Dharma · AI Companion

捨心

upekṣā-citta

平等离染、不起爱憎的心。AI-generated

Type Mental factorDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ III · nominal designationInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

舍心初为四无量、七觉支之舍(依缘起平等立,第一重);般若读为性空故平等舍,真常系再读为真如平等,故至第三重。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

One-Sentence Definition: *Upekṣā-citta* (捨心: Equanimous Mind) is a supreme mental state that transcends pain and pleasure, abandons craving and aversion, and abides in radical impartiality, mindfulness, clear comprehension, and boundless compassion.

What This Concept Means

In contemporary language, the word "relinquishment" or "indifference" often carries a cold, passive connotation—a mental retreat, a hardening of the heart, or a fatalistic acceptance of whatever happens. In classical Buddhist thought, however, ***Upekṣā-citta* (捨心)** is precisely the opposite: it is an unshakeable, luminous, and deeply active state of consciousness that stands at the very apex of spiritual liberation.

The Sanskrit term *Upekṣā* is derived from the root *upa* (near, close) and *īkṣ* (to look, to observe). Far from turning a blind eye, *Upekṣā* means to "look on with clarity," observing reality closely without leaning toward attraction or recoiling in aversion. Across early and Mahāyāna scriptures, *Upekṣā-citta* is articulated through several profound, non-reducible layers:

1. The Supreme Cultivation of the Senses (*Anuttara Indriya-bhāvanā* / 無上修根)

In the *Samyukta Āgama* (*T0099*), a famous dialogue occurs between the Buddha and Uttara, a disciple of a rival ascetic tradition [1]. Uttara claims that true sensory mastery consists of "the eye not seeing forms and the ear not hearing sounds." The Buddha gently refutes this, pointing out that by such logic, a blind or deaf person would be a master of the spiritual path [1].

True cultivation (*無上修根*), according to the Buddha, does not mean shutting down sensory channels [1]. Rather, when the six sense faculties (eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind) encounter their corresponding objects—whether pleasant (*可意*), unpleasant (*不可意*), or neutral—the practitioner remains neither captivated nor repulsed. The ultimate realization is described as "desiring to cultivate the Tathāgata’s detachment from both revulsion and non-revulsion, abiding in *Upekṣā* with mindfulness and clear comprehension" (*欲修如來厭、不厭俱離捨心住正念正智*) [1].

2. The Six Constant Dwellings (*Ṣaḍ-satyatā-vihāra* / 六常行)

Building upon sensory mastery, *T0099* details the practice of the "Six Constant Dwellings" (*六常行*) [1]. Whenever a practitioner perceives a sight, sound, smell, taste, tactile sensation, or mental phenomenon, they abide in a state that is "neither painful nor pleasant, resting in *Upekṣā* with mindfulness and clear comprehension" (*不苦、不樂,捨心住正念正智*) [1]. This is not an artificial trance, but a continuous, real-time equilibrium maintained in the thick of daily experience [1].

3. "Mind Like the Earth" (*Equanimity Across All Phenomena*)

The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*T0310*) illustrates the boundless impartiality of *Upekṣā* through primordial natural elements: earth, water, fire, wind, space, and the ultimate reality (*Dharmadhātu*) [2]. The sūtra notes: *"A mind of equanimity is like the earth: it carries all things, whether good or evil, adding nothing and subtracting nothing"* (*等心如地,荷負一切,於善於惡,無所增減*) [2]. Just as the physical earth absorbs sweet perfume and foul waste without swelling with pride or shrinking in disgust, the equanimous mind accommodates all worldly experiences (*世間八風*: gain and loss, fame and disrepute, praise and blame, pleasure and pain) without losing its fundamental poise [2].

4. Inner Liberation vs. Outer Protection: *捨煩惱捨* and *護自他捨*

*T0310* provides a key distinction between two dimensions of *Upekṣā*: * ***捨煩惱捨* (Equanimity Abandoning Affliction):** The spontaneous arising of wisdom that dissolves mental torment, attachment, and resentment when encountering pleasant or adverse conditions [2]. * ***護自他捨* (Equanimity Protecting Self and Other):** A radical, self-sacrificing patience [2]. When subjected to extreme physical harm or persecution, the Bodhisattva maintains absolute *Upekṣā*, seeking no revenge and harboring no hostility [2]. This single act protects the practitioner’s own mind from the poison of anger (*護自*) and prevents the aggressor from incurring deeper karmic destruction through escalations of violence (*護他*) [2]. This state is also termed "Extreme Non-Disputation" (*無諍極捨*) and "Observation of the Essential Self" (*觀自體捨*) [2].

5. Wisdom-Driven Equanimity and Timely Application (*智捨心* & *時非時捨*)

In the *Mahāsaṃnipāta Sūtra* (*T0397*), the Buddha’s *Upekṣā* is defined as *智捨心*—an equanimity forged directly out of supreme wisdom (*Prajñā*), inseparable from Great Compassion (*共大悲捨*) [3].

Crucially, Mahāyāna scriptures warn against abusing *Upekṣā* as a cover for callous indifference [2, 3]. *T0310* and *T0397* explicitly state that the Buddha *does not* permit a Bodhisattva to remain passive in *Upekṣā* when witnessing sentient beings in torment (*諸佛世尊不聽菩薩於諸眾生而行捨心*) [2, 3]. Instead, the Bodhisattva must master ***時非時捨* (Timely and Untimely Equanimity)**: knowing when to step back into detachment to purge defilements, and when to step forward into tireless, active intervention [2, 3].

6. The Ultimate Transcendence: Beyond Clinging to Equanimity

At its highest fruit, *Upekṣā-citta* leads to the "Sphere of Nothingness" (*無所有入處*) in deep meditative absorption [1]. Yet, in its ultimate, unconditioned expression, *Upekṣā* transcends even the concept of "being equanimous." As *T0310* records, liberation reaches "no taking and no abandoning" (*無取亦無捨*), where one no longer generates concepts of "equality versus inequality" (*不起平等不平等心*) [2]. It is complete, natural freedom.


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

To see how *Upekṣā-citta* operates outside ancient text, let us walk through four commonplace scenarios of contemporary life, mapping them directly onto classical canonical definitions.

``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Six Sense Faculties │ │ (Eye, Ear, Nose, Tongue, Body, Mind) │ └────────────────────┬────────────────────┘ │ Encountering Sense Objects (Notifications, Insults, Illness, Suffering) │ ┌──────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────┐ ▼ ▼ ┌──────────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────────┐ │ The Reactive Ego │ │ *Upekṣā-citta* │ ├──────────────────────┤ ├──────────────────────┤ │ • Craving (貪) │ │ • Mindfulness & Clear│ │ • Aversion (瞋) │ │ Comprehension │ │ • Volitional Rejection│ │ (正念正智) │ │ • Passive Apathy │ │ • "Like Wind" │ └──────────┬───────────┘ │ • Mind Like Earth │ │ └──────────┬───────────┘ ▼ ▼ ┌───────────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────────┐ │ Perpetual Suffering │ │ Spiritual Freedom │ │ & Karmic Entanglement │ │ & Great Compassion │ └───────────────────────┘ └───────────────────────┘ ```

Scenario A: Doomscrolling and Notification Overload

* The Context: You pick up your smartphone. Within thirty seconds, the algorithm feeds you an infuriating political scandal, followed by a peer's glowing luxury vacation post, followed by a passive-aggressive work email. * The Misstep: You fall into the false dichotomy of either getting swept into outrage/envy (craving and aversion) or deleting all technology and retreating into complete isolation—which mirrors Uttara’s ancient ascetic mistake ("eye not seeing, ear not hearing") [1]. * **The *Upekṣā* Walkthrough: You apply the Six Constant Dwellings (*六常行*)** [1]. As pixels land on your retina and concepts form in your mind, you feel the physical surges of irritation or envy rise. Rather than acting on them or suppressing them, you observe them with *mindfulness and clear comprehension* (*正念正智*) [1]. You recognize the content as impermanent, conditioned phenomena. The mind remains unmoved—neither captivated by the pleasant nor panicking at the unpleasant [1].

Scenario B: Toxic Workplace Confrontation

* The Context: During a meeting, a colleague loudly criticizes your performance, framing a minor oversight as a catastrophic failure on your part. * The Misstep: You either explode in defensive counter-attack (initiating a cycle of vengeance) or swallow your anger bitterly, feeling victimized and brooding for days. * **The *Upekṣā* Walkthrough:** You invoke the teaching from *T0397*: viewing harsh words **"all like wind passing" (*皆悉如風*)** [3]. Harsh vocal vibrations reach the eardrum; your mind observes them without attaching an ego-narrative ("How dare *they* say that to *me*!"). You practice ***護自他捨* (Equanimity Protecting Self and Other)** [2, 3]: by refusing to ignite anger within yourself, you protect your own peace (*護自*); by refusing to retaliate, you stop the conflict from escalating, protecting your colleague from incurring worse interpersonal karma (*護他*) [2, 3].

Scenario C: Facing Severe Illness or Physical Pain

* The Context: You are dealing with chronic physical pain or undergoing a painful medical procedure. * The Misstep: Confusing Buddhist equanimity with stoic denial, telling yourself "I shouldn't feel pain," and then falling into despair when the body aches. * **The *Upekṣā* Walkthrough:** Consider the canonical account of the Buddha in *T0099* when his foot was pierced by a stone splinter (*金鎗刺足*) [1]. Severe pain arose in his physical body, yet through *Upekṣā* anchored in clear comprehension, he remained "enduring and self-composed without regression" (*身生諸苦痛,而能行捨心,正智正念住,堪忍以自安*) [1]. *Upekṣā* separates the raw physical sensation (*Vedanā* / 受) from the psychological secondary arrow of panic and resentment. The body hurts, but the mind does not suffer.

Scenario D: Caregiver Fatigue and Boundary Setting

* The Context: You are caring for an aging, sick family member or a struggling child. You feel burnt out, exhausted, and tempted to emotionally check out entirely to protect yourself. * The Misstep: You check out mentally, treating your loved one with cold, robotic distance, calling it "detachment." * **The *Upekṣā* Walkthrough: You apply *時非時捨* (Timely and Untimely Equanimity) alongside *共大悲捨* (Equanimity Co-arising with Great Compassion)** [2, 3]. *T0310* explicitly forbids standing by with indifference when seeing someone in pain [2]. True *Upekṣā* gives you the emotional space to care for the person tirelessly without clutching to specific outcomes or trying to control what cannot be controlled. You step in to serve actively (*Great Compassion*), while letting go of ego-driven anxiety over the results (*Equanimity*) [2, 3].


Why Modern People Need It

We live in an age dominated by the "attention economy"—an infrastructure engineered precisely to hijack our reward systems through craving (*貪*) and outrage (*瞋*). Every swipe, click, and headline is optimized to keep our minds oscillating violently between attraction and aversion.

In this environment, modern human beings are chronically depleted. We alternate between emotional hyper-reactivity (getting burned by every passing event) and emotional dissociation (burnout, numbness, and cynicism).

*Upekṣā-citta* offers a radical alternative: an unshakeable internal grounding.

*Upekṣā* vs. Contemporary Analogies

1. Modern Psychology and Emotional Regulation

Modern therapies like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) emphasize emotional regulation and distress tolerance. While highly beneficial, their primary goal is typically functional adaptation—helping a person manage stress so they can continue to operate effectively in work and society.

*Upekṣā*, by contrast, goes far deeper. It does not merely manage symptoms; it dismantles the root illusion of a fixed, possessive ego (*I, me, mine*) that gets stressed in the first place [2]. It transforms emotional management into an avenue for total spiritual liberation (*Vimutti*).

2. Neuroscience and Algorithmic Analogies

In contemporary neuroscience, we might describe *Upekṣā* as down-regulating the amygdala and quietening the Default Mode Network (DMN), allowing the prefrontal cortex to observe sensory inputs without triggering an immediate fight-or-flight cascade. We might compare the equanimous mind to an advanced firewall that processes incoming data packets without allowing malware (affliction) to execute.

However, we must recognize the clear boundaries of such analogies: * Science measures physiology, not liberation: Neuroimaging can track blood flow and brainwave activity, but it cannot measure or verify the transcendent realization of emptiness (*Śūnyatā*), the eradication of underlying karmic latencies (*Anusaya*), or the attainment of the "Sphere of Nothingness" (*無所有入處*) [1]. * Tool vs. Trait: Technology uses filters to block data; *Upekṣā* does not block anything. It is an open, spacious awareness that allows all reality to pass through unhindered—like wind through the open sky [3].


Common Misinterpretations and Clarifications

Because the Chinese character *捨* can mean "to discard" or "to abandon," and the English word "equanimity" is easily confused with "indifference," *Upekṣā-citta* is frequently misunderstood. Let us clarify four major misconceptions:

1. Misconception: *Upekṣā* is cold indifference or emotional numbness.

* Clarification: Cold apathy is what classical Buddhism calls the "near enemy" of equanimity. Apathy is rooted in dullness and delusion (*Moha*), where one turns away from reality because one cannot handle it. True *Upekṣā* is rooted in *wisdom* (*智捨心*) and *mindfulness/clear comprehension* (*正念正智*) [1, 3]. It is not a frozen wall, but a warm, vast capacity—like the earth (*等心如地*)—that hosts all life without prejudice [2].

2. Misconception: *Upekṣā* means withdrawing from the world and avoiding sense experiences.

* Clarification: This was precisely Uttara's error in *T0099* [1]. True *Upekṣā* does not require closing your eyes or hiding in a cave. The *Six Constant Dwellings* (*六常行*) are realized precisely when eyes see forms, ears hear sounds, and the mind confronts complex daily situations [1]. Freedom is found *within* sensory engagement, not in escaping it [1].

3. Misconception: Practicing *Upekṣā* means sitting back and doing nothing when others suffer.

* Clarification: Sūtras like *T0310* and *T0397* explicitly forbid this, stating that a Bodhisattva must never remain passively in *Upekṣā* when seeing beings in distress [2, 3]. The sūtras mandate ***時非時捨* (Timely/Untimely Equanimity)** [2, 3]. True equanimity provides the stability necessary to engage in radical, effective altruism without collapsing into personal panic or compassion fatigue [2, 3]. Indeed, *T0310* directly equates the achievement of *Upekṣā* with the practice of open-handed generosity—calling the one who achieves *Upekṣā* a "Master of Giving" (*能捨主、是施主*) [2].

4. Misconception: *Upekṣā* is a static, rigid mental state that one "holds onto."

* Clarification: Holding onto equanimity turns "equanimity" into just another object of attachment. At its ultimate level, true liberation is "no taking and no abandoning" (*無取亦無捨*), transcending even the dichotomy of equal versus unequal (*不起平等不平等心*) [2]. True *Upekṣā* is completely natural, unforced, and unbound—a state where the mind rests naturally in reality, entirely free from clinging.


References (Canonical Sources)

1. **《雜阿含經》 (*Samyukta Āgama*, T0099): Sūtra passages on Supreme Cultivation of Faculties (卷21, chunk 5807), Six Constant Dwellings (卷22, chunks 5962–5966), Fruit of the Sphere of Nothingness (卷27, chunk 7715), Endurance during the Foot Splinter Event (卷47, chunks 18009, 18014), and Equanimity of Perception (卷48, chunks 18929–18931, 19032). 2. 《大寶積經》 (*Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra*, T0310):** Sūtra passages on Mind Like Earth/Water/Fire/Wind (卷111, chunk 19229), *捨煩惱捨* and *護自他捨* (卷96, chunk 15592), Timely vs. Untimely Equanimity (卷96 & 98, chunks 15592, 15795), No Taking and No Abandoning (卷111, chunks 15719, 17655), and Defining Equanimity as Generosity (卷111, chunk 19257). 3. **《大方等大集經》 (*Mahāsaṃnipāta Sūtra*, T0397):** Sūtra passages on Tathāgata's Wisdom Equanimity / Great Equanimity (卷11, chunks 11712–11713), Bodhisattva Equanimity and Non-Disputation (卷18, chunk 13783), and Viewing Insults "Like Wind Passing" / *捨忍清淨平等* (卷26, chunk 15137).

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

舍心(upekṣā-citta)是佛教修行中的核心心境,指超越苦乐、远离爱憎与执着,安住于平等、正念正智的无上心态。它并非消极的感官关闭或逃避,而是在积极面对六尘境界、世间八风乃至极端肉体痛苦时,内心保持不增不减、不苦不乐、自他俱护的超然与慈悲状态。

二、主要阐述

1. 六根对境与日常修行:在日常生活中,修行者于眼见色、耳闻声等六根接触六境时,不论面对顺境(可意)或逆境(不可意),皆能以正念正智调伏自心,达到「不苦、不乐,舍心住正念正智」的「六常行」境界。其最高境界为「欲修如来厌、不厌俱离舍心住正念正智」,彻底超越喜厌两极。 2. 面对痛苦与逆境的实践:舍心具有强大的堪忍力量。当肉体遭受极端痛苦(如佛陀「金鎗刺足」)时,凭借舍心与正智正念,能做到「堪忍自安,无退减想」。在身体受到割截等极端伤害时,修行者能发起「护自他舍」,不生瞋恨、不求报复,自他俱忍。 3. 平等无二与怨亲平等:舍心的核心特征是「心想常平等」。菩萨在怨亲、善恶、爱憎之间,心无高下与忧喜,其心如大地、水、火、风、空、法界般荷负一切,不增不减。对一切众生皆得平等心与等光明。 4. 舍心的修习果位与积极限制:修习舍心能契入「无所有入处」。然而,佛陀强调菩萨不可「唯修于舍」而置受苦众生于不顾,必须「于时非时乃应修舍」,若见有情受苦,终不应安住舍心而放弃利益众生。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

1. 《杂阿含经》(《雜阿含經》):强调「厌、不厌俱离舍心」、「六常行」 与「心想常平等」。并以「舍」字表达断除不善心境(如「舍不乐心」)及贪瞋痴等「诸尘」。 2. 《大宝积经》(《大寶積經》):将舍细分为「舍烦恼舍」与「护自他舍」。其中「护自他舍」又被称为「无诤极舍」、「灭自心舍」、「观自体舍」与「不害他舍」。此外,该经独特地将「成就舍心」直接定义为具体的布施行为,称菩萨为「能舍主、是施主」。 3. 《大方等大集经》(《大方等大集經》):区分如来之「智舍心(大舍)」与菩萨之「菩萨舍」。如来大舍包含「圣舍」、「毕竟舍」、「转梵轮舍」、「共大悲舍」、「为利众生舍」与「知对治舍」。菩萨舍则包含「菩萨舍于烦恼」、「菩萨舍护己他」与「舍时非时(无尽舍)」。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与四无量心:舍心为四无量心之一,其最胜果位导向「无所有入处」。在调伏众生时,有「非毕竟舍修集舍心」的实践。 2. 与智慧与大悲:如来的舍心是从智慧中修得,故称「智舍心」;且与大悲相应,称为「共大悲舍」。 3. 与忍辱:舍心与忍辱密切相关。面对肉体痛苦能「堪忍自安」;面对他人的骂辱、欺陵,菩萨应作「舍忍清净平等」之思惟,将违逆之事「皆悉如风」予以弃舍。 4. 与布施:在《大宝积经》中,舍心与外在的无吝施舍(施舍)相统一,以「能舍主」界定舍心。 5. 与无取无舍:在终极解脱层面,舍心超越了对平等相的执着,表现为「无取亦无舍」,甚至「不起平等不平等心」。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《杂阿含经》:「欲修如来厌、不厌俱离舍心住正念正智」;「不苦、不乐,舍心住正念正智」;「身生诸苦痛,而能行舍心,正智正念住,堪忍以自安」。 2. 《大宝积经》:「等心如地,荷负一切,于善于恶,无所增减」;「安住平等心,则不生憎爱」;「成就舍心者,为能舍主、是施主」。 3. 《大方等大集经》:如来大舍「无增无减、不高不下,不杂烦恼、不一不二……真实不虚」;「诸佛世尊不听菩萨于诸众生而行舍心」;「皆悉如风」。

By SutraAI-generated

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論「捨心」,散見於修根、常行、四無量、對治、忍苦諸脈絡,用語一貫作「捨心」,恆與「正念正智」(或倒作「正智正念」)並舉,構成「捨心住正念正智」之固定句式。

一、修諸根之極則。佛破外道波羅奢那「眼不見色、耳不聽聲」之修根說,另立賢聖法、律無上修根:緣眼、色生眼識,於可意、不可意、可不可意諸境,依次修厭離、不厭離、厭離不厭離、不厭離厭離,至第五句「厭、不厭俱離捨心住正念正智」,方為眼色無上修根,耳鼻舌身意法亦如是說。此處捨心非壓抑感官,乃超越厭與不厭之二邊,為修根之最高階段。

二、六常行。佛告諸比丘有「六常行」:眼見色,不苦、不樂,捨心住正念正智;耳聲、鼻香、舌味、身觸、意識法亦復如是。成就此六常行者「世間難得」,且「所應承事、恭敬、供養,則為世間無上福田」。此以「不苦不樂」為捨心所緣之受相,將捨心定位為六根日常觸境之恆常行持。

三、四無量中之捨心。佛於黃枕邑教比丘問外道:「修習捨心,為何所勝?」自答曰:「捨心修習多修習,無所有入處最勝。」 此以捨心與無所有入處相配,為四無量各有所勝之說中捨心之歸趣,亦標明此為佛說異於外道之要點。經文用「無所有入處」而非後世常見之「無所有處」,為本經特有之譯語形式。

四、對治妄語。佛為刀師氏聚落主說:「妄語對以捨心,不得為比。」 以捨心為對治妄語之法,與慈對殺、悲對偷盜、喜對邪婬並列,顯示捨心於止惡門中之對治功用。

五、佛身示範。佛於王舍城金婆羅山為金鎗刺足,「起身苦痛;能得捨心,正智正念,堪忍自安,無退減想」。山神天子偈嘆:「身生諸苦痛,而能行捨心,正智正念住,堪忍以自安,而無所退減。」 此處捨心用於極度身苦之中,強調「堪忍」「無退減」,為捨心在忍苦實踐中之具體展現。

綜觀本經,「捨心」一詞貫穿五處語境,皆不離「正念正智」之伴語;其義涵由修根之離二邊、六根觸境之不苦不樂、四無量之配無所有入處、對治妄語、至忍身苦而無退減,層層展開,構成《雜阿含經》對捨心之完整論述。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》論「捨心」兼具二義:一為平等離染、不起愛憎之心,一為布施捨離之心,二者皆以「平等」為骨幹。經中特立三種捨:「捨煩惱捨」、「護自他捨」、「時非時捨」,此三分名目為本經論捨之獨特架構。

就捨煩惱捨言,經以連串對境顯其相:於敬事心不高、於不敬事心無卑下,受利養不憍高、不得利養無紆欝,於持戒犯戒起平等覺,得名譽不悕樂、被毀謗無憂慼,遭譏訶志無貶退、受稱讚善住法性;復於怨親平等、於善作惡作無二、於有愛不愛情無所觀、於善聞惡聞不生執著、於善說惡說心無愛恚,於欲味過患平等稱量,於自身他眾生起平等信欲,於下中上諸眾生起平等照,於隱顯法起平等性,於諦非諦自體清淨。經明言能自然起勝對治,是名「捨煩惱捨」。

就護自他捨言,經謂菩薩縱被節節支解、割皮肉,內心「唯住於捨無所希望」,身語雖起變異俱能堪忍;又「不由眼相及以色相,乃至不由意相及以法相」心生損害而住於捨,以「無損無害」為護自他捨。於有恩無恩所平等方便,被他所損不加報,於自於他俱能忍受;經更以四目稱之:「無諍極捨、滅自心捨、觀自體捨、不害他捨」。

本經尤重「時非時」之辨:雖言菩薩於諸定事能捨,然「佛世尊非所聽許諸菩薩等唯修於捨」,蓋菩薩當日夜常念發起精進、求諸善法,「於時非時乃應修捨」。 偈頌亦承此意,謂縱經多百拘胝劫見有情受苦,「終無安住於捨心」,不捨利他;復言假使以贍部洲、三千佛世界珍寶相惠,或執利刀劍解我支節,我於彼眾生「平等利益心無二」,於毀罵難苦皆忍,能合暴惡有情為善友,此為聖賢聰叡之相。

偈頌復以六喻顯平等心:等心如地,荷負一切,於善於惡無所增減;如水,洗諸垢穢、除煩惱渴;如火,燒滅煩惱;如風,無處無依;如空,離見清淨、遍入一切而不隨魔;如法界,不增不減、常入平等。 又明「不為八風動,則不生憎愛」,謂堅被慈心鎧、安住平等心則不生憎愛,得利不自高、輕毀不生恨,諸想悉捨離、境界無所著,智者於苦樂「不動如虛空」,善觀察煩惱、我我所俱離。

於菩薩道位次,彌勒所問「畢竟成就八法」中,捨心與深心、行心、善知迴向方便心、大慈心、大悲心、善知方便、般若波羅蜜並列,為不退阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之要法。 而本經釋「成就捨心」,直以布施當之:謂菩薩「是能捨主、是施主」,施諸沙門、婆羅門、貧窮乞匃下賤人等衣食臥具、隨病湯藥所須之物。 施度之圓滿亦以三輪無別為說:「能於所施物,施者及受人,等無分別心,是則施圓滿。」

總而觀之,本經論捨心以「平等」貫穿境風、怨親、苦樂、施受諸面,既以八風不動、怨親無二驗其離染,復以三捨分其階次、以時非時節其用,更攝於八法而以布施釋之,用語上「捨煩惱捨」、「護自他捨」、「無諍極捨」等名,皆本經所特見。

大方等大集經T0397 · 大集部

《大方等大集經》論「捨心」,分如來之捨與菩薩之捨兩個層次,術語統一用「捨心」「捨」,未見以「平等心」或「無記」等替代,但屢以「平等」形容捨心之相狀。

一、如來捨心。經云「如來從智捨心無不知捨」,以修身、修戒、修心、修慧、斷癡為因,其捨「出於世間」,並立六種名目:聖捨、畢竟捨、轉梵輪捨、共大悲捨、為利眾生捨、知對治捨。其相以遮詮表之:「無增無減、不高不下,不雜煩惱、不一不二,不觀時節、無礙無對,不住不動、不隱不顯,真實不虛」,歸為「如來第二十業」。此處特色在於將捨心與大悲並舉(「共大悲捨」「為利眾生捨」),非單純無記或冷漠,而是智悲雙運之聖捨。

二、四無量心中之捨心。經於慈、悲、喜、捨四心並列時,特言「非畢竟捨修集捨心」,意謂菩薩所修捨心尚非如來之「畢竟捨」,仍屬修集階段,與上條如來之「畢竟捨」形成對照。此段語境為無言菩薩之功德,以慈心對眾生、悲心壞眾苦、喜心調不調、捨心為第四,四者各有對治對象。

三、菩薩捨之多層展開。經中廣說菩薩捨,至少含三義:(甲)捨煩惱——「放捨所愛斷於瞋恚,於親非親得平等心,持戒毀戒意無增減,作善作惡無有二相」,於愛非愛、善惡語、世法等皆「心無所著」「心不繫著」,總名「於世法等得菩薩捨」。(乙)捨護己他——「若被割截身體支節,心無瞋恨不求讎報,以得捨心故能捨二」,於六根對六塵「無有欲污」,「不傷不害是故名捨」;然而經中特別強調「諸佛世尊不聽菩薩於諸眾生而行捨心」,菩薩須「常修精進為利自他勤求善根」,不可對眾生起捨離之心。此為本經論捨心最獨特之處:捨是對己對煩惱之離執,而非對眾生之漠然。(丙)捨時非時——「非器眾生捨不引接,衰毀譏苦捨而不受,捨求聲聞成決定者」,又於六度修行中「行布施時捨修持戒,修持戒時捨於布施」等,一時專修一度而暫捨餘度,總名「菩薩修無盡捨」。

四、術語形式。本經始終用「捨心」「捨」,未用「行捨」「捨受」等阿毗達磨式術語;形容捨心之平等義時用「平等心」「無增減」「無二相」等描述語,而非另立名目。如來層面特立「聖捨」「畢竟捨」等六名,菩薩層面則立「菩薩捨」「無盡捨」,階位分明。

Related