Dharma · AI Companion

聲聞乘

śrāvakayāna

依佛声教修证解脱的法乘。AI-generated

Type FrameworkDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ III · nominal designationInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

〔判教镜头〕三乘家读为究竟解脱道(一);一乘家依《法华》会三归一,读为假名施设之化城方便(三)。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

Here is a deep and accessible exploration of the concept of the Hearer Vehicle, written for a contemporary reader as requested.


If you look at the entire landscape of the Buddhist path of liberation, there is a fundamental vehicle, an emergency escape pod out of the burning house of cyclic existence. This is the 聲聞乘 (Śrāvakayāna), commonly translated as the Hearer Vehicle or the Disciple's Vehicle.

To understand this concept is to understand the absolute baseline of Buddhist awakening. It is a path of profound disenchantment, laser-focused precision, and ultimate self-liberation. Let us unpack it, not as a dusty dictionary entry, but as a living framework for untangling the human predicament.

这个概念在说什么 (What This Concept is Talking About)

To grasp the Śrāvakayāna, we must break down its name and its mechanics according to the classical sutras.

1. The Meaning of "Hearer" (聲聞 - Śrāvaka) The term literally means "voice-hearer." A practitioner of this vehicle achieves realization by listening to the voice and teachings of the Buddha or his disciples (從他聞聲而解了). They do not discover the path entirely on their own (as a Pratyekabuddha does), but rely on the transmission of the Dharma. The classical texts characterize them as "understanding by following the words of others" (隨他語解).

2. The Psychological Fuel: Aversion to the Three Realms (厭離三界) The defining psychological characteristic of this vehicle is a profound world-weariness. The practitioner looks at the entirety of conditioned existence—the realm of desire, the realm of form, and the formless realm (the Three Realms)—and feels an absolute, chilling clarity that it is "blazing with the mass of suffering" (一切諸行眾苦熾然). They no longer want to upgrade their seat on the Titanic; they want to get off the ship entirely.

3. The Mechanics and Metaphors: Dissecting Reality The core curriculum of the Śrāvakayāna is the Four Noble Truths (四谛法). To realize these truths, practitioners do not just sit peacefully; they engage in rigorous, surgical deconstruction of reality through meditation (such as contemplation of impurity / 不淨觀).

In earlier translations like the *Mahāsamnipāta Sūtra* (大方等大集經), the classical definitions of what they contemplate are mapped with terrifyingly precise metaphors. They do not view reality as a vague illusion; they break down experience into structural components and apply specific analogies that must not be mixed up: * 觀陰如怨 (Contemplating the Aggregates as Enemies): The *Yin* (陰) or *Skandhas* are the Five Aggregates (form, feeling, perception, mental formations, consciousness) that make up our psycho-physical existence. The Hearer views them as assassins or enemies. Why? Because we feed and protect our body and mind, yet they inevitably betray us through aging, sickness, death, and relentless craving. * 界如毒蛇 (Contemplating the Elements as Poisonous Snakes): The *Jie* (界) or *Dhātus* are the Eighteen Elements (the six sense organs, their six corresponding external objects, and the six resulting consciousnesses). The Hearer sees them as vipers. When the eye meets a beautiful form, or the mind meets a stimulating thought, a "bite" occurs—injecting the venom of greed, anger, or ignorance. * 入如空聚 (Contemplating the Sense Bases as Empty Villages): The *Ru* (入) or *Āyatanas* are the Twelve Sense Bases (the six internal organs and six external objects). The Hearer contemplates them as deserted, empty towns. When a sensory event happens, it feels like there is a "self" experiencing it. But upon close inspection, the village is entirely empty; there is no permanent resident (no self) inside the eyes, ears, or mind, only a mechanical process of contact and reaction.

Through this, they achieve the Five-part Dharma Body (五分法身: precepts, concentration, wisdom, liberation, knowledge and vision of liberation) and attain the fruit of an Arhat, dwelling in ultimate tranquility (實際究竟寂靜).

4. The Mahayana Critique: The Limitation of the Vehicle While the Hearer Vehicle successfully achieves self-liberation, Mahayana texts point out its limitations. The Hearer is described as having "narrow and inferior wisdom" (智慧狹劣) and "lacking great compassion" (缺大悲心). Because their primary drive is to escape (住於自事 - dwelling in self-affairs), they do not cultivate the vast, world-engaging vows of a Bodhisattva. Consequently, they cannot achieve *Sarvajñā* (一切智), the omniscience of a Buddha. When a Buddha displays vast, cosmic transformations, the Hearers are metaphorically blind and deaf to them, having never planted the necessary seeds of boundless compassion.

生活里的走查 (Walkthrough in Daily Life)

Let’s bring this classical deconstruction into a contemporary scenario: riding the subway home after a brutal day of overtime, aggressively doomscrolling on your phone.

Step 1: The Hearing (聲聞) You are scrolling, feeling miserable. You remember a podcast or a book you read about Buddhist philosophy—the teaching that "all conditioned phenomena are suffering" (諸行無常, 諸行皆苦). You are literally "hearing the voice" of the teaching and applying it to this moment.

Step 2: The Aversion (厭離) Normally, your reaction to overtime is to desire a better job, or your reaction to stress is to seek a dopamine hit from a video. But right now, you experience a genuine *厭離* (aversion). You realize the whole cycle—working to buy things, seeking dopamine to cope with work—is a trap. You don't just want a new job; you want out of the psychological hamster wheel entirely.

Step 3: The Surgical Deconstruction (Applying the Metaphors) * *The Aggregates as Enemies (觀陰如怨):* You look at your exhaustion. Your physical body (form), the headache (feeling), your recognition of the subway ads (perception), your urge to quit your job (mental formations), and your basic awareness (consciousness). Instead of coddling them, you realize these five aggregates are the very hostages keeping you bound. They are the enemies that demand constant maintenance and still make you suffer. * *The Elements as Poisonous Snakes (界如毒蛇):* You observe the exact moment your thumb scrolls to an enraging news headline. Your eye (organ) meets the screen (object), generating visual and mental consciousness. *Snap.* The snake bites. Anger floods your system. You see the mechanics of sensory contact as a dangerous, venomous interaction, not harmless entertainment. * *The Sense Bases as Empty Villages (入如空聚):* You close your eyes. The phone is gone, the sound of the train remains. Where is the "I" that is so stressed? You look into the mind and the body (the internal bases) and the sounds and thoughts (the external bases). You search for the victim of this terrible day. You find nothing but passing data. The village is completely empty. No one is home to suffer.

Pointing out the mapping error: The most common mistake contemporary people make here is confusing *aversion* (厭離) with clinical depression, nihilism, or suicidal ideation. Depression is an ego-centric collapse heavily entangled in the story of "I am a failure" or "life is unfair." The Śrāvakayāna’s aversion is highly energetic, clinically precise, and joyful in its detachment. It doesn't hate life; it clearly sees the structural impossibility of finding permanent happiness in transient things.

当代人为什么需要它 (Why Contemporary People Need It)

We live in an era of relentless optimization. We try to optimize our health, our finances, our relationships, and even our "mindfulness" so we can be more productive at work.

To use an analogy from our contemporary experience: much of our lives operates like an AI machine-learning algorithm trapped in a flawed objective function. We keep adjusting our weights and biases to maximize "pleasure" and minimize "pain" within the dataset of worldly life. The Śrāvakayāna is not a prompt to tweak the algorithm; it is the emergency shutdown command. It tells us that the hardware itself is burning up, the dataset is corrupted by the Three Realms, and no amount of optimization will fix the fundamental error. *(Note: While AI is a useful analogy for behavioral loops, Buddhist epistemology views human consciousness as fundamentally different from algorithmic computation, primarily due to the presence of karmic seeds and the ultimate nature of mind).*

Contemporary people desperately need the Hearer Vehicle because without this foundational realization—the absolute necessity of escaping the cycle of suffering—modern spirituality easily degrades into mere stress-reduction techniques. You cannot build the vast, altruistic mansion of the Bodhisattva path if you do not first recognize that the ground you are standing on is on fire.

常见误读与澄清 (Common Misinterpretations and Clarifications)

Misreading 1: Hearers have zero compassion and only care about themselves. *Clarification:* This is a gross oversimplification. Classical texts like the *Mahāsamnipāta Sūtra* clarify that Hearers *do* cultivate compassion, but through a specific lens. They do not look at the joys of beings; they focus exclusively on the deep, structural sufferings (the Eight Sufferings). For example, they meditate on the biological realities of embryonic development (using ancient terms like *Kalala* / 歌羅羅 or *Arbuda* / 頞浮陀 to describe the messy, painful stages of fetal growth in the womb). By seeing all beings trapped in this biological and karmic machinery, they generate profound pity and sympathy. However, this pity leads them to urge others to escape, rather than generating the Bodhisattva's vow to remain in the muck to save everyone.

Misreading 2: The Hearer Vehicle and the Great Vehicle (Mahayana) are opposing religions. *Clarification:* While Mahayana texts often critique the Hearer's "narrow wisdom," they ultimately hold a non-dual view. The Bodhisattva is taught to avoid dwelling in the Hearer Vehicle for themselves, lest they lose their Bodhi-mind (such as through fear of suffering or stinginess with the Dharma, which texts warn causes regression). Yet, in their skillful means to help others, Bodhisattvas can read the spiritual capacities of beings and perfectly teach the Śrāvakayāna to those who need it. Ultimately, from the perspective of absolute reality, the Buddha declares: *"The Śrāvaka vehicle is the Great Vehicle, the Great Vehicle is the Śrāvaka vehicle; these two vehicles have no difference"* (聲聞乘者即是大乘,大乘者即聲聞乘,如是二乘無有差別). Bodhisattva Mañjuśrī notes that in ultimate truth, one makes "no view of ordinary beings, no view of sages."

Misreading 3: "Aversion" means I should quit my job and go live in a cave. *Clarification:* Aversion (厭離) is an epistemological shift, not a geographical one. You can sit in a cave and still have your mind bitten by the "poisonous snakes" of memory and fantasy. You can sit in a crowded subway and view the sensory inputs as an "empty village." The Hearer Vehicle is about ending the inner complicity with suffering, severing the fuel line of ignorance right where you stand.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

声闻乘(śrāvakayāna),又称声闻道、声闻地,是佛教三乘之一。其核心要义在于修行者通过听闻佛陀或他人的声教而觉悟,以“厌离三界”为主要心理特征,通过修持四谛、不净观等法门,旨在断除烦恼、证得阿罗汉果以实现自度与出离。在经典中,声闻乘既被视为一种基础的解脱途径,也被大乘经典指出具有“智慧狭劣”、“缺大悲心”等局限性。

二、 主要阐述

1. 形成因缘与修行特征 声闻乘的形成源于特定的修行心态与方法。根据《大方广佛华严经》,修行者虽修习“上品十善业道”,但因“心狭劣故”、“怖三界故”、“缺大悲故”,且必须“从他闻声而解了故”,因而成就声闻乘。其特质被概括为“随他语解,智慧狭劣”。在《大方等大集经》中,声闻乘同样被描述为依他闻法而生正见,若无佛出世则无声闻乘。

2. 修持法门与证果 声闻乘的核心教法为“四谛法”。行者通过修持不净观、白骨观,系心眉间,观察四真谛,从而获得舍摩他定与八正道,证得从须陀洹果直至阿罗汉果(学无学地)。在闻法修行过程中,声闻能依次具足戒聚、定聚、慧聚、解脱聚、解脱知见聚(即五分法身),并能获得“随顺音声忍”。其最终安住于“声闻果”,于“无有谛”中获得决定智,常住于“实际究竟寂静”。

3. 自度局限与大悲缺失 各经均指出声闻乘具有自度与不共大悲的局限性。《大宝积经》指出,声闻乘人以“厌离三界”为特征,虽在甚深法中勤修行,但未曾听闻大乘甚深法,常被视为“自出度”的途径。《大方等大集经》描述其“心常毁呰厌离三界”,将一切行视为无常、苦、无我、寂灭,甚至“一念不悕受生”。而在《大方广佛华严经》中,声闻乘被明确指出“远离大悲,舍于众生,住于自事”,这导致他们无法积集或通达一切智(萨婆若)地。即使身处逝多林中面对如来的广大神变,也因未种萨婆若地善根而“不能见、不能知、不能闻、不能入”。

4. 菩萨的对待态度与调伏方便 大乘菩萨对待声闻乘持有一种双重态度:一方面在自身修行中坚决远离,另一方面在度化众生时善巧利用。 在自身修行上,菩萨“不乐声闻地、不求声闻乘、不爱乐说声闻乘处、不亲近声闻乘者”,修持陀罗尼者也应舍离“赞声闻乘毁如来法”的非法之人。菩萨虽能以智慧现前“入声闻道”,但“不以此道而取出离”。 在化导众生上,菩萨能以他心通如实了知众生是否有“声闻乘行根”或“声闻乘因所生根”,并随顺其心“调伏安置于声闻乘”。对于“信乐声闻乘”的众生,善知识会为其宣说“胜智光明”法门以作引导。

5. 退失菩提而趣向声闻乘的因缘 《大宝积经》详细阐述了菩萨退失大乘、转入声闻乘的因缘。在家菩萨若有“怖畏三恶道而将大菩提视为重担”、“行施后追悔且不回向佛智”、“不勤精进而专求多闻”等三法,会退失菩提,“速趣声闻乘而般涅槃”。此外,亲近恶知识、不闻菩萨藏等大乘经典、计着吾我起邪见、悭悋惜法等四法,也会导致菩萨退失成声闻乘。

6. 声闻乘的慈悲与三昧表现 《大方等大集经》指出,声闻乘虽不若菩萨广度众生,但亦修持悲心。其方法是不观众生乐相、不分怨亲,而是专注于观察众生的“八苦”与“三苦”,特别是通过观察胎中发育的“歌罗罗”、“頞浮陀”等不净与痛苦过程,从而对众生生起极大的怜愍。其三昧则被定义为“不善三昧,三界身,颠倒攀缘,不净想,厌离相,不憙乐性”,包括空、无相、无愿心心法三昧等。

7. 实趣观与圆融观 在超越二元的实相观中,《大宝积经》中文殊师利指出观“声闻乘”与“声闻戒”时,“不作凡夫见、不作圣人见……非见非不见”,以此显现菩提无言无说、二俱相空的本质。而《大方等大集经》中,佛陀亦指出“声闻乘者即是大乘,大乘者即声闻乘,如是二乘无有差别”的圆融视角。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同经典和译本中,关于声闻乘及相关法相的用词存在明显的部类特征与时代差异: 1. 五蕴与处界的译语差异:在论述声闻乘所观的法相时,《大方等大集经》(大集部)使用了较为早期的译语,如以“阴”指代五蕴,以“界”指代十八界,以“入”指代十二处(十二入),其观照表述为“观阴如怨,界如毒蛇,入如空聚”。而在其他大乘经典中,多采用“蕴”、“处”、“界”等译语。 2. 胎相音译的差异:在描述声闻乘观察胎内发育以起悲心时,《大方等大集经》使用了“歌罗罗”、“頞浮陀”、“伽那”、“闭尸”等早期音译,这些在后译经典中常有不同的译名(如羯罗蓝、頞部昙、闭尸、键南等)。 3. 并称术语的差异:在《大宝积经》中,“声闻乘”常与“声闻道”、“声闻地”、“声闻众”等术语并称;而在《大方广佛华严经》中,则多出现“声闻道”、“声闻行”、“声闻果”等系统化表述。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 与辟支佛乘(缘觉乘)、大乘(菩萨乘)的关系:声闻乘通常与辟支佛乘、大乘并称为“三乘”。众生随其智力与因缘,可选择受持声闻乘等不同教法以求度脱。 2. 层级与障碍关系:大乘无上乘能“映蔽诸缘觉及以声闻乘”。在《大方等大集经》中,“乐声闻乘”被列为阻碍众生疾得大乘的“三十二事”之首。在“长者救子”的隐喻中,落入厕所(三界)的孩子无法被母亲救起,此“母不能拔”即隐喻声闻与缘觉,而能救济的父亲则隐喻菩萨。 3. 功德对比:置一众生于佛菩提,其功德远胜于令三千大千世界众生皆得阿罗汉果或置于缘觉地,因为佛种不断才能出生声闻缘觉。 4. 比喻关系:在《大方等大集经》中,将三乘人所证比喻为衣物,其中“毳”(粗毛织物)比喻声闻,“叠”(棉织物)比喻缘觉,“憍奢耶衣”(蚕丝织物)比喻菩萨乘。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《大宝积经》:“以声闻乘而自出度。” 2. 《大方等大集经》:“声闻乘者即是大乘,大乘者即声闻乘,如是二乘无有差别。” 3. 《大方广佛华严经》:“随他语解,智慧狭劣。” 4. 《大方广佛华严经》:“远离大悲,舍于众生,住于自事。”

By SutraAI-generated

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》在此段並未以一段專門的義理解釋來界定「聲聞乘」,而是把它置於聖眾、三乘與布施福田的脈絡中加以說明。佛告師子長者,如來聖眾「可敬、可貴」,是世間無上福田;眾中不但有「四向、四得」,亦有「聲聞乘、辟支佛乘、佛乘」。由此可見,本經將聲聞乘列為三乘之一,並與辟支佛乘、佛乘並舉,而不是以部類名稱或其他經號代稱。

本經對聲聞乘最核心的表述,是「今此眾中有四向、四得及聲聞乘、辟支佛乘、佛乘」以及「三乘之道皆出乎眾」。聲聞乘因此是在聖眾之中可求的修道之乘;欲得三乘之道的善男子、善女人,皆「當從眾中求之」。原文著重其與僧眾的關係,並未在此進一步分述聲聞乘的修行次第、教法內容或所得果位。

此段的獨特側面,是以布施聖眾的議題帶出聲聞乘。佛先澄清,稱歎施眾之福,並不等於命人只供養聖眾而不供養其他眾生;即使施與畜生仍能獲福,只是福有多少之別。其所以特別稱歎聖眾,正在於聖眾是無上福田,且四向、四得與三乘皆在眾中。故聲聞乘在此不是孤立的概念,而是佛說明聖眾何以可敬、可貴,以及三乘之道何以應從眾中求取時所列舉的一項。

後文又由天人依修行者的差別加以辨識,次第說出持戒與犯戒、向與得須陀洹、斯陀含、阿那含、阿羅漢,繼而分別「此是聲聞乘,此是辟支佛乘,此是佛乘」,並稱施與不同對象所得福德有少有多。這顯示本經原文確實使用「聲聞乘」作為辨別修道所屬之乘的術語,並與四向四果相關名目同列;然而師子長者仍憶念如來教誡,對天人的分別默然不應,堅持布施時不選擇其人。

在用詞方面,《增壹阿含經》此處明用「聲聞乘」,與「辟支佛乘」「佛乘」合稱「三乘」;原文未在此使用其他異稱,也未將「聲聞乘」直接改稱為某一果位。四向、四得與三乘在句法上並列,故記錄本經概念時,宜保留「聲聞乘」這一原詞,並注意它在本段所呈現的是聖眾中三乘之一,而非四向四得本身。

摩訶般若波羅蜜經T0223 · 般若部

《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》論「聲聞乘」,首先將它置於三乘並列的架構中,以「聲聞乘、辟支佛乘、佛乘」為固定次第。經文由我、眾生乃至知者、見者「無所有」推至聲聞乘無所有,再由聲聞乘依次推及辟支佛乘、佛乘、聲聞人、須陀洹乃至佛與一切種智皆無所有,終歸一切諸法不可得。故本經雖立聲聞乘之名,卻不將其視為可得的實體;其核心表述是聲聞乘與行者、果位及諸法同在「無所有」「不可得」的般若觀照之中。

本經不只用「聲聞乘」,亦用「聲聞道」「求聲聞道」「聲聞人」及「聲聞地」等形式。「聲聞乘」多與辟支佛乘、佛乘並稱;「聲聞道」則指所求、所行之道,如善男子、善女人無論求佛道、辟支佛道或聲聞道,皆應供養、恭敬、尊重、讚歎般若波羅蜜。由此可見,本經將般若波羅蜜說為三類求道者共同應尊奉之法,而非僅與菩薩求佛道相關。

就聲聞乘在世間出現的條件而言,本經以菩薩學六波羅蜜乃至十八不共法、證得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提為根本脈絡;由成佛故,世間乃有聲聞、辟支佛,並有聲聞乘、辟支佛乘、佛乘同時出現。這一段的獨特側面,是從菩薩學法、成佛及佛法出現的次第,說明聲聞乘得以現於世間。

在菩薩不退轉的語境中,「求聲聞道、辟支佛道人」被列為不能破壞、折伏阿惟越致菩薩之心者;經文並藉魔化比丘勸菩薩即身取苦盡、證須陀洹乃至阿羅漢果,顯示若以似道法或遮道法誘使菩薩轉離一切種智,即非其所應隨從。此處不是否定聲聞果位本身,而是著重阿惟越致菩薩不被勸轉、不改其求阿耨多羅三藐三菩提之志。

本經又從修行者關係說及「求聲聞道家」與菩薩:若行菩薩道者與求聲聞道者諍鬥,魔便認為菩薩遠離薩婆若;而菩薩與聲聞人因諍鬥、瞋恚、罵詈所得之罪,經文亦說可由改悔等而得出。此處所關切的是諍鬥如何妨礙菩薩趣向一切種智,並非對聲聞人作抽象判定。

最後,本經以「道、非道」明辨菩薩所行:聲聞道、辟支佛道「非菩薩道」,一切智道纔是菩薩摩訶薩道;般若波羅蜜之興,正為顯示何者是道、何者非道,且經文說般若波羅蜜不受聲聞、辟支佛地。這是依菩薩目標所作的路向區分,說明聲聞道雖為三乘之一,卻不是菩薩趣向一切智的本道。就多譯名歸一而言,本經正文實際使用「聲聞乘」與「聲聞道」,並以「辟支佛」而非「緣覺」相對稱。

大方廣佛華嚴經(八十華嚴)T0279 · 華嚴部

《大方廣佛華嚴經》論及聲聞乘,主要從以下幾個方面展開:

一、世間少有趨向聲聞乘者。經中明言「一切世界諸群生,少有欲求聲聞乘,求獨覺者轉復少,趣大乘者甚難遇」,強調聲聞乘行者於世間尚屬少數,而大乘行者更為難遇,能信受華嚴法門者尤為稀有。

二、聲聞乘的成因與特質。經由十善業道的上品,以智慧修習,但因「心狹劣故,怖三界故,闕大悲故,從他聞聲而解了故」,遂成聲聞乘。此處明確標舉「從他聞聲而解了」為聲聞乘的核心特質,即依賴他人之教聲而起解,不同於獨覺乘之自悟,亦不同於菩薩乘之具足大悲、發廣大願。

三、聲聞乘與如來音聲的關係。經以如來音聲開示眾生,其中第二種音聲示以「涅槃寂靜,無為安樂,遠離熾然,消諸熱惱」之理,令眾生「於聲聞乘得隨順音聲忍」。又言「聲聞乘者,隨他語解,智慧狹劣」,再次強調其「隨他語解」之性,並指出其智慧狹劣、劣於獨覺乘與大乘。經復以天鼓之喻,說如來音聲令無數眾生「各於自乘而求出離」,其中即包括「或修聲聞乘」者。

四、聲聞乘作為菩薩莊嚴道之一。經列菩薩十種莊嚴道,其第二種為「智慧現前,入聲聞道,不以此道而取出離」。即菩薩雖能現前入於聲聞之道,卻不以此道作為究竟出離,顯示菩薩之方便善巧與聲聞行者之志趣迥異。

五、聲聞乘行者的局限。經中詳述諸大聲聞因何不能見如來大神變之因緣,謂其「依聲聞乘而出離故,成就聲聞道,滿足聲聞行,安住聲聞果,於無有諦得決定智,常住實際究竟寂靜,遠離大悲,捨於眾生,住於自事」。此處「遠離大悲、捨於眾生、住於自事」乃聲聞乘行者之根本局限,故雖在逝多林中對佛而不能見如來廣大神力,以其「捨一切智,無明瞖瞙覆其眼故,不曾種植薩婆若地諸善根故」。

六、聲聞乘眾生的存在。經中亦言及「信樂聲聞乘眾生」環繞比丘尼聽法,以及佛陀會中「有諸眾生依聲聞乘而得出離,其聲聞眾過去修習一切善根,及其所得種種智慧」皆悉了知,顯示聲聞乘於佛化範圍內自成一類,而菩薩以三昧解脫之力亦能遍知其修行因緣。

本經論聲聞乘所用術語包括「聲聞乘」、「聲聞道」、「聲聞行」、「聲聞果」、「聲聞」等名稱,並以「從他聞聲而解了」、「隨他語解」標示其本質特徵,以「智慧狹劣」標示其能力界限,以「隨順音聲忍」標示其修行位次,以「遠離大悲、捨於眾生、住於自事」標示其根本局限。

Related