Dharma · AI Companion

識食

vijñānāhāra

维系有情生命相续的识作用AI-generated

Type ViewDifficulty IntermediateTruth-level span I · dependent arisingInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

四食中识食属阿含缘起法数,初转即完整教授(1);性空对四食唯作遮破,依 PP3 不升 究竟层。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Is About

In the Buddhist path of liberation, life is not an isolated, fixed entity, but a process driven by causes and conditions—one that ceaselessly burns and continues. To keep the flame of life from going out, it must be constantly "fed." The Buddha, in the scriptures, collectively called the forces that sustain life's existence and propel the cycle of birth-and-death the "four nutriments" (四食, catvāra āhārāḥ):

1. 麤抟食 (kabaliṅkārāhāra, "coarse nutriment"; also rendered 抟食 or 细滑食): the material food and drink of daily life that nourishes the physical body; 2. 触食 (sparśāhāra, "contact as nutriment"; also rendered 细触食): the sensory and psychological contact produced when the sense faculties, sense objects, and consciousness meet, nourishing emotions and feelings; 3. **意思食 (manasañcetanāhāra, "volitional nutriment"; rendered 念食, "thought-nutriment," in the *Dīrghāgama*): the intention, hope, and volitional activity directed toward goals, driving life forward in grasping; 4. 识食 (vijñānāhāra, "consciousness as nutriment")**: the subject-consciousness that discerns and identifies, serving as the deepest spiritual food [10306, 6058].

In one sentence: 識食 (vijñānāhāra, "consciousness as nutriment") is the most fundamental spiritual food by which life maintains its present existence, nourishes the growth of the sense faculties, and—at death—summons the future life into being, keeping the chain of life unbroken [10306, 6058, 6060].

1. The Core Function of 識食: Summoning Future Existence and Continuing the Succession

In the *Saṃyuktāgama* (《杂阿含经》), the Buddha gave an extremely precise definition of the nature of 識食 (vijñānāhāra):

"能招未来有,令相续生" [6060] *"It can summon future existence and cause the succession to continue to arise."*

Here, "food" (食) means more than "eating one's fill"—it is an existential power of "appropriating, nourishing, and sustaining." Nourished by the first three nutriments (material food, sensory contact, and volition), consciousness (識, vijñāna) continuously discerns, grasps, and binds itself to the outer and inner worlds. Consciousness is not a floating spirit; it must "have a dwelling-place." When consciousness develops "craving" and "delight" (有贪有喜, with craving and delight) toward things, it projects and takes root in specific objects—this is the classic notion of "the abiding and growth of consciousness" (識住增長) [6068].

Once 識住增長 occurs, consciousness further "enters name-and-form" (入於名色; 名 referring to the mental, 色 to the physical body), thereby triggering volitional formations (行, saṃskāra) and "future existence" (當來有), ultimately leading to the arising of birth, aging, sickness, death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, and vexation—the "entire mass of suffering" (純大苦聚) [6068, 6070, 6071].

2. The Support of Special Modes of Existence: Hell and the Formless Realms

Among the distribution of the four nutriments, although all beings depend on the four for survival, beings in different realms have markedly different emphases. The *Dīrghāgama* (《长阿含经》) specifically states:

"何等识食?地狱众生及无色天,是名识食。" [10307] *"What is consciousness as nutriment? The hell-beings and the formless heavens—this is called consciousness as nutriment."*

* Hell-beings (泥梨, naraka): In the extremes of torment, the physical body (色法) is utterly depleted or destroyed in an instant, yet the consciousness of suffering (泥梨初識, the first consciousness of the hell-realm) induced by past heavy evil karma is extremely intense. This fierce "karmic consciousness of guilt" becomes the only subtle support sustaining their hellish existence without extinction [10307]. * Beings of the Formless Realms (無色天, ārūpyadhātu): They have completely transcended the material body (無色), lacking coarse nutriment and material sensory contact. They rely entirely on extremely subtle, deep mental waves of consciousness (such as the consciousness of the sphere of infinite space, the consciousness of the sphere of infinite consciousness, etc.) to sustain their extremely long celestial lives [10307].

This reveals a profound truth: even if the physical body and external matter are stripped away, as long as the deep grasping at "existence" in consciousness (識食) is not cut off, life remains imprisoned in the net of saṃsāra.

3. Scriptural Formulations and Translation Variations

In Chinese canonical translations, the names and renderings of the four nutriments differ slightly, reflecting the distinctive diction of classical translators:

* 《长阿含经》 (Dīrghāgama, T0001): names the four nutriments "抟、细滑食为第一,触食为第二,念食为第三,识食为第四" [10306]; renders "hell" as 泥梨, and uses "泥梨初识生" to describe the arising of the first moment of hell-consciousness at death due to evil karma, followed by the succession of name-and-form and the six sense-bases [10307]. * 《杂阿含经》 (Saṃyuktāgama, T0099): names the four nutriments "麤抟食、细触食、意思食、识食" [6058].

Whatever the translation variations, the core meaning is identical: 識 (consciousness) is the fundamental basis for the arising of name-and-form (名色) and the six sense-bases (六入, ṣaḍāyatana) [10307, 6065].

4. Three Classical Similes for Consciousness Abiding Nowhere

Since 識住增長 brings endless saṃsāra and the mass of suffering, what then is the state of liberation? The *Saṃyuktāgama* uses three exquisite similes to describe the state of the noble one in whom "consciousness abides nowhere" (識無所住)—no longer clinging or taking root:

1. The Simile of Sunlight and the Wall: Just as sunlight streaming through a window from the east will fall upon a wall if there is a wall to the west, yet if there is no western wall (no craving as an object of clinging), the sunlight shines directly "upon empty space, clinging to nothing" [6071]. Consciousness loses its foothold for clinging, no longer takes root, and no longer nourishes the fruits of suffering. 2. The Simile of Painting on Empty Space: Just as the most skillful painter can paint on walls and canvases, yet cannot paint on colorless, intangible, invisible empty space [6073]. When the practitioner's mind, like space, is free from craving and attachment, karma and the mass of suffering cannot project the picture of saṃsāra into consciousness. 3. The Simile of No Painting Without Form: A painter must depend on pigments and canvas (colors and material media/色) to paint [6075]. This shows that consciousness cannot exist independently of the mental and physical causes and conditions (form, feeling, perception, volition); once craving and delight toward these conditions are cut off, consciousness loses its ground of support.

5. The Harsh Simile of Contemplating 識食 and the Path of Liberation

To alert practitioners to the danger of 識食, the scriptures offer a shocking simile: contemplating 識食 should be like observing a criminal subjected to the king's punishment—pierced day and night by "three hundred spear-thrusts of suffering" [6065].

Why should the consciousness-nutriment that sustains life be seen as being pierced by three hundred sharp spears? Because every act of consciousness discerning, grasping, and identifying with phenomena plants the seed of future suffering. If one can examine 識食 with such profound vigilance, one attains "the knowledge of cutting off consciousness-as-nutriment" (識食斷知)—a thorough understanding and eradication of craving for consciousness-as-nutriment [6065].

"若识食断知,则名色断知。名色断知者,多闻圣弟子于上更无所作。" [6065] *"If consciousness-as-nutriment is known and cut off, then name-and-form is known and cut off. For the learned noble disciple in whom name-and-form is known and cut off, there is nothing further to be done."*

In the path of liberation, the cutting off of 識食 has a decisive, discontinuous power. Consciousness no longer takes root; name-and-form (the union of the mental and the physical) loses its nutriment and ceases; with name-and-form extinguished, the cycle of birth-and-death comes to a complete end. This is the ultimate arhat-fruit (阿羅漢果) of "what was to be done is done" (所作已作) [6065].


A Walk-Through in Daily Life

To prevent 識食 from becoming an abstract, mystical term, we can walk through it using psychological and life scenarios that contemporary people know intimately, step by step along the ladder of the four nutriments (四食), and see how 識食 secretly "feeds" our suffering every day.

Scenario: "Scrolling and the Anxiety Storm" After Late-Night Overtime

* Level One: 麤抟食 (physical nourishment) At 1 a.m., you finish overtime and return home, feeling physically drained. You order a greasy, sugary late-night snack. The food goes down, blood sugar rises, and the body receives physical energy. This is 麤抟食. * Level Two: 触食 (sensory nourishment) While eating, you open your phone and start scrolling through short videos. A funny sketch makes you laugh, a controversial news item angers you, a beautiful photo makes you envious. The eye-faculty meets the screen's forms, giving rise to eye-consciousness; the three together produce "contact" (觸, sparśa), bringing a continuous stream of psychological stimulation and emotional fluctuation. You feel a sense of "fullness" in the ups and downs of emotion—this is 触食. * Level Three: 意思食/念食 (nourishment of volition and goals) You close the videos, and suddenly remember next week's performance review and mortgage pressure. You begin planning in your head: "I must get promoted. I must land that project next year, or I'll be left behind by the times!" This expectation of the future, resolve, anxiety, and sense of crisis drives you to be wide awake, thoughts racing. This mental tension driven by volition and goals is 意思食. * Level Four: 識食 (existential binding and summoning) (This is where most people map it wrong!) Many people think the "specific thoughts" in their heads are 識食. Wrong! Specific thoughts belong to the perception aggregate (想蘊, saṃjñāskandha); future planning belongs to the volitional formations aggregate (行蘊, saṃskāraskandha)/意思食. The real 識食 occurs at a far subtler, more fundamental level: In the midst of your anxiety, there is a subject that clearly knows and perceives (識), quietly recognizing and identifying "the self that might fail" or "the self that must succeed" as 「I」. You feel intense craving and fear about the continuation of this "I" (有貪有喜—with craving and delight). In that moment, consciousness seizes the object "career crisis," and "識住增長" (consciousness abides and grows) [6068]. Immediately, this subtle grasping of consciousness "enters name-and-form": your heart begins to pound violently, your stomach contracts (色), and your inner world is filled with anxiety and unease (名) [6068]. This chain reaction not only creates a psychological "hell" for you tonight (just as hell-beings sustain their hellish existence with the consciousness of suffering) [10307], but also, at a deep level, stealthily constructs your future character, behavioral patterns, and even the trajectory of your future life—this is "能招未来有,令相续生" (summoning future existence and continuing the succession) [6060].

You cling to "my future" in the dead of night, and consciousness takes root in that illusory picture of suffering. This is the 識食 we unconsciously engage in every day.


Why Contemporary People Need It

Contemporary society is an era of "attention economy" and "identity anxiety" erupting at full force. More than in any previous era, we are prone to deep mental exhaustion, and the concept of 識食 offers contemporary people a scalpel for dissecting their spiritual predicaments:

1. Deciphering the puzzle of "the more I rest, the more tired I am" Many people find that even on vacation—eating well (麤抟食 sufficient), not working (no physical exertion)—they lie in bed scrolling their phones all day and still feel profoundly empty and exhausted at night. Because although you have stopped physical labor, your senses (触食), your desires (意思食), and your anxious grasping at self-identity (識食) have been furiously consuming and feeding themselves all along. Consciousness, in its restlessness, ceaselessly clings and takes root, keeping the spiritual life in a state of extreme agitation and burning. 2. Seeing through the prison of "self-identification" Much of contemporary suffering comes from over-feeding a certain "self-image." Algorithms keep recommending information that matches your preferences, forcibly consolidating your worldview and self-identity. Consciousness (識) keeps confirming in these mirrors of information, "This is me," "That is what I hate," and thus 識住增長 [6068]. The concept of 識食 warns us: the stubborn "self-consciousness" you forcibly maintain is precisely the source of your unceasing suffering. 3. Comparison and boundary with contemporary science/AI experience * Neuroscience perspective: Contemporary neuroscience can observe through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) the activation of the default mode network (DMN) during anxiety or self-reflection—this closely matches the psychophysical linkage when "consciousness enters name-and-form." But scientific research stops at "mapping physiological electrical signals to brain regions" (which falls within the category of 色法 and part of 名法); it cannot answer why life possesses the subjective power of grasping, nor can it resolve the beyond-birth-and-death problem of "summoning future existence" [6060]. * AI/algorithm comparison: AI can process extremely complex recognition (想蘊) and logical inference (行蘊), but AI has no "craving and delight" or "grasping" toward its own sense of existence. Therefore, AI does not produce 識食, nor does it feel suffering. Human suffering lies in the fact that, while processing information, we inject intense craving and existential grasping into it.


Common Misreadings and Clarifications

To fully grasp the doctrinal boundaries of 識食, three of the most common misreadings among contemporary people must be clarified:

Misreading One: "Since 識食 summons rebirth, doesn't that mean there is an eternal, imperishable 'soul' eating this food and circulating through saṃsāra?"

* Clarification: This is the classic view of eternalism (常見, śāśvatadṛṣṭi, the view that there is a fixed soul). In the *Saṃyuktāgama*, when someone asked the Buddha "Who eats this consciousness?" or "Who experiences feeling/craving/grasping/existence?", the Buddha explicitly denied and refuted it [6060]. The Buddha emphasized: there is no substantial sovereign agent (a self/soul) eating 識食. 識食 itself is a dynamic chain that arises and ceases depending on causes and conditions: from "contact" (觸) there is "feeling" (受, vedanā); from "feeling" there is "craving" (愛, tṛṣṇā); from "craving" there is the appropriation of the four nutriments [6058]. Life is like a flame—the fire of one moment ignites the fire of the next; between them there is only the continuation of causes and conditions ("令相續生"), and no fixed, unchanging "igniter" or "soul" is to be found anywhere [6060].

Misreading Two: Reducing 識食 to specific "brain thoughts," "brain waves," or "logical thinking"

* Clarification: Within the precise definitions of the five aggregates (五蘊, pañcaskandha) and the four nutriments: * The physiological structure of the brain and its electrical signals belong to the form aggregate (色蘊, rūpaskandha; the pigments and canvas in the simile of no painting without form) [6075]; * Extracting concepts and labeling belongs to the perception aggregate (想蘊, saṃjñāskandha); * Volition, choice, and planning belong to the volitional formations aggregate (行蘊, saṃskāraskandha)/意思食; * 識 (vijñāna) is the deepest-level subjective awareness and grasping power that can clearly perceive, bind to objects, and spans past and future [6060]. One must not narrow the spiritual power that runs through the chain of birth-and-death in Buddhism (識) into mere electrochemical brain reactions in a materialist framework.

Misreading Three: Thinking that "cutting off 識食 / consciousness abiding nowhere" means becoming a "vegetable," "completely insensate," or "brain-dead"

* Clarification: Many people hear "consciousness does not abide, does not grow," "識食斷知" [6065, 6068], and mistakenly think that practice is about eliminating consciousness entirely, becoming like wood or stone, devoid of awareness. This is a profound misunderstanding of the state of liberation. The classic "simile of sunlight and the wall" makes it very clear: when there is no wall, the sunlight does not disappear—it simply "shines upon empty space, clinging to nothing" [6071]. Cutting off craving for 識食 is not eliminating awareness itself, but thoroughly cutting off the "craving, delight, attachment, and grasping" toward objects deep within awareness [6068]. The noble one still perceives the world with utter clarity (consciousness remains), but his consciousness is like sunlight shining in empty space, like a brush painting in space—it no longer takes root in any defilement or self-identification [6071, 6073]. Because it "abides nowhere," name-and-form no longer grows, the entire mass of suffering is utterly extinguished, and the ultimately secure state of liberation is attained [6065, 6068].

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、 定义与核心要义 识食(vijñānāhāra)是佛教“四食”之一,指以“识”作为维持众生生命存在、资益诸根增长,并招引未来生命相续受生的精神之食。在佛教经典中,一切众生皆依食而存,而识食作为四食之一,具有令众生住世、摄受长养以及推动生命流转的关键作用。

二、 主要阐述 在《长阿含经》与《杂阿含经》中,对“识食”的性质、作用、适用对象以及如何通过修行断除对它的贪爱,进行了多角度的深入阐述: 1. 生命维持与特定适用对象:在经典中,识食是维持特定众生生命的核心要素。《长阿含经》指出,地狱众生以及无色界的诸天众生,均是以“识食”来维持生命与诸根增长的。 2. 招引未来有与生命相续:《杂阿含经》阐明,识食的核心功能在于“能招未来有,令相续生”。它并非由一个实体的主宰者所支配,而是依因缘而生起。四食(包括识食)皆以“爱”为因、为集、为生、为触,而爱又依“受”、“触”、“六入处”等因缘链条依次生起。 3. 贪喜、住著与苦聚的集起:众生若对四食产生“有贪有喜”,就会导致“识住增长”并“入于名色”,进而使诸行与当来有不断增长,最终导致生老病死等纯大苦聚的集起,带来忧悲与尘垢。反之,若对四食“无贪无喜”,则“识不住、不增长”,不入名色,从而使纯大苦聚彻底熄灭。 4. 识无所住的比喻:《杂阿含经》通过三个生动的比喻来形容“识无所住”的解脱状态:一是“日光无壁喻”,如同日光射入东窗,若无西壁等障碍物,光便无所照,而是照于虚空、无所攀缘;二是“虚空难画喻”,如同画师无法在无色、无对、不可见的虚空中作画;三是“离色无画喻”,如同画师无法脱离彩色与画布等物质媒介(色)来凭空作画。 5. 识食的观察与断除:修行者应当将观察“识食”视同罪犯遭受国王惩罚、昼夜经受“三百矛苦觉”般极端的痛苦。若能如是观察,就能对识食达到“断知”;一旦“识食断知”,则“名色断知”,多闻圣弟子便能达到“所作已作”的解脱境界。

三、 不同部类与译本的表述差异 1. 四食的名称与顺序: - 《长阿含经》中,四食的完整名称与顺序为:“抟、细滑食为第一,触食为第二,念食为第三,识食为第四”,或简称为“抟食、触食、念食、识食”。 - 《杂阿含经》中,四食的名称则表述为“麤抟食、细触食、意思食、识食”或简称为“抟食、触食、意思食、识食”。其中,《长阿含经》的“念食”在《杂阿含经》中对应为“意思食”。 2. 地狱的译名与投生表述: - 《长阿含经》将地狱译为“泥梨”,并在描述地狱众生投生时使用“泥梨初识生”这一特定表述。

四、 与相关概念的关系 1. 与名色、六入的关系:在生命流转中,识是名色与六入生起的根本。如《长阿含经》所述,众生因恶业命终后,“此后识灭,泥梨初识生,因识有名色,因名色有六入”。《杂阿含经》也指出,识食的断除直接导致名色的断除(“识食断知,则名色断知”)。 2. 与四大及四不坏净的对比:识食等四食与“四大”的增长密切相关。《杂阿含经》还将这四种维持生命存在的物质与精神之食,与另一组“福德润泽、善法润泽、安乐食”(即“于佛不坏净、于法不坏净、于僧不坏净、圣戒成就”的四不坏净)进行了对比。

五、 代表性原文引用 1. 《长阿含经》:“一切众生以四食存。何等为四?一者抟、细滑食,二者触食,三者念食,四者识食。” 2. 《长阿含经》:“何等识食?地狱众生及无色天,是名识食。” 3. 《长阿含经》:“若有众生身行恶,口言恶,意念恶,身坏命终,此后识灭,泥梨初识生,因识有名色,因名色有六入。” 4. 《杂阿含经》:“彼识食何等相?谓能招未来有,令相续生。” 5. 《杂阿含经》:“若于四食有贪有喜,有贪有喜故,识住增长。识住增长故,入于名色。” 6. 《杂阿含经>:“譬如日光自东窗入,照于西壁。……若无西壁,……照于虚空,无所攀缘。” 7. 《杂阿含经》:“若识食断知,则名色断知。名色断知者,多闻圣弟子于上更无所作。”

By SutraAI-generated

長阿含經T0001 · 阿含部

《長阿含經》論識食,置於「四食」框架之中。經中佛告比丘:「一切眾生以四食存」,所列四名依次為「摶、細滑食」「觸食」「念食」「識食」,識食居第四。此處術語值得注意:經文以「摶、細滑食」合稱第一食,而非後世常見的「段食」或單稱「摶食」;「細滑食」即觸食之異名,經中將二者並舉為一,觸食則另立為第二,名目分合與他經有別。

關於識食所攝眾生,經文以問答體明示:「何等識食?地獄眾生及無色天,是名識食。」 即識食唯攝二類有情——地獄(泥梨)眾生與無色界天眾生。此二類眾生或無段食可資(地獄苦迫無物可食),或無色身不須段觸(無色天無物質身),故唯以識為食而得相續存立。經文並未對識食之作用機制另加定義,僅以所攝眾生界定之,筆法極為簡要。

與四食說相銜接,經文又述各類眾生之食相差別:閻浮提人、拘耶尼人、弗于逮人以飯麵魚肉為摶食、衣服洗浴為細滑食;欝單曰人食自然粳米;龍、金翅鳥食黿鼉魚鱉;阿須倫及六欲天食淨摶食;「自上諸天以禪定喜樂為食」;卵生眾生觸食;另有眾生「因念食得存,諸根增長,壽命不絕」。此段層層鋪排,至識食則僅以地獄、無色天一句收束,顯示識食在四食中屬最微細、最難見之一類。

經末更以緣起鏈說明識與生命相續之關係:「若有眾生身行惡,口言惡,意念惡,身壞命終,此後識滅,泥梨初識生,因識有名色,因名色有六入。」 此處「後識滅」與「初識生」前後相續,正是識食維繫有情流轉之具體寫照——識非斷滅,前識方滅、後識即生,由此而有名色、六入之展開。經文用「泥梨」稱地獄,用「阿須倫」稱阿修羅,皆為本經特有之譯語形式。

總之,《長阿含經》論識食有三層:一、在四食中列為第四,與摶細滑食、觸食、念食並舉;二、以所攝眾生(地獄、無色天)界定其範圍;三、以「後識滅—初識生—因識有名色」之緣起敘事顯示識食維繫相續之義。全經未對識食另立專論,而是散見於四食總說與眾生差別之中,用語質樸,不作進一步之義理開展。

雜阿含經T0099 · 阿含部

《雜阿含經》以「四食」框架論述識食,將其列為第四食,與「麤摶食」(又稱「摶食」)、「細觸食」(又稱「觸食」)、「意思食」並列,總說「四食資益眾生,令得住世攝受長養」。經中對識食的論述有以下幾個面向:

一、緣起問答中的識食。比丘頗求那問「誰食此識」,佛不許有「食識者」,將問題轉向因緣:「何因緣故有識食?」答曰:「能招未來有,令相續生,有有故有六入處,六入處緣觸。」此後觸、受、愛、取、有、生、老死皆以因緣相續說,不立主體。

二、觀察識食之喻與斷知次第。佛以國王防邏者捉捕劫盜、受三百矛苦覺晝夜苦痛為喻,教比丘觀察識食。觀成則「識食斷知,識食斷知者,名色斷知,名色斷知者,多聞聖弟子於上更無所作,所作已作故」。此處識食斷知直接連於名色斷知,為本經特有的修觀次第表述。

三、識住增長與純大苦聚集。經中反覆闡明:「於此四食有喜有貪,則識住增長,識住增長故,入於名色,入名色故,諸行增長,行增長故,當來有增長,當來有增長故,生、老、病、死、憂、悲、惱、苦集,如是純大苦聚集」。反之,「無貪無喜故,識不住、不增長」,不入名色,純大苦聚滅。此機制亦以簡略形式說為「有貪有喜,則有憂悲、有塵垢」。

四、虛空無所攀緣之喻。佛以樓閣宮殿東西牕牖、日出東方照西壁為喻:若無西壁,光「應照虛空,無所攀緣」,喻四食無貪無喜則「識無所住」。又以畫師欲粧畫虛空而不能,因虛空「非色、無對、不可見」,喻識無所住則不增長;反以畫師能粧畫於色,喻有貪喜則識住增長。

五、四食與福德食之並說。經中另將四食與「福德潤澤,為安樂食」並舉,以於佛、法、僧不壞淨及聖戒成就為四種福德潤澤、善法潤澤、安樂食。

術語方面,本經一律用「識食」,四食總稱用「四食」;摶食或稱「麤摶食」或稱「摶食」,觸食或稱「細觸食」或稱「觸食」,意思食名稱固定。識食之作用以「識住增長」「入於名色」表述,斷除則以「識食斷知」「識無所住」表述。

增壹阿含經T0125 · 阿含部

《增壹阿含經》論識食,置於「四種食」框架之內,為佛於舍衛國祇樹給孤獨園對比丘所說。經云:「眾生之類有四種食,長養眾生」,謂摶食、更樂食、念食、識食。其中識食之定義為:「所念識者,意之所知,梵天為首,乃至有想、無想天,以識為食。」此即以識之了別作用為食,範圍自梵天起,上至有想天、無想天,皆依識而得存續。

就術語形式而言,本經有數處用詞與他經不同,宜加記錄:其一,段食本作「摶食」(或大、或小),而第二處引拘樓孫如來教時則作「揣食」,二字同指段食而本經前後異寫;其二,觸食本作「更樂食」,以「更樂」譯觸受之義,不逕稱「觸食」;其三,思食本作「念食」,以「念」攝意中所念想、所思惟者。此三處皆本經特有之譯語形式。

經中明言四食之功能為「長養眾生」,而其流轉義則云:「眾生之類以此四食,流轉生死,從今世至後世。」是故佛勸「當共捨離此四食」。識食在此並非中性描述,而與摶食、更樂食、念食同屬應捨離之對象,蓋四食共為繫縛有情於生死相續之因。

第二處經文(婆羅園乞食不得之因緣)引拘樓孫如來所說,將食擴展為九種:四種人間食(揣食、更樂食、念食、識食)與五種出世間食(禪食、願食、念食、八解脫食、喜食)。識食在此被歸入「人間食」即世間食一類,與出世間五食對舉。經中教誡為「捨除四種之食,求於方便辦五種之食」,識食既在四種世間食中,自屬當捨之列。

值得注意的是,「念食」一名同時出現於世間四食與出世間五食之中,而識食則僅見於世間四食,不預出世間五食之列。此為本經對識食定位之一個側面:識食純屬世間長養、生死流轉之範疇,不與出世間之禪、願、解脫、喜相涉。

綜上,《增壹阿含經》論識食之要旨為:識食以識之了知為體,所被自梵天至有想無想天;其性屬世間,與餘三食共為長養眾生、流轉生死之因;修行上當捨離之,轉求出世間之五食。本經以「更樂食」稱觸食、以「念食」稱思食、以「摶食/揣食」稱段食,皆為其譯語特色。

Related