Dharma · AI Companion

利養

lābha

信众供给修行者的财物资具。AI-generated

Type PhenomenaDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

One-sentence definition: 利养 (lābha, "offerings and fame") refers to the material offerings and renown that a practitioner receives; in Buddhism, it possesses the dual nature of both meritorious reward and the danger of triggering attachment.

In Buddhism, 利养 is not simply equivalent to what modern people call "money" or "wealth"; its meaning has a very rigorous structure and dimensionality. In the definitions found in classical scriptures and treatises, 利养 is primarily woven from two core parts:

1. Concrete material offerings: In the early scriptures, this concretely appears as the four requisite offerings (or the often-mentioned three) that sustain a renunciant's life and practice: food, clothing, bedding (and medicine). This is the physical basis for maintaining life and carrying out practice. 2. The accompanying mental and social returns: namely the fame, reputation, and social status that derive from receiving offerings or displaying virtuous conduct (often called "name," "renown," or "gaining a name" in the scriptures).

In the full panorama of the path to liberation, 利养 is an entity of great dialectical tension and trial. The scriptures present it as possessing a dual nature:

* From the giver's perspective (positive merit): Giving food, clothing, bedding, and other 利养 in accordance with the Dharma to precept-holders or those worthy of offerings (such as respectfully supporting one's parents, or making offerings to the "field-of-merit fire" (福田火)) has extremely sublime merit. The scriptures describe this merit as following one like a shadow, the true companion of life ("true companion"), serving as provisions for the next life ("provisions for the next world"), enabling one to walk without danger, to encounter no calamity in one's lifetime, to have one's name spread in the present life, and to be reborn in heaven after death. At the level of society and the bodhisattva's work of saving beings, it can even gather sentient beings and maintain worldly ethics and order through the "bestowal of benefit" (行利, i.e., 利行, beneficial action) and "shared benefit" (同利, i.e., 同事, co-operation) among the four means of gathering (四攝事, *catvāri saṃgraha-vastūni*). * From the recipient's perspective (the danger of wrong livelihood): If a practitioner develops greed and attachment toward 利养 and deliberately pursues it, 利养 instantly transforms into a destructive poison grass, condemned as "the root of all evil, capable of destroying all wholesome dharmas" (眾惡根本,能壞一切善法).

The Unique One-to-One Corresponding Similes in the Scriptures

To warn with vivid imagery of the destructive nature of clinging to 利养, the scriptures (such as 《杂阿含经》, the *Saṃyuktāgama*) preserve a set of rigorous one-to-one corresponding similes that must not be arbitrarily confused or flattened:

* The plantain dies upon bearing fruit (芭蕉生果即死): Once a plantain tree flowers and bears fruit, its trunk withers and dies; likewise, once a deluded person greedily accepts unearned 利养, his life of merit comes to an end. * Bamboo and reed die upon bearing fruit (竹、蘆生果即死): When bamboo and reeds flower and bear fruit, that is also the day the whole plant moves toward death; craving 利养 thoroughly destroys the practitioner's wholesome roots. * The mule must die upon conceiving (駏驉受胎必死): Once a 駏驉 (a mule-like beast) becomes pregnant, the time of giving birth is the day the mother's belly splits and she dies; likewise, once a foolish man carries greed for 利养 in his belly, he is certain to bring upon himself the suffering of the long night and the destruction of life.

Through these three natural phenomena, the scriptures warn: 利养 is to practice like conceiving a fatal fruit or fetus—obtaining it is the very beginning of moving toward ruin.

The Position of 利养 in the Chain of Dependent Origination and Causality

In 《长阿含经》 (Dīrghāgama), the Buddha, through rigorous logical deduction, finely embeds "gain" (利, benefit and acquisitions) within the chain of dependent origination and causality running from sentient beings' afflictions to social conflict:

因爱有求 → 因求有利 → 因利有用 → 因用有欲 → 因欲有著 → 因著有嫉 → 因嫉有守 → 因守有护 *"Because of craving there is seeking; because of seeking there is gain; because of gain there is using; because of using there is desire; because of desire there is attachment; because of attachment there is envy; because of envy there is guarding; because of guarding there is defense."*

1. Because of craving there is seeking; because of seeking there is gain: 利养 does not fall from the sky; its root is inner craving (愛), from which arises outward searching and contention (求), thereby producing the acquisition of benefit (利). 2. Because of gain there is using; because of using there is desire: Once benefit is obtained, one consumes and uses it (用); in the process of enjoying and using, a deeper layer of greed and desire arises (欲). 3. Because of desire there is attachment; because of attachment there is envy: Greed triggers a firm psychological clinging (著); after clinging, one fears being surpassed or deprived by others, giving rise to envy (嫉). 4. Because of envy there is guarding; because of guarding there is defense: Because of envy, one schemes to monopolize and protect (守); ultimately, to defend the benefits in hand, this evolves into violence, conflict, and strife (護).

From the subtle craving within an individual's mind to swords and weapons meeting in the world and social upheaval, the crucial pivot point is precisely the acquisition and use of "gain" (利).

Furthermore, in Mahāyāna scriptures and treatises such as 《大宝积经》 (Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra), the deceitful and wrong-livelihood behaviors brought by "seeking gain" are further revealed:

* Seeking gain through wrong livelihood (邪命求利): The mouth feigns contentment and speaks of profound Dharma, while the mind covets offerings—this belongs to "the mind's many crafty deeds" and "the mouth's many crafty deeds." * The monk-thief (沙門賊): Claiming realization without having realized it, fabricating one's meditative attainments or noble fruits for the sake of fame and gain. * The dog-dharma (狗法): Falsely claiming to be a bodhisattva, developing a possessive mind of "this is my house" when visiting a donor's home, and being jealous of other practitioners.

Craving 利养 causes a practitioner to "change his dignified deportment" (轉易威儀行, altering one's conduct to cater to donors), to lose the four establishments of mindfulness (四念處, *smṛtyupasthāna*) and the four right efforts (四正勤, *samyak-pradhāna*), to regress from already-attained meditative concentration (禪定, *dhyāna*) and liberation (解脫, *vimokṣa*), and to have a mind that wavers "like a wanton woman," finally falling into the evil destinies.


A Walkthrough in Everyday Life

To clarify the precise mapping of 利养 in contemporary life, we need to walk through this concept step by step using scenes that modern people know extremely well—personal-brand building, knowledge monetization, and workplace KPIs.

1. Concept Mapping and Common Misconceptions

* Correct mapping: * Material 利养: Salary, tips, commissions, sponsored goods, and company benefits from one's labor or creative output (corresponding to the food, clothing, and bedding of the scriptures). * Name/fame: Follower counts, industry titles, internet-wide fame, and social status as a lauded "mentor/expert." * Where people most easily map it wrong: * Misconception: Believing that merely earning money or receiving praise means being "poisoned by 利养," or even feeling that pursuing legitimate compensation for labor is evil. * Clarification: Buddhism does not deny the legitimate acquisition of benefit. Earning a salary through Dharma-concordant work, or the public supporting creators of quality content in a Dharma-concordant way, is "Dharma-concordant offering" and "bestowing benefit." The problem is not whether 利养 itself exists, but whether "craving, seeking, and attachment" (愛、求、著) have arisen in the mind.

2. Contemporary Scenario Walkthrough: The Fallen Trajectory of a Knowledge Blogger (or Corporate Elite)

* 【Origin: because of craving there is seeking; because of seeking there is gain】 You initially write articles and make videos out of the original intention to share knowledge or cultivate yourself. Because the content is solid, you attract a large following (gaining a name). Then the platform opens traffic revenue for you, businesses approach you for advertising, and followers begin to tip you (gaining 利养: the contemporary version of food, clothing, and bedding). At this stage, if acquired in accordance with the Dharma, this is itself planting good fruit. * 【Mutation: seeking gain through wrong livelihood and changing one's dignified deportment】 After tasting the feeling of earning tens of thousands a month and being held up by ten thousand admirers, craving arises in the mind. You begin to notice that serious, in-depth content grows followers slowly, while content that manufactures anxiety, caters to vulgar tastes, or even exaggerates attracts enormous traffic. To maintain high income and high attention, you begin to "change your dignified deportment"—altering your positions and speech, saying things against your conscience to cater to the market. Verbally you still proclaim "I'm just sharing purely; I'm not interested in money" (the mouth's many crafty deeds, the mind's many crafty deeds); and even without deep research or genuine experience, you package yourself as an industry authority (the deceit of claiming what has not been attained). * 【Development: because of gain there is using; because of using there is desire; because of desire there is attachment】 With these revenues, you improve your life (using), trading up to luxury cars and large homes, becoming accustomed to extravagance and praise-killing. This using generates stronger consumer desires (desire), and then a bone-deep attachment to the identity of "multi-million-follower influencer / industry big shot" (attachment). At this point, your already-attained focus and inner peace (meditative concentration and wholesome dharmas) begin to regress across the board; the first thing you do upon waking each day is check the data—rejoicing when it rises, worrying when it falls. * 【Eruption: because of attachment there is envy; because of envy there is guarding; because of guarding there is defense】 When a more talented newcomer blogger appears in the same lane, you feel your position threatened and a strong envy arises (envy). To protect your market share (guarding), you begin buying paid trolls to tear down rivals, spreading rumors and smears, and forming exclusive factions within your fan groups (defense). * 【Ending: bearing fruit means death】 Eventually, in an incident where you crash while chasing traffic, your hypocrisy is exposed, your reputation is ruined, and your account is banned. Just as "the plantain dies upon bearing fruit; the mule must die upon conceiving" (芭蕉生果即死,駏驉受胎必死), the very 利养 that once brought you rich returns ultimately becomes the poison that completely crushes your life and spiritual existence.


Why Contemporary People Need It

In today's era, deeply bound by algorithmic recommendation, the traffic economy, KPI assessments, and social media amplifiers, modern people are more densely exposed than any previous era to the seduction and backlash of 利养.

1. The "利养 Trap" of the Algorithm Age

The essence of modern internet algorithms is a vast "利养 feedback mechanism." Every like, share, tip, and traffic monetization is an extremely precise biological dopamine stimulus.

Algorithms capture sentient beings' craving with extreme acuity, rewarding content that stirs emotion, manufactures opposition, and caters to desire with instant "name (traffic)" and "gain (monetization)." Contemporary people easily fall into "seeking gain through wrong livelihood" within this mechanism: abandoning bottom lines for traffic, using any means for clicks.

2. In Comparison with Contemporary Experience: The Perspective of Neuroscience and Behavioral Psychology

In neuroscience and behavioral psychology, the psychological mechanism triggered by 利养 can be compared with "reward circuit" and "hedonic treadmill" (享樂適應, hedonic adaptation):

* The brain's reward and adaptation: When a person obtains money (gain) or social praise (name), the brain's ventral striatum releases dopamine, producing pleasure. However, the brain rapidly develops tolerance to this stimulus (hedonic adaptation); to maintain the same level of pleasure, one must pursue ever greater traffic and more benefits. This perfectly explains the progressive process in the scriptures of "because of gain there is using; because of using there is desire; because of desire there is attachment." * Limitations and boundaries: Neuroscience can measure changes in dopamine and cortisol at the physical level, but it cannot provide a value orientation or an ethical path of liberation for life. Science can tell us "the mechanism by which the brain becomes addicted to praise," but it cannot, as Buddhism does, see through how "seeking gain" destroys a person's inner peace (destroying wholesome dharmas) in the deep psychological structure, nor can it provide a complete path of liberation and remedy.

3. A Key Checkpoint on the Path to Liberation

On the path to liberation, 利养 is the hardest gate for a practitioner to pass when moving from "first arousing the mind" to "deep cultivation of liberation." 《大宝积经》 (Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra) states explicitly: a bodhisattva at the initial stage, if he does not relinquish 利养, cannot grow the power of wisdom (慧力, *prajñā-bala*).

Because external scarcity easily puts one on guard, while external prosperity and praise are like boiling a frog in warm water, destroying "all wholesome dharmas" without one's noticing. Recognizing the danger of 利养 is not about veering into extreme world-weariness, but about establishing an anti-corruption barrier in the mind, so that when facing fame and gain one is not alienated or kidnapped by them.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading One: "Buddhism rejects 利养, so practitioners or good people should live in hardship—unable to earn money or gain fame."

* Clarification: This is a typical narrowing and misunderstanding. The scriptures have never wholly denied the value of 利养.

First, from the giver's perspective, offering 利养 to precept-holders or those worthy of offerings is an extremely sublime means of accumulating merit and securing peace in the next life ("merit is the foundation; sentient beings are secured by it").

Second, from the perspective of society and the bodhisattva path, within the "four means of gathering" (四攝事, *catvāri saṃgraha-vastūni*), the Buddha made "bestowing benefit" (行利) and "sharing benefit" (同利) important means of gathering sentient beings and benefiting society. The scriptures even affirm the case of "multiplying the benefit of oneself and others" when one's capacity is strong.

What Buddhism opposes is absolutely not wealth and fame themselves, but the "greed, wrong-livelihood seeking, and the hatred and envy between gain and loss" directed at 利养.

Misreading Two: "As long as I don't steal or rob, and I earn fame and gain by my own ability, how could I 'destroy all wholesome dharmas'?"

* Clarification: What the scriptures call "destroying wholesome dharmas" reveals an extremely subtle process of psychological erosion.

When you begin to rely on external praise (name) and material feedback (gain) to define your self-worth, your psychological focus has already shifted from "introspection, purity, and few desires" to "external seeking, comparison, and maintenance."

Once you enter this state, you become extremely fragile: rejoicing in gain, grieving in loss. To maintain existing fame and gain, you involuntarily produce envy, exclusivity, and a guarding mind ("because of envy there is guarding; because of guarding there is defense"). This subtle psychological distortion silently dismantles your concentration (meditative concentration), compassion, and pure wisdom (the power of wisdom).

Misreading Three: "The best way to face 利养 is to completely escape—refusing all social interaction and commercial activity."

* Clarification: Escape is only a preliminary remedial means (as when the scriptures mention beginners "dwelling far from villages, abiding in empty places"). But the ultimate wisdom for remedying 利养 is not physical isolation, but the psychological "equal-view" (平等觀) and "cultivation of patience" (修忍):

1. Observe impermanence as it is (如實觀察無常): Recognize that all worldly benefit and fame are "non-permanent dharmas" (impermanence) produced by conditions; gathering and dispersal both have causes and conditions, giving rise to neither wild joy nor sorrow and worry. 2. Cultivate the equal-view (修習平等觀): As 《大宝积经》 points out, when receiving offerings or praise, do not give rise to a mind of love and attachment; one should cultivate the "equal-view." Regard 利养 as a tool for sustaining life and contributing to society, not as capital for self-inflation. 3. Cultivate patience with nothing surpassing it (修忍無過上): When gratified by benefits or facing disputes over them, use forbearance (忍辱, *kṣānti*) to tame the mind's greed and hatred—this is the unsurpassed cultivation.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义 利养(lābha)在佛教概念中,主要指饮食、衣服、卧具等物质供养,以及由此带来的名誉、声望与利益。在经典论述中,利养具有双重属性:一方面,如法施予持戒者或应供者利养,能为施者带来极大的现世与后世福德;另一方面,修行者若对利养产生贪着与追求,则会引发执着、嫉妒、邪命等种种烦恼,甚至退失道果、堕入恶道。因此,如何正确对待利养,是区分清净修行与染污邪命的重要标志。

二、 主要阐述 各部类经典从不同维度对「利养」进行了深入剖析: 1. 如法供养的殊胜功德: 《长阿含经》指出,以「饮食、衣服、卧具」等物资布施给持戒人,能获得极大果报,此福德如影随形,是后世的粮食与安稳根基,能使人一生不遭难、死后升天。在《杂阿含经》中,恭敬供养父母能使人「现世名称流,命终生天上」;供养应供的「福田火」,能增长功德,带来安隐快乐与名称。此外,经典也肯定了在力量强大时倍收「己他利」的情况。 2. 贪着利养的毁灭性过患: 《杂阿含经》以提婆达多贪受阿阇世王丰厚供养为例,警示非分利养会使人「今世则坏,他世亦坏」,犹如芭蕉、竹、芦「生果即死」,又如駏驉「受胎必死」,招致长夜之苦。 《大宝积经》则更系统地将利养斥为「众恶根本」,能坏一切善法。初业菩萨若不舍利养,则无法增长慧力。贪图利养会使修行者忘失四念处、退失四正勤,令已得的禅定、解脱、三昧等退失,心动摇「如婬女」,最终堕入三恶道。为了求利,修行者甚至会「转易威仪行」,得之则喜,失之则忧。 3. 求利过程中的欺诳与邪命: 《大宝积经》揭示了贪求利养者的种种恶行:口中诈言知足而内心贪求,属于「意多奸行」与「口多奸行」的「邪命求利」;未证言证者是「沙门贼」;末世中为名利妄称菩萨、至施主家生「己家想」并嫉妒他人者,被斥为「自称菩萨而行狗法」;「沙门求利」者心常悭惜,所去之处皆为利养而非善法。 4. 对治与舍离的方法: 《大宝积经》提出,菩萨出家应弃舍利养,必须舍离、不得亲近贪利养的四种「福伽罗」。修行者应远离聚落,安住空闲处修空法以防利养心;受供养时应习「平等观」而不生爱心;如实观察利养过失,乐于少欲,方为清净法器。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异 在不同经典及译本中,关于「利养」及相关概念的术语呈现出明显的翻译风格与名相差异: 1. 「利养」的具体名相: 《长阿含经》中多将利养的具体内容表述为「饮食,衣服卧具」,并使用「施」与「供养」指代提供物资的动作。而在论述因果链条时,则单用一个「利」字代表利益或获得物。 2. 「四摄事」的译名差异: 在论述利他与社会伦理时,《杂阿含经》对「四摄事」采用了独特的译名,将通常译为「利行」与「同事」的概念,译为「行利」与「同利」(即「布施及爱语,或有行利者,同利诸行生」)。 3. 名望与声誉的表述: 《杂阿含经》中多处使用「名称」(如「名称流」、「得名称」)来指代名望与声誉,并与「名誉」并用,用以指代与物质利养相伴的精神回报。 4. 独特音译与比喻: 《杂阿含经》使用「福田火」来比喻应受供养的对象。而《大宝积经》在强调舍离贪利养人时,使用了独特的音译术语「福伽罗」(即补特伽罗,意指人),要求修行者不得亲近此四种「福伽罗」。

四、 与相关概念的关系 1. 与「爱」、「求」的因果关系: 《长阿含经》将「利」置于缘起因果链条中,指出「因爱有求,因求有利」。利养并非凭空而来,而是源于众生的贪爱与追求。 2. 与「着」、「嫉」、「守」、「护」的连锁关系: 《长阿含经》进一步推导出「因利有用,因用有欲,因欲有着,因着有嫉,因嫉有守,因守有护」的连锁反应。利养的使用会引发贪欲与执着,进而导致嫉妒、保守与守护等冲突,揭示了利养如何转化为社会与心理动荡的根源。 3. 与「修忍」的关系: 《杂阿含经》指出「一切众生类,悉皆求己利」,但在「利满足」之后,修行者应当认识到世间皆是「非常法」,此时最上乘的修行是「修忍无过上」,以忍辱来调伏对利益的执着。

五、 代表性原文引用 1. 《长阿含经》:「饮食、衣服、卧具,施于持戒人,获大果……福为根基,众生以安。」 2. 《长阿含经》:「阿难!因爱有求,因求有利,因利有用,因用有欲,因欲有着,因着有嫉,因嫉有守,因守有护。」 3. 《杂阿含经》:「恭敬修供养,现世名称流,命终生天上。」 4. 《杂阿含经》:「芭蕉生果死,竹芦实亦然,駏驉受胎死,利养弄愚夫。」 5. 《大宝积经》:「利养是众恶根本,能坏一切善法。」 6. 《大宝积经》:「若有沙门求利养故,自称得阿罗汉……是名沙门贼。」

By SutraAI-generated

長阿含經T0001 · 阿含部

《長阿含經》論及「利養」相關義理,見於兩個不同脈絡,用語與角度各有側重。

一、施與持戒人之果報脈絡。經中以「飲食、衣服、臥具」為施物之具體內容,以「施持戒人」為受施對象,明言如此布施「則獲大果」。此處利養之施被賦予極高的功德定位:經文稱布施所種之善為「真伴,終始相隨,所至到處,如影隨形」,意謂此善業如影隨形,貫穿今生後世。進一步以「種善,為後世粮」說明利養之施的功用——為來世積聚資粮;又以「福為根基,眾生以安」將福德基於眾生安穩之上;再以「福為天護,行不危嶮,生不遭難,死則上天」層層遞進,說明福報能護行者不遇危難,命終得生天上。此段用語為「施」「福」「善」,未直接使用「利養」一詞,然所論正是信眾以財物資具供養修行人之果報。

二、緣起流轉鏈中之「利」。經中佛告阿難,以逆觀方式層層追問諸法生起之因,構成一条因果鏈:「因愛有求」「因求有利」「因利用」「因用有欲」「因欲有著」「因著有嫉」「因嫉有守」「因守有護」。此處「利」即利養、得利之義,經文用語單稱「利」而非「利養」。佛以反問句式「若使一切眾生無有求者,寧有利不?」阿難答「無也」,由此確立「利由求,因求有利」的依存關係。在此鏈中,「利」居於「求」與「用」之間:因有所求故有所得(利),因有所得故起受用(用),因受用故生欲,因欲故生執著,因執著故生嫉妒,因嫉妒故有守護,因守護故有防護(護)。經文又總結云「因愛有求,至於守護,受亦如是,因受有求,至於守護」,將愛、受二支皆視為此鏈之起點,而「利」為其中必經之一環。此段將利養置於緣起流轉的負面脈絡中,視之為由愛、求而衍生、終至守護爭鬥的中間環節,與前段正面肯定布施功德的立場形成經內兩面。

三、術語形式。《長阿含經》在施報脈絡中用「施」「福」「善」等詞指稱利養之施及其果報;在緣起脈絡中則單用「利」字,以「因求有利」「因利用」之句式表達,未見「利養」合稱。此為本經用語之特徵。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「利養」,用語直取「利養」二字,不作「供養物」「資具」等婉轉替代,且常以「利養起」標記其發生態(如「提婆達多有利養起」),以「別受利養」記其偏聚之相,以「染著」點其執取之病。全經於此概念最完整之論述,見於提婆達多因緣:阿闍世王日日以五百乘車、五百釜食供養提婆達多,提婆達多更將五百人別眾受供,諸比丘聞已白佛,佛即以此為反面教材,斷言「彼提婆達多別受利養,今則自壞,他世亦壞」。此處「利養」並非中性之財物,而是一旦偏受、染著即轉為自毀之因的力量,經文連用二喻以明其烈:芭蕉、竹、蘆「生果即死,來年亦壞」,駏驉(驢騾)「受胎必死」,皆取「得即隨滅」之義,謂利養之於愚癡人,猶如果之於芭蕉、胎之於駏驉,受之愈久,「長夜不饒益苦」愈深。佛因此結歸學處:「我設有利養起,莫生染著」——不否定利養之來,而嚴戒內心之染著,此為《雜阿含經》處理利養之核心態度。

然而《雜阿含經》並非一面倒視利養為禍。另一偈頌從正面肯定如法供養之功德:「應供福田火,是火增供養,充足安隱樂」,謂以如法之財聚會,供養所應養者(福田),能令施者「生天得名稱」,是「無罪樂世間」,慧者由此往生善處。此處術語用「應供」「福田」「供養所應養」,與敘事段落之「利養」形成互補:就受者之執取言曰「利養」,就施者之如法行言曰「供養」「應供」,同一財物之流轉,經文隨立場而異其詞。

另有二偈從世間營生角度談「利」:「人當勤方便,必令利滿足,是利滿足已,何須復方便」;「若人勤方便,必令利滿足,是利滿足已,修忍無過上」。此處單用「利」字,指一般資生之利,謂勤勞方便令其滿足,滿足之後則以修忍為最上,不復更求。此與「利養」之宗教語境略有層次之別,然同屬經中論「利」之脈絡。

又有一偈涉及以力奪利之惡行:「乃至力自在,能廣虜掠彼,助怨在力增,倍收己他利」,描述恃力侵奪、兼收他人之利,屬利養之非法取得,與如法供養、不染著之正途恰成對照。

綜觀《雜阿含經》,「利養」一詞主要承載警戒義:偏受則自壞他世亦壞,染著則長夜受苦;而「供養」「應供」「福田」諸詞則承載正面義,指如法布施之功德。經文不廢利養之來,所戒在「染著」;不廢求利之勤,所尚在「滿足」後之修忍。術語形式上,本經始終用「利養」而非後世論書常見之「利養恭敬」連稱,亦不用「四事供養」等名目,敘事簡質,是其用語特色。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》論「利養」,以「利養甚重」為核心判斷,反覆申明其害:「令人不得至安隱之處」、「敗人善本,令人不到安隱之處」、「令人不得至無上正真之道」、「令人不得至無為之處」。經中更以層遞之喻極言其報:「利養之報,斷入人皮,以斷皮,便斷肉;以斷肉,便斷骨;以斷骨,便徹髓」。

對治之法為一固定句式:「未生利養心制令不生,已生求方便令滅」,各處反覆出現,或作「以生利養心,便當捨離;若未生者,勿興染心」、「設有利養心起,便當求滅」、「已生利養之心,時速滅之」。

經中以提婆達兜為利養之首要反面教材。彼「偏著利養,作五逆罪已,身壞命終,生惡趣中」;受婆羅留支王子「五百釜食日來供養」,遂「起五逆惡,身壞命終,生摩訶阿鼻地獄中」;受阿闍世王供養後「遂起貢高」。佛明言:「彼愚人由此利養自當滅亡」。另有二例:師利羅比丘本已得定、乃至天帝宮,因貪利養而「便於神通退,墮於屠殺中」;修羅陀比丘本行頭陀苦行,受蒲呼國王百味食供養後「意染此食,漸捨阿練若行」,終至「去三法衣,還為白衣,屠牛殺生」。

經中將利養列為「四結」之一,與欲結、瞋恚、愚癡並列,「覆蔽人心不得開解」。又言著利養則墮八邪道:「習邪見,離正見;習邪治,離正治;習邪語,離正語;習邪業,離正業;習邪命,離正命;習邪方便,離正方便;習邪念,離正念;習邪定,離正定」。著利養者「不獲三法:賢聖戒、賢聖三昧、賢聖智慧」。

正面教導方面,經中以師子王喻不著利養者——得供養「不起染著之心」,不得亦「無增減心」;以羊喻貪利養者——得利養便「向諸比丘而自貢高,毀蔑他人」。善知識法要求「依此利養,不自貢高,亦不毀他人」。六重法中則教「設得利養之具,當念分布,莫起貪想」。

經中又辨法施與食施之別:「常當法施,勿習食施」,貪著利養則「不行於法,不分別法,毀世尊教」。此處以「食施」「思欲之施」稱財物布施,與他經逕稱「財施」者用詞有別。

此外,經中記波旬以利養為擾亂方便,教人民強施比丘衣被飯食,使「貪著利養,不能暫捨」;又記外道因「我等不得利養,今此沙門多得利養」而起害佛之謀。比丘十法中,「貪著利養,心不放捨」為第五不得久住之法。

Related