Dharma · AI Companion

觸食

sparśāhāra

由根境识和合之触滋养身心。AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ II · emptinessInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

四食为缘生因果重(第1)所教之有情相续法;般若重释为食性本空(第2)。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

這個概念在說什麼 (What This Concept Is Saying)

In Buddhist doctrine, life is not a static object that exists independently; it is an ongoing process sustained by continuous feeding. This process is categorized under the framework of the "Four Nutriments" (四食 / *catvāro 'āhārāḥ*)—four distinct forms of nourishment that maintain existence, sustain living beings, and fuel the growth of the "Four Great Elements" (四大 / *mahābhūta*: earth, water, fire, and wind). While physical food (麤摶食 / *kavaḍīkārāhāra*) nourishes the physical body, the second nutriment, Contact-Nutriment (觸食 / *sparśa-āhāra*; also referred to as 細觸食), nourishes the mental and experiential continuity of sentient beings.

To understand Contact-Nutriment, one must first understand what "Contact" (觸 / *sparśa*) means in classical Buddhist psychology. Contact is not merely physical touch. It is the precise moment when three factors converge: 1. A sense organ (六入處 / *ṣaḍāyatana*—eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, or mind). 2. A corresponding sense object (六境 / *ṣaḍviṣaya*—form, sound, odor, taste, tangible object, or mental phenomenon). 3. The corresponding sense consciousness (六識 / *ṣaḍvijñāna*).

When these three meet, "Contact" occurs. When this sensory collision acts as a sustaining force that feeds psychological momentum and drives experiential continuity, it is called Contact-Nutriment (觸食).

1. Classical Source Nuances and Taxonomy

In the canonical texts, the presentation of Contact-Nutriment offers subtle and complementary perspectives:

* **The *Dīrgha Āgama* (長阿含經) Perspective**: Here, the four nutriments are arranged in a specific order—Edible Food (摶、細滑食) first, Contact-Nutriment (觸食) second, Volitional/Mental Intent Nutriment (念食 / *manaḥsañcetanāhāra*) third, and Consciousness Nutriment (識食 / *vijñānāhāra*) fourth [10306]. In its cosmological categorization of life forms, the *Dīrgha Āgama* assigns specific primary nutriments to different realms of beings. In this strict taxonomy, it states: *"Which beings feed on Contact-Nutriment? Oviparous beings [egg-born beings, 卵生眾生] feed on Contact-Nutriment"* [10307]. This contrasts with human and desire-realm beings who primarily depend on coarse edible food, or formless-realm beings who rely on consciousness. * **The *Saṃyukta Āgama* (雜阿含經) Perspective**: Here, Contact-Nutriment (interchangeably termed 細觸食 or 觸食) is treated not merely as a specific creature's habit, but as a universal law of dependent origination applying across living existence [6058, 7930]. It occupies a critical position in the Twelve Links of Dependent Origination (十二因緣 / *dvādaśāṅga-pratītyasamutpāda*):

$$\text{Six Sense Bases (六入處)} \longrightarrow \text{Contact (觸/觸食)} \longrightarrow \text{Feeling (受)} \longrightarrow \text{Craving (愛)} \longrightarrow \text{Nutriment/Grasping (食/取)} \longrightarrow \text{Mass of Suffering (純大苦聚)}$$

The *Saṃyukta Āgama* points out that Contact-Nutriment originates from craving, relies on craving, and is generated by craving [6058]. When the six sense bases arise, contact arises; when contact arises, feeling (*vedanā*) arises, which feeds craving (*tṛṣṇā*), ultimately maintaining the cycle of birth, aging, illness, death, and sorrow [6058].

2. The Core Classical Metaphors

To prevent practitioners from romanticizing sensory experience, the *Saṃyukta Āgama* provides sharp, precise metaphors that must be understood in their strict, non-collapsed structures:

* The Metaphor of the Flayed Cow (生牛剝皮之喻): The *Saṃyukta Āgama* compares observing Contact-Nutriment to contemplating a live cow that has been completely skinned [6064]. If this flayed cow stands on the ground, ground insects feast on it; if it steps into water, aquatic creatures devour it; if it stays in the air, flying insects sting it; wherever it lies down or stands, dust, sand, thorns, and sharp grass torment its exposed flesh, leaving it in constant, excruciating agony [6064]. This metaphor illustrates the reality of sensory contact: our sense organs, unarmored by wisdom, are perpetually exposed to external impacts. Every contact brings friction. When a practitioner observes Contact-Nutriment through this lens, they achieve "thorough comprehension and abandonment" (斷知) of Contact-Nutriment [6064]. Once Contact-Nutriment is thoroughly understood and severed, the "Three Feelings" (三受: pleasant feeling / 樂受, painful feeling / 苦受, and neutral feeling / 不苦不樂受) are severed; when the three feelings are severed, craving loses its fuel, leading directly to the ultimate stage of liberation where "that which was to be done has been accomplished" (所作已作) [6064].

* The Metaphor of Sunlight without a Wall (日光無壁之喻) & Painting on the Void (虛空難畫之喻): Why does severing delight and craving for Contact-Nutriment lead to freedom? The sutra uses two vivid images. If sunlight shines from the east toward a western wall, the light lands on the wall. But if the wall is removed, the sunlight shines into empty space, unbound and unattached (照於虛空,無所攀緣) [6071]. Similarly, a painter can only apply colors onto a tangible wall or canvas; one cannot paint a picture upon empty, formless void (虛空難畫) [6073, 6075]. If a person harbors delight and craving (喜與貪) for Contact-Nutriment, consciousness finds a "wall" to land upon and grow (識住增長), plunging into Name-and-Form (名色) and perpetuating samsara [6068]. But if delight and craving are eradicated, consciousness has no footholds—like light in open space or a paintbrush in thin air—and the entire structure of suffering collapses [6068, 6071].


生活裡的走查 (A Walkthrough in Daily Life)

To see how Contact-Nutriment operates in modern life, let us trace a common, everyday scenario: scrolling through your smartphone in bed late at night after an exhausting workday.

``` [Sense Organ] Eye / Mind │ ├─► Collision (Sensory Input: Glowing Screen, Video Clips) │ │ [Contact / 觸] ──► [Contact-Nutriment / 觸食] (Psychological Stimulation Feeds the Mind) │ [Feeling / 受] (Micro-hits of novelty/pleasure) │ [Craving / 愛] ("Just one more short video...") │ [Sustained Samsaric Cycle] (Overstimulation, Sleep Deprivation, Restlessness) ```

Step 1: The Triad Convergence (Contact / 觸)

You lie in bed. Your physical stomach is full—you do not need edible food (摶食). Yet, your hand reaches for the phone. * Sense Bases (六入處): Your eyes (visual organ) and your mind-faculty (intent/attention). * Sense Objects (六境): The bright pixels on the screen, short video clips, notification badges. * Sense Consciousness (六識): Eye-consciousness processing color and movement; mind-consciousness interpreting news or social updates.

The moment these three meet, Contact (觸) occurs.

Step 2: From Contact to Nutriment (觸食)

Why can't you put the phone down even though your body is exhausted? Because your mind is hungry for Contact-Nutriment (觸食). Every swipe delivers a new burst of sensory data. This sensory collision acts as psychological sustenance—it "feeds" your brain, keeping mental activity active and preventing the mind from facing quietness or boredom. It is not physical calories, but sensory feeding.

Step 3: Generating Feeling and Fueling Craving (觸緣受,受緣愛)

* Feeling (受): The sensory contact immediately generates feelings. A funny clip generates a pleasant feeling (樂受); an annoying news headline generates a mildly painful/irritating feeling (苦受); a mundane post generates a neutral feeling (不苦不樂受). * Craving (愛) & Feeding (食): Even a neutral or mildly irritating feeling triggers a desire for *more* stimulation to avoid boredom. Craving arises. You keep swiping. The Contact-Nutriment feeds your mental restlessness, ensuring that consciousness remains "attached to the wall" (識住增長).

Step 4: Experiencing the "Flayed Cow"

By 1:00 AM, your eyes are dry, your head throbs, and your nervous system is overstimulated. You feel drained, yet wired. Here lies the exact mapping of the Flayed Cow Metaphor: Your sensory organs are completely exposed. Like the skinned cow bitten by flying insects and ground bugs, your eyes are raw from light particles, your ears are fatigued by sound, and your mind is agitated by endless streams of information. You are in friction with every byte of data, experiencing subtle mental torment—yet, driven by habit, you continue to feed on the very sensory contact that torments you.

Modern Mapping Errors to Avoid:

* Error 1: Mapping Contact-Nutriment only to physical touch (like a massage or a hug). * *Correction*: In Buddhist analysis, "Contact" encompasses all six senses. Looking at a screen, listening to music, or chasing mental thoughts are all forms of contact feeding Contact-Nutriment. * Error 2: Confusing Contact-Nutriment (觸食) with Mental Intent Nutriment (意思食). * *Correction*: Contact-Nutriment is the immediate sensory impact/stimulation arising from sense-object-consciousness convergence. Mental Intent Nutriment refers to deeper psychological drives, intentions, hopes, and subconscious desires planning for the future.


當代人為什麼需要它 (Why Modern People Need It)

Modern society has built an entire economy around the commercialization of Contact-Nutriment. We live in an Attention Economy, which is, in essence, a Contact-Nutriment Industry.

1. Unmasking "Digital Fatigue": Many contemporary people experience chronic exhaustion that sleeping does not fix. This is often because they confuse physical fatigue with sensory overfeeding. We may be physically inactive, but our sense faculties are constantly feeding on high-frequency Contact-Nutriment (push notifications, algorithmic feeds, short videos, ambient noise). Understanding Contact-Nutriment helps us recognize that our minds are suffering from "sensory indigestion."

2. Dialoguing with Neuroscience and AI Algorithms: * *Cognitive Science Perspective*: Modern neuroscience explains this cycle through dopamine loops, reward prediction errors, and sensory processing in the brain. Recommendation algorithms in social media and AI platforms are engineered specifically to optimize sensory feedback, keeping users locked in a continuous loop of stimulation. * *Buddhist Insight & Scientific Limitations*: Science accurately describes the neural pathways and neurochemical mechanisms of sensory processing. However, neuroscience largely views sensory input as neutral information processing or evolutionary adaptation. Buddhism goes deeper into the soteriological dimension: it identifies *sparśa-āhāra* as an existential trap—a mechanism rooted in ignorance (*avidyā*) and craving (*tṛṣṇā*) that binds consciousness to suffering. Science tells us *how* the brain reacts to stimulation; Buddhism shows us *how to free consciousness* from dependency on that stimulation.

3. Restoring the "Space without a Wall": When contemporary people understand the mechanism of Contact-Nutriment, they gain the ability to step back. Recognizing that sensory collisions are like insects biting a flayed cow allows one to stop chasing every pleasant stimulus and stop reacting to every unpleasant one. When delight and craving for sensory contact subside, consciousness stops clinging—like sunlight passing through void without hitting a wall—bringing genuine mental spaciousness and peace.


常見誤讀與澄清 (Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications)

* Misunderstanding 1: "To sever Contact-Nutriment, does one need to shut down all sense organs and avoid all sensory inputs?" * Clarification: No. Severing Contact-Nutriment (斷觸食) does not mean making oneself blind, deaf, or sensory-deprived, nor does it require living in a dark cave. The sutras explicitly state that what needs to be severed is "delight and craving" (喜與貪) toward contact [6068]. A liberated Arahant still sees colors and hears sounds; contact between sense organs and objects still occurs. However, because wisdom is present, contact no longer feeds craving, nor does it generate clinging. The sensory contact occurs, but it is no longer converted into "nutriment" that fuels samsaric continuity.

* Misunderstanding 2: "Is Contact-Nutriment unique only to egg-born animals (卵生眾生)?" * Clarification: This requires contextual clarification between different sutra lineages. As seen in the *Dīrgha Āgama*, when categorizing the primary or dominant survival modes across different realms of existence, contact-nutriment is specifically matched to oviparous beings [10307]. However, in the universal analytical framework of the *Saṃyukta Āgama*, Contact-Nutriment is one of the four essential nutriments that sustain all sentient beings (一切眾生皆以四食存) [6058, 7930]. Humans, animals, and devas all rely on Contact-Nutriment to sustain their psychological existence.

* Misunderstanding 3: "Is Contact-Nutriment just a poetic way of talking about emotional comfort?" * Clarification: While emotional comfort involves contact-nutriment, the concept in Buddhism is a precise ontological definition, not merely a poetic description. Contact-Nutriment is an active causal link in Dependent Origination. It directly conditions Feeling (受), which conditions Craving (愛), which drives Grasping (取) and Becoming (有), ultimately producing future rebirth and suffering. Treating it merely as a metaphor understates its crucial role in the mechanism of samsaric existence and liberation.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义

「触食」(sparśa-āhāra)是佛教经典中「四食」概念的重要组成部分,指众生借由感官与外境接触(触)而获得维持生命、长养四大的滋养作用。在佛教教义中,一切众生皆赖食而存,而触食作为四食之一,是维持生命存续、令其住世并摄受长养,或使四大(地、水、火、风)增长的重要因缘。在四食的顺序中,触食通常居于第二位。

二、 主要阐述

1. 触食的适用对象与食性划分: 根据《长阿含经》的论述,世间众生因其生命形态的不同,所食亦有所不同。在该经的特定脉络中,触食被明确关联为「卵生众生」所特有的生存滋养方式,经中以问答形式指出「何等众生触食?卵生众生触食。」。这与其他三种食(抟食、念食、识食)的适用对象形成了鲜明对比,例如人类及欲界诸天主要以「抟、细滑食」为食,地狱众生及无色天则以「识食」为食。

2. 触食的因缘生灭机制: 《杂阿含经》详细剖析了触食的因缘链条。触食并非孤立存在,而是以「爱」为因、为集、为生、为触的。具体而言,其生起与熄灭遵循十二因缘的连锁关系:「六入处」缘「触」,「触」缘「受」,「受」缘「爱」,而「爱」则集起「食」。若六入处集起,则触集起,进而导致受、爱、食的集起,最终引发未来世生、老、病、死、忧、悲、恼、苦等「纯大苦聚」的集起。反之,若六入处灭,则触、受、爱、食相继熄灭,从而使一切苦聚彻底消灭。

3. 触食的观修方法: 为了引导修行者断除对触食的执着,《杂阿含经》提出了著名的「生牛剥皮之喻」。经中比喻一头活牛被剥去皮肤,无论置身何处(地上、水中、空中),都会遭受地虫、水虫、飞虫的唼食与叮咬,并受到沙土尘埃的覆盖及草木针刺的折磨,常处于极度苦毒之中。修行者应当如是观察触食。若能作此观察,便能对触食达到「断知」(彻底了知并断除)。一旦触食被断知,则「三受」(苦受、乐受、不苦不乐受)亦随之断除;三受断除后,多闻圣弟子便达到了「所作已作」的无学解脱境界。

4. 断除触食贪喜的解脱意义: 《杂阿含经》强调,对触食等四食是否产生贪爱与喜乐,是决定生死轮回与解脱的关键。若对四食存有喜与贪,则会导致「识住增长」,进而入于名色、增长诸行与未来世的生存,最终集起纯大苦聚,并产生忧悲与尘垢。反之,若对四食无贪无喜,则「识不住、不增长」,不入名色,未来世的生老病死等苦聚便不会升起,亦无忧悲与尘垢。经中对此使用了多个生动的比喻: - 日光无壁之喻:如同日光从东方升起照向西壁,若没有西壁,日光便会「照于虚空,无所攀缘」;同样地,若对四食无贪无喜,识便无所攀缘与停留。 - 虚空难画之喻:如同画师无法在没有形质、不可见的虚空上着色作画,或者无法脱离物质色彩(离于色)来凭空粧画像;若对四食无贪无喜,识便失去了增长的依托,从而使苦聚熄灭。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异

在不同的经典部类中,对于「触食」这一概念的术语使用和具体指向存在细微的差异: 1. 术语形式的差异: 在《长阿含经》中,该概念统一被称为「触食」。而在《杂阿含经》中,则存在交替使用的现象,经文在某些章节中称其为「细触食」,而在其他章节中则简称为「触食」。 2. 适用对象的定位差异: 《长阿含经》对触食的定位非常具体,将其特别归属于「卵生众生」的食性。而《杂阿含经》则从更普遍的因缘法角度出发,将「触食」视为一切众生(或长养四大者)住世的四种共同食物之一,并未将其局限于卵生众生,而是强调其与「六入处」、「触」、「受」等十二因缘环节的普遍关联。

四、 与相关概念的关系

1. 与「四食」中其他三食的关系: 触食与「抟食」(或称「麤抟食」、「抟、细滑食」)、「意思食」(或称「念食」)、「识食」共同构成四食系统。在《长阿含经》中,这四食有着明确的顺序与对象划分,抟食为第一(适用于欲界人、天等),触食为第二(适用于卵生),念食为第三,识食为第四。 2. 与「十二因缘」及「三受」的关系: 在《杂阿含经》的因缘链条中,触食与「六入处」、「触」、「受」、「爱」紧密相连。六入处缘触,触缘受,受缘爱,爱集起食。同时,触食的断除直接关联到「三受」的断除。经中指出,若能断知触食,则苦受、乐受、不苦不乐受这「三受」亦随之断除,从而截断了向后发展为「爱」与「苦聚」的因缘通路。 3. 与「名色」及「识」的关系: 对触食的贪喜直接影响到「识」的停留与增长。若对触食有贪喜,则「识住增长」,并「入于名色」;若无贪喜,则「识不住、不增长」,「不入名色」,从而阻断了生死轮回的连锁反应。

五、 代表性原文引用

1. 《长阿含经》: - 「抟、细滑食为第一,触食为第二,念食为第三,识食为第四。」 - 「何等众生触食?卵生众生触食。」 2. 《杂阿含经》: - 「有四食资益众生,令得住世,摄受长养。何等为四?一者麤抟食,二者细触食,三者意思食,四者识食。」 - 「譬如活牛,生剥其皮,……若依地住,地虫所唼;若依水住,水虫所食;若依空住,飞虫所食;卧起之处,沙土尘坌,草木针刺,常处苦毒。如是,比丘!当观触食。观触食通达者,三受则断;三受断者,我说彼多闻圣弟子更无所作。」 - 「若于四食有喜有贪,识住增长,乃至纯大苦聚集。若于四食无喜无贪,识不住、不增长,乃至纯大苦聚灭。」

By SutraAI-generated

長阿含經T0001 · 阿含部

《長阿含經》於此段經文中,以「四食」框架總攝一切眾生之存養方式,觸食居其二。經云:「一切眾生以四食存。何謂為四?摶、細滑食為第一,觸食為第二,念食為第三,識食為第四。」 此處「摶、細滑食」合為第一食,即後世通稱之「段食」,本經以「摶食」與「細滑食」並舉稱之,為其獨特用語。觸食位列第二,與念食、識食依次排列,構成四食之完整序列。

關於觸食所攝之眾生,經文以問答體逐一判定:「何等眾生觸食?卵生眾生觸食。」 此即本經對觸食最核心之界定——觸食專屬於卵生眾生。與後世論書將觸食普遍定義為「根、境、識三和合生觸,由觸受用而長養身心」不同,《長阿含經》此處並未就觸食之生起機制(根境識和合)加以說明,而是逕以眾生類別(卵生)歸屬之,呈現出較為素樸的分類式表述。四食之中,摶食與細滑食廣說諸類眾生各別所食(閻浮提人飯麵魚肉、欝單曰人自然粳米、龍金翅鳥黿鼉魚鱉、諸天淨摶食等),觸食則僅以「卵生眾生觸食」一句了結,未再細分。

此外,經文敘及諸道眾生陰陽交會方式時,屢用「觸」字:閻浮提、拘耶尼、弗于逮、欝單曰人及龍、金翅鳥皆「身身相觸以成陰陽」,阿須倫與四天王、忉利天「身身相近,以氣成陰陽」,焰摩天「相近以成陰陽」,兜率天「執手成陰陽」,化自在天「熟視成陰陽」,他化自在天「暫視成陰陽」。此等「觸」雖非直接釋義觸食,然觸食之「觸」與身根接觸、感官交會之語義場相通,經文於同一脈絡中反覆使用「觸」「相近」等詞,顯示本經對「觸」之理解偏重身體層面之接觸與感通。

術語方面,本經有數項古譯特徵值得記錄:一、以「摶食」「細滑食」稱後世通譯之「段食」(麤段食與細滑食),不作「段食」;二、以「念食」稱後世通譯之「意思食」;三、以「阿須倫」稱「阿修羅」;四、以「泥梨」稱地獄(「泥梨初識生」);五、以「弗于逮」稱東勝身洲、以「拘耶尼」稱西牛貨洲、以「欝單曰」稱北俱盧洲。此皆後秦佛陀耶舍共竺佛念譯本之早期音譯與意譯形式。

總之,《長阿含經》論觸食,採簡明列舉體:先總標「一切眾生以四食存」,再逐類分判各眾生所食歸屬。觸食之界定僅「卵生眾生觸食」一句,未展開根境識和合之因緣分析,亦未涉及觸食與受、愛、取之觀照修習,與阿毘達磨諸論之細密詮釋形成對照。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》論觸食,始終將觸食置於「四食」整體框架中,未對觸食單獨展開分析。經文列舉四食的固定用語為「摶食、觸食、意思食、識食」,其中觸食即由根境識和合之觸而為資養義,經中未另立異名,逕稱「觸食」。

關於四食之功能,經文有兩種表述:一為「資益眾生,令得住世攝受長養」,一為「長養眾生,四大增長攝受」及「眾生安立,饒益攝受」。前者側重存在之維持與延續,後者側重四大色身之增長,觸食皆含攝其中。

本經論觸食之核心機制,在於「喜貪」與「識住」之關聯。經云:「於此四食有喜有貪,則識住增長,識住增長故,入於名色,入名色故,諸行增長,行增長故,當來有增長,當來有增長故,生、老、病、死、憂、悲、惱、苦集,如是純大苦聚集。」 此處以十二因緣式逆觀,將四食(含觸食)之貪喜視為識住增長之條件,輾轉引生名色、行、當來有,終至純大苦聚集。反之,「若於四食無貪無喜,無貪無喜故,識不住、不增長」,則不入名色、行不增長、當來有不生長,「純大苦聚滅」。此即觸食作為流轉與還滅之關鍵環節:觸本身非過患,於觸食起貪喜方為繫縛之因。

經中另以「有貪有喜,則有憂悲、有塵垢;無貪無喜,則無憂悲,亦無塵垢」 作簡要對舉,以「塵垢」喻煩惱染著,為本經論四食貪過之獨特用語。

本經善用譬喻說明識與四食之關係。其一為「樓閣宮殿」喻:日出東方光照西壁,喻識於四食有貪則有所住;若無西壁則「應照虛空,無所攀緣」,喻於四食無貪無喜則「識無所住」。其二為「畫師」喻:畫師集種種彩色欲粧畫虛空而不能,以「虛空者,非色、無對、不可見」故,喻無貪之識無可攀緣處;反之以畫師粧畫於色則能成,喻有貪則識住增長。此二喻皆從「無所緣」角度闡明離貪後識之寂止,觸食在其中作為所緣之一而攝於四食總說。

此外,經中將四食與四不壞淨(於佛、法、僧不壞淨,聖戒成就)並舉,稱四不壞淨為「福德潤澤,為安樂食」,又稱「福德潤澤、善法潤澤,安樂食」。此處以「安樂食」對舉四食,暗示四食(含觸食)為世間長養之食,四不壞淨則為出世福德之食,二者同以「食」為喻而層次有別。

綜觀本經,觸食之術語形式固定為「觸食」,與「摶食」「意思食」「識食」並列;論述重心不在觸食自身之定義,而在於對四食整體之貪喜如何引生識住、名色、行、當來有之流轉鏈,以及離貪後識無所住之還滅。經中特有用語包括「識住增長」「當來有」「純大苦聚集/純大苦聚滅」「塵垢」「無所攀緣」等,皆為本經論觸食相關義理之標誌性表述。

阿毘達磨俱舍論T1558 · 毘曇部

《阿毘達磨俱舍論》以「四食」框架安立觸食。論先引經:「世尊自悟一法正覺正說,謂諸有情一切無非由食而住」,食有四種——段、觸、思、識。觸食之體性,論明言「觸謂三和所生諸觸」,即根、境、識三和合所生之觸。此定義承接前文對觸之辨析:觸有六種,「所謂眼觸乃至意觸」,皆由「根、境、識三和合故有別觸生」。關於觸之體性,論中並列兩師異說:有說「三和即名為觸」,引經「如是三法聚集和合說名為觸」為證;有說觸是「別法與心相應,三和所生說名為觸」,引六六法門經中根境識外別說六觸為證。論主歸結「對法者說有別觸」。

觸食之功能,論以偈「前二益此世,所依及能依,後二於當有,引及起如次」總攝。長行釋曰:「言能依者,謂心心所,觸食於彼能為資益」——觸食所滋養者非色根大種,而是心心所法;段食益「所依」之有根身,觸食益「能依」之心心所,二者「於已生有資益功能最為殊勝」。思食引當有、識食起當有,「後二如生母,生未生故」;段、觸「如養母,養已生故」。

觸食之界繫與有漏性:論云觸、思、識三食「唯有漏,通三界皆有」。所以不通無漏者,「能資諸有是其食義,無漏修生為滅諸有」,又經說四食「能令部多有情安住,及能資益諸求生者」,無漏不然,故非食體。論復以四句分別:「頗有觸等為緣,資益諸根大種而非食耶?有,謂異地無漏觸等」——異地觸及無漏觸雖能資益而不名食。

觸食之普遍性:論斷言「五趣四生皆具四食」,地獄中熱鐵丸等雖能損害而「暫時解除飢渴,得食相故亦名為食」。又論以思食持身之例(飢世二子望灰囊延命、海商望沫疑岸)說明諸有漏法皆滋長有,而世尊「就勝說四無失」。

觸與受之關係亦為本論特色:六觸生六受,「眼觸所生受至意觸所生受」,前五為身受、意觸所生為心受。毘婆沙師許觸受「俱時起,觸受展轉俱有因故」;有說觸後方有受生,「第三剎那緣觸生受」。此辯涉及觸食資益心心所之機制。

術語方面,本論始終以「觸」稱此食,不另立異名;觸食之定義用語為「三和所生諸觸」,六觸則稱「眼觸乃至意觸」。論中「部多」指已生有情,「求生」指中有,皆為本論特有之釋詞。

Related