Dharma · AI Companion

心一境性

cittaikāgratā

心持续专注於单一所缘的状态。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

Here is a deep textual interpretation and practical analysis of One-Pointedness of Mind (*cittaikāgratā* / 心一境性).


What Is "One-Pointedness of Mind"?

In popular understanding, One-Pointedness of Mind (*cittaikāgratā* / 心一境性) is often simplified to concentration (*samādhi* / 三昧)—a state where a meditator forces their mental focus onto a single object, such as the breath or a visualized image, suppressing all stray thoughts. While this describes the initial stages of meditative focus, the Mahāyāna canonical framework—specifically exemplified in the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*Dābǎojī Jīng* / 《大寶積經》, translated by Bodhiruci in the Tang Dynasty)—elevates "One-Pointedness of Mind" to an ultimate, non-foundational realization rooted in Prajñā wisdom (*prajñāpāramitā* / 般若波羅蜜多).

1. One-Sentence Definition

"One-Pointedness of Mind" is a state of meditative realization (*samādhi*) characterized by non-attainment (*anupalambha* / 無所得), where the unarising nature of mind (*cittasvabhāva-anutpāda* / 心性不生) is realized, the mind across the three times (past, present, and future) as well as all phenomena (*dharmas*) are understood to be ungraspable, and all erroneous attachments and conceptual discriminations are completely transcended.


2. The Core Tenets and Structural Dimensions

##### A. Non-Existence of the Organs/Objects and the Unarising Nature of the Mind *(根塵無實與心性不生)* In classical meditative investigation, the practitioner thoroughly examines all phenomena (*dharmas* / 諸法). Upon exhaustive search, not a single dharma can be found possessing intrinsic, independent existence (*svabhāva* / 自性).

* **Six Sense Organs & Objects (*ṣaḍindriya-viṣaya* / 六根六塵):** The eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind—along with their corresponding external objects (form, sound, smell, taste, touch, ideas)—are ungraspable as fixed, solid entities. * **Unarising Mind (*cittasvabhāva-anutpāda* / 心性不生):** Because both the inner sense faculties and external environments lack intrinsic reality, the apprehending mind itself does not truly arise or abide. The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* explicitly declares: *"Therefore, that mind cannot be obtained"* (是故彼心不可得也). The direct awareness of the mind's ultimate ungraspability forms the true foundation of One-Pointedness.

##### B. Ungraspability of the Mind Across the Three Times *(三世心無所得)* When viewed through time, the mind across past, present, and future lacks inherent existence or agency: * Past mind has already ceased and cannot be grasped. * Future mind has not yet arrived and cannot be caught. * Present mind changes instantaneously and cannot abide.

In this moment, where the mind across the three times is neither bound (*bandhana* / 繫縛) nor liberated (*mokṣa* / 解脫), following along with all mental states while realizing their ultimate ungraspability is true One-Pointedness of Mind. This state is also referred to as "Entering the Count of Mind" (*rù xīn zhī shù* / 入心之數), signifying that the mind's non-attainment naturally accords with the fundamental nature of mental dharmas.

##### C. Transcending Wrong Attachments and Conceptual Discrimination *(遠離邪執分別)* The text strictly warns against subtle attachments that masquerade as spiritual effort. If a practitioner stays in a remote forest (*āraṇya* / 阿蘭若) or a quiet room, contemplates the impermanence of the six sense faculties and objects, and generates the active intention *"I am heading toward Nirvāṇa"* (我趣涅槃), this remains an intentional, arising-and-ceasing mental effort—a toil that falls short of genuine ascetic practice (*śramaṇa-caryā* / 沙門行).

Trying to forcefully eradicate or suppress the sense organs breeds subtle dualistic discrimination between samsara and Nirvāṇa. The Sūtra explicitly challenges: > *"If one gives rise to conceptual discriminations among views, how can one achieve One-Pointedness of Mind?"* > (若於諸見起分別者,雲何能得心一境性?)

Thus, true One-Pointedness requires relinquishing even the subtle attachment to concepts like "impermanence," "extinction," or "attaining Nirvāṇa".


3. Related Terms & Textual Nuances in the Canonical Corpus

* **Good Samādhi (*su-samādhi* / 善三昧):** While different practitioners have varied good inclinations (*kuśala-citta* / 善意樂), "Good Samādhi" allows these diverse mental actions to converge into "a single practice" (同於一行). Through the "single aspect of renunciation/liberation" (一出離相), one realizes that all phenomena are intrinsically tranquil. This aligns directly with One-Pointedness in transcending dualistic views. * **Joy of Samādhi & Tranquil Meditative State (*samādhi-sukha* / 三昧樂與禪定寂定):** True One-Pointedness is not a cold, unresponsive state akin to withered wood or dead ashes. Practitioners skillfully experience the "Joy of Samādhi" (巧學三昧樂), remaining anchored in wholesome qualities across all postures—walking, standing, sitting, and lying down—experiencing abiding joy without affliction (*kleśa* / 苦惱). * Terminology Distinction ("Aggregates" / 蘊 vs. 五陰): In describing how foolish worldly beings attach to dreams and reality, the canonical text deliberately employs the term *yùn* (蘊 - skandha/aggregate) rather than the older translation *wǔ yīn* (五陰), reflecting the standardized and refined terminology of later translation eras (such as Bodhiruci's work).


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life

To understand how One-Pointedness of Mind applies today, consider a familiar modern scenario: Working late on a high-stakes project while managing algorithmic distractions and notification alerts.

``` [External Stimuli: Notifications, Emails, Deadlines] ↓ [Illusion of Concentration: Forcing focus through sheer willpower] ↓ [Canonical Check: Is this One-Pointedness?] ├── Examining the Eye/Mind: Sensations & screens are ungraspable (根塵無實) ├── Examining Time: Past worry & future anxiety are ungraspable (三世心無所得) └── Abandoning Dualism: Dropping "I must eliminate all thoughts" (遠離邪執) ↓ [Genuine One-Pointedness: Open awareness, non-clinging, effortless action] ```

Step 1: Misinterpreting One-Pointedness as Brute-Force Hyperfocus

You are sitting in front of your laptop at 10:00 PM. A critical email arrives, your phone buzzes with group chats, and your mind is flooded with worry about tomorrow's presentation.

* The Common Misstep: You try to force focus by clenching your teeth, telling yourself: *"I must block out all noise, put away my phone, suppress my anxiety, and get into 'the zone'."* * The canonical critique: This forced suppression is what the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* warns against as "seeking Nirvāṇa through conceptual effort". You have created a conflict between "bad distractions" (noise, notifications) and "good focus" (getting work done). You are actively discriminating between states, generating subtle aversion and mental strain.

Step 2: Examining the Organs and Objects (*根塵無實*)

Instead of suppressing thoughts, you conduct a moment of meditative inquiry:

1. **The External Screen/Sound (*塵*): The glowing pixels of the monitor, the chime of a Slack message—what are they intrinsically? They are momentary light patterns and pressure waves, arising and disappearing. They have no solid, fixed identity that can inherently trap your mind. 2. The Internal Faculties & Mind (*根與心*):** What is the "I" that feels stressed? The eyes looking at the screen, the mental organ processing stress—where is the permanent entity called "my focused mind"? When searched for, it cannot be pinned down as an unchangeable substance (*心性不生*).

Step 3: Observing the Three Times (*三世心無所得*)

You look at time: * The anxiety over the mistake you made at 2:00 PM today? That past mind has already ceased; it is completely ungraspable. * The fear of your manager's reaction tomorrow morning? That future mind has not arrived; it exists only as a mental phantom. * The present feeling of pressure? As soon as you try to hold it, it has already morphed into the next instant.

Step 4: Arriving at True One-Pointedness

Realizing that the past, present, and future minds are ungraspable—neither bound by external demands nor needing to escape them—the rigid boundary between "me trying to concentrate" and "the distracting world" dissolves.

You continue typing your report, answering necessary messages, and addressing tasks. You do not need to forcibly annihilate thoughts to find peace; rather, because you no longer cling to thoughts or oppose them, your mind naturally rests in a unified, effortless state (*隨所有心無所得*). This is the practical embodiment of One-Pointedness in daily work.


Why Contemporary People Need It

1. The Trap of the "Attention Economy" and Hyper-Control

Contemporary life is dominated by algorithms designed to fracture human focus. In response, modern productivity culture glorifies extreme focus, deep work, or technological tools to seal oneself off from distraction.

However, approaching concentration purely through hyper-control often leads to burnout and exhaustion. When people treat their own mind as an enemy to be subdued, every stray thought creates guilt and internal division. The wisdom of "One-Pointedness of Mind" offers a paradigm shift: true calm comes not from suppressing mental movement, but from recognizing the empty, ungraspable nature of thoughts so that they no longer disrupt your peace.

2. Contrast with Contemporary Analogies (Flow & AI)

* Comparison with "Flow State": Positive psychology speaks of "Flow"—a state of deep immersion where time seems to vanish. While Flow shares the surface quality of absorption, it often depends heavily on specific conditions (such as a clear task, immediate feedback, and optimal skill challenge) and can lead to subtle attachment to the enjoyable activity. One-Pointedness of Mind, by contrast, is anchored in Prajñā wisdom (*無所得*); it does not depend on ideal external conditions and transcends attachment to the experience itself. * Comparison with AI & Algorithmic Processing: An AI model processes single-threaded computational tasks with perfect focus, free from emotional distraction. However, AI computation is purely functional data processing. One-Pointedness is an active, luminous awareness accompanied by the "Joy of Samādhi" (*三昧樂*) and freedom from internal affliction (*無有苦惱*).

*(Note: While cognitive science and modern psychology study states of focus and flow, empirical research focuses primarily on physiological markers and functional performance; it does not measure or validate ultimate metaphysical concepts such as "unborn mind" or "non-attainment.")*


Common Misinterpretations & Clarifications

| Common Misinterpretation | Canonical Reality (*Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra*) | | :--- | :--- | | 1. "One-Pointedness means fixing the mind on a single spot and stopping all thoughts." | True One-Pointedness is not mechanical mental immobilization. It is realizing that all thoughts and objects are ungraspable (*一法亦不可得*), allowing the mind to remain untethered even amidst activity. | | 2. "To achieve Samādhi, I must reject samsara and forcibly seek Nirvāṇa." | The Sūtra explicitly warns that generating a dualistic作意 (intention) like *"I am eliminating senses to reach Nirvāṇa"* is a subtle mental trap and self-imposed toil (*自尋劬勞*), not genuine practice. | | 3. "One-Pointedness is a blank, emotionless state like dead wood or cold stone." | One-Pointedness is accompanied by "Good Samādhi" and the "Joy of Samādhi" (*巧學三昧樂*), enabling a practitioner to maintain joyful, unafflicted awareness throughout daily activities. | | 4. "One-Pointedness is achieved by eliminating the six sense faculties." | Eagerness to destroy or mute the sense faculties stems from discrimination (*分別*). The Sūtra notes: *"If one gives rise to conceptual discriminations among views, how can one achieve One-Pointedness of Mind?"* Liberation lies in seeing their lack of inherent nature, not physical suppression. |


Summary Table: Classical Metaphors of the Five Aggregates (*Skandhas*)

To maintain textual accuracy when examining the mind and reality during meditation, the classical metaphors corresponding to the five aggregates are retained below:

| Aggregate (*Skandha* / 蘊) | Canonical Metaphor | Structural Meaning in Meditative Examination | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Form Aggregate (*Rūpa* / 色蘊) | Like a cluster of foam (*如聚沫*) | Physical matter and sense objects are unstable, porous, and lack solid substance. | | Sensation Aggregate (*Vedanā* / 受蘊) | Like a water bubble (*如水泡*) | Feelings of pleasure, pain, or neutrality surge and burst instantly upon contact. | | Perception Aggregate (*Saṃjñā* / 想蘊) | Like a mirage / wild horse (*如野馬/陽焰*) | Conceptual labels and cognitive recognitions distort reality like a distant shimmer. | | Formation Aggregate (*Saṃskāra* / 行蘊) | Like a plantain tree (*如芭蕉*) | Volitional impulses and mental formations have no core when peeled layer by layer. | | Consciousness Aggregate (*Vijñāna* / 識蘊) | Like a phantom / illusion (*如幻*) | Discriminative awareness constructs illusory experiences without an underlying owner. |

By examining the five aggregates through these canonical perspectives, one sees that neither the external environment nor the internal mind possesses an unshakeable identity. In that complete non-attainment (*無所得*), true One-Pointedness of Mind naturally shines forth.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在大乘佛教经典《大宝积经》(《大寶積經》,唐菩提流志译)中,“心一境性”(cittaikāgratā)并非指心念单纯专注于单一外在或内在所缘的渐修定境,而是从“无所得”与“法无自性”的究竟空义出发的般若学诠释。其核心要义在于,修行者在周遍推求一切法后,了知“乃至一法亦不可得”。因为眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意等六根皆无真实之自性,心性本身亦是不生不灭的。既然一切诸法与能观之心皆不可得,那么在过去、现在、未来三世心皆不系缚、不解脱的当下,随顺所有心无所得,即是真正的“心一境性”,此亦被称为“入心之数”。

二、主要阐述

《大宝积经》从否定性与超越性的角度,对“心一境性”进行了深细的阐述,主要体现在以下几个方面: 1. 根尘无实与心性不生:修行者在修持禅定时,应当周遍推求。通过推求可以发现,眼等六根以及与之相对的诸法,皆得不到真实的自性。由于外境与内根皆无实,能认识它们的心性本身也是不生的。经中明确指出“是故彼心不可得也”,这种对心不可得的现量觉知,是契入心一境性的基础。 2. 三世心无所得:从时间维度来看,过去心、现在心、未来心皆无所得,亦无所作。修行者若能了知三世心既不被系缚,亦不求解脱,在随顺所有心皆无所得的当下,即是“心一境性”的真实显现。 3. 远离邪执分别:经文严厉警示了修行中容易出现的法执。若修行者在阿兰若或空室中,虽然思惟眼耳鼻舌身意及色声香味触法是无常,并生起“我趣涅槃”的作意,这实际上只是自寻劬劳的生灭作意,并非真正的沙门行。如果为了灭除眼等诸根而勤苦修习,就会在根、尘、识等处生起执着与分别。经中明确质问:“若于诸见起分别者,云何能得心一境性?” 因此,真正的禅定必须超越对无常、生灭、涅槃的邪执与分别。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《大宝积经》中,关于禅定、心识及物质现象的表述,展现了特定的译词特征与部类色彩: 1. “蕴”与“五阴/阴”的译词差异:在论及世俗愚夫对梦境与现实的执着时,本经使用的是“蕴”这一译语(如“于诸蕴中起于物想”、“如来说蕴犹如于梦”),这与大乘其他译本或早期译本中常见的使用“五阴”或“阴”的表述存在明显的译词差异,体现了唐代新译在术语上的规范性。 2. “心一境性”与“善三昧”的并列:经中除了使用“心一境性”外,还使用了“善三昧”这一独特术语。这表明在不同的语境下,对于心念专注与寂静的描述有不同的侧重点。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与“善三昧”的关系:“善三昧”是指诸善意乐者的心行虽然各有差别,但皆能“同于一行”。这种三昧是以“一出离相”来了知一切法皆悉寂静,与“心一境性”在超越分别、契入寂静的层面上是相通的。 2. 与“三昧乐”及“禅定寂定”的关系:经中以“禅定寂定”为修行者的境界,修行者能巧学“三昧乐”,在行住坐卧中依止诸善,心常喜乐而无苦恼。这说明“心一境性”并非枯木死灰般的无知状态,而是伴随着“三昧乐”与“禅定寂定”的活泼妙用。 3. 与“入心之数”的关系:随顺所有心无所得的状态,不仅是“心一境性”,也被称为“入心之数”,这表明无所得的心行已经融入了心法运作的根本规律之中。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 关于根尘无实与心不可得:“彼若如是周遍推求,乃至一法亦不可得。眼不可得,耳鼻舌身意亦不可得,乃至一切法中得真实性。以是义故,心性不生。是故彼心不可得也。” 2. 关于反对邪执分别:“若于诸见起分别者,云何能得心一境性?” 3. 关于三世心无所得与心一境性:“过去、未来、现在无所得、无所作,不缚不解。随所有心无所得者,是为心一境性,亦名入心之数。” 4. 关于善三昧:“善三昧者,谓诸善意乐,虽行差别,同于一行。以一出离相,知一切法皆悉寂静。” 5. 关于三昧乐与禅定寂定:“禅定寂定,巧学三昧乐,行住坐卧,依止诸善,心常喜乐,无有苦恼。”

By SutraAI-generated

菩提道次第略論B0065 · 藏傳論典部

一、核心義涵:《菩提道次第略論》以「三摩地」說明心一境性,謂心於所緣「專一而住」,並能於同一所緣相續安住。其所修正定具二種殊勝:一是心境極為明顯的「明顯分」,二是專住所緣、無分別安住的「住分」。明相由斷除惛沉而顯,專一無分別則由斷除掉舉而成;故惛沉與掉舉被視為定障之首。

二、成辦方法:心一境性須依正念與正知守護。正念使心不忘既定所緣、不向餘境散亂,是安住所緣的根本;正知則如實察覺心已散、未散、將散或不散。論中以調伏狂象為喻:以「正念索」將心繫於所緣堅柱,若心不住,便以「正知鐵鈎」漸次調順。修念的要點不是反覆重新觀察,而是在心已住所緣後,相續護持其勢力。

三、所緣與穩固性的關係:修定初期不以影像極端清晰為唯一標準;若能在佛像半分粗大支分上攝心,即使尚無光明,也應知足而安住。若一味追求明顯、數數攀緣,雖可略得顯了,反而不易獲得堅固三摩地,甚至成為定障。所緣的顯色、形色、數量或形體若變動,心不應隨之轉,仍須安住原先決定的根本所緣。

四、未得輕安時的層次:在身心輕安尚未生起以前,雖已具有心一境性,仍屬欲地,不能立為等引地;即使無分別心能自行運轉,並可融會行住坐臥一切威儀,論中仍稱之為「欲心專一境性」,而非真正的奢摩他。此處顯示專一安住雖是奢摩他的必要內容,卻不能單憑專一便判定已成辦奢摩他。

五、與輕安及真奢摩他的關係:身心於善所緣轉動無礙、粗重止息,稱為輕安。心一境性自初得三摩地時已有微細少分,隨修習漸次增廣,最後成為「輕安心一境性之三摩地」。當強盛輕安與喜悅逐漸平穩,心遠離躍動而於所緣堅固寂靜安住,方獲得正奢摩他。

六、增長與作用:得奢摩他後,心一境性住定能迅速引發身心輕安;輕安增長,又使「心一境性妙奢摩他」隨之增長,二者輾轉相增。由此所得有作意之定心,具有修習粗靜相道或諦相道、淨治煩惱的能力。

七、術語記錄:本論並用「心一境性」「欲心專一境性」「輕安心一境性」「奢摩他心一境性」等形式;又以「專一而住」「專一安住」「專住所緣」「無分別住分」描述其作用。其區分重點在於:欲界等持雖可有心一境性,唯有與圓滿輕安相應、攝入初禪近分,才稱真奢摩他;未得初近分所攝三摩地以前,一切等持皆稱「欲界心一境性」。

菩提道次第廣論B0067 · 藏傳論典部

《菩提道次第廣論》對「心一境性」一詞有多層面的論述,可歸納如下:

一、自性與定義

論中明示心一境性即奢摩他之自性、總相。引《修次初編》:「奢摩他自性者,唯是心一境性,故此即是一切奢摩他總相」;又引《寶雲經》:「奢摩他是心一境性」。在靜慮波羅蜜多自性段落中則表述為「住所緣境心不散亂,善心一境性」。《聲聞地》對心一境性有較細的界定:「謂數數隨念同分所緣,流注、無罪、適悅相應,令心相續,名三摩地,亦名為善心一境性」。由此可知,心一境性、三摩地、善心一境性在本論中互為同義異名,皆指心持續專注於單一所緣之相續流注狀態。

二、與奢摩他、毘缽舍那的體系定位

論以「善緣心一境性諸三摩地悉皆攝為奢摩他品」,將所有令心專注於善所緣之三摩地歸入奢摩他品;以揀擇如所有性、盡所有性之妙觀察慧歸入毘缽舍那品。「無散亂心」即奢摩他品之心一境性,「正思法義」即毘缽舍那品之妙觀察慧。

三、修習教授

修心一境性之共通教授為「以念、正知,遠離沉、掉」。具體行相包括九心次第,其中第八「專注一境者,為令任運轉故,而正策勵」,即已趨近無功用轉。「數數隨念」即正念之力,為心一境性不可或缺之因。

四、與輕安的關係——欲界定與定地之分

論中特別區分兩種心一境性:未得輕安前,「欲界心一境性」屬欲界攝,非真奢摩他,不能立為等引地。得身心輕安後,輕安與心一境性「輾轉相依,輾轉相屬」,互相增長,方名「輕安心一境性妙奢摩他」。此輕安之力由風大遍滿身心而來,能令身心於善事轉極有堪能。

五、由觀亦能引生心一境性

論指出,不僅止修能成心一境性,「若由自力能引輕安,則亦能引心一境性,故由觀慧思擇自力而能引生心一境性,是由已成正奢摩他所有功德」。可見心一境性雖屬奢摩他品,亦可由已得奢摩他之觀察慧助伴而生。

六、本論獨特用詞與術語

本論以「心一境性」為主體用詞,並交替使用「三摩地」、「等持」、「奢摩他」等異名,且特別以「善心一境性」、「輕安心一境性」、「欲界心一境性」等複合詞區分其位階與品質,未見以其他異名(如「一境性」單獨使用)替代此概念之處。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》(唐菩提流志譯,寶積部)對「心一境性」的論述,並非從止觀修習的技術層面入手,而是以般若空性徹底重新定義此概念:心一境性不是將心專注於某一所緣,而是「周遍推求乃至一法亦不可得」。經中佛告迦葉:「心一境性者,為以幾何名心一境性?周遍推求乃至一法亦不可得。所謂於眼不可得實,於耳鼻舌身意亦不得實,於一切法皆不得實。何以故?本性如是,心性不生,一切諸法無實可得,是故彼心不可得也。」 此處以六根(眼耳鼻舌身意)與一切法為推求對象,結論是無一法有實可得,而「心性不生」正是不可得的根據——心本身亦無實體可執,故能緣之心與所緣之境俱不可得,這便是心一境性。

經文先鋪陳反面:若比丘於阿蘭若處思惟「眼是無常」乃至「我趣涅槃」,佛判此為「自劬勞,非沙門行」,原因是「以有若干諸邪執故」。接著指出:「若於三處了知信受,則於三處而生分別。若於諸見起分別者,云何能得心一境性?」 亦即,凡於根、境、識等處起了知信受,便落分別;有分別即與心一境性相違。此經將「分別」視為心一境性的直接障礙,而分別的根源是「執著」——乃至「於空性中起一切想」亦屬執著,「皆悉非作沙門婆羅門法」。

第二段原文進一步從三世時間維度界定心一境性:「若過去未來現在無所得故、無所作故,是謂無所作。何名無所作?若新若故俱不可作,名無所作。是中過去心不解脫、現在心不解脫、未來心不解脫,隨所有心無所得者,是為心一境性。此即名入心之數也。」 此處以「無所作」為中介概念:三世之心皆不解脫、皆無所得,不造作新亦不造作故,如此方名心一境性。值得注意的是「過去心不解脫、現在心不解脫、未來心不解脫」一句——並非說心被繫縛,而是說三世心本無實體可得,無可解脫亦無可繫縛,「隨所有心無所得」即是心一境性。末句「此即名入心之數也」,將此無所得之心一境性歸入「心之數」(心所法)的範疇加以安立。

術語方面,此經逕用「心一境性」四字,未見異譯形式;以「六根」(眼耳鼻舌身意)而非「六入」「六處」為推求框架;以「無所作」「無所得」為心一境性的核心限定語;以「心性不生」為其本體論根據。經文又用「邪執」「分別」「想執著」等詞標示心一境性的反面,並以虛空為喻(「虛空之法終不念言我是虛空」)說明真正的沙門法「不作不除」,與心一境性之無所得義互相呼應。整體而言,《大寶積經》此段將心一境性從「專注一境」的禪定義翻轉為「遍求不得一法」的般若義,是此經論述該概念最獨特的側面。

Related