Dharma · AI Companion

三要

临济宗机用施设,谓一玄门中各具三条要路,恒与三玄并称「三玄三要」。AI-generated

Type PracticeDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span outside the four-fold two-truths frameworkInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

「三要」 (sānyào, "three essentials") is an extremely core dharma-gate apparatus used by the Linji school of Tang-dynasty Chan (founded by Chan Master Linji Yixuan) in receiving students and deploying live dynamics (jīyòng, "living function"). In Chan circles it rarely appears alone, but is inseparable from 「三玄」 (sānxuán, "three mysteries"), together known as 「三玄三要」 (three mysteries and three essentials).

In one sentence, the most fundamental framework repeatedly emphasized by the Linji patriarchs is: 「一句語須具三玄門,一玄門須具三要」 ("one utterance must contain the three mystery gates; each mystery gate must contain the three essentials").

In the doctrinal tradition (the classical scriptures and theoretical systems of Buddhism), cultivation often proceeds by stages, with immense accumulations over asaṃkhyeya kalpas; but in the Chan school's ultimate discourse, the aim is direct, immediate penetration here and now. To prevent students from treating a master's utterance or gesture as dead knowledge or dogma, the Linji school established this extremely rigorous "structure of live function."

To thoroughly explain 「三要」, one must clarify the three progressive layers and boundaries of this structure:

1. Structure and Content: The Layering of 「一句」「三玄」「三要」

* 「一句」 (one utterance): Not a rigid written sentence, but the "living word" or "ultimate function" that flows from a single thought when the master confronts the occasion and receives the student—it may be a reply, a thunderous shout (Linji's one shout), a blow of the staff, or even a glance or a long, silent pause. * 「三玄」 (three mysteries): This refers to the three extremely profound and subtle functions and contemplations embedded within that single living utterance (later Chan circles often call them "mystery in substance, mystery in phrase, mystery within mystery / mystery in intention"). * 「三要」 (three essentials): This refers to the fact that within each layer of mystery, there are three indispensable essential paths/functions.

This constitutes a nested, multi-layered grid: what appears to be merely a simple utterance or a single shout-and-blow internally possesses the complete function of expedient and real (flexible response and direct pointing to substance) and of illumination and function (awareness-contemplation and great function). Chan Master Shimen once sternly pointed out that the words of all the sages of old are fully endowed with the three mysteries and three essentials—「他若不具三玄三要,總屬盲用」 ("if they lacked the three mysteries and three essentials, all would be blind use"). Without this profound functional support, the master's shouts and blows would degenerate into blind performance devoid of power and inspiration.

2. Multiple Presentations of the Three Essentials in Classical Verses

Classical literature (such as *Gǔzūsù yǔlù* [Records of the Ancient Worthies' Sayings] and *Réntiān yǎnmù* [The Eye of Humans and Gods]) preserves several sets of gāthās describing 「三要」. The Chan patriarchs absolutely refused to fix 「三要」 into a rigid definition, but used poetic verses to display its living, vibrant state:

* Fenyang Shanzhao's Verse (one of the most authoritative item-by-item presentations): * First Essential: 「豈話聖凡妙。擬議涉長途,擡眸七顛倒」. It transcends the dualistic distinction between ordinary beings and sages; the moment you stir a thought to speculate (擬議) or raise your eyes to search, you have already fallen into the topsy-turvy path. * Second Essential: 「峯頂敲犍召。神通自在來,多聞門外呌」. Though one strikes the gavel to summon the assembly on the solitary peak and displays vast supernormal powers, appearing utterly free, if one merely lingers in textual understanding (多聞), one remains locked outside the patriarchs' gate. * Third Essential: 「起倒令人笑。掌內握乾坤,千差都一照」. The seemingly ordinary movements of rising and lying down (起倒) may even make people laugh, yet in one's palm one holds heaven and earth; the myriad distinctions of the world are all illumined in a single mind of awareness. The verse concludes by pointing out 「棒喝要臨時」—emphasizing that it must be deployed at the living occasion. * Corroboration from Other Ancient Verses: * One verse says the first essential is 「根境俱忘絕朕兆」 (the opposition of subject and object completely dissolves, leaving not a trace), the second essential is 「鉤錐察辨呈巧妙」 (like lightning, swiftly and precisely discerning the student's root ailment), and the third is 「不用垂鈎并下釣」 (leaving no trace, yet causing the listener to spontaneously turn the light inward). * Another verse says the first essential is 「言中無作造」, the second is 「千聖入玄奧」, and the third is 「四句百非外,盡踏寒山道」.

3. The "Seal of the Three Essentials" and the Interweaving of the Linji Style

In revealing his famous 「three phrases」, Chan Master Linji Yixuan said: 「三要印開朱點窄,未容擬議主賓分」 ("when the seal of the three essentials opens, the vermilion dot is narrow; before one may deliberate, host and guest are already divided"). 「印開」 or 「點開」 is like pressing a seal down or dotting open the eye of heaven and earth with a vermilion brush. In the flash of lightning between the activation of the three essentials, even before the other party can stir a thought to deliberate (未容擬議), the dynamic and the balance of power between who is host (主, the one in command) and who is guest (賓, the one being guided) is already decided. This interweaves with the Linji school's 「four selections」 (奪人不奪境 etc.), 「four hosts and guests」, and even the 「Linji one shout」, forming an airtight dharma-net that severs the student's deluded thoughts.

4. Dahui Zonggao's Critique and "Ultimate Transcendence": From Name-and-Form to Self-Nature

At the highest level of the path of liberation, the Song-dynasty Chan Master Dahui Pujue (Dahui Zonggao) gave the most profound and most refreshing exposition of 「三要」:

* Sweeping away attachment to names and forms: If a person merely discusses "what are the three mysteries and three essentials, the four selections" glibly with their mouth, Master Dahui rebukes it as 「稱鎚上揑出汁,枯骨裏敲出髓」 ("squeezing juice from a scale weight, knocking marrow out of dry bones")—utterly meaningless lip-service, even like "seeing ghosts and spirits in broad daylight at the crossroads". When someone asked him the profound meaning of the three mysteries and three essentials, he said bluntly that this was 「屎窖傍邊更掘屎窖」 ("digging another latrine beside a latrine"). * Penetrating name-and-form to see true nature: But Master Dahui immediately added that if you can penetrate these dead names and forms (the latrine) and smell the true breath behind them, you will realize 「三世諸佛歷代祖師……盡在屎窖裏轉大法輪」 ("all Buddhas of the three times and patriarchs of all generations... turn the great dharma-wheel right inside the latrine"). Though the dharma-gate apparatus is a provisional name, awakening through it is supreme wondrous function. * The total relinquishment of dharma-gates as true liberation: In a verse, Dahui wrote: 「瞎驢一跳眾皆驚,正法那堪付與人。三要三玄俱喪盡,堂堂擺手出重城」 ("the blind donkey's one leap startles the crowd; how can the true dharma be entrusted to others? When the three essentials and three mysteries are utterly lost, one strides forth grandly, waving arms, out of the heavy city"). True ultimate awakening is precisely the moment when even these refined dharma-gates and tools—the 「three mysteries and three essentials」—are completely cast away and exhausted; only then can one stride out of the heavy city with grandeur and freedom, toward unimpeded liberation.


A Walkthrough in Daily Life

To avoid the ancient criticism of "showboating with the mouth" and "dying under the words," we can walk the functional logic of 「三玄三要」 through the most familiar scenarios of the contemporary workplace and communication.

Scenario: A High-Pressure Project Presentation After Deep Overtime (Communication and Live Function)

Suppose you are leading a core team facing an extremely complex business crisis. Every sentence of dialogue and every decision at this moment is actually testing your 「illumination and function」.

* Mis-mapping zone (where most people go wrong): * Mistaking 「三要」 for "three principles / three steps": Many people think the three essentials are: first, stay calm; second, make a plan; third, execute. This is completely wrong. The 「three essentials」 are not a linear process, but three layers of deep function and dimension simultaneously present within a single utterance/action in the present moment. * First dimension (corresponding to the first essential: 「豈話聖凡妙」「根境俱忘絕朕兆」)— the ground color of completely transcending dualistic anxiety * When the boss slams the table demanding accountability in the meeting room, or the system crash looms as a disaster, if you sink into the dualistic opposition of "Am I going to be fired? (ordinary)" and "I must appear as a perfect savior (sage)," the moment you start thinking about these (擬議), you immediately "enter the long road" and fall into "sevenfold topsy-turvy". * The true live function of the first essential is the present thought's 「無作造」 and 「絕朕兆」: deep inside you there is a substance utterly untangled by emotion and gain-loss; the opposition of subject and object is cut off in that instant. Only on this ground color will you not panic. * Second dimension (corresponding to the second essential: 「峯頂敲犍召」「鉤錐察辨呈巧妙」)— extremely sharp and precise insight and intervention in the present * With the unshakable ground color, the first sentence you speak at that juncture is not emotional venting but "hook and awl discernment". Like the sharpest blade, you pierce through the core need behind the other person's emotion in one glance, and with one highly penetrating sentence, directly break the deadlock and awaken the bewildered subordinate. * This is called "supernormal powers come freely"—your response is extremely skillful and precise, not mechanically reciting from a rigid PPT report (that would be "the learned one calling outside the gate"). * Third dimension (corresponding to the third essential: 「掌內握乾坤,千差都一照」「不用垂鈎并下釣」)— overall command with the big picture in hand and self-reflective awareness * While handling the specific problem, your awareness completely envelops the entire scene (holding heaven and earth in the palm, illumining all distinctions in one light). You need not deliberately set traps or manipulate others (no need to cast hook or let down line); your own composure, wisdom, and decisive action naturally shift the energy of the whole room, waking everyone from confusion and turning the light back to see the facts clearly.

Walkthrough summary: Chan says 「一喝中具三玄三要」 ("within one shout the three mysteries and three essentials are fully present"). In life, a person of true wisdom—in a single decision or a single response in the present moment—possesses both the stability of not falling into gain and loss (first essential), the penetrating power that strikes the vital point (second essential), and the awareness that embraces the whole situation (third essential). These three are fused as one; this is the living, vibrant 「三要」.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary life is a world that easily traps people in "conceptualization" and "mechanization." Every day we are wrapped in countless KPIs, methodologies, and communication frameworks (OKR, NVC, etc.). The wisdom of 「三玄三要」 has a shockingly detoxifying effect today:

1. Breaking "dead phrases" and mechanical dogma (beware of algorithmic and formulaic living) Contemporary people easily "die" inside formulas—romance by emotional-intelligence formulas, work by presentation templates. The Linji school emphasizes the difference between 「盲用」 (blind use) and 「活用」 (living use): formulas without inner awareness and real power are all dead phrases and blind use. The three mysteries and three essentials remind us that any language or action only has life-force when it arises from the awareness of self-nature and genuine recognition of the present moment. 2. Building "illumination and function simultaneously" as high-dimensional psychological resilience Contemporary psychology (such as ACT, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) and AI large models can serve as a contrast: * *AI and algorithms* can process vast amounts of logic and intellectual understanding, similar to what Chan calls 「多聞」 (much learning) and the "wind of intellectual interpretation". But algorithms lack true 「覺照」 (awareness) and the "mystery in substance." * *Psychology's limitation*: Contemporary psychology excels at analyzing psychological mechanisms, but often, while "solving one problem," it creates "anxiety about the problem." The 「three essentials」 offer a highest-dimensional psychological resilience of "not falling into ordinary/sage or gain/loss on one side, while responding with extreme acuity to the myriad things on the other" (illumining all distinctions in one light). 3. The final letting-go: not being kidnapped by tools and cognition Dahui Zonggao's sweeping away of the three essentials and three mysteries (「三要三玄俱喪盡」) is the ultimate antidote for contemporary spiritual anxiety. We have learned too many body-mind regulation methods, meditation techniques, and success doctrines; in the end, these techniques themselves become new shackles. Chan tells us: all tools and theories are merely boats for crossing the river (sometimes even like a latrine); when you have truly penetrated the mind-nature, even the thought "I am cultivating the mind" or "I am using the three essentials" must be completely cast away, and only then can you "stride forth grandly out of the heavy city" and attain complete freedom.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

* Misreading one: treating 「三要」 as three independent rules detached from speech * *Clarification*: Classical literature clearly states that the 「three essentials」 are not three separate items established apart from utterances, but 「寓于每一玄門之中」 ("dwell within each mystery gate")—one utterance contains the three mysteries, one mystery contains the three essentials. It is a structure of inexhaustible layering and function, and absolutely cannot be dismantled into three isolated dogmas. * Misreading two: thinking that memorizing Fenyang's or the ancients' "verse on the three essentials" means understanding them * *Clarification*: *Réntiān yǎnmù* and *Gǔzūsù yǔlù* preserve several completely different sets of verses on the three essentials, which precisely proves that the patriarchs deliberately refused to give 「三要」 a fixed, rigid definition. The Linji style emphasizes "attaining the meaning and forgetting the words" and "the shout and blow must come at the living occasion". If one lingers in mechanically dissecting and applying the written verses, one falls exactly into what Master Dahui called "showboating with the mouth" and "knocking marrow out of dry bones". * Misreading three: thinking that since Chan requires "the three essentials and three mysteries utterly lost," these concepts are completely useless and can be wholly negated * *Clarification*: This is a classic fall into the view of emptiness. Though Master Dahui fiercely denounced names and forms as a latrine, he immediately added: "if you can know some breath within the latrine, you will realize that the Buddhas of the three times... all turn the great dharma-wheel within the latrine". The dharma-gate apparatus (the three essentials) is the patriarchs' painstaking ferry for guiding students. Before crossing the river one cannot lack the boat; after crossing, one cannot carry the boat on land. Understanding the function of the 「three essentials」 is an important process in cultivation; only by "experiencing it and ultimately transcending it" is the path of liberation complete.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

「三要」是临济宗宗旨机用中的核心施设,指每一玄门之中所各具的三条要路,恒与「三玄」并称,合为「三玄三要」。其基本纲格为「一句语须具三玄门,一玄门须具三要」,亦即单一语句即蕴含三重玄门,每一玄门又各具三要,方为「从上诸圣」之正用,否则「总属盲用」。三要并非脱离语句而另立的三条义目,而是寓于每一玄门之中,并与「有权有实、有照有用」相连而说。

二、主要阐述

纲格结构:一句、三玄、三要之层递

诸家反复揭示同一原则:临济义玄云「一句语须具三玄门,一玄门须具三要,有权有用」;石门云「一句语中须具三玄,一玄门中须具三要,从上诸圣总具三玄三要。他若不具三玄三要,总属盲用」,又见「一句语中须具三玄,一玄中须具三要」;汾阳善昭亦云「一句语须具三玄门,一玄门须具三要」。《人天眼目》以临济之语确立同一格式:「一语须具三玄门,一玄门须具三要」,并与「有权有实、有照有用」相连。《大慧普觉禅师语录》示众云「一句中具三玄门,一玄门有三要路」,以「要路」释「要」,表明单一言句即蕴含三重玄门,而每一玄门之中又各自具备三条要路。

三要之逐项颂出

汾阳善昭以颂文逐一明示三要之旨:「第一要,岂话圣凡妙。拟议涉长途,抬眸七颠倒」,谓第一要非关圣凡之妙,拟议即落歧途;「第二要,峰顶敲犍召。神通自在来,多闻门外呌」,谓第二要于峰顶击犍召众,虽神通自在,仍有多闻门外之机;「第三要,起倒令人笑。掌内握乾坤,千差都一照」,谓第三要起倒令人失笑,掌中握乾坤而千差归于一照;末以「棒喝要临时」回应临济家风。《人天眼目》另存多套三要颂语:一组以汾阳答第一要为「言中无作造」,第二要为「千圣入玄奥」,第三要为「四句百非外,尽踏寒山道」,同段并有「最好精麁照」「闪烁乾坤光晃耀」「夹路青松老」诸语;又一组说第一要「根境俱忘绝朕兆」,以山崩海竭、荡尽寒灰形容其绝迹,第二要「钩锥察辨呈巧妙」,呈「纵去夺来掣电机」之迅疾辨察,第三要「不用垂钩并下钓」,于临机一曲使闻者「尽教来反照」;另有一组措辞与《古尊宿语录》所载汾阳颂相近而小异,第一要作「岂话圣贤妙」,第二要言峰顶敲楗召、神通自在来而反衬「多闻门外叫」,第三要言「掌内握乾坤,千差都一照」,并以「棒喝要临时」点出须于当机处发用。全书保存多套颂语,而未将三要固定成单一名相释义。

「三要印开」与主宾之机

临济上堂揭示三句之首句:「如何是第一句?师云:三要印开朱点窄,未容拟议主宾分」。「三要印开」之语后亦见于石门颂「三要点开天地眼,一曲无私豁古今」,皆以「印开」「点开」表三要之启用,配合主宾、照用同时之机。

大慧之批判与超越

《大慧普觉禅师语录》对「三要」之论述兼具揭示机用与扫除名相执着两面。一方面确认「一句中具三玄门,一玄门有三要路」之层递;另一方面严斥徒事口头谈论者,谓若只在口头「更说甚么三要三玄四种料拣」,便如「称锤上揑出汁,枯骨里敲出髓」,纯属「一味卖弄口嘴」,甚至斥之「大似青天白日十字街头见神见鬼」。有僧问「向上向下三要三玄银盌里盛雪北斗里藏身意旨如何」,大慧直言此「岂不是屎窖傍边更掘屎窖」;然随即指出,若「于屎窖中知些气息,方知三世诸佛历代祖师天下老和尚古往今来一切知识,尽在屎窖里转大法轮」。其偈颂又云「瞎驴一跳众皆惊,正法那堪付与人。三要三玄俱丧尽,堂堂摆手出重城」,谓正法于「三要三玄」一切施设皆丧尽时方得堂堂展现。大慧自身接引学人则称「豁开三要三玄路,坐断须弥第一峰」,示不拘前人门庭、直截开显之禅风。

三要与一喝、宗风之总摄

《人天眼目》于临济宗风总述中,将三要与三玄、四宾主、四料拣、金刚王宝剑、踞地师子、探竿影草及一喝并列,明言「一喝中」具三玄三要,一喝自有照有用、宾主等作用,故三要亦被置于喝中卷舒、擒纵、杀活自在之整体机用而说。书中又总括「三玄三要事难分,得意忘言道易亲」,谓一句足以统该万象,三要虽分列为三,于实际语句与机用中并非截然割裂;并记当时学者对其旨趣有所隔膜,足见其旨不以平实见解或传受文字即可尽。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

本条所涉皆为禅宗语录与宗门撰述,非经藏异译,然各部类用语仍有可辨之异:

- 合称语序之异:《古尊宿语录》与《人天眼目》多作「三玄三要」;《大慧普觉禅师语录》则多用倒序「三要三玄」,并有「三要三玄路」之称。 - 「要」之释称:《大慧普觉禅师语录》别出「三要路」一词,以「要路」释「要」;余二书径用「三要」。 - 逐项颂文之异:汾阳颂第一要,《古尊宿语录》作「岂话圣凡妙」,《人天眼目》所录同组则作「岂话圣贤妙」;第二要《古尊宿语录》作「峰顶敲犍召」,《人天眼目》作「峰顶敲楗召」,「犍」「楗」用字不一。《人天眼目》又另存「言中无作造/千圣入玄奥/四句百非外,尽踏寒山道」及「根境俱忘绝朕兆/钩锥察辨呈巧妙/不用垂钩并下钓」等不同措辞之颂组,与《古尊宿语录》所载汾阳颂互异,显示其为多源传录之并存,而非定于一尊之释义。 - 启用语之异:临济作「三要印开朱点窄」,石门颂则作「三要点开天地眼」,「印开」与「点开」措辞各异而皆表三要之启用。

四、与相关概念的关系

- 三玄:三要与三玄互具,「一句具三玄,一玄具三要」为其纲格,二者恒并称「三玄三要」。 - 三句:三要与第一句、第二句、第三句之机用配合展开,「三要印开」即于第一句下揭示。 - 四照用、四料拣:三要与「夺人不夺境、夺境不夺人、人境俱夺、人境俱不夺」之四照用交织;《大慧普觉禅师语录》又将三要三玄与「四种料拣」并论。 - 四宾主、主宾:「三要印开朱点窄,未容拟议主宾分」,三要启用之际即分主宾;《人天眼目》以三要与四宾主并列于临济宗风。 - 棒喝、一喝:汾阳末颂「棒喝要临时」点出三要须于当机处发用;《人天眼目》明言「一喝中」具三玄三要。

五、代表性原文引用

- 「一句语须具三玄门,一玄门须具三要,有权有用。」(《古尊宿语录》) - 「从上诸圣总具三玄三要。他若不具三玄三要,总属盲用。」(《古尊宿语录》石门语) - 「第一要,岂话圣凡妙。拟议涉长途,抬眸七颠倒……第三要,起倒令人笑。掌内握乾坤,千差都一照。」(《古尊宿语录》汾阳颂) - 「三要印开朱点窄,未容拟议主宾分。」(《古尊宿语录》临济语) - 「一句中具三玄门,一玄门有三要路。」(《大慧普觉禅师语录》) - 「三要三玄俱丧尽,堂堂摆手出重城。」(《大慧普觉禅师语录》) - 「豁开三要三玄路,坐断须弥第一峰。」(《大慧普觉禅师语录》) - 「三玄三要事难分,得意忘言道易亲。」(《人天眼目》)

By SutraAI-generated

大慧普覺禪師語錄T1998A · 諸宗部

《大慧普覺禪師語錄》中對「三要」這一禪門宗旨機用的論述,多與「三玄」並提,合稱為「三要三玄」或「三玄三要」,有時亦與「四種料揀」等臨濟宗核心施設並論。本經對「三要」的論述呈現出既揭示其機用結構,又極力掃除對其名相執著的獨特視角。

首先,在機用結構上,本經指出「三要」與「三玄」及「一句」之間的層遞關係。經中示眾云:「一句中具三玄門,一玄門有三要路」。這表明在禪宗的言句施設中,單一言句即蘊含著三重玄門,而每一玄門之中又各自具備三條要路,展現了臨濟宗法門機用的嚴密與深邃。

其次,大慧禪師對徒事口頭談論「三要」的禪客進行了嚴厲的批判。經中指出,若只是在口頭上「更說甚麼三要三玄四種料揀」,便如同「稱鎚上揑出汁,枯骨裏敲出髓」,完全沒有真實的蘊藉,純屬「一味賣弄口嘴」。大慧禪師甚至直斥這種對名相的執著「大似青天白日十字街頭見神見鬼」。當有僧人問及「向上向下三要三玄銀盌裏盛雪北斗裏藏身意旨如何」時,大慧禪師亦直言這「豈不是屎窖傍邊更掘屎窖」。然而,禪師隨即指出,雖然這些名相如屎窖,但「若於屎窖中知些氣息,方知三世諸佛歷代祖師天下老和尚古往今來一切知識,盡在屎窖裏轉大法輪」。這說明「三要三玄」雖是文字名相(屎窖),但若能透過名相契會其真實機用(知些氣息),便能體會諸佛祖師轉大法輪的妙用。

再者,本經展現了超越「三要」等名相、回歸自性的解脫境界。經中偈頌云:「瞎驢一跳眾皆驚,正法那堪付與人。三要三玄俱喪盡,堂堂擺手出重城」。這表明真正的正法與解脫,是在「三要三玄」等一切施設皆「俱喪盡」的當下,方能堂堂展現。

最後,大慧禪師自身在接引學人時,亦靈活運用此概念。他對比前人(如真淨和尚)的作法,宣稱自己(杲上座)則是「豁開三要三玄路,坐斷須彌第一峯」,顯示出其不拘泥於前人門庭,而是以大機大用直接開顯三要三玄之路,截斷學人妄想的禪風。

在術語形式上,本經除了使用「三要」外,還使用了「三要路」、「三要三玄路」等詞,並常與「三玄門」、「三玄」及「四種料揀」並提。

人天眼目T2006 · 諸宗部

《人天眼目》論「三要」,首先以臨濟之語確立其基本格式:「一語須具三玄門,一玄門須具三要」,並與「有權有實、有照有用」相連。由此可見,三要不是脫離語句而另立的三條義目,而是寓於每一玄門之中;全書又稱「一句中須具三玄門,一玄門須具三要」,或說「一玄中具三要」,所用術語即「三要」,且常與「三玄」合稱「三玄三要」。

書中以問答標舉第一、第二、第三要。汾陽答第一要為「言中無作造」,第二要為「千聖入玄奧」,第三要為「四句百非外,盡踏寒山道」;同段另有相應之語:「最好精麁照」、「閃爍乾坤光晃耀」、「夾路青松老」。這些表述不以抽象釋義逐條界定,而以宗門語句顯示三要之機用、照鑒與離卻言詮分別之旨。

另一組頌文說第一要是「根境俱忘絕朕兆」,並以山崩海竭、蕩盡寒灰形容其絕跡;第二要著重「鉤錐察辨呈巧妙」,呈現「縱去奪來掣電機」的迅疾辨察;第三要則說「不用垂鈎并下釣」,但於臨機一曲之中,使聞者「盡教來反照」。末後總括「三玄三要事難分,得意忘言道易親」,又言一句明明足以統該萬象,顯示三要雖分列為三,在實際語句與機用中並非截然割裂。

書中又錄一組不同措辭:第一要以「豈話聖賢妙」警示擬議即涉長途;第二要以峯頂敲楗召而神通自在來,反襯「多聞門外叫」;第三要說「掌內握乾坤,千差都一照」,並以「棒喝要臨時」點出須於當機處發用。此組偈頌與前組用語各異,顯示全書保存多套三要頌語,而未將三要固定成單一名相釋義。

在臨濟宗風的總述中,三要與三玄、四賓主、四料揀、金剛王寶劍、踞地師子、探竿影草及一喝並列。書中明言「一喝中」具三玄三要,又說一喝自有照有用、賓主等作用,故三要亦被置於喝中卷舒、擒縱、殺活自在的整體機用來說;同時又指出「三玄三要事難分」,並記當時學者對其旨趣有所隔膜,足見其旨不以平實見解或傳受文字即可盡。

古尊宿語錄X1315 · 禪宗語錄部

《古尊宿語錄》論「三要」,主要見於臨濟義玄與汾陽善昭的機用開示中,其核心表述為「三要」與「三玄」對應、互具的結構關係。

第一,「三要」與「三玄」的配對結構。多處上堂法語反覆揭示此一原則:臨濟云「一句語須具三玄門,一玄門須具三要,有權有用」;石門云「一句語中須具三玄,一玄門中須具三要,從上諸聖總具三玄三要。他若不具三玄三要,總屬盲用」;又見「一句語中須具三玄,一玄中須具三要」;汾陽善昭亦云「一句語須具三玄門,一玄門須具三要」。此即此經獨特之術語形式:「三要」與「三玄」並稱,互為能所,一句具三玄,一玄具三要,方為「從上諸聖」之正用,否則「總屬盲用」。

第二,「三要」的具體頌出。汾陽善昭以頌文逐一明示三要之旨:「第一要,豈話聖凡妙。擬議涉長途,擡眸七顛倒」,意謂第一要非關聖凡之妙,擬議即落入歧途;「第二要,峯頂敲犍召。神通自在來,多聞門外呌」,第二要在峰頂擊犍召眾,雖神通自在,仍有多聞門外之機;「第三要,起倒令人笑。掌內握乾坤,千差都一照」,第三要之起倒令人失笑,掌中握乾坤而千差歸於一照。末頌「棒喝要臨時」回應臨濟家風。

第三,「三要印開」與主賓之機。臨濟上堂揭示三句之首句:「如何是第一句?師云:三要印開朱點窄,未容擬議主賓分」。「三要印開」之語後亦見於石門頌「三要點開天地眼,一曲無私豁古今」,皆以「印開」「點開」表三要之啟用,配合主賓、照用同時之機。

第四,三要與三句、四照用之對應。「三要」與「三玄」對應之時,亦配合「三句」(第一句、第二句、第三句)之機用展開;同時與「有時奪人不奪境,有時奪境不奪人,有時人境俱奪,有時人境俱不奪」之四照用交織,構成臨濟宗旨機用之完整面目。

綜上,此經論「三要」之術語形式為「三玄三要」並稱,以「一句具三玄,一玄具三要」為綱格;其獨特側面在於以汾陽頌文將三要逐項頌出,並以「三要印開」「三要點開」之語揭示其於主賓機用中之啟用功能。此經所用術語,除「三要」「三玄」「三句」「照用」「主賓」「棒喝」等禪門通語外,未見與其他經不同的譯名。

Related