Dharma · AI Companion

有行般涅槃

sasaṃskāra-parinirvāyin

经由加行修习而证般涅槃。AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Means

In the landscape of early Buddhist soteriology, liberation is not a uniform, static event. Rather, it unfolds according to an individual’s spiritual faculties, accumulated momentum, and applied effort. Among the stages of noble attainments (*ariya-phala*), the Non-returner (*Anāgāmi* [阿那含]) occupies a crucial threshold: one who has permanently severed the Five Lower Fetters (*pañca-orambhāgiyāni-saṁyojanāni* [五下分結]) and will "never again return to this realm" (*bù fù huán shēng cǐ shì* [不復還生此世]), namely the Desire Realm (*Kāmadhātu* [欲界]).

When an *Anāgāmi* does not achieve complete final Nirvana (*Parinibbāna* [般涅槃]) during their present human lifetime (*diṭṭhe va dhamme* [現法]), they are reborn in the higher Fine-material Realm (*Rūpadhātu* [色界]) to complete their journey. Within early Āgama texts—most notably the *Saṃyuktāgama* (*Zá Āhán Jīng* [雜阿含經], T0099)—the path of the Non-returner is categorized into five distinct trajectories. Among them is Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī (*Yǒu xíng bān niè pán* [有行般涅槃]), translated literally as "Parinibbāna with Exertion" or "Parinibbāna with Prompted Effort."

To understand *Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī* with canonical precision, we must break down its foundational components:

1. The Premise: Complete Eradication of the Five Lower Fetters

An individual who enters the trajectory of *Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī* is not an ordinary practitioner, nor merely a Stream-enterer (*Sotāpanna* [預流]) or Once-returner (*Sakadāgāmi* [一來]). They have entirely uprooted the five bondages that anchor a mind to sensory existence: 1. Identity View (*sakkāya-diṭṭhi* [身見]): The foundational illusion that any of the five aggregates (*pañcakhandhā* [五蘊]) constitutes a permanent self. 2. Clinging to Rites and Rituals (*sīlabbata-parāmāsa* [戒禁取/戒取]): The mistaken belief that external moral rules, ascetical practices, or rituals alone guarantee purification without wisdom. 3. Skeptical Doubt (*vicikicchā* [疑]): Hesitation or indecision regarding the Buddha, the Dharma, the Saṅgha, and the efficacy of the Noble Eightfold Path. 4. Sensual Desire (*kāmacchanda* [貪欲]): Craving for sights, sounds, smells, tastes, and tactile sensations rooted in the Desire Realm. 5. Ill Will / Aversion (*vyāpāda* [瞋恚]): Resistance, anger, or hatred toward unpleasant objects or experiences.

Because these five fetters are extinguished, the practitioner’s mind has no remaining gravity pulling it back to birth as a human, animal, or realm of suffering.

2. The Defining Quality: "With Exertion" (*Sāsaṅkhāra* / 有行)

The prefix *sā-* means "with," and *saṅkhāra* (in this context) refers to active application, intentional exertion, or mental prompting (*jiāxíng* [加行] / *gōngyòng* [功用]). * **Contrast with *Asāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī*** (*Wú xíng bān niè pán* [無行般涅槃], "Parinibbāna without Exertion"): In *Asāsaṅkhāra*, the practitioner's prior momentum of wisdom is so ripe that final liberation occurs effortlessly, spontaneously, or without needing intense intentional effort upon rebirth. * **In *Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī***: Upon being reborn in the Pure Abodes (*Suddhāvāsa* [淨居天]) or other fine-material heavens, residual subtle defilements—specifically the Five Upper Fetters (desire for form, desire for formlessness, conceit, restlessness, and ignorance)—remain somewhat stubborn. To dismantle these final, refined illusions, the practitioner must actively re-engage vigorous meditation, deliberate contemplation, and continuous exertion (*sāsaṅkhāra*).

3. Canonical Causes and Textual Nuances

The *Saṃyuktāgama* outlines two primary spiritual engines that fuel this attainment: 1. The Seven Factors of Awakening (*Satta Bojjhaṅgā* [七覺分]): Intensive cultivation of *Mindfulness* (*sati* [念]), *Investigation of Phenomena* (*dhamma-vicaya* [擇法]), *Energy* (*viriya* [精進]), *Rapture* (*pīti* [喜]), *Tranquility* (*passaddhi* [輕安]), *Concentration* (*samādhi* [定]), and *Equanimity* (*upekkha* [捨]). Even if full liberation isn't clinched at death, this systematic training secures *Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī* in the next realm. 2. Dharma-Aspiration, Mindfulness, and Joy (*yù fǎ, niàn fǎ, lè fǎ* [欲法、念法、樂法]): An intense desire/aspiration for the Dharma (*dhamma-chanda*), constant recollection of the Dharma, and profound joy derived from spiritual truth. This devotional and intellectual alignment acts as a powerful karmic legacy.

Interestingly, the *Saṃyuktāgama* records two listings of the five *Anāgāmi* paths, reflecting differences in spiritual temperaments: * In the Seven Factors sequence: Intermediate Parinibbāna (*Antarā-parinibbāyī* [中般涅槃]) $\rightarrow$ Parinibbāna upon Rebirth (*Upahacca-parinibbāyī* [生般涅槃]) $\rightarrow$ Parinibbāna without Exertion (*Asāsaṅkhāra* [無行般涅槃]) $\rightarrow$ Parinibbāna with Exertion (*Sāsaṅkhāra* [有行般涅槃]) $\rightarrow$ Upstream Bound (*Uddhamsoto-akanittha-gāmī* [上流般涅槃]). Here, "without exertion" precedes "with exertion," highlighting a scale where spontaneous insight is placed above deliberate effort. * In the Dharma-Aspiration sequence: Intermediate $\rightarrow$ Rebirth $\rightarrow$ Parinibbāna with Exertion $\rightarrow$ Parinibbāna without Exertion $\rightarrow$ Upstream Bound. Here, active exertion is listed earlier, showing that persistent practice provides a direct bridge right after rebirth.

In the total map of Buddhist liberation, *Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī* embodies a crucial principle: even when profound spiritual breakthroughs have freed us from coarse suffering, the final inch of ultimate freedom often demands deliberate, conscious, and unflagging application.


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

To grasp *Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī* without reducing it to an abstract dogmatic label, let us map its underlying psychological mechanics onto contemporary human experience.

While full *Anāgāmi* status implies an advanced level of consciousness beyond ordinary mundane life, its structural dynamic—moving past coarse addictions, transitioning to a refined environment, but requiring intentional effort to overcome subtle inertia—mirrors profound transformative journeys we see today.

Step 1: Clearing the Lower Fetters (The Coarse Reset)

Imagine a contemporary senior engineer, Alex, who spent fifteen years trapped in toxic workplace consumerism, severe anxiety, and social comparison. * Overcoming Identity View & Doubt: Alex realizes that his job title, social media metrics, and wealth are not his core identity. He drops the obsession with prestige. * Overcoming Sensual Craving & Aversion: Through dedicated mindfulness training, he loses his compulsive appetite for doomscrolling, alcohol, late-night hedonism, and reactive anger at difficult colleagues.

This mirrors the extinction of the Five Lower Fetters. Alex has effectively "retired" from the sensory rat race (*Desire Realm*). He can no longer be enticed by cheap drama or consumerist rewards.

Step 2: Transition to a Higher Environment (Rebirth in Form Realm)

Alex leaves the volatile startup scene and moves to a quiet, hyper-focused research institute dedicated to deep creative work. The noise of the city is replaced by serene spaces, high-minded intellectual discussions, and stable routines.

This environment represents the **Fine-material Realm (*Rūpadhātu*)**: coarse sensory chaos is gone, replaced by clarity, mental stability, and refined focus.

Step 3: The Subtle Trap and the Need for "Exertion" (*Sāsaṅkhāra*)

However, a subtle issue emerges in this tranquil new environment. Freed from gross anxieties and physical chaos, Alex encounters a different, quieter barrier: * He feels a subtle, quiet pride in his peaceful lifestyle (*conceit* / *māna*). * He experiences occasional mental micro-restlessness when trying to sit in pure silence (*restlessness* / *uddhacca*). * He enjoys the bliss of intellectual quietude so much that he hesitates to look deeper into the subtle roots of selfhood (*desire for form/formlessness*).

Here lies the exact difference between *Asāsaṅkhāra* (Without Exertion) and *Sāsaṅkhāra* (With Exertion): * **If Alex were in *Asāsaṅkhāra***: The moment he sat in the peaceful office, his prior momentum would instantly dissolve these subtle attachments without any conscious effort. * **Because Alex is in *Sāsaṅkhāra***: Peace alone is not enough to automatically liberate him. He cannot simply "coast." To break through these ultra-fine layers of inertia, Alex must actively apply deliberate techniques: re-initiating the Seven Factors of Awakening—investigating mental phenomena (*dhamma-vicaya*), applying conscious energy (*viriya*), and recalibrating mindfulness (*sati*).

Common Misidentifications in Daily Life

* **Misconception 1: Confusing Worldly Workaholic Effort with *Sāsaṅkhāra*** People often mistake grinding late hours at a corporate job for "exertion." Canonical *sāsaṅkhāra* in this context is not stressful, anxiety-driven physical work; it is the refined, internal application of spiritual faculties (*indriya*) aimed at eradicating subtle spiritual ignorance. * Misconception 2: Confusing Heavenly Comfort with Final Freedom Many practitioners assume that entering a calm, elevated mental state (or a literal fine-material heavenly rebirth) is the finish line. *Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī* reminds us that refined calm is merely the *environment*; active exertion is still required to dismantle the lingering subtle fetters.


Contemporary People Need It

In an era dominated by automated conveniences, algorithmic feedback loops, and frictionless experiences, human culture increasingly equates progress with "effortlessness." Modern technology promises instant gratification without friction: zero-click ordering, automated recommendations, and generative AI tools that synthesize thought on our behalf.

This hyper-frictionless culture creates a subtle psychological pathology: the expectation that deep internal transformation should also happen without effort.

1. Counteracting the "Instant Awakening" Trap

Many modern spiritual seekers fall prey to superficial shortcuts—seeking sudden "non-dual awakenings" or instant therapeutic cures while bypassing disciplined practice. When they experience a temporary breakthrough (such as a glimpse of selflessness or a serene meditation retreat), they assume they are fully liberated.

*Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī* provides a sobering, realistic blueprint. It tells us: **Even a high holy person (*Anāgāmi*) who has completely eliminated all sensual craving and anger may still require deliberate, active exertion to reach complete Parinibbāna.** If an advanced practitioner cannot rely purely on passive momentum, contemporary seekers cannot expect permanent liberation through effortless casualness.

2. Dialogue with Modern Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence

We can draw an insightful comparison with neuroplasticity and machine learning architectures, while recognizing the inherent limitations of such analogies: * Algorithmic Analogy: In modern AI systems, pre-training a large model on vast datasets removes coarse errors (analogous to severing lower fetters). However, to make the model operate with absolute precision in specialized domains, deliberate, highly targeted "fine-tuning" and "reinforcement learning" (*sāsaṅkhāra*) are mandatory. * Cognitive Plasticity: Brain research demonstrates that while passive exposure can rewire basic habits, breaking deeply ingrained higher-order cognitive biases requires active executive control, conscious attention, and deliberate cognitive reframing.

*Caveat & Limitation*: While cognitive science studies structural neural re-wiring, Buddhist *sāsaṅkhāra* operates on the level of *kamma*, volition (*cetanā*), and the ultimate cessation of *dependent origination* (*paṭiccasamuppāda* [緣起]). Neural conditioning belongs to conditioned phenomena (*saṅkhata*); Parinibbāna is the unconditioned (*asaṅkhata*). Science describes the mechanism of the container; Buddhism provides the path to transcend the container altogether.

3. Hope for the "Hard-Working" Practitioner

*Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī* offers profound encouragement. It validates the struggles of practitioners who feel that their spiritual progress requires constant, deliberate effort. It assures us that needing intentional exertion (*jiāxíng*) is not a sign of failure or inferior spirituality—it is a recognized, noble, and effective path within the Buddha's map of liberation.


Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications

To ensure rigorous understanding, we must address four prevalent misconceptions regarding *Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī*:

Misunderstanding 1: Treating *Sāsaṅkhāra* as Coarse Physical or Mental Strain

* Clarification: In everyday language, "effort" (*行/加行*) often implies muscular tension, mental exhaustion, or stressful striving. In canonical Abhidharma and Agama discourse, *sāsaṅkhāra* in *Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī* refers specifically to volitional spiritual application (*gōngyòng* [功用]). It is the deliberate alignment of the Seven Factors of Awakening—such as intentional investigation of phenomena (*dhamma-vicaya*) and sustained energy (*viriya*)—applied to dissolve subtle mental obscurations. It is calm, precise, and deeply clear, not agitated or stressful.

Misunderstanding 2: Confusing *Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī* with Rebirth in the Lower Realms

* Clarification: Some assume that because "exertion" is needed, the practitioner must still be struggling in realms of suffering. This is canonically impossible. A practitioner of *Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī* is definitively an Anāgāmi (Non-returner). They have irrevocably eradicated the Five Lower Fetters. They will never be reborn in the lower realms (*Duggati*), nor even in the human or lower deva realms of the Desire Realm. Their rebirth takes place exclusively in the refined Fine-material Realm (*Rūpadhātu*), specifically within realms like the Pure Abodes (*Suddhāvāsa*).

Misunderstanding 3: Viewing "With Exertion" (*Sāsaṅkhāra*) as Inferior to "Without Exertion" (*Asāsaṅkhāra*) in an Absolute Sense

* Clarification: While *Asāsaṅkhāra* represents a state where prior wisdom momentum is so mature that liberation occurs spontaneously, both types reach the exact same ultimate result: the unconditioned, complete Parinibbāna. Once the five upper fetters are severed, there is no difference whatsoever in the freedom experienced by an Arahant who attained it with exertion versus one who attained it without exertion. The distinction lies purely in the *methodology of the final transition*, not in the quality of liberation itself.

Misunderstanding 4: Mistaking "Desire for the Dharma" (*Yù Fǎ* [欲法]) for Unwholesome Craving (*Taṇhā* [貪])

* Clarification: The textual basis of *Sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī* includes the triad of "Desire for the Dharma, Mindfulness of the Dharma, and Joy in the Dharma" (*yù fǎ, niàn fǎ, lè fǎ* [欲法、念法、樂法]). Modern readers often stumble upon "Desire for the Dharma" (*yù fǎ*), asking: *Isn't all desire (*taṇhā*) supposed to be abandoned?* In Buddhist terminology, we must distinguish between *Taṇhā* (unwholesome craving rooted in delusion and self-cherishing) and *Chanda* / *Dhamma-chanda* (wholesome spiritual desire, orientation, or aspiration toward truth). *Yù fǎ* is the constructive spiritual orientation that propels the mind toward practice. It is the ladder one climbs to reach the roof; once the roof (Parinibbāna) is reached, the ladder is set aside. Without this healthy aspiration (*dhamma-chanda*), the energy needed for *Sāsaṅkhāra* (intentional exertion) could never be generated.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

1. 定义与核心要义

「有行般涅槃」(梵语:sāsaṅkhāra-parinibbāyī)是佛教阿含部经典中关于阿那含(不还)果位的重要修行范畴。在《雜阿含經》(《雜阿含經》)的论述中,该概念特指修行者在未能于现法(即当下这一生)中证得完全解脱(现法智证乐或现法智有余涅槃)时,因其已经彻底断除了「五下分结」,从而在后世受生于色界等相应界域中,通过有加行、有功用的修行(即「有行」)而证入最终般涅槃的一种圣者果位。这一概念的核心要义在于,它既标示了修行者已经脱离了欲界的生死轮回,又揭示了其在更高界域中实现解脱时,仍需依赖特定修行功德与加行努力的解脱路径。

2. 主要阐述

在《雜阿含經》中,关于「有行般涅槃」的论述主要围绕其证得的因缘、修行方法以及在诸般涅槃序列中的位置展开。

首先,在证因与修行方法上,经文提供了两种主要的修行路径: 1. 「七觉分」的修习:经文指出,若比丘能够精勤修习、多修习七觉分(择法、精进、喜、轻安、念、定、舍),虽然他们可能因为根缺或因缘未具,未能于现法中证得现法智证乐,也未能于临命终时证得现法智有余涅槃,但由于他们已经彻底断尽了「五下分结」,因此可以依序证得中般涅槃、生般涅槃、无行般涅槃,进而证得「有行般涅槃」。这表明,七觉分的系统修持是通往有行般涅槃的决定性法门。 2. 「欲法、念法、乐法」的功德:经文指出,若修行者在现世未能即生获得完全解脱,但凭借着对佛法的强烈欲求(欲法)、时常忆念(念法)以及深切喜乐(乐法),以此功德力,亦可在命终后依序取中般涅槃、生般涅槃,进而取「有行般涅槃」。这说明,对佛法法义的内在好乐与忆念,同样是促成有行般涅槃的重要动力。

其次,关于「有行般涅槃」在诸般涅槃果位中的顺序,经文在不同的修行脉络中呈现了两种不同的排列方式,反映了修行路径的多样性: 1. 七觉分脉络(七果/七种福利):在此脉络下,「有行般涅槃」被置于「无行般涅槃」之后、「上流般涅槃」之前。其完整的递进顺序为:中般涅槃、生般涅槃、无行般涅槃、有行般涅槃、上流般涅槃。 2. 欲法、念法、乐法脉络:在此脉络下,其顺序发生了调整,「有行般涅槃」被置于「生般涅槃」之后、「无行般涅槃」之前。其完整的递进顺序调整为:中般涅槃、生般涅槃、有行般涅槃、无行般涅槃、上流般涅槃。这种顺序的差异,体现了不同修行因缘下,圣者证物过程的细微差别。

3. 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《雜阿含經》(《雜阿含經》)中,关于「有行般涅槃」及相关概念的表述具有高度的术语一致性,这为理解该概念提供了稳定的文本基础: 1. 断惑术语:对于修行者所断除的根本烦恼,本经统一使用「五下分結」这一术语来指代身见、戒取、疑、贪欲、瞋恚五种下分结,未见其他异译混用的情况。 2. 意乐表述:在描述修行者对佛法的心理倾向与实践态度时,经文统一使用「欲法、念法、樂法」这一固定词组,以此表述对佛法的欲求、忆念与喜乐,这一表述在相关脉络中保持了高度的统一。 3. 果位判定:在判定证果性质时,经文明确使用「阿那含」这一果位名称,并配合「不復還生此世」的定性描述,以此来规范和界定包括有行般涅槃在内的诸般涅槃圣者的共同特征。

4. 与相关概念的关系

「有行般涅槃」与多个核心佛学概念存在着紧密的逻辑与修行关联: 1. 与「阿那含(不还果)」的关系:二者是属种关系。阿那含是透过断除「五下分结」而证得的果位。「有行般涅槃」则是阿那含果位在具体证悟路径上的五种细分之一。所有证得有行般涅槃的圣者,本质上都是阿那含,他们皆具有「不復還生此世」的共同特征,即不再返还欲界受生,而是在相应的色界等界域中证入最终的般涅槃。 2. 与「无行般涅槃」的关系:二者存在着对比与互补的关系。在修习七觉分的脉络中,无行般涅槃排在有行般涅槃之前;而在欲法、念法、乐法的脉络中,有行般涅槃则排在无行般涅槃之前。这两种般涅槃分别代表了在后世解脱时,是否需要经历「有加行、有功用」(有行)或「无加行、无功用」(无行)的修行过程。 3. 与其他般涅槃的关系:它与「中般涅槃」、「生般涅槃」及「上流般涅槃」共同构成了阿那含圣者在未得现法解脱时的完整解脱谱系。这些果位根据圣者在命终后、受生时、受生后等不同阶段的解脱时机,以及修行的精勤程度进行了系统分类。

5. 代表性原文引用

1. 关于修习七觉分而证得有行般涅槃的经文: 「若比丘修習、多修習七覺分……若未能於現法中得現法智證樂,亦未能於命終時,而能盡五下分結。五下分結盡已,得中般涅槃、生般涅槃、無行般涅槃、有行般涅槃、上流般涅槃。」 2. 关于因「欲法、念法、乐法」而证得有行般涅槃的经文: 「於此法中欲法、念法、樂法……若命終時,得中般涅槃、生般涅槃、有行般涅槃、無行般涅槃、上流般涅槃。」 3. 关于阿那含断惑与不还特征的经文: 「五下分結盡,成阿那含,不復還生此世。」 「得阿那含,不復還生此世,於彼般涅槃。」

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》(劉宋求那跋陀羅譯)論及「有行般涅槃」時,並未給出獨立的定義性說明,而是將其置於五種般涅槃(中般涅槃、生般涅槃、無行般涅槃、有行般涅槃、上流般涅槃)的序列脈絡中加以論述。

一、作為七覺分修習所得果利之一

經中反覆明說:若比丘修習七覺分、多修習已,當得七種果、七種福利。其首項為「現法智證樂」(或稱「現法智有餘涅槃」);若不得現法智證樂,則於命終時得五下分結盡,證「中般涅槃」;若不爾者,依次得「生般涅槃」、「無行般涅槃」、「有行般涅槃」、「上流般涅槃」。

此一陳述結構顯示,「有行般涅槃」在七覺分修習所得果報的序列中,係高於「無行般涅槃」、低於「上流般涅槃」的一個層級。

二、與「無行般涅槃」的序列先後非固定

所引四段經文中,「有行般涅槃」與「無行般涅槃」二者的排列順序並非固定。在以七覺分為論述框架的二段中,次第為中般→生般→無行→有行→上流;而在以「欲法、念法、樂法」為因緣的另二段中,次第則為中般→生般→有行→無行→上流。此種序列差異,係經文本身的陳述方式,本經並未對此加以說明。

三、以「欲法、念法、樂法」為取證因緣

在後兩段經文中,世尊告諸比丘:若彼比丘未能究竟解脫,則以「彼法、欲法、念法、樂法」取「中般涅槃」;若不爾者,取「生般涅槃」;若不爾者,取「有行般涅槃」;若不爾者,取「無行般涅槃」;若不爾者,取「上流般涅槃」;若不爾者,則以欲法、念法、樂法功德生於大梵天、梵輔天、梵身天中,或生於自性光音天、無量光天、少光天等。

此一取證模式顯示,「有行般涅槃」與「無行般涅槃」二者並列於同一取證序列,「有行」與「無行」之差異,於此經中以加行功用之有無為其內在區別。

四、術語形式

「有行般涅槃」一詞於本經為穩定之譯法,與「中般涅槃」、「生般涅槃」、「無行般涅槃」、「上流般涅槃」並列為五種般涅槃。經中未對此五種分別作獨立的釋義,僅以列舉方式呈現於七覺分修習所得果利之序列中。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》將「有行般涅槃」置於五種行色界不還者之中加以論述,並非孤立說明。全頌先列出七種不還者之綱要——「中般、生般、有行般、無行般、上流、現般」——其中有行般屬於已生色界後須經加行方證般涅槃之一類,

本論界定其體相:往生色界後,長時加行不息,由多功用方般涅槃。此人唯具勤修而無速進道,故不能如生般者於受生不久即證。 相較之下,無行者同樣往生色界,但加行懈息、不多功用便般涅槃,以闕勤修與速進道故;生般則以具勤修及速進道故得最速進。其勝劣次第正在於所修道之品級與隨眠厚薄之差。

關於經中先說無行、後說有行的次第問題,本論解釋:由有速進道、無速進道之別,無行者不由功用得,有行者由功用得,故無行在前、有行在後,乃與理相應。 一說以為二種差別在於緣有為聖道抑緣無為聖道而得涅槃,本論判定此說非理,認為有太過之失。

本論指出此處所言般涅槃,謂有餘依;有餘師說亦無餘依,本論不取此說,以彼於捨壽無自在故。

術語方面,本論以「般涅槃」一詞統攝有餘依、無餘依之涅槃果;以「不還者」稱阿那含;以「靜慮」稱禪定,不用禪那、四禪等名;以「色究竟」稱色界最高天;以「有頂」稱非想非非想處天;以「加行」稱修行功夫,以「速進道」與「勤修」對揚道品之功用與速度差異。此等用語皆須如實記錄,以與他經譯名區別。

Related