Dharma · AI Companion

中般涅槃

antarābhava-parinirvāṇa

不还者于中有位证入涅槃AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is Saying

In the architecture of Buddhist liberation, Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa (中般涅槃, *Parinirvāṇa in the Intermediate State*) represents a unique and crucial milestone along the path of the Non-returner (*Anāgāmin*, 阿那含). To understand where it stands, one must look at the blueprint of the path to liberation (*mārga*, 解脱道).

When a practitioner cultivates the path, their ultimate goal is the total eradication of defilements (*kleśa*, 烦恼) and the attainment of *Parinirvāṇa* (般涅槃, complete liberation). However, not all practitioners complete this final breakthrough during their active lifetime. In canonical texts such as the *Saṃyukta Āgama* (《杂阿含经》) and the *Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra* (《大般涅槃经》), the status of an *Anāgāmin*—one who has severed the five lower fetters (*pañca-ovarambhāgiya-saṃyojana*, 五下分结: self-identity view, attachment to rules/rituals, doubt, sensual desire, and ill-will)—is categorized into a precise hierarchy based on when and how they enter final liberation:

1. Parinirvāṇa in the Present Life (*xiànfǎ zhìzhèng lè* 现法智证乐 / *xiànfǎ zhì yǒu yú nièpán* 现法智有余涅槃): Complete liberation attained while currently alive in this world. 2. Parinirvāṇa in the Intermediate State (*zhōng bān nièpán* 中般涅槃): Liberation attained after relinquishing the body of the Desire Realm (*kāmadhātu*, 欲界), but before taking birth in the Form Realm (*rūpadhātu*, 色界). 3. Parinirvāṇa upon Rebirth (*shēng bān nièpán* 生般涅槃): Liberation attained immediately upon taking birth in the Form Realm. 4. Parinirvāṇa with Exertion / Without Exertion (*yǒuxíng / wúxíng bān nièpán* 有行/无行般涅槃): Liberation in the Form Realm through strenuous effort or spontaneous realization. 5. Parinirvāṇa by Upward Flow (*shàngliú bān nièpán* 上流般涅槃): Traversing upward through the higher heavens of the Form Realm before reaching ultimate extinction.

1. Core Definition and Mechanisms

By definition, *Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa* refers to the attainment of final *Nirvāṇa* by a sharp-rooted practitioner (*tīkṣṇendriya*, 利根) at the critical juncture between dropping their physical body in the Desire Realm and arriving at the Form Realm.

Why did such a sharp-rooted practitioner fail to achieve *Nirvāṇa* during their actual lifetime? The *Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra* provides two deep structural reasons: * Physical Frailty (*sìdà léiruò*, 四大羸劣): The physical body was severely weakened or afflicted by illness, impairing the mental stamina required for the final breakthrough. * Lack of External Requisites: The practitioner lacked basic conducive external conditions—such as proper shelter, food, clothing, bedding, or medicine—causing mental disturbance and preventing full realization before death.

Despite missing the opportunity in life, their internal spiritual momentum remains intact. Canonical texts highlight two driving forces behind this late-stage liberation: 1. Cultivation of the Seven Factors of Awakening (*saptaboḍhyaṅga*, 七觉分): Continuous practice of mindfulness, investigation of phenomena, energy, joy, tranquility, concentration, and equanimity. 2. Affection, Mindfulness, and Joy toward the Dharma (*yùfǎ, niànfǎ, lèfǎ*, 欲法、念法、乐法): A deep aspiration for, mindfulness of, and delight in the Buddha's teaching. At the moment of death, this spiritual momentum allows them to sever the remaining subtle fetters in the intermediate state.

2. The Three Sub-categories

The *Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra* subdivides *Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa* into three distinct temporal tiers depending on how swiftly the breakthrough occurs: * Superior Grade (*shàngpǐn*, 上品): Relinquishing the body of the Desire Realm and attaining *Nirvāṇa* before even leaving the sphere of the Desire Realm. * Medium Grade (*zhōngpǐn*, 中品): Attaining *Nirvāṇa* just after leaving the Desire Realm, but before arriving at the Form Realm. * Lower Grade (*xiàpǐn*, 下品): Attaining *Nirvāṇa* after leaving the Desire Realm and reaching the very edge of the Form Realm.

Furthermore, the scripture explains this term through the four psychological states of an *Anāgāmin*: (1) neither seeker nor non-seeker (*fēi xué fēi wú xué*, 非学非无学), (2) seeker (*xué*, 学), (3) non-seeker (*wú xué*, 无学), and (4) entering *Nirvāṇa* in neither seeker nor non-seeker state. Because two of these four states pertain to *Nirvāṇa* and two do not, it is called "Intermediate" (*zhōng*, 中).

3. Why It Occurs in the Desire Realm but Not the Form Realm

The *Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra* addresses a crucial question posed by Bodhisattva Kāśyapa: Why does *Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa* occur when transitioning out of the Desire Realm, but not out of the Form Realm? The Buddha gives three reasons: 1. Dual Conditions (Internal & External): The Desire Realm possesses both internal psychological obstacles and external environmental triggers. The Form Realm lacks external disturbing conditions. 2. Vigor in Revulsion: Practitioners in the Desire Realm can intensely revile both sensual desire (*yù'ài*, 欲爱) and form desire (*sè'ài*, 色爱), while directly confronting and condemning coarse afflictions such as stinginess, greed, anger, jealousy, shamelesness, and lack of remorse. 3. Vigor of the Path (*yǒngjiàn*, 勇健): The spiritual path cultivated in the Desire Realm is exceptionally robust because all four fruits of recluseship (*śrāmaṇyapala*, 四沙门果) can be realized here.

4. The Canonical Analogy

To describe the abiding state of the *Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa* practitioner, the *Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra* uses the vivid analogy: **"Like a *cuò* fish (*cuòyú dé shí yǐ zhù*, 䱜鱼得食已住) resting after finding food."** Just as a giant ocean fish settles down peacefully the moment it secures sustenance, these practitioners—having severed endless afflictions, cast off the five realms of worldly rebirth (hell, hungry ghosts, animals, humans, devas), and detached from worldliness—rest permanently in ultimate peace without taking further birth in the coarse Desire Realm.


Walkthrough in Daily Life

While *Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa* specifically describes a post-mortem spiritual event of an advanced sage, its underlying psychological mechanics can be mapped onto contemporary cognitive and behavioral experiences.

Scenario: Navigating a Career Crisis and Sudden Layoff

Imagine a senior tech employee, Alex, who has spent years practicing mindfulness and emotional regulation. Alex has built strong mental resilience (equivalent to cultivating the Seven Factors of Awakening), yet works under immense pressure in a toxic corporate environment without proper sleep or support (reflecting physical frailty and lack of external requisites).

``` [Phase 1: Life in the Desire Realm] Alex's High-Pressure Job / Toxic Workplace └─ Coarse Afflictions: Greed for promotions, Fear of failure, Envy of peers. └─ Cultivation: Alex practices mindfulness, detaching from subtle ego-triggers.

▼ (Crisis Occurs: Sudden Layoff / Corporate Restructuring)

[Phase 2: Relinquishing the Old Identity / The Intermediate Gap] "The Intermediate State" (No longer employed, not yet re-anchored elsewhere) ├─ Superior Grade Mapping: │ Recognizes instantly: "The title was an illusion." Complete liberation from identity-fear before even leaving the exit interview room. ├─ Medium Grade Mapping: │ Walks out of the building, sitting in the car between office and home. In that quiet threshold, the realization hits and attachment fully dissolves. └─ Lower Grade Mapping: │ Reaches the front door of home, on the verge of opening LinkedIn to start a new job hunt, and right there drops the compulsion entirely.

[Phase 3: The Result] "Like a Cuò Fish Resting After Food" └─ Alex stops compulsively seeking external validation; deep, unshakeable tranquility ensues. ```

Mapping Contemporary Experience to Canonical Definitions

1. The Coarse Environment (The Desire Realm): Alex's day-to-day office environment is filled with sensory overload, corporate metrics, and office politics. This aligns with the classical description of the Desire Realm, where afflictions are coarse (greed, anger, jealousy) and both internal and external triggers abound. 2. Internal Readiness vs. External Obstacles: Alex understands non-attachment conceptually and practices daily meditation, but chronic fatigue and back-to-back meetings (physical frailty and lack of requisites) prevent a complete breakthrough during normal working hours. 3. The Unravelling Moment (Death / Transition): The sudden termination notification acts as the "relinquishing of the body." The old professional persona collapses. 4. The Three Grades of Transition: * *Superior Grade*: Before even packing up the laptop desk (leaving the body without leaving the realm), Alex sees through the whole game of status. The fetters of fear and craving instantly snap. * *Medium Grade*: The transition occurs midway—while walking through the lobby or driving home (departed the old realm, not yet settled in a new one). The momentum of years of mindfulness suddenly crystallizes. * *Lower Grade*: The transition happens right at the threshold of starting a new job search (at the edge of the next realm). 5. The Fish Resting Analogy: Once Alex realizes true freedom from the compulsion to climb the corporate ladder, Alex settles into deep inner stillness—no longer swimming compulsively after the bait of external approval.

Common Mapping Mistakes to Avoid

* Mistake 1: Reducing the "Intermediate State" (*antarābhava*) to mere idle daydreaming or vacation time. In Buddhism, the intermediate state is a specific ontological transition driven by subtle karmic inertia; mapping it loosely to "taking a sabbatical" misses the life-and-death gravity of karma and mental momentum. * Mistake 2: Equating *Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa* with simple "stress relief." Liberation in Buddhism requires the complete severance of fundamental ignorance (*avidyā*, 无明) and the lower fetters, not just a temporary drop in cortisol levels.


Why Modern People Need It

Modern culture is obsessed with immediate, visible success—what canonical texts refer to as "Parinirvāṇa in the Present Life" (*xiànfǎ bān nièpán*, 见法般涅槃). We expect instant results: immediate meditation breakthroughs, quick emotional fixes, and visible productivity gains.

Understanding *Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa* offers modern seekers three profound insights:

1. Relieving the Anxiety of "Incomplete" Achievement: Many modern practitioners feel deep self-doubt when they do not achieve complete mental peace or awakening despite years of meditation practice. Canonical wisdom reassures us that physical illness, toxic environments, or lack of supportive conditions (four elements frail, lack of requisites) can hinder full realization in this life. Yet, every unit of genuine spiritual effort (desire, mindfulness, and joy for the Dharma) is preserved as momentum that operates at critical transitional moments.

2. The Power of Transitional Thresholds: In modern cognitive science and psychology, "threshold concepts" and "liminal spaces" represent periods where old cognitive structures collapse before new ones form. In neuroscience, neuroplasticity often spikes during state transitions or post-disruption periods. While science studies synaptic rewiring and habit disruption (and cannot verify post-mortem realms), the parallel reveals a key truth: the moment an old structure dissolves is the most fertile ground for deep transformation.

3. Valuing the "Latent Momentum" of Mind: Algorithms in modern society train us to focus only on immediate output. *Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa* reminds us that spiritual practice builds profound latent momentum (*saṃskāra*, 行蕴). Even if the external body collapses or life circumstances fail to support a final breakthrough now, the deeply ingrained habit of wisdom (*prajñā*, 智慧) carries forward through the critical gaps of existence.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading 1: "Isn't the intermediate state (Bardo) a later invention not recognized in early Buddhism?"

Clarification: Some modern commentators assume that the intermediate state (*antarābhava*, 中阴/中yǒu) was invented centuries later by Tibetan traditions. However, early canonical texts like the *Saṃyukta Āgama* explicitly record the term "Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa" (中般涅槃) as one of the five types of Non-returners (*Anāgāmin*). Different early Buddhist schools (*Nikāyas*) held varying scholastic views on the duration and form of the intermediate state, but the position of *Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa* within the progressive stages of liberation is firmly rooted in the core Āgamas and Sūtras.

Misreading 2: "If someone enters Nirvāṇa in the intermediate state, does that mean they still have a physical body?"

Clarification: No. *Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa* explicitly requires having relinquished the body of the Desire Realm (*shě yùjiè shēn*, 舍欲界身). The practitioner has shed their physical, physical-element body. Their realization occurs in the mental/subtle continuum before taking on a form in the Form Realm.

Misreading 3: "Is this concept equivalent to modern Near-Death Experiences (NDEs) or altered states of consciousness?"

Clarification: No. While NDEs involve brain chemistry, sensory deprivation, or psychological visions during resuscitation, *Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa* is a specific level of spiritual realization achieved exclusively by advanced noble beings (*āryapudgala*, 圣者) who have severed the five lower fetters. Conflating NDEs with Buddhist liberation confuses temporary psychological phenomena with the permanent destruction of afflictions (*kṣayajñāna*, 尽智).

Misreading 4: "Can anyone rely on this as a procrastination tactic for spiritual practice?"

Clarification: Absolutely not. *Antarābhava-parinirvāṇa* is available only to those who have already attained the high stage of a Non-returner (*Anāgāmin*) and continuously cultivated the Seven Factors of Awakening. Far from being a passive shortcut, it represents the final, explosive fruition of intensive life-long spiritual discipline coming to fruition at the ultimate threshold.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

「中般涅槃」(antarābhava-parinirvāṇa)是指修行者在命终舍弃欲界身之后、尚未到达色界的中途,凭借利根等因缘在其中间证入涅槃的解脱果位。

在《杂阿含经》中,它是修行者在命终时,因断尽五下分结而证得的一种涅槃果位。在《大般涅槃经》中,此概念亦被称为「中涅槃」,特指阿那含(不还果)圣者在欲界与色界之间,以利根力断除烦恼而般涅槃的状态。

二、 主要阐述

根据相关经典,中般涅槃的修持因缘、分类及产生机制主要包括以下几个维度:

1. 修持因缘与动力 * 七觉分与断结:在《杂阿含经》中,修习并多修习「七觉分」是证得中般涅槃的核心因缘。若修行者未能于当下生命中获得「现法智证乐」或「现法智有余涅槃」,但在命终时能够断尽五下分结,便能证得中般涅槃。 * 欲法、念法、乐法:此外,「欲法、念法、乐法」(即对佛法的向往、正念与喜乐)是未得完全解脱者在命终时「取中般涅槃」的重要推动力量。 * 利根与现世不涅槃因缘:在《大般涅槃经》中,中般涅槃者被定位为「利根」修行者。这类修行者之所以不在现世直接入涅槃,是因为其现世「四大羸劣」(身体状况不佳),或缺乏房舍、饮食、衣服、卧具、医药等外部助缘,导致心神受到妨碍,因而未能在现世入涅槃。

2. 三种品类的划分 《大般涅槃经》将「中涅槃」依证悟时机的早晚进一步细分为上、中、下三品: * 上品者:「舍身未离欲界便得涅槃」; * 中品者:「始离欲界,未至色界便得涅槃」; * 下品者:「离欲界已,至色界边乃得涅槃」。 此外,该经还从阿那含人的四种心境(非学非无学、学、无学、非学非无学入于涅槃)来解释其名义,因在这四心中「二是涅槃,二非涅槃」,故称「中般涅槃」。

3. 欲界有而色界无的原因 《大般涅槃经》中,佛陀向迦叶菩萨解释了为何中涅槃只存在于欲界而色界没有: * 欲界的烦恼因缘兼具「内」与「外」两种,而色界没有外在因缘; * 欲界修行者能对「欲爱」与「色爱」进行至心的呵责,并能呵责悭、贪、瞋、妬、无惭、无愧等粗重烦恼; * 欲界之道的性质最为「勇健」,在此界能证得四沙门果,因此欲界有中涅槃,而色界则无。

4. 中涅槃者的状态比喻 《大般涅槃经》以「䱜鱼得食已住」来比喻中涅槃者的「住」:他们处在色界及无色界得受身,不再受生于欲界的五道(人、天、地狱、畜生、饿鬼),且已断除无量烦恼,不再与凡夫共事,远离悭贪瞋恚。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同部类的经典中,对于该概念的用词存在细微差异: 1. 《杂阿含经》(阿含部):该概念被统一表述为「中般涅槃」。 2. 《大般涅槃经》(涅槃部):则交替使用「中般涅槃」与「中涅槃」两种表述。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 在解脱果位序列中的位置 《杂阿含经》中,中般涅槃具有明确的层级定位,介于现法涅槃与生般涅槃之间。具体递进序列为:现法智证乐(或称现法智有余涅槃)、中般涅槃、生般涅槃、无行般涅槃与有行般涅槃、上流般涅槃。若修行者未能证得上述任一涅槃果位,则会凭借「欲法、念法、乐法」的功德往生至大梵天等梵天界,或自性光音天等天界。

2. 与「见法般涅槃」的对比 《杂阿含经》中,「见法般涅槃」是指比丘在当下生命中,对老、病、死产生厌离、离欲、灭尽,不起诸漏而心善解脱的现世状态。而「中般涅槃」则明确发生在「命终时」,且伴随着「五下分结尽」的成就。

3. 与其他涅槃类型的对比 《大般涅槃经》将「中般涅槃」与以下几种涅槃并列对比: * 「受身涅槃」:指舍弃欲界身受色界身,尽其寿命才断除三界烦恼入涅槃; * 「行般涅槃」:常修行道,依靠有为三昧之力断除烦恼而入涅槃; * 「无行般涅槃」:因确信必得涅槃而生懈怠,最终在寿尽时依靠有为三昧力入涅槃; * 「上流般涅槃」:生于初禅后因爱心退生,经历各禅天,最终尽寿命而般涅槃。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《杂阿含经》:「比丘若能修习、多修习七觉分……命终时五下分结尽,得中般涅槃。」 2. 《杂阿含经》:「若未得心解脱,而有欲法、念法、乐法,以此功德,命终时取中般涅槃。」 3. 《大般涅槃经》:「中般涅槃者,舍欲界身,未至色界,以利根故,于中涅槃。」 4. 《大般涅槃经》:「中涅槃者复有三种:一者上、二者中、三者下。上者舍身未离欲界便得涅槃,中者始离欲界未至色界便得涅槃,下者离欲界已至色界边乃得涅槃。」

By SutraAI-generated

中阿含經T0026 · 阿含部

本經《中阿含經》於論說「中般涅槃」時,將之置於「七善人所往至處及無餘涅槃」之教學框架中。世尊告諸比丘:「我當為汝說七善人所往至處及無餘涅槃,諦聽,諦聽!善思念之。」可知本經係就聖者所證究竟處而立七種分位之判,中般涅槃即為其中之一。

就核心表述而言,經文以「少慢未盡,五下分結已斷」一句總括得中般涅槃者之位次。謂其人雖已斷五下分結,然「慢」猶有少分殘存,故未能於當生即證無餘涅槃;又其慧行相為「無上息迹慧之所見,然未得證」,即慧已徹見滅諦之迹理,而涅槃尚未親證。所踐之行,經中以「我者無我,亦無我所,當來無我,亦無我所,已有便斷,已斷得捨,有樂不染,合會不著」反覆宣說——離於我相、我所相,未來亦復如是,已生即斷,已斷即捨,於諸樂不染、於諸合會不著。

本經論此概念最為獨特之側面,在於以三個連環譬喻,細分中般涅槃為三種層位,皆冠以「是謂第幾善人所往至處,世間諦如有」之結語,確認此為如實之世間真理。其一,喻如「燒䴸,纔燃便滅」——火星初燃即逝,比喻少慢速盡、隨即而證。其二,喻如「鐵洞燃俱熾,以椎打之,迸火飛空,上已即滅」——猛利進業、火星高飛而於空中即滅,比喻勤修勇猛、離染即證。其三,喻如「鐵洞燃俱熾,以椎打之,迸火飛空,從上來還,未至地滅」——火星昇已還落、未至地前而滅,比喻稍經迴轉方證。三喻同顯中般涅槃之義,而各從速疾、猛利、稍緩之相而立差別。

就術語形式觀之,本經對此概念直稱「中般涅槃」,未嘗使用其他異譯;其位次之判定以「五下分結」、「少慢」、「無上息迹慧」三項為基準,其中「無上息迹慧」乃本經用以總括行者慧眼已見息滅之迹而未得親證之特殊術語。「中」字所指則依其「五下分結已斷而慢未盡、未得親證」之位次而立。又經中以「七善人所往至處」將中般涅槃立為聖者命終後究竟歸趣之一,與「無餘涅槃」並舉而別,顯示其在七善人教說中之獨立分位。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

本經(《雜阿含經》)論及「中般涅槃」,主要將其置於修習七覺分所得之果利序列中,並與其他幾種般涅槃並列呈現,未見獨立之專門定義。

一、作為七覺分修習之七果之一

經中以「修習七覺分,多修習已,當得七果」之框架列舉成就,中般涅槃即七果之一。chunk:7705 載其次第為:「現法智證樂」→「命終時」若不得現法智證樂者→「五下分結盡,中般涅槃」→若不得中般涅槃者,依次為生般涅槃、無行般涅槃、有行般涅槃、上流般涅槃。chunk:7712 措辭略異,作「現法智有餘涅槃,及命終時,若不爾者,五下分結盡,得中般涅槃」,餘下次第相同。本經係以「若不得前而得後」的層退方式標示中般涅槃之位次——次於現法智證樂(或現法智有餘涅槃)及命終時證果,而高於生般等其餘四種般涅槃。

二、依「五下分結盡」而立

上述兩處原文皆明言,中般涅槃之取得以「五下分結盡」為前提。此即經中對「不還者」之定位——已斷五下分結,得不還果,然未於現法或命終時究竟證果,遂於此位入滅。

三、依「欲法、念法、樂法」而取

chunk:7962 與 chunk:7964 另從「若不得解脫」或「若不解脫」之脈絡,論「以彼法,欲法、念法、樂法取中般涅槃」。以「欲法、念法、樂法」三法為能取之因,中般涅槃等為所取之果,並列生般涅槃、有行般涅槃、無行般涅槃、上流般涅槃為替代選項。「取」字暗示行者以此三法為資糧,於命終後取證中般涅槃。

四、術語特點

本經所用語詞值得注意者:

• 般涅槃之種類皆以「○○般涅槃」構成,中般涅槃即其中一項,與生般、無行般、有行般、上流般並列。

• chunk:7964 另出「漏心解脫」一詞,作「欲有漏心解脫、有有漏心解脫、無明漏心解脫」,為本經獨特之解脫分類。

• 「欲法、念法、樂法」三法為本經論述取證中般涅槃之獨特因緣措辭,僅見於後兩段,七覺分之段未用此說。

• 七果之首在 chunk:7705 作「現法智證樂」,在 chunk:7712 則作「現法智有餘涅槃」,兩處措辭有別。

五、整體論述結構

全經對中般涅槃之論述並無獨立完整之定義,而是嵌入兩種不同的果位序列:一是七覺分修習之七果序列,二是「若不得解脫」之替代取證序列。中般涅槃在兩種序列中皆居較前之位——前者居第三位(在現法智證樂、命終時證果之後),後者居第一位選項——顯示其在非還者五種般涅槃分類中具有較高地位。

大般涅槃經(北本)T0374 · 涅槃部

《大般涅槃經(北本)》將般涅槃分為五種:不還者(阿那含)依根性與時節之別,有中般、受身般、行般、無行般、上流般五種差別。其中「中般涅槃」的核心定義為:阿那含「捨欲界身,未至色界,以利根故,於中涅槃」——即在捨離欲界身後、尚未投生色界之前,於中有位即證入涅槃,故名「中般」。

經中進一步說明「中般涅槃」之名由來:阿那含人有四種心——非學非無學、學、無學、非學非無學入於涅槃;其中二是涅槃、二非涅槃,介於涅槃與非涅槃之間,故稱為「中般涅槃」。

中般涅槃又分上、中、下三品:「上者,捨身未離欲界便得涅槃;中者,始離欲界,未至色界便得涅槃;下者,離欲界已,至色界邊乃得涅槃」。

經中並特別解釋「欲界有中涅槃、色界則無」之因緣。其一,阿那含現在四大羸劣、資緣不具,或心多憙教化、怱務不定,故不能現在涅槃,需於中有位證入。其二,欲界煩惱因緣有二——內因緣與外因緣——而色界中無外因緣;又欲界有欲愛、色愛二種愛心可至心呵責,而色界無此二愛可呵,故欲界能呵責慳貪、瞋妬、無慚無愧等粗煩惱而入涅槃。再者,「欲界道其性勇健,何以故?得四果故」,因此唯欲界可容中般涅槃。

迦葉菩薩並問:若利根者,何不現在入涅槃?佛以舍衛國阿那邠低精舍比丘之事為例,說明無量眾生因所乏、妨亂其心而不得現在涅槃,可見中般涅槃之存在正為接引根利而因緣未具者。

需注意者,經中論及此概念時所用的術語:經稱此類行人為「阿那含」(即不還果聖者),並以「中般涅槃」、「中涅槃」二名並用;又將「中般」與「受身般」、「行般」、「無行般」、「上流般」並列為五種般涅槃之差別。此外,此處所證之「涅槃」於本經被判為「非大涅槃」,以其無常樂我淨,或因還生煩惱有習氣故,唯有常樂我淨方得名大涅槃。

Related