensely excited and anxious.

Step Three: "Following External Conditions, Scattered Thoughts Race and Stream"—and Self-Injury

Immediately after, your hand involuntarily switches between shopping apps and social platforms, scrolling from 11 p.m. to 2 a.m. You are immersed in the pain of "not getting" and the fear of "falling behind," unable to pull yourself out. * Accurate mapping to the classical definition: This is what the canon calls "贪瞋痴是名世间尘" (greed, hatred, and delusion are called the dust of the world)—this internal defilement causes your mind to "随外缘,乱想而流驰" (follow external conditions, letting scattered thoughts race and stream) [0]. Even more terrifying is "内发还自伤,犹如竹芦实" (what arises within turns back to harm itself, like the fruit of bamboo and reed) [0]—no one is physically striking you in the real world, yet your internal craving and hatred have already completely collapsed your next day's mental state, immune system, and emotions. You have been drained of your last drop of vitality by internal entanglement.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary life is extremely adept at manufacturing the illusion of "external liberation." Algorithmic systems, consumerism, and technological progress all sell us the same narrative: *"You are not free because you don't own enough yet, or because your tools aren't advanced enough."*

We think that with faster internet, higher income, and a more comfortable house, we can escape bondage. Yet the reality of contemporary psychology and algorithmic life repeatedly confirms the Buddhist assertion: as long as the internal 纏 is not untied, material abundance only increases the stickiness of the entanglement.

On this point, contemporary neuroscience and AI-algorithm mechanisms can serve as an excellent point of comparison for understanding 纏 (note: this is not science proving Buddhism, but a mutual corroboration at the level of lived experience):

* The "dopamine circuit" from the neuroscience perspective: Neuroscience has found that the brain's reward-prediction-error mechanism (Dopamine Reward Prediction Error) ensures that the satisfaction of desire can only ever bring temporary pleasure, followed by an even deeper sense of lack. This explains with remarkable fidelity the physiological basis of 貪 (rāga, greed) as a form of 纏—the more you feed it with external stimuli, the deeper this internal vine takes root. Yet this has its limits: neuroscience tends to attribute this to an unchangeable evolutionary mechanism, whereas Buddhism points to a path of liberation through practice that breaks this circuit. * The "feedback reinforcement" of algorithmic life: Recommendation algorithms capture your fear, envy, and greed, continuously pushing content that triggers emotional fluctuations. Your "internal entanglement" becomes the algorithm's most precise handle. Without understanding the nature of the internal entanglement, one becomes a complete slave to algorithms and one's own neurotransmitters.

The reason contemporary people urgently need the concept of 纏 is that it offers a ultimate return of responsibility: It tells us: stop waiting for a perfect external environment, and stop trying to attain peace by controlling the external world. The battlefield of liberation is not outside the body; it is in the present moment of every single arising thought. As long as the inner "著缠" (clinging entanglements) scatter and fall away, even amid the noise of a cubicle farm, the mind can remain independent and free.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: Equating 纏 with External Circumstances or Relationships

* Common formulation: "This toxic relationship is entangling me," "This awful job is suffocating me." * Clarification: The canon explicitly emphasizes "外缠结非缠" (external tangles are not the bondage) [0]. External people, things, and events are only "conditions" (緣) or "objects" (the five desires) [0]. What truly "entangles" you is your dependence on that relationship, your fear of losing security, or your clinging to fame and status—that is, the internal greed, hatred, and delusion [0]. If the inner clinging is not cut off, then even if you change jobs or change partners, the same entanglement will clone itself into the new scenario.

Misreading Two: Thinking That "Untying 纏" Means Passive Withdrawal and Abandoning All External Things

* Common formulation: Since "grasping after wealth, treasures, wife, and children" is entanglement, should I quit my job, abandon my wife and children, and donate all my money to be liberated? * Clarification: The canon points out that the true bond is "染污心顾念" (grasping with a defiled mind) [0]. The key lies in that "defiled mind" and "grasping" (clinging and attachment), not in the external objects themselves. What the wise do is "对于此诸法,不顾念而去" (toward these dharmas, depart without grasping) [0]—the "not grasping" here means releasing, deep within the mind, the possessiveness, the urge to control, and the rigid expectations toward external things, maintaining clarity and independence of mind—not blindly escaping social responsibility in outward behavior.

Misreading Three: Thinking That "Figuring It Out" or Some Attitude Adjustment Can "Untie 纏"

* Common formulation: "I know greed, hatred, and delusion are bad. I've read enough self-help. I just need to calm my attitude." * Clarification: When the canon gives the path for "untying 纏," its structure is extremely rigorous—by no means empty talk about attitude, but rather a systematic set of cultivation steps: 1. 持戒 (establishing discipline / receiving and upholding pure precepts): First, one must set boundaries in behavior, stopping evil deeds and severe negligence—this is the solid foundation for untying 纏 [0]. 2. 修慧 (cultivating wisdom within the mind / internal cultivation of right awakening): Through deep observation of the impermanence (無常, anitya), suffering (苦, duḥkha), and non-self (無我, anātman) of body-and-mind phenomena, one eradicates at the root the erroneous cognition of all things (delusion) [0]. 3. 正念与不放逸 (right mindfulness (samyak-smṛti) and diligence (apramāda)—"with right mindfulness remove the dust, guard the mind, and do not be negligent"): In daily life, maintain keen awareness; when the "inner dust" of greed, hatred, and delusion first sprouts, see through it and dissolve it with right mindfulness, not allowing it to coil up and take root [0].

Only through this rigorous cultivation of "establishing discipline, cultivating wisdom internally, and practicing diligently" can one truly achieve "是人能解结" (this person is able to untie the knots)—causing the chains that bind life fast to snap off one by one, returning to the mind its original vastness and purity [0].

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在佛教经典中,“缠”(paryavasthāna)被描述为束缚众生心灵、使其无法解脱的内在烦恼。根据《杂阿含经》的论述,缠的本质并非外在的物理束缚,而是源于众生内心的染污与执着。这种内在的缠缚如同无形的锁链,牢牢系缚着众生的心识,使其在生死轮回中流转不息,无法获得真正的解脱。

二、主要阐述

《杂阿含经》对“缠”这一概念的阐述具有鲜明的层次,主要从内外束缚的辨析、缠缚的实质与危害,以及解缠的修行路径三个维度展开: 1. 内外束缚的辨析:经典严格区分了“外在束缚”与“内在缠缚”,明确指出真正的缠缚在内而不在外。经中指出,外在的缠绕并非真正的缠缚,唯有内心的缠绕才会真正系缚众生。同样地,外在身体的萦髻只是名义上的萦髻,而内心的萦髻才是真正结缚众生的根源。世间有形的“绳鏁杻械”(如绳索、枷锁等)并不能算作坚固的束缚,真正长久、牢固且令人难以解脱的,是众生以“染污心”去顾念“钱财宝妻子”以及对“世间五欲乐”的深重执着。此外,魔众亦常试图以“长绳羂”来设下圈套,以此比喻和企图束缚修行者。 2. 缠缚的实质与危害:经文揭示了缠缚的实质即是“贪、瞋、痴”三毒,并生动地说明了其对众生的危害。经中指出,“贪欲瞋恚痴”能够“结缚士夫心”,这些内在的烦恼“内发还自伤”,其危害就如同竹子和芦苇结实后反而导致自身枯死一样。同时,经文将“贪欲”、“瞋恚”、“愚痴”称为“尘”或“尘垢”,强调它们并非世间的普通尘土,而是能使众生之心“随外缘,乱想而流驰”的内在染污,具有极强的破坏性。 3. 解缠与断缚的修行路径:针对如何解开内心的缠缚,经文提出了系统性的修行方法。首先是“持戒与修慧”,修行者若要解开内心的缠缚或“萦髻”,必须“建立戒”(或“受持于净戒”),并“内心修智慧”(或“内心修正觉”),同时“勤修习”与“专精勤方便”。其次是“远离五欲与不顾念”,对于钱财、妻子等世间五欲的束缚,智者应当做到“不顾念”,以此“断诸缚,安隐永超世”。最后是“保持正念与不放逸”,修行者应在自身中“正念除尘垢”,于如来的法律中“持心莫放逸”,调伏乐世之心,舍离不乐心。当修行者达到“烦恼悉断坏”的境界时,便能“度生死淤泥,著缠悉散落”,获得彻底的解脱。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《杂阿含经》的不同卷期或同经异译的表述中,对于“缠”及相关修行方法的用词存在细微的分歧与多样性: 1. 关于内心缠缚的隐喻:在描述内心的纠葛与束缚时,经文有的地方表述为“内缠缠众生”,而在其他部分则表述为“内心萦髻者,是结缚众生”。 2. 关于持戒的表述:在论述解缠的戒律基础时,有经文表述为“建立戒”,而另有经文则表述为“受持于净戒”。 3. 关于智慧的表述:在论述解缠的智慧要求时,有经文表述为“内心修智慧”,而另有经文则表述为“内心修正觉”。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与“结”、“缚”的关系:在经文中,“缠”常与“结”、“缚”并提。如“外缠结非缠”、“结缚士夫心”以及“断诸缚”。它们共同构成了佛教烦恼论中关于束缚、系缚的范畴,皆指代阻碍众生解脱的内在力量。 2. 与“五欲”的关系:五欲(钱财、妻子、世间五欲乐)是产生缠缚的外在对象,而对五欲的“染污心顾念”则是导致内心被缠缚的直接原因。 3. 与“尘垢”的关系:贪、瞋、痴三毒作为缠的实质,在经中被等同于“尘”或“尘垢”,它们能使心随外缘乱想流驰,是修行者必须通过正念清除的对象。

五、代表性原文引用

1. “外缠结非缠,内缠缠众生。” 2. “外身萦髻者,是但名萦髻;内心萦髻者,是结缚众生。” 3. “贪欲瞋恚痴,结缚士夫心……内发还自伤,犹如竹芦实。” 4. “染污心顾念,钱财宝妻子……世间五欲乐,是等非坚缚。若于此诸法,不顾念而去,能断诸缚者,安隐永超世。” 5. “建立戒,内心修智慧,勤修习……是人能解结。” 6. “受持于净戒,内心修正觉,专精勤方便……是人能解结。” 7. “贪欲瞋恚痴,是名世间尘……正念除尘垢,持心莫放逸。” 8. “烦恼悉断坏,度生死淤泥,著缠悉散落。”

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「纏」,以偈頌問答為主要形式,其核心論述可歸為三層:纏之辨分、離纏之道、斷纏之果。

一、纏之辨分:內纏與外纏。經中設問云:「外纏結非纏,內纏纏眾生,今問於瞿曇,誰於纏離纏?」 此偈將纏區分為「外纏結」與「內纏」二類,並明確判定外纏結並非真正之纏縛,唯有內纏方能纏縛眾生。此處「纏結」與「纏」並用,「纏結」偏指外在之結縛相,「纏」則指內在對心之繫縛。經文以「誰於纏離纏」發問,將纏視為眾生所處之現實處境,而離纏則為待解之課題。

二、離纏之道:戒與慧。佛答云:「智者建立戒,內心修智慧,比丘勤修習,於纏能解纏。」 此偈指出離纏之方法為「建立戒」與「內心修智慧」二事並行,而以「勤修習」為實踐態度。值得注意的是,經文用「解纏」而非「斷纏」或「離纏」來描述修行者對纏之對治,「於纏能解纏」一句表明纏並非須先脫離方能處理之外物,而是即於纏中解之,修行與纏縛同處一時。此處術語形式為「解纏」,與問句中之「離纏」形成呼應:問者言「離」,答者言「解」,顯示經文傾向以積極修持(解)取代消極脫離(離)之表述。

三、斷纏之果:煩惱斷壞、著纏散落。另一偈云:「煩惱悉斷壞,度生死淤泥,著纏悉散落,十方尊見我。」 此處「纏」之術語形式為「著纏」,即執著之纏縛,與前二偈單言「纏」略有不同。「著纏悉散落」以「散落」形容纏之解除,意象為繫縛之物片片脫落,非一時頓斷,而是修證功成後自然零落。此偈將「煩惱」與「著纏」並舉,煩惱言「斷壞」,著纏言「散落」,二者用詞有別:煩惱以暴力義之「斷壞」除之,著纏以自然義之「散落」脫之。又此偈以「度生死淤泥」為纏縛解除之效果,將纏與生死流轉直接關聯,纏即令眾生陷於生死淤泥之繫縛力。

綜觀三偈,《雜阿含經》論纏之術語形式包括:「纏」「纏結」「內纏」「外纏」「著纏」「解纏」「離纏」,未見使用「纏縛」「纏蓋」等後出論書常見之複合詞。其論述特色在於:以內外之分界定纏之實質所在(內纏方為真纏),以戒慧並修為離纏之正道,以煩惱斷壞、著纏散落為究竟之果。全經未對纏作數目上之分類(如後世論書之十纏等),亦未將纏與隨眠、結、使等煩惱異名作系統辨析,而是以偈頌之精簡形式,直指纏為內心之繫縛、離纏在戒慧勤修這一實踐要旨。

大智度論T1509 · 釋經論部

《大智度論》論「纏」,首先給出明確的術語清單:十纏,即瞋纏、覆罪纏、睡纏、眠纏、戲纏、掉纏、無慚纏、無愧纏、慳纏、嫉纏,逐一點名,是該論對纏最核心的列舉形式。緊接著,論主將纏的外延擴大:「一切煩惱結繞心故,盡名為纏」,亦即凡能纏縛、繞縛於心者,不論名目,皆可攝入纏的範疇;十纏是狹義列舉,「結繞心」則是廣義定義。

在纏的數量上,《大智度論》並列兩說:「有人言十纏,有人言五百纏」,顯示論主所見傳承對纏的開合不同,論中未加裁斷,僅並存之。此處「五百纏」一說與《犢子兒阿毘曇》相合——該論中「結使亦同纏,有五百」,即結、使、纏三者同數,皆為五百。

論中又將纏置於更大的煩惱體系中加以定位。煩惱的定義為「能令心煩,能作惱故」;煩惱分內外二著:內著為五見、疑、慢等,外著為婬、瞋等,無明則內外共。復有二種結(屬愛、屬見)、三種(屬婬、屬瞋、屬癡)之分。在數目統攝上,論引《迦旃延子阿毘曇》義:九結、七使合為九十八結,再加十纏,共成「百八煩惱」。由此可見《大智度論》以「纏」為煩惱大類下的一個子目,與結、使並列而各有定數,最終統攝於百八煩惱的總框架中。

就修行面向而言,論云菩薩「能種種方便自斷,亦能巧方便斷他人諸煩惱」,所斷對象明言為「見、纏、煩惱」三者並舉。論中舉例:三人聞毘耶離國菴羅婆利等婬女之名,晝夜專念心著不捨,夢中與從事,覺後悟「彼女不來,我亦不往,而婬事得辦」,遂往問颰陀婆羅菩薩;菩薩答「諸法實爾,皆從念生」,為三人巧說諸法空,三人即得阿鞞跋致。此例說明纏縛的根源在於念著,斷纏的方便在於觀法從念生、體性本空。論末總結此段經義為「能斷種種見、纏及諸煩惱」。

術語形式方面,《大智度論》始終以「纏」字立目,不作「纏縛」「繫縛」等異稱;十纏中「覆罪纏」之「覆罪」為該論特有寫法,「戲纏」「掉纏」亦較簡省,未加「掉舉」全稱。論中引他部時逕稱《迦旃延子阿毘曇》《犢子兒阿毘曇》,以部派論書之名標出異說來源,此為《大智度論》處理名數分歧的慣用體例。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》以「纏」為煩惱現行纏縛於心之義,與「隨眠」構成對舉:隨眠是煩惱潛伏之位,纏是煩惱現起之位。經部師主張「煩惱睡位說名隨眠,於覺位中即名纏」,睡謂「不現行種子隨逐」,覺謂「諸煩惱現起纏心」。論中又引契經「欲貪、欲欲、欲親、欲愛……纏壓於心,是名欲軛」,以「纏壓」一詞狀其逼迫於心之相。

纏之數目,本論並列兩說:《品類足論》說八纏——無慚、無愧、嫉、慳、悔、眠、掉舉、惛沈;毘婆沙宗於前八更加忿、覆,合為十纏。論中逐一定義:嫉謂「於他諸興盛事令心不喜」,慳謂「財法巧施相違令心悋著」,眠謂「令心昧略為性,無有功力執持於身」,忿謂「除瞋及害於情非情令心憤發」,覆謂「隱藏自罪」。十纏各有所從生:無慚、慳、掉舉從貪生,無愧、眠、惛沈從無明起,嫉、忿從瞋起,悔從疑起,覆則有貪等流、無明等流、俱等流三說。

纏之生起,論說三因緣:隨眠未斷未遍知、順境現在前、非理作意起,三力具足便起欲貪纏。在煩惱分類中,纏與結、縛、隨眠、隨煩惱並列為五種異名,論云「即諸煩惱,結、縛、隨眠、隨煩惱、纏,義差別故,復說五種」。纏亦攝入隨煩惱,以「皆隨心為惱亂事故」,且纏與煩惱垢皆從煩惱起,「是故皆立隨煩惱名」。九結中唯取纏之嫉、慳二者立為結,理由是「二唯不善自在起故」,且此二數現行、能為賤貧因、遍顯隨惑、惱亂二部。

所斷方面,論頌云「纏無慚愧眠,惛掉見修斷,餘及煩惱垢,自在故唯修」。又有脩所斷而聖者定不現行之纏,如殺生纏及盜、婬、誑纏,雖屬脩斷,諸聖者必不起。纏之永斷須「由如實見知聖諦方得永斷,離此無餘永斷方便」。論末辨退捨時亦用纏名,如「起欲纏退」「起色纏退」「起無色界諸纏退」。

總之,本論以「纏」專指煩惱現行纏心之位,與隨眠(種子潛伏位)對舉而立;術語形式固定作「某纏」(欲貪纏、殺生纏等),動詞用法為「纏心」「纏壓於心」;數目取八纏或十纏,皆攝入隨煩惱,通見修二斷或唯修斷。

Related