Dharma · AI Companion

處非處智力

sthānāsthāna-jñāna-bala

如实知可能与不可能的佛力。AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

Within the Buddhist path of liberation and the system of the Tathāgata's excellences, the 處非處智力 (Sanskrit: *sthānāsthāna-jñānabala*, "the power of knowing what is and what is not the case") occupies the first place among the 如來十力 (daśa-tathāgata-balāni, the ten powers of a Tathāgata).

To understand this concept, one must first refrain from breaking it down or narrowing it into some abstract philosophy or worldly logical reasoning.

* **“處” (是處, *sthāna*, "the case")**: refers to dharmas that accord with the law of cause and effect — what is logically and actually necessarily so, what must hold ("what is necessarily the case"). * **“非處” (*asthāna*, "not the case")**: refers to dharmas that contradict the law of cause and effect — what can never occur, what has no basis in principle ("what is absolutely not the case"). * **“智力” (*jñāna-bala*, "power of knowing")**: refers to the Tathāgata's supreme all-knowing wisdom (一切智智, *sarvajñatā*) — the power to see, accurately, thoroughly, without any obstacle and unshakably, what in the universe is "the case" and what is "not the case."

In the scriptures, this wisdom is described as inconceivable, measureless and boundless, vast as space itself. It is by no means a vague moral exhortation to goodness, but a "hardcore" mastery of the underlying mechanics by which the universe and the mind operate. The classical sources lay out its profound doctrinal import from four key dimensions:

1. The Iron Law of Karmic Retribution

The scriptures (such as the 《大寶積經》 *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra*) enumerate in detail the impassable "cases" and "non-cases" between the deeds of body, speech, and mind and their retributions:

* Deeds and circumstances: If one commits "evil deeds" with body, speech, and mind yet wishes to obtain a pleasant, delightful "agreeable retribution" — 無有是處 (*na sthānam etad vidyate*, "there is no basis for this"); that one reaps a painful "disagreeable retribution" — 斯有是處 (*sthānam etad vidyate*, "there is indeed a basis for this"). Conversely, if one commits "excellent deeds" (pure good actions) with body, speech, and mind yet reaps a disagreeable retribution — no such case; that one reaps an agreeable retribution — such a case exists. * Mental states and results: * Relying on 慳貪 (*mātsarya*, avarice and greed) yet wishing to obtain great wealth — no such case; being poor due to avarice — such a case exists. * Breaking the precepts yet wishing to be reborn in the good destinies of humans and devas — no such case; falling into the three woeful destinies (三惡趣) due to breaking the precepts — such a case exists. * Harboring 瞋恚 (*vyāpāda*, hatred and anger) yet wishing to obtain a handsome appearance and harmonious relationships — no such case; ugliness and adverse conditions due to hatred — such a case exists. * Cultivation and attainments: * Being 懈怠 (*kausīdya*, indolent) in conduct yet wishing to obtain the deep observation of "contemplative insight" (對觀) in meditative practice — no such case; * With scattered thoughts (心亂, *vikṣepa*, mental distraction) yet wishing to enter "right concentration" (正定, *samyak-samādhi*) or "correct determination" (正決定) — no such case; * Relying on opportunism or base cleverness (惡慧, *duṣprajñā*) yet wishing to forever sever the inner "continuity of habitual propensities" (習氣, *vāsanā*) — no such case.

2. The Necessity of the Tathāgata's Excellences and Self-Nature

This power is used not only to observe the karmic retribution of sentient beings, but also to determine the absolute state of the awakened one himself:

* If one says that the Tathāgata still has "continuity of habitual propensities," or that the Tathāgata's wisdom has any gap or obstacle — no such case; that the Tathāgata has exhausted all habitual propensities and that his wisdom is entirely unobstructed — such a case exists. * If one says that the Tathāgata has an unsettled mind, would speak untrue words, or would make mistakes or errors — no such case; that the Tathāgata's mind is ever in concentration, his words free of falsehood, and absolutely free of error — such a case exists.

3. The Ground of the Lion's Roar and Turning the Brahma Wheel

Attaining the "power of knowing what is and what is not the case" is the core mark of the Tathāgata ascending to the "station of the Great Sage" (大仙位, *mahārṣi-pada*). Because he has thoroughly penetrated what is necessary and impossible in causality, the Tathāgata can utter the fearless "lion's roar" (獅子吼, *siṃhanāda*) before the assembly, and turn the "unsurpassed wheel of Dharma" (無上法輪, also called the "great Brahma wheel," 大梵輪) that no deva, māra, brahmā, renunciant, or brahmin in the world can turn in accordance with Dharma.

4. Doctrinal Characterization: Absolute "Certainty" and the "Right Path" of Liberation

The 《雜阿含經》 (*Saṃyuktāgama*) gives an extremely incisive doctrinal characterization: "處非處智力者,我說是定非不定……定者正道,非定者邪道。" *"The power of knowing what is and what is not the case — I declare it to be certainty, not uncertainty... What is certain is the right path; what is uncertain is the wrong path."*

The "certainty" (定) here means that the law of cause and effect is a fixed, immovable reality of the universe — by no means accidental, random, or wavering ("not uncertainty"). Only when the practitioner's path is grounded in accurate knowledge of this "determinacy" is it the "right path"; if one clings to the fantasy that causality is uncertain and one might escape by luck, one has fallen into the "wrong path."


Walking Through It in Daily Life

Many contemporary people, when understanding Buddhist concepts, tend to map "causality" onto an emotionally colored "heavenly principle of good and evil retribution," or even mistake "處非處" for a mere moral constraint. Through a few contemporary life scenarios, we can conduct a "walk-through" strictly according to the scriptural definitions:

Scenario 1: Overtime, Overeating, and the Health Illusion

* The contemporary misconception (mapping error): "I stay up late scrolling my phone every day, my eating is completely chaotic, and I live in chronic anxiety and resentment — but if I buy the most expensive health supplements and pray most devoutly, my body and mind will become calm, healthy, and radiant." * Walk-through according to the 處非處智力: * From mental distraction and evil deeds of body, speech, and mind (a lifestyle that wrecks body and mind), wishing to obtain calm and health (an agreeable retribution) — no such case. * From hatred and inner attrition, obtaining a haggard face and disharmonious presence (ugliness / disagreeable retribution) — such a case exists. * Where people commonly go wrong: thinking that some external compensation (worshipping the Buddha, taking supplements, psychological comfort) can cancel out the underlying law of causality, overlooking the basic fact that "causality is an iron law (certain, not uncertain)."

Scenario 2: Workplace Rat Race, Opportunism, and the Craving for Success

* The contemporary misconception (mapping error): "As long as I'm shrewd enough, good at shifting blame, using petty cleverness (base wisdom) to scheme against colleagues, or desperately hoarding resources (avarice), I can secure lasting career security and inner fulfillment and abundance." * Walk-through according to the 處非處智力: * From avarice (a mentality of extreme lack and grasping) obtaining true inner wealth and security — no such case; obtaining lack and poverty (spiritual or material hunger) — such a case exists. * From base wisdom (the wrong cleverness of opportunism) yet wishing to eradicate anxiety and character flaws (forever severing the continuity of habitual propensities) — no such case. * Where people commonly go wrong: mistaking "short-term gain" in the worldly sense for a "good fruit," confusing the causal correspondence between short-term utilitarian means and long-term life conditions.

Scenario 3: Scrolling Short Videos While Craving Deep Thinking and Concentration

* The contemporary misconception (mapping error): "I absorb massive amounts of fragmented stimulation every day, letting my mind leap among gossip and anxiety (mental distraction / indolence), but I believe that as soon as I sit down, I can immediately enter deep concentration and insightful wisdom (right concentration / contemplative insight)." * Walk-through according to the 處非處智力: * From indolence (lacking diligent guarding of the mind) obtaining "contemplative insight" (profound observing wisdom) — no such case. * From mental distraction (an algorithm-driven scattered mind) entering "right concentration" or "correct determination" — no such case. * Where people commonly go wrong: thinking that "concentration" or "wisdom" is a kind of luck that can randomly descend, without understanding that they are fruits that strictly depend on the specific seed of "guarding the sense doors and rectifying mental attention."


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary society is an age of "shelves full of illusions." Algorithmic recommendation, instant feedback, and consumerism have constructed a vast world that breeds the illusion: we can bypass the underlying laws of causality and demand results.

We crave wisdom without focus, health without cost, and fulfilling intimate relationships while harboring hatred and control. This mentality of "wishing what is not the case to become the case" is precisely the root of contemporary people's endless anxiety and suffering.

* Breaking the "miracle illusion" and inner attrition: The 處非處智力 is like an extremely sharp ruler of reality. It reminds us that the universe operates with absolute order ("certain, not uncertain"). When you feel pain, there is no need to blame heaven or others — just measure yourself against this ruler: are you trying to squeeze "abundance" out of "avarice"? To demand "gentleness" from "hatred"? To extract "tranquility" from "mental distraction"? Once you clearly recognize that "not the case" can never occur, you will immediately cease futile delusions and the mentality of getting by on luck.

* Contrast with and transcendence of contemporary AI and algorithmic life: Contemporary large language models and recommendation algorithms are, in essence, doing probabilistic prediction (correlation analysis) — based on massive historical data, they tell you "what will most likely happen next." But correlation is not necessity. In contrast, the Tathāgata's 處非處智力 sees through to the ontic law of causality (necessity). * *Contrast and limits*: AI can predict the statistical probability that a person will develop anxiety under a certain behavioral pattern, but AI cannot perceive the "continuity of habitual propensities," nor can it guide the mind toward "correct determination" and liberation; science can reveal the correlation between neuronal firing and attention, but science cannot prove the responsiveness of karmic retribution at the level of ethics and the path of liberation. Analogies help us understand the objectivity of "law," but one must never equate the Tathāgata's 處非處智力 with modern big-data prediction or neuroscientific conclusions.

* A grounded entry point for practice: connecting the "five powers of the learner" with the "Tathāgata's power": The 《雜阿含經》 points out that although the 處非處智力 is the first of the ten powers on the Tathāgata's fruition stage, it is by no means unattainably high. A śrāvaka disciple, as long as he achieves "不諂不偽,質直心生" *"free of flattery and pretense, giving rise to a straightforward and upright mind"* (not deceiving himself, not pretending, with an extremely straightforward and pure heart), can, under instruction, achieve "實則知實、不實知不實" *"what is real he knows as real; what is not real he knows as not real."* By practicing his own "五學力" (*pañca-śaikṣa-balāni*, the five powers of the learner) — the powers of faith (信力), effort (精進力), mindfulness (念力), concentration (定力), and wisdom (慧力) — and observing the "cases" and "non-cases" of daily life as they are, the disciple can connect ordinary practice with the Tathāgata's unsurpassed wisdom and obtain a real "ground of superior progress" (勝進處).

Common Misreadings and Clarifications

Misreading 1: Taking 處非處 as Mechanical Fatalism

* Clarification: Fatalism holds that "everything is predetermined, and effort is useless." The 處非處智力, by contrast, speaks of the necessity of conditions and causality (the law of cause and effect). It tells you: what kind of cause is absolutely impossible (non-case) to produce a certain fruit, and what kind of cause necessarily can (case) lead to a certain fruit. This is not only not fatalism — it actually grants people the greatest agency: as long as you change the current cause (turning from evil deeds to excellent deeds, from mental distraction to right concentration), the retribution necessarily changes accordingly.

Misreading 2: Thinking the 處非處智力 Is Merely a Cold Judge or Moral Preaching

* Clarification: In the scriptures, the Tathāgata uses this power not only to declare causality, but above all for the precise deliverance of sentient beings. With this power, the Tathāgata can accurately know whether a given sentient being at present possesses the faculties to hear the Dharma of liberation (whether he is a "vessel of the path of liberation"). If so, he proclaims the excellent Dharma for him; if the conditions are not yet ripe (in a "non-case" state), the Tathāgata compassionately "sets it aside for the time being" and waits for the right moment. This is a precise salvific response grounded in profound insight, not a cold moral judgment.

Misreading 3: Since This Is One of the "Ten Powers of the Tathāgata," Ordinary People and Practitioners Have Nothing to Do with It?

* Clarification: The 處非處智力 among the ten powers of the Tathāgata is indeed a complete, unobstructed, absolute wisdom, but it has a clear gradational extension in practice. As mentioned above, the scriptures emphasize that if disciples can be "free of flattery and pretense, giving rise to a straightforward and upright mind," and rely on the "five powers of the learner," they too can, at their own level, achieve "是處如實知是處,非處如實知非處" *"what is the case they know as it is; what is not the case they know as it is not."* When in daily life you no longer harbor illusions about "luck that defies causality" and calmly accept the iron law that "you reap what you sow," you are already following and practicing this power of wisdom that comes from the Tathāgata.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

「处非处智力」(梵语:sthānāsthāna-jñānabala)是如来十力(十种如来力)之首。其核心定义是指如来以无上上一切智智,于“是处”(合乎因果道理、必然如此之法)如实知是处,于“非处”(不合因果道理、绝无此理之法)如实知非处。在经典中,这一智力被形容为不可思议、无量无边,犹如虚空般无边无际。

二、 主要阐述

1. 因果业报的合理性判定: 根据经典阐释,处非处智力最直接的体现是对因果业报规律的如实了知。例如,身语意之“恶行”能感得可爱、可乐等可意报,无有是处;能感得不可意报,斯有是处。反之,身语意之“妙行”能感得不可意报,无有是处;能感得可意报,斯有处。此外,由悭贪而感大富、由犯戒而生人天、由瞋恚而感端正、由懈怠而得“对观”、心乱者入“正决定”、由恶慧而永断一切“习气相续”,皆无有是处;而由悭贪感贫穷、由毁犯戒感三恶趣、由瞋恚感丑陋、由懈怠不得对观、心乱不入正定、由恶慧不断习气,皆斯有是处。

2. 如来功德与自性的必然性: 此智力还用于判定如来自身的功德与自性。若说如来仍有“习气相续”或如来之智有障碍,无有是处;而一切如来习气永断、佛智无碍,斯有是处。若有人能观如来顶,或能知如来心之所住,无有是处;无能观、不能知,斯有是处。若言如来有不定心、行不实语或有误失,无有是处;如来心恒在定,是真实谛不异语者,且无有误失,斯有是处。若说如来于现在世有障碍智见转,无有是处;无障无碍智见转,斯有是处。

3. 成就最胜与转法轮: 成就此智力是如来成就至高无上地位的关键。若成就包括“处非处如实知”在内的十种如来力,如来便能“得先佛最胜处,能转梵轮,于大众中师子吼而吼”。此智力能令如来处于“大仙位”(或“大仙尊位”),于大众中作正师子吼,转无上法轮(大梵轮),这是世间其余沙门、婆罗门、天、魔、梵等皆无法如法转动的。

4. 度化众生与解答问难: 在度化众生时,如来依此智力能如实了知众生是否为“解脱道器”,若是则为其宣说妙法,若非则知其为“非处”而暂且舍置。当有外来者或弟子前来询问关于“处非处智力”的问题时,如来乃是凭借自身“成等正觉”时所达到的“所知、所见、所觉”来为其详细解答与记说。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

1. 术语形式的多样性: - 《杂阿含经》:在论及如来如何以此智力为他人记说时,使用了“处非处力”和“处非处智力”;在列举十力时,将第一种力明确表述为“如来处非处如实知”,并称其为“初力”;在另一处则使用了“是处如实知非处”的表述;在总结其本质属性时,简称为“处非处智”。 - 《大宝积经》:将该智力阐释为如来十力中的“第一之力”或“第一处非处智力”,其核心定义表述为“于是处如实知是处,于非处如实知非处”。

2. 独特佛教术语的差异: - 《大宝积经》:使用了独特的佛教术语,如以“身妙行、语妙行、意妙行”来对称身语意三恶行;以“对观”指代某种禅修观行;以“正决定”与“正定”并提;并多次提及断除“习气相续”。此外,关于转法轮的威力,除了表述为“转无上法轮”外,还特别表述为“转大梵轮”或“转梵轮”。 - 《杂阿含经》:在表述转法轮时,使用了“能转梵轮”。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. “定”与“正道”: 《杂阿含经》对“处非处智力”提出了一个极具特色的本质定性,指出:“处非处智力者,我说是定非不定……定者正道,非定者邪道。”。在这里,如来明确将“处非处智力”定性为“定”(决定、确定),而非“不定”,并进一步将“定”等同于“正道”,将“非定”等同于“邪道”。这说明处非处智力不仅是一种认知因果合理性的能力,更代表了不移的、决定性的宇宙实相与解脱正道。

2. 弟子的修行实践(五学力): 《杂阿含经》将如来的处非处智力与弟子的修行实践相结合。若声闻弟子做到“不谄不伪,质直心生”,在如来的教诫与教授下,便能“实则知实、不实知不实,上则知上、无上则知无上”,从而了知一切当知、当见、当得、当觉之法,得胜进处。在这一修行成就的过程中,经文并列提出了“五学力”(信力、精进力、念力、定力、慧力)与“十种如来力”(以“是处如实知非处”为首),表明如来的处非处智力与弟子的五学力修行是相辅相成的。

3. 菩萨的修行誓愿: 《大宝积经》指出,对于菩萨而言,闻此甚深智力后应深生欢喜,发起勇猛精进,誓愿在证得如来处非处智力之前,绝不懈废。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《雜阿含經》卷二十六:“處非處智力者,我說是定非不定……定者正道,非定者邪道。” 2. 《大寶積經》卷三十八:“如來以無上上一切智智,於是處如實知是處,於非處如實知非處。” 3. 《大寶積經》卷一一一:“身妙行、語妙行、意妙行……感不可意報,無有是處;感可意報,斯有是處。”

By SutraAI-generated

入中論善顯密意疏B0044 · 藏傳論典部

《入中論善顯密意疏》將「處非處智力」列為能仁十力之首,並以此為廣釋十力時前五力中的第一項。全書在此使用的術語正是「處非處智力」,又以「處非處智」作為科判中的略稱;原文未另立「是處非處智力」或其他異名。其後依次列舉業異熟智力、種種勝解智力、種種界智力、根勝劣智力等,顯示此力在十力體系中的位置與次第。

本論先從因果決定關係解釋「處」:若某一果法決定由某一因法而生,諸佛如實了知,即說該因是此果之「處」。原文舉出兩類例證:一是不善業能生不可愛果,二是由聖有學道得涅槃。由此可見,「處」不是泛指場所,而是指某果依其相應因而生的合理、可能及決定關係。

與上述因果關係相違者,則稱為「非處」。原文以善業生不可愛果為例,指出此種因果配屬與前說相反;又說已得見道者,若仍隨業力受第八生,也是「皆無是處」。因此,「非處」所標示的是與既定因果條件不相應、不能成立的情形;本論以「皆無是處」直接表達其不可能性。

處與非處並不限於少數例證,其所緣境被說為「無量無邊」。諸佛之智對這一切可能與不可能的因果關係,皆能「無礙著轉」,故名「處非處智力」。這一表述同時揭示本論所重的兩面:所知境極其廣大,而佛智於其中又無滯礙、無黏著地運轉;「力」即由此種無礙了知而安立。

頌文又以「愛與非愛違上相」概括果報的相應與相違,並連同「盡業及彼種種果」而說佛之智力能「無礙別別轉」。此處不僅總說業與果,也強調對各別業及其種種果報分別無礙而知;其所遍及的範圍則是「遍三世境」,即通達過去、現在、未來三世中的相關境界。

綜合而言,本論以因果是否相應來界定處與非處:果定從相應因生,是「處」;違反此種因果配屬、不能成立,是「非處」。佛於無量無邊的處非處境,以及三世中諸業與種種果,皆能各別、無礙地了知,因此稱為「處非處智力」。其論述特色在於以具體的善惡業果及見道後受生限制為例,並以「無礙著轉」「無礙別別轉」「遍三世境」說明此智力的運作方式與所緣範圍。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》對「處非處智力」的論述,集中於佛陀住舍衛國祇樹給孤獨園時之開示。本經將此概念置於如來十力之整體框架中加以闡明,呈現出若干獨特側面。

一、名稱與術語形式。本經兼用「處非處力」與「處非處智力」二詞,前者為略稱,後者為全稱,二者在同一段落中交替出現,如「如來處非處力,如如來處非處智力所知見覺」()。經文亦以「如如來處非處智等正覺所知所見所覺」之格式表述(、),強調如來對處非處之智的「所知、所見、所覺」三重圓滿證知,並冠以「等正覺」凸顯其無上正等之自證特質。此外,中又以「是處如實知非處」之縮寫形式提示此智之內涵。

二、作為十力之首。本經明列處非處智力為如來十力之首,並以「如上十力廣說」之語提示尚有更完整之序列。在中,與處非處智力並列提及的如來智力依序為:自以樂受智力、禪定解脫三昧正受智力、宿命所更智力、天眼智力、漏盡智力。須留意者,本段僅具列六項,並未完整開展十力之名目,其完整內容指向「如上」之文。

三、與五學力之對應關係。提出「五學力」與「十種如來力」之層級架構:先舉「信力、精進力、念力、定力、慧力」為五學力,再進而開顯十種如來力,處非處智力即十力之首。此一架構顯示,處非處智力乃建立在五種根本修行力之上的究竟智慧,非僅為抽象之知解。

四、「定非不定」之核心判教。提出本經獨特之教判:「處非處智力者,我說是定非不定,乃至漏盡智者,我說是定非不定,定者正道,非定者邪道。」此語明確界定處非處智力的本質——其所決斷者皆是必然之定論,非模稜兩可之說;「定者正道,非定者邪道」一句,更將此智定性為區別正法與邪道的關鍵準據。

五、為眾記說之教用。本經反覆強調此智的教化功能:若有眾生前來問詢處非處智力,如來即以自身正等覺之「所知、所見、所覺」為彼記說(、、)。此反覆結構顯示,處非處智力不僅是如來自內圓證之境,更是對外為眾生決斷疑惑的實踐智慧。

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》將「處非處智力」列為如來十力之首。其論述具有以下幾個特色:

一、概念定位與十力次第。處非處智力為如來十力之第一種力。十力依次為:處非處智力、業報智力、種種界智力、種種解智力、種種根智力、一切遍行行智力、靜慮解脫三摩地三摩鉢底雜染清淨智力、隨念前世宿住作證智力、死生作證智力、漏盡作證智力()。

二、核心表述。本經以「於是處如實知是處,於非處如實知非處」界定其內涵。在判斷形式上,本經以「有所攝受」標示「是處」(斯有是處),以「無所攝受」標示「非處」(無有是處)——「有所攝受」「無所攝受」即肯定與否定之表述,為本經獨特的術語形式()。

三、業報因果層面的應用。本經從善惡業與果報的對應關係詳細論說處非處:身語意惡行感可愛報無有是處,感不可愛報斯有是處;身語意妙行感不可愛報無有是處,感可愛報斯有是處。又舉由慳得大富、由犯戒得生人天、由瞋恚感端正、由懈怠得對觀、由心亂入正定、由惡慧永斷習氣,皆「無有是處」;反之,由慳感貧窮、由毀戒感三惡趣、由瞋恚感醜陋、由懈怠不得對觀、由心亂不入正定、由惡慧不斷習氣,皆「斯有是處」()。

四、如來自性層面的應用。本經進一步將處非處智力應用於如來自身功德:若謂如來習氣相續、佛智有礙、能觀如來頂、能知如來心住、如來有不定心、如來行不實語、諸佛誤失可得、如來於現在世有障有礙智見轉者,皆「無有是處」;反之,如來習氣永斷、佛智無礙、無人能觀如來頂、無人能知如來心住、諸佛世尊心恒在定、如來是真語實語諦語不異語者、由無誤失故名為佛薄伽梵、佛薄伽梵於現在世無障無礙智見轉者,皆「斯有是處」()。

五、量的譬喻。本經稱處非處智力「不可思議無量無邊」,以虛空為喻:「譬如虛空無邊無際,如是如來處非處智力無邊無際亦復如是」;並以頌總結:「十方虛空無邊量,處非處智亦無邊,如實知處非處已,為眾廣宣微妙法」()。

六、菩薩實踐面向。本經在論述菩薩毘利耶波羅蜜多時,將如來處非處智力列為菩薩精進所求之目標:菩薩應發大勇猛堅固精進,「未得如來如是處非處智力已來,於其中間發大勇猛堅固精進終無懈廢」()。

七、用詞說明。本經以「處非處智力」名此第一力,與一般經論所用名稱一致;其獨特處在以「是處」「非處」配以「有所攝受」「無所攝受」之表達方式區判因果與佛德之成立與否。

Related