Dharma · AI Companion

saṃyojana

系缚众生不得解脱的烦恼。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What Is "Saṃyojana" (Fetters / 結)?

In Buddhist soteriology (the path to liberation), Saṃyojana (结 / 結, pronounced *jié* in Chinese) refers to the subtle mental fetters, bindings, and attachments that tie sentient beings to the endless cycle of birth and death (*saṃsāra*).

The term literally means "that which binds or ties together." Just as a rope ties a animal to a post, a *saṃyojana* is a psychical knot of defilement (*kleśa*) that locks a mind into compulsive reaction patterns.

To understand the core position of *saṃyojana* in the path of liberation, one must first clear up a fundamental misunderstanding: External objects are not fetters.

As the *Saṃyukta Āgama* (*雜阿含經*) points out: > *"The eye and forms... these are called 'things tied by fetters' (結所繫法). The desire and greed (欲貪) born in between them—that is the actual fetter (結法)."*

In modern terms, your smartphone, your relationship, your mortgage, or your favorite food are not "fetters" in themselves. Rather, it is the invisible, internal impulse—the habitual greed, aversion, deluded mental proliferation (*papañca* / 不實戲論), and clung-to identity—that acts as the real shackle.


The Anatomical Structure of Fetters

Classical texts categorize fetters in multiple ways to map how deep their roots go into the psyche:

``` ┌── 1. Stinginess (慳 / macchariya) ┌── Two Fetters ─┤ │ (Universal) └── 2. Envy / Jealousy (嫉 / issā) │ │ ┌── 1. Craving (愛 / kāma-rāga or bhava-rāga) │ ├── 2. Aversion / Ill Will (恚 / paṭigha) │ ├── 3. Conceit / Pride (慢 / māna) │ ├── 4. Ignorance (無明 / avijjā) │ ├── 5. Wrong Views (見 / diṭṭhi) SAṂYOJANA ────────────┼── 6. Attachment to Views/Rules (他取 / sīlabbata-parāmāsa) (結) ├── 7. Skeptical Doubt (疑 / vicikicchā) │ ├── 8. Envy (嫉 / issā) │ └── 9. Stinginess (慳 / macchariya) │ │ ┌── Lower 5 (Lower Realms) └── Ten Fetters ─┤ - Identity view, Doubt, Rites/Rituals, Sensual Lust, Ill Will (Classical) └── Higher 5 (Form/Formless Realms & Subtle Ego) - Desire for Form, Desire for Formless, Conceit, Restlessness, Ignorance ```

1. The Universal "Two Fetters": Stinginess (慳) and Envy (嫉) According to the *Madhyama Āgama* (*中阿含經*), whether a being is a human, a heavenly deity (*deva*), an *asura*, or a ghost, all universally long for a life without conflict, anger, or suffering. Yet they remain perpetually embroiled in suffering due to two fundamental fetters: Stinginess (unwillingness to share what one has) and Envy (inability to tolerate what others possess).

*Root Cause:* The Sutra explicitly notes that these two arise directly from "Love and Non-love" (愛、不愛)—our reflexive liking (clinging) and disliking (aversion) toward sensory experiences.

2. The "Nine Fetters" (九結) As systematized by Śāriputra in the *Saṃyukta Āgama*, these represent the nine-fold web of mental bindings: * Craving (愛結): Attachment across sensory and mental realms. * Aversion/Ill Will (恚結): Resistance and hatred toward unpleasant states. * Conceit/Pride (慢結): The subtle or overt psychological comparison ("I am better/worse/equal"). * Ignorance (無明結): Unawareness of the Three Marks of Existence and Four Noble Truths. * Wrong Views (見結): Holding onto identity views (*satkāyadṛṣṭi*). * Attachment to Views/Rites (他取結 / 戒禁取結): Misapprehending superstitious habits or rules as spiritual liberation. * Skeptical Doubt (疑結): Cynical hesitation that blocks true insight. * Envy (嫉結): Resenting others' prosperity. * Stinginess (慳結): Defensive hoarding.

3. The Ten Fetters (十結 / 十纏縛) In the classical *Sutta* and *Abhidharma* frameworks, the ten fetters are split into two operational tiers: * The Five Lower Fetters (下分結): Identity view, doubt, attachment to rituals, sensual craving, and ill-will. Severing these ensures one never returns to the lower, sensory realms (achieving the stage of Non-Returner / *Anāgāmi*). * The Five Higher Fetters (上分結): Craving for fine-material existence, craving for formless existence, conceit, restlessness (*auddhatya*), and fundamental ignorance (*avijjā*). Severing these marks the attainment of full liberation (*Arahantship*).


The Parable of the Leashed Dog (狗系柱喻)

In the *Saṃyukta Āgama*, the Buddha offers a vivid parable to demonstrate how fetters function psychologically:

Imagine a dog tied by a leash to a thick wooden post. Because the leash binds it tightly, the dog can only run in circles around the post. Whether it sits, stands, or lies down, it remains forever within the radius of that post.

In this metaphor: * The Post represents the Five Aggregates (*skandhas*: body, feeling, perception, mental formations, consciousness). * The Leash represents Fetters / Craving (*saṃyojana* / *taṇhā*). * The Dog represents the uninstructed person.

When we do not see clearly how our body and mind operate, we develop a deep-seated craving for them. Thus, wherever our thoughts, emotions, or bodily sensations go, our sense of "self" blindly circles around them. Even when we attempt to escape through work, romance, or entertainment, we are merely pacing around the same post.


A Walkthrough of Modern Life

To see how fetters manifest in everyday life, let us trace a common modern scenario: Scrolling on social media during a late-night work break.

``` [External World: Post / Notification] ──► (Sensory Input: Eye + Form) │ ▼ [Mental Reaction] ───────────────► Greed / Aversion / Comparison │ ▼ [Fetter Formed] ─────────────────► Inner Knot (Saṃyojana) │ ▼ [Compulsive Action] ─────────────► Doomscrolling / Mental Exhaustion ```

1. The Trigger (Sensory Contact): You are tired from working late. You open a social app and see a former college classmate posting photos of a luxury vacation in Europe, complete with a caption celebrating a recent career promotion. * *The Buddhist Distinction:* The screen, the pixels, the classmate, and your eyes are simply "things tied by fetters" (結所繫法). They are ethically neutral facts.

2. The Fetter Ignites: * Envy (嫉結): A sharp, subtle pang hits your stomach. *Why do they get to relax while I am stuck working?* * Conceit/Pride (慢結): You think, *I was actually smarter than them in school. This is unfair.* * Stinginess (慳結): You hesitate to double-tap or "like" the post, withholding validation out of inner bitterness. * Aversion (恚結): You close the app in a mood of low-grade irritation, feeling resentful toward your job and life. * Proliferation / Unreal Play of Mind (不實戲論): Your mind builds an entire story: *I am going to end up a failure. Everyone else is succeeding except me.*

3. The Delusion of Mismapping: * The Common Mistake: You blame the app ("Social media is evil") or your classmate ("They are arrogant"). You try to resolve the pain by throwing your phone aside or deleted the app in rage. * The Buddhist Insight: Deleting an app does not sever a fetter. The fetter was never the phone; it was the inner knot of greedy identification and ego comparison (內心縈髻) that reacted to the phone. If you do not resolve the internal *saṃyojana*, the exact same fetter will manifest tomorrow when a coworker gets praised in an email thread.


Why Contemporary People Need This Concept

Contemporary culture excels at identifying external problems while systematically ignoring internal bindings. We optimize our tools, upgrade our devices, and reconfigure our relationships, yet we wonder why mental exhaustion (*dukkha*) persists.

``` ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ ALGORITHMIC LIFE vs. THE PATH │ ├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Algorithmic Environment : Feeds the Fetter → Delivers temporary hit │ │ → Deepens the addiction (Loop) │ │ │ │ Mindful Insight (Dhamma) : Observes the Fetter → Unpacks the origin │ │ → Dissolves the knot (Liberation) │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ```

1. Understanding the "Algorithmic Capture" of the Mind: Modern digital technology is specifically designed to exploit human *saṃyojana*. Algorithms operate by targeting your Craving (愛) and Aversion (恚) to maximize screen time. When you understand the concept of fetters, you realize that being perpetually outraged or addicted online is not just a habit—it is a literal loss of internal sovereignty. You are the dog circling the digital post.

2. Therapeutic Limit vs. Spiritual Liberation: Modern psychology and neuroscience excel at mapping cognitive biases and emotional triggers. They can help you manage anxiety, reframe negative thoughts, or build healthier habits. * *The Limit:* Scientific self-improvement typically aims to make the "ego" more comfortable within the world. * *The Dhamma Insight:* Buddhist teachings point out that as long as the underlying Identity View (薩迦耶見) and Ignorance (無明) remain untouched, you are simply decorating the cage. Fetters cannot be managed away forever; they must be clearly seen and severed at the root.

3. Freedom Is Not "Having Everything," But "Being Tied by Nothing": Modern life equates freedom with having maximum options: more money, more choices, more experiences. The Dhamma reverses this definition: true freedom (*mokṣa* / 解脫) is the state of "All Fetters Ended" (諸結已盡). A person with modest means whose mind is untied experiences infinitely deeper peace than a billionaire bound by anxiety, pride, and fear of loss.


Common Misunderstandings & Clarifications

1. "Does severing fetters mean I must become a cold, emotionless hermit?"

Clarification: No. Fetters are not healthy feelings or natural cognitive functions; they are *toxic compulsions born of delusion*. When a person severs the fetters of aversion (恚) and envy (嫉), what remains is not an emotional void, but unshakeable goodwill (*mettā*), compassion (*karuṇā*), and sympathetic joy (*muditā*). You do not stop caring about people; you stop using people to feed your ego or projecting your anxieties onto them.

2. "Are material objects, wealth, or relationships the fetters themselves?"

Clarification: This is the most widespread error. In the classical texts, sensory objects are explicitly designated as *things bound by fetters*, not the fetters themselves. Money, family, and art are neutral conditions. The fetter is the obsessive clinging, possessiveness, and deluded projection (愛樂、染污心顧念) you wrap around them. Renunciation in Buddhism is primarily an *internal untying*, not merely an external escape.

3. "Can science or brain hacks sever my fetters for me?"

Clarification: While neuroscience can measure neural correlates of craving or fear, and pharmacology can calm an overactive nervous system, physical interventions cannot replace wisdom (*paññā*). A fetter is fundamentally an issue of cognitive misunderstanding—holding a false view of reality (*avidyā*). A drug may suppress anxiety temporarily, but it cannot cultivate the direct, experiential insight into impermanence (*anicca*) and non-self (*anattā*) required to dismantle identity views.


Summary: The Path to Untying the Knot

In the *Saṃyukta Āgama*, the Buddha poses a crucial question: How does one untie an inner knot woven so tightly over time?

The answer lies in cultivating the Noble Eightfold Path and developing "Direct Knowledge as It Really Is" (如實知) regarding the five aggregates:

$$\text{Observing Aggregates} \longrightarrow \text{Seeing Origination \& Cessation} \longrightarrow \text{Recognizing Gratification \& Danger} \longrightarrow \text{Severing Fetters (Dispassionate Release)}$$

When you observe a moment of anger, envy, or greed in daily life, do not judge yourself, nor simply suppress it. Recognize it clearly: *"This is a fetter arising."* By seeing how it causes suffering, how it is impermanent, and how it is not your true identity, the mind naturally relaxes its grip. Step by step, knot by knot, the bindings unravel until the mind tastes absolute, unshakeable freedom: All fetters exhausted; peace realized.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

「结」(saṃyojana)在佛教经典中被阐释为系缚众生于生死轮回、阻碍解脱的不善烦恼。其核心要义在于「系缚」与「执著」。

在《中阿含经》中,结被明确定义为「诸结不善」,与「缚」(系缚)具有不可分割的关系。经中指出,修行者若在修行中对与欲念相对应的作意产生爱乐,即属于乐于「结缚」,只要结未彻底断除,便仍处于「缚」的状态而非解脱;唯有在「诸结已尽」时,方可称为真正的解脱。此外,达到「不动心解脱」的境界,亦表现为「一切有结尽」。

《杂阿含经》则将结视为将众生缠缚于生死流转中的核心力量。经中区分了「结法」与「结所系法」,指出六入处及其对境本身并非结,而是众生对这些对境所产生的「欲贪」才是真正的「结法」。

《大宝积经》进一步指出,结的根源在于贪爱与执著。众生对眼、耳、鼻、舌、身所识的五欲产生贪爱与执著,而「夫执著者名之为结」。该经对结给出了多重等价的定义:「结名发起,发起名缚,又亦名为不实戏论」,众生正是被这种不实戏论的诸缚所遍缚,因而无法解脱。

二、 主要阐述

各经从不同的角度对「结」的分类、系缚机制以及断除方式进行了深入的阐述:

1. 结的分类与表现形式 - 二结(悭与嫉):根据《中阿含经》的记载,天、人、阿修罗、乾闼婆、罗刹等不同生命形态的众生,皆普遍具有「二结」,即「悭」(悭贪)与「嫉」(嫉妒)。众生虽渴望无结、无怨、无恚、无苦的安乐生活,却因这二结的作祟,实际上依然处于有结、有怨、有恚、有苦的境地。 - 九结:在《杂阿含经》中,舍利弗将结系统化地分类为「九结」,即:爱结、恚结、慢结、无明结、见结、他取结、疑结、嫉结、悭结。 - 十种缠缚:《大宝积经》中则提到了「十种缠缚」,其中包括悭嫉网、无明膜、烦恼迷醉、爱欲驶流等,众生被这些缠缚所系,而菩提修行则是为了证得「无缠无缚法」。

2. 结的系缚机制与生死轮回 - 无明与爱结的缠缚:《杂阿含经》指出,众生在无始生死中,因「无明所盖,爱结所系」而在长夜中轮回,无法得知苦的边际。即使世间经历大旱、大海枯竭、须弥山崩落、大地败坏,只要爱结不断,众生的生死轮回就不会停止。 - 狗系柱喻:《杂阿含经》以「狗子系柱」来生动比喻结的系缚。狗因被绳子系在柱子上,便只能围绕着柱子旋转、或住或卧。同样地,凡愚众生因不如实知「色、受、想、行、识」五阴及其集、灭、味、患、离,对五阴产生贪欲与爱念,因而随五阴而转,无法解脱生老病死等种种忧悲恼苦。 - 内心萦髻与染污心:《杂阿含经》强调,真正的系缚并非外在的绳索,而是内心的纠葛(「内心萦髻者,是结缚众生」)。对钱财、妻子及世间五欲的「染污心顾念」,才是最坚固且难解的系缚。 - 色缚与妄想:《大宝积经》以「色缚」为例,说明众生对自身所得的诸色妄起「我想、命者之想、数取趣想、常想恒想、不变异想、实想全想、一合之想」等妄想,并对自我自体相深加亲宝珍重、广兴我爱,对妻妾等女色恋著不已,这便是结缚的具体表现。

3. 断结与解脱之道 - 修行者的核心目标:《中阿含经》中多次将「断诸结」视为修行者的核心特质。如阿难指出,优秀比丘的特点之一便是其所说之法与正法相应,「欲断诸结」;舍梨子也提到,若能守护自身,使「诸结非我有」,便能不生不善之漏。 - 修习八正道与如实知:《杂阿含经》中,舍利弗指出应修习、多修习「八正道」以断除九结;多闻圣弟子若能如实知五阴及其集、灭、味、患、离,便能脱离五阴,解脱一切痛苦。 - 菩萨的戒行与断结:《大宝积经》中,菩萨通过持守特定的戒律来帮助众生断除结缚。例如,持「不系缚戒」是为了让一切众生「断结使缚」;持「不鞭杖戒」是为了「远离诸魔结使留难」;菩萨自身或劝他人行释放之事,则是为了在坐菩提树下时能够「破坏一切魔结使」。 - 证得阿罗汉与不生三界:当修行者「离欲断诸结」、「一切结尽」时,便能摧伏魔军,达到涅槃,永不复生,成就阿罗汉。在《大宝积经》中,若能「不见有诸结」,则「后能不生有」,即不再受生于三界之中,从而达到身心清净的境界。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典及译本中,关于「结」的术语形式和用词存在明显的差异:

1. 术语形式的差异: - 《中阿含经》:除了最常用的单字「结」之外,还出现了「结缚」(描述与欲念相对应的烦恼状态)、「有结」(指代尚未断除烦恼的束缚状态)以及「结使」(如偈颂中称佛陀为「尊断诸结使」者)。 - 《杂阿含经》:使用了「结法」与「结所系法」的对立概念,并使用「九结」来系统化分类。此外,常将「爱结」与「无明」并列,并将阿罗汉的成就描述为「尽诸有结」或「断诸有结」。 - 《大宝积经》:频繁使用「结使」、「结使缚」或「魔结使」等术语,并提出了「十种缠缚」的概念。 2. 核心概念的译词差异: - 关于众生执著的对象,《杂阿含经》使用的是「五阴」(色、受、想、行、识);而《大宝积经》在阐述「色缚」时,则侧重于对自身诸色妄起「我想、命者之想、数取趣想」等妄想。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 结与爱、不爱:在《中阿含经》中,「悭、嫉」二结是「因爱、不爱,缘爱、不爱,从爱、不爱生,由爱、不爱有」;若能消除对事物的「爱」与「不爱」,则二结不生。在《大宝积经》中,结的产生同样源于对五欲的贪爱。 2. 结与无明:《杂阿含经》中,无明与爱结是相辅相成的。众生「无明所盖,爱结所系」,两者共同构成了众生流转生死的根本动力。 3. 结与缚、缠:结、缚、缠在经典中常互为表里。《中阿含经》将结与缚紧密联系,认为未断结即是处于「结缚」之中;《大宝积经》则直接将结、缚、不实戏论等同,并以「十种缠缚」来描述烦恼的网罗。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《中阿含经》:“諸結不善……若有比丘行捨,生與欲相應作意,樂彼結縛……諸結已盡,是謂解脫。” 2. 《中阿含经》:“各各有二結。云何為二?一曰慳,二曰嫉……慳、嫉因愛、不愛,緣愛、不愛,從愛、不愛生,由愛、不愛有。” 3. 《杂阿含经》:“眼及色……是名結所繫法。此中欲貪,是其結也。” 4. 《杂阿含经》:“眾生無始生死,無明所蓋,愛結所繫,長夜輪迴,不知苦之邊際……譬如狗子繫柱,期轉圍繞,不離於柱。” 5. 《大宝积经》:“夫執著者名之為結。結名發起,發起名縛,又亦名為不實戲論。” 6. 《大宝积经》:“不見有諸結,後能不生有。”

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

本經《中阿含經》對「結」這一概念的論述,散見於多處經文,呈現出幾個鮮明的側面:

一、「結」之界定與性質:經中明確將「結」定位為繫縛眾生、障礙解脫的煩惱。經中佛陀明言:「諸結不善,結不善故,我說是縛,不說解脫」;反之,「諸結已盡……我說解脫,不說是縛」。此一公式為本經對「結」的核心表述——以「不善」定性「結」,以「盡」判定解脫。「結」與「縛」在本經中幾乎可互換使用,如「愛樂結縛」一詞多次出現。

二、「結」之具體分類:本經特別提出「二結」之說,即「慳」與「嫉」——「天、人、阿修羅、揵沓惒、羅剎及餘種種身,各各有二結,慳及嫉也」。此說以最簡約的兩種煩惱涵蓋一切有情之繫縛,並進一步說明:「慳、嫉者,因愛、不愛,緣愛、不愛,從愛、不愛生,由愛、不愛有。若無愛、不愛者,則無慳、嫉也」——揭示「結」以「愛、不愛」為因緣的根本生起機制。

三、「斷結」之修學實踐:經中多次出現「欲斷諸結」之語,描述比丘聞法修行之目標。另有一段經文記述舍梨子回答世尊問難時,舉出此一面向:「若諸結沙門所說,彼結非我有,行如是守護,如其守護已,不生不善漏」——以「結非我有」之正觀,配合守護根門,使不善漏不生。此中亦用「結使」一詞(見「斷諸結使」之語),與「結」並用,皆指繫縛之煩惱。

四、「結」與解脫之辨析:本經以細膩方式辨析何為真解脫、何仍為繫縛。即便比丘行捨,若「生欲相應念,愛樂結縛」,無論是「樂是」或「不樂是」,亦無論是否「意忘」,只要結縛未盡,「我說是縛,不說解脫」。此顯示本經對「結」之去除持嚴格標準——非僅暫伏,須究竟盡,方名解脫。同卷並以「凡夫樂」為「病本、癰本、箭刺之本」,以「聖樂、無欲樂、離樂、息樂、正覺之樂」為可修、可習、可廣布者,以「樂」之染淨對顯「結」之有無。

五、術語特色:本經論「結」時兼用「結縛」、「結使」、「諸結」等複合詞,其中「結縛」一詞尤為突出,強調「結」本質上即為一種繫縛作用。本經以「結」為核心煩惱名稱,並以「結不善」、「結已盡」構成判斷繫縛與解脫之關鍵語句。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》對「結」的論述,可歸納為以下幾個要點:

一、結的具體內容:九結

經中明確列舉「結」所包含的具體煩惱。舍利弗回答閻浮車所問時說:「結者,九結,謂愛結、恚結、慢結、無明結、見結、他取結、疑結、嫉結、慳結。」()這是本經對「結」最核心、最完整的定義。「結」在本經中即指此九種煩惱,用以繫縛眾生、令不得解脫。

二、斷結之道:八正道

在定義九結之後,舍利弗緊接著說:「有道有向,修習多修習,斷此結耶?……謂八正道——正見乃至正定。」()可見斷除九結的方法即是修習八正道,從正見到正定。

三、結與取、縛、使等概念並列

在同一段對話中,閻浮車依次問及扼、取、縛、結、使、欲等概念。其中取為「四取」(欲取、我取、見取、戒取),縛為「四縛」(貪欲縛、瞋恚縛、戒取縛、我見縛),使為「七使」(貪欲使、瞋恚使、有愛使、慢使、無明使、見使、疑使),斷除之道皆為八正道。()這種並列方式顯示出本經將「結」視為繫縛眾生煩惱的一個特定分類名稱,與取、縛、使各有分際,而內容亦不盡相同——如「結」有九種,「取」僅四種,「縛」僅四種。

四、內結與外纏的區別

經中以偈頌形式提出:「外纏結非纏,內纏纏眾生。」()區分了外纏結與內纏,強調真正繫縛眾生的是內在的纏結,而非外在的纏結。此處「纏結」連用,可見「纏」與「結」在意義上相通,但經文仍就內外作了明確劃分。

五、斷結與證果的關係

本經多次強調「斷諸結」是證得阿羅漢的關鍵:「斷除一切結,得成阿羅漢。」()描述阿羅漢特質時又說:「盡諸有結」()、「斷諸有結」()、「一切結盡,得阿羅漢」(),以及「離欲斷諸結,涅槃不復生」、「離欲斷諸結,涅槃永不生,持此最後身,摧伏眾魔軍」(、),皆將斷結與離欲、涅槃、不受後有、摧伏魔軍等成就並提,顯示斷結為究竟解脫不可或缺之條件。

六、偈頌中的「離結」表述

經中亦以「離結」表達解脫境界,如「離結觀察來,斷流不復縛」(、)、「斷愛及名色……離結絕悕望,不見於人天,此世及他世」(),將離結與斷流、斷愛、斷名色、絕悕望並列,呈現解脫者徹底出離繫縛、不復輪迴於此世他世的境界。

綜合而言,本經論「結」,以「九結」之具體列舉為核心定義,以「八正道」為斷除之方,以「盡諸有結/斷諸有結/一切結盡」為阿羅漢之特質,並以「內纏纏眾生」點出繫縛之源在於內心,最後以「離結」之詩偈頌詠解脫境界。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

本部經論述「結」之要點,整理如下:

一、定義與性質:舍利弗對目連明確指出:「惡不善法,起諸邪見,故名為結。」「結」又稱「結使」,與「垢」同義——「除者謂之慧,垢者謂之結」。結使涵蓋貪、瞋、癡三毒,經中常以「貪欲、瞋恚、愚癡」並稱。阿羅漢則「三毒五使永不復現」,顯示「結使」與「三毒」、「五使」互通。

二、結之具體內容:經中以比丘日常事例詳述結使之相,包括欲在他比丘前入村乞食、先前受水得食、與檀越說法,以及隱藏犯戒、不欲他人告誡、欲令四部眾供養等心念,凡此皆被歸為「既有不善,又有貪欲,此二俱不善」。

三、繫縛之喻:經以毘摩質多羅阿須倫王「五繫」為喻——其心生「諸天法整」之念即自覺身無縛繫、五欲自娛;轉念「諸天非法」則五繫復現、五欲消滅。此顯示結乃繫於心念、隨念生滅。

四、結與魔之關係:經云「此諸結使是魔境界」,若有比丘在魔境界者終不脫生老病死;心不移動、不著結使便能越出魔界;又偈云「降伏魔力怨,除結無有餘」,「諸結永已除,平等無二心」。

五、斷結之修行:經中提出多種方便——持《增壹》能「除結使如流河」;「智慧能除結,不由其餘行」;具足禁戒、諸根成就,可「漸漸當逮得,一切結使盡」;思惟不淨想能伏欲心而滅結;修無常想能「盡除斷一切諸結」;行慈心能使「諸結漸漸薄」;又偈云「結滅成大果,無復愁苦惱」。

六、斷結之果位階次:經分四種沙門——黃藍花沙門(斷三結,成須陀洹)、邠陀利花沙門(三結盡、婬怒癡薄,成斯陀含)、柔軟沙門(斷五下分結,成阿那含)、柔軟中柔軟沙門(有漏盡成無漏心解脫,為阿羅漢);辟支佛亦「去諸結使,更不受胎」。又有「心意寂然,降伏諸結」之江迦葉,及「結盡永無餘」之禪定功德。

七、用詞說明:本經以「結」、「結使」、「諸結」並用,三者互通。「三結」、「五下分結」為具體分類。結使又常與三毒、五使並稱,涵蓋貪瞋癡等根本煩惱。經中亦有以「纏裹」、「縛」、「繫」等喻詞描述結之繫縛功能,如「為欲所纏裹」,與概念定義相呼應。

Related