Dharma · AI Companion

身見

satkāya-dṛṣṭi

身见指执着五蕴等法为我、我所的根本错误见解,是诸邪见之本与解脱之障。

A Contemporary Reading

Here is a deep, accessible, and comprehensive exploration of the concept of 身見 (satkāya-dṛṣṭi), tailored for a contemporary reader and written as a warm, knowledgeable guide along the path of liberation.

***

### 這個概念在說什麼 (What is this concept talking about?)

At the very core of the Buddhist path to liberation lies a fundamental diagnosis of human suffering: 身見 (satkāya-dṛṣṭi). Often translated as "Identity View," "Personality Belief," or "Self-View," it is the root illusion that binds us to dissatisfaction.

To understand *satkāya-dṛṣṭi*, we must first understand what Buddhism says we actually are. The Buddha observed that what we call a "person" is not a solid, unchanging soul, but a dynamic, ever-flowing process made up of five intertwined components, known as the 五蘊 (pañca-skandha, the Five Aggregates).

*Satkāya-dṛṣṭi* is the fatal error of looking at these five flowing aggregates and mistakenly grasping them as a permanent "I" (我) or "mine" (我所). The classical texts map this out with forensic precision. They do not just vaguely say "everything is empty"; they provide a specific structural breakdown of our experience and offer profound metaphors for each:

1. Form (色 rūpa): This encompasses all physical matter. It is not just your flesh and blood; it is the four great elements (earth, water, fire, wind) that make up your body *and* the external environment (like your desk, the trees, the weather). * *The Canonical Metaphor:* A mass of foam (如聚沫). From a distance, foam looks like a solid white object. Up close, it is porous, fragile, and full of empty space, unable to bear any real weight. 2. Feeling (受 vedanā): This is the raw sensation of an experience—categorized simply as pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral. * *The Canonical Metaphor:* A water bubble (如水泡). Sensation swells up in a split second when rain hits a puddle, and vanishes just as quickly. 3. Perception (想 saṃjñā): Often mistranslated as everyday "thoughts," this is actually the faculty of *recognition and labeling*. It grasps the characteristics of an object (size, color, meaning) and matches it to past memories. * *The Canonical Metaphor:* A spring heat mirage (如野馬/陽焰). It tricks a thirsty traveler into seeing a lake where there is only hot sand. Perception projects solid meaning onto fluid reality. 4. Volition / Mental Formations (行 saṃskāra): This is not outward physical action, but your inner will, intentions, and habitual karmic drives. It is the engine that constructs your reactions. * *The Canonical Metaphor:* A plantain tree (如芭蕉). If you chop down a banana tree and peel its layers seeking a solid heartwood, you will find absolutely nothing at the center. Our habitual urges are layered but coreless. 5. Consciousness (識 vijñāna): The foundational awareness or cognition of a target object. It is the "knowing" that something is happening. * *The Canonical Metaphor:* A magician's illusion (如幻). Like a magic trick, it relies entirely on external props and conditions to appear real, fooling the audience into believing a solid entity is present.

*Satkāya-dṛṣṭi* specifically manifests as Twenty Kinds of False Views (二十種計執). For each of the five aggregates, a confused mind insists on four permutations of ownership and identity. Take the "Form" (physical body/matter) aggregate, for example: * *It is me (是我):* "I am my body. I am my appearance." * *It is mine (異我 / 我所):* "I own this body. I possess it." * *I am in it (某中我):* "My soul lives somewhere inside this body." * *It is in me (我中某):* "My vast cosmic self contains this physical body."

Multiply these four by the five aggregates, and you get the twenty ways we frantically try to pin down an "I". In the grand architecture of the Buddhist path, *satkāya-dṛṣṭi* is the absolute bedrock of all 62 types of wrong views. It is the first of the Three Fetters (三結) and Five Lower Fetters (五下分結). Smashing this specific illusion is the exact threshold for attaining the first stage of enlightenment: Stream-entry (須陀洹果 Sotāpanna).

### 生活裡的走查 (A Walkthrough in Everyday Life)

Let’s bring this ancient structural map into a very contemporary, familiar scene.

Imagine you are commuting home after a long day. You check your phone and see a message from your boss criticizing a project you just submitted. Your heart drops, your jaw tightens, and a wave of defensive anger washes over you. Let’s walk through the Five Aggregates in this exact second, map out the *satkāya-dṛṣṭi*, and point out where we usually get it wrong.

* Form (色): The glowing pixels on the screen (external matter) meet your retinas. Your jaw tightens (internal matter). * *The Trap:* We separate the physical world into "me" and "my adversary." You think, "My body is tired, and *that phone* is ruining my night." We fail to see both body and screen are just a fragile mass of foam, merely elements interacting. * Feeling (受): A sharp, unpleasant sinking sensation hits your chest. * *The Trap:* Instead of seeing a fleeting water bubble of biological sensation, *satkāya-dṛṣṭi* whispers: "I am hurt." We take ownership of the sensation. * Perception (想): Your mind instantly grasps the meaning of the text, recognizes the tone, and slaps a label on it: "Unfair criticism!" * *The Trap:* We often confuse this with active thinking, but perception is the *instant labeling*. Like a mirage, you believe the "unfairness" is inherently built into the text, rather than a projection of your own mind. You think, "My work is being attacked." * Volition (行): The intense urge rises to fire back an angry text, or the anxiety kicks in, making you plan how to work late to fix it. * *The Trap:* We mistakenly view *volition* as our external physical actions, but it is actually this inner, conditioned will. We think, "I am angry. I must defend myself." We peel the coreless plantain tree, mistaking our conditioned defensive habits for a genuine, autonomous "self." * Consciousness (識): The overarching awareness that this entire miserable event is taking place. * *The Trap:* This is the sneakiest one. When you observe your anger, you might think, "Ah, I am the witness. I am the soul sitting behind my eyes watching this happen." You have bought into the magician's illusion, turning a conditioned moment of cognition into a permanent observer.

In just three seconds, the five aggregates fired sequentially, and *satkāya-dṛṣṭi* glued them together to construct a solid, suffering "Employee" who has been deeply wronged.

### 當代人為什麼需要它 (Why Contemporary People Need It)

We live in an era that aggressively markets the "Self." Contemporary culture demands that we curate our personal brand, find our "true authentic self," defend our boundaries, and express our unique identity through what we buy, post, and consume. We are exhausted because we are constantly playing defense for an entity that doesn't actually exist.

To borrow a modern analogy—though with clear limitations—think of the algorithms that govern our social media. An algorithm creates a "profile" of you. It aggregates your likes, your watch times, your location data, and your clicks. It predicts your behavior perfectly. But if you open up the servers, is there a little ghost inside the machine that *is* "you"? No. There are just millions of data points, interacting based on causes and conditions.

*Satkāya-dṛṣṭi* is the delusion that there is a ghost in the human machine. The Buddha is telling us that our identity is like that algorithmic profile: highly functional, entirely conditioned by past inputs (karma), but ultimately empty of a standalone "owner."

*(A necessary caveat: AI and neuroscience mapping brain plasticity offer a helpful mirror for understanding "conditioned processes without a central commander," but science operates strictly within the physical realm. It has not "proven" Buddhism, nor can a purely materialistic algorithm experience the profound cessation of suffering that the Buddha pointed to.)*

Contemporary people desperately need to understand *satkāya-dṛṣṭi* because it is the ultimate relief. The Buddha called living under this illusion a "Great Mass of Suffering" (大苦聚). Imagine the profound lightness of realizing you do not need to constantly build, defend, and mourn a self. By observing the aggregates as they really are—impermanent, unsatisfactory, and non-self—you stop fighting shadows. You put down a heavy burden you didn't even know you were carrying.

### 常見誤讀與澄清 (Common Misreadings and Clarifications)

Misreading 1: "If there is no 'I', then I don't exist. This is nihilism!" *Clarification:* Buddhism does not say *you* are nothing; it says you are not *what you think you are*. The Five Aggregates absolutely exist as a dynamic, causal process. If you drink coffee, the body and feelings experience the caffeine. The Buddha still walked, taught, and ate. The realization of non-self is not the destruction of your existence; it is the destruction of the *false assumption of an owner*. As a canonical analogy states, when you realize the king doesn't have absolute, magical control over his kingdom (your body gets sick, your mind gets sad despite your wishes), you stop trying to rule it with a tyrant's grip.

Misreading 2: "Getting rid of self-view means becoming an emotionless rock." *Clarification:* Breaking *satkāya-dṛṣṭi* doesn't make you cold; it actually makes true compassion possible. In the *Mahāratnakūṭa Sūtra (大寶積經)*, it is explicitly warned that a monk might keep perfect rules of conduct, but if they still harbor *satkāya-dṛṣṭi*, it is a "fake" morality. Why? Because a self-view creates a binary: "I am good, you are bad. I am the savior, you need saving." Only when the heart is liberated from self and ownership can one engage in "true, pure upholding of precepts" (真實淨持戒) and ride the Great Vehicle (Mahayana) to save all beings without the arrogance of an ego.

Misreading 3: "I understand this concept intellectually, so I'm free from self-view." *Clarification:* *Satkāya-dṛṣṭi* is a deep, latent tendency, not just a philosophical error. The sutras point out that even a newborn baby, who lacks complex conceptual thoughts, still harbors the latent tendency of self-view (性使). It operates at an incredibly deep layer of our operating system. It cannot be read away; it must be meditated away. It requires relying on the Path (依道斷結)—specifically the Noble Eightfold Path—to observe the aggregates in real-time and dissolve the fetter experientially.

Misreading 4: "Self-view is evil and must be violently destroyed." *Clarification:* In the profound depths of Mahayana wisdom, the texts tell us not to fear or hate our self-view. The Bodhisattva Mañjuśrī pointed out that "Self-view itself is True Reality" (身見等是實際). Because the self-view is fundamentally empty—it arises from conditions, has no real substance, neither comes nor goes—its true nature is empty. To see the true, empty nature of your own ego *is* to see Bodhi (Awakening). You don't kill the self; you wake up from the mirage.

Canonical Entry

# 身見(satkāya-dṛṣṭi) ## 一、定义与核心要义 身见(satkāya-dṛṣṭi),在经典中又常被称为“自身见”或“有身见”,是指凡夫因愚痴无闻,对五蕴(五阴、五盛阴、五受阴)等法产生执着,妄计其中有“我”或“我所”的根本错误见解 [chunk:4835, chunk:5343]。它是诸邪见的根本源头,也是修行者在解脱道上首要断除的缚结 [chunk:5343, chunk:7501]。 ## 二、主要阐述 ### 1. 身见的具体表现与二十种计执 经典对身见(自身见、有身见)的具体形态进行了极其细致的剖析。其核心表现为凡夫在五蕴与自我(“我”或“神”)的关系上,产生二十种错误的计执 [chunk:4835, chunk:5343]: * 是我:如“见色是我”,在禅定中观地、水、火、风等,便计执“地即是我,我即是地” [chunk:5343];或将六受身、六想身、六思身、六识身等一一见之为我 [chunk:5344]。 * 异我(我所):见受、想、行、识是我,而见色是我所(即“色异我”),或反之 [chunk:5343, chunk:5344]。 * 我中某:见受等是我,而色在其中(即“我中色”) [chunk:5343]。 * 某中我:见受等是我,而此我于色中住,周遍其四体(即“色中我”) [chunk:5344]。 此外,身见还具体化为对眼、耳、鼻、舌、身、意等六根及对应六境的自我执着,如执着“眼是我,我有眼……意是我,我有意” [chunk:3915]。在大乘经典中,身见表现为凡夫发起“我想”与“他想”,并安住在“我胜、我所胜”的傲慢与分别之中 [chunk:14886]。 ### 2. 身见的危害与潜伏性 身见是一切痛苦与邪见的根源。经典指出,世间凡是说有我、说众生、说寿命、说世间吉凶等种种异见,皆以身见为根本,由身见而集、生、转 [chunk:5343, chunk:6604]。 * 结缚与障碍:身见被列为“五下分结”之一 [chunk:2739, chunk:4786, chunk:4787],能覆盖、障碍智慧,令人不得涅槃 [chunk:4077]。不当的清苦苦行也可能导致生起“身见、边见、邪见、见取”等恶见 [chunk:3489]。 * 潜伏性(性使):即使是无知无想的婴儿,虽主观上“无自身想”,但由于“性使”的存在,其身心之中依然保有“身见使” [chunk:4786]。 * 缠缚与堕落:若人被身见所缠,且在身见心生起时“不知舍如真”,身见就会转盛而不可制除 [chunk:4787]。执着五阴为我者,必受其害,犹如商人被罗刹所食 [chunk:3915]。即使是天界玉女,若“系着有身见”,本质上仍是大苦聚 [chunk:19049]。若修行者对“有身”仍有顾念,心不乐著“有身灭涅槃”,则如手沾黏胶去执树枝,终不能得离,必将还生此界 [chunk:6372]。 ### 3. 断除身见的途径 * 观非我与无常:修行者应如实观察五阴不论过去、未来、现在、内外、粗细、好丑、远近,皆悉无常、苦、空、非我,如病、如痈、如刺、如杀 [chunk:5127, chunk:5351, chunk:6604]。佛陀曾以国王在自国有支配权为喻,说明若五阴是我,应能随心支配,以此破除萨遮尼犍子“色是我人”的执着 [chunk:5351]。 * 依道断结:断除身见必须“依道、依迹” [chunk:4787]。若在身见缠生起时“即知舍如真”,身见之缠便能熄灭 [chunk:4788]。 * 大乘实相的超越:大乘经典提出了更深层的视角。真正的平等空是“身见异空,异故身见即是空” [chunk:14890]。文殊师利菩萨指出“身见等是实际”,因为“身见如相,非实非不实、不来不去,亦身非身” [chunk:19409]。甚至提出“从身见根本求于菩提”,若能如实觉知身见等诸法的如实之性,这本身就是菩提 [chunk:14907]。 ## 三、不同部类与译本的表述差异 在不同经典及译本中,关于身见及其相关概念的术语呈现出明显的差异: 1. 五蕴的称呼: * 《中阿含經》:常译为“五盛阴”(色、觉、想、行、识盛阴) [chunk:4835] 或“五阴” [chunk:3915]。 * 《雜阿含經》:常译为“五受阴”(色、受、想、行、识受阴) [chunk:5127, chunk:5157, chunk:6355] 或“五阴” [chunk:5351]。 * 《大寶積經》:同时使用“五阴” [chunk:18070] 与“五取蕴” [chunk:19515] 的表述。 2. 身见与“身”的称呼: * 《中阿含經》:称身见为“自身见” [chunk:4835],并将“自身”定义为“五盛阴” [chunk:4835]。 * 《雜阿含經》:称身见为“有身见” [chunk:5343, chunk:19049],并将“有身”定义为“五受阴” [chunk:5157, chunk:5385, chunk:6355]。 * 《大寶積經》:使用“身见颠倒” [chunk:14886],并以“身车”比喻身体,说明其为诸界和合、由识牵挽而“建立假为身”的非真实存在 [chunk:19532]。 3. 自我的称呼: * 《中阿含經》:在论述二十种身见时,将自我称为“神” [chunk:4835]。 * 《雜阿含經》:在论述二十种身见时,将自我称为“我” [chunk:5343]。 ## 四、与相关概念的关系 1. 与三结、五下分结:身见是“五下分结”之一 [chunk:2739, chunk:4786, chunk:4787]。在解脱道中,若能断除“身见、戒取、疑”三结,即证得须陀洹果(初果),不堕恶趣 [chunk:7501];若进一步断有身集(当来有爱)、修八正道(有身灭道迹),则能证得有身灭,成阿罗汉 [chunk:5157, chunk:5385, chunk:6355]。 2. 与六十二见:身见是一切邪见的根本,被称为“身见为本六十二见趣” [chunk:16101]。 3. 与持戒的真伪:在《大寶積經》中,若比丘虽持戒清净但“随所说行身见不灭”,则属于“破戒比丘似善持戒” [chunk:19327];因为存有身见,便会产生“此是持戒、此是犯戒”的二元观察与取着 [chunk:15673]。唯有“心解脱身见,除灭我我所”,才是“真实净持戒” [chunk:19328]。 4. 与大乘修行的关系:未离身见的菩萨不能称为“被大甲冑乘于大乘”,因为仍会执着于断、常等“二际”之门 [chunk:14789, chunk:14793, chunk:14794];菩萨必须以无依止智“破一切见令拔身见”,方能于菩提不退转 [chunk:18070]。 ## 五、代表性原文引用 * 《中阿含經》:“自身見者,多聞不具足凡夫……見色是神、見神有色、見神中有色、見色中有神……是謂自身見。” [chunk:4835] * 《雜阿含經》:“世間凡是說有我、說眾生、說壽命、說世間吉凶等種種異見,一切皆以身見為根本,由身見集、身見生、身見轉。” [chunk:5343] * 《大寶積經》:“身見等是實際。所以者何?身見如相,非實非不實、不來不去,亦身非身,是故身見等是實際。” [chunk:19409]

By Sutra

T0026 · 阿含部

在《T0026》中,“身见”这一概念有着系统而独特的论述,其核心表述、术语形式及断除方法如下: 一、 核心术语与“自身”的定义 本经在论述身见时,使用了独特的译词。身见常被称为“自身见”[chunk:4835]。而“自身”被定义为“五盛阴”(即色盛阴,觉、想、行、识盛阴)[chunk:4835]。此外,经中也常以“五阴”(色阴,觉、想、行、识阴)来指代五蕴[chunk:3915]。 二、 身见(自身见)的具体表现 根据法乐比丘尼的阐释,“自身见”是多闻不具的愚痴凡夫因不知圣法而产生的错误见解,具体表现为对五盛阴与“神”(即自我)关系的二十种执着:见色是神、见神有色、见神中有色、见色中有神;并对觉、想、行、识四阴亦作如是的四种错误观察[chunk:4835]。此外,经中将身见具体化为“眼是我,我有眼……意是我,我有意”等对六根、六境的自我执着,以及“色阴是我,我有色阴,觉、想、行、识阴是我,我有识阴”等对五阴的执着[chunk:3915]。 三、 身见的性质、危害与潜伏性 1. 结缚与障碍:身见被列为“五下分结”之一[chunk:2739, chunk:4786, chunk:4787],同时也是能作障碍、覆盖、灭智慧、令人不得涅槃的五法之一[chunk:4077]。 2. 潜伏性(性使):经中指出,即使是无知无想的婴儿,虽然主观上“无自身想”,但由于“性使”的存在,其身心之中依然保有“身见使”[chunk:4786]。 3. 缠缚与危害:若人被身见所缠,且在身见心生起时“不知舍如真”,身见就会转盛而不可制除[chunk:4787]。执着五阴为我者,必受其害,犹如商人被罗刹所食[chunk:3915]。此外,不当的清苦苦行也可能导致生起“身见、边见、邪见、见取”等恶见[chunk:3489]。 四、 如何断除身见(无身见) 1. 确立“无身见”:多闻圣弟子知圣法,不将五盛阴(色、觉、想、行、识)视为神,亦不认为神拥有五盛阴或与之相互容纳,这被称为“无身见”[chunk:4835]。 2. 观非我:修行者应作是念:“眼非是我,我无有眼……色阴非是我,我无有色阴”,如此方能安隐得度[chunk:3915]。 3. 依道断结:断除身见必须“依道、依跡”[chunk:4787]。若修行者在身见缠生起时,能“即知舍如真”,身见之缠便能熄灭[chunk:4788]。 4. 灭自身:最终的解脱在于彻底断尽五盛阴,使其“断无余,舍、吐、尽、不染、灭、息、没”[chunk:4835]。

T0099 · 阿含部

在《T0099》(雜阿含經)中,“身見”是修行者在解脫道路上首要斷除的根本錯誤見解。本經對此概念進行了系統且詳盡的論述。一、獨特術語與定義:在本經中,與“身見”相關的術語呈現出獨特的譯詞特徵。首先,本經將通常所說的“五蘊”譯為“五受陰”或“五陰”[chunk:5127, 5157, 5351, 6355]。其次,本經引入了“有身”這一概念,並明確定義“有身”即是“五受陰”(色受陰,受、想、行、識受陰)[chunk:5157, 5385, 6355]。此外,“身見”在經中亦常被稱為“有身見”[chunk:5343, 19049]。二、身見的具體表現(二十種計執):本經詳細剖析了身見的具體形態。愚癡無聞的凡夫因無慧無明,在五受陰中生起“我見繫著”[chunk:5127]。這種繫著具體表現為對色、受、想、行、識五受陰分別產生四種錯誤的計執,共計二十種身見[chunk:5343, 5344, 6604]:1.「是我」:如“見色是我”,在禪定中觀地、水、火、風等,便計執“地即是我,我即是地,唯一無二”[chunk:5343];或將六受身、六想身、六思身、六識身一一見之為我[chunk:5344]。2.「異我」:見受、想、行、識是我,而見色是我所(即“色異我”),或見色是我,而受等是我所[chunk:5343, 5344]。3.「我中某」:見受等是我,而色在其中(即“我中色”)[chunk:5343]。4.「某中我」:見受等是我,而此我於色中住,周遍其四體(即“色中我”)[chunk:5344]。三、身見為諸邪見之根本與危害:本經強調,身見是一切邪見與痛苦的根源。尊者梨犀達多與舍利弗皆指出,世間凡是說有我、說眾生、說壽命、說世間吉凶等種種異見,一切皆以“身見”為根本,由身見而集、生、轉[chunk:5343, 6604]。凡夫因身見而使心結縛、生起貪欲[chunk:5127]。即使是天界玉女,雖處妙境,但因顛倒想而“繫著有身見”,本質上仍是大苦聚[chunk:19049]。若修行者對“有身”仍有顧念,心不樂著“有身滅涅槃”,則如手沾黏膠去執樹枝,終不能得離,必將還生此界[chunk:6372]。四、破除身見的途徑與證果:佛陀在與薩遮尼犍子的辯論中,以國王在自國有自在支配權為喻,質問若五陰是我,是否能隨意自在令其如是或不如是。薩遮尼犍子無言以對,以此證明五陰非我、無我,從而破除其“色是我人”的執著[chunk:5351]。多聞聖弟子不見五陰是我、異我、相在,而是正觀五陰不論過去、未來、現在、內外、麤細、好醜、遠近,皆悉無常、苦、空、非我,如病、如癰、如刺、如殺,從而得無身見[chunk:5127, 5351, 6604]。本經明確指出,若比丘能如實觀察,斷除“身見、戒取、疑”三結,即證得須陀洹果(初果),不墮惡趣,決定正向三菩提[chunk:7501]。進一步知有身、斷有身集(當來有愛)、修八正道(有身滅道跡),則能證得有身滅,究竟苦邊,成阿羅漢[chunk:5157, 5385, 6355]。

T0310 · 寶積部

在本經中,「身見」被視為一種根本的顛倒與執著,是修行者證入大乘、圓滿戒行及契入實相所必須面對與超越的核心課題。 一、 身見的定義與表現形式 經中指出,身見是一種「身見顛倒」,其表現為凡夫發起「我想」,執著於「我想」及「他想」,並安住在「我勝、我所勝」的傲慢與分別之中,進而造作種種善惡諸業並受其果報 [chunk:14886]。身見也是一切邪見的根本,經中稱其為「身見為本六十二見趣」 [chunk:16101]。在術語使用上,本經在論及身見與五蘊的關係時,同時使用了「五陰」 [chunk:18070] 與「五取蘊」 [chunk:19515] 的表述;並以「身車」為喻,說明身體是由諸界和合、諸根備具、由識牽挽而「建立假為身」的非真實存在 [chunk:19532]。 二、 身見與持戒、修行的關係 本經特別強調了斷除身見對於「真持戒」與「乘大乘」的決定性意義: 1. 持戒的真偽:經中指出,若比丘雖然誦持戒律、身口意業清淨,但「隨所說行身見不滅」,則屬於「破戒比丘似善持戒」 [chunk:19327]。因為存有身見,便會產生「此是持戒、此是犯戒」的二元觀察與取著 [chunk:15673]。唯有「心解脫身見,除滅我我所」,不自高、不依止,才是諸聖所讚歎的「真實淨持戒」 [chunk:19328]。 2. 大乘的資格:未離身見的菩薩,不能稱為「被大甲冑乘於大乘」,因為他們仍會執著於斷、常等「二際」之門;唯有已斷身見、遠離我慢者,方能不執著於諸際,乘安樂大乘發趣菩提 [chunk:14789, chunk:14793, chunk:14794]。菩薩需善知五陰、十二入、十八界等,以無依止智「破一切見令拔身見」,方能於菩提不退轉 [chunk:18070]。 三、 身見的實相與超越(獨特視角) 本經對身見的探討並未停留在單純的「斷除」,而是從法界體性的高度,提出了極具大乘深意的獨特見解: 1. 身見即是空:經中警示,若僅僅口說「身見是空」或驚畏身見而求空,仍屬於「增上慢」。真正的平等空是「身見異空,異故身見即是空」 [chunk:14890]。 2. 身見即實際:文殊師利菩薩指出「身見等是實際」,因為「身見如相,非實非不實、不來不去,亦身非身」,此即是諸法住於實際的體性 [chunk:19409]。 3. 從身見求菩提:經中甚至提出「從身見根本求於菩提」的觀點,因為若能如實覺知身見等諸法的如實之性,這本身就是菩提 [chunk:14907]。

Related