Dharma · AI Companion

自性空

svabhāva-śūnyatā

一切法的自性本来空寂AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty AdvancedTruth-level span II · emptiness ⇢ IV · beyond wordsInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

初立第二重:缘生故无自性,第二重核心命题;中途于第三重转为「空不坏假名」的空有不二读法;究竟第四重〔般若/三论:空亦复空、毕竟空不可说,收于言忘虑绝〕。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What Is "Emptiness of Self-Nature" (自性空, *Svabhāva-śūnyatā*) Saying?

In the Buddhist tradition, Emptiness of Self-Nature (*svabhāva-śūnyatā*) is not a gloomy claim that reality is an illusion or that nothing matters. Rather, it is the foundational insight revealing how reality actually functions.

To grasp this concept accurately, we must first dissect its core technical terms according to classical canonical standards:

1. **Self-Nature (*Svabhāva* / 自性)**: In Buddhist philosophy, *svabhāva* denotes an entity or property that possesses three characteristics: * Independent: Existing entirely on its own, without relying on external causes or conditions. * Unchanging: Permanent, immutable, and non-arising/non-ceasing. * Self-Contained: Having an isolated, intrinsic core or essence (*自体*) that belongs solely to itself.

2. **Emptiness (*Śūnyatā* / 空)**: Emptiness does not mean "nothingness" (*無*) or physical absence. It means that because all phenomena are dependent upon causes and conditions (*pratītyasamutpāda* / 因緣和合), they are entirely **devoid (*śūnya*) of any independent, permanent self-nature**.

In classical texts like the *Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra* (*摩訶般若波羅蜜經*) and the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* (*大寶積經*), this truth is systematically articulated through precise, multi-layered definitions:

* **Nature-Emptiness (*性空*) & Empty of Conditioned Phenomena (*有法空*)**: As stated in the *Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra*: *"All natures of phenomena, whether conditioned or unconditioned... are empty in their very nature, being neither eternal nor destroyed. Why? Because that is their fundamental reality."* When phenomena come together through causes and conditions, their apparent intrinsic marks (*自性相*) are also inherently empty (*非常非滅*)—a reality described as "empty of conditioned phenomena" (*有法空*). * Originating from Conditions, Lack Self-Nature: The *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* summarizes this in a famous stanza: *"All phenomena arise together through a multitude of conditions; because they arise from a multitude of conditions, self-nature is non-existent"*.

The Anatomy of Universal Emptiness

Classical texts leave no corner of experience unexamined. They apply *svabhāva-śūnyatā* across four distinct domains:

``` ┌── 1. Psychophysical Self & World (Five Aggregates, Dhatu, Ayatana) ├── 2. Practice, Merits, & Higher Attainments (Paramitas, Bodhi, Nirvāṇa) ALL PHENOMENA ARE EMPTY ──┼── 3. Language, Concepts, & Perception (Words, Subject vs. Object) └── 4. Karma, Cause/Effect, & Rebirth (Action, Agent, Receiver) ```

1. The Psychophysical Being and the External World: The Five Aggregates (*五陰/五蘊*—Form, Sensation, Perception, Volitional Formations, Consciousness), the 12 Sense Bases (*處*), and the 18 Elements (*界*) are all "unborn and empty of self-nature" (*不生法,自性空*). They undergo continuous flux and decay (*陰生必敗壞,無事無自性*). 2. Spiritual Practice, Merits, and Ultimate Attainments: Crucially, Mahāyāna texts emphasize that emptiness applies not only to worldly, mundane things (*世間法*), but also to transcendent, spiritual things (*出世間法*). The Six Perfections (*六波羅蜜*), spiritual powers (*神通*), virtues, the fruit of Unsurpassed Awakening (*阿耨多羅三藐三菩提*), and even the Buddha and Arahats are fundamentally empty of self-nature (*一切諸法自性空故*). 3. Language, Words, and Dualistic Subject-Object Dynamics: Language and symbols are conventional constructs (*得以假名字,而實無所說*). Furthermore, the observing wisdom (*能觀之智*) and the observed domain (*所觀之境*) are mutually dependent and intrinsically empty (*體性空*), dissolving the duality between observer and observed. 4. Karma, Cause and Effect, and Rebirth: Using the analogy of a dream, the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* clarifies that while cause and effect function infallibly on the conventional level (*世俗諦*), on the ultimate level (*勝義諦/體性空*), *"there is no real actor who creates karma, nor any real receiver who experiences the fruit"* (*無有作業者、無有受報者*). Birth, death, consciousness, and Nirvāṇa are all inherently free from fixed essences (*自性離*).


A Walkthrough in Contemporary Life

To understand how *svabhāva-śūnyatā* maps onto modern daily life, let us examine a familiar scenario: receiving a critical, accusatory message on a work chat app (like Slack or Teams) while commuting.

``` [Work Chat Notification] ➔ [Sensation: Heart Racing] ➔ [Perception: "They Think I'm Incompetent!"] ➔ [Volition: Draft Angry Reply] ➔ [Fixated Ego: "I Am Being Attacked!"] ```

Here is a step-by-step audit of how we construct a false sense of "self-nature" (*自性*), followed by how the classical Buddhist definition deconstructs it:

Step 1: Mapping the Psychophysical Experience (The Five Aggregates)

* **Form (*色*)**: The glowing smartphone screen, light waves entering the retina, the physical heart beating rapidly, adrenaline pumping through blood vessels. * **Sensation (*受*)**: An immediate, visceral feeling of unpleasantness (*苦受*) triggered by the text. * **Perception (*想*)**: Rapidly cognitive labeling and recognition (*取相識別*)—interpreting the text as "an unfair attack on my professional competence." * **Volitional Formations (*行*)**: The surge of mental impulse, intention (*思*), and ego-defensiveness driving a urge to type a furious counter-attack. * **Consciousness (*識*)**: The underlying awareness (*了別*) coordinating these physical and psychological inputs into a coherent experience.

Step 2: The Fallacy of Assigning "Self-Nature" (*自性*)

* Where the mind missteps: We collapse these fleeting, interconnected processes into solid, fixed entities. We think: *"My boss is fundamentally hostile (*固有的惡意*),"* *"This job is a toxic nightmare (*固有的痛苦*),"* and *"My self-worth has been permanently damaged (*固有的受害者個體*)."* We treat the anger, the boss, the text, and our identity as self-sustained objects possessing fixed intrinsic natures (*自性相*).

Step 3: Deconstructing through *Svabhāva-Śūnyatā*

* Deconstructing the Event: Where is the "hostile text"? It depends on code, servers, screen pixels, your language comprehension, and your boss's stress level. It has no independent, isolated existence (*眾緣和合故,自性無所有*). * Deconstructing the Self: Where is the "victim"? Is it the screen (*色*)? The unpleasant spike (*受*)? The interpretation (*想*)? The urge to reply (*行*)? None of these individual components is "you," nor do they contain a solid self-entity. They arise from past conditioning and present triggers, then instantly dissolve. * Deconstructing the Cause & Effect: Karma functions on a conventional level (typing a rude reply will cause real work friction). Yet, in the ultimate sense, there is no monolithic "attacker" and no fixed "victim" (*無有作業者、無有受報者*). Recognizing this frees you from entering an endless cycle of reactive hostility.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Modern human suffering is heavily driven by essentialism—the subconscious belief that our identities, feelings, careers, and relationships possess unchangeable "self-natures."

1. The Trap of Digital Identity and Algorithms

In an era dominated by social media algorithms and personal branding, we are constantly encouraged to solidify our "self" into a static product or profile. When our online image is praised or attacked, we suffer because we treat our identity as a fixed entity. *Svabhāva-śūnyatā* acts as a cognitive release valve, reminding us that digital identities, metrics, and reputations are mere web-woven symbols—empty of intrinsic substance (*文字語業自性空*).

2. The Illusion of Algorithmic & Neurological Determinism

Modern technology and neuroscience often frame humans as deterministic systems: *"You are just a bundle of dopamine loops, genetic traits, or algorithmic predictions."* While neuroscience correctly rejects an immortal soul (aligning partially with the denial of an independent *ātman*), it can inadvertently breed fatalism—making people feel permanently trapped by their diagnoses, mental traits, or past trauma.

*Svabhāva-śūnyatā* provides a vital philosophical distinction here. It clarifies that mental states are not hardcoded, unchangeable essences. Because emotional states and mental habits are conditioned (*因緣和合*), they possess no intrinsic permanency (*非常非滅*). They are open, adaptable, and inherently capable of transformation.

*Note on Scientific Comparisons: While cognitive science and modern systems theory observe interdependency and fluid mental states, science relies on empirical, quantitative measurement of physical phenomena. Emptiness in Mahāyāna philosophy is an experiential, soteriological insight meant to liberate the mind from all conceptual clinging, extending beyond empirical physics.*


Common Misinterpretations and Clarifications

Misinterpretation 1: "If everything is empty of self-nature, then nothing exists, and morality/karma doesn't matter."

* Clarification: This is the dangerous error of Nihilism (*斷滅見*). Emptiness does not mean non-existence (*無*); it means lack of independent existence (*無自性*). * As Nagarjuna and the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra* clarify, cause and effect (*karma*) operate *precisely because* things are empty of fixed self-nature. If a bad action had a fixed, unchangeable self-nature, it could never be transformed or purified. Because actions and consequences are dependent on conditions (*體性空*), our choices have genuine conventional reality and power.

Misinterpretation 2: "If spiritual practice and enlightenment are also empty, why bother practicing?"

* Clarification: The classical texts explicitly address this paradox. The *Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra* notes that a Bodhisattva practices the Six Perfections (*六波羅蜜*) and helps sentient beings precisely *because* beings suffer from the delusion of fixed self-natures (*世間心皆顛倒*). * Knowing that enlightenment and practice are empty of inherent existence (*自性空*) prevents the practitioner from transforming spiritual practice into a new form of spiritual egoism. The Buddha's skillful means (*漚和拘舍羅 / Upāya*) allow one to practice diligently while remaining completely unattached to the practice, the practitioner, and the result.

Misinterpretation 3: "Emptiness means pushing away thoughts and making the mind completely blank."

* Clarification: Emptiness is not a state of sensory deprivation or mental blankness; it is the true nature of all experience as it is happening right now. You do not need to destroy thoughts to make them empty; thoughts are *already* empty of self-nature as they arise and pass away (*性自爾*). Understanding *svabhāva-śūnyatā* means seeing through the false solidity of thoughts without needing to suppress them.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在佛学经典中,“自性空”(svabhāva-śūnyatā)是阐释一切事物本性空寂的核心概念。根据《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》,自性空主要通过“性空”与“有法空”来定义。其中,“性空”是指:“一切法性,若有為法性若無為法性……是性性空,非常非滅故。何以故?性自爾。是名性空。” 而“有法空”则指:“有法名諸法和合中有自性相,是有法空,非常非滅故。何以故?性自爾。是名有法空。” 经中进一步指出,“諸法和合生無自性”,即一切事物皆是依凭因缘和合而生起,并没有独立、恒常、不变的自性。

在《大寶積經》中,这一要义得到了高度契合的阐述。经文指出,一切因缘和合之法皆无自性,事物并无真实的自体,如经云:“諸法以眾緣,和合而共起,眾緣和合故,自性無所有”。这种因缘所作之法,虽然在世俗谛的层面上会有因缘相续的显现,但佛陀悉知其本质上是“無自性”的。

二、主要阐述

1. 众生身心与器世界的自性空寂 在对众生身心与客观世界的剖析中,两经均指出其自性空的本质。色、受、想、行、识等五阴(或五蕴)皆是“不生法,自性空”,“五蔭空,是名法法相空”。无论是三界、诸蕴、界、处,皆是“自性本來空,無相無有體”,“陰生必敗壞,無事無自性”。自性空这一真理,实际上“超過蘊界處”。

2. 修行功德、神通与佛果的自性空寂 不仅世俗法空,出世间法及修行功德同样是自性空的。菩萨在修行般若波罗蜜时,虽能获得如意通、天耳通、他心通、宿命通、天眼通等各种神通,但皆不生执着,因为“神通事及己身皆不可得,自性空故、自性離故、自性無生故”。修行所依的六波罗蜜本身也是“自性空、虛誑如野馬”;布施、持戒的果报以及所瞋的对象皆是“自性空”,诸善法亦是“自性空故”。乃至无上菩提也是“不生法,自性空”;在深般若波罗蜜中,无色乃至无阿耨多罗三藐三菩提,亦无佛与声闻,因为“一切諸法自性空故”。

3. 文字、语言与能所双亡的自性空寂 《大寶積經》深入论述了文字、语言与言说的自性空。文字与语业并非如实,其本性是平等的,皆无真实开示,即“以於一切文字語業自性空故,文字語業亦復皆空”。即便菩萨演说佛法,其“說偈文字皆自性空”,佛陀与菩萨只是“得以假名字,而實無所說”。此外,能观察的智慧与所观察的境界“自性常遠離”,且导师能知之智其“體性空”,体现了能所双亡的空寂。

4. 业报因果与生死涅槃的体性空寂 在因果与生死问题上,《大寶積經》通过梦境的譬喻,阐明了业报因果与生死涅槃的“體性空”(即自性离)。虽然在世俗谛中作业果报不失坏,但实际上“無有作業者、無有受報者”。这是因为“自性離故”,包括前后识、缘、业、死、初识、受生、世间、涅槃、起、坏等,其“體性皆空”。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同部类的经典及不同译本中,对于“自性空”这一概念的用词和表述存在细微而重要的差异:

1. 核心术语的侧重: * 《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》(般若部)主要使用“自性空”、“性空”、“有法空”、“無自性”等术语来阐发空义。 * 《大寶積經》(寶積部,唐菩提流志译)则在“自性空”之外,广泛使用了“體性空”、“無自性”、“自性本來空”、“自性常空寂”以及“自性離”等更为多样化的词汇来表达相同的法理。

2. “阴”与“蕴”的译词分歧: 在指代五蕴这一核心概念时,两经的译词表现出时代与译风的差异: * 《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》统一使用古译“五陰”或“五蔭”,如“法名五蔭,五蔭空”、“五陰……自性空”。 * 而《大寶積經》作为唐代译本,在译词上表现出过渡与混用的特征:一方面使用了新译的“蘊”,如“諸蘊無有實,自性本來空”、“超過蘊界處”;另一方面也保留并使用了“陰”字,如“陰生必敗壞,無事無自性”。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 与般若波罗蜜的关系: 《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》将自性空与般若波罗蜜直接等同,指出:“一切法自性空。自性空是非法,若非法即是般若波羅蜜。” 弟子舍利弗等亦赞叹般若波罗蜜即是“自性空波羅蜜”。当被问及若般若波罗蜜自性空,为何一切法能入其中时,佛陀解答说,因为“一切法一切法相空”,空无偏颇,故一切法皆入空中。

2. 与方便(漚和拘舍羅)及度化众生的关系: 既然一切法自性空,菩萨为何还要修行度众?《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》解释,菩萨因知“世間心皆顛倒”,若不用方便力则不能度脱众生,故行六波罗蜜,虽舍内外物却作“我無所捨”之想。菩萨以方便力(即“漚和拘舍羅”)引导众生认识到瞋者、所瞋之事皆是性空,从而建立众生于性空中。菩萨虽现种种身度化众生,但“亦不貪著是身。何以故?著者、著法、著處,是三法皆不可得,自性空故”。观诸法实相,即是观“一切法自性空,無眾生、無人、無我;一切法如幻、如夢、如響、如影、如焰、如化”。 《大寶積經》同样强调,虽然诸法体性空,但并不妨碍修行与度化众生,如经云:“雖說諸法體性空,世雄而令修習道”,佛陀是以方便演说诸法体性。

3. 与空解脱门及遣除执著的关系: 《大寶積經》指出,一切法空即是“空解脫門”。菩萨“善巧安住清淨性空”,以寂静心见一切法自性清净,并专门为那些“於自性空中而生見”的执著众生,演说诸法自性空的道理,令其远离生灭见,获得解脱。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》关于性空与有法空的定义: “一切法性,若有為法性若無為法性……是性性空,非常非滅故。何以故?性自爾。是名性空。” “有法名諸法和合中有自性相,是有法空,非常非滅故。何以故?性自爾。是名有法空。”

2. 《大寶積經》关于因缘和合与自性无所有的偈颂: “諸法以眾緣,和合而共起,眾緣和合故,自性無所有。”

3. 《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》关于自性空与般若波罗蜜之等同: “一切法自性空。自性空是非法,若非法即是般若波羅蜜。”

4. 《大寶積經》关于业报与自性离的阐述: “無有作業者、無有受報者……自性離故……體性皆空。”

By SutraAI-generated

入中論善顯密意疏B0044 · 藏傳論典部

《入中論善顯密意疏》對「自性空——一切法的自性本來空寂」之論述,可歸納為以下數端:

一、核心表述:一切法本來寂靜、自性湼槃 疏中引經明示:「佛薄伽梵,宣說一切諸法,本來寂靜,離自性生,自性湼槃。」並引寶雲經云:「佛轉妙法輪,宣說一切法,本寂靜不生,自性般湼槃。」此中「本來」之義,係明諸法不待瑜伽智證得方不生,乃於世間名言時即自性不生;自性不生故名寂靜,自性且無,云何得生?是故名為清淨湼槃。

二、「法性自空」——空不由他 疏中引寶積經云:「不以空性令諸法空,但法性自空。」若法有自相之體性,則非法性自空;若不從自體破除自性,須以他空而說名空,則違經旨。故以中道觀察諸法時,要從諸法自體空,方為自性空。 並以此破唯識宗「依他起自相不空,由無異體能取所取說名為空」之說。

三、空性之種種分類 疏中所列空名極為詳備: - 內空、外空:由內外諸法各別自性空而立。 - 空空:「諸法無自性,智者說名空,復說此空性,由空自性空,空性之空性,即說名空空,為除執法者執空故宣說。」 - 勝義空:涅槃法身由自性空,名勝義空。 - 有為空:三界由自性空,說名有為空。 - 畢竟空:離於常斷二邊之畢竟,由畢竟自性空。 - 本性空:「有為等法性,都非諸聲聞、獨覺與菩薩、如來之所作。」本性非他所作,本來如是安住,故由本性自性空,名本性空。 - 自相空:有為、無為法之自相,由彼自性空。 - 有性空:五蘊由彼自性空。 - 無性空:虛空、涅槃等無為法,由無性之自性空。 - 自性空:「自性無有性,說名自性空,此性非所作,故說名自性。」諸法本性非聲聞等所作,由是本性自性無有自性,名自性空。 - 他性空:自性空之異名,依勝義、無分別智所證、彼岸三義而立。

疏中並申明此等空性所破之執著不同,故廣中二時數說亦無重複之失。

四、觀我我所皆自性空而得解脫 疏中以父子相見經為據,析觀六界、六觸處、十八意近行皆非我執心之所緣,離諸蘊外亦無我執所緣,故我執所緣境非有自性。 又云:「見色等皆無自性可得,則緣色等自性之貪等煩惱,皆當隨滅。」聲聞獨覺便能不受後有而般湼槃,諸菩薩眾亦由大悲增上至未證菩提恆生三有。

五、信解自性空之功德 疏中引集經論云:「若信解甚深法,便能攝集一切福德,乃至未成佛以來,世出世間一切勝事皆能成辦。」又引如來藏經云:「假使眾生具足上品十不善法,若能悟入諸法無我,信解諸法本來清淨,則彼眾生必不墮惡趣。」

六、該疏所用之特殊術語 該疏以「自性空」為主體術語。經中「湼槃」一形為異體寫法,於疏文中有時與「涅槃」並用,讀者宜留意。 其空性之細分尤詳,自性空、本性空、自相空、有性空、無性空、他性空、空空、勝義空、有為空、畢竟空、內空、外空等並列而說,且各隨所破之執而立名,與他經常僅列十六空名之概說不同。

摩訶般若波羅蜜經T0223 · 般若部

本經(《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》,後秦鳩摩羅什譯)以「自性空」貫穿全經,視為般若波羅蜜之核心義理。論述要點如下:

一、自性空即般若波羅蜜之異名——舍利弗等讚歎般若波羅蜜時,直稱「自性空波羅蜜是菩薩摩訶薩般若波羅蜜」,與「自相空波羅蜜」「諸法空波羅蜜」「無法有法空波羅蜜」並列,明示自性空即是般若波羅蜜之體性。又云「一切法自性空。自性空是非法,若非法即是般若波羅蜜」,將自性空與般若波羅蜜直接會通。

二、自性空普遍施用於一切法——經文將自性空推及五蔭(經文作「五蔭」,而非「五陰」或「五蘊」)、六波羅蜜、般若波羅蜜、國土、佛性、善法等一切法。如:「色是不生法,自性空不欲令生;受想行識是不生法,自性空不欲令生」;「諸波羅蜜性無所、能作,自性空、虛誑如野馬」;「一切法自性空,無眾生、無人、無我」;「一切諸法自性空故」。

三、本經特有的三句並列句式——論述菩薩修證六神通(神足、天耳、他心、宿命、天眼、漏盡)時,形成固定術語:「神通事及己身皆不可得,自性空故、自性離故、自性無生故。不作是念:『我得……神通。』除為薩婆若心。」「自性空、自性離、自性無生」三者連用,為本經獨特之表述形式,反覆出現於神足通、天耳通、他心通、宿命通、天眼通之段落中。

四、自性空與菩薩行之會通——經中正面回應「若一切法自性空,云何菩薩摩訶薩行六波羅蜜,當得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提」之問難,指出菩薩行布施、持戒、忍辱等時,應觀「施者不可得、施報不可得、受者不可得」「汝所瞋者自性空」,以自性空為方便,於性空中建立眾生,次第示教利喜。

五、自性空與涅槃之究竟義——「諸法畢竟空即是涅槃」;「空不著空,空中無著者亦無著處。何以故?空中空相不可得」,顯示自性空即是涅槃、即是般若之究竟義。

六、十八空中之性空——於十八空之列舉中,經以「性空」為一項:「一切法性,若有為法性若無為法性……是性性空,非常非滅故。何以故?性自爾。是名性空」,此「性空」與「自性空」互通,皆指一切法之本性本空。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

本經論述「自性空」概念,主要以「自性空」、「體性空」、「本性空」、「自性本來空」等異名表述,術語層次豐富。

一、核心表述:諸法自性本來空寂 經中以偈頌反覆宣說:「諸法自性空,自性無有相,自性無有生,自性無有體」、「諸蘊無有實,自性本來空」、「界處亦如是,一切從緣起,自性本來空」,將自性空與無相、無生、無體相聯,強調一切法的自性本來空寂,而非後天空卻。又云「如是自性空,超過蘊界處,無妄無真實,亦無處非處」,將自性空置於超越蘊、界、處的甚深層次。

二、「體性空」與「自性空」交互使用 本經在夢喻開示中大量使用「體性空」,如「後識、後識體性空,緣、緣體性空,業、業體性空,死、死體性空」,乃至「涅槃、涅槃體性空,起、起體性空,壞、壞體性空」,列舉後識、緣、業、死、初識、受生、世間、涅槃、起、壞等皆體性空。此處「體性空」與「自性空」互通,皆指事物本性之空寂。

三、語言文字的自性空 本經獨特之處在於將自性空推向語言文字本身:「以於一切文字語業自性空故,文字語業亦復皆空」,進而「自他性空故,自他性亦空。自他空故彼則寂靜」,由自性空推展至自他二空。偈頌云「自性常空寂,遠離於文字,亦無能受持,讀誦修行者」,表明自性空不可執取為文字,亦無人能受持讀誦。復云「說偈文字皆自性空,一切諸法亦復如是皆自性空」,以文字之空證成諸法之空。

四、「本性空」與菩薩觀行 本經亦用「本性空」一詞,謂菩薩「覺彼眼法本性空故。如是覺已,終不生念我能覺知」,乃至覺耳、鼻、舌、身、意及色、聲、香、味、觸、法皆本性空;觀五陰時「觀見陰體本性自空」。又云「菩薩以寂靜心見一切法自性清淨,為諸眾生……演說諸法自性空義」,將自性清淨與自性空義結合,作為菩薩化度之方便。文殊師利更指出眾生「於自性空中而生見故」,故菩薩以無相、無願、無所作破其執著。

五、空有不二 本經以「彼智體性空,勝智如是說」點出勝智亦體性空;又云「雖說諸法體性空,世雄而令修習道」,在宣說體性空的同時仍令眾生修習道法,體現空有不二之立場。

Related