Dharma · AI Companion

諸佛

sarva-buddha

过去现在未来三世的一切佛。AI-generated

Type AttainmentDifficulty IntroductoryTruth-level span I · dependent arising ⇢ III · nominal designationInitial AI estimate · evolves with use

三世十方一切佛之总称,第一重佛宝信仰所摄(初立第一重);华严「一切诸佛唯是一法身」为正面究竟重读,然此读法消解的是名言层的复数安立,故止于3。

A Contemporary ReadingAI-generated

What This Concept Means

In the Mahayana Buddhist scripture *The Great Heap Sutra* (*Māhāratnakūṭa Sūtra*, 《大寶積經》), All Buddhas (*Zhū Fó*, 諸佛)—often used interchangeably with Tathāgata (*Rúlái*, 如來)—are defined as spiritual guides of the world (*shì dǎoshī*, 世導師) who possess boundless merit, pervade the ten directions (*shífāng shìjiè*, 十方世界), fully comprehend all phenomena across the three times (*sānshì zhūfǎ*, 三世諸法), and lead sentient beings toward Awakening (*bodhi*, 菩提) [19116].

To truly understand "All Buddhas," we must look beyond a vague notion of "gods" or "pantheon." In classical Mahayana philosophy, All Buddhas occupy a very specific structural place within the path to liberation (*mārga*, 解脫道):

1. **The Reality of All-Encompassing Wisdom (*Sarvajñatā*, 一切種智):** A Buddha is not an abstract myth, but an intelligence that has thoroughly penetrated all phenomena without obstruction ("for all laws, there is nothing not understood," 於一切法靡不明達) [19116]. They grasp all physical and mental events past, present, and future ("fully knowing all laws of the three times," 悉已了知三世諸法) across all spatial realms ("pervading the worlds of the ten directions," 普能遍於十方世界) [19116]. Their presence is not confined to a single historical figure like Śākyamuni, but represents an infinite reality of awakened beings across time and space.

2. The Teachers and Companions on the Bodhisattva Path: For a Bodhisattva (*Púsà*, 菩薩; an practitioner seeking full enlightenment), All Buddhas are not distant icons to be worshiped from afar, but reliable spiritual companions (*kalyāṇamitra*) and guideposts. According to the *Great Heap Sutra*, a Bodhisattva does not need to wait until final Buddhahood to encounter Buddhas. Through specific practices, a practitioner can constantly meet, reside with, and receive guidance from All Buddhas *throughout* their long journey before fully awakening ("prior to realizing right orientation/awakening, in every place of birth, always meeting with All Buddhas," 未成正覺頃,在所生之處,恒與諸佛會) [18777].

3. The Four Key Practices to Constantly Encounter All Buddhas: In the sutra, the Buddha outlines to the female practitioner Vimaladattā (*Wúgòushī Nǚ*, 無垢施女) four essential practices required to maintain a continuous, uninterrupted connection with All Buddhas [18776]. These four practices are mapped precisely across prose and verse versions in the text [18776, 18777]:

* 1. Protecting the Dharma / Bodhi without Slander (不誹謗法 / 不謗於菩提): * *Classical Definition:* Preferring to surrender one's physical body and life rather than slander the Right Dharma (*Saddharma*, 正法) or Bodhi [18776, 18777]. * *Deep Meaning:* The Dharma/Bodhi is the ultimate reality and truth realized by all Buddhas. To slander or reject the truth is to cut off one's own connection to the Buddha's Truth Body (*Dharmakāya*, 法身). * 2. Protecting Bodhisattvas without Slander (不誹謗菩薩 / 不毀菩薩): * *Classical Definition:* Preferring to give up life rather than slander or disparage Bodhisattvas [18776, 18777]. * *Deep Meaning:* Bodhisattvas are the "children of the Dharma" carrying out compassion in the world. Disparaging those who strive for enlightenment destroys the spiritual lineage and breaks harmony with the Buddha-community. * 3. Deliberately Leaving Unwholesome Companions (不親近惡知識 / 樂離惡知識): * *Classical Definition:* Preferring death over associating with bad influences or destructive spiritual companions (*pāpamitra*, 惡知識), taking joy in turning away from them [18776, 18777]. * *Deep Meaning:* Unwholesome influences derail one's mind, reinforcing greed, anger, and delusion. Leaving them clears the mental space required to align with awakened intelligence. * 4. Never Tiring of Remembering All Buddhas (於諸佛生憶念心無有厭足 / 念諸佛無厭): * *Classical Definition:* Generating a constant, insatiable, joyful mindfulness/recollection (*buddhānusmṛti*, 憶念) of the merits and teachings of All Buddhas [18776, 18777]. * *Deep Meaning:* Mindfulness of the Buddha is not an obligation, but an unyielding orientation of mind. By repeatedly turning mental focus toward Awakened Mind, the practitioner turns their life trajectory toward Buddhas.


A Walk Through Contemporary Life

How do these four practices—and the reality of "All Buddhas"—play out in everyday modern life? Let's walk through a routine day of commuting, working, using social media, and managing relationships.

Scenario A: Social Media, News Feeds, and "Not Slandering the Dharma"

* The Experience: You are scrolling through social media. You see heated arguments, cynical comments ridiculing selflessness, or posts trivializing deep spiritual practices as "mere coping mechanisms" or "scams." * The Mismapping: People often think "slandering the Dharma" only means burning holy scriptures or openly insulting religion. * The True Mapping: In daily life, "slandering the Dharma/Bodhi" occurs whenever you cynicalize, dismiss, or actively distort core universal truths—such as cause and effect (*karma*), impermanence, compassion, and the possibility of human awakening. When you casually post a sarcastic comment dismissing someone's genuine attempt to act with selflessness or mindfulness, you diminish your own trust in truth. Choosing to defend truth—even if it costs social validation or online popularity—is "preferring to sacrifice life rather than slander the Dharma" [18776].

Scenario B: Workplace Politics and "Not Disparaging Bodhisattvas"

* The Experience: At work, a colleague spends extra time helping a struggling junior teammate or advocating for an ethical practice, slowing down a commercial launch. Others mock them behind their back as "naive," "a try-hard," or "inefficient." * The Mismapping: People assume a "Bodhisattva" is only a monk in robes or an ancient figure in a temple painting. * The True Mapping: Anyone in your life who generates a genuine, altruistic intention to relieve suffering and help others walk toward sanity is expressing the spirit of a Bodhisattva. Disparaging them—labeling their ethical integrity as "stupid" or "manipulative"—is "slandering a Bodhisattva" [18776]. Protecting this relationship means recognizing and respecting the spark of awakening in others, refusing to participate in gossip that tears down good intent.

Scenario C: Algorithmic Doomscrolling, Toxic Friendships, and "Leaving Bad Companions"

* The Experience: You belong to group chats or online forums filled with perpetual outrage, doom, cynicism, or subtle encouragement to cut corners ethically. Or, your phone's recommendation algorithm constantly feeds you content that fuels anxiety and envy. * The Mismapping: People think an "evil friend/bad companion" (*惡知識*) must be an overtly malicious villain trying to ruin your life. * The True Mapping: An "evil companion" in the classical sense is *any* source—be it a person, a group chat, or an algorithmic feed—that systematically degrades your ethical clarity and pulls you away from mindfulness toward craving and resentment. "Taking joy in leaving evil companions" (*樂離惡知識*) [18777] means deleting toxic apps, leaving demoralizing online groups, and setting boundaries with people who feed your worst impulses.

Scenario D: Overwhelmed by Overwork and "Mindfulness of Buddhas Without Fatigue"

* The Experience: You are overwhelmed by back-to-back meetings, deadlines, and domestic burdens. Your mind feels scattered, anxious, and depleted. * The Mismapping: People think "mindfulness of Buddhas" (*念諸佛*) means dropping everything to sit in a meditation hall for hours, which feels impossible in a busy life. * The True Mapping: "Mindfulness of All Buddhas" (*念諸佛無厭*) [18777] is an intentional, underlying orientation. Amid the noise of a packed day, you briefly re-anchor your awareness: *There exists in this universe an infinite, awakened, compassionate intelligence that has fully understood life's nature.* Remembering this frees you from the illusion that your temporary workplace drama is the totality of reality. It instills an effortless, joyful trust in the possibility of freedom.


Why Modern People Need This Concept

Contemporary life is defined by acute psychological fragmentation, hyper-individualism, and ambient cynicism. The ancient concept of "All Buddhas" offers profound remedies to modern existential dilemmas:

1. Breaking the Isolation of Self-Help: Modern culture frames personal growth as a lonely, self-reliant struggle ("fix yourself by yourself"). The doctrine of "All Buddhas" reminds practitioners that awakening is supported by a vast, infinite network of fully realized beings. You are not reinventing the wheel in isolation; you are entering into a lineage of guidance that spans the entire universe [19116].

2. Countering "Doomism" and Nihilism: Algorithms amplify crisis, scandal, and despair, making the world seem devoid of hope. The concept of All Buddhas asserts that boundless wisdom and compassion (*karuṇā*) are actively present in ten directions across past, present, and future [19116]. Realizing that ultimate sanity has been achieved—and continues to be embodied by uncountable beings—restores fundamental faith (*śraddhā*) in existence.

3. An Analogy with Modern Networks (and Its Limitations): * *The Analogy:* Think of "All Buddhas" like an omnipresent, open-source cloud architecture of infinite intelligence and ethical clarity. Every time you cultivate mindfulness, protect truth, or turn away from toxic noise, you "ping" and sync with this universal network. * *The Limitation:* Unlike digital networks—which depend on physical servers, internet protocols, and data centers subject to outages or corporate control—the ultimate reality of All Buddhas (*Dharmakāya*) is unconditioned, uncreated, and free from spatial or temporal limits. Science and technology describe material information exchanges, whereas Buddhas represent the transcendent realization of mind itself.


Common Misunderstandings & Clarifications

Misunderstanding 1: "All Buddhas are just deities or gods in a Mahayana pantheon."

* Clarification: Gods (*devas*) in Buddhist cosmology are still trapped within the realm of cyclic existence (*saṃsāra*), subject to impermanence, subtle delusion, and eventual rebirth. Buddhas, by contrast, have completely uprooted fundamental ignorance (*avidyā*), fully comprehended all phenomena ("for all laws, there is nothing not understood," 於一切法靡不明達) [19116], and transcended all rebirth driven by karma. They are not worldly rulers granting favors, but guides (*shì dǎoshī*, 世導師) pointing toward awakening [19116].

Misunderstanding 2: "To 'meet All Buddhas' means having a supernatural vision or seeing physical apparitions."

* Clarification: While visionary experiences occur in classical literature, the core meaning of "always meeting All Buddhas" (*恒與諸佛會*) [18777] is internal and spiritual. Meeting a Buddha means aligning one's mind with the Buddha's realization. If one protects the Dharma, respects Bodhisattvas, avoids toxic influences, and remembers awakening, their consciousness is seamlessly unified with the essence of All Buddhas—regardless of external sensory forms.

**Misunderstanding 3: "Remembering Buddhas without fatigue (*念諸佛無厭*) means obsessive, compulsive chanting."**

* Clarification: "Without fatigue" (*無有厭足 / 無厭*) [18776, 18777] does not imply an exhausted, compulsive obsession. It refers to a deep, unwavering joy and trust that never grows stale or burdensome. Unlike worldly pleasures, which quickly lead to burnout and boredom (*satiety*), contemplating the infinite peace and merit of Awakened Mind yields an inexhaustible, refreshing clarity.

Canonical EntryAI-generated

一、定义与核心要义

在《大宝积经》中,「诸佛」(亦常表述为「如来」)是指功德无量无边、普能遍于十方世界、悉已了知三世一切诸法且于一切法靡不明达的世间导师。其核心要义在于,诸佛不仅是彻底觉悟宇宙真理的至高存在,更是修行者在漫长菩提道路上的引导者与伴侣。对于菩萨修行者而言,诸佛的功德是激发信乐、趣求菩提的源泉;而通过特定的修行法门,菩萨能够在尚未最终成就无上正等正觉的修行过程中,恒常与诸佛相聚相会,值遇诸佛并蒙其引导。

二、主要阐述

《大宝积经》对「诸佛」的阐述主要围绕两个维度展开:一是菩萨如何得以常遇诸佛的具体修行方法,二是诸佛(如来)本身所具备的无量功德与普度众生的特质。 首先,关于「常遇诸佛」的修行法门。佛陀在经中对无垢施女进行了深入开示,明确指出菩萨若渴望在修行生涯中常遇诸佛,必须成就四种关键法门: 第一,宁可舍弃自己的身命,也绝对不诽谤正法。正法是诸佛智慧的体现,诽谤正法即是断绝与诸佛法身的联系,因此修行者必须以生命守护正法。 第二,宁可舍弃自己的身命,也绝对不诽谤菩萨。菩萨是诸佛法子的代表,诽谤菩萨等同于破坏僧团与菩提道,故须誓死不予毁谤。 第三,宁可舍弃自己的身命,也绝对不亲近恶知识。恶知识会引导修行者偏离正道,远离恶知识方能保持清净的修行方向。 第四,对诸佛生起忆念之心,且这种忆念是永无厌足的。修行者应当在内心深处恒常忆念诸佛的功德与教诲,不生疲厌。 经文随后以偈颂形式对这四法进行了高度提炼,表述为「不谤于菩提,亦不毁菩萨,乐离恶知识,念诸佛无厌」。行持这四种法门的修行者,将获得极为殊胜的果报:他们不仅在当下能值遇诸佛,甚至在「未成正觉顷」(即在尚未最终成就无上正等正觉的漫长修行过程中),都能够「恒与诸佛会」,即恒常与诸佛相聚相会,这充分展示了诸佛作为修行者导师与伴侣的恒常存在性。 其次,关于诸佛的功德与特质。经中在论述诸佛时,亦常使用「如来」这一术语。如来的功德是无量无边的,其智慧深广,对于一切万法没有不通达明了的(「于一切法靡不明达」)。作为「世导师」,如来以大悲心度化那些尚未得度的众生,其智慧与存在「普能遍于十方世界」,并且「悉已了知三世诸法」。这体现了诸佛遍及十方、了知三世的觉悟特征与无上智慧。任何有智慧的人,在听闻了如来这般能令人「生安乐处」的功德之聚后,都会发起猛利的信乐之心,从而趣求菩提。

三、不同部类与译本的表述差异

在《大宝积经》(宝积部·《大寶積經》)中,对于「诸佛」这一概念及其相关修行的表述,存在着散文(长行)与偈颂之间的用语对应与微细差异: 1. 诸佛与如来的互译与并用:经文在探讨修行者如何遇佛时,多使用「诸佛」一词(如「常遇诸佛」、「值遇诸佛」、「恒与诸佛会」);而在具体赞叹其无量功德、十方遍在及三世了知等特质时,则主要使用「如来」这一术语(如「如来功德无量无边」、「听闻如来如是功德」)。 2. 「不诽谤法」与「不谤于菩提」:在散文部分,佛陀开示的第一法为「宁舍身命不诽谤法」;而在偈颂部分,这一法门被对应表述为「不谤于菩提」。此处将「法」与「菩提」进行了某种程度的等同或关联。 3. 「不诽谤菩萨」与「不毁菩萨」:散文表述为「宁舍身命不诽谤菩萨」,偈颂中则简化并提炼为「亦不毁菩萨」。 4. 「不亲近恶知识」与「乐离恶知识」:散文强调行为上的「宁舍身命不亲近恶知识」,偈颂则从心态与志向上强调「乐离恶知识」。 5. 「于诸佛生忆念心,无有厌足」与「念诸佛无厌」:散文详细表述为「于诸佛生忆念心,无有厌足」,偈颂则精炼为「念诸佛无厌」。

四、与相关概念的关系

1. 诸佛与菩萨:菩萨是追求无上正等正觉的修行者,而诸佛则是其修行的终极目标与导师。菩萨若想在修行过程中「恒与诸佛会」,必须通过不诽谤菩萨、不谤正法等修行来积累资粮。诸佛的功德亦是激励菩萨发起信乐、趣求菩提的根本动力。 2. 诸佛与正法(菩提):正法与菩提是诸佛觉悟的内容。诸佛「于一切法靡不明达」,「悉已了知三世诸法」。因此,诽谤正法或诽谤菩提,即是对诸佛觉悟智慧的否定,这会直接障碍修行者值遇诸佛。 3. 诸佛与恶知识:恶知识是修行的障碍,会拉拢修行者偏离佛法。与之相反,诸佛是引导众生解脱的「世导师」。因此,修行者必须「乐离恶知识」,方能「常遇诸佛」。 4. 诸佛与众生:诸佛(如来)以普度众生为怀,其功德能令众生「生安乐处」,并度化那些尚未得度的众生。

五、代表性原文引用

1. 《大宝积经》:「佛告无垢施女:『菩萨成就四法,常遇诸佛。何等为四?一者、宁舍身命,不诽谤法;二者、宁舍身命,不诽谤菩萨;三者、宁舍身命,不亲近恶知识;四者、于诸佛生忆念心,无有厌足。』」 2. 《大宝积经》偈颂:「不谤于菩提,亦不毁菩萨,乐离恶知识,念诸佛无厌。此人值诸佛,未成正觉顷,在所生之处,恒与诸佛会。」 3. 《大宝积经》:「如来功德无量无边,于一切法靡不明达,为世导师度未度者。普能遍于十方世界,悉已了知三世诸法。若有智人,闻如来如是功德能生安乐处,谁不发心趣求菩提?」

By SutraAI-generated

大寶積經T0310 · 寶積部

《大寶積經》對「諸佛」——過去、現在、未來三世一切佛——的論述,主要見於兩段文義:一是迴向修行的典範,二是常遇諸佛的成就法。

一、以三世諸佛為迴向之典範

經文明說:「如過去未來現在諸佛所作迴向,我亦如是迴向。」此句「過去未來現在」即三世並舉,顯示本經以「諸佛」通攝三世一切佛,而非僅指某一尊佛或某一時之佛。修行者以三世諸佛所作之迴向為典範,願自身亦作同等之迴向。此句突顯諸佛作為「行儀可效」之典範的意義:諸佛不僅是禮敬、憶念的對象,其具體之迴向行持亦為菩薩所應隨學的對境。

二、常遇諸佛之四種成就法

經中世尊對無垢施女宣說:菩薩若成就四法則「常遇諸佛」。所謂四者為:(一)寧捨身命不誹謗法——寧可捨身命亦不誹謗正法;(二)寧捨身命不謗菩薩——寧可捨身命亦不毀謗菩薩;(三)寧捨身命不親近惡知識——寧可捨身命亦不親近惡知識;(四)憶念諸佛無有厭足——對諸佛之憶念恆無厭足。此四法皆以「寧捨身命」為誓,顯示其難行與莊嚴;其中前三項側重遮止——遮止謗法、謗菩薩、親近惡知識,第四項側重修習——於憶念諸佛精進無厭。止惡與修善並舉,方能感得常遇諸佛之果。

三、偈頌的重宣與名相互通

世尊為重宣前義而說偈言:「不謗於菩提,亦不毀菩薩,樂離惡知識,念諸佛無厭。大德行此行,得值遇諸佛,未成正覺頃,恒與諸佛會。」此偈將長行中之「不誹謗法」以「不謗於菩提」代之,「菩提」一詞既可指無上正等正覺之果,亦可指趣向菩提之正法教理;此處與長行「法」字所指相通,可見本經於護持之對象上,以「法」「菩提」二名同指趣向佛道之正法。偈末「未成正覺頃,恒與諸佛會」揭示:在尚未證得無上正等正覺之前,能恆常與諸佛相會,強調諸佛加被之相續不斷,亦顯示常遇諸佛乃未成正覺之菩薩修行過程中的恆常境界,而非究竟果位方得之事。

四、術語與表述之特色

本經一律以「諸佛」稱三世一切佛,未見另立特殊名稱;於時間向度上,則完整使用「過去未來現在」之並列表述,與他經常見之「三世諸佛」「十方諸佛」可相通會。然本經此處直接以「過去未來現在諸佛」並列,未作簡稱或異稱,亦未進一步界定諸佛之數量或國土,故僅就該概念之廣義——三世一切佛——而立論,未涉及諸佛之具體名號、身相、國土等細目。

大智度論T1509 · 釋經論部

《大智度論》論述「諸佛」之義,首以「三世」為框架展開。其引文明示:「過去、未來,現在諸佛,供養法身,師敬尊重」,以三世諸佛同以法身為歸敬之境。

此論以般若波羅蜜為核心,將諸佛本源歸於般若,謂「實般若波羅蜜名三世諸佛母,能示一切法實相」,此乃本論獨特之表述——以「三世諸佛母」定位般若,顯示般若為諸佛所共由生。

關於諸佛之分布,此論展開對「三世十方佛」之辯證。聲聞行者質疑何以不言十方佛,唯舉過去釋迦文尼、拘陳若等一百佛、未來彌勒等五百佛;本論則以十方世界皆有老、病、死、婬、瞋、癡等苦惱,證成「無老、病、死、煩惱者,諸佛則不出世」,故三世十方佛理應實有。此論又引《雜阿含經》廣說十方無量世界之成住壞空、眾生三苦,皆由諸佛出世濟度,以為旁證。

值佛之難易,此論多設譬喻。舍衛城九億家中,佛住世二十五年,仍有三億家不聞不見;貧老母背佛之喻,示無因緣者雖值佛亦不得見。又以雨普遍而餓鬼不得飲,明法身佛常放光明、常說法,然眾生以罪重故不見不聞,如「日出盲者不見、雷霆振地聾者不聞」。

此論對信與不信十方佛之罪福,分析特詳。實有十方佛而言無者,「得破十方佛無量重罪」;實無而言有者,「得恭敬福」,以其「善心因緣福德力大故」。論中引「鬼神王稽首三世佛,然後別歸命釋迦牟尼佛」之偈,以證十方現在佛之實有;又從過去無量、未來無量推論現在亦應無量。值佛因緣則舉遍吉菩薩像摩癩病者、讀《法華經》比丘見金色人騎白象、誦《阿彌陀佛經》者臨終見佛等現事,證「罪垢結薄、一心念佛、信淨不疑,必得見佛」。

至於三世佛功德之證得,此論明示:「菩薩摩訶薩欲得過去、未來、現在諸佛功德者,當學般若波羅蜜」。論中以《三十三天品經》釋迦文佛對目連之開示為例,謂目連所見佛事甚少,東方有國黃金為地、白銀為地、七寶為地等無量世界,其中諸佛「皆是我身而作佛事」,南西北方、四維、上下亦復如是,明一佛能現無量佛身、諸佛功德平等無多無少之義。

綜觀此論,論「諸佛」所用術語以「三世諸佛」「三世十方佛」「三世佛」「法身佛」為主,特別強調般若為「三世諸佛母」之獨特觀點,並以罪福因緣與現世驗證雙軌並陳其義。

景德傳燈錄T2076 · 史傳部

《景德傳燈錄》論「諸佛」,主要用語為「諸佛」與「三世諸佛」;另有「千佛」「佛佛」等相關形式。「三世」即從過去、現在、未來統攝一切佛,但本書的著眼處並非鋪陳諸佛名號、因行或功德,而是將「三世諸佛」置於禪師問答、示眾與偈語之中,用來顯示言語、知解、思議及分別所不能及之處。

一、諸佛被標舉為最親、最可尊奉者。原文以「父母非我親,誰是最親者;諸佛非我道,誰為最道者」反詰,將諸佛與父母並舉,突出其「最親」「最道」的地位。此處只稱「諸佛」,未特加「三世」限定。

二、「三世諸佛」常用於反轉通常的知解。南泉之語被問及「貍奴白牯卻知有,三世諸佛不知有」,答語又說「未入鹿苑時猶較些子」,並未把「不知有」解作欠缺知識,而是保留在機鋒問答之中;相對地,貍奴白牯之「知有」亦以「汝爭怪得伊」回應。 雪竇常通答「如何是三世諸佛出身處」時說「伊不肯知有汝三世」,又令問者向「著佛不得處」體取,顯示「三世」本身亦可成為應當超越的分別名相。

三、本書屢以諸佛表示言思所不及。常通說「千佛不能思,萬聖不能議」,又說「三世唱不起」;鼓山示眾亦說「三世諸佛不能唱,十二分教載不起」,並連帶說凡聖不能攝、古今不能傳。這些表述並非否定諸佛,而是藉諸佛尚且不能思、不能議、不能唱,凸顯所指之事不可由言句與教說承載。

四、「三世諸佛」也被放入當下處所的問答。禪師指庵前一塊石說「三世諸佛總在裏許」,雪峯則答「須知有不在裏許者」,使「在」與「不在」同時成為勘驗之端。 問「如何是三世諸佛道場」,答「莫別瞻禮」;追問「亘古亘今」,又以「是什麼年中」截斷對年代的執著,不另立一處供人向外尋覓。

五、諸佛亦被說成傳語與相傳者。報慈慧朗面對「三世諸佛盡是傳語人,未審傳什麼人語」之問,只答「聽」,再以「爾不是鍾期」回應追問,重點落在當下能否聽會,而未說明一套可轉述的語義內容。 另有「佛佛授手,祖祖相傳」之問,所傳之法則以「老僧不解謾語」作答,仍避免將傳承固定為可陳說之物。

六、相關形式尚有「諸佛有難」及「三世諸佛道場」等。「諸佛有難,向火焰裏藏身」被用來引出衲僧有難向何處藏身的問答;此處「諸佛」是泛稱,未明言三世。 因而,本書記錄此概念時,以「諸佛」「三世諸佛」為主,間用「千佛」「佛佛」;其特色在於透過問答反覆呈現諸佛與「知有」「出身處」「道場」「傳語」「授手相傳」以及「不能思、議、唱」等語相連,而不作系統性的名相解說。

Related